I think the ones who were smart enough to notice that the decoy girl wasn't interested/actually 13 were also smart enough to recognize a sting operation in the chatroom.
You've gotta be pretty dumb/desperate to bother to drive to some "13 year old" who you found in a sex chatroom house and expect everything to go smoothly.
Most of these guys are on the razor's edge between 'dumb guy' and medically recognized morons, some are full tards.
I think the ones who were smart enough to notice that the decoy girl wasn't interested/actually 13 were also smart enough to recognize a sting operation in the chatroom.
You've gotta be pretty dumb/desperate to bother to drive to some "13 year old" who you found in a sex chatroom house and expect everything to go smoothly.
True pedos are almost always moronic or close to it. It's one thing for a grown man to date some airheaded 17 year old, girls are kind of dumb at any age. It's another to be emotionally relating to and having extended conversations with a 12 year old
What you are describing is a mentally stunted person.
An actual true pedophile can be anyone of any mental capacity, they just have an uncontrollable lust for prepubescent children.
There are millions of true pedophiles in existence that have the mental capacity to avoid trying to diddle kids.
Are you aware of the term post nut clarity? These guys are an example of guys who are not thinking clearly because of a lack of pussy. If they just rubbed one out before leaving they probably would have realized it was a bad idea.
Am I fricked up for feeling sorry for these fricking morons? or am I playing into their whole "act" of trying to be innocent and stupid and shit so people will feel sorry for them and they'll be victims when they get caught?
They didnt know that, they believed they were speaking to a minor
9 months ago
Anonymous
>announce to the world you're going to kill batman >drive around the city looking for batman >dont find him, give up and go home
Am I really guilty of anything other than being massively moronic?
9 months ago
Anonymous
You're certainly guilty of that, that's for sure.
Comparing something existent with something nonexistent. Quite moronic indeed.
9 months ago
Anonymous
Where is the totally existing minor he was trying to get with?
9 months ago
Anonymous
>announce to the world I'm going to buy cocaine >meet up with someone who gives me a bag of white powder. >said someone is actually a cop and the white powder is climbing chalk.
Am I really guilty of trying to buy cocaine? I didn't even get any.
9 months ago
Anonymous
No
You by definition did not buy cocain
Literally any lawyer could get you off on that context
If you're guilty of buying drugs from the cop then he's guilty of selling them
Lol
9 months ago
Anonymous
That's not how it works in the real world genius. There are vice squads and drug busts happen. However, I think all these string operations, trying to initiate a crime in order to catch a criminal, is just atrocious and anti-freedom. this is absolutely no way for a government that claims to derive it's power from the consent of the governed to behave. going around trying to turn people into criminals, into jihadists.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>What is attempted murder
9 months ago
Anonymous
isn't attempted murder a lesser crime? Are these guys getting locked away for attempted rape, or is it the same as someone who literally raped a child.
It is funny that even the lonely homosexuals here don’t understand that the allure for 90% of these guys isn’t the fact that the chick is underage. It is the fact that she showed interest in them
You’re not fricked up
They’re sad and they got tricked
nope, the law knows everything you believe and intend when you are chatting online in text only. they got frickin tom cruise waving his hands at the bat-computer saying "jarvis, show me what would have happened if this greasy guy actually went into this building and had sex with an underaged girl", and they go "yeah this is what that guy had in mind" after they wash the cum off their hands and desk
Literally every episode of this show I've seen they're all developmentally disabled and would have literally shown up to the house of any woman who talked to them regardless of her age.
THIS. They're still bad because they would have taken advantage of a younger girl but people need to realize they're opportunist predators rather than child predators as a whole. Still messed up though
It's hard to feel sorry for people who prey on children, though. Most people, even many really fricked up people, will avoid harming children if they can, they have enough of a conscience to draw a line there. When people don't even have that basic instict, they're lost causes.;
Hits the nail on the head pretty well. Lots of sad sacks out there, but they still know better than this. These guys gave up on any kind of morality. At least, any kind that doesn't directly serve them.
You aren't.
The show from the start was criticized because for many cases they were obviously coercing mentally unstable/extremely autistic guys and the bait was talking like an adult on the chat.
This is why in many countries it is explicitly illegal for the bait to ever show any interest or coerce the pedophile into action, or the whole sting is deemed unlawful and person cannot be arrested from it.
>unstable/extremely autistic guys
why is it always autistic guys that are prone to falling to societal ruses. I dont know anybody else falling for that
They are literally being led on by these actors, and yes actual 12 to 15 year olds are little bawds that would actually lead these poor bastards on anyway.
It's all fricking ridiculous.
I've always been on the fence about this show, I do it enjoy though. I've decided that since no minors were involved at any point, they shouldn't be arrested. It makes no sense and reeks of "future crimes". I don't care what the law says, it's stupid. However being publicly exposed on TV should be their only punishment. That seems fair to me.
Yes but the perps had no idea at the time that there were no children involved, they were undertaking this endeavor with the knowledge (to them) that they were going meat and meat underaged individuals.
Yes. They only cry and plead out of self preservation. Their intentions are to get their rocks off with a child and ideally get away without getting caught. They don't give 2 shits about the kid getting hurt, raped, traumatized for life. They just want to use them like a toy and leave. The irony is lost on them when they plead for mercy, the mercy they would never consider for the kid they were about to rape.
Really depends a lot on their age, the age the decoy says they are, how explicit their chat is and what they do for a living. If you're a 26 year old doctor and you're being online moronic with a 17 yr 364 day female then we're the morons for making that illegal and a big deal.
Depends entirely on the circumstance. If the girl was larping as a 16 or 17 year old, you should feel bad for them. 16 is legal a lot of places all around the world, including certain states. Then you cross an arbitrary boundary and NOPE, YOU'RE AN EVIL SADISTIC MONSTER, YOU c**t, SHE WAS ONLY 2 MONTHS OLD (AFTER TURNING 18)
A lot of people on Cinemaphile like to feign outrage over it but these are also the same people who go to /b/ for the underage jailbait threads and e-girl threads, and are the first to sneak into dicky threads.
The true redpill is recognizing that anything 12 and under is truly despicable, but even that is arguable since God impregnated Mary when she was 12, giving birth to Jesus when she was 13.
Most of them are just pathetic lonely men trying to score technically illegal vagine. If the show focused on actual pedophiles you'd want to punch their faces in. But it's pretty rare to see them bait those guys. They recently got that democrat that prosecuted a bunch of /misc/gays for trying to meet up with a woman to frick her infant.
There was also one really dodgy case here where a guy got arrested for CP - he was talking to a decoy who saud they were 18...so legal age. But then the decoy said "what would you do to me if I were your little sister" and he got arrested for "producing" CP by detailing how he'd frick her if she was actually his little sister.
> producing" CP by detailing how he'd frick her if she was actually his little sister.
Gonna need receipts on that. This sounds impossible in America. e-girl/shotacon is a bit of a gray area in some states, but written words are solidly protected under the first amendment. Unless he was actively plotting to molest a child, but the. He wouldn’t be charged with CP, he’d be charged with attempting to have sex with a minor
Not America. Australia. American cops will often b8 British and Australian guys, which in that case fricking a 16 year old is not a crime, so they will encourage them to talk about illegal sexual desires, like beastiality or incest as a means to entrap them.
