Then start eating the bugs and drinking the onions milk while Leo cruises in his private jet to his yacht where he burns more emissions in a single vacation than 10 families will burn in a single year, you kiss ass homosexual
“DUDE WHO DARES ABOUT THIS PROBLEM THAT WILL AFFECT FUTURE GENERATIONS LMAO”
People like you who have this thinking are the reason why we’re stuck with onlyfans, homosexuals, and miscegenation. have a nice day homosexual.
He is actively pushing rules for thee but not for me. Idiots have abused the term but this is what actual oppressor behavior looks like. He is someone in a position of power and wealth utilizing that wealth to work to take away your rights that he himself freely enjoys.
You're right that Leo is a hypocritical woke homosexual promoting the lie that global warming is caused by humans, but you can't deny that his advice of never doing hard drugs and capeshit to that ugly israelite rat (who I will never see the movies of) is based. You can be right about some things and wrong about some things and Leo is an example of that.
Timmy: >Portrays inventors, leaders, great men who help others and change the course of history
Holland: >Portrays a snotty, awkward, marvel-written teenager and a gay dude who gets fricked in the ass by a black guy
As far as the quality goes Chamalet's movies have been absolutely atrocious. He's the easiest A lister to avoid for me now, I know exactly what a film will be like. >Dune
Horrible, one of the most visually repugnant films I've seen. >Wonka
Looks a match to that. I was interested in seeing it until all of the dreadful promo material >Call Me By Your Name
Passable but dull and unevocative, I wouldn't urge anyone not to watch it but certainly won't be recommending. >The French Dispatch
Easily Wes' worst to date, and Chamalet's segment by a margin the most exhausting dull of the lot. >Don't Look Up
Honestly in the bottom 10 movies I've seen, ranging from cringeworthy to thoroughly irritating for the entire duration, and again a visual atrocity at times.
I've considered seeing Little Women and Bones and All but I'm terrified of his stink being in them
I have no idea what yhe point of this post is, or who you are talking about, but I don't think that an actor having a distinctly bad body of work that I'll entirely avoid going forward is a positive accomplishment. That's normally reserved for a director.
Wonka was good. Very heartfelt interpretation of the 1971 film as a prequel. I was surprised because I thought it'd be slop but has a really good cast and just overall made me feel good.
Not sure if it's better than the original but easily better than the weird Depp one.
>Isn't crack same as cocaine?
exactly the same but smoking it gives you a more intense high that doesn't last as long and makes those with addictive personalities more likely to binge it. For that it's considered worse. Can't imagine Leo smoking crack. He seems like the type that might do a bump or two occasionally.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Have any actors ever been exposed as crack heads or meth heads?
4 months ago
Anonymous
That Delevingne chick was seen smoking meth and tweaking out in public a bunch of times. And the fact that she was a super sexual degenerate was also an obvious tell
4 months ago
Anonymous
>born to a wealthy connected family >young and attractive >life is your playground >take drugs
How can people claim life is a gift when even someone who has it that good can't enjoy it without altering their mind?
4 months ago
Anonymous
I'll never understand how someone can find that creature with brezhnev's eyebrows attractive.
4 months ago
Anonymous
When major media outlets say so in unison
4 months ago
Anonymous
Based as frick
4 months ago
Anonymous
how to into meth?
4 months ago
Anonymous
That's a path you really don't want to go down
4 months ago
Anonymous
why?
4 months ago
Anonymous
If you think your life is bad now, you're in for a real surprise if you get addicted to meth
4 months ago
Anonymous
it’s wild that the external damage is nothing compared to the internal damage. those peoples brains are completely fried
4 months ago
Anonymous
>it’s wild that the external damage is nothing compared to the internal damage. those peoples brains are completely fried
Isn't most of the damage just down to lack of sleep though.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Lack of sleep leads to the decline in physical looks and a lot of other important bodily functions that sleep is necessary for. But they also fry their dopamine receptors over time, making them feel super depressed when they're off the drug. The longer they use, the lower their baseline dopamine and serotonin levels become. So if they started out at a baseline of 100, they might be pushed down to a baseline of 50 after a couple of years of hard use and never get back up. So they can never again feel true happiness like they used to and they're forced to use SSRIs just to not be suicidally depressed 24/7
4 months ago
Anonymous
Damn, Leo's right I'll never go near that shit
4 months ago
Anonymous
sometimes the meth makeover just works
4 months ago
Anonymous
>second guy from top left
in one year he looks to have grown back all his hair and then some, does meth cure male pattern baldness???
