Again, he found them at pizza planet. Who gives a frick that there was a name on the foot? If you found five dollars in the ground and it said Andy your ass would be searching down the owner?
literally not even the same thing. literally 2 out of place toys in a space themed pizza arcade, with hand written names on them would make me question shit.
>literally 2 out of place toys in a space themed pizza arcade
A kid would not understand this. Buzz Lightyear fit right into the theme of the restaurant. >with hand written names on them
On their foot. Bold of you to assume kids care enough to inspect their toys at that level of detail, especially one as destructive as Sid.
He didn't seem personally acquainted with Andy, who was several grades below him, and even if he knew there was a neighbor kid named Andy why would he have any reason to think they were THAT Andy's toys. He didn't know they were lost, no one was putting up fliers.
Dude just take the win with Sid stealing his sister's Toys. Buzz and Woody don't factor into the equation and Don't even need to for you to be right about Sid stealing toys.
Hey, guess what. That's completely normal for a kid. I did the same thing to my older sister's barbie dolls. She broke a few of my toys as well. It's called being a child you moron.
No, this shit isn't normal. Unless you're a weird brainfricked kid you don't destroy every little thing you can. In fact, you actually take pride in your shit and hope it doesn't break because you like having toys.
Sid was one stop from ripping the wings off of animals and saying "but they're just bugs," well on his way to torturing someone or something else.
Nah most kids do destroy their toys and sometimes other kids toys. The non normal autistic ones like yourself are the ones that spaz out and try to attack actual human beings because their favorite inanimate object got broken.
yea but how many allow a minor to buy them? He definitely lied to get it
Or a parent or family friend bought them for him... Like how the mass majority of kids get fire crackers and such.
Sid was playing with M80s. The fricking poster child "This is not a toy" firecracker that are loaded with 80-300 grams of powder. Those have been illegal for children to posess, nation-wide, since the 60s. Regardless of how permissive the state laws are or how attentive or drunk their parents are.
I'm surprised Greg was so friendly towards Pearl considering all the shit she pulled. I wonder if there's an alternate version of the cartoon where Greg and Pearl are both antagonistic towards each other instead of it being one sided. Would've been funner.
I mean he cucked her physically and even worse emotionally. And then Pearl later on learns Rose wasn’t always honest with her about everything like she thought. Sounds like Pearl got exactly what she deserved for being such a simp. It’s a great example as to why you should just shoot your shot immediately vs longing from afar because you’ll always end the lose like she was
His behavior was less "I'm making art" and more "I want to tear shit apart and frick around with it." If it was really realistic he probably would have been killing animals or something too.
Sid was just playing with toys like any other kid. He just did it in a different way. We all knew that one kid who smashed or broke their toys, usually on purpose. The fireworks was a little extreme, but his parents were complete deadbeats so it's not surprising he managed to get away with half the shit he did. He also has no reason to believe the toys were sentient.
Woody in Toy Story Trilogy: >does everything he can to make his owner happy, never giving up on them and never abandoning them
Woody in Toy Story 4: >Nah frick bonnie imma get that abusive porcelain pussy
Toy Story 4 ruined everyone's characters, but Woody got it the absolute worst. I don't even feel like going into detail because of how it still frustrates me to think about.
Bonnie wasn't interested in playing with him like Andy was. The whole point was how things change and won't stay the same, and how people change too, same with Bo Peep.
Except that Bonnie WAS playing with Woody. We see this throughout the movie, including during the musical montage of Woody trying to stop Forky from throwing himself away.
It's like the writers don't even read their own scripts.
Not to mention he and everyone else went through the same "he doesn't play with us anymore" phase during Toy Story 3 and Woody STILL wanted to get back to Andy. His sudden attitude change in Toy Story 4 was OOC as frick.
Toy Story is just Pound Puppies with toys. The whole thing is toys will find the place they belong and be loved eventually and they already explored the "things change" theme in 3.
4 instead throws the magic out for a in your face youtube teir realistic look that a 4 year old doesn't have the mental understanding of love and only sees toys as objects and pointing out that humans just see toys as bullshit.
It's like when c**ts say shit like "Thanksgiving is stupid cuz you should be thankful all year!" Like b***h way to miss the fricking point.
Cyn objectively did nothing wrong, because it was the Absolute Solver that was using her body as a puppet. Cyn was just a victim that had her entire identity consumed by an eldritch abomination, what we see isn't even really Cyn.
Murder Drones is trash so they're automatically wrong
Murder Drones is excellent and you have shit taste.
