Budget of 80 million
Will only make 25 million this week.
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Budget of 80 million. Will only make 25 million this week.
Budget of 80 million
Will only make 25 million this week.
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
they should have made a movie called "spider woman" starring sydney sweeney that's just a spider man movie but spider man is a big titted blonde. same powers, same personality, same villains but he's a chick with big breasts. that would have made a billion dollars
Just make a black cat movie already
What's the point? The perfect Black Cat was Sydney Sweeney and her moronic manager put her in this mess.
So true. Spider breasts could have saved capeshit.
This is literally all they had to do. They had complete legal authority to do it. Instead they just.... didn't.
Except they CANT do it, did you forget what world we’re living in right now or are you just moronic? ESG will literally not allow it. Why do you think everything is shit?
It's not about the money. It's about sending a message.
I was interested in Madame Web until I learned they're barely in the suits. An actual Spider-Woman or Spider-Girl or something movie would've done better.
It's a total bait-and-switch. They don't even have powers or suits for the whole movie, the bad guy just hallucinates that they kill him so he chases around 3 boring "high school" girls who dance on top of a diner table when they're supposed to be hiding
What the frick, man?
Why even watch this movie then?
I firmly believe this movie was actually a giant money laundering scheme
YOU need a CRANE lift, for the amt. of magic money being fleeced. Albeit, the 'laundromat printer', prop-see wars or the mockingbird have never ceased to exist, or deviated from uh-gender. Highlight ur comm., DEI exactly dictates 'devaluation of ind.' to earn credits aka the new profits. Shareholders be damned, as that to shall pass... approaching rather quick. Cheers.
a good friend invited me. the dialogue is really bad too.
I have a movie pass and my theater doesn't care if we bring in backpacks full of outside food and drink. I was hoping it would be so bad it's good, but it was just bad. Wish I'd taken some Dramamine, the camera could not stop fricking spinning and all the shots were at a bizarre distance that wasn't close enough to be a close up and wasn't far enough away to actually capture what was in the scene. That little minx in the glasses and the pleated skirt was the highlight by far
>That little minx in the glasses and the pleated skirt was the highlight by far
of course she was
and at one point she gets covered in some goo that melts off her spider suit so she is naked.
And also forces her to orgasm
but she figures out a way to use her spiderweb to cover herself so it looks like a fullbody fishnet stocking
That happened with the Silk character which is kino coom material.
>final boss battle
>she's all beaten up and sweaty and her suit is torn
>sydney's tummy and slight cleavage on display
$500 million opening weekend
I like the cut of your jib.
How about casting a woman with an actually cute/pretty face and big breasts and you still gross just as much if not more
nah thats dogshit they should've used her for Blackcat. This movie is going to tank everyone's career. kek
umm
wh
where..
where would the webs squirt from?
asking for me
Real
Once again coomer clarity sees all
that means they're going to cut OP's shill check from one cent to $0.00
now now, don't be mean. many respected individuals work for $0.00
These "respected individuals"... Are they in the thread with us right now?
Can they stop making capeshit already holy frick I’m so tired of it
It's the only audience that still trusts them. Pretty much everyone else has turned Hollywood out. Once in a while when they do put out something that's not capeshit, it almost always fails. Partially because they use capeshit people to make the non-capeshit movie, and partially because they think insulting and aggravating potential customers is a brilliant marketing strategy. The only audience they know how to market to and please is the capeshit crowd. Maybe once every couple of years some old boomercore movie gets a sequel and they manage to keep the studio and capeshit part of the staff from coating it with too much woke crap and that movie does ok but for the most part, capeshit is all Hollywood can make now.
Audiences don't have taste and get what they deserve. This means anyone who loves cinema suffers.
Aside from the last Guardians of the Galaxy and blacktinx animated Spidey they're not making money off even capeshit anymore. Horror is the only consistently profitable movie genre left
>holy frick I’m so tired of it
then:
>don't watch them
>don't talk about them
But i know that's going to be impossible for you, autistic frick.