>Australia
Oh, that makes more sense. Australia has a really weird relationship with ethically dubious crime busts. There was a massive international news story that happened about 10 years ago where Australian police once operated a dark web CP site for a year and were in effect the single largest distributor of CP in the world during that time. Some Scandinavian journalist investigating the forum went to confront what he expected to be the pedo who operated the site, but was surprised to find out it was an Australian police department. Think they might have mentioned it on Mr Robot
They are probably below avg intelligence just getting fished. Chris Hansens is violating tenants of Christianity. He’s a Nazi.
If she had we’d there would be no crime. You can’t possibly tell me there is something wrong with this, you can just look at her.
The show is the problem.
If your only intent is putting people in jail, the show, cops, and justice system is wrong in processing people and baiting them like this. It’s morally wrong. The “Predator” on these things actually don’t want to cause the “victim” any lasting harm.
This show is sexist in how it portrays young women as innocent. They aren’t at all.
I can’t wait until everyone that worked on to catch a predator has their face rotting off in the ground.
Thing is, you cannot bait someone who isn't looking for a victim. Non-pedos will never take the bait because they're not looking for kids to abuse in the first place.
You spelled Muslims, Satanists, and Rabbis wrong.
BTW, each group I listed has at minimum a 2.5x higher rate of sex abuse crimes than Catholic priests and yet which group does the Satanic israelites in Hollywood create the stigma about?
Literally the synagogue of Satan up to their typical tricks. Pathetic.
Yes? Scapegoating a group is alot easier than admitting that the world around us IS the one we chose. But if a shadowy power group directing the show is what you need to not go insane then whatever helps you.
thats the fricked up part, the most they could charge them for is kidnapping, and i dont see any kids in that kitchen. and i'll be damned if i jail soke grown man for napping
This is literally how Black folk and israelites argue lmao. >ya’ll just be tryin to put my boi in jail! It ain’t his fault someone left those tvs in the store winda!
>Hey so listen we're working with this group that falsifies logs and lies to the cops >so like, you're getting off scot free unless you violated probation so remember how the group harrassed you? Well, if they do that again, you know to block them and move onto actual underage kids to rape >help stop the abuse of kids? no no no! We help pedos abuse them!
I know it is an overrated choice but no one fricking beats Anthony Palumbo to me, 99% of the words out of his mouth are classic gold quotes >39, 35, 39 >you can smell my breff >betta put those in tha fridge (X4) >don't get drunk off those >my brotha, my otha brotha >my excuse to come hea? Went to 'Lantic City
[...]
I know it is an overrated choice but no one fricking beats Anthony Palumbo to me, 99% of the words out of his mouth are classic gold quotes >39, 35, 39 >you can smell my breff >betta put those in tha fridge (X4) >don't get drunk off those >my brotha, my otha brotha >my excuse to come hea? Went to 'Lantic City
this dude lives rent free in my head
Hambubger was funny until it turned out just how evil he was - he'd molested and violent assaulted all of his daughters.
For me, it's donni1957_male. The guy's just so pathetic and sad it wraps around to being hilarious again.
Do you think you could actually go there just to hang out with literally no indication of wanting to frick or would they turn you down/force you to say something sexual before inviting you?
Just going to 'hang out' with a minor without their parents would probably be enough to arrest you for showing up
9 months ago
Anonymous
Arrest you for what?
Being friends with a child?
9 months ago
Anonymous
Yes.
9 months ago
Anonymous
That alone would not be sufficient grounds to arrest someone, although it can easily open the door to police involvement. If the child or parent complained, the police would tell the individual to cut it out. If it persisted despite the protests of the family, it wouldn’t be difficult to request some kind of restraining order, and if that was violated then an arrest could be made.
But generally you can’t arrest someone simply for being weird. Here’s an example of how this sort of thing goes down. Mind you, this guy literally ended up dying, but only because he was an idiot who happened to be carrying a stolen gun and he refused to comply. Had he not been carrying an illegal weapon or smoking weed the officer could see, he’d have been let go after being separated from the children. Granted, he was only 19 and we have no idea how old the girls were, but the officer seems to think they were visibly and obviously minors, so I’m guessing we’re talking 12-14 https://youtu.be/xZulxjlntps
9 months ago
Anonymous
> he refused to comply
Bit of an understatement. Dude literally opened fire on a cop
9 months ago
Anonymous
Fascinating video
9 months ago
Anonymous
That escalated quickly
9 months ago
Anonymous
>12 minutes
qrd
9 months ago
Anonymous
>19 year old man asks a gaggle of mall tweens how old they are and creeps them out, they find a cop and tell him what happened >cop approaches man who has an open bottle of vodka under his arm and apparently a glass jar of weed somewhere on his person >cop asks what he thinks he’s doing talking to a bunch of kids like that >he says he only asked their age to make sure they were old enough >cop says they clearly were not. Asks for his name, age yadda yadda >cop gives him a warning for the booze and escorts him out of the mall >at some point he notices the kid has weed on him, asks to search his bag >kid refuses and starts to run, then turns and fires multiple shots at the cop >cop can’t return fire because there are too many people >kid runs to a car as backup arrives, guns blazing >kid shoots himself in the head >apparently had a stolen gun and was afraid of going to jail, so decided to make things 50,000 times worse for no discernible reason
9 months ago
Anonymous
I really want to know how old the girls were. If they were like 12, that would be one thing, but if they were ~16, i really don’t know what the problem is. He was 19, and this happened in Orlando. Florida has a 16-22 age of proximity law. If all he did was ask their age, I really don’t see how this is some major catastrophic thing. The kid’s just a bit of an awkward dumbass
9 months ago
Anonymous
The cop seems to think they were obviously children simply at a glance, so I would assume they were around 13 or something. But the cop handled the whole thing extremely patiently. The dude was drinking in public at 19, and the cop just told him to throw it out and asked him to leave. It’s not like he was being unreasonable, the dude just happened to also be carrying an illegal weapon and freaked out.
9 months ago
Anonymous
>illegal weapon
This is not a thing no matter how badly leftists want it to be
9 months ago
Anonymous
>woops I made a mistake time to reroll my life
I just can't believe how someone life can end like that.
he wans't some homeless junkie either
I guess it never happened so whatever, but I feel like this would be too risky for the decoy
What if they just took out a weapon and started slashing/blasting?
Not even social media apps, fricking read anything about the types of groupies that attended 70’s rock band concerts. All horny jailbaits which didn’t stop any of those guys or even made anyone raise any eyebrows.
