Seize the moment before life passes you by.
Ennis allowed society to control his actions to the point he denied his identity, created a fake family, forcing his true love to create a fake family, and in the process resulting in 4 miserable people (not including the children).
If they had just agreed to living as ranchers together or off-the-grid in a quiet life in the countryside, they could have just ignored society’s expectations. Jake Gylenhaal’s character wouldn’t have gotten AIDS if Heath just accepted reality.
it's just a story of traumatized people. gyllenhall and ledger are traumatized because they have to constantly hide. ledger is just a sad c**t period.
also as much as people just shit on this movie as gay propaganda or whatever, they do a great job of not glorifying gay lifestyles or letting them off the hook. it is explicitly shown that ledger is destroying his wife emotionally by basically cheating on her with another man right in front of her. she's so devastated that I actually felt worse for her than anyone else
other media just kind of laughs it off as "oh its ok to cheat if its a gay relationship" for example in friends, they just play the fact that ross's wife completely abandoned him, cheated and took his baby away for laughs because it was with another woman.
Ennis assumes he was beaten to death trying to cruise the wrong guys, he was told Jack just overinflated a tire. The audience is not told explicitly what happened, just that Ennis thinks Jack's family might've lied to him
Imagine being such a moronic and pathetic drone that you unironically feel "touched" by that shitty self-pitying drivel.
Kek you're such a braindead npc.
>denied his identity
Are you implying that the behavior of behaving sexually with the wrong sex is an identity? No it's a behavior.
These abusers were addicted to homosexual behavior, just like a fat frick is addicted to junk food, he may try to diet at some point because they know better than me how horrible this behavior is, they see it, I can only imagine it, but then they "crash" and indulge in those inhuman actions, There is no love in homosexuality, you cannot love someone and doom them to something that goes against their nature like homosexuality, that's a war against your own self which you can only lose either way. The only way is to quit the homosexual behavior like quitting nicotine.
N-NOOO B-BUT MUH PRIDE!!!
In all seriousness though, you're 100% right. Even in the movie, when the two guys reunite, the first thing they do is frick like rabbits right in front of the house. That's not really just a "different lifestyle", that's closer to how a crack addict would react when he gets his hands on what's destroying his life again.
A crack addict is also a "lifestyle", the person was never born a crack addict, he chose to gain habits and over the years those habits became uncontrollable but from the start it was still a choice that the person made and not an identity. Just the name "crack addict" might confuse people into thinking that this person's identity is "the crack addict guy" and he cannot change, but that's just a failure of the English language, when someone says that he "is" something, for example he's a movie goer, a wood carver, a gym goer, etc. They are just telling you that in the future they will attempt to commit those behaviors again, hence why people cringe when homosexuals say that they are homosexuals in front of children, they are admitting that they will commit sexual perversions in the near future in front of children. It's like saying "Hey children, by the way, I'll use my penis with a goat sometimes this week." But on the other hand, they'll know who to avoid if they have any judgment.
>the person was never born a crack addict, he chose to gain habits and over the years those habits became uncontrollable but from the start it was still a choice that the person made and not an identity
You mean like how those two decided to frick each other in the mountain which kickstarted their addiction to gay sex? Do you really not see how disingenuous you sound?
I mean you can make the same argument for sex addicts in general, but it's clear gays are the ones who are the most obsessed with sex.
>Do you really not see how disingenuous you sound?
No.
Habits start small and can seem unnoticeable, but they are conscious and willing.
it can be like any other addiction, like drinking alcohol, it's often something used as a self-medication, they have a problem and they try to cope with that misbehavior which gives the illusion that the problem is gone.
11 months ago
Anonymous
All of what you said applies to homosexual sex, too.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, it's also an addiction that is built and can be quit with diligence, but not if you think that's it's your "identity".
Actually straights are the most obsessed with sex, that's why there's so many of them.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Lies.
Straight men don't like sex. They only have it to follow the biblical command to be fruitful and multiply.