I'm tired of people saying "then don't watch it", like the medium isn't getting flooded with an endless spew of complete dogshit and idpol propaganda just because I'm ignoring it. Fricking toddler logic.
tbh they kinda have
i mean the only capeshit that still has any momentum is probably the boys, and even that i heard got worse (i never watched it)
it's video games that are up next on the chopping block because mario made a lot of money, i can't wait to see how bad that fallout show is gonna be
The trailer didn’t look great, let’s be real. Dakota Johnson (fifty shades) is bad marketing for what Disney made a family brand. They could have pulled it off with Sweeney in a generic clone. But they hired ladies from adult series that conservatives hate.
Why would conservatives hate essentially pron movies?
They aren’t going to go out and spend on the stars of Euphoria and Fifty Shades. They like all American stuff like Top Gun.
morons in middle America who don’t know Cinemaphile or /misc/ exists are exactly the kind of people to go see the latest cape shit like the brain dead automatons that they are, wtf are you talking about?
this movie has absolutely nothing to do with Disney you fricking moron
To be fair, the people starring in it only signed on because they thought it was Disney.
>they thought it was Disney.
They thought it was the MCU, but same difference. Two of them fired their agents including Dakota Johnson.
kek Sony do it all the time. Devilish Sony.
It's crazy that not even the MCU actors know the difference between their shit and Sony's shit.
I still remember Gwenyth Paltrow's interview where she didnt even know her character was in Spider-Man Homecoming. She was just asked to film so she came down. She didn't even know she was in Avengers Endgame. None of them have any idea wtf is going on in the MCU its pretty clear.
i've had a fun time acting in amateur stuff. if i chose it as a career, and then had to do 'promotion' on top where i talk about how much Laserman meant to me as a kid etc. it would honestly put me off the job entirely.
I read that Johnson called Olsen for advice as well, before accepting the film. I'll telling you, it's a nepobaby cult.
Who else would she call? Some dude at Home Depot?
Should have called Kevin
Or she called a person she knows who is in Marvel movies.
>for what Disney made a family brand
This is a Sony movie
>Dakota Johnson (fifty shades) is bad marketing for what Disney made a family brand
>They could have pulled it off with Sweeney
Yeah fortunately Sydney Sweeney is only known for wholesome family-friendly stuff
already saw it, fuuuck, Madame Web 2 when???
still not losing as much money as The Marvels
>25 million
I don't believe you, how can that many people actually go to watch this shit
>marvel shit
>less than 160m budget
pls madame, come back, we need you
No way, that's real? Hahhaa!
It is. Incredibly cheesy.
Why didn't they just make it a spoof comedy or something? They hired the most meme actresses on Earth.
no way
It honestly looks alright compared to what she wears at the end of the movie.
>I have now become Madame Webb™
Bruce, it's me. Madam web
Should have borrowed some of her dad's.
At this point i think the original Madam web's glasses from the cartoon could have worked better for the movie.
Or considering that Dakota seems to not even like this, replaced her with old lady that guided the other girls
90s cartoon Madame Web is not the original vrsion of the character, not even remotely close
It is however the best
Was suppose to be set in early 2000s but looks like she jumped back to the 80s.
>will make 25m
A lot more than I expected.
does this mean the marvels are a bigger bomb?
The Marvels is a bigger bomb because it cost about 3x as much to make. This will make less at the box office. Out of the 3 female superhero team ups Birds of Prey is the most successful
>Out of the 3 female superhero team ups Birds of Prey is the most successful
>Out of the 3 female superhero team ups Birds of Prey is the most successful
I know, I know but it's true
Will this earn less than The Marvels?
Yes. That 25mil is over 6 days as well. Including Valentine's day
It will double when we watch for the second time.
Twitter is finally turning against Dakota now
I mean come on, ya gotta laugh. DJ is roasting this film, intentionally, unintentionally, idk, but it's funny AF.
she just seems like a miserable b***h
Kek, that's how everyone feels about nepo kids. They're the worst! Entitled pricks.
But still, Dakota is the lead and carried the film. She doesn't have time to gossip with 20 yr olds.
I could save her.
Nah she's just got a wry sense of humour, all of her interviews are taking the piss.
It's like a brit was somehow born in texas to hollywood stars
whatever helps you cope, Dakota
That's like 85% of all women, bro. The rest are straight up psychotic.