4 months ago
Anonymous
This guy went hard on the pipe
4 months ago
Anonymous
Apparently that CSI guy also turned into a meth head
Both come from the same substance, but it's very different both in effect and addiction potential. The crack high is much, much more intense, but even shorter than coke, so users keep re-dosing over and over again to achieve the effects.
Most people count meth, heroin and crack as hard drugs. Coke, alcohol, benzos are medium. And the rest are basically different degrees of soft drugs
Opioids are way fricking worse you moron. People sometimes downplay how bad cocaine really is , but still nowhere near as bad as fentanyl or Xanax or other shit.
It's the opposite. Drugs, except the hard ones, should be reserved for people who've already won at life. It's like the final cherry on top of an already great life and that allows them to use the drugs responsibly instead of abusing it to feel happy like depressed wagies do
That's right. Nobody would ever see him as anything other than Spiderman after that so he didnt get any good roles. One big payday instead of dozens of big paydays for 30+ years like Leo. Short sighted
Use your brain anon. That's guaranteed big money for 3 blockbusters (even if SM3 sucked) and then 20 years later a fourth. A lot of actors won't ever even have 1 big role. It was obviously the right decision.
Being real here I don't see Tobey having much of a career at all if he didn't do Spiderman. He never seemed to have great charisma and looks a bit goblin-like, though I find him likable and he was perfectly cast as Peter Parker. It was unquestionably the right move to go for the role for any actor even if they would've had a good career because it's an extremely competitive and volatile industry.
You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with Leo. If you think you know the ins and out of success in hollywood better than he does then alright dude, keep on rocking
4 months ago
Anonymous
Leo would never have told Tobey not to do Spiderman. He gave that advice to Timothee Chalagay who has a very different career path + makes millions from other work he does so he can be picky.
4 months ago
Anonymous
he netted 4 million dollars for the first spidey and tons more for the next two, you're genuinely moronic if you think it was a bad move to star in those
His record is public. The guys publishing his works distanced themselves from him because the guy running his website had made private statements to others that he (the website guy) enjoyed watching child porn. James stood by him which even the Atomwaffen guys became annoyed at. Recently in the last couple months James has distanced himself from that website guy and thus the guys selling his books have restarted their relationship with him.
This is all public knowledge. If you're going to make up a lie try and make it more believable. James Mason actually had sex with one of his friends wives, who was 50+ years old, he cheated with her, that's the most dirt on the man in his entire life kek. Atomwaffen bros got annoyed about that. They don't like adultery.
People who say DUNC have some sort of brain chemistry dysfunction, I don't know what, could be fluoride, 5G towers, xenoestrogens, or sissy hypnosis, but something is not right with them.
I've done basically every drug, just nothing IV (done IM though) and coke is easily one of the hardest. It's the only thing i ever felt a craving for for months after, even meth, oxies or H didn't cause that.
like 99% of drug users would disagree with you. meth, heroin and crack are in a league of their own. inb4 coke and crack are the same thing. don't even try to go there
I'd very much like to see the source for that as it strikes me as bullshit. Coke is far more dopaminergic that opiates. Given the phenomenological correlate of dopamine isn't euphoria it's reward and drive to repeat. You get trapped in a very repetitive cycle of wanting more and feeling like you should have more. Coke is without rival in that regard from my experience.
Sure when you're on meth you keep redosing but when you stop i never found any call to get back to it. Whereas with coke i kept having thoughts of how fun and good it would be to do it again for a good few months after.
