>literalwho from twitter deciding what the SAG and WGA considers scabbing
yeah, cosplayers aren't getting blacklisted. that would be dumb as frick. this is just some dumbfrick on twitter trying to come up with some hot take that will drum up engagement so they can shill whatever it is they are selling, while deriding capitalists who do the same shit they are doing with a different paintjob
Crazy how leftists just change the meanings of words whenever they want. How the frick is it scabbing if you're not in the fricking union? How is it scabbing if what you're doing has nothing to do with the company they're striking against apart from using the fricking IMAGE of their intellectual property which they can't profit off? Reminds me of them trying to israelite their way into making their demands seem reasonable by saying shit like >Increased penalties for failing to ensure proper breaks
Without saying what the original penalties were, or what their offers were.
>How the frick is it scabbing if you're not in the fricking union?
you don't have to be part of the union to be a scab. anyone can cross the picket line and offer to work. the problem is that anyone who does takes away bargaining power from the union.
But they're not doing that, none of these cosplayers are volunteering to be actors, they're doing their original fricking job of cosplaying. I don't know why you'd bring up someone offering to take their job while they're occupied striking when it has nothing to do with this situation. If you'd read the rest of my post you'd know that was just one component in a list of things that made this impossible to be described as scabbing.
> I don't know why you'd bring up someone offering to take their job while they're occupied striking when it has nothing to do with this situation.
because that is what scab is and the discussion is about what scabs are? > If you'd read the rest of my post you'd know that was just one component in a list of things that made this impossible to be described as scabbing.
that's why i highlighted what i was responding to. but anyways, to further respond and add on to what i said in my own full post, it's about engagement. these twitter/hollywood fricks have terminally destroyed their brains and understanding of reality through the lens of views/clicks/engagement. whatever drives engagement in any way is considered crossing the picket line in their eyes because engagement with the product allows for lessened bargaining power on the end of the union because they already got the engagement.
But these people aren't doing that, so you're being a dishonest homosexual bringing up something that has nothing to do with the situation at hand. >That's why I highlighted
Bullshit, if the rest of the point elaborates on what I'm saying then cutting out a small part to make an argument no one is disagreeing with, or even discussing because it doesn't apply to the situation is only to do one thing, and that's act like a dishonest homosexual to create a connection where none exists. Engagement has literally never been a metric for scabbing otherwise people buying the products of companies on strike would be called scabs, this is a newly made up version of that which has nothing to do with what really being a scab is to shame people for not immediately bowing to the demands of a bunch of powerless dress toting homosexuals.
Thank you for your concession you smooth brained monkey.
11 months ago
Anonymous
>to make an argument no one is disagreeing with >Thank you for your concession you smooth brained monkey.
i literally agreed with you that cosplay is not scabbing, though. only one here trying to make an argument is you. relax, brother.
11 months ago
Anonymous
Another gay backtrack. That wasn't what you were arguing when you brought that up in contention, now that you've been exposed for being fricking moronic you want to say otherwise. It would be one thing if you were just elaborating, but you literally chose to cut my post up, disagree with it, and make a claim no one was making. Eat shit and die.
Crazy how leftists just change the meanings of words whenever they want. How the frick is it scabbing if you're not in the fricking union? How is it scabbing if what you're doing has nothing to do with the company they're striking against apart from using the fricking IMAGE of their intellectual property which they can't profit off? Reminds me of them trying to israelite their way into making their demands seem reasonable by saying shit like >Increased penalties for failing to ensure proper breaks
Without saying what the original penalties were, or what their offers were.
This is probably a good idea considering how big actual scabbing is in "nerd" shit. No one wants to see cosplayers on the big screen because they were willing to work for exposure.
acting and writing isnt real work. kind of hilarious that THIS is the "workers struggle" that the media is focusing on. meanwhile kids in china are pulling lithium out of the ground for these homosexual's new iphones and NORMAL people across america are struggling to make end's meat but oooooo please please please worry about the Hollywood writers and actors who wont be able to afford their next adrenachrome party. those poor satanic hollywood homosexual pedophiles 🙁
the amount of privilege actors and writers have is disgusting. there are people out there actually risking their lives for a fraction of the income these scumbag "entertainers" get
Yeah they expect to maintain upper class Californian life while working literally 4 days a month, sometimes less.
