It’s because it’s not the US or UK that will melt first. If it was on our soil proper we would solve it relatively quick. It’s just not P1 in the western world so it doesn’t get solved.
>If TPTB really believed this was a problem
They don't, just like all environmental problems aren't a priority to governments. They just kick the can down the road and pretend to do something. Anyway nuclear isn't better for the environment.
It's not just politicians, it's climate activists too. If they thought this was a real problem they would advocate for nuclear instead of dicking around with solar panels >Anyway nuclear isn't better for the environment.
It's great for co2 emissions, though. If you think we are "going to melt" and "it's a genocide" and it isn't just rhetoric and exaggeration, then it's the obvious solution.
Make nuclear power plants and co2 emissions drop by 80% overnight, people switch to electric cars and electric stoves because they are vastly cheaper, without needing to coherce them through legislation.
Anyone who talks about climate change without advocating for nuclare is either grifting or in it for religious reasons.
Yeah instead of melting we will just have to harbor all of the fleeing refugees. Which isn't a problem for rich people as they can easily just avoid them
What do you mean? They are always here and I already have to deal with them everyday. Wishful thinking won't stop them from pursuing what is in their best interests despite ours
>If TPTB really believed this was a problem
They don't, just like all environmental problems aren't a priority to governments. They just kick the can down the road and pretend to do something. Anyway nuclear isn't better for the environment.
>Anyway nuclear isn't better for the environment.
Yeah you're right. Better make a ton of shitty solar panels that produce hundreds of times more waste than nuclear power plants and also have to be replaced in a couple decades.
We can prevent radioactive leaks if stored properly and it takes up hundreds of times less room. Enjoy your solar panels in the ocean. At least there will be car batteries to power them with.
>properly
That's the key word. The process of mining uranium, enriching it, using it, then storing the nuclear waste is wonderful if done properly. But people cut corners and frick up. And instead of a solar panel going to a landfill, it makes entire cities uninhabitable. We might as well try for nuclear fusion since it's more likely than "clean" nuclear fission.
Also global warming is a fact and your conspiracy theories don't make it less true.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Also global warming is a fact >Y-YOU ARE conspiracy theorist NOT ME YOU FRICKING CHUD NY AND LA ARE ALREADY UNDER WATER
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Also global warming is a fact and your conspiracy theories don't make it less true.
How is it a "fact"? What actual proof is there of it?
There is none, all we have proof of is that they are lying about it.
It is like covid. There was no way to know what was going on, but it became obvious very soon they were lying about it.
4 months ago
Anonymous
I like how the global warming goalposts have been constantly changing for decades now and yet you are still not clued in on the scam. What a chump you are.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Corrupt ass slavshit governments on the brink of collapse cut corners and frick up. And that doesn't just go for nuclear power.
This estimate doesn't take into consideration:
- breeder reactors that need 1/60th less uranium
- thorium reserves
- any uranium mine that isn't already in use
it's worse than estimates that fossil fuels would run out in the 70s, no 80s, no 90s, no 2000s, no 2010s...
protip: when their point is time-disassociated fractured hypnagogic and erratic panic on a massive scale permeating apocalyptic semiotics in nomos and logos they would absolutely not, as above so below or fresh blood gets the engine coughing but basically no one's fooled into new morning of desire as they say
Damn, someone should probably do something about this
Reminder that overseas shipping mega oil tankers that wal-mart, amazon toyota etc all use to import foreign goods made by cheap labor are the biggest emitters of pollution and the biggest consumers of oil on the planet.
You could instantly solve 90% of all global pollution and oil consumption by having your crap made in your own country
You would also be able to force corporations to follow enviromental laws by doing this.
lmao you don’t even know about them sending all their nuclear waste to Siberia. Meltdowns aren’t even the problem. Typical nuke shill doesn’t even know what they’re shilling for.
Nice strawman you're building. I never said I was an expert. I just don't deny common sense out of pure contrarianism because I want to be a special snowflake.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>doesn't deny common sense >denies human nature though
Tell me anon, if the science is settled, why aren't climatologists out of a job, and all the govt funding stopped because of the completion of their work settling the science?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Because the globe is still warming? God you are dense. >denies human nature though
If you're talking about bribery, corruption and misinformation, that's precisely why climate change hasn't been addressed
4 months ago
Anonymous
So... the science isn't settled then?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Can you seriously not differentiate the distinction between identifying a problem and solving one?