>I'd very much like to see the source for that as it strikes me as bullshit
Google dopamine levels per drug and you'll find an abundance of sources yourself. There's no shortage of research on this and it's not controversial at all
4 months ago
Anonymous
I'm looking through scholar right now and can't find any study with any actual data on dopamine activity post drugs. If you have anything other than an unsourced infograph post it. I'll keep looking myself but otherwise there's no evidence.
4 months ago
Anonymous
I'm looking through scholar right now and can't find any study with any actual data on dopamine activity post drugs. If you have anything other than an unsourced infograph post it. I'll keep looking myself but otherwise there's no evidence.
Ok first one i've found and it shows opiates don't have a substantial dopamingergic effect compared to stimulants.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn3939
4 months ago
Anonymous
Cherrypicking a self-admitted OPINION ARTICLE locked behind a paywall is pretty funny
>The percentage of laboratory animals that show addictive-like behaviors, or of people that become addicted to a drug after repeated exposure, varies as a function of the drug, being higher for drugs like heroin or methamphetamine and lower for drugs like alcohol or cannabis. For example, only between 15 and 20% of rats chronically exposed to cocaine will continue to compulsively prefer cocaine over other rewarding options (52), whereas the percentage of heroin-preferring rats can go as high as 50% under similar experimental conditions
It's not locked behind a paywall you moron, just use pubsci if you don't have any academic access. Also the study quite literally has quantitative biochemical measurements.
Why are you so blatantly disingenuous lmao
4 months ago
Anonymous
Everybody knows that heroin and to a lesser degree alcohol being physically addictive and cocaine being psychologically addictive. Also the rat thing is also for rats that live together with other rats in a nice environment. When they live isolated in a small cage, they get addicted easier, which proves the point... Most people becoming addicts use it as self medication for traumatic experiences, even if they're not fully aware of it.
My respect for Leonardo DiCaprio has just gone up a lot.
Then start eating the bugs and drinking the onions milk while Leo cruises in his private jet to his yacht where he burns more emissions in a single vacation than 10 families will burn in a single year, you kiss ass homosexual
Oh my science no not the emissions save me bill nye!
No, I think I'll follow his actual advice and grift liberals into having a lower quality of life while using power to enrich myself.
He’s a hypocrite yes but who gives a shit abour emissions lmao
You will care when its the metrics for a social credit system tied to your mandatory digital identity.
“DUDE WHO DARES ABOUT THIS PROBLEM THAT WILL AFFECT FUTURE GENERATIONS LMAO”
People like you who have this thinking are the reason why we’re stuck with onlyfans, homosexuals, and miscegenation. have a nice day homosexual.
He is actively pushing rules for thee but not for me. Idiots have abused the term but this is what actual oppressor behavior looks like. He is someone in a position of power and wealth utilizing that wealth to work to take away your rights that he himself freely enjoys.
Jesus Barbara, dilate
What the frick is onions milk?
You're right that Leo is a hypocritical woke homosexual promoting the lie that global warming is caused by humans, but you can't deny that his advice of never doing hard drugs and capeshit to that ugly israelite rat (who I will never see the movies of) is based. You can be right about some things and wrong about some things and Leo is an example of that.
Wait until his Warner overlords turns him into the homosexual Knight or some shit like that.
dont you ever get tired of repeating the same shit over and over for over a decade?
Someone has been repeating "Wait until his Warner overlords turns him into the homosexual Knight or some shit like that" for over a decade?
No. Why would I?
You’re a big guy
sneed and feed
Leo used to be a coke fiend
Coke's a powder, it's soft
Timmy is honestly based. Doesnt do capeshit and gave a bunch of NYU girls chlamydia.
There’s a reason he’s running circles around Tom Holland, who can only make shitty biopics and then cry and quit acting for a year.
Timmy:
>Portrays inventors, leaders, great men who help others and change the course of history
Holland:
>Portrays a snotty, awkward, marvel-written teenager and a gay dude who gets fricked in the ass by a black guy
Dunc a kino?