David Bowie literally got guardian rights to a 14 year old so he could frick her. The idea teen girls have no clue what they’re doing sometimes is just ignorance or delusional moralgayging
When I was 15 I used to fantasize about blowing my swole tatted up male chemistry teacher, and also fantasize about fricking my female guidance counselor. If either happened I would probably not be so depressed at age 27
Honestly yes, if either my guidance counselor or my chem teacher let me smash It would have had improved my self esteem and also my confidence dating later in life. The sexual experience especially with an experienced adult would have made many later sexual experiences that I actually did have less awkward if a 30 year old woman or man took me aside and gave me the business
If the predators brought the underage boy scissors to cut his wiener off, a pair of panties, and some hormone pills - Chris Hanson would have given them an award and the police would have posed for pictures
>Christian religion has required consent for marriage since its inception >Most European feudal regions did not introduce their daughters to the public for courting until after 15 >Most records from churches in England at the time period reflect average ages of women being ~19 and men around 23
Christians didn't have child brides often sorry to disappoint but most fathers actually were in their children's lives and thus didn't want them getting fricked while they were still children.
Extremely rural region are the only places in most European Christian nations where you could find child marriages and that was more due to lack of choices then men wanting to be married to children.
Rank the responses in terms of which produces the most to least kino TV: >predator thinks Chris is the kid's dad and tries to explain why they're there >predator thinks Chris is a cop and tries to explain himself >predator bolts as soon as Chris appears and doesn't explain anything >predator knows who Chris is and proceeds to sit and try to explain what is going on
Would work if they signed one of those afadavid things with a lawyer first to express their intent
Then he can just troll hansen with it
And if it WASNT a sting, he can just get teen pussy anyways lol
I always enjoyed the ones where they instantly recognize Chris. You can see their pedo hearts fricking sink to the floor instantly. Thinking Chris is the dad is my number 2.
i assume that the only people they film are ones who actually did explicit things on the chat right like sending a nude pic of themselves? is it actually illegal just to converse with underage people in a sexual manner if you don't send explicit photos?
because theoretically a person could do all that then just show up with nothing and truthfully say they only went there to teach the kid not to do that
If you say you're going to lick a little girls pussy, then actually show up and walk in her door its intent. The chat is premeditation of the crime. And who the frick is stupid enough to say lewd shit and then show up to "teach her a lesson"? Nobody is going to believe you
Yes, because we in live in an age where people like to pretend to be holier than thou. Reality is, most men are lying about who they find attractive.
>Y-YOU'RE JUST GIVING EXCUSES YOU SICKO
Sure thing, hypocrite.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24132774/
" Overall, these data suggest that men find pubescent girls identified as being under the age of consent sexually attractive, but inhibit their willingness to report this; the greater the attraction, the greater the inhibition. "
It isn’t a thought crime, it’s a crime-crime. They’re not being charged with wanting to frick a minor, they’re being charged with attempting to frick a minor. If you go stick up a bank but it turns out there’s no money in the vault, you still attempted to rob a bank.
Yes. Whether you will be convicted or not is another matter. This is extremely common with the FBI on drug/terrorism cases. Famously a bunch of /misc/chuds walked free after it was shown the only people in their group that actually discussed their imaginary crime were the undercover feds themselves.
Local cops also do this with fake drug/pandering busts all the time.
>But they aren't attempting to frick a minor, there is no minor, the minor is imaginary.
Doesn’t matter. If you are told that a person is a child, you believe the person is a child, and you attempt to have sex with them, you attempted to have sex with a child. If you were told by police acting undercover that a building was a bank and you go try and rob it, you would probably be charged, yes.
If you go to rob a bank but instead go to a vacant lot and do nothing, because there was never any bank to begin with, it seems like a pretty minor crime. I also don't know why they only use these "intent" laws for pedos and trump voters. You could bust half the population by promising them a lottery rigging system, fake drug sales etc.
>hate husband and want to hire hitman >hitman.com >pay for hitman, give him details of husband, etc >hitman was actually a cop >get arrested for trying to have a hitman kill your husband
MUH THOUGHT CRIME
Yeah this is another one you see quitw often. Seems pretty dubious legally to me. Conspiracy to commit is a grey area. Seems like it only applies when people feel like it.
>be me >referee multiple sports right now soccer, girls lacrosse, and water polo >a lot of the games i do are high school aged >in soccer and lacrosse the girls are in shirts and shorts getting all sweaty >in water polo its ridiculous girls in one piece swimsuits that are constantly riding up their asses >feel like a pedophile creep the entire time >and also in water polo especially, some of the girls and parents or coaches have actually reported referees for behavior they deem "inappropriate" for an adult male to do with a teenage girl even when it's in the scope of his refereeing duties
>some of the girls and parents or coaches have actually reported referees for behavior they deem "inappropriate" for an adult male to do with a teenage girl even when it's in the scope of his refereeing duties
They're pedos that are jealous.
theres a rule in water polo of what to do if a female breast is exposed by a player during a game
a ref got reported because he told some female player to get rid of her wedgie because the rules specifically state that suits have to cover the asscheeks but girls suits always ride up into almost a thong with their asses hanging out
a ref also got reported because he was talking to the players (in the pool) while standing on the deck and moved his sunglasses down his nose to make eye contact and it looked like he was "leering" at them
you also have to check the players nail lengths and basically if you even touch their hand to check sharpness you might get reported.
>Not grabbing the decoy, holding your dick against their head, then telling Chris and the popo that one false move will result in your dick going off
GET ME A CHOPPER, A BAG OF CHEETOS AND A PAIR OF SCHOOLGIRL PANTS
what crime? Oh yeah a thoughtcrime, because the "children" are adults. Make the show with real kids and have cops sitting in the next room then I'll watch an episode.
Americans in general are a very blood thirsty and violent people. They're constantly looking for someone to punish and vilify. We have to remember America is literally were all the worst people from Europe immigrated to because they couldn't stand being civilized.
It would have been fun to reverse troll Hansen, maybe show up with the transcripts printed and a bible, immediately begin confronting the decoy for her dangerous behavior and a need to repent. >ok, so when you typed “I’m gonna bleep your bleep so hard you’ll bleep” you were really just trying to engage the decoy in a way that would allow you eventual access to her to…preach to her?
Had a teacher in college that looked like this man. He was openly dating an 18 year old student. She was pretty decent looking, too. No clue how the frick he did it. Every time I see one of these hideous middle aged goons cruising for under age pussy and/or bussy on TCAP and think “how the frick did you not immediately know this was a setup? What kind of teen would frick your creepy John Waters looking ass”, I have to remind myself that it is indeed possible. There’s a hammer for every nail, I suppose.
Pedophiles (or in most cases just people trying to have sex with teens) are the only group of people left that you can openly hate and wish death upon without worrying about blowback.
>Becky… You have spent a significant percentage of your 13 years teasing sexually frustrated men that are old enough to be your father in AOL chat rooms. You raise their hopes for your own gratification and the dash them upon the ground like so many expired Caramel Delights. Loneliness has become an epidemic in this brave new world, and people like you would exploit that pain for your own amusement. I am sick of it. Sick of the flippant narcissism. Sick of the suffering you and those like you inflict. Sick of the disease that is eating me alive from the inside. I want to play a game. There is a small but powerful explosive device hidden in your dicky, which is currently sewed up at the labia. I am in possession of a scalpel. If you agree to make love to me, I will remove the device. If you try to open the stitches yourself, the device will be triggered and you will lose the game. Good luck.
