they already changed her substantially, I don't see why not
or could in the very least minimize her role until she goes through the motions and then kill her without impacting the plot much
That's a total 50/50. Once you've removed a green ball, the all red box becomes completely irrelevant to the equation. Meaning you have two boxes left and equal chance that the one you've picked from has a red or green ball.
Incorrect. You have to look at it in percent chance of the balls rather than the boxes. Lets call the balls G1, G2, and G3. And the boxes GG, GR, and RR. Obviously, as you pointed out, RR is irrelevant since we know it cant be that one. We know that we have a green ball and being that are 3 green balls total, theres a 33.3% chance each for G1, G2, and G3. Since there are 2 Greens in GG box theres a 66.6% chance that our Green came from GG. Since theres only 1 in GR box theres a 33% chance it came from that box. If the next ball is green, it came from the box that it had a 66% chance of coming out of.
Well it can't be the third box because you've already picked a green one so that one can just be ignored. You've got two boxes you COULD HAVE picked from. One with another green (which has a 100% chance of the next ball being green obviously), and one with a red (which has a 0% chance of being green obviously).
Average probability (100% + 0%) ÷ 2 = 50%
50/50. 1:1. Flip of a coin. Just as likely to be red as it is to be green if you're taking out of the same box again. Easy.
All the morons saying 2/3rds are common core nu-math idiots. You're only taking from one box, so the odds only apply to that box. You're not totaling the balls like a troglodyte because you're aren't dealing with any other box but the one you've ALREADY DRAWN FROM.
All the morons saying 2/3rds are common core nu-math idiots. You're only taking from one box, so the odds only apply to that box. You're not totaling the balls like a troglodyte because you're aren't dealing with any other box but the one you've ALREADY DRAWN FROM.
I know math can be hard for you guys sometimes. I tried to explain it in a way even people like yourselves could understand.
What an awful costume! Definitely doesn't help to have an angry monkey expression in this shot, but I doubt anyone is going to look attractive in that burlap sack of an outfit.
She would still be a sulking b***h that coddles him when he's weak and resents him when he's no longer sick Elizabethan boy.
Just a really suck "addition" that exists to rob one character to try and prop up another.
Also this was a shit adaptation, if the goal was to be faithful to the book at this point in the story Paul is struggling to retain his humanity because infinity is stretching out before him and he can see everything.
I will play here UwU
she's perfect
>she's perfect
For which genre?
Pornography, ideally in some sort of leather mask that covers her face
No. She's gorgeous.
Why the frick does she look hot here? But look like shit in the movie
Cause Dennis is a hack
Or he's not making a movie for you to jerk off to
Wig.
AI
She doesn't, it's all smoke and mirrors.
Potato.jpg
Because they cast her in a face-heavy role where her body was covered 24/7, they also forced her to have natural hair. moronic.
Frick you israelite
Give AI a couple of years and you'll be able to dignify any movie seamlessly
cry bout it
Do not associate Doug with your degenerate filmmaking.
Doug is a degenerate although.
Wrong.
Can't recast when she's already been in two movies
better question is, can we kill her off screen or is she important later on?
they already changed her substantially, I don't see why not
or could in the very least minimize her role until she goes through the motions and then kill her without impacting the plot much
Third one will be her last appearance. Unless Dennis will do a switcheroo and give Chani Irulan's plot
Lets check the IQ of the average Duncgay
13/52ths
sorry I meant ½
2/3
At least theres one smart person here
That's a total 50/50. Once you've removed a green ball, the all red box becomes completely irrelevant to the equation. Meaning you have two boxes left and equal chance that the one you've picked from has a red or green ball.
Incorrect. You have to look at it in percent chance of the balls rather than the boxes. Lets call the balls G1, G2, and G3. And the boxes GG, GR, and RR. Obviously, as you pointed out, RR is irrelevant since we know it cant be that one. We know that we have a green ball and being that are 3 green balls total, theres a 33.3% chance each for G1, G2, and G3. Since there are 2 Greens in GG box theres a 66.6% chance that our Green came from GG. Since theres only 1 in GR box theres a 33% chance it came from that box. If the next ball is green, it came from the box that it had a 66% chance of coming out of.
It's 2/3. Monty hall paradox.
Well it can't be the third box because you've already picked a green one so that one can just be ignored. You've got two boxes you COULD HAVE picked from. One with another green (which has a 100% chance of the next ball being green obviously), and one with a red (which has a 0% chance of being green obviously).
Average probability (100% + 0%) ÷ 2 = 50%
50/50. 1:1. Flip of a coin. Just as likely to be red as it is to be green if you're taking out of the same box again. Easy.
All the morons saying 2/3rds are common core nu-math idiots. You're only taking from one box, so the odds only apply to that box. You're not totaling the balls like a troglodyte because you're aren't dealing with any other box but the one you've ALREADY DRAWN FROM.
Look up Bertrand's box moron. You can literally run simulations that prove it.
I know math can be hard for you guys sometimes. I tried to explain it in a way even people like yourselves could understand.
69
What an awful costume! Definitely doesn't help to have an angry monkey expression in this shot, but I doubt anyone is going to look attractive in that burlap sack of an outfit.
Why did her squad have this specific elephant ballsack atheism armour while everyone else looked half decent?
because your autistic
She would still be a sulking b***h that coddles him when he's weak and resents him when he's no longer sick Elizabethan boy.
Just a really suck "addition" that exists to rob one character to try and prop up another.
Also this was a shit adaptation, if the goal was to be faithful to the book at this point in the story Paul is struggling to retain his humanity because infinity is stretching out before him and he can see everything.
Normies are so braindead their natural instincts for aesthetics can be rewritten by their telescreen usage
She's perfect
They're the same picture.
That's just Joseph Gordon Levitt on the right
For her looks, she was well cast. But she has no range. She's no Chani. Just Zendaya.
If it makes you feel better she dies on the next movie
Sure pal, Denis here, who would you like to cast? Say the name and I'll get right onto it