Don’t mind if I do!
WHATS MY NAME
DUNKACCINO
ITS A WHOLE NEW GAME
DUNKACCINO
Wonka was shit. Shame on the men in charge who allowed this to be made
He earned $9M upfront for Wonka so yes it's good.
>DUNC and WONKA good
Better than any recent capeshit at least.
Recent because Wonka is probably worse than Spider-Man 2 (2004)
As far as the quality goes Chamalet's movies have been absolutely atrocious. He's the easiest A lister to avoid for me now, I know exactly what a film will be like.
>Dune
Horrible, one of the most visually repugnant films I've seen.
>Wonka
Looks a match to that. I was interested in seeing it until all of the dreadful promo material
>Call Me By Your Name
Passable but dull and unevocative, I wouldn't urge anyone not to watch it but certainly won't be recommending.
>The French Dispatch
Easily Wes' worst to date, and Chamalet's segment by a margin the most exhausting dull of the lot.
>Don't Look Up
Honestly in the bottom 10 movies I've seen, ranging from cringeworthy to thoroughly irritating for the entire duration, and again a visual atrocity at times.
I've considered seeing Little Women and Bones and All but I'm terrified of his stink being in them
hes not good in little women either but its still a good adaptation
It's fine if you don't like them but at least you can list down and criticize at least 7 of his works. Can you do the same for his peers?
I have no idea what yhe point of this post is, or who you are talking about, but I don't think that an actor having a distinctly bad body of work that I'll entirely avoid going forward is a positive accomplishment. That's normally reserved for a director.
Wonka was good. Very heartfelt interpretation of the 1971 film as a prequel. I was surprised because I thought it'd be slop but has a really good cast and just overall made me feel good.
Not sure if it's better than the original but easily better than the weird Depp one.
out of all the aspects of DUNC to take issue with, you settled on the fricking visuals? What's the weather like up at Bell Curve Peak?
>What's the weather like up at Bell Curve Peak?
... What?
Exactly.
kek
>visual atrocity at times.
good way to describe chalamet.
>No hard drugs
Someone post that webm of Leo coked out of his mind at a recent event.
These days they just mean crack, meth, heroin
Cocaine? Pretty sure Leo does that. But yeah opiods are nasty shit.
>Cocaine?
He probably doesn't consider coke or weed hard drugs.
Isn't crack same as cocaine?
>Isn't crack same as cocaine?
exactly the same but smoking it gives you a more intense high that doesn't last as long and makes those with addictive personalities more likely to binge it. For that it's considered worse. Can't imagine Leo smoking crack. He seems like the type that might do a bump or two occasionally.
Have any actors ever been exposed as crack heads or meth heads?
That Delevingne chick was seen smoking meth and tweaking out in public a bunch of times. And the fact that she was a super sexual degenerate was also an obvious tell
>born to a wealthy connected family
>young and attractive
>life is your playground
>take drugs
How can people claim life is a gift when even someone who has it that good can't enjoy it without altering their mind?
I'll never understand how someone can find that creature with brezhnev's eyebrows attractive.
When major media outlets say so in unison
Based as frick
how to into meth?
That's a path you really don't want to go down
why?
If you think your life is bad now, you're in for a real surprise if you get addicted to meth
it’s wild that the external damage is nothing compared to the internal damage. those peoples brains are completely fried
>it’s wild that the external damage is nothing compared to the internal damage. those peoples brains are completely fried
Isn't most of the damage just down to lack of sleep though.
Lack of sleep leads to the decline in physical looks and a lot of other important bodily functions that sleep is necessary for. But they also fry their dopamine receptors over time, making them feel super depressed when they're off the drug. The longer they use, the lower their baseline dopamine and serotonin levels become. So if they started out at a baseline of 100, they might be pushed down to a baseline of 50 after a couple of years of hard use and never get back up. So they can never again feel true happiness like they used to and they're forced to use SSRIs just to not be suicidally depressed 24/7
Damn, Leo's right I'll never go near that shit
sometimes the meth makeover just works
>second guy from top left
in one year he looks to have grown back all his hair and then some, does meth cure male pattern baldness???
