There is a creative stew necessary for that. Nolan clearly isn't stewing anymore. David Lynch is a good example of someone who lives to stew. Nolan will be known as the hack who tanked his creative output making 3 shitty Batman movies.
and somehow I knew you'd throw out some trash psuedo babby's first artist horseshit like the midwit you are
11 months ago
Anonymous
You actually didn't know that. And I didn't even comment on McCarthy's quality or my opinion on him. So you're wrong and I'm right
11 months ago
Anonymous
too handsome to really give a frick either way champ
all the great artists took bits and pieces from other artists, either as homage or to try to improve the vision. it's called folk art.
>all the great artists took bits and pieces from other artists, either as homage or to try to improve the vision
they absolutely did not you talentless moron
11 months ago
Anonymous
So they have moron, even Borges said there's basically a handful of stories that people just create variations of
11 months ago
Anonymous
>hack homosexuals project their theivery onto actual artists >this gives the talentless the right to steal outright
like pottery
you're all trash goblins
11 months ago
Anonymous
Please give some examples of actual artists
11 months ago
Anonymous
I could list hundreds
you don't posses the inborn sense of objective beauty because you're not an artist
it would be wasted on you
11 months ago
Anonymous
And yet cannot list even one
11 months ago
Anonymous
you're beneath contempt so I'm just going to keep insulting you to your face and not engage in your redddit-teir 'arguing' as a substitute for actual conversation
plus im better than you and I know
11 months ago
Anonymous
You think Borges is talentless so you obviously have no sense of taste and probably don't even read lmao
11 months ago
Anonymous
>and probably don't even read lmao
reading is for fat people and midwits
11 months ago
Anonymous
t.
11 months ago
Anonymous
you're probably trolling but there's so many 75 IQ hispanics who post here that i legit cannot tell anymore
Cervantes, Borges, Calvino
style historically was a benchmark of craft not a raise de entre of authenticity
the truest way to learn a text is to translate and the art of copying is quite similar
just so you don't feel gasCinemaphile 🙂
what is there to even understand it's straightforward as frick
are you all fricking moronic??
Lol, look at these two pathetic homosexuals trying to be snobs. You're on Cinemaphile not reddit, you don't have to say Tarkovsky was a genius to get some karma points.
>you don't have to say Tarkovsky was a genius to get some karma points. >t. some homosexual who's never watched his films
he's great
I bet you think scorsese is the pinnacle of filmmaking
imagine watching this scene and not appreciating the artisty of tarkosfsky
not enough doo-wop and narration over everything enough to be a real film right guys?
How can you be a filmmaker without out having seen Tarkovsky? I saw all his movies when I was 14... They just let anyone get a camera and millions of dollars huh
>How can you be a filmmaker without out having seen Tarkovsky? I saw all his movies when I was 14...
I don't know. Ask filmmakers who preceded Tarkovsky or were his contemporaries. I'd argue you don't need to see any of Tarkovsky to be a great filmmaker.
Nolan is not a great filmmaker but still. If you were a composer who never listened to Bach or Mozart or a writer who never read Dostoevsky or Tolstoy there would be something wrong
>If you were a composer who never listened to Bach or Mozart or a writer who never read Dostoevsky or Tolstoy there would be something wrong
Cinema isn't music and even if it were Tarkovsky isn't the equivalent of Bach or Mozart, lmao.
That's the point moron. They're overrated. If you have to be introduced to someone popular and overrated you're a pleb. Who do you think isn't overrated anyways?
if nolan is a fan of art films why does the camera spazz around like a post-9/11 government action movie my grandpa watches on tv whenever people are talking? the only cool shots were the landscapes and the auditorium. feels like he didnt even want to make this movie
>if nolan is a fan of art films why does the camera spazz
The implication here is that you need to do steady cam and le heckin long takes if you're a fan of "art films"?
yes but also have some frickin variety. oh i guess the president scene was fun too. idk im a hater. im curious now tho about the movies he cares about making
snyder-esque
Nolan is Snyder for the reddit audience.