4 months ago
Anonymous
answer the question. its a yes or no response. pretty damn simple, shouldn't be hard to manage even for you
4 months ago
Anonymous
>If you're talking about bribery, corruption and misinformation, that's precisely why climate change hasn't been addressed
But we are all taught about it in school and billions are being spent on it.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Billions are also being spent to obstruct anything being done about it and perpetuating misinformation campaigns.
It's been awhile since I went to school but I don't remember climate change being mentioned once. When did they teach that segment? Social studies?
4 months ago
Anonymous
No they're not.
What "misinformation" have you encountered about global warming lately? Everywhere mainstream you hear nothing but the party line.
>It's been awhile since I went to school but I don't remember climate change being mentioned once. When did they teach that segment? Social studies?
Why would it be social studies. Are you seriously suggesting global warming isn't taught in school?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>What "misinformation" have you encountered about global warming lately?
Ever heard of this thing called a Republican? >Are you seriously suggesting global warming isn't taught in school?
Yes. I'm seriously suggesting that.
4 months ago
Anonymous
If global warming isn't pushed everywhere in the mainstream then why does every 85 IQ like
I live in CT and for Christmas Day it was like 65 degrees. I went outside with a jacket and had to take it off almost immediately. We haven't had 1 drop of snow this year when even 10 years ago it was like multiple blizzards by now.
This isn't normal.
have it immediately on hand to explain every weather phenomenon they encounter?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>if global warming is real then you must defend every person on the planet who agrees that it is real as well as everything they say
Uh no I don't
4 months ago
Anonymous
Look shithead every single moron on the planet now when they see the sun in january or when it rains extra in september says, as their first instinct GUESS IT'S MUH GLOBAL WARMING. Why? because it is what we are all taught in every corner of everywhere, especially IN SCHOOL (I can't believe you are seriously arguing global warming isn't taught in school)
This mysterious big oil brainwashing doesn't exist. It is the exact opposite. we are saturated with muh global warming climate change brainwashing from every direction.
4 months ago
Anonymous
It's hilarious to me that you cite idiots who have no idea how global warming works as evidence that global warming isn't real. I could just as easily cite every idiot who says "SO MUCH FOR GLOBAL WARMING AMIRITE?" everytime it's cold outside as evidence of the exact opposite.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>It's hilarious to me that you cite idiots who have no idea how global warming works as evidence that global warming isn't real.
That is obviously not what I'm doing. I'm citing them as evidence that "global warming" has been drilled into everyone's heads.
How did you fail to understand that?
Even your counteragrument supports this point - that 'muh global warming' has become the default cultural position.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Even your counteragrument supports this point - that 'muh global warming' has become the default cultural position.
You want to argue that someone denying climate change exists is somehow evidence that we've been indoctrinated to believe climate change exists?
4 months ago
Anonymous
4 months ago
Anonymous
Republicans aren't the ones spreading Misinformation about global warming
The mainstream media is.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Billions are also being spent to obstruct anything being done about it
Do you have an example?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Of course you're taught about it in school that's where the misinformation comes in. And the billions being spent that is where the bribery and corruption comes in
Nah instead let's take the word of massive soulless EPA dodging conglomerates like Halliburton and Dupont, their lobbyists, their "experts", and the politicians they've bribed
no shit sherlock? You also have a rushed "vaccine" that has 4 million reported adverse reactions in 3 years.
For reference, vaccines like Tetanus and Polio have had 150-170,000 reported adverse reactions in around 60 years
wtf is an adverse reaction? A rash? Scar tissue? who cares
4 months ago
Anonymous
you shouldn't legally be allowed to vote. Nor should any of your direct relatives and any offspring henceforth for the next 7 centuries.
4 months ago
Anonymous
ok and where in that paper does it say 4 million
4 months ago
Anonymous
>he actually thinks that a single study would list all 4 million >in its introduction of all places >and that 4 million isn't a cumulative total across a multitude of studies from schools of medicine across the world
4 months ago
Anonymous
So there's no evidence for that figure? You just pulled it out of your ass?
