>character is nothing but a reskin of an existing popular character
>made and exists only to celebrate a presidential win and push a political agenda
Is this good writing?
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
kys
Nah
Please?
I kissed your sister too.
How is it wrong though
I don't watch tranime shit unless it's something that I find it extremely niche to my preference.
Can someone what is op implying?
>I don't watch tranime
Tranime what?
Do you know what the homosexual OP is blabbering about or are you gonna play it dense and focus on my life like beta orbiters?
Which part is stumping you
But you are okay with watching cartroons?
>trannies out of nowhere
>frogposting
Amerimutt moment
OP is implying that Miles Morales is an inherently politically charged character because he and Obama are both black, somehow equivalent to an outright parody comic that cast Donald Trump as the most powerful superhero in the world that riffed on My Hero Academa's character designs.
>he doesn't know
Much like your brain, your pants, and your life there is nothing of any value in your post.
>he lacks the knowledge
Ignore the resident troony incels.
>he is information deficient
I see, I wouldn't disagree with him considering what even the wiki says about miles conception as a character but I'd probably pick one of these two instead. too much on the nose
Marvel literally made Miles to commemorate Obama winning, Bendis also said he felt he was fixing a mistake by making Miles i.e. Spider-Man being white
> Marvel literally made Miles to commemorate Obama winning
Why did they wait 3 years to do it, then? This narrative is absurd.
So they toyed with the idea of making a black legacy character to coincide with Obama, and then chose not to do it because they didn't have a clear enough idea of what they wanted. Then, three years later, parts of that idea resurface in an unrelated event.
Wow, such conspiracy. Very political.
I am sorry you got blown the frick out with hard facts anon, better luck next time
but they didn't
did you not understand what you posted or just not read to the end? they shitcanned it for three years and did something else instead because they hadn't conceptualised what they wanted the character to be
you're trying to own this other anon based on the fact that marvel made a black character three years after it occurred to them that there was going to be a black president for the first time, you dum dum
correlation=/=causation
I think I'm going to go with the quotes from Marvel editorial rather than your headcanon
NTA, but he's right. The quotes don't mean what you seem to think they mean.
To put it another way: how long do you think Obama getting elected remains the primer mover on this idea? 3 years is a long time, Obama's first term was almost over by then. Do you really think that just because the idea was first floated around the election, it remains election motivated no matter how much times passes or how much the details of the character are reworked and changed in the meantime?
If 10 years had passed before they finally released the first issue with Miles Morales in it, would it still in your mind been 'to commemorate the election of the first black president'?
>Marvel editorial decides to kill off Ultimate Peter to replace him with a black Spider-Man to celebrate the first black American president
>that same Marvel editorial consisting of the same people executes that plan shortly after
>it's not politically motivated now somehow because uhhh... the comic didn't come out the same day Obama was inaugurated
Anon please
>shortly after
>years later
So you agree that you would make the same argument no matter how long the length of time between the two events was, which is absurd.
Anon please learn to read, the same people executed the same plan within the same term, if anything their motivations got more political with time knowing all the other legacy characters they tried to push
Everyone who's read Ultimate knows that Peter died twice, it's just that the first time it was decided he ackshually survived. I can buy that they were testing the waters to replace him as far back as then.
That's pretty much what they said
Redditor
Any depiction of Trump as a powerfully built square jawed thick haired ubermensch is desperate cope from guys who can't face the fact the leader of their movement is a fat homosexual who wears more makeup than drag queens who just has the same opinions as their dad
>but is woke
>nothing is ever woke
Is it bad writing, though?