Snyder is for the Indian audience
Whatever happened to originality?
There's nothing new under the sun
There is a creative stew necessary for that. Nolan clearly isn't stewing anymore. David Lynch is a good example of someone who lives to stew. Nolan will be known as the hack who tanked his creative output making 3 shitty Batman movies.
lynch is nolan for pseuds
Only pseuds believe in that because they can't accept the nature of Lynch's work.
You think Tarkovsky didn't watch Metropolis or Citizen Kane? Everyone steals from everyone else bro.
no they don't you talentless sack of shit
you'll never be an artist
Bro this is Cinemaphile, don't act like your credentials matter here you dumb moron.
my credentials have nothing to do with the current generation of homosexuals who steal wholesale and are entirely devoid of creative spark
Explain the difference between an homage/tribute and plagiarism wienerstain.
I've never had to consider it because I'm handsome and naturally talented
>never had a thought
thinking is for ugly midwits homosexual
the rest of us are busy doing and fricking your sister
that was quick
that's what happens when your brain works correctly and aren't a fat mouth breathing homosexual
meant how quickly angry your post got
yeah i'm furious you have no taste in film and type like your grammarly app can't connect to the server
then you should know im not the original anon you were talking to about plagarism
there's no id's how the frick could anyone know that
you pedantic little twerp
The difference is an Oscar.
All books are made up of other books - Cormac McCarthy
cormac mccarty frickin sucks
Somehow I knew that would be the response
and somehow I knew you'd throw out some trash psuedo babby's first artist horseshit like the midwit you are
You actually didn't know that. And I didn't even comment on McCarthy's quality or my opinion on him. So you're wrong and I'm right
too handsome to really give a frick either way champ
>all the great artists took bits and pieces from other artists, either as homage or to try to improve the vision
they absolutely did not you talentless moron
So they have moron, even Borges said there's basically a handful of stories that people just create variations of
>hack homosexuals project their theivery onto actual artists
>this gives the talentless the right to steal outright
like pottery
you're all trash goblins
Please give some examples of actual artists
I could list hundreds
you don't posses the inborn sense of objective beauty because you're not an artist
it would be wasted on you
And yet cannot list even one
you're beneath contempt so I'm just going to keep insulting you to your face and not engage in your redddit-teir 'arguing' as a substitute for actual conversation
plus im better than you and I know
You think Borges is talentless so you obviously have no sense of taste and probably don't even read lmao
>and probably don't even read lmao
reading is for fat people and midwits
t.
you're probably trolling but there's so many 75 IQ hispanics who post here that i legit cannot tell anymore
>All books are made up of other books - Cormac McCarthy
you're a practically illiterate if you attribute that notion to Cormac
Oh boy. We got a lowest IQ moron over here that don't have the slightest idea how anything works.
Midwit spotted
Bresson never stole from anyone. He created his own language. That's why he's clear of every shitter like Tarkovsky or Bergman.
>Bresson never stole from anyone
Are you moronic or do you not know your Bresson?
all the great artists took bits and pieces from other artists, either as homage or to try to improve the vision. it's called folk art.
Cervantes, Borges, Calvino
style historically was a benchmark of craft not a raise de entre of authenticity
the truest way to learn a text is to translate and the art of copying is quite similar
just so you don't feel gasCinemaphile 🙂
the milkman, the paper boy, evening tv
It's a woman staring at nature. How the frick is this plagiarism or whatever
There has never been an original work of art ever.
The Milkman. The paperboy. Evening tv. How did I get to living here? The worlds confusing me.
that pepe isn't very sexy
HE ACTUALLY DID THE THINGERINO!!!
No meme arrow therefore you look like that and say that tho
>hack hacks
Expected.
>Can't copy Kubrick
>Decides to move on to copying Tarkovsky
>woman looking in the distance shot
What am I supposed to be seeing here
I bet you a million bucks he didn't understand Mirror (nobody does) and he's just parroting that it's a masterpiece to sound intellectual.
It's possible to appreciate movies on the basis of shot composition and general cinematography alone bro.
