>Complains that Hollywood is too generic and formulaic
>Want the new Indiana Jones movies to be exactly like the old Indiana Jones movies
What the frick is their problem?
>Complains that Hollywood is too generic and formulaic
>Complains that Hollywood is too generic and formulaic
>Want the new Indiana Jones movies to be exactly like the old Indiana Jones movies
What the frick is their problem?
ITS OUT!!
also forcing rich to drink goyslop is too much
Yeah, they should force that whiny dry loser to pound hard alcohol with them instead.
Don't know who this youtuber is he looks like a fat dumbass, but Indy 5 is legitimately a terrible movie and deserves to fail
Hello ředdit
Mike said he didn't like that it had the same start from the formula.
WE INVENTED THE HARD CUT COMEDY BIT!!!
He didn't say that, Rolfe.
IM YELLING ISNT THAT FUNNY!!!!!
OH MY GOOOOOOOOO
YOU'RE STEALING YOUR HUMOR FROM THEM! YOU AREN'T FUNNY AT ALL YOU FRICKING FRAUD!
FRAUD! HACK FRAUDS!
Am I the only one that thought young Harrison Ford looked fine? The only issue was the voice.
I would describe young Harrison as jerky. You could tell there were brief moments where they took more effort, expecially on weird angles because they absolutely had to avoid it looking really bad, but they didn't put enough effort in other areas because he has almost a doll-like expression that looks copy-pasted. So one second it looks uncanny and the next is looks kind of ok.
That Jason State Man movie seemed alright from the trailer.
>14 seconds
wtf I'm convinced one of these frickers posts here
That's why we claim the Prequels are good movies, to get a rise out of them when they post here
Eh in that regard I think some here genuinely enjoy them, two of my friends irl are big fans of the prequels and one of them set his fricking profile picture to darth jar jar
I wasn't pretending.
have a nice day homosexual, the prequels are great
When you upload videos, you get automatically thrown into youtube studios so you probably wouldn't have the time to snap a screenshot 14 seconds after it gets uploaded
>open new private window
>open channel
>f5 spam
?
Yeah but why bother when you can make a snap like a minute after it's up. 14 seconds is probably a cosmic coincidence of OPgay clicking on right when it went public.
It's not hard to catch videos that early if you have notifications on.
All of them suck.
why are you guys mad? I mean, they didn't call out how fricking gay that moronic horse faced english c**t was- but the review was fine
That's reason enough to dislike it. They say she's not annoying. That's ridiculous.
it's so fricking insincere. just fricking admit woke politics and feminism are inappropriately being injected into these movies. why do they keep avoiding the issue or pretend it's not happening? this is why people like nerdrotic and critical drinker are becoming more relevant than them.
Rlm doesn't pander. They hardly even acknowledge they have fans. Meanwhile the people you mentioned do nothing but pander. Of course they will be more succesful.
Hilariously even people like "moist critical" are more daring than RLM. A typical redditor fence sitter now has more life in them. It's fricking grim how safe and tired RLM have become.
>this is why people like nerdrotic and critical drinker are becoming more relevant than them.
jesus christ, how embarrassing
they never adress woke shit because all their "friends" are into hardcore anal fisting
Jesus christ Jay is getting chubby. He's almost as fat as Mike
I don’t see it
I like as how mike gets fatter, rich gets slimmer, perfectly balanced.
>these tiktoks do be bussin tho! Even more so than cinema frfr!
Embarassing attempt Jay
>review turns into a 10 minute tiktok compilation of the shitty mcdonalds meme
He cute
how's he even aware of a tiktok trend.
I'm 22 and hadn't heard of it.
i guess his boyfriend's son showed it to him.
>They shouldve got rid of the entire opening and just have old Indy tell the troony how he stole the dial from the Nazi with her dad
Is Mike fricking moronic? The younger Indy opening is literally the only good part of this movie because the troony isnt in it yet.
The entire opening is CGI bullshit
How come Mike is the only person reviewing this movie who pointed that out?
>crystal skull BAD
>new Disney product GOOD
They are either the biggest contrarians or just brain damaged at this point.
They made Crystal Skull more compliments than I ever thought they would
they didn't say that though, just that DoD was better then CotKS
What did you expect after they gave the sequel trilogy good or passing reviews, but hated the prequel trilogy with a passion. They're just Disney shills. They even gave Thor 4 and Doctor Strange 2 good reviews.
>They're just Disney shills.
this is the key to the whole thing.
i 100% believe they are taking checks from disney.
honestly, if I were employed at disney I would be neglectful in my job if I didnt try to bribe them and other youtubers
>Disney shills
>Explicitly tells their audience bot to see the movie
Huh?