My cousin is the DA, and he said that had these pedos framed the chat in this way from the start, there would be nothing Hansen could do. They wouldn’t be molesting them, the decoy would have a choice. The police would be furious, but the perp would walk every single time.
He didn’t know that. If you attempt to put a hit on your spouse and the hit man happens to be an undercover cop, you still get charged with attempted murder despite never having engaged with a hit man at any stage.
Nope. You’re legislating against actions. You can think about fricking kids 24/7 for the rest of your life. That is not a crime. If you attempt to find a child and engage in sex with a child, that is a crime.
He didn’t know that. His intent was to frick a kid. He was told it was a kid, he believed it was a kid, and he attempted to frick the kid. Both mens rea and actus rea are definitively established and it meets the legal threshold entirely
9 months ago
Anonymous
>the kid
What kid? Point to the kid. You mean his mental image of a kid? Did he pose a threat to this mental hallucination of a child?
Why are brainlets so incapable of separating the fact that pedophilia is wrong and deserves separation from society but any law based on imaginary victims is bad law?
9 months ago
Anonymous
Welp, these brainlets are your sitting Supreme Court Justices, as the laws are constitutionally sound and have been challenged and upheld many times. I’d rather be in that club then the “idiot on Cinemaphile who works at Burger King and thinks he’s smarter than he actually is” club
9 months ago
Anonymous
> Why are brainlets so incapable of separating the fact that pedophilia is wrong
Has nothing to do with pedophilia in and of itself. These stings happen for all kinds of crimes. It’s no different than trying to buy meth from an undercover cop. Do you think that’s not a crime because there was no meth?
9 months ago
Anonymous
Yeah, it's not a crime and no one will be arrested for it.
9 months ago
Anonymous
It is a crime, and many people have been arrested for it. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/can-cops-pretend-to-be-drug-dealers/
Your spouse actually exists, that's not a proper analogy.
A correct analogy would be if you tried to put a hit out on the Michelin Tire Man or some other equally fictional person and then were arrested for doing so.
All of these cases are literally by definition victimless crimes.
Nope. If you know the Michelin tire man does not exist and you try to put a hit on him, it is impossible to establish mens rea, because you know definitely that no such person exists. If you believe the Michelin tire man is a real person and you attempt to put a hit on him, you have in fact committed a crime.
You can't say nope and then confirm my analogy as valid. Nothing you just said contradicts my post in any way.
>Attempting to commit a crime against a fictional character is illegal. >All of these cases are literally by definition victimless crimes.
You were unable to refute either of these points and didn't even try, and actually validated them.
Welp, these brainlets are your sitting Supreme Court Justices, as the laws are constitutionally sound and have been challenged and upheld many times. I’d rather be in that club then the “idiot on Cinemaphile who works at Burger King and thinks he’s smarter than he actually is” club
In reality, it would be difficult to charge someone with attempting to put a hit on the Michelin tire man because he is an actual cartoon, so the analogy is already dubious. But if you could somehow prove that the would be killer thought it was a real guy and also, somehow, that it was not a crazy person despite thinking a man made of tires was real, then yeah, it could be upheld
Those are Cheetos you dumbass
>Those are Cheetos you dumbass
The most shocking thing about this show is they aren't immediately sketched out and bail on the whole thing. But artists can't into body language
Most of these guys are on the razor's edge between 'dumb guy' and medically recognized morons, some are full tards.
I think the ones who were smart enough to notice that the decoy girl wasn't interested/actually 13 were also smart enough to recognize a sting operation in the chatroom.
You've gotta be pretty dumb/desperate to bother to drive to some "13 year old" who you found in a sex chatroom house and expect everything to go smoothly.
True pedos are almost always moronic or close to it. It's one thing for a grown man to date some airheaded 17 year old, girls are kind of dumb at any age. It's another to be emotionally relating to and having extended conversations with a 12 year old
What you are describing is a mentally stunted person.
An actual true pedophile can be anyone of any mental capacity, they just have an uncontrollable lust for prepubescent children.
There are millions of true pedophiles in existence that have the mental capacity to avoid trying to diddle kids.
This. Its hard enough to carry a convo with a woman of any age but to talk to a teen? like wtf?
I've had extended conversations in my car travelling with my 12 old niece, what is wrong with you? People are really fricking unthinking NPCs.
So you read that sentence and thought, "well shit, I wanna frick my own niece, what's the problem?"
weird to talk about ur 12 year old niece in a pedo thread
You were entertained and engaged by a 12 year old? Mental midget
Also yeah why do you want to frick your neice?
women are dumb prostitutes at any age and men are dumb coomers at any age
I'm pretty autistic and bad in social situations, and even I can see how uncomfortable and wary the "kids" are.
Are you aware of the term post nut clarity? These guys are an example of guys who are not thinking clearly because of a lack of pussy. If they just rubbed one out before leaving they probably would have realized it was a bad idea.
Am I fricked up for feeling sorry for these fricking morons? or am I playing into their whole "act" of trying to be innocent and stupid and shit so people will feel sorry for them and they'll be victims when they get caught?
>Am I fricked up for feeling sorry for these fricking morons?
Yeah. There's nothing to be sorry about. Frick them.
You are right
You are a moron. They are trying to rape children. They are evil.
It's been a while but If I remember correctly they were actually trying to have consensual sex, not raped.
minors cannot legally consent in any case
Nor were there any minors involved at any point.
They didnt know that, they believed they were speaking to a minor
>announce to the world you're going to kill batman
>drive around the city looking for batman
>dont find him, give up and go home
Am I really guilty of anything other than being massively moronic?
You're certainly guilty of that, that's for sure.
Comparing something existent with something nonexistent. Quite moronic indeed.
Where is the totally existing minor he was trying to get with?
>announce to the world I'm going to buy cocaine
>meet up with someone who gives me a bag of white powder.
>said someone is actually a cop and the white powder is climbing chalk.
Am I really guilty of trying to buy cocaine? I didn't even get any.
No
You by definition did not buy cocain
Literally any lawyer could get you off on that context
If you're guilty of buying drugs from the cop then he's guilty of selling them
Lol
That's not how it works in the real world genius. There are vice squads and drug busts happen. However, I think all these string operations, trying to initiate a crime in order to catch a criminal, is just atrocious and anti-freedom. this is absolutely no way for a government that claims to derive it's power from the consent of the governed to behave. going around trying to turn people into criminals, into jihadists.
>What is attempted murder
isn't attempted murder a lesser crime? Are these guys getting locked away for attempted rape, or is it the same as someone who literally raped a child.
Not the point.
yeah but they don't get charged with statutory rape only conspiracy to commit it
ohhhh youre one of those people
Here it depends on the state. My state is 16. How old was this actress? She's at least 16, maybe 17. Not a child.
yet minors can legally choose to get their wieners chopped off and chug hormone pills at 14. Something ain't adding up here
>theoretical crime in progress
absolute fricking moron. Entrapment show is based.
They are not sorry for what they did or intended to do, they are sorry they got caught. Never confuse those things.