11 months ago
Anonymous
I'm gay and haven't had sex.
11 months ago
Anonymous
It's true, homosexuals cannot even engage in sex, they can only engage in sexual perversions, which means that normal people are more obsessed with sex and homosexuals are more obsessed with degeneracy and not with sex at all.
If you think the move is celebrating homos, you're a little off the mark. I don't think it's so much a love story as it is a story about indulging in appetites. The two homos are fairly destructive to those around them.
>Ennis allowed society to control his actions to the point he denied his identity,
The older I get, the more convinced I am this is at the root of right wing beliefs. Introspection can be terrifying, especially if you glance within yourself and see something you don't understand or were raised to be ashamed of. When you've fully explored yourself you gain a new recognition for the uniqueness in others; it becomes much harder to hate someone for being different when you've abandoned your need to repress self and conform. The right winger glances inside, becomes terrified, shuts the door and adopts the identity of some larger group. They surround themselves with others who have also repressed their unique self. In this comfortable group identity they virtue signal by openly attacking those who have not adopted their group identity and are rewarded with closer integration.
I might be wrong but I've always been confused by the non-stop hatred towards anyone different you see from the right. This is the only explanation that makes sense to me.
Or you know right wingers just think gay sex is disgusting, unnatural and goes against God. A lot of mental gymnastics for something that 99% of the population finds absolutely disgusting.
>Or you know right wingers just think gay sex is disgusting, unnatural and goes against God. A lot of mental gymnastics for something that 99% of the population finds absolutely disgusting.
I think man on man gay sex is disgusting. I also think fat women are disgusting. Most black women I've met disgust me on some level. I can go on, plenty of things are gross but I've never thought "I find something about this person gross so I should harass them and agitate for laws that harm them." How do you jump from "he is gross" to "this is gross so I need to cause emotional or physical harm to him."
also, read your bible. an absurd amount of every day shit is "unnatural and goes against God." christians just aren't aware because they don't read their bible and they go to churches that tell them "oh lol ignore the first half of the bible." despite jesus saying the old law will not pass away. the bible is also clear about all sins being "equal" with the only unpardonable sin being blaspheming god. this is why you see churches openly welcoming gays. sure they are in sin according to the bible but so are gamblers, addicts, people using pharmakeia, people that lust after women, etc. the bible is clear that ALL have sinned and fallen short. the bible doesn't say "ok here are the sins that are no big deal but gay is a big deal so make sure to harass these people thus sayeth the lord."
Right wing just means siding with tradition normally, like monarchist in the French revolution. You are really off-base.
>I might be wrong but I've always been confused by the non-stop hatred towards anyone different you see from the right
Ocytocin is a hormone that is said that makes you "love", it was once studied with the hopes of administering it to people to "cure" them of "racism" but then they found that people high with ocytocin will love and approach people more often, but if they look like them and they'll have an increased distrust from people who don't look like them, as in it creates a familial love which reinforces familial protection which in turns makes them more "racist" as precaution to their kin. So you see how you got things completely inverted? You are just a isolated golem made to only feel pleasure from consuming and to never actually feel love because loves threatens the left-wing hegemony and it's not like it's a secret that leftists want to destroy the family unit and replace it with gay discos, they though that "love" was on their side but actually it was diametrically opposed to their agenda. So your problem is that you don't love enough to understand.
based schizo poster
>RIGHT WINGERS BAD
Midwit
the post just asked "why is right wingers are so intent on hating everyone not like them?"
You homosexuals cancel and ruin lives left and right when someone doesnt conform to your beliefs, and you claim right wingers are the groupthink cult? Get real
not gay. you are referring to the "paradox of tolerance."
a group that advocates tolerance of others regardless of race, sex or religion will not survive if it allows the voices demanding hatred on the basis of race, sex or religion overwhelm them. basically, tolerance only works if people are tolerant.