Lol, look at these two pathetic homosexuals trying to be snobs. You're on Cinemaphile not reddit, you don't have to say Tarkovsky was a genius to get some karma points.
>you don't have to say Tarkovsky was a genius to get some karma points.
>t. some homosexual who's never watched his films
he's great
I bet you think scorsese is the pinnacle of filmmaking
You're so pathetic. Can you even articulate why he's great? I bet you can't, just like Nolan.
If you don't understand a Tarkovsky movie I'm sorry to say you have room temperature IQ anon.
what is there to even understand it's straightforward as frick
are you all fricking moronic??
I never understood this? for many this is one of the greatest shots of all time but why? what is so great about it?
it's original and not stolen by hacks who have no inborn creativity of their own
There is nothing great about it. Tarkovsky sucks. I wanted to throw my drink at the screen during Nostalgia.
Cringe
Is that.... A woman and a wood fence???? HOW DARE YOU STEAL THIS COMPLETELY ORIGINAL AND UNIQUE IDEA!!! FOR SHAME!!!
the irony is nolan couldn't even compose his shot well even when he was ripping it off
>gets introduced to entry level late in to his career
Explains a lot.
Meanwhile, nuclear explosion in Soviet Russia
imagine watching this scene and not appreciating the artisty of tarkosfsky
not enough doo-wop and narration over everything enough to be a real film right guys?
Tarkovsky made really beautiful pictures. too bad he was a christard
why do people pretend swivelling the camera around to reveal stuff through reflections is good directing?
It was supposed to emulate an impossible otherworldly dream logic feel. But you're a small souled literalist with autism
because it is
yuck
The real news is that Nolan didn't know what The Mirror was until 10 years ago.
Fricking seriously. Holy shit.
you mediocre homosexuals all sound the same to your betters
kino
>Tarkovsky invented sitting on a fence
oh frick off
I prefer Samurai Jack over Mirror when it comes to Tartakovsky's oeuvre
So what's the thing he did?
Some of you guys need a hobby you can get good at. Then maybe you wouldn't feel so defensive over the work of others when no one asked.
>Prior to making Interstellar.
How can you be a filmmaker without out having seen Tarkovsky? I saw all his movies when I was 14... They just let anyone get a camera and millions of dollars huh
>How can you be a filmmaker without out having seen Tarkovsky? I saw all his movies when I was 14...
I don't know. Ask filmmakers who preceded Tarkovsky or were his contemporaries. I'd argue you don't need to see any of Tarkovsky to be a great filmmaker.
Nolan is not a great filmmaker but still. If you were a composer who never listened to Bach or Mozart or a writer who never read Dostoevsky or Tolstoy there would be something wrong
>If you were a composer who never listened to Bach or Mozart or a writer who never read Dostoevsky or Tolstoy there would be something wrong
Cinema isn't music and even if it were Tarkovsky isn't the equivalent of Bach or Mozart, lmao.
I'm obviously saying what is often considered to be the best in their medium.
yes he is
shut up homosexual
>Dostoevsky or Tolstoy
Both beyond overrated
That's the point moron. They're overrated. If you have to be introduced to someone popular and overrated you're a pleb. Who do you think isn't overrated anyways?
if nolan is a fan of art films why does the camera spazz around like a post-9/11 government action movie my grandpa watches on tv whenever people are talking? the only cool shots were the landscapes and the auditorium. feels like he didnt even want to make this movie
>if nolan is a fan of art films why does the camera spazz
The implication here is that you need to do steady cam and le heckin long takes if you're a fan of "art films"?
yes but also have some frickin variety. oh i guess the president scene was fun too. idk im a hater. im curious now tho about the movies he cares about making
>He... did the thing? The thingy... thing? This. Is. Everything.
reminder Nolan doesn't understand mirrors, so how could he possibly understand zerkalo?
>be a huge film director
>have no idea of tarkovsky's meme films
they're not even that good, that's basically your intro to international cinema
Lmao he had not seen Mirror until 2013? What a pleb
oh, well BRAVO then I guess