It is funny that even the lonely homosexuals here don’t understand that the allure for 90% of these guys isn’t the fact that the chick is underage. It is the fact that she showed interest in them
You’re not fricked up
They’re sad and they got tricked
nope, the law knows everything you believe and intend when you are chatting online in text only. they got frickin tom cruise waving his hands at the bat-computer saying "jarvis, show me what would have happened if this greasy guy actually went into this building and had sex with an underaged girl", and they go "yeah this is what that guy had in mind" after they wash the cum off their hands and desk
Literally every episode of this show I've seen they're all developmentally disabled and would have literally shown up to the house of any woman who talked to them regardless of her age.
THIS. They're still bad because they would have taken advantage of a younger girl but people need to realize they're opportunist predators rather than child predators as a whole. Still messed up though
I mean they were always doomed.
It's hard to feel sorry for people who prey on children, though. Most people, even many really fricked up people, will avoid harming children if they can, they have enough of a conscience to draw a line there. When people don't even have that basic instict, they're lost causes.;
>you need to cast a wider net, vincent, or you'll never find love
>"hmmm... 'all ages chatroom' sounds like it fits the bill..."
Hits the nail on the head pretty well. Lots of sad sacks out there, but they still know better than this. These guys gave up on any kind of morality. At least, any kind that doesn't directly serve them.
It's just that if you were a kid you would get fricked up the ass is all.
You aren't.
The show from the start was criticized because for many cases they were obviously coercing mentally unstable/extremely autistic guys and the bait was talking like an adult on the chat.
This is why in many countries it is explicitly illegal for the bait to ever show any interest or coerce the pedophile into action, or the whole sting is deemed unlawful and person cannot be arrested from it.
>unstable/extremely autistic guys
why is it always autistic guys that are prone to falling to societal ruses. I dont know anybody else falling for that
Because they're literally mentally moronic?
I hate to break it to you but autism is not a super power.
They are literally being led on by these actors, and yes actual 12 to 15 year olds are little bawds that would actually lead these poor bastards on anyway.
It's all fricking ridiculous.
>and yes actual 12 to 15 year olds are little bawds
Ayo homie what the frick?
>a child can lead on an adult so uh it's their fault
c'mon bro, don't be moronic
If both individuals consent there should be no one at fault
I've always been on the fence about this show, I do it enjoy though. I've decided that since no minors were involved at any point, they shouldn't be arrested. It makes no sense and reeks of "future crimes". I don't care what the law says, it's stupid. However being publicly exposed on TV should be their only punishment. That seems fair to me.
have a nice day
you were raped, haha
Yes but the perps had no idea at the time that there were no children involved, they were undertaking this endeavor with the knowledge (to them) that they were going meat and meat underaged individuals.
Yes. They only cry and plead out of self preservation. Their intentions are to get their rocks off with a child and ideally get away without getting caught. They don't give 2 shits about the kid getting hurt, raped, traumatized for life. They just want to use them like a toy and leave. The irony is lost on them when they plead for mercy, the mercy they would never consider for the kid they were about to rape.
>Projection: the post
>Seething pedophile: the post
LOL have you not seen how moronic the chatlogs are lmao theyre downie tier moronic turbo tards for falling for that shit
I feel sorry for some of them. Others are just fricked in the head.
Really depends a lot on their age, the age the decoy says they are, how explicit their chat is and what they do for a living. If you're a 26 year old doctor and you're being online moronic with a 17 yr 364 day female then we're the morons for making that illegal and a big deal.
Depends entirely on the circumstance. If the girl was larping as a 16 or 17 year old, you should feel bad for them. 16 is legal a lot of places all around the world, including certain states. Then you cross an arbitrary boundary and NOPE, YOU'RE AN EVIL SADISTIC MONSTER, YOU c**t, SHE WAS ONLY 2 MONTHS OLD (AFTER TURNING 18)
A lot of people on Cinemaphile like to feign outrage over it but these are also the same people who go to /b/ for the underage jailbait threads and e-girl threads, and are the first to sneak into dicky threads.
The true redpill is recognizing that anything 12 and under is truly despicable, but even that is arguable since God impregnated Mary when she was 12, giving birth to Jesus when she was 13.
With the exception of the 18 year old yes
Most of them are just pathetic lonely men trying to score technically illegal vagine. If the show focused on actual pedophiles you'd want to punch their faces in. But it's pretty rare to see them bait those guys. They recently got that democrat that prosecuted a bunch of /misc/gays for trying to meet up with a woman to frick her infant.
There was also one really dodgy case here where a guy got arrested for CP - he was talking to a decoy who saud they were 18...so legal age. But then the decoy said "what would you do to me if I were your little sister" and he got arrested for "producing" CP by detailing how he'd frick her if she was actually his little sister.
> producing" CP by detailing how he'd frick her if she was actually his little sister.
Gonna need receipts on that. This sounds impossible in America. e-girl/shotacon is a bit of a gray area in some states, but written words are solidly protected under the first amendment. Unless he was actively plotting to molest a child, but the. He wouldn’t be charged with CP, he’d be charged with attempting to have sex with a minor
Not America. Australia. American cops will often b8 British and Australian guys, which in that case fricking a 16 year old is not a crime, so they will encourage them to talk about illegal sexual desires, like beastiality or incest as a means to entrap them.
>Australia
Oh, that makes more sense. Australia has a really weird relationship with ethically dubious crime busts. There was a massive international news story that happened about 10 years ago where Australian police once operated a dark web CP site for a year and were in effect the single largest distributor of CP in the world during that time. Some Scandinavian journalist investigating the forum went to confront what he expected to be the pedo who operated the site, but was surprised to find out it was an Australian police department. Think they might have mentioned it on Mr Robot
>They recently got that democrat that prosecuted a bunch of /misc/gays for trying to meet up with a woman to frick her infant.
Wut
that guy looks like he does a shitload of drugs
They are probably below avg intelligence just getting fished. Chris Hansens is violating tenants of Christianity. He’s a Nazi.
If she had we’d there would be no crime. You can’t possibly tell me there is something wrong with this, you can just look at her.
The show is the problem.
>if she had sex
>Chris Hansens is violating tenants of Christianity
What do you mean? I'm actually curious
Don't encourage the pedo schizo
Did the Ravens at least win that night?
yeah 23-20 in OT
If your only intent is putting people in jail, the show, cops, and justice system is wrong in processing people and baiting them like this. It’s morally wrong. The “Predator” on these things actually don’t want to cause the “victim” any lasting harm.
This show is sexist in how it portrays young women as innocent. They aren’t at all.
I can’t wait until everyone that worked on to catch a predator has their face rotting off in the ground.
Thing is, you cannot bait someone who isn't looking for a victim. Non-pedos will never take the bait because they're not looking for kids to abuse in the first place.
So then israelites aren't responsible for degeneracy because anyone being entertained by the degeneracy must be looking for it to begin with?
Christians marry little girls in some states.
Any proof to back that up?
You spelled Muslims, Satanists, and Rabbis wrong.
BTW, each group I listed has at minimum a 2.5x higher rate of sex abuse crimes than Catholic priests and yet which group does the Satanic israelites in Hollywood create the stigma about?
Literally the synagogue of Satan up to their typical tricks. Pathetic.
>antisemitism in current year
Yikes!