>Explicitly tells their audience bot to see the movie
lol you accidentally typed something that's too real
Except they hated Rogue One (the only decent nu-wars movie).
They said Crystal Skull had better action sequences and mostly shitting on Mangold. The only thing they liked in Dial of trannies was the last 10 minutes of nazis shooting at Romans. I think the only thing lacking was shitting on the bad actress playing Helena
At the end of the review, they all said it was not worth seeing.
Stop posting on Cinemaphile you ESL moron
They praised crystal skull a fair bit.
Almost every remake and reboot pumped out now has the same “new character takes the mantle without having earned it and legacy character(s) are just there as tired decor” formula. Top Gun played so close to the original that it was actually new for a current reboot
It does come off as hypocritical after their complaints that Crusade is weak because it’s like Raiders, though.
Crusade sucked
There is a middle ground between making a lazy copy of the original movie and making feminist sequel-boot trash
Dial didn’t feel like the same “we have a focus group saying we can sell more girl toys” energy from the SW sequels, it felt even more cynical with that Disney wanted to replace their aging star with one of the few young-ish but established celebs that would return their calls and do more.
Basically even more of a meandering and pointless reason to happen which fits the purposeless nature of this movie
They loved the ending even though for me that's where the movie completely fell apart. Ballistas shooting down an airplane? Indy being reduced to a mansel in distress with no agency? Indy being moronic and getting KO'd by a 90 pound woman in one punch?
>Indy survives getting FRICKING SHOT POINT BLANK IN THE CHEST
>Gets instantly KO'd by the power of feminism
I hate this b***h and all of her self insert brunette horseface characters so fricking much.
Given that the force was a mystical unknown spiritual power that went through all life in the galaxy, it is so fricking stupid to attach a genxer to it. You didn't see Star Wars fans with The Force is for Guys shirts. Most fans welcomed any girls into Star Wars. And we had plenty of female heroines before Rey.
Kathleen Kennedy loves to act like Star Wars was this regressive sexist dinosaur before she got to it even though it basically created the concept of the action movie heroine as we know it.
This is the story of judaic subversion of european pop culture in a nutshell.
Comics, sci fi shows, dungeons and dragons, etc. All need to be "fixed" for being regressive, sexist, outdated, etc.
Meanwhile these are the things that pushed society forward in terms of progressiveness. They tell the normalgays that "this is the first female/black/gay/etc hero/moviestar/captain/etc." And the normalgays believe them because they have no frame of reference as they spent their whole lives disregarding all this as "nerd shit for losers."
They dont care about pissing off woke journos, they will not comment on obvious woke shit, however they liked the last 10 minutes for at least being a ridiculous schlock instead just boring
Exactly. The entire review is them talking about how boring and lifeless the movie was, seems they were just glad to have something that didn’t make them feel like they were dead and didn’t know it
I almost liked that scene but the physics of shooting down a plane with ballistas was infuriating because planes move so fast. That's like watching Indiana Jones catch a bullet with his bare hands level of preposterous.
The woke shit at the end absolutely ruined it for me. And it was woke, that's the only possible motivation for making Indy act so out of character and taking away all of his agency in how his own story wraps up. It's like if Henry Sr. knocked him out to stop him from trying to reach the grail in Last Crusade. There is no emotional payoff, we don't get to see Indy doing the right thing, it all felt so fricking phony and un-earned, and it was clearly only there as an indulgence for Kathleen Kennedy's ego. And I hope Disney crucifies her for the movie's box office returns.
If you believe the pretty widespread rumors, he was supposed to stay in the past and die, so the breakneck change and a light punch knocking him out long enough to time travel, traverse 2 continents, and be patched up was to change that. It felt phony because it as an hour long tacked on change to a movie that didn’t need to exist to begin
Hollywood IS too generic and formulaic.
The old Indiana Jones film would be a breath of fresh air compared to the generic and formulaic shit of current year.
The formula of today is to take the old Indiana Jones and tear him down. You cannot have the original Indiana Jones films everyone loved. You can't have a beloved character doing what they did in the orignal films. You have to deconstruct him and have some new wave feminist mouth piece berate fans on why the old films were bad.
Indiana Jones was a throwback to the adventure movie heroes George Lucas loved as a kid, and the Scrooge McDuck comic books he used to read. He wasn't taking the pulp serial hero and deconstructing him, he was elevating it and making it into something even better.