Those homosexuals of course are not gonna get another job because their skillset is sitting on their asses and imagining things and they are too good for waitering and shit
They all feel threatened by AI that's why they included a "non-AI EVER" clause because they know the moment AI is slightly worse but cheaper the studios will fire them all, at least AI doesn't complain nor goes on strike.
Which is moronic because if they had negotiated correctly they could have come out ahead by copywriting their specific faces, writing styles, etc... And having studios, advertising, and etc.. pay licensing agreements for each use.
They could have literally all retired and sat back for the rest of their lives licensing their images and the work they'd train the AI on. Now the companies will definitely 100% replace them the moment it becomes viable and this is going to be the major motivation, especially after the massive string of flops this past year.
jews (actors/writers) vs super israelites (studios)
studios will just figure out a way to get past those copyrights/licensing fees
same reason why movies never ever break even
the guilds are smart enough to realize this
I hope they all burn
I'll be waiting for my japanese programmed holodeck snowboarding waifu in the meantime
They would have no motivation to if it was a hundred times more affordable. The human element of marketing movies is still incredibly important, but not for long, and these morons had a chance to make their money during the transition period, and go with the wind. Instead they literally created the biggest reason to israelite them as hard as possible because now they've proved for a fact they're more trouble than they're worth, and that they will use the influence that's supposed to be serving super israelites on swaying the public into donating to their gofundmes.
Fortunately corpos are gonna corpo.
They might have delayed their impending doom but they are done because in the end it's about money and money is all corpos care about even if they sometimes fool gullible morons by putting colorful avatars on their social media.
>THIS is the "workers struggle"
It's all the same. Corporations wants to screw all their workers and extract max profit off their labor. All workers want a bigger return on their labor. It doesn't mater the job or company. I see zero reasons to support the studios on the issue.
are they after their corporates overlords to pay them fairly or are they idiots trying to attack innocent citizens that have nothing to do with their fight?
this is not union behavior
this has so little to do with a union I don't think SAG should even pretend they're not a club of morons who don't know what money is much less what a union is supposed to do.
And people wonder why some people don't like unions. I saw comments that say even reviewing and critiquing a movie is a form of promotion and scabbing and the guy had to point out that even in the guidelines that movie reviews are not considered scabbing.
SAG shouldn't test the current Supreme Court on this.
Unions have certain exemptions from anti-trust laws. But their activities must be related to the core labor dispute.
Actors commonly promote films at conventions and social media in roles they have appeared in. Actors do not usually show up at conventions dressed up like the characters in a film they did not star in. That's booth babe and cosplay work. Imagine if a waste management union could blacklist bus boys at restaurants because they take garbage to dumpsters. It's the picking up and transport of garbage that is the domain of the waster management union, not shit like being trash to a dumpster.
>if you cosplay characters owned by studios you're a scab >if you tweet images of characters owned by studios you're a scab >if little Timmy buys a toy of a character owned by a studio he's a scab >if you mention characters owned by a studio you're a scab >if you conjure up an image in your head of a character owned by a studio and think about him you're a scab
Just when you think this shit can't get any more moronic the chromosomes double.
That's a funny line, anon.
yeah nice one, I'm going to steal it
uhhh what?
they're mighty threat is that they will ban those influencers from joining the union
Literally who
>this organization that has nothing to do with you or paying you money demands you to do X so do it
SAG has said that any actor who 'crosses the picket line' will be permanently banned from SAG membership.
So this potentially hits any cosplayer that harbours delusions that they will ever make it as an actual actress.
>literalwho from twitter deciding what the SAG and WGA considers scabbing
yeah, cosplayers aren't getting blacklisted. that would be dumb as frick. this is just some dumbfrick on twitter trying to come up with some hot take that will drum up engagement so they can shill whatever it is they are selling, while deriding capitalists who do the same shit they are doing with a different paintjob
>How the frick is it scabbing if you're not in the fricking union?
you don't have to be part of the union to be a scab. anyone can cross the picket line and offer to work. the problem is that anyone who does takes away bargaining power from the union.
I don't care for either the WGA nor whatever corpo they're striking against. They can both crash and burn for all I care.