4 months ago
Anonymous
So basically the paper you cited as evidence doesn't actually prove a thing, glad we established that
>the paper is an example of the medical world documenting severe adverse cardiac affects from a vaccine rushed through by a collusion between government and multinational Pharmaceutical companies >meanwhile you two
BuT wHeRe Is ThE eViDeNcE
lol have a nice day you bootlicking scum
4 months ago
Anonymous
Are you sure that's what it is? Are you sure it isn't bullshit?
4 months ago
Anonymous
feel free to use your non-existent medical degree to disprove the _checks author notes_ 13 experienced medical professionals who conducted and produced the study. I'll wait
4 months ago
Anonymous
So basically the paper you cited as evidence doesn't actually prove a thing, glad we established that
4 months ago
Anonymous
>published online
*wheeze*
4 months ago
Anonymous
>TWO. MORE. WEEKS!!!!
you cant breed
4 months ago
Anonymous
>muh two weeks
Nah, more like two years ago. You can clearly see the jump in excess deaths post vax. Do note you don't see these jumps in non vaxxed countries.
I hope you've got your will in order.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>direct relatives and any offspring henceforth for the next 7 centuries
Seven centuries? Anyone of them alive today would be dead in one and thus would not be alive to reproduce in 700 years anyways.
4 months ago
Anonymous
More like Anaphylaxis, Thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndrome (TTS), Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Myopericarditis, Chest pain, Deep venous thrombosis, Pulmonary embolism, Bell’s palsy
Make sure to get your latest booster. Remember; safe and effective!
4 months ago
Anonymous
Myocarditis is totally normal and expected for kids your age don't worry about it. And don't even think about suing Pfizer or Moderna
4 months ago
Anonymous
>wtf is an adverse reaction?
Here is a 9 page list the courts forced Pfizer to release. Enjoy!
You're getting bad information, it's nowhere near 4 million
4 months ago
Anonymous
what number qualifies it as "100% safe and effective" in your mind? a million adverse reactions? 2 million?
4 months ago
Anonymous
What number of deaths qualifies Covid as "harmless"
4 months ago
Anonymous
i like that you cant answer my question, so you divert with an off-topic question. Really cements my victory in this argument.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>so you divert with an off-topic question
it's very much on topic
4 months ago
Anonymous
Nobody ever said it was 100% safe and effective. It's like 99.6% safe and effective. Adverse reactions do happen, but the vast majority of them are either mild or a pre-existing condition is involved. There are no guarantees in medical science. The fact that you think there are means you are a child. No vaccine, treatment, medication or therapy ever invented in the history of medicine has a 100% efficacy rate.
4 months ago
Anonymous
It has more severe VAERS events then every other vaccine combined.
4 months ago
Anonymous
No. It doesn't.
4 months ago
Anonymous
You just flatly and confidently assert wrong things over and over.
4 months ago
Anonymous
4 months ago
Anonymous
There are now 927,740 cases reported to VAERS following COVID-19 shots for the past 11 months, out of the total of 1,782,453 cases in the entire VAERS database filed for the past 30+ years, That means that 52% off ALL vaccine adverse reaction cases in VAERS for the past 30+ years have been reported in the last 11 months following the COVID-19 shots
4 months ago
Anonymous
you do know, we live in a hyper information age... right?
4 months ago
Anonymous
You do realize that "100% safe and effective" is not the same thing as "100% effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths?" I mean, of course you realize that. No one is that stupid.
4 months ago
Anonymous
its not the same as 85% affective either, or wait was it 73.6% affective... or no wait 100% again?
4 months ago
Anonymous
So you actually don't understand the difference. Man, that is sad.
4 months ago
Anonymous
How many more screen shots do you want me to post proving you're a liar?
4 months ago
Anonymous
How many screen shots do I want you to post to reiterate that you don't have a clue what you're talking about? Why, as many as you like.
4 months ago
Anonymous
You do realise that even mainstream media reported that the vax is more dangerous than covid itself for young boys?
4 months ago
Anonymous
You do realize that "mainstream media" is a wide array of different sources and they don't all share the exact same level of credibility?
4 months ago
Anonymous
No, I don't realize that. Why do they then all say the exact same things and get the exact same things wrong?
4 months ago
Anonymous
They don't, you're just wildly misinformed
4 months ago
Anonymous
The mainstream media agrees in lockstep with each other on every single issue, and changes like a school of fish in lockstep on every single issue when The Narrative changes, even when it is all completely wrong.