This guy went hard on the pipe
Apparently that CSI guy also turned into a meth head
i don't think that's him
homie looks like the zombie from Land of the Dead
Both come from the same substance, but it's very different both in effect and addiction potential. The crack high is much, much more intense, but even shorter than coke, so users keep re-dosing over and over again to achieve the effects.
Most people count meth, heroin and crack as hard drugs. Coke, alcohol, benzos are medium. And the rest are basically different degrees of soft drugs
Coke is to crack what adderall is to meth
stims are nastier than opioids
Opioids are way fricking worse you moron. People sometimes downplay how bad cocaine really is , but still nowhere near as bad as fentanyl or Xanax or other shit.
xanax isnt an opioid
you dont know what you are talking about
Leo doing hard drugs makes him even more qualified to warn other people away. If an alcoholic tells you not to drink, it's for a good reason.
He will be in QT's The Movie Critic
No he's not. He has Dylan biopic then Safdie's ping pong movie
Imagine taking drugs when you won the lottery in life and got the job most people dream of. Drugs should be reserved for wagies and NEETs.
It's the opposite. Drugs, except the hard ones, should be reserved for people who've already won at life. It's like the final cherry on top of an already great life and that allows them to use the drugs responsibly instead of abusing it to feel happy like depressed wagies do
You get rich and realize there's still nothing as good as a great high.
using drugs before you achieved success is a great way to self-sabotage
being an actor is a shit gig. dicaprio still has to suck wiener (at least figuratively) every single day or he wont get work.
id rather do drugs.
i never touched weed until i was rich. if i started when i was poor then i would never have become rich in the first place
weed is such a shitty drug why are you doing that instead of the fun ones if you are rich
>no superhero movies
isn't he supposed to be like best friends with Tobey Maguire?
And Spiderman killed Toby’s career so how is it not good advice?
>career killed by taking one of the biggest roles ever that had him also star in the biggest film of the year 20 years later
That's right. Nobody would ever see him as anything other than Spiderman after that so he didnt get any good roles. One big payday instead of dozens of big paydays for 30+ years like Leo. Short sighted
Use your brain anon. That's guaranteed big money for 3 blockbusters (even if SM3 sucked) and then 20 years later a fourth. A lot of actors won't ever even have 1 big role. It was obviously the right decision.
Being real here I don't see Tobey having much of a career at all if he didn't do Spiderman. He never seemed to have great charisma and looks a bit goblin-like, though I find him likable and he was perfectly cast as Peter Parker. It was unquestionably the right move to go for the role for any actor even if they would've had a good career because it's an extremely competitive and volatile industry.
You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with Leo. If you think you know the ins and out of success in hollywood better than he does then alright dude, keep on rocking
Leo would never have told Tobey not to do Spiderman. He gave that advice to Timothee Chalagay who has a very different career path + makes millions from other work he does so he can be picky.
he netted 4 million dollars for the first spidey and tons more for the next two, you're genuinely moronic if you think it was a bad move to star in those
>no hard drugs and no capeshit is considered "advice"
nobody ever said actors were smart
He has never been convicted of child sex crimes.
>that sexy sexy kid was a lying b***h! I dindunuffin!
His record is public. The guys publishing his works distanced themselves from him because the guy running his website had made private statements to others that he (the website guy) enjoyed watching child porn. James stood by him which even the Atomwaffen guys became annoyed at. Recently in the last couple months James has distanced himself from that website guy and thus the guys selling his books have restarted their relationship with him.
This is all public knowledge. If you're going to make up a lie try and make it more believable. James Mason actually had sex with one of his friends wives, who was 50+ years old, he cheated with her, that's the most dirt on the man in his entire life kek. Atomwaffen bros got annoyed about that. They don't like adultery.
>trusting what the ~~*media*~~ says about any antisemite
bruh are you fricking moronic
He is a socialist so he is europedo by default.