Right wing just means siding with tradition normally, like monarchist in the French revolution. You are really off-base.
>I might be wrong but I've always been confused by the non-stop hatred towards anyone different you see from the right
Ocytocin is a hormone that is said that makes you "love", it was once studied with the hopes of administering it to people to "cure" them of "racism" but then they found that people high with ocytocin will love and approach people more often, but if they look like them and they'll have an increased distrust from people who don't look like them, as in it creates a familial love which reinforces familial protection which in turns makes them more "racist" as precaution to their kin. So you see how you got things completely inverted? You are just a isolated golem made to only feel pleasure from consuming and to never actually feel love because loves threatens the left-wing hegemony and it's not like it's a secret that leftists want to destroy the family unit and replace it with gay discos, they though that "love" was on their side but actually it was diametrically opposed to their agenda. So your problem is that you don't love enough to understand.
You homosexuals cancel and ruin lives left and right when someone doesnt conform to your beliefs, and you claim right wingers are the groupthink cult? Get real
No it's wrong, what is precisely wrong is that it's the wrong sex. Humans are only compatible sexually with the opposite sex, that's the nature of sex itself and homosexual acceptance destroys that notion of sex which then leads to the transsexual confusion because nobody can define what is a woman anymore since a woman is a sex and had to be defined by sex. (No it's not "adult human female" you zionists shills.)
Ennis had everything at the start. A wife, children, a job, a boyfriend.
At the end, he's divorced, his daughters hate him and his boyfriend died. Cuck
Talk about a movie ahead of it's time. This movie would of blown the back out of the boxoffice if it was released in today climate. Gay people were still homosexuals back then, ridiculed to stay in their closets forever. This movie was like shock culture. You basically were outted as a homosexual if you said you saw it. This movie hurt the frick out of both of their reputations at the time. They have both recovered, but the fact they are not remembered as the butt bumping cowboy duo is a testimate to their acting talents.
>A movie ahead of its time.
Except for Cruising, Midnight Cowboy, The Birdcage, and tons of other Gay movies that preceded it (mainstream and otherwise). Philadelphia, Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, etc.
You just could argue that this is the first time they tried to accurately portray a gay love story and not holding back at all. And it was done by two rising popular Hollywood actors. And it was directed by a hugely talented director with a big budget. That’s what made this such a cultural phenomenon
>This movie would have grossed more money at the box office in today’s climate.
I think it could go either way. Piracy is much more rampant. While they had torrenting and stuff, nowadays we have tons of illegal streaming sites, thousands of private trackers, etc. I think the prevalence of going quickly to digital is another impact on the box office. A lot of people would wait. And remember, this movie was Rated R which would lower the impact of the box office even further.
I think the best time for that movie to released was between 2005-2013. Gay rights activists were still fighting for gay marriage, they had just had a few successes in certain states regarding civil unions, and people were taking this movie as making a statement. A lot of people went multiple times as almost a protest vote.
After gay marriage was legalized, I think it wouldn’t have been as impactful.
If it were released today, while you’d have a lot more gay zoomers excited to see it, you’d have an equal number of people annoyed at being inundated with so much gay stuff all the time. Call Me By Your Name is a great case study. It only grossed $43 million worldwide and it was a huge cultural phenomenon at the time.
I have a strong feeling Brokeback Mountain would gross about twice that - still doing worse than the initial release in 2005.
>I disagree with most of what you said.
That's fair, we could be different ages as well. Different social climate at different ages. It's less about how society takes things and it's more about how your demographic takes it, and I was pretty young. I didn't even know there were other famous homosexual movies. No way in hell I'm reading the rest of that, I'm fine with agreeing to disagree.
>I was pretty young.
Then shut the frick up, you clearly have no clue what you're talking about. In general, if you dont know what you're talking about shut the frick up.
Can confirm, homosexuality was imposed in Canada in 2003, 20 years later in 2021 it was made illegal to quit homosexuality.