It's a joke moron
Moner went to DC before this even came out. Gunn should cast Sweeney as Powergirl
>Powergirl
We're really gonna get every dumbass capeshitter ever aren't we
Yes
oh god i love her
Based Dakota will never even know.
Yeah I saw a good movie in here: Adam Scott is perfectly suited to dry humor with Dakota and you could tell they were clicking and the girls were working pretty well together too. If Cassie could just develop her Final Destination abilities and just run with that into the spidergirls where they were more superheroish against a less underwhelming villain I think there is a pretty good film.
>women can't be fu-ACK
she looks like her dad but with a wig and some makeup, kek
I thought it was a good movie. 9.5/10
That's the most money a movie starring 4 spider women has ever made. It's a huge record breaking success!
Really only 80M$? Maybe this can at least break even if people don't have anything else to see with international release, but barely
It won't dude. Its doing worse than Morbius.
>Really only 80M$? Maybe this can at least break even if people don't have anything else to see with international release, but barely
it's got 12 more days to make money before it gets atomized by Dune
Oh my god i forgot about Dune 2, any movie don't make their money back in the next two weeks is getting pulverize
if you're going to greenlit this shit, you have to go heavy in on Sweeney coom factor. New pictures of her go viral on Twitter. If you don't, you're just throwing your money away
I don't really get the ending. She implies uncle Ben is gonna have to take care of Peter. But can't she just save Mary and Richard and not have Peter end up an orphan?
>hiding their sexy bodies completely
No thanks
I get that the old haggard one can see the future but what powers do the other three even have?
They don't actually have powers in the movie. It's just in her and the villain's visions of the future. Sydney shoots some sort of elemental energy beam that seems to work sort of like a web. The black one has the Iron Spider claws coming out of her back except they look organic. I'm not sure about the latina. I think she might just have Spider-Mans general abilities.
By the comics her spider-stiff is tech, like grapple hooks and the like.
Sydney and the other are comic faithful so she likely is too
>comic faithful
Really? I guess power wise. Because THIS is Mattie Franklin in the comics. They took the look of a vlack girl from an Elelctric Company book and the giant fro. Guess they might bot legally have the rights to the name from the comics co-produced with PBS.
I barely remember Mattie. I was reading Mayday Parker books back then.
>It's just in her and the villain's visions of the future
This is the most idiotic thing. There's no way this thing's getting a sequel so it's all just a teaser for nothing
I just rechecked and the latina seems to throw thing green thing but it's not clear to me what it does.
shot web
Why are there so many goddamn Spidermans now? Every time I catch a glimpse of a new movie there's like 5 new characters in a Spider suit jumping around
>Why are there so many goddamn Spidermans now?
Sony has to keep making Spider-Man movies or they lose the rights to the characters.
Yes but that's not the only reason or Spiderverse would be enough. These morons truly believe they can have their own shared universe
Broken record anon, chill out on that. Per all your posts they need 1 Spidey film every 5 years to keep the rights.
They don't need to make Madame Webb and Morbius or Venom 2. They have a Spidey film every few years. They're making garbage films just to keep Spiderman? I don't think so.
Yeah but even in the movies themselves there's a bunch of characters in spidey suits
no midriffs or cleavage at all
See you in the sequel
we were robbed of bare tummy kino
Moner would have rocked that too
Moner and the black chick have open midriffs nearly the entire movie, and there's a scene where they teach Sweeney how to tie the bottom of her shirt.
Nah, Peter has to be there when Uncle Ben's rice is finished cooking or he won't become the Spider-Man he needs to be
Why the frick does sweeneys costume not have cleavage do they actually hate money
Post the cpr scene.
Dakota doesn't deserve this
@BIDEN
@TRUMP
@FBI
@SCOTUS
DO SOMETHING
got a laugh out of me
why does this movie make everyone so mad? i don't think i've ever seen such a vitriolic reaction to a movie in my life
Mad? Anon everyone is mocking it, people can believe they made such a low quality movie, people that have seen it, say it's like cw show in term of quality
It's wild but /misc/tards have reached the point where they hate anything pop culture because it's made by their self identified enemies the "Liberal Lefty israelites!" So they now waste as much time here as on /misc/ screeching about movies and tv shows and hoping for there failure so they can shitpost about a win in the "culture war" they think they're in.
how is this thread /misc/
you’re stupid
>/pol/kiddie must defend /misc/ at all times
Calm down Alinksy. You're old news.