Nobody wanted a deconstruction of Indiana Jones. The whole point of Indiana Jones is that he's a romanticized adventure hero, and if you deconstruct him you're left with a shallow husk of an IP. And Disney is getting the box office they deserve after years of dodging their karma.
>Nobody wanted a deconstruction of Indiana Jones.
Nobody wanted a deconstruction of Luke Skywalker either, but here we are.
After Kathleen Kennedy's career is over I hope the next era of cinema is a "reconstruction era."
How much left until KK is LITERALLY FIRED from Disney, Doomwiener?
i dont think she will ever be fired. I think she has manouvered herself to stay safely on the helm of the ship, however she did it.
Tbf you can deconstruct the hero where he's at the bottom, but later on during the movie reconstruct him and bring him back to his former glory by making him a legend at the end.
And that's just the thing, the movie deconstructed Indy and let him go out on a pathetic whimper. The only redeeming moment is that his wife forgives him at the end, and it's Fleabag who actually calls her, not Indy.
It doesn't even matter, they are not going to let her make anything until she's gone even if it means years of no new content from Lucasfilm. In any case this is the end of her career as an executive producer at Lucasfilm even if it's not the end of her salaried position.
You can do a deconstruction and still have it be a fun movie. The good the bad and the ugly is basically a deconstruction of westerns but it's still a very fun western movie.
Is this worth watching or is it another boring dead fish of a "review" made by people obviously scared of being cancelled by the left?
RLM has never really given a shit about either side of culture war bullshit so it’s not really a concern there
>never really given a shit about either side of culture war bullshit
Lol, have you seen their Prey review?
I think they like to give that impression but it's obviously bullshit. Hugely dishonest post.
I don’t know what any of them say in their off time but at least in their videos it’s pretty milquetoast takes and skimming over anything leftoids or rightoids scream about online in relation to a movie
>Phoebe Waller-Bridge is charismatic as hell!
>She wasn't annoying at all!
>Mutt tho was bad and boring! Nobody likes him!
i am starting to hate these disney shills
Why did you lie about two of these statements? It's so strange, one of them is what they actually said and two others were made up by you. Why were you so selective?
>it's a Rich episode
Pass, and to this day I'm still not sure if he's affecting that queer laugh
>geriatric adventure hero
Top fricking kek, this is even worse than capeshit. How could they possibly have come up with something this monumentally stupid?
They're right.
Mike: "People find fleabags character to be annoying. I don't. I guess some people don't like her for some reason though?"
Jay: "You're not supposed to like her, she's unlikable on purpose."
Mike: "Right, but she cares about her dad, that's why she wants the macguffin!"
Jay: "Forget about that, the movie does!"
Later they complain about how jokes revolving around how much better fleabag is than Indy don't land. They express confusion as to why the punchline of a joke being "Fleabag is the best ever!" is not funny.
I think the funniest thing is that they went out of their way to show they fricked up the sound on the original recording. Add that too the list of great cinematic achievment and excellence these guys exhibit when not critiquing cinematic achievement and excellence in others works.
this is just their off the cuff, unrefined thoughts after seeing it
like their collective hangup about the hell no we won't go joke bit, it just needs to sit in their minds for a little longer
i'd watch a plinkett review tbqhwydeshou
Cinemaphile is finally realizing that the e-celeb ginger dwarf that they loved soo much is a huge homosexual...you guys need to realize RLM is garbage now
I feel devastated honestly. It's like my friends are drifting away. We don't have much in common anymore.
>the e-celeb ginger dwarf that they loved
Literally who
>the writing and directing was bad
>only the last 10 minutes was good in a shlocky way
>don't go see it
>but it was an okay movie though
One of their weirdest reviews. Are they in denial or something?
Have you never seen a movie that was just "eh its ok" but wouldn't really recommend it to anyone. The robocop reboot comes to mind for me.
>>but it was an okay movie though
only Rich said that
>Are they in denial or something?
that's a river in egypt, but that's not important right now
no but yeah, i no longer watch their reviews, it's pointless. i only watch wheel of the worst any more and that is rapidly also becoming less fun.
They refuse to acknowledge that Hollywood is in the business of making propaganda.
I don't know how anyone can take these dweebs seriously.
They are part of the propaganda at this point - they would clap if they got female indiana jones. they refuse to accept that there's anything wrong with replacement
None of these points are contradictory
>rich has Z on his cap
WTF!!!!
Has Rich lost weight or is his shirt hiding his fatness?
he lost weight about two years ago I think? but he has been putting some of it back on lately.
they're tasteless morons without culture, always been
good for you for finally realizing it
why do they refuse to call out the white genocide