The "Sid was actually just being creative" revisionism is the dumbest millennial brained shit ever. No he wasn't some sweet kid he was a dick of a brother who broke his sister's shit for fun and played out scenarios in his head where he was torturing and killing toys.
He somehow managed to make a claw machine maintain a death grip on prizes that were actively fighting back. That's proof he's in league with the devil right there.
No they are not. YOU were cruel, don't act like just because you were a brat that everyone else also was one.
I lived together with 2 brothers close in age, and you know what? None of us three ever broke anything from the other person.
Did they ever give any sort of explanation as to why it was so important to shove lake back into a mirror?
Tulip seemed fine not having a reflection and they knew that, so what's the problem?
Why would you break your own toys? I've only damaged my toys from playing too much with them (the articulation from certain limbs would go soft and snap), and it'd always make me sad that I'd have to glue them and they'd lose that set of motions.
>Stole his sister's toys, and was aware that this was the wrong thing to do because he immediately tried lying when she ran off to tell their mother >Takes joy out of destroying his sister's belongings, has clearly got an unhealthy habit of this with how many of her toys were shown to be damaged >This also implies that their mother at least does try to punish him when he does wrong, so it can't entirely be blamed on the parents >Mistreats and damages property that doesn't belong to him, such as the games at Pizza Planet >Purchases explosives he isn't allowed to use and sets them off in the neighbourhood, endangering not only his life but others around him.
Sid is definitely a bad kid, and he knows he's a bad kid. Trying to spin it like he was just some misunderstood kid being creative in his own way misses the point of Sid and requires you to overlook a lot of obvious parts of his character. And even with him clearly being a problem child, he gets off pretty easily especially compared to other characters like the Chicken Man. He gets scared off by the toys, something he'll probably chalk up to his imagination running wild when he grows up and then gets a comfortable well paying job in the sanitation industry as seen in Toy Story 3. If anything, them giving him that scare could have been the thing that got him to start behaving more, so that he actually has a steady job instead of becoming a drug addict or alcoholic. Or worse, some kind of deranged violent criminal.
>18 year old Sid >Good job, happy, jamming to music, probably has a girlfriend and his own apartment >18 year old Andy >Going to waste four years on a liberal arts degree, obsessed with childhood toys, virgin, weepy loser
>stoll toys >took them apart >made unholy abominations with them purely to terrorize his sitter and other kids with. >blew them up with fire cracks or nailed them to use as target practice. >Literally just got off to destroying the living shit out of everything.
Star Butterfly
Sasha Waybright
Not her fault the goof she was in love with was blind to the Horde's terribleness.
he was stealing toys from his sister and neighbor
who gives a shit homosexual
Then don't play victim when a hunk of living plastic decides to beat the shit out of you, pussy
>HE DID NOTHING WRONG
>yes he did
>HE DID WRONG BUT I DON'T CARE
concession accepted
>he KILLED PEOPLE
>no he didn't
>ok fine but he took his sister's doll
>who cares?
>WHAT DO YOU MEAN WHO CARES THAT'S JUST BAD!
who said he killed people?
that's literally what he get accused of in the movie since it works under the assertion that toys are alive
>drrr I lost the argument, must now hard cope
he got them at pizza planet. Also Andy's name is on the feet.
Again, he found them at pizza planet. Who gives a frick that there was a name on the foot? If you found five dollars in the ground and it said Andy your ass would be searching down the owner?
literally not even the same thing. literally 2 out of place toys in a space themed pizza arcade, with hand written names on them would make me question shit.
>literally 2 out of place toys in a space themed pizza arcade
A kid would not understand this. Buzz Lightyear fit right into the theme of the restaurant.
>with hand written names on them
On their foot. Bold of you to assume kids care enough to inspect their toys at that level of detail, especially one as destructive as Sid.
>Also Andy's name is on the feet.
He didn't seem personally acquainted with Andy, who was several grades below him, and even if he knew there was a neighbor kid named Andy why would he have any reason to think they were THAT Andy's toys. He didn't know they were lost, no one was putting up fliers.
Dude just take the win with Sid stealing his sister's Toys. Buzz and Woody don't factor into the equation and Don't even need to for you to be right about Sid stealing toys.
Source?
He didn't steal from Andy he didn't even know Buzz and Woody belonged to him he literally just found them outside.
Yes, if he only ruined his own toys he'd be fine but he ruined all of his sisters dolls, which is why she had to play with headless ones
Hey, guess what. That's completely normal for a kid. I did the same thing to my older sister's barbie dolls. She broke a few of my toys as well. It's called being a child you moron.
Sorry your parents didn't give a frick about you or whatever but that's actually not normal
Try harder tard.