>call anything I don't like /misc/, even if it isn't, and if anyone calls me out on it I'll accuse them of being /misc/ and no one will disagree with me in fear of also being accused of being /misc/
Nice way to cover your bases, lad.
>a win in the "culture war" they think they're in.
Alinsky's Rules for Radicals:
Always accuse your opponent of what you yourself are doing
>There's no "culture war", silly goy!
>srs tho, stop fighting the culture war
No.
the movie sucks dick, AND it's woke
and they thought a woke dick sucking piece of shit could ride on the coattails of Spider-Man
it's infuriating, Amy Pascal must pay
you saw it?
No one is mad, except Sony. Everyone is laughing at it because it is so poorly made. A rare instance when everyone can mock a modern movie without critics or studios dismissing the negative reviews by saying they are form trolls, incels, russian bots, nazis etc
Spider Mexican Maisie Williams
They should have kids together.
Pulling a Final Destination rip off on a marvel movie could have been a great chance but it got wasted.
would
WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM ME
WHY DO YOU CARE FOR ME
WHERE DID YOU GO
M U Y
P R O N T O
That means very pronto, for the non Spanish speakers here.
Why did it need a budget of 85 million?
Also, is the movie about pic related? Why is she some young girl instead being this ancient mystical element?
Because it's her origin
peter parker is born at the end so it's set like 20 years minimum prior to any spider-man film
>origin
>peter parker is born at the end so it's set like 20 years minimum prior to any spider-man film
but it clearly seems set in the modern era! How does that work out?
It's set in 2003.
It does NOT look like it at all.
>2003
How does the math work?! Is this in canon with the other Sony films? They should be set in the 90's or whenever Holland was born.
It's not in continuity with any other Spider thing. It's standalone.
Tom Holland's Spider-Man is in high-school in the first movie which takes place in 2016. That would make him 13 which doesn't really add up.
But this is supposed to be set in his universe. Although that would make it part of the MCU. I don't really know. And my guess is neither do the people who made this.
Snöyverse is disconnected from the MCU. There isn't a Spider-Man yet
>There isn't a Spider-Man yet
What are you suggesting
They're clearly ready to get a Spider-Man in and it isn't Peter Parker
>Avi Arad
I thought that Black person retired ages ago
>Amy Pascal
WHY IS SHE STILL EMPLOYED FRICK
>Snöyverse is disconnected from the MCU.
No it's directly linked. Venom was in No Way Home. Vulture went over to Morbius. Marvel shouldn't have gotten into bed with Sony in the first place
You're moronic. Venom came from another universe. It's disconnected.
>It's another universe that directly interacted with this universe. They aren't connected though!
I'm sure Marvel wishes they weren't but they opened the door for this shit. It's all part of their multiverse now
You mean the hit box office sensations of the SPUMC (Sony Pictures Universe of Marvel Characters) ?!
NYC from 1990-2010 looks identical outside two major towers vanishing
((studios)) couldn't film two people sitting at a table without spending $50 mil on it, or at least that's what their books would say. It's honestly shocking they didn't spend at least $100 mil on this thing although I think they knew it was a turd to begin with so they tried to skimp where they could
>Black person character is uppity
Who is this? A Spiderman sidekick?
ayo based digits
This image is unnerving, so I'm adding it to my collection
Drop a link to your treasures, chief!
Not yet. I'm missing various Bateman pictures. Some elude me due to my work schedule. If you have more, you are welcome to share
In return, have this one, I don't see it so often nowadays
If they were smart they'd just market Sweeneys gigantic breasts whichever way possible. It worked for that shitty romcom she recently did which grossed $151 million globally.
to be fair i did enjoy that flick. even tho she just showed a bit of sidebooba
they hate money. We could have had a black cat movie that was bordering rated R from the amount of sex appeal and I guarantee it would break 300m easily
My favorite part of the movie was when the other girls had to teach Sydney Sweeny how to dress sexy. Do girls like her actually exist? Big booba but still shy and sweet?
And then they all did a table dance.