But they're not doing that, none of these cosplayers are volunteering to be actors, they're doing their original fricking job of cosplaying. I don't know why you'd bring up someone offering to take their job while they're occupied striking when it has nothing to do with this situation. If you'd read the rest of my post you'd know that was just one component in a list of things that made this impossible to be described as scabbing.
> I don't know why you'd bring up someone offering to take their job while they're occupied striking when it has nothing to do with this situation.
because that is what scab is and the discussion is about what scabs are?
> If you'd read the rest of my post you'd know that was just one component in a list of things that made this impossible to be described as scabbing.
that's why i highlighted what i was responding to. but anyways, to further respond and add on to what i said in my own full post, it's about engagement. these twitter/hollywood fricks have terminally destroyed their brains and understanding of reality through the lens of views/clicks/engagement. whatever drives engagement in any way is considered crossing the picket line in their eyes because engagement with the product allows for lessened bargaining power on the end of the union because they already got the engagement.
But these people aren't doing that, so you're being a dishonest homosexual bringing up something that has nothing to do with the situation at hand.
>That's why I highlighted
Bullshit, if the rest of the point elaborates on what I'm saying then cutting out a small part to make an argument no one is disagreeing with, or even discussing because it doesn't apply to the situation is only to do one thing, and that's act like a dishonest homosexual to create a connection where none exists. Engagement has literally never been a metric for scabbing otherwise people buying the products of companies on strike would be called scabs, this is a newly made up version of that which has nothing to do with what really being a scab is to shame people for not immediately bowing to the demands of a bunch of powerless dress toting homosexuals.
Thank you for your concession you smooth brained monkey.
>to make an argument no one is disagreeing with
>Thank you for your concession you smooth brained monkey.
i literally agreed with you that cosplay is not scabbing, though. only one here trying to make an argument is you. relax, brother.
Another gay backtrack. That wasn't what you were arguing when you brought that up in contention, now that you've been exposed for being fricking moronic you want to say otherwise. It would be one thing if you were just elaborating, but you literally chose to cut my post up, disagree with it, and make a claim no one was making. Eat shit and die.
we must replace the screen actors guild with the film actors guild
We will usher in a new era of peace. Through talking instead of violence. That, is the F.A.G. way
Any cosplayer worth their salt coombaits on anime twitter and opens an only fans
If cosplayers are scabs then scratch me til I bleed
Do the cosplayers get compensation for this?
who cares, only uggos cosplay from shitty western tv shows, all the bawdtiest outfits are from anime and videogames
Crazy how leftists just change the meanings of words whenever they want. How the frick is it scabbing if you're not in the fricking union? How is it scabbing if what you're doing has nothing to do with the company they're striking against apart from using the fricking IMAGE of their intellectual property which they can't profit off? Reminds me of them trying to israelite their way into making their demands seem reasonable by saying shit like
>Increased penalties for failing to ensure proper breaks
Without saying what the original penalties were, or what their offers were.
This is probably a good idea considering how big actual scabbing is in "nerd" shit. No one wants to see cosplayers on the big screen because they were willing to work for exposure.
Oh look it's another group telling you how to live your life so they can benefit.
Hope they crash and burn.
acting and writing isnt real work. kind of hilarious that THIS is the "workers struggle" that the media is focusing on. meanwhile kids in china are pulling lithium out of the ground for these homosexual's new iphones and NORMAL people across america are struggling to make end's meat but oooooo please please please worry about the Hollywood writers and actors who wont be able to afford their next adrenachrome party. those poor satanic hollywood homosexual pedophiles 🙁
the amount of privilege actors and writers have is disgusting. there are people out there actually risking their lives for a fraction of the income these scumbag "entertainers" get
Yeah they expect to maintain upper class Californian life while working literally 4 days a month, sometimes less.
Those homosexuals of course are not gonna get another job because their skillset is sitting on their asses and imagining things and they are too good for waitering and shit
They all feel threatened by AI that's why they included a "non-AI EVER" clause because they know the moment AI is slightly worse but cheaper the studios will fire them all, at least AI doesn't complain nor goes on strike.
Which is moronic because if they had negotiated correctly they could have come out ahead by copywriting their specific faces, writing styles, etc... And having studios, advertising, and etc.. pay licensing agreements for each use.