James Mason doesn't understand socialism. He's a revolutionary and anti democracy. There is a major difference.
People who say DUNC have some sort of brain chemistry dysfunction, I don't know what, could be fluoride, 5G towers, xenoestrogens, or sissy hypnosis, but something is not right with them.
Obviously Leo's advice worked
these celine are made in bangladeshi garments lmao. the units with some barely noticeable faults can be bought from new market for 3-5 dollars.
>2500 dollarydoos on a basic hoody and trousers
drips transcend aesthetic
He has such shite taste lmao. It's all 80iq tard buys the first thing with a high price tag tier.
Imaging owning beats headphones.
You think he paid for any of that shite?
all meme brands
>Actually buying Beats
Beats are shit-tier headphones for Black folk and consoomers. Sonys are the true patrician-tier sets.
Fauci and Nike linked up?
surprisingly cheap shoes
But Leo's a pretty known coke hound
good thing he said hard drugs and not all drugs then
I've done basically every drug, just nothing IV (done IM though) and coke is easily one of the hardest. It's the only thing i ever felt a craving for for months after, even meth, oxies or H didn't cause that.
*have done IV morphine actually
like 99% of drug users would disagree with you. meth, heroin and crack are in a league of their own. inb4 coke and crack are the same thing. don't even try to go there
I'd very much like to see the source for that as it strikes me as bullshit. Coke is far more dopaminergic that opiates. Given the phenomenological correlate of dopamine isn't euphoria it's reward and drive to repeat. You get trapped in a very repetitive cycle of wanting more and feeling like you should have more. Coke is without rival in that regard from my experience.
Sure when you're on meth you keep redosing but when you stop i never found any call to get back to it. Whereas with coke i kept having thoughts of how fun and good it would be to do it again for a good few months after.
>I'd very much like to see the source for that as it strikes me as bullshit
Google dopamine levels per drug and you'll find an abundance of sources yourself. There's no shortage of research on this and it's not controversial at all
I'm looking through scholar right now and can't find any study with any actual data on dopamine activity post drugs. If you have anything other than an unsourced infograph post it. I'll keep looking myself but otherwise there's no evidence.
Ok first one i've found and it shows opiates don't have a substantial dopamingergic effect compared to stimulants.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn3939
Cherrypicking a self-admitted OPINION ARTICLE locked behind a paywall is pretty funny
>The percentage of laboratory animals that show addictive-like behaviors, or of people that become addicted to a drug after repeated exposure, varies as a function of the drug, being higher for drugs like heroin or methamphetamine and lower for drugs like alcohol or cannabis. For example, only between 15 and 20% of rats chronically exposed to cocaine will continue to compulsively prefer cocaine over other rewarding options (52), whereas the percentage of heroin-preferring rats can go as high as 50% under similar experimental conditions
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6890985/
It's not locked behind a paywall you moron, just use pubsci if you don't have any academic access. Also the study quite literally has quantitative biochemical measurements.
Why are you so blatantly disingenuous lmao
Everybody knows that heroin and to a lesser degree alcohol being physically addictive and cocaine being psychologically addictive. Also the rat thing is also for rats that live together with other rats in a nice environment. When they live isolated in a small cage, they get addicted easier, which proves the point... Most people becoming addicts use it as self medication for traumatic experiences, even if they're not fully aware of it.
>and definetely no old hags. I repeat NO OLD HAGS
based
I wish Leo was my big brother
Real men don't act. They are. Why Connery and Moore are James Bond and this pansy is a fruit smoothie version of someone gene wilder made masculine.
is Dicaprio really drug free?
I hope he passed his knowledge about women too
>Dunc
Kino
>Wonka
Solid family film
>Capeshit
Redditslop
>(You)
moronic Warnershit shill
Reminder that Timothy is a Zionist racist colonizer
Gaza kids can't even live or hold onto their families while he makes millions piling on their deaths
>Not gobbling it up
Tim sucked on DUNC.
Because there's way too much fricking capeshit
So what you're saying is you have not seen any of these movies, correct?