Reviews are really all over the place, some are saying its so bad its good, like they laughed a lot maybe I will check it out just to throw Sony a few bucks.
i thought web's powers were fun. now i want a madame web x doctor strange movie.
A bunch of 'who's' in a worn out genre. Who could have imagined it would fail?
My capeshit fatigue is only exceeded by my aspiring rapper fatigue.
Bob Marley beat this movie. I'm won't even call it Marvel, it's a Sony movie just using D list Marvel characters.
>spider man is a culturally appropriating racist in the movie
>the movie was so dry it needed lots of quips like other comic book movies
im so desperate for reactions i ended up reading a reddit discussion thread about it and wish i didnt. these people are insufferable buttholes.
lol
Egypt was entertaining schlock, Power Rangers was a perfectly fine kids movie, Morbius wasn't as bad as it's meme reputation said.
That's not a really a damning list at all.
>have sex demons as your leads
>don't get their breasts or asses out
>only positive element is some tummy
It was meant to fail
I heard that the girls were in their skin tight costumes for like one minutes of the entire movie.
Like wtf were they thinking?
The skin tight outfits cover everything too. They're also visions of the future so no skin tight action in the main plot.
With how woke Hollywood is, skin tights suits is as good as we could hope for these days.
who cares they look sexier on instagram anyway. For this movie to be a hit all 3 should be naked and fingering each other for 90 mins.
>Could have had Sweeney play big tiddy Black Cat in a Spider-Man sequel
>We get girlpower shit without Spider-Man instead
Capitalism is a meme
i may be schizophrenic but i think they re-used footage from Spider-Man 2 and Spider-Man 3 during the end montage
like for example this scene from the 0:11 time mark
Never watched No Way Home but didn't that one blatantly reuse footage of characters from the Raimi/TASM films? If they're willing to do that for actual spider-man films then they'll happily do it for these shitty spin-offs
Kinda like I said here
Disney is like naw, the Raimiverse/Amazingverse characters belong to us now. I know Sony gets a cut of these billion dollar Spidey films. But it just seems like Disney bullies them around.
What a weird time to be alive, every new cape shit movie is bombing and setting an all time bomb record and then the following month it's beaten by another capeshit movie
Isn't it odd how the movie implies Peter is a racist bigot because his suit is so similar to the ancient tribal masks the Mayans use at the beginning of the movie? What is it with Sony making their biggest cashcow a problematic prick?
Anyone can wear le mask but it's more suited to PoC especially Miles Morales, the bestest of all Spider-Men.
I don't believe you for a second
the spider comes from peru and the ones bitten by the spider wear some superheroesque outfits that look like spider-man's outfit with the webs being replaced by small vines. yeah it's pretty fricking bad.
13% now
Jared Leto must be relieved
>Least insane Madame Web line readings compilation
https://twitter.com/boxdposters/status/1758270871901528380
This movie actually is funny, intentionally. She says
>my mother actually died, in childbirth
and happily gestures to the pregnant lady listening
madame web? more like mommy web.
instead yhey used her shitty new costume
from her shitty new comics
>latinx
FRICK MARVEL
Wasn’t this literally a joke in ‘Domino’ by Tony Scott, combined with other terms fir people of interracial heritage?
Try to ask someone from latin america to pronounce that latinx abomination, it makes no sense. Why the need to 'educate' from other cultures and languages?
It would absolutely be a shit movie, but this time big breasts will bring in coomers. It will unironically do fine at the box office.
all these superhero movies and shows look like pure garbage for many fricking years now it's hilarious only now people are semi realizing and affecting their gross
>15 mln
It might eventually make $25 million.
I am guessing opening week will be less.
True, I think people are overestimating its take this week because it made some money on Valentine's Day, the day when tons of couples go to the movies and nothing else new is really playing
>entire cast is a bunch of semen demons
>zero lust provoking scenes
>wokescold shit about spider man being racist
This is just getting embarrassing now.
>>zero lust provoking scenes
They literally dance on tables for a team of football chads.
>Will only make 25 million this week.
So long as it's entirely white men's fault and in no way can we blame any woman for not going to see it!
It's completely out of touch marketing. It's true that women are much bigger consumers than men and most industries today target them, but a fricking spiderman movie with a bunch of hot chicks in tight little outfits is not something girls give a shit about. They had all the ingredients to make a good movie. Casting Moner, Sweeney and Dakota Johnson it's as if Cinemaphile was the head casting director
>Moner
The one in the movie is a different Isabella tho.
