>decisions are being made by committees, and art does not do well when it's made by committee," Johnson answered. "Films are made by a filmmaker and a team of artists around them. You cannot make art based on numbers and algorithms. My feeling has been for a long time that audiences are extremely smart, and executives have started to believe that they're not. Audiences will always be able to sniff out bullshit. Even if films start to be made with AI, humans aren't going to fricking want to see those.
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
>old bag throws a shitfit after her movie flops, even though she read the script and agreed to be in it
don't care!
Not every PC of you.
christ, it's always "shitfit" "meltdown" "spergout" with you people.
How does someone express something in text calmly? Please, for the love of god, let us all in on your big secret.
Check out this spaz sperging out.
it's actually a sperg spazzing out, cringelord
By not whining about it.
You failed that class buddy!
I bet this b***h asks for films to have a diverse crew and she doesn't realize the contradiction
I disagree
>"I hate committees!"
>In 2018, she collaborated with 300 women in Hollywood to set up the Time's Up initiative to protect women from harassment and discrimination.
>digging this garbage up just to make no point whatsoever
What did thr troony mean by this?
am i supposed to be mad now /misc/?
What does that post have to do with /misc/?
nta but you seem pretty upset right now.
>wokeslop loses billions
>even woke actresses shit all over it
Why would I be mad?
>Chris Martin, what are you doing on a petition for Black folk? It's mental!
I dun get it
career suicide
that's not a committee on the content of a movie
she's talking about making movies, not social issues you stupid frick.
I agree. In no way could there be overlap between canceling actors and filmcrew on social issues and the actions of filmmakers in making new pictures.
yes there is some overlap, but the issue she's talking about is the process of making the movie and scripts. They have a group in charge of major decisions when it should be left to the director and creative staff.
Except her and people like her are the reason they have to do that. You have to have 50 useless people checkboxing every little thing to make sure it was all equitable now and that no joke is perceivably harmful to an alphabet person or marginalized group.
This has been a problem long before DEI was a thing in movies.
>art shouldn't be made by a group-approved flowchart
>"i hate committees!"
are you trying to be moronic? If so, great work.
>"I champion social issues from BLM, defund the police, #MeToo and every other DEI initiative."
>"Ugh, why are films made by committee now? When did social issues and making sure we check the right boxes to avoid people exactly like myself canceling them become so big?"
I hope the next time you dilate that you stab too deep and 40% yourself.
Disingenuous dumbass.
Triggered troony.
Holy based disingenuous analogy just to make people seethe, I wish I’d thought of it.
How come the poster count didn't go up between you and the last "disingenuous" poster a few minutes ago?
You obviously miscounted. And I wasn’t being sarcastic, it’s obviously disingenuous but it’s also very funny.
You made every troony ITT lose his shit, well done.
MeToo is absolutely the cancer that killed art in Hollywood and this b***h was one of its handmaidens.
I like how obvious it was they had a little board meeting to decide on the name Times Up because they couldn't just steal the name MeToo
Cinemaphile is going to seethe about this purely because she says people won't watch their 80s dark fantasy AI generated films.
Trannies are seething purely because even the cast hated Madame Wokeslop
Who?
She sounds as moronic as her audience.
>digs up a different pile of garbage
You're boring, troony
she hasn’t starred in a single good movie. no, I won’t count
>Bad Times
>Peanut Butter Falcon
>that one remake of a much superior film
>art by committee sucks!
Wow, groundbreaking revelation there. I guess she proved she’s more than a set of holes. She’s got, like, opinions on things and stuff.
Women who use profanity are unattractive.
Why are people like you on Cinemaphile?
Profanity, outside of extremely rare cases, is just low class and most likely a sign of bad genetics.
>Even if films start to be made with AI, humans aren't going to fricking want to see those.
Oh, you just fricking wait and see, Dakota.
She's right, though.
I think alot of audiences will have zero interest in seeing a movie made by a computer.
There will be alot who won't, but the average audience will take whatever is offered.
People go to the movies because it's something to do. There doesn't have to be a good movie playing.
I wouldn't pay to see anyone else's AIslop, but I'd be happy if I could generate my own.
All they need is a 70 second trailer that looks like something even slightly cohesive that feeds into whatever the cultural boom is at the time, and people will be lining up to see that shit. If anything, they'll be going to see it so they can post about how "crazy it was" on reddit. I wouldn't be surprised if A24 would be one of the first to try it out.
Woke sisters, response? The chuds are kinda winning and getting too comfortable, I’m getting nervous
Her fault is thinking that capeshit is an art to begin with
So basically she laments how formulaic and and anti-creative the movie industry is. But, it is that way because of the ideologies that need pushed, the interpersonal politics that need entertained, and the insane policies that flow from industry personnel at all levels who treat filmmaking as a political act. So basically we need "Black person: the Movie" to come out and make everyone angry, to show them they won't fricking die if something doesn't check off all their little politically correct boxes.
WHY do all these Hollywood people end up complaining about the soulless horror their industry has become but they still voluntarily participate in making these movies and shows
THAT’S WHAT THE MONEY IS FOR
>the shilling is back again
i'm all for it
No one shilled anything
>Audiences will always be able to sniff out bullshit.
Did she just forget that Avengers Endgame is the 2nd highest grossing film of all time?
>Even if films start to be made with AI, humans aren't going to fricking want to see those
Sure they will, she just doesn't want to lose her job
AI can definitely write something better than Madame Web, Dakota
It's not like she's ever been in something remotely noteworthy, let alone artistic.
She was in Don Johnson’s johnson, or half of her was
Hope this gets her blacklisted. Film is a pretty sacred industry. If she doesn't like the orthodoxy of it she needs to be made an example of.
I hear what all you guys are saying.
>all Dakota makes is shit movies
>she was one of the 300+ people who signed some Times Up pact
>she has a potty mouth
But what she's talking about is exactly something that Cinemaphile supports. But since it's her saying it, you disagree?
She put all her chips on black and it hit red. Now she's saying the whole game is rigged. She can frick off
Your anology spoke to me.
Yeah, I guess if Madame Webb was successful, she wouldn't be complaining about Hollywood. Kinda sus.
Didn't she say this while she was supposed to be promoting the movie?
Interview came out today. Seems like it was after the press tour. Either way what was she expecting?
bubble gum tongue for my cum to land on
>But what she's talking about is exactly something that Cinemaphile supports
>My feeling has been for a long time that audiences are extremely smart
Cinemaphile knows audiences are extremely stupid. What she's doing is gaslighting her fans into boycotting AI.
>Nepoc**t
If she got her tiddies out movie would have made ateast another $10 million.
>capeshit
>art