Peak western homosexual propaganda was 1990-2005. In 1989 the book "After the Ball" was published which outlined the propaganda plan to make America a homosexual nation.
How is this compared to Moonlight? I like both leads but not a fan of homosexuals at all but i do appreciate good storytelling. Hopefully no full blown gay sex scenes.
If you give in to your lust for bussy, it will make you divorce your pretty wife and you'll be lonely the rest of your life.
Also something to do with the solitary individualistic nature of masculinity.
i watched it with mother, little sister and grandma when it was dubbed for TV and praised as critically acclaimed and scandalous
when they started ass drilling, grandma was laughing faster than Eminem, i was embarassed, mother said don't watch and sister also laughed
Don't play grab ass when your supposed to be watching the sheep.
Cowboys are gay.
People were more decent then. israelites and evilwood was and is indoctrinating susceptible people. And probably this
Seize the moment before life passes you by.
Ennis allowed society to control his actions to the point he denied his identity, created a fake family, forcing his true love to create a fake family, and in the process resulting in 4 miserable people (not including the children).
If they had just agreed to living as ranchers together or off-the-grid in a quiet life in the countryside, they could have just ignored society’s expectations. Jake Gylenhaal’s character wouldn’t have gotten AIDS if Heath just accepted reality.
>Ennis
Really? One of the characters was called Ennis?
Yeah, Heath’s character. It’s such a stupid name, that’s why I remember it.
I forget the name of Jake’s character.
>I forget the name of Jake’s character.
was it Ranus, by any chance?
Jakes character also has a stupid name. Jack twist.
More like penis
His fate could have been averted if he had been called Agina, really makes you think... sad.
it's just a story of traumatized people. gyllenhall and ledger are traumatized because they have to constantly hide. ledger is just a sad c**t period.
also as much as people just shit on this movie as gay propaganda or whatever, they do a great job of not glorifying gay lifestyles or letting them off the hook. it is explicitly shown that ledger is destroying his wife emotionally by basically cheating on her with another man right in front of her. she's so devastated that I actually felt worse for her than anyone else
other media just kind of laughs it off as "oh its ok to cheat if its a gay relationship" for example in friends, they just play the fact that ross's wife completely abandoned him, cheated and took his baby away for laughs because it was with another woman.
good post
>good post
No it's wasn't, you're just a brainless moron.
Prove me wrong, homosexual
>Jake Gylenhaal’s character wouldn’t have gotten AIDS if Heath just accepted reality.
but Jake character was beaten to death
Ennis assumes he was beaten to death trying to cruise the wrong guys, he was told Jack just overinflated a tire. The audience is not told explicitly what happened, just that Ennis thinks Jack's family might've lied to him
;__;
Imagine being such a moronic and pathetic drone that you unironically feel "touched" by that shitty self-pitying drivel.
Kek you're such a braindead npc.
>denied his identity
Are you implying that the behavior of behaving sexually with the wrong sex is an identity? No it's a behavior.
These abusers were addicted to homosexual behavior, just like a fat frick is addicted to junk food, he may try to diet at some point because they know better than me how horrible this behavior is, they see it, I can only imagine it, but then they "crash" and indulge in those inhuman actions, There is no love in homosexuality, you cannot love someone and doom them to something that goes against their nature like homosexuality, that's a war against your own self which you can only lose either way. The only way is to quit the homosexual behavior like quitting nicotine.
N-NOOO B-BUT MUH PRIDE!!!
In all seriousness though, you're 100% right. Even in the movie, when the two guys reunite, the first thing they do is frick like rabbits right in front of the house. That's not really just a "different lifestyle", that's closer to how a crack addict would react when he gets his hands on what's destroying his life again.