Which i didn't mind personally. I found the SpiderLatina more visually pleasant than the rest.
Are you making a joke here or do you really not know that they're the same person? She changed her name
Are you some kind of imbecile?
She changed her name to Isabela Merced for some reason. But it's the same person.
Because her name rhymed with boner. It's only a stage name anyway, her legal name remains Moner.
Wonka opens $40m vs budget $125m. Madame Web will be fine
You're a moronic c**t. Actually have a nice day
I thought it was a great movie. 9.5/10
December releases open low and have long legs. Wonka had great word of mouth Madame Web isn't a December film and word of mouth is terrible.
This will probably do great internationally and leave all the americans confused.
The Marvels did that on a budget of 250 million.
80M isn't that bad of a budget, they can break even I think
Can someone give me one reason why it's more important to make a politically correct movie than a movie that people want to see? I thought the goal of these companies was to make money, not to "educate the public". Have these people never thought about how they look to anyone who isn't ideologically aligned with them? Imagine if one day a nazi comes to you and starts preaching about race realism while his nazi friends try to gaslight you into thinking that you are wrong. That's essentially how it feels to be preached down to from these companies.
Message and demoralization, not money
Yes it really is that simple.
>Can someone give me one reason why it's more important to make a politically correct movie than a movie that people want to see? I
The middle and upper management has been captured by idiot women who follow feminist ideology. They hit critical mass idiot feminist women a few years ago.
> I thought the goal of these companies was to make money, not to "educate the public".
On paper, but if your middle and upper management are dominated by idiot women who feel it is their goal to make movies people OUGHT to see rather than think about what audiences want, then you're setting yourself up for failure.
They are all twitter addicts, and they love to make movies to dunk on the chuds, which they see as this mass of internet losers. But they genuinely think these are an improvement over past films.
>nothing meme-worthy, no "have sex" moment
>the spider-women aren't even in costume except for a 40-second dream sequence
sounds like fricking garbage and I'm glad it's bombing
I saw the Black spider woman with the fro and immediately knew I'd never watch this slop
Woke Disney keeps flopping
Madame Flop is from Sony
I want to take my 5yo daughter to watch this movie. We’ve enjoyed no way home and dr strange. Will we enjoy this? (Also is this please wait a while garbage a permanent feature now).
A bunch of people get killed on screen in this one which might be a bit too disturbing for a five year old.
I say go for it! After the Marvels and Madame Webb, you won't see girl power team up capeshit ever again.
Last chance!
This movie really isn't a "girl power team up".
That's what it was promoted as. And it didn't help that the trailer came the same week as The Marvels.
Doesn't matter what the truth is. Only perception matters. And to the world, this is just another "Birds of Prey".
>That's what it was promoted as.
It literally wasn't.
>Only perception matters.
Yours in the perception of a schizo. Nobody cares.
You seem like you care, too much. Pull the tampon out of your ass troony, you'll never be a woman!
MADDAM
WIW
hehe
Isn't it kinda fricked up that the main villain has a better looking spidey suit than the main Spider-Man guy?
That suit looks like shit
Looks better than Tom Holland's.
I have no stakes in this. You just have shit taste in suits if the only thing you like about it is that it's better than Disney slop
moron. I didn't say I like it. I said it was better. Go back to school, ESL.
>Immediately goes into the defensive when called out on his taste for slop
Lol
who would win
dakota is sexier in the first one
Maddam WiW has a slight touch of fetal alcohol syndrome, Emaame Beeb is a downie. I say Wiw.
Madame Wew
Why does she look like an Indian, when her parents are Don Johnson and Melanie Griffith?
SONY has to bend the knee and just sell the property to Marvel at this point right?
what even was the last superhero movie with a straight white male lead who wasn't a idiot/manchild who gets rescued or beaten up by strong wyman side characters who are the actual heroes of the movie?
You know whats fricking funny?
There is still no Plot Synopsis written on its Wikipedia page. Its been released for 2 days now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madame_Web_(film)#Plot
No real human has seen it yet
Doesn't Sony have interns who do that shit? I mean, according to Cinemaphile, shills are ITT. If that's true, then why has no one updated the Wiki?