I never broke a sibling's toy on purpsoe
You also can't make actual good bait either.
>I did the same thing to my older sister's barbie dolls.
I did this once and my mother wanted to fricking institutionalize me, like I was going to start butchering women.
If anyone needs to be institutionalized, it's your mom.
To be fair to her later in life I institutionalized myself.
I used to play ww2 with my barbies by painting them red like blood and cutting their hair, my parents never gave a shit tho
No, this shit isn't normal. Unless you're a weird brainfricked kid you don't destroy every little thing you can. In fact, you actually take pride in your shit and hope it doesn't break because you like having toys.
Sid was one stop from ripping the wings off of animals and saying "but they're just bugs," well on his way to torturing someone or something else.
Nah most kids do destroy their toys and sometimes other kids toys. The non normal autistic ones like yourself are the ones that spaz out and try to attack actual human beings because their favorite inanimate object got broken.
I stole my sister's dolls and played her girly games. I didn't break them though.
>he jaywalked
>SUBJECT HIM TO UNSPEAKABLE HORROR
You fricking bet. In Singapore you get lashings for littering. The number of joggers would sharply decrease if we started that.
I'm sure that does wonders for some yellow tourist trap society, and not one that actually produces something of worth for the world.
>joggers
>worth
moron altert
Yes, yes. Now please sign the contract to build another base on your land.
>In Singapore you get lashings for littering
Good.
Oogie Boogie from Nightmare before Christmas.
he illegally purchased an explosive
a fire cracker.
and a firework rocker, you ever looked up firework injuries?
rocket*
Not the point. Many states allow fireworks. Either find the state he loved in that owing fireworks at the time was illegal or stfu.
yea but how many allow a minor to buy them? He definitely lied to get it
Or a parent or family friend bought them for him... Like how the mass majority of kids get fire crackers and such.
>Many states allow fireworks
>fire cracker
Sid was playing with M80s. The fricking poster child "This is not a toy" firecracker that are loaded with 80-300 grams of powder. Those have been illegal for children to posess, nation-wide, since the 60s. Regardless of how permissive the state laws are or how attentive or drunk their parents are.
Replace "fireworks" with "alcohol" and see how moronic this argument is.
I'm surprised Greg was so friendly towards Pearl considering all the shit she pulled. I wonder if there's an alternate version of the cartoon where Greg and Pearl are both antagonistic towards each other instead of it being one sided. Would've been funner.
He fricked her after Rose died
I mean he cucked her physically and even worse emotionally. And then Pearl later on learns Rose wasn’t always honest with her about everything like she thought. Sounds like Pearl got exactly what she deserved for being such a simp. It’s a great example as to why you should just shoot your shot immediately vs longing from afar because you’ll always end the lose like she was
His behavior was less "I'm making art" and more "I want to tear shit apart and frick around with it." If it was really realistic he probably would have been killing animals or something too.
Sid was just playing with toys like any other kid. He just did it in a different way. We all knew that one kid who smashed or broke their toys, usually on purpose. The fireworks was a little extreme, but his parents were complete deadbeats so it's not surprising he managed to get away with half the shit he did. He also has no reason to believe the toys were sentient.
Sid did nothing wrong and, thanks to Toy Story 4's bullshit writing and messages, Prospector and Lotso retroactively did nothing wrong either.
haven't watched Toy Story 4, what happens there?
Woody in Toy Story Trilogy:
>does everything he can to make his owner happy, never giving up on them and never abandoning them
Woody in Toy Story 4:
>Nah frick bonnie imma get that abusive porcelain pussy
Toy Story 4 ruined everyone's characters, but Woody got it the absolute worst. I don't even feel like going into detail because of how it still frustrates me to think about.
Bonnie wasn't interested in playing with him like Andy was. The whole point was how things change and won't stay the same, and how people change too, same with Bo Peep.
Was he supposed to just rot in the closet unused?
Yes, toys aren't supposed to run away, they're supposed to stay with their owners
Except that Bonnie WAS playing with Woody. We see this throughout the movie, including during the musical montage of Woody trying to stop Forky from throwing himself away.
It's like the writers don't even read their own scripts.
Not to mention he and everyone else went through the same "he doesn't play with us anymore" phase during Toy Story 3 and Woody STILL wanted to get back to Andy. His sudden attitude change in Toy Story 4 was OOC as frick.
No anon you missed the point.
Toy Story is just Pound Puppies with toys. The whole thing is toys will find the place they belong and be loved eventually and they already explored the "things change" theme in 3.
