Most people who've seen Jackie Brown agree with me. The people who don't think Jackie Brown is his best movie are mostly those who haven't even seen it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
It’s not even that good of a movie shut your dumb ass up. You’re probably a 20 year old who feels mature by saying Jackie brown is the best movie. Shut up pleb
2 years ago
Anonymous
>It’s not even that good of a movie
I never said it was great, dumbass. Holy shit you are dumb. I said it was his best movie.
2 years ago
Anonymous
lol see what I mean. You’re one of these homosexuals who thinks he’s mature for liking it
[...]
2 years ago
Anonymous
literally completely false
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Most people who've seen Jackie Brown agree with me
False. >The people who don't think Jackie Brown is his best movie are mostly those who haven't even seen it.
Only true if they've also never seen any of his other movies. Also, takes like that are why I called you a pseud in the first place.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Oh, you also said it's his only movie worth watching a second time. Which is another contrarian take.
jackie brown isn't really a tarantino movie, it's tarantino for people that don't like tarantino, whether you like it or not, it shouldn't really count
>jackie brown isn't really a tarantino movie
It has Samuel L Jackson giving irrelevant monologues filled with cursing, so I'd say it's typical of Tarantino's characteristic style.
>Samuel L Jackson giving irrelevant monologues filled with cursing
literally every samuel l jackson movie ever made, and not every one of them was made by tarantino
No, Kill Bill is by far his biggest piece of shit, followed very closely by Hateful Eight.
Both are just excuses for Tarantino to explore his favorite fetishes.
KB was his foot fetish with the stupid fricking "wiggle your big toe" shit.
H8 was his undying fetish for watching Sam Jackson face frick white people.
Then ending just wasn't very good, Django should've gone on a rampage the moment his german friend died. Instead we get a bunch of pointless scenes to get him back to where he was initially.
What's his obsession with brutally killing whitey and making kill whitey hate porn for Black folk? So weird he hates his mom for being a black panther groupie but does this shit.
Far too convoluted
All the actors are trying to win Oscars for being “dramatic” rather than portraying realistic characters
Excessive dialogue brings the movie to a halt constantly while characters argue about nothing
That being said the music and visuals are great
>All the actors are trying to win Oscars for being “dramatic” rather than portraying realistic characters
You know there are different styles of acting and emotional realism, through various schools, is a meme that took over in the 70s and became hegemonic, right?
That and his Dirty Harry reviews. He should stick to reviewing old action movies and stay away from commenting on current stuff, He comes across as a raging edgelord when he does it since he shits on even the good stuff.
I don't really get his opinion after time it just seems like he sucks the wiener of older shit and flagrantly writes off anything if it doesn't fit his niche.
He seems to genuinely believe anyone who likes something he doesn't or vice versa is a leftist SJW cuck who voted for Hillary. He's like the average Cinemaphile user without the irony.
I remember I called him one in one of his videos I think it was the Blade Runner one actually and he literally banned me from commenting on his channel. Not advising anyone should but if you go to his Twitter and just search contrarian and use the search bar you'll see how many times he complains about it, it's over a dozen lol.
This guy is hilariously contrarian. I've been subscribed to him since like 2012 and he almost unfailingly shits on everything popular. It's impressive.
Every scene he's ever made has been an 'homage' to something. Always uses music he ripped off another movie that sounds moronic in his modern movie but his audience suspends their disbelief because they think it's a skill to not be original. The kind of homosexual who gets off just by saying "spaghetti western".
Bullshit. Every kino part of Butch's story is violence. Once the violence stops, you get cringe dialogue about blueberry pancakes from some moronic women that QT has a fetish for.
2 years ago
Anonymous
We're just gonna ignore his obvious desperation to get him and his girl out? And his violence is only ever a means to an end. He runs Marcellus over because Wallace is trying to kill him. He goes back to the basement because he's showing a kindness to Wallace. He only kills Vincent because he's under his the impression Vincent is trying to kill him.
Butch is still a sympathetic character without the violence
2 years ago
Anonymous
His desperation to what? Avoid violence? LOL >"Throw fight or I'll kill you" >Kill opponent in ring >Kill hitman >Run over crime boss >Kill two rapists
Then QT makes the woman annoying to the point where I don't really care if they escape. It's all just violence porn with QT.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Butch isn't a irredeemably violent butthole he's a dude in a shitty situation who is trying to escape with girlfriend with three obstacles in his way that he can only use violence to resort to. I genuinely don't understand how you can say his films are merely a catalyst to splooge violence and gore over the screen. I can just think of so many scenes that have no contextual violence to it whatsoever. I feel like a thought you were saying were true there would be a lot more of it and it would be a lot more gratuitous
>I think so.