>I dont really want to be a father, its rather just be an Uncle Ben
The album that Toxic was released on came out in November 2003 but the movie takes places during summer or at the very latest early autumn of 2003.
Did they frick it up or is it possible the song would have been played on the radio earlier?
They apparently fricked up the timeline of the story and had to change the period it was set in after filming, it was set in the 90s and they changed it to the 2000's. That's why they had to re-dub the villains lines, and also did some cgi to replace items that were clearly 90s items.
It's kinda crazy that Disney won't let Sony use Tom Holland. The idea essentially was that they share the character.
Holland is under contract with Sony, not Marvel. Very strange situation.
>That's why they had to re-dub the villains lines
Not only that, they would have had to redo most of his scenes since he's entire plan relies on facial recognition software that he runs with a stolen NSA pass to find the spider girls.
I haven't watched it but I want to know every instance where they try "foreshadowing" Spider-Man and his lore including the funny lines
Damn... One Love made almost as much money on Thursday alone as Madame Web is projected to make through the 5 day opening carrying into Monday...
From the Sony leaks prior to Amazing Spider-Man 2
Reading things like this makes it really clear why so many of these movies are bad.
>the wagies trying to block the gigantic screen
based ai
I don't get it
I don't know if this the spanish tagline or the cast
So did Disney do some kinda contract frickery when they agreed to co-produce last couple of spiderman films with sony and now Sony can't do a live action spiderman film?
Why bother with these attempted spin offs where he doesn't even show up when every actual spiderman film makes bank?
This movie has been out for three days and no one has bothered to add a plot summary to wikipedia. This is the most dead movie of all time.
This is the new chud metric for failure? Embarrassing.
No the post above yours is the metric for failure
That's good since you're stealing your jokes from Reddit.
https://www.reddit.com/r/moviescirclejerk/comments/1as827r/its_official_no_one_at_wikipedia_will_ever_see/
What joke homosexual? The hard fact of how little it earned?
Ever notice how when reddit joke stealers get called out they shout "homosexual" and "Black person" to insist they fit in?
I was talking about this post moron
No wonder you know what's happening on reddit. You need to go back
Yes, we all saw how you tried to hijack someone else's post when yours flopped. It was embarrassing for everyone.
>Madame Web” grossed $2.2 million its second day of release
It's never been more over
5 minutes after the theathre and the only two things I can remember are the midriffs and sweeney's mini skirt in thigh highs.
It was just like my japanese anime.
Was Sweeney's outfit meant to be a schoolgirl uniform or do girls really dress that way?
The latina and black chick definitely dressed like a girl would in the early 2000s which was peak tummy kino, but never seen a girl rock the zettai ryouiki meganekko anime girl combo irl.
But can't say I had a problem with it in this movie.
They do between 16-22 when they want to, but they grow out of it pretty fast. Shame.
The black chick's outfit was meant to be a tribute to Avril Lavigne, pretty sure Sweeney's was meant to be a tribute to Britney, especially considering the part where they are dancing to Toxic
Hollywood just needs to cease production of all capeshit and give it a 10-year moratorium. People are sick of this moronic bullshit. Millennials have aged out of it and Zoomers don't care about it.
I coomed so much to this pic. I just wanted to share.
going to be real lads, i had no fricking clue who 'Iron Man' was until there was an Iron Man film.
How many wieners did the director suck for this? I looked her up and she only ever did shitty TV drama. How did she fricking end up at Sony?
KWAB
i have never seen this initialism before
i read it as 'Kill Women At Birth' (and so did you)
I believe it's one of the moron boards trying to leak over. No they never explain it.
kwab
Dakota Johnson $5 million paycheck
Sydney Sweeney $650K
Celeste O’Connor $200K
Isabela Merced $150K
Emma Roberts $800K
madame johnson, u won, lmao
Lmao even the Black girl I never heard of got more than Moner. Back to the tummymines with her.
Why are you automatically believe a random post to be true?
It's called RIFFING you Black person
that was surprising lol, but moner got more upcoming projects i guess
They all made more than the studio will make on the film, sounds like a come up to me
if those numbers are true