4 instead throws the magic out for a in your face youtube teir realistic look that a 4 year old doesn't have the mental understanding of love and only sees toys as objects and pointing out that humans just see toys as bullshit.
It's like when c**ts say shit like "Thanksgiving is stupid cuz you should be thankful all year!" Like b***h way to miss the fricking point.
even before that movie they didn't do anything wrong either
Cyn
Murder Drones is trash so they're automatically wrong
murder drones is the best web series on the internet
Better than gay Frick Hotel
>B-Buh my dried up crusty turd is better than that sloppy wet diarrhea!
Yeah, and they're both SHIT. What's your point?
Cyn objectively did nothing wrong, because it was the Absolute Solver that was using her body as a puppet. Cyn was just a victim that had her entire identity consumed by an eldritch abomination, what we see isn't even really Cyn.
Murder Drones is excellent and you have shit taste.
The "Sid was actually just being creative" revisionism is the dumbest millennial brained shit ever. No he wasn't some sweet kid he was a dick of a brother who broke his sister's shit for fun and played out scenarios in his head where he was torturing and killing toys.
His sister was moronic
Me.
He somehow managed to make a claw machine maintain a death grip on prizes that were actively fighting back. That's proof he's in league with the devil right there.
He even fixed his sister’s doll out of the goodness of his heart.
Tell that to the neighbors who have to constantly deal with exploded toy bits all over their lawns.
Tell that to the drunken father's 12 gauge
stole his sister's toys
This thread really making a couple of anon's out themselves as shitty brothers
Kids are cruel, anon.
No they are not. YOU were cruel, don't act like just because you were a brat that everyone else also was one.
I lived together with 2 brothers close in age, and you know what? None of us three ever broke anything from the other person.
Did they ever give any sort of explanation as to why it was so important to shove lake back into a mirror?
Tulip seemed fine not having a reflection and they knew that, so what's the problem?
Why would you break your own toys? I've only damaged my toys from playing too much with them (the articulation from certain limbs would go soft and snap), and it'd always make me sad that I'd have to glue them and they'd lose that set of motions.
Will they make a 5 movie or is it just a rumor?
nothing really bad happened to him either the toys just scared him
Unironically, Sid had some very impressive craftsmanship for a kid. My favorite was the little car with doll limbs instead of wheels
For me, it's the GI Joe skateboard pilot, with Stretch Armstrong roller coming in at second.
homosexual
>Stole his sister's toys, and was aware that this was the wrong thing to do because he immediately tried lying when she ran off to tell their mother
>Takes joy out of destroying his sister's belongings, has clearly got an unhealthy habit of this with how many of her toys were shown to be damaged
>This also implies that their mother at least does try to punish him when he does wrong, so it can't entirely be blamed on the parents
>Mistreats and damages property that doesn't belong to him, such as the games at Pizza Planet
>Purchases explosives he isn't allowed to use and sets them off in the neighbourhood, endangering not only his life but others around him.
Sid is definitely a bad kid, and he knows he's a bad kid. Trying to spin it like he was just some misunderstood kid being creative in his own way misses the point of Sid and requires you to overlook a lot of obvious parts of his character. And even with him clearly being a problem child, he gets off pretty easily especially compared to other characters like the Chicken Man. He gets scared off by the toys, something he'll probably chalk up to his imagination running wild when he grows up and then gets a comfortable well paying job in the sanitation industry as seen in Toy Story 3. If anything, them giving him that scare could have been the thing that got him to start behaving more, so that he actually has a steady job instead of becoming a drug addict or alcoholic. Or worse, some kind of deranged violent criminal.
He's ugly as sin
That already makes him wrong for life
I bet he grew up into a school shooter
he grew up to be a garbage man
And thanks Bush, Obama and Biden he now makes more money than Andy with his useless college degree.
Redditor
FRICK YOU SID!!!!
that's what you get for stepping on a barbie doll back in 1994!!! you pig!
>gainfully employed and spends his work days vibing to his favourite tunes
Seems like he's doing alright to me.
true
but he stole his little sister's toys to destroy
the kid is a psycho and needs therapy
next step will be tiny animals
>18 year old Sid
>Good job, happy, jamming to music, probably has a girlfriend and his own apartment
>18 year old Andy
>Going to waste four years on a liberal arts degree, obsessed with childhood toys, virgin, weepy loser
Who won in the end?
>stoll toys
>took them apart
>made unholy abominations with them purely to terrorize his sitter and other kids with.
>blew them up with fire cracks or nailed them to use as target practice.
>Literally just got off to destroying the living shit out of everything.
Clayton just wanted to sell gorillas to zoo's and get his paycheck.