A crack addict is also a "lifestyle", the person was never born a crack addict, he chose to gain habits and over the years those habits became uncontrollable but from the start it was still a choice that the person made and not an identity. Just the name "crack addict" might confuse people into thinking that this person's identity is "the crack addict guy" and he cannot change, but that's just a failure of the English language, when someone says that he "is" something, for example he's a movie goer, a wood carver, a gym goer, etc. They are just telling you that in the future they will attempt to commit those behaviors again, hence why people cringe when homosexuals say that they are homosexuals in front of children, they are admitting that they will commit sexual perversions in the near future in front of children. It's like saying "Hey children, by the way, I'll use my penis with a goat sometimes this week." But on the other hand, they'll know who to avoid if they have any judgment.
>the person was never born a crack addict, he chose to gain habits and over the years those habits became uncontrollable but from the start it was still a choice that the person made and not an identity
You mean like how those two decided to frick each other in the mountain which kickstarted their addiction to gay sex? Do you really not see how disingenuous you sound?
I mean you can make the same argument for sex addicts in general, but it's clear gays are the ones who are the most obsessed with sex.
>Do you really not see how disingenuous you sound?
No.
Habits start small and can seem unnoticeable, but they are conscious and willing.
it can be like any other addiction, like drinking alcohol, it's often something used as a self-medication, they have a problem and they try to cope with that misbehavior which gives the illusion that the problem is gone.
All of what you said applies to homosexual sex, too.
Yes, it's also an addiction that is built and can be quit with diligence, but not if you think that's it's your "identity".
Actually straights are the most obsessed with sex, that's why there's so many of them.
Lies.
Straight men don't like sex. They only have it to follow the biblical command to be fruitful and multiply.
I'm gay and haven't had sex.
It's true, homosexuals cannot even engage in sex, they can only engage in sexual perversions, which means that normal people are more obsessed with sex and homosexuals are more obsessed with degeneracy and not with sex at all.
...and it's beautiful (according to the movie*~~
If you think the move is celebrating homos, you're a little off the mark. I don't think it's so much a love story as it is a story about indulging in appetites. The two homos are fairly destructive to those around them.
>Ennis allowed society to control his actions to the point he denied his identity,
The older I get, the more convinced I am this is at the root of right wing beliefs. Introspection can be terrifying, especially if you glance within yourself and see something you don't understand or were raised to be ashamed of. When you've fully explored yourself you gain a new recognition for the uniqueness in others; it becomes much harder to hate someone for being different when you've abandoned your need to repress self and conform. The right winger glances inside, becomes terrified, shuts the door and adopts the identity of some larger group. They surround themselves with others who have also repressed their unique self. In this comfortable group identity they virtue signal by openly attacking those who have not adopted their group identity and are rewarded with closer integration.
I might be wrong but I've always been confused by the non-stop hatred towards anyone different you see from the right. This is the only explanation that makes sense to me.
Or you know right wingers just think gay sex is disgusting, unnatural and goes against God. A lot of mental gymnastics for something that 99% of the population finds absolutely disgusting.
I think surstromming is disgusting and unnatural but I'm not gonna lose sleep over someone eating it.
>Or you know right wingers just think gay sex is disgusting, unnatural and goes against God. A lot of mental gymnastics for something that 99% of the population finds absolutely disgusting.
I think man on man gay sex is disgusting. I also think fat women are disgusting. Most black women I've met disgust me on some level. I can go on, plenty of things are gross but I've never thought "I find something about this person gross so I should harass them and agitate for laws that harm them." How do you jump from "he is gross" to "this is gross so I need to cause emotional or physical harm to him."
also, read your bible. an absurd amount of every day shit is "unnatural and goes against God." christians just aren't aware because they don't read their bible and they go to churches that tell them "oh lol ignore the first half of the bible." despite jesus saying the old law will not pass away. the bible is also clear about all sins being "equal" with the only unpardonable sin being blaspheming god. this is why you see churches openly welcoming gays. sure they are in sin according to the bible but so are gamblers, addicts, people using pharmakeia, people that lust after women, etc. the bible is clear that ALL have sinned and fallen short. the bible doesn't say "ok here are the sins that are no big deal but gay is a big deal so make sure to harass these people thus sayeth the lord."
based schizo poster
the post just asked "why is right wingers are so intent on hating everyone not like them?"
not gay. you are referring to the "paradox of tolerance."
a group that advocates tolerance of others regardless of race, sex or religion will not survive if it allows the voices demanding hatred on the basis of race, sex or religion overwhelm them. basically, tolerance only works if people are tolerant.