I mean sure. It's not a bad movie by any standard, it's just a bad Tarantino movie.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Elaborate
2 years ago
Anonymous
So many scenes and you name none. And yeah, QT totally doesn't use gratuitous violence LOL.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm sorry am I supposed to be giving you a dissertation on why I like Tarantino films at 9:44 in the morning? Literally look at any scene in his earlier films that doesn't involve any sort of violence or threats happening and my point will be proven.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You made my point for me: you can't provide a scene that doesn't rely on violence because it literally doesn't exist.
2 years ago
Anonymous
That's braindead. If you really want one of the opening to reservoir dogs is a perfect example of a scene that doesn't rely on violence that I find incredibly memorable. At that time they're literally just guys at a diner shooting the shit. That's our introduction to them.
sort of, but he's held back by being a hardcore libertarian, arguing that "government bad" and fascists are the same as communists and shit like that. I still remember him mentioning off-hand in one video that Japan is safer because it's an ethno-state.
I will cease when Tarantino makes a movie that isn't just a gloss of another movie but with cool music and people in meme clothes saying "frick" and "Black person" while killing people. >so never, I guess
Current day anime (or at least 90% of it) is so shit that the weebs that drool over it deserve mockery. Most of the shows in a given season are the same 2 or 3 ideas (isekai with likely harem, rom-coms with likely harem and magic/sci-fi/superhero show with non-sensical/contradictory rules) and the other 10% have good ideas to them but falter in some way (usually when it comes to explaining lore or concluding). I watch this shit but would never, ever recommend it.
Also not that are really matters but Tarantino is lucky that his films are both stylish and good
Anyways anyone who disagrees is a contrarian b***h boy who needs to go watch movies without a stick in their ass. I'm going to bed, you morons can argue in the thread some more though
queertin homosexualino is so low iq that he could not predict the internet in the early 90s and the fact that most people would be able to watch and recognize the movies he ripped off. he foolishly thought only the critics would notice.
also everybody in his flicks talks too much.
also everybody in his flicks autistically talks about some surface level tv shows and cartoons.
also IMAGINE making a ww2 film but than have it revolve around MORE characters talking about - MOVIES. yes queertin, you possess a surface level knowledge on german cinema from the 20s and 30s. much wow!
p.s. i hope queertin homosexualino falls into a bottomless pit
Pulp Fiction 9/10 (S)
Reservoir Dogs 8.5/10 (A)
Kill Bill 8/10 (A)
The Hateful Eight 7.5/10 (B)
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood 7/10 (B)
Death Proof 7/10 (B)
Django Unchained 6.5/10 (C)
Jackie Brown 6/10 (C)
Inglorious Basterds 5.5/10 (D)
It's not even the best Elmore Leonard adaptation. It's why Tarrantino decided to stick to directing his own material--how sluggish he made Leonard's plot mechanics and (usually slightly cartoonish) interpersonal dynamics come off. It's not bad but it was outside the wheelhouse and felt overly restrained (which is bad coming from a director whose major schtick is going balls out). You could argue you like it for that reason but saying it's his best film is contrarian nonsense--all the qualities he's known for are muted and there's, at least relatively, no chemistry when everything is taken as a whole. Jackie Brown is still good but it's less than the sum of its parts.
homosexualino's best is still much worse than bay's worst. homosexualino makes films for manhattan critics and dnc staffers. bay makes films for boys and men.
People who discover art, including cinema, emulates previous stories and scenes tend to be midwits. They go "AHA this scene Kubrick stole from Phantom Carriage" when it is a clear, deliberate shot by shot allusion to a previous work.
yeah
Why was Django his worst movie
Not that it's good anyway I can definitely see why this board would especially hate it
>le ebil racist whitey crackers getting brutally murdered
lol
It's the second best after pulp
pleb tier opinion kys
Its the first one after Menke passed away and you can tell because it doesn't flow as well as the others.
That's Jackie Brown
Jackie Brown was fun tho
>tho
fricking have a nice day zoomer.
Was it tho?
Jackie Brown is easily his best movie, and the only one I'd consider watching again.
Just because it’s his most mature doesn’t mean it’s his best. That movie is forgettable
>That movie is forgettable
Opposed to every other scene in every other Tarantino movie becoming a gay meme
>SAY WHAT AGAIN, SAY WHAT AGAIN MOTHERFRICKER
yawn
>Pseud contrarian
You think you've earned that hot take but you're wrong about it.