Yes? Scapegoating a group is alot easier than admitting that the world around us IS the one we chose. But if a shadowy power group directing the show is what you need to not go insane then whatever helps you.
correctamundo
I'm sorry you have to tell all the neighbors about yourself when you move to a new place. That must be really annoying.
thats the fricked up part, the most they could charge them for is kidnapping, and i dont see any kids in that kitchen. and i'll be damned if i jail soke grown man for napping
Die pedo
This is literally how Black folk and israelites argue lmao.
>ya’ll just be tryin to put my boi in jail! It ain’t his fault someone left those tvs in the store winda!
>This show is sexist in how it portrays young women as innocent. They aren’t at all.
Oh boy
>Hey so listen we're working with this group that falsifies logs and lies to the cops
>so like, you're getting off scot free unless you violated probation so remember how the group harrassed you? Well, if they do that again, you know to block them and move onto actual underage kids to rape
>help stop the abuse of kids? no no no! We help pedos abuse them!
Why was Chris 'pedo defender' Hansen like this?
He just came to watch the Steewers and Wavens game
Would he be able to save them?
Most of the predators got a slap on the wrist if they were smart enough to lawyer up.
Going to the beach guy's case got tossed because they failed to turn over the hard drives from the computers they catfished him from.
What? No way!
mf built like a medieval behind-the-scenes royal adviser
He's built like this
Yeees yeeeeees
Haaaaaave a chIIIiiiiip
Putta da beer in da fridgeah.
I'm not gay. Yew can smell my breath.
you guys ever seen adam corollas To Catch a Contractor?
>paramount
i absolutely have not
There's anons that have starred on this show
For me it's oops guy.
The face of a predator mastermind
This dude was the most rat ass looking motherfricker I’ve ever seen. No sympathy
for me, its hambubger
I know it is an overrated choice but no one fricking beats Anthony Palumbo to me, 99% of the words out of his mouth are classic gold quotes
>39, 35, 39
>you can smell my breff
>betta put those in tha fridge (X4)
>don't get drunk off those
>my brotha, my otha brotha
>my excuse to come hea? Went to 'Lantic City
this dude lives rent free in my head
put those in tha fridge (X4)
kills me every time.
KEK AT THE END
>IM NOT GAY OR ANYTHING
>IM JUST SAYIN
>IM JUST SAYIN
>IM STRAIGHT
>IM JUST SAYIN
A true classic my friend
Hambubger was funny until it turned out just how evil he was - he'd molested and violent assaulted all of his daughters.
For me, it's donni1957_male. The guy's just so pathetic and sad it wraps around to being hilarious again.
I like the guy that started to pass out and then headbutted the table
genuine question do the producers get to eat the snacks the pedo brought over?
No
it becomes evidence so probably not. maybe after sentencing though
>it becomes evidence
Evidence of what? A strong appetite?
>"Your honor, the defendant tried to further entice the minor into underage sex acts with the use of snacks and candy."
Do you think you could actually go there just to hang out with literally no indication of wanting to frick or would they turn you down/force you to say something sexual before inviting you?
Just going to 'hang out' with a minor without their parents would probably be enough to arrest you for showing up
Arrest you for what?
Being friends with a child?
Yes.
That alone would not be sufficient grounds to arrest someone, although it can easily open the door to police involvement. If the child or parent complained, the police would tell the individual to cut it out. If it persisted despite the protests of the family, it wouldn’t be difficult to request some kind of restraining order, and if that was violated then an arrest could be made.
But generally you can’t arrest someone simply for being weird. Here’s an example of how this sort of thing goes down. Mind you, this guy literally ended up dying, but only because he was an idiot who happened to be carrying a stolen gun and he refused to comply. Had he not been carrying an illegal weapon or smoking weed the officer could see, he’d have been let go after being separated from the children. Granted, he was only 19 and we have no idea how old the girls were, but the officer seems to think they were visibly and obviously minors, so I’m guessing we’re talking 12-14 https://youtu.be/xZulxjlntps
> he refused to comply
Bit of an understatement. Dude literally opened fire on a cop
Fascinating video
That escalated quickly
>12 minutes
qrd
>19 year old man asks a gaggle of mall tweens how old they are and creeps them out, they find a cop and tell him what happened
>cop approaches man who has an open bottle of vodka under his arm and apparently a glass jar of weed somewhere on his person
>cop asks what he thinks he’s doing talking to a bunch of kids like that
>he says he only asked their age to make sure they were old enough
>cop says they clearly were not. Asks for his name, age yadda yadda
>cop gives him a warning for the booze and escorts him out of the mall
>at some point he notices the kid has weed on him, asks to search his bag
>kid refuses and starts to run, then turns and fires multiple shots at the cop
>cop can’t return fire because there are too many people
>kid runs to a car as backup arrives, guns blazing
>kid shoots himself in the head
>apparently had a stolen gun and was afraid of going to jail, so decided to make things 50,000 times worse for no discernible reason
I really want to know how old the girls were. If they were like 12, that would be one thing, but if they were ~16, i really don’t know what the problem is. He was 19, and this happened in Orlando. Florida has a 16-22 age of proximity law. If all he did was ask their age, I really don’t see how this is some major catastrophic thing. The kid’s just a bit of an awkward dumbass
The cop seems to think they were obviously children simply at a glance, so I would assume they were around 13 or something. But the cop handled the whole thing extremely patiently. The dude was drinking in public at 19, and the cop just told him to throw it out and asked him to leave. It’s not like he was being unreasonable, the dude just happened to also be carrying an illegal weapon and freaked out.
>illegal weapon
This is not a thing no matter how badly leftists want it to be
>woops I made a mistake time to reroll my life
I just can't believe how someone life can end like that.
he wans't some homeless junkie either
>you want a slice?
ROLE
PLAYING
CHATROOM
>*tom & jerry scream*
I guess it never happened so whatever, but I feel like this would be too risky for the decoy
What if they just took out a weapon and started slashing/blasting?
Would be funny as frick.
>that one decoy on the phone wearing a bulletproof vest
I think most of these guys were just lonely incels and the moment any female paid attention to them they were hooked
she's so hot, she looks like discount natalie portman I wonder if she does roleplay with her boyfriend
>Hey boo
CUTE!!!!!!!
Poor little chestlet, lmao. Everyone point and laugh.
I take it you haven't been on any social media app lately...
Of course not. I'm an old man.
Not even social media apps, fricking read anything about the types of groupies that attended 70’s rock band concerts. All horny jailbaits which didn’t stop any of those guys or even made anyone raise any eyebrows.
David Bowie literally got guardian rights to a 14 year old so he could frick her. The idea teen girls have no clue what they’re doing sometimes is just ignorance or delusional moralgayging
That was Ted Nugent, not David Bowie.
Easy mistake to make. They are both human males
For me, it's the Indian dudes who don't realise they've done anything wrong.
Why is it illegal to have sex with a 15 year old boy? Most 15 year olds fantasize about getting blown.
Not by grown men you gross homosexual
But what if the 15 year old is gay? I'm in my 20's btw.
>But what if the 15 year old is gay?
Still a child, you sich freak.
>t.