Right wing just means siding with tradition normally, like monarchist in the French revolution. You are really off-base.
>I might be wrong but I've always been confused by the non-stop hatred towards anyone different you see from the right
Ocytocin is a hormone that is said that makes you "love", it was once studied with the hopes of administering it to people to "cure" them of "racism" but then they found that people high with ocytocin will love and approach people more often, but if they look like them and they'll have an increased distrust from people who don't look like them, as in it creates a familial love which reinforces familial protection which in turns makes them more "racist" as precaution to their kin. So you see how you got things completely inverted? You are just a isolated golem made to only feel pleasure from consuming and to never actually feel love because loves threatens the left-wing hegemony and it's not like it's a secret that leftists want to destroy the family unit and replace it with gay discos, they though that "love" was on their side but actually it was diametrically opposed to their agenda. So your problem is that you don't love enough to understand.
>Right wing just means siding with tradition normally
What compels a person to side with tradition?
>RIGHT WINGERS BAD
Midwit
embarrassing
They are bad though.
kys redditjakBlack person
You just proved his point though
You homosexuals cancel and ruin lives left and right when someone doesnt conform to your beliefs, and you claim right wingers are the groupthink cult? Get real
But then they’d be homosexuals 🙁
Also some women don't like to fricked in the ass.
Women are psychos and you'd be happier off with a man who actually loves you for you.
Fellas got their back broke on that there mountain. That's all the message it needed.
>actually watching this
really anons?
It's one of my favourite movies of all time and I'm straight.
There is literally nothing wrong with a man loving another man and doing stuff to each other.
have a nice day homosexual
No it's wrong, what is precisely wrong is that it's the wrong sex. Humans are only compatible sexually with the opposite sex, that's the nature of sex itself and homosexual acceptance destroys that notion of sex which then leads to the transsexual confusion because nobody can define what is a woman anymore since a woman is a sex and had to be defined by sex. (No it's not "adult human female" you zionists shills.)
It's actually a literary and beautifully shot film with a lot to say about homosexualry and men and women in general. Good kino.
Plap plap plap get pregnant get pregnant get pregnant
Ennis had everything at the start. A wife, children, a job, a boyfriend.
At the end, he's divorced, his daughters hate him and his boyfriend died. Cuck
For me it was don't get married if you're a gay.
cowboys are gayboys
Gonna need a prequel, Brokebuck Mountain
Talk about a movie ahead of it's time. This movie would of blown the back out of the boxoffice if it was released in today climate. Gay people were still homosexuals back then, ridiculed to stay in their closets forever. This movie was like shock culture. You basically were outted as a homosexual if you said you saw it. This movie hurt the frick out of both of their reputations at the time. They have both recovered, but the fact they are not remembered as the butt bumping cowboy duo is a testimate to their acting talents.
I disagree with most of what you said.
>A movie ahead of its time.
Except for Cruising, Midnight Cowboy, The Birdcage, and tons of other Gay movies that preceded it (mainstream and otherwise). Philadelphia, Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, etc.
You just could argue that this is the first time they tried to accurately portray a gay love story and not holding back at all. And it was done by two rising popular Hollywood actors. And it was directed by a hugely talented director with a big budget. That’s what made this such a cultural phenomenon
>This movie would have grossed more money at the box office in today’s climate.
I think it could go either way. Piracy is much more rampant. While they had torrenting and stuff, nowadays we have tons of illegal streaming sites, thousands of private trackers, etc. I think the prevalence of going quickly to digital is another impact on the box office. A lot of people would wait. And remember, this movie was Rated R which would lower the impact of the box office even further.