>no argument
My argument is that you're a pseud and are confusing a contrarian opinion as a thought-out take. Simple as.
Except there is nothing contrarian about anything I said.
>Jackie Brown is Tarantino's best movie isn't contrarian.
You're moronic.
Most people who've seen Jackie Brown agree with me. The people who don't think Jackie Brown is his best movie are mostly those who haven't even seen it.
It’s not even that good of a movie shut your dumb ass up. You’re probably a 20 year old who feels mature by saying Jackie brown is the best movie. Shut up pleb
>It’s not even that good of a movie
I never said it was great, dumbass. Holy shit you are dumb. I said it was his best movie.
lol see what I mean. You’re one of these homosexuals who thinks he’s mature for liking it
literally completely false
>Most people who've seen Jackie Brown agree with me
False.
>The people who don't think Jackie Brown is his best movie are mostly those who haven't even seen it.
Only true if they've also never seen any of his other movies. Also, takes like that are why I called you a pseud in the first place.
Oh, you also said it's his only movie worth watching a second time. Which is another contrarian take.
jackie brown isn't really a tarantino movie, it's tarantino for people that don't like tarantino, whether you like it or not, it shouldn't really count
>jackie brown isn't really a tarantino movie
It has Samuel L Jackson giving irrelevant monologues filled with cursing, so I'd say it's typical of Tarantino's characteristic style.
>Samuel L Jackson giving irrelevant monologues filled with cursing
literally every samuel l jackson movie ever made, and not every one of them was made by tarantino
No, Kill Bill is by far his biggest piece of shit, followed very closely by Hateful Eight.
Both are just excuses for Tarantino to explore his favorite fetishes.
KB was his foot fetish with the stupid fricking "wiggle your big toe" shit.
H8 was his undying fetish for watching Sam Jackson face frick white people.
Then ending just wasn't very good, Django should've gone on a rampage the moment his german friend died. Instead we get a bunch of pointless scenes to get him back to where he was initially.
he did go on a rampage at that point
>shoots up half the building and only loses due to all his guns going dry while the other guys get reinforcements
>not a rampage
Ok I should've said he should've gone on THE rampage.
What's his obsession with brutally killing whitey and making kill whitey hate porn for Black folk? So weird he hates his mom for being a black panther groupie but does this shit.
That would be Hateful 8.
Far too convoluted
All the actors are trying to win Oscars for being “dramatic” rather than portraying realistic characters
Excessive dialogue brings the movie to a halt constantly while characters argue about nothing
That being said the music and visuals are great
>All the actors are trying to win Oscars for being “dramatic” rather than portraying realistic characters
You know there are different styles of acting and emotional realism, through various schools, is a meme that took over in the 70s and became hegemonic, right?
It's a good movie and I am very racist
His Death Wish reviews were great. Wish he did more stuff like that.
That and his Dirty Harry reviews. He should stick to reviewing old action movies and stay away from commenting on current stuff, He comes across as a raging edgelord when he does it since he shits on even the good stuff.
I don't really get his opinion after time it just seems like he sucks the wiener of older shit and flagrantly writes off anything if it doesn't fit his niche.
he’s a massive contrarian. he fits right in here
He seems to genuinely believe anyone who likes something he doesn't or vice versa is a leftist SJW cuck who voted for Hillary. He's like the average Cinemaphile user without the irony.
>contrarian rages when you call him a contrarian
many such cases.
Where can i find these ?
YouTube?
That's funny how much he hates being called one like he actually loathes it
>That's funny how much he hates being called one like he actually loathes it
probably because it completely invalidates his shitty opinions lol
I remember I called him one in one of his videos I think it was the Blade Runner one actually and he literally banned me from commenting on his channel. Not advising anyone should but if you go to his Twitter and just search contrarian and use the search bar you'll see how many times he complains about it, it's over a dozen lol.
This guy is hilariously contrarian. I've been subscribed to him since like 2012 and he almost unfailingly shits on everything popular. It's impressive.
Inglorius basterds and django were qt at his worst. But qt at his worst is still far above average. Ouatih was pure kino tho
is not like he's hiding that he's making homages, one of his films is literally called Pulp Fiction
Every scene he's ever made has been an 'homage' to something. Always uses music he ripped off another movie that sounds moronic in his modern movie but his audience suspends their disbelief because they think it's a skill to not be original. The kind of homosexual who gets off just by saying "spaghetti western".
Take away the homages and parallels with music and scene setting he still got plenty of organic characters with great natural dialogue
its not actually great though, it justs just better than the focus group dialogue in 99% of modern film.
That consistency has been shown throughout even his older films.
Lol no. There's a reason QT fills his movie with ultraviolence, to distract morons from how bad the rest of his movies are.
You could cut out all the violence from pulp fiction and it'd still be good. RD included.
Bullshit. Every kino part of Butch's story is violence. Once the violence stops, you get cringe dialogue about blueberry pancakes from some moronic women that QT has a fetish for.
We're just gonna ignore his obvious desperation to get him and his girl out? And his violence is only ever a means to an end. He runs Marcellus over because Wallace is trying to kill him. He goes back to the basement because he's showing a kindness to Wallace. He only kills Vincent because he's under his the impression Vincent is trying to kill him.
Butch is still a sympathetic character without the violence
His desperation to what? Avoid violence? LOL
>"Throw fight or I'll kill you"
>Kill opponent in ring
>Kill hitman
>Run over crime boss
>Kill two rapists
Then QT makes the woman annoying to the point where I don't really care if they escape. It's all just violence porn with QT.
Butch isn't a irredeemably violent butthole he's a dude in a shitty situation who is trying to escape with girlfriend with three obstacles in his way that he can only use violence to resort to. I genuinely don't understand how you can say his films are merely a catalyst to splooge violence and gore over the screen. I can just think of so many scenes that have no contextual violence to it whatsoever. I feel like a thought you were saying were true there would be a lot more of it and it would be a lot more gratuitous
>*flosses in your direction*
I think so.
>I think so.
I mean sure. It's not a bad movie by any standard, it's just a bad Tarantino movie.
Elaborate
So many scenes and you name none. And yeah, QT totally doesn't use gratuitous violence LOL.
I'm sorry am I supposed to be giving you a dissertation on why I like Tarantino films at 9:44 in the morning? Literally look at any scene in his earlier films that doesn't involve any sort of violence or threats happening and my point will be proven.
You made my point for me: you can't provide a scene that doesn't rely on violence because it literally doesn't exist.
That's braindead. If you really want one of the opening to reservoir dogs is a perfect example of a scene that doesn't rely on violence that I find incredibly memorable. At that time they're literally just guys at a diner shooting the shit. That's our introduction to them.
Tarantino is fine and you're a contrarian homosexual
Nah, you suck. Baby boy taste. Really embarassing.
>n..noo u
Doesn't matter what the context was
It's definitely memorable
Memorable because it's filled with famous actors. QT knows his dialogue doesn't hold up on it's own which is why he's such a star fricker.
I watched a movie when I was like 15 and I didn't know who anybody was except for buscemi. The scene was memorable because it's good
Your best example is a scene where QT is watering at the mouth over talking about huge dicks.
>you're a contrarian
A contrarian in clown world, you sack of feces.
Tarantino is shit and so is your tatse. Take the L.
lel yeah right. so ebin when two characters spend 5 minutes discussing b-movies from the 50s and cartoons from the 60s over dinner. much depth!
Only the Hollywood one was decent but gotta hand it to troonytino, he knows how to make use of music.
Okay, catboy.
Dead meme. Get something better.
Nyaa~~
>listens to morricone once...
queertin homosexualino is a cringe israelite and Black person lover and wienerholster
Hateful Eight is his best film.
I liked that it felt closer to Reservoir Dogs than Django and it is the only Tarantino movie with an original score.
Dogshit. No.
yikes. another cringe queertin homosexualino blabfest with random narration and tiresome chapters thrown in
I watched Inglorious Bastards when I was 12. I knew it was shit then and I still do.
Django is his best movie.
Only the racist chuds that frequent this board hate it because the racists in that movie got BTFO.
Uhm, sweaty, are you saying the one where heckin Nazis get heckin punched ISN'T the best one? F*cking bigot
Is it even a Tarantino movie if people aren't constantly saying homie
I don't think Razorfist browses /misc/ but I think he sympathizes with a lot of their beliefs.
sort of, but he's held back by being a hardcore libertarian, arguing that "government bad" and fascists are the same as communists and shit like that. I still remember him mentioning off-hand in one video that Japan is safer because it's an ethno-state.
I will cease when Tarantino makes a movie that isn't just a gloss of another movie but with cool music and people in meme clothes saying "frick" and "Black person" while killing people.
