>budget of 60 million. >gross: 1.1 million

>budget of 60 million
>gross: 1.1 million
LMAO

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    turns out nobody wants to actually watch a fricking pedo movie in a movie theater

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, no shit. Imagine walking up to the ticket counter all nervously, sweating profusely, you look around to make sure no one is watching you, you lean forward and whisper "o-one ticket for e-girlta, please".

      Showtime released the movie without marketing in the USA
      Mario Kassar and Lea Seydoux's uncle lost some money, oh what a tragedy
      I guess that's why they made Terminator 3 without Jim Cameron

      >Didn’t even cast a real e-girl

      unironically a great casting

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Lea Seydoux's uncle
        Lea Seydoux's grandfather

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Lea Seydoux's uncle lost some money
        lol you actually believe

        this fricking nepo c**t comes from a family that owns half of france
        they have so much fricking money 60 million is NOTHING for them

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          he's being sarcastic, you moron

          Pretty Babe made millions in the 70s. and is a cult classic and is on streaming.

          shacking underaged girls was still acceptable in the 70s.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            sorry if I don't find talentless rich kids taking over Hollywood funny

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty Babe made millions in the 70s. and is a cult classic and is on streaming.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The 70s were fricking wild

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Things don’t end well for the pedo and that’s why it wasn’t promoted.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick did it cost so much?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      how tf could you spent $60M (on top of that it was in 90s) to made pedo movie with literal nothing more than characters talked to each other?

      beautifully photographied period piece

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        a good camera doesn't cost 60 million

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        holy adhd

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Jeremy Irons seems like a good fit for Humbert Humbert

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He was a good choice, gave a great performance. Dominique was good too. It needed a better director.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He also did a great job reading the e-girlta audiobook

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >take novel with deceitful scummy pedo who weaponizes language and charm to plead his case
        >age up the victim
        >make it lighthearted borderline romantic comedy
        seriously what the FRICK was kubrick thinking

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how tf could you spent $60M (on top of that it was in 90s) to made pedo movie with literal nothing more than characters talked to each other?

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, no shit. Imagine walking up to the ticket counter all nervously, sweating profusely, you look around to make sure no one is watching you, you lean forward and whisper "o-one ticket for e-girlta, please".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Go to the theater
      >Unzip dick
      >Waddle to the counter in cowboy strides
      >"Morning Robert, One ticket to the finest pedo kinos in your stablishment, sir! I'm talking about e-girlTA of course! I'll be taking the seat right in the middle of the theater for the optimal viewing experience."
      >Proceeds to the concession stand
      >"I will have a large popcorn, extra buttery, a flavacol dipper, two cups of soda, leave one empty, and half packet of napkins if you may."
      >Proceeds to the kino hall
      >"tickets please"
      >*Erects dick* "Here you go my good sir!"
      >Hits fellow pedos in the face with his dick on his way to the seat
      >Trailers end and the movie begins
      >"It's morbin' time."

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kino

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          When the only person praising your post is an animetard, it's not really praise.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I accept your concession.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        kino

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >two cups of soda, leave one empty

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Now disclose the vhs/dvd sales. Oh, you didn't want to do that did you?

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will they ever make a book accurate version?

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Didn’t even cast a real e-girl

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yea, if it's not book accurate there's no point, it completely neuters the story's core idea.
    e-girlta isn't post-pubertal or even pubertal, she shouldn't even be conventionally beautiful, she should be a literal child. And not the timid innocent caricatures we have of children today, but the more natural free/feral child we had in the past, when children had more freedom to roam and play and were generally wild. Like Lyra Belaqua in His Dark Materials when she participated in gang wars with other children, or the street urchins of old victorian England who did much the same, or the homeless children gangs of Moscow or soviet Berlin, etc.

    I think much of e-girlta centered around Humbert's inability to reconcile the false image of a pure innocent child he had in his head with the reality of what a child actually is in reality, innocent but generally in a vile and selfish manner if treated as a peer/lover and not as a parent.

    Catherine Demongeot from Zazie or Mary Badham from To Kill a Mockingbird or a slightly younger Saoirse Ronan from Atonement is around the right age.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Still, this is a movie, so we would want a pretty little thing with DSLs.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >walk up to Robert
    >FRICK YEAH I WANNA WATCH THE FILM THAT'S ABOUT SEX WITH LITTLE GIRLS
    He'd never look at you the same way after that.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I watched this when I was 15 and said the girl was hot and my uncle called me a pedo. I’m still confused by this. What does that word even mean to people

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You’re uncle had problems…which i’m sure you’re well aware of

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What does that word even mean to people
      It's just another catch all insult like nazi or incel. It doesn't mean anything because there is no actual standard to judge when someone is sexually mature. For all of human history until just a few decades ago it was perfectly natural and good to be attracted to and marry girls who were able to give birth. This is how were are made to function and think. But modern society and feminism don't like that because it doesn't serve their goals so we have been brainwashed to think a 17 year old and 364 day old girl is gross and yucky and you are some freak of nature if you find her attractive. It's insane mental gymnastics.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I find it very strange that the internet and modern culture is turning everyone into ultra degenerate freaks, and super puritans at the same time somehow. I sometimes wonder what future generations will think of this period in time. I also wonder if anyone will know how many of us think all of this is stupid

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is one of those unfilmable novels. I think the Kubrick version at least captured some of the dark humor of the book.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Agreed on both points.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I mean she makes out with him and shit. If the actress was younger people would have chimped out. It already got soft banned for a while as it was.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *