>don't have to transport around a huge arsenal of different weapons, just use the same grip and CGI in a different one at will for whatever scene you need a gun in
Normies don't notice the difference
You're missing the key component that makes it completely valid. >own the CGI company >low overheads compared to prop companies >can make up whatever moronic costs you like >rake in tons of money just making the film >never have to actually hit the claimed budget to break even
There's a reason why they don't give a frick if a film flops any more, and it's because they've made their money during production.
>paying for cgi
Every other year the oscars has a controversy when they announce who won best visual effects and it turns out the company went bankrupt before receiving the award because the studio didn't pay them.
>movie from 2019 is still making anons on Cinemaphile seethe
Kek. But seriously though, stop watching Marvel movies. Normalgays have got the memo that they fricking suck ass and are CGI'd to death now, why can't Cinemaphile get it?
They did, they were just covered in so much CGI that even the miniature work looks like it was made in a computer.
they really did though
[...]
They REALLY did though
Like did anyone here think for even a second that the Geonosis collosseum or the lava field were practical miniatures while watching the films? I sure didn't, it all looked like cgslop
>Nooo, you don't need to just drive to some cliffs and set up cameras, instead pay my vfx company to CGI it for you. >That'll be $500,000 + tip(per 25 frames of footage)
I don't really get MCU's plans: >shoot scenes now >render CGIs now >test audience hate it >reshoot the whole damn thing >spend millions of dollars >repeat until release date
Because executives love to meddle and it's easier to say, "No, I want to gun to look like this instead of that," is easier when you can do it in a computer instead of call an actor back for reshoots. That's the real reason cgi is used so much.
Have you seen what happens when a real gun gets on set?
So they can get rid of it in post if market research determines having a gun on screen would make more money or not.
And if in the future they decide to reuse a scene, they can frick with it more easil
Lmao, Marvel is so fricking soulless. The ultimate corporate slop for the ultimate slavepigs.
Hang every person who has ever had a hand in producing capeshit.
Bro you just genocided half of India.
India has worked perfectly well for thousands of years because of the caste system. Guess who implemented it — the Aryans.
Why does everyone in the world hate panjeets? Like wherever you go in whatever time period Indians are always subhumans
Walking breathing turds
They're the most annoying people you can come across on the planet.
SIR
Why didn't the soiboi fatty Asian dude do anything?
Not his problem. Women can take care of themselves, it's 2024.
I figured he was with her since I'm assuming this is India
It's Hong Kong. Pajeets are everywhere now.
how horny do you have to be to just straight up walk up to a girl in public and force her against the wall and start feeling her up?
how moronic do you have to be to continue filming your assault and enabling him instead of doing something about it?
>guy who never left his house and died a virgin has strong opinions on foreign countries
many such cases
>you kneed to be a chef to know when the food tastes like shit.
More like you need to taste food to know a food tastes like shit, moron
literally me
ask Alec Baldwin
>don't have to transport around a huge arsenal of different weapons, just use the same grip and CGI in a different one at will for whatever scene you need a gun in
Normies don't notice the difference
>pay millions for cgi
>instead of thousands for a prop
>imagine the SAVINGS
It’s so idiotic I bet it was said.
You're missing the key component that makes it completely valid.
>own the CGI company
>low overheads compared to prop companies
>can make up whatever moronic costs you like
>rake in tons of money just making the film
>never have to actually hit the claimed budget to break even
There's a reason why they don't give a frick if a film flops any more, and it's because they've made their money during production.
>paying for cgi
Every other year the oscars has a controversy when they announce who won best visual effects and it turns out the company went bankrupt before receiving the award because the studio didn't pay them.
That's your complaint? Why did they CGI in the background? Surely it would have been cheaper just to drive down to IKEA and buy all that shit
It was actually good CG, because no one noticed until they saw this image.
its also a toy gun in cgi so hard to say why anything is there.
No, they just make the whole movie looked washed out and ugly so people can’t notice the CGI from the non-CGI. I liked it more in LotR.
>movie from 2019 is still making anons on Cinemaphile seethe
Kek. But seriously though, stop watching Marvel movies. Normalgays have got the memo that they fricking suck ass and are CGI'd to death now, why can't Cinemaphile get it?
Remember
the prequels used plenty of real sets and miniatures you're a moron
The really didnt though
they really did though
They REALLY did though
They did, they were just covered in so much CGI that even the miniature work looks like it was made in a computer.
Like did anyone here think for even a second that the Geonosis collosseum or the lava field were practical miniatures while watching the films? I sure didn't, it all looked like cgslop
>cgi brown wall
they couldn't trust a black man with a real gun.
It greatly eases up production logistics and they can afford it.
To give the CGI people work to do.
Sam Jackson wasn't available to be on location for filming, so they had to green screen virtually that entire scene.
Look it up.
Because somehow real guns keep showing up on set and actors keep shooting each other for real.
money laundering
don't need to have firearms union wagey on set for 8 hours a day at $100 an hour
Nothing about these movies is real, which is why they look so shit and uncanny.
That's fricking ridiculous.
>Nooo, you don't need to just drive to some cliffs and set up cameras, instead pay my vfx company to CGI it for you.
>That'll be $500,000 + tip(per 25 frames of footage)
i'm starting to understand why these movies cost 300 million to make
why even bother with live action
Frick Hollywood.
CGI is not a bad thing.
There's just CGI that's used in a bad way.
So it doesn't Rust
Baldwined
I don't really get MCU's plans:
>shoot scenes now
>render CGIs now
>test audience hate it
>reshoot the whole damn thing
>spend millions of dollars
>repeat until release date
Because executives love to meddle and it's easier to say, "No, I want to gun to look like this instead of that," is easier when you can do it in a computer instead of call an actor back for reshoots. That's the real reason cgi is used so much.
they hadn't settled on what gun or where that scene would take place.