>so never, I guess
he's good at writing dialogue, everything else is weak. I can't really speak to his directing skills but he usually gets good stuff out of his actors.
Current day anime (or at least 90% of it) is so shit that the weebs that drool over it deserve mockery. Most of the shows in a given season are the same 2 or 3 ideas (isekai with likely harem, rom-coms with likely harem and magic/sci-fi/superhero show with non-sensical/contradictory rules) and the other 10% have good ideas to them but falter in some way (usually when it comes to explaining lore or concluding). I watch this shit but would never, ever recommend it.
His only good movie is Reservoir Dogs
Reminder that Razorfist barely plays the game's he reviews
He also has a micropenis
he's also not funny
There are people on this board still arguing the case for Tarantino being great goddamn zoomers really did take over
He peaked too soon. He did everything he knew with rdogs and pulp fiction. Nothing more to add after it.
the guy makes cool looking and fun movies, that's all
not every movie has to be a masterpiece
Lmao are you fricking 15?
Thar philosophy rings true for every bullshit b action movie in existence. Literally go be a cinegay somewhere else
Also not that are really matters but Tarantino is lucky that his films are both stylish and good
Anyways anyone who disagrees is a contrarian b***h boy who needs to go watch movies without a stick in their ass. I'm going to bed, you morons can argue in the thread some more though
Contrarian for not liking Tarantinos cringeworthy rip-offs?
Kek I’ve seen it all
he didn't go to film school he went to films
Metal music sucks and is for manchildren, please for the love of god stop shilling your shitty opinions and YT channel on Cinemaphile.
queertin homosexualino is so low iq that he could not predict the internet in the early 90s and the fact that most people would be able to watch and recognize the movies he ripped off. he foolishly thought only the critics would notice.
also everybody in his flicks talks too much.
also everybody in his flicks autistically talks about some surface level tv shows and cartoons.
also IMAGINE making a ww2 film but than have it revolve around MORE characters talking about - MOVIES. yes queertin, you possess a surface level knowledge on german cinema from the 20s and 30s. much wow!
p.s. i hope queertin homosexualino falls into a bottomless pit
Pulp Fiction 9/10 (S)
Reservoir Dogs 8.5/10 (A)
Kill Bill 8/10 (A)
The Hateful Eight 7.5/10 (B)
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood 7/10 (B)
Death Proof 7/10 (B)
Django Unchained 6.5/10 (C)
Jackie Brown 6/10 (C)
Inglorious Basterds 5.5/10 (D)
Kill bill is just embarrassing. Put that shit dead last, swap Hollywood and hateful 8 and it’s accurate
I love Quentin Tarantino movies, couldn't care less what people who don't like them think
this stupid contrarian edgy manchild loser has been viral marketing his channel on here for years
report the thread, hide it and move on
saged
Are you mad that he is contrarian like Cinemaphile yet is intelligent and has a nice following? Smells like envy to me lmao
Reservoir Dogs > Once Upon a Time in Hollywood > Jackie Brown > Pulp Fiction > who cares
It's not even the best Elmore Leonard adaptation. It's why Tarrantino decided to stick to directing his own material--how sluggish he made Leonard's plot mechanics and (usually slightly cartoonish) interpersonal dynamics come off. It's not bad but it was outside the wheelhouse and felt overly restrained (which is bad coming from a director whose major schtick is going balls out). You could argue you like it for that reason but saying it's his best film is contrarian nonsense--all the qualities he's known for are muted and there's, at least relatively, no chemistry when everything is taken as a whole. Jackie Brown is still good but it's less than the sum of its parts.
Name a younger director who is better than Tarantino
mike bay
Baysed
homosexualino's best is still much worse than bay's worst. homosexualino makes films for manhattan critics and dnc staffers. bay makes films for boys and men.
People who discover art, including cinema, emulates previous stories and scenes tend to be midwits. They go "AHA this scene Kubrick stole from Phantom Carriage" when it is a clear, deliberate shot by shot allusion to a previous work.
There's a difference between inspiration and ripping something off though. Look at Seth MacFarlane's career for obvious examples.
jackie brown is an objectively boring movie
django is decent but very simple and one-note and has a weirdly paced ending
jackie brown boring
kill bill vol 2 is very mediocre, vol 1 is a near perfect film
Reservoir Dogs is his best and only good film. So Sayeth the Cruise. /thread
agreed. but con air is not a bay film
That’s crazy I always thought Michael Bay directed that. Oh well still kino