>fifteen is the same as eighteen
Yikers. I hope you have fun in prison, anon.
16 is legal where I am, so I've got some wiggle room.
>I've got some wiggle room
Not with God. Stop being a sick freak and get serious.
Frick off with your semitic nonsense, are even white?
>god
>semitic
did you read that in a NASCAR fb group?
When I was 15 I used to fantasize about blowing my swole tatted up male chemistry teacher, and also fantasize about fricking my female guidance counselor. If either happened I would probably not be so depressed at age 27
See? This proves my point, legalize 15 year old bussy.
Honestly yes, if either my guidance counselor or my chem teacher let me smash It would have had improved my self esteem and also my confidence dating later in life. The sexual experience especially with an experienced adult would have made many later sexual experiences that I actually did have less awkward if a 30 year old woman or man took me aside and gave me the business
No anon I'm pretty sure you not getting to live out your high school fantasies aren't the reason you are a miserable homosexual now.
If the predators brought the underage boy scissors to cut his wiener off, a pair of panties, and some hormone pills - Chris Hanson would have given them an award and the police would have posed for pictures
>Christian religion has required consent for marriage since its inception
>Most European feudal regions did not introduce their daughters to the public for courting until after 15
>Most records from churches in England at the time period reflect average ages of women being ~19 and men around 23
Christians didn't have child brides often sorry to disappoint but most fathers actually were in their children's lives and thus didn't want them getting fricked while they were still children.
Extremely rural region are the only places in most European Christian nations where you could find child marriages and that was more due to lack of choices then men wanting to be married to children.
What? In all cultures throughout most of time 12 13 etc were fine for wifes. Pedo is a modern law lmao.
As in if she was maturing young she was good to go....in all areas of the world as girls have always matured earlier than boys.
Rank the responses in terms of which produces the most to least kino TV:
>predator thinks Chris is the kid's dad and tries to explain why they're there
>predator thinks Chris is a cop and tries to explain himself
>predator bolts as soon as Chris appears and doesn't explain anything
>predator knows who Chris is and proceeds to sit and try to explain what is going on
what if someone acted happy when Hansen appeared, and claimed they were pretending to be a pedo to get on tv with Hansen.
Would work if they signed one of those afadavid things with a lawyer first to express their intent
Then he can just troll hansen with it
And if it WASNT a sting, he can just get teen pussy anyways lol
I always enjoyed the ones where they instantly recognize Chris. You can see their pedo hearts fricking sink to the floor instantly. Thinking Chris is the dad is my number 2.
you forgot J.Wehry:
> casually drop that you're looking for "Mr. Pedersen," in the hopes that Hansen is a fellow bus-coomer
Is it acceptable to have sex with a 13 year old girl as a 34 year old man? Asking for a friend.
Too old probably. Age gap too distant and girl still too young. Not sure what the best ratio is to be honest
Lmfao @ white people
Lmao. If a woman of any legal age asked me over to their house I’d be suspect.
Do pedophiles not have mirrors. Lil girls want Justin bieber, not balding crypt keepers.
Would. And I'd make her keep the hat on.
you sick frick
shes 18 you sick frick
anyone have a screenshot of the fat pedo looking directly at a hidden camera when he sees the male decoy
>pedo
He was just looking for a friend, he has many friends of all ages.
i cant believe people turn to child predation. im a 31 year old kissless virgin and i would never do this
methinks the lady doth protest too much
i assume that the only people they film are ones who actually did explicit things on the chat right like sending a nude pic of themselves? is it actually illegal just to converse with underage people in a sexual manner if you don't send explicit photos?
because theoretically a person could do all that then just show up with nothing and truthfully say they only went there to teach the kid not to do that
If you say you're going to lick a little girls pussy, then actually show up and walk in her door its intent. The chat is premeditation of the crime. And who the frick is stupid enough to say lewd shit and then show up to "teach her a lesson"? Nobody is going to believe you
Is this the only thoughtcrime which is convictable in court?
Yes, because we in live in an age where people like to pretend to be holier than thou. Reality is, most men are lying about who they find attractive.
>Y-YOU'RE JUST GIVING EXCUSES YOU SICKO
Sure thing, hypocrite.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24132774/
" Overall, these data suggest that men find pubescent girls identified as being under the age of consent sexually attractive, but inhibit their willingness to report this; the greater the attraction, the greater the inhibition. "
yeah, and i wouldn't have it any other way.
>9mm aspirin prescribed by Dr. Neuhausen
It isn’t a thought crime, it’s a crime-crime. They’re not being charged with wanting to frick a minor, they’re being charged with attempting to frick a minor. If you go stick up a bank but it turns out there’s no money in the vault, you still attempted to rob a bank.
But they aren't attempting to frick a minor, there is no minor, the minor is imaginary. Would you be charged with trying to rob an imaginary bank?
Yes. Whether you will be convicted or not is another matter. This is extremely common with the FBI on drug/terrorism cases. Famously a bunch of /misc/chuds walked free after it was shown the only people in their group that actually discussed their imaginary crime were the undercover feds themselves.
Local cops also do this with fake drug/pandering busts all the time.
>But they aren't attempting to frick a minor, there is no minor, the minor is imaginary.
Doesn’t matter. If you are told that a person is a child, you believe the person is a child, and you attempt to have sex with them, you attempted to have sex with a child. If you were told by police acting undercover that a building was a bank and you go try and rob it, you would probably be charged, yes.
Thought crime is not a real crime.
If you go to rob a bank but instead go to a vacant lot and do nothing, because there was never any bank to begin with, it seems like a pretty minor crime. I also don't know why they only use these "intent" laws for pedos and trump voters. You could bust half the population by promising them a lottery rigging system, fake drug sales etc.
>hate husband and want to hire hitman
>hitman.com
>pay for hitman, give him details of husband, etc
>hitman was actually a cop
>get arrested for trying to have a hitman kill your husband
MUH THOUGHT CRIME
Yeah this is another one you see quitw often. Seems pretty dubious legally to me. Conspiracy to commit is a grey area. Seems like it only applies when people feel like it.
>be me
>referee multiple sports right now soccer, girls lacrosse, and water polo
>a lot of the games i do are high school aged
>in soccer and lacrosse the girls are in shirts and shorts getting all sweaty
>in water polo its ridiculous girls in one piece swimsuits that are constantly riding up their asses
>feel like a pedophile creep the entire time
>and also in water polo especially, some of the girls and parents or coaches have actually reported referees for behavior they deem "inappropriate" for an adult male to do with a teenage girl even when it's in the scope of his refereeing duties
>some of the girls and parents or coaches have actually reported referees for behavior they deem "inappropriate" for an adult male to do with a teenage girl even when it's in the scope of his refereeing duties
They're pedos that are jealous.
theres a rule in water polo of what to do if a female breast is exposed by a player during a game
a ref got reported because he told some female player to get rid of her wedgie because the rules specifically state that suits have to cover the asscheeks but girls suits always ride up into almost a thong with their asses hanging out
a ref also got reported because he was talking to the players (in the pool) while standing on the deck and moved his sunglasses down his nose to make eye contact and it looked like he was "leering" at them
you also have to check the players nail lengths and basically if you even touch their hand to check sharpness you might get reported.