I think the best time for that movie to released was between 2005-2013. Gay rights activists were still fighting for gay marriage, they had just had a few successes in certain states regarding civil unions, and people were taking this movie as making a statement. A lot of people went multiple times as almost a protest vote.
After gay marriage was legalized, I think it wouldn’t have been as impactful.
If it were released today, while you’d have a lot more gay zoomers excited to see it, you’d have an equal number of people annoyed at being inundated with so much gay stuff all the time. Call Me By Your Name is a great case study. It only grossed $43 million worldwide and it was a huge cultural phenomenon at the time.
I have a strong feeling Brokeback Mountain would gross about twice that - still doing worse than the initial release in 2005.
>I disagree with most of what you said.
That's fair, we could be different ages as well. Different social climate at different ages. It's less about how society takes things and it's more about how your demographic takes it, and I was pretty young. I didn't even know there were other famous homosexual movies. No way in hell I'm reading the rest of that, I'm fine with agreeing to disagree.
have a nice day
Zoomers brain ez clapz gg no re (Fortnite dance on your baby sisters grave)
>I was pretty young.
Then shut the frick up, you clearly have no clue what you're talking about. In general, if you dont know what you're talking about shut the frick up.
nice reddit post you fricking homosexual imbecile. sod off
Go back redditard. Ever heard of MAID?
Go back to drink your gaylite gayboi before Muhamad throws you off a building in the next 20 years.
>Gay people were still homosexuals back then
WTF are you talking about? 2005 was peak gay.
Can confirm, homosexuality was imposed in Canada in 2003, 20 years later in 2021 it was made illegal to quit homosexuality.
Peak western homosexual propaganda was 1990-2005. In 1989 the book "After the Ball" was published which outlined the propaganda plan to make America a homosexual nation.
>Shot a coyote up there.
>It's a big son of a b***h.
>He had balls on him the size of apples.
>Moral: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DUIy5cCNYbI
>shorts
Not clicking.
broken buck mountain
WISH I KNEW HOW TO QUIT YOU
How is this compared to Moonlight? I like both leads but not a fan of homosexuals at all but i do appreciate good storytelling. Hopefully no full blown gay sex scenes.
I guess the turd doesn't fall far from the homosexual's ass
>What was the moral of the story?
don't be a gay.
i thought it was pretty obvious.
I like stories like this because they're fiction.
in reality, homosexuals are disgusting degenerates and insidious predators.
Leave your wife and bury your face in another man's hot butthole
>What was the moral of the story?
Spit before you insert.
kys diseased israelite homosexuals
Love is love. And it's fine to eat beans before anal.
there's nothing romantic about a tent reeking of shit. homosex is not love. homosexualry is demonic
They're cowboys. They're constantly surrounded by the smell of cow and horse shit. The smell of human shit is a nice change.
If you give in to your lust for bussy, it will make you divorce your pretty wife and you'll be lonely the rest of your life.
Also something to do with the solitary individualistic nature of masculinity.
Jews will normalise degeneracy and mental illnesses to divide, demoralise and conquer their host populations. Insidious parasites need to be deloused.
keep in mind, these are not modern gays, they fricked each other in their sweaty hairy shit-filled buttholes
So they don't eat da poopoo? Like ice cream?
This is a Batman prequel. Joker went evil after his ex wife killed his gay lover
This movie would've been better without all the gay stuff. It could have just been comfy cowboy kino instead.
When Donnie Darko has sex with the Joker, tragedy ensues.
18 naked cowboys in the showers at Ram Ranch!
i watched it with mother, little sister and grandma when it was dubbed for TV and praised as critically acclaimed and scandalous
when they started ass drilling, grandma was laughing faster than Eminem, i was embarassed, mother said don't watch and sister also laughed
Being gay will only bring death and loneliness.