They could have literally all retired and sat back for the rest of their lives licensing their images and the work they'd train the AI on. Now the companies will definitely 100% replace them the moment it becomes viable and this is going to be the major motivation, especially after the massive string of flops this past year.
jews (actors/writers) vs super israelites (studios)
studios will just figure out a way to get past those copyrights/licensing fees
same reason why movies never ever break even
the guilds are smart enough to realize this
I hope they all burn
I'll be waiting for my japanese programmed holodeck snowboarding waifu in the meantime
They would have no motivation to if it was a hundred times more affordable. The human element of marketing movies is still incredibly important, but not for long, and these morons had a chance to make their money during the transition period, and go with the wind. Instead they literally created the biggest reason to israelite them as hard as possible because now they've proved for a fact they're more trouble than they're worth, and that they will use the influence that's supposed to be serving super israelites on swaying the public into donating to their gofundmes.
Fortunately corpos are gonna corpo.
They might have delayed their impending doom but they are done because in the end it's about money and money is all corpos care about even if they sometimes fool gullible morons by putting colorful avatars on their social media.
>THIS is the "workers struggle"
It's all the same. Corporations wants to screw all their workers and extract max profit off their labor. All workers want a bigger return on their labor. It doesn't mater the job or company. I see zero reasons to support the studios on the issue.
Everyone involved, from the picketers to the studios are subhuman and want you hooked up to a pain machine to watch you scream.
are they after their corporates overlords to pay them fairly or are they idiots trying to attack innocent citizens that have nothing to do with their fight?
picketers = clowns
this is not union behavior
this has so little to do with a union I don't think SAG should even pretend they're not a club of morons who don't know what money is much less what a union is supposed to do.
And people wonder why some people don't like unions. I saw comments that say even reviewing and critiquing a movie is a form of promotion and scabbing and the guy had to point out that even in the guidelines that movie reviews are not considered scabbing.
Strikes are fricking gay. Picket lines are fricking gay. Actors and writers are fricking gay.
Debate me, you will lose
I like the positivity, daddy-o! You're a gay guy yourself!
How long until anyone not standing next to them with a sign or buying them pizza is considered a CEO?
these "people" have been chomping at the bit to be heroes again now that COVID is over
!kino thread alert!
no way thats legit
DO NOT EVEN THINK ABOUT MOVIES. DO NOT SPELL MOVIE, DO NOT SAY MOVIE. IF YOU SEE A MOVING PICTURE MOVE ALONG CHUD
Do they think most cosplayers get paid for playing dress up? Is this how detached they are from reality?
Personally most do. I get paid to dress up by a rich benefactor. He has a cool guy fetish and he likes seeing a really cool guy hang out in a dress
it's about influencers not just cosplayers
wtf I hate labor now. But seriously we can't let strikers get the nuclear codes
content creators and influencers are absolute filth
Arrested Development Season 4 wasn't supposed to be a documentary!
How can someone who isn't an employee cross the picket line? That's moronic.
They can't. It's the same nonsense as saying "if you don't support BLM/Antifa you're a racist/fascist"
SAG shouldn't test the current Supreme Court on this.
Unions have certain exemptions from anti-trust laws. But their activities must be related to the core labor dispute.
Actors commonly promote films at conventions and social media in roles they have appeared in. Actors do not usually show up at conventions dressed up like the characters in a film they did not star in. That's booth babe and cosplay work. Imagine if a waste management union could blacklist bus boys at restaurants because they take garbage to dumpsters. It's the picking up and transport of garbage that is the domain of the waster management union, not shit like being trash to a dumpster.
I don't get it, weren't they the good guys fighting the big bad oppressors? Why are they being the evil oppressors?
These fricking homosexuals really want everyone to hate them don't they
>if you cosplay characters owned by studios you're a scab
>if you tweet images of characters owned by studios you're a scab
>if little Timmy buys a toy of a character owned by a studio he's a scab
>if you mention characters owned by a studio you're a scab
>if you conjure up an image in your head of a character owned by a studio and think about him you're a scab
Next thing you'll tell me if I go watch a movie at theaters I'm a scab
If Shirogane-sama goes on strike I will lose it.
god ecelebs culture is fricking cancer now, I hope they get into the shitters next
I hope this moron causes a rift between actors and cosplayers
This only affects cosplayers that want to someday join Hollywood, right? so none of them?
NON
ESSENTIAL
WORKERS