Frick womens' sports.
Coaches are very protective of their frick-meat, anon. Be careful.
https://www.kdh-law.com/articles/high-school-students-sexually-abused-by-coaches-come-forward/
https://abc7chicago.com/california-high-school-football-players-sexual-abuse-accusations-tiffany-strauss-gordon-colton-trainer/12302925/
https://www.fox43.com/article/news/crime/former-high-school-football-coach-charged-with-child-sexual-abuse-chester-county/521-45463a56-a489-41ba-a9e8-4f63e1850791
https://abc7.com/orange-county-cheer-coach-molestation-charges-erick-joseph-kristianson/13233069/
why would you willingly put yourself in this situation ?
to get paid to spend all day staring at prime poontang swimming in a pool
>Not grabbing the decoy, holding your dick against their head, then telling Chris and the popo that one false move will result in your dick going off
GET ME A CHOPPER, A BAG OF CHEETOS AND A PAIR OF SCHOOLGIRL PANTS
Why was he so greasy?
How else was he gonna slide into her DM's?
>show about catching degenerates ends up becoming comedy gold
how
How did the guys not notice the camera?
question: why are none of their faces blurred out?
You give up that right when you are actively committing a crime. Same reason all the perps on Cops don’t have their faces blurred out.
what crime? Oh yeah a thoughtcrime, because the "children" are adults. Make the show with real kids and have cops sitting in the next room then I'll watch an episode.
Americans in general are a very blood thirsty and violent people. They're constantly looking for someone to punish and vilify. We have to remember America is literally were all the worst people from Europe immigrated to because they couldn't stand being civilized.
It would have been fun to reverse troll Hansen, maybe show up with the transcripts printed and a bible, immediately begin confronting the decoy for her dangerous behavior and a need to repent.
>ok, so when you typed “I’m gonna bleep your bleep so hard you’ll bleep” you were really just trying to engage the decoy in a way that would allow you eventual access to her to…preach to her?
lol they actually were cheetos not chips womp womp
Had a teacher in college that looked like this man. He was openly dating an 18 year old student. She was pretty decent looking, too. No clue how the frick he did it. Every time I see one of these hideous middle aged goons cruising for under age pussy and/or bussy on TCAP and think “how the frick did you not immediately know this was a setup? What kind of teen would frick your creepy John Waters looking ass”, I have to remind myself that it is indeed possible. There’s a hammer for every nail, I suppose.
4 me is mickey mouse
What? No way!
yes it is , thanks
why is this board obsessed, and i do mean obsessed with this show? does it have anything to do with all the young actress posting?
Because Chuds like seeing themselves on television
Pedophiles (or in most cases just people trying to have sex with teens) are the only group of people left that you can openly hate and wish death upon without worrying about blowback.
>Becky… You have spent a significant percentage of your 13 years teasing sexually frustrated men that are old enough to be your father in AOL chat rooms. You raise their hopes for your own gratification and the dash them upon the ground like so many expired Caramel Delights. Loneliness has become an epidemic in this brave new world, and people like you would exploit that pain for your own amusement. I am sick of it. Sick of the flippant narcissism. Sick of the suffering you and those like you inflict. Sick of the disease that is eating me alive from the inside. I want to play a game. There is a small but powerful explosive device hidden in your dicky, which is currently sewed up at the labia. I am in possession of a scalpel. If you agree to make love to me, I will remove the device. If you try to open the stitches yourself, the device will be triggered and you will lose the game. Good luck.
My cousin is the DA, and he said that had these pedos framed the chat in this way from the start, there would be nothing Hansen could do. They wouldn’t be molesting them, the decoy would have a choice. The police would be furious, but the perp would walk every single time.
A crossover for the ages
just me, my mommy, and my daddy
The decoy is an adult, what crime did he commit? At every stage he was interacting with an adult
He didn’t know that. If you attempt to put a hit on your spouse and the hit man happens to be an undercover cop, you still get charged with attempted murder despite never having engaged with a hit man at any stage.
>He didn’t know that.
So are you going to legislate thoughts now? If you think something that makes it illegal?
Nope. You’re legislating against actions. You can think about fricking kids 24/7 for the rest of your life. That is not a crime. If you attempt to find a child and engage in sex with a child, that is a crime.
He didn't act against any kids. He was only with adults.
He didn’t know that. His intent was to frick a kid. He was told it was a kid, he believed it was a kid, and he attempted to frick the kid. Both mens rea and actus rea are definitively established and it meets the legal threshold entirely
>the kid
What kid? Point to the kid. You mean his mental image of a kid? Did he pose a threat to this mental hallucination of a child?
Why are brainlets so incapable of separating the fact that pedophilia is wrong and deserves separation from society but any law based on imaginary victims is bad law?
Welp, these brainlets are your sitting Supreme Court Justices, as the laws are constitutionally sound and have been challenged and upheld many times. I’d rather be in that club then the “idiot on Cinemaphile who works at Burger King and thinks he’s smarter than he actually is” club
> Why are brainlets so incapable of separating the fact that pedophilia is wrong
Has nothing to do with pedophilia in and of itself. These stings happen for all kinds of crimes. It’s no different than trying to buy meth from an undercover cop. Do you think that’s not a crime because there was no meth?
Yeah, it's not a crime and no one will be arrested for it.
It is a crime, and many people have been arrested for it. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/criminal-defense/can-cops-pretend-to-be-drug-dealers/
>the kid
What kid?
But I didn't hire a hitman.
Your spouse actually exists, that's not a proper analogy.
A correct analogy would be if you tried to put a hit out on the Michelin Tire Man or some other equally fictional person and then were arrested for doing so.
All of these cases are literally by definition victimless crimes.
Nope. If you know the Michelin tire man does not exist and you try to put a hit on him, it is impossible to establish mens rea, because you know definitely that no such person exists. If you believe the Michelin tire man is a real person and you attempt to put a hit on him, you have in fact committed a crime.
You can't say nope and then confirm my analogy as valid. Nothing you just said contradicts my post in any way.
>Attempting to commit a crime against a fictional character is illegal.
>All of these cases are literally by definition victimless crimes.
You were unable to refute either of these points and didn't even try, and actually validated them.
>appeal to authority
Concession status: Accepted.
In reality, it would be difficult to charge someone with attempting to put a hit on the Michelin tire man because he is an actual cartoon, so the analogy is already dubious. But if you could somehow prove that the would be killer thought it was a real guy and also, somehow, that it was not a crazy person despite thinking a man made of tires was real, then yeah, it could be upheld
The law is what it is. It doesn’t change because you’re too stupid to understand it.
This. moronic laws exist. There is nothing you can do about it except try to work around them.
>"I love to suck wiener, play and suck balls, play with and lick nipples, and lick and frick ass.".
Could they be arrested for trying to have sex with a human-animal hybrid? Do hybrids even have rights?
Not on Sweet Tooth they don’t. At least not yet. Eventually humanity dies out and Gus cpbecomes king of the hybrids and lives to a ripe old age.
>What? No Way!
>Wow! These are home baked
>cute though, built good