If I am "wildly misinformed" then give me a counterexample. Show me a mainstream source saying the Ukraine is losing from the last few years. They all said the Ukraine is winning even though it has obviously been losing for years. Or show me one saying the vax is dangerous over that same time scale. etc
You can't, because they all agree on the same lies at the same time. The mainstream media is a monolith - it is the state Department of Information. It doesn't tolerate dissent.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>The mainstream media agrees in lockstep with each other on every single issue
Here's the thing though. No it doesn't. >then show me one example of them reaffirming my nonsense back at me because the only way I find a source credible is if it tells me what I want to hear
Hey, even Fox News has standards.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Here's the thing though. No it doesn't.
Oh look, another confident assertion with no supporting argument.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Oh look, another pot calling the kettle black.
4 months ago
Anonymous
You say no it doesn't
Where is your proof.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Their models have constantly improved since they predicted a global ice age (that never happened) and they've improved even more than when they predicted global warming (that never happened) so these models that now say we need to live in pods and eat bugs or there will be... um... a cRiSiS... have to be right. And if you think that noticing decades and decades of failed predictions is a reason to doubt that the new models are correct, well then, you're just anti-science.
4 months ago
Anonymous
So how did the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN MSNBC, CBC, BBC report on the Hunter Biden Laptop story?
4 months ago
Anonymous
I loved how they all admitted the laptop was real two years after they previously said it was fake news. Absolute scum.
And morons like some people in this still take the news as fact... lol
4 months ago
Anonymous
I don’t give them any credibility. You just seem like a man who needs to see a BBC article before you can accept something
4 months ago
Anonymous
I give them more credibility than I give you, that's for sure.
4 months ago
Anonymous
NTA but that's a meaningless statement and it shows you think they lack credibility. You set the bar at "more reliable than an anonymous shitpost" for a reason.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Honestly that's not really true. Corporate media is extremely incestuous and every major network has loads of the same investors, production economy (hiring the same third party supporting businesses) and the same small coquette of retired US officials.
MSNBC, FOX, CNN are filthy with Pentagon 'retirees'.
You can't just leave one for refusing to run a story and go to the other. It doesn't work like some cheesy 90s movie. It's a small world with very tight controls.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>thinking cable television news is relevant in 2023
this board was being overrun with facebook boomers
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Literally copy paste the same Rueters dispatches
Nah it's one beast. Anyone who was allowed to embed with troops in Iraq have as much credibility as gaming journalists about some new EA game while being given free flights and hotels and swag from convention girls.
Or pajeet doctors and prescribing opioid.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Nobody ever said it was 100% safe and effective. It's like 99.6% safe and effective.
Then why didn't they just say it's 99.6% safe and effective
4 months ago
Anonymous
If it's 99.6% effective that would mean if you 1000 people who got Vaccinated, 996 would be healthy and only 4 would have caught covid.
Do you think only 0.4% of people who got vaccinated eventually caught covid?
Do you really believe the vaccines were that effective 2 years after the fact?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Oh ok I guess I will just take your word because your track record is so good on everything else, in terms of accuracy, integrity, and overall sanity in relation to the real world.
I seem to remember it going on for months and months and doing nothing to stop the spread of covid
Remember people getting in trouble for walking on the beach by themselves and stuff
Normies permanently jumped the shark in 2020
4 months ago
Anonymous
Covid was very smart. It didn't go to BLM terror events
4 months ago
Anonymous
Trump rallies with less than 100 people: unsafe.
BLM crowds with tens of thousands: completely safe
Do not question the science, chud. Our brightest and best doctors agree.
The reason it took so much longer is because of idiots like you who couldn't get with the program, I'm certainly going to give them more credit than I give you
Uh, no? Mask mandates have been lifted where I live for like two years.
4 months ago
Anonymous
bruh cringe af. You're at least carrying hand sanitizer around still right??
4 months ago
Anonymous
So you only wore a mask because it was mandated and you don't care about stopping the spread?
Would you kill your own grandma if the mandate that made murdering old people illegal lapsed?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>you don't care about stopping the spread?
The masks never once stopped it from spreading moron. Even Fouchi said this at the beginning of the bullshit
4 months ago
Anonymous
Sorry Chud. But Fauci admitted that was a lie. And you know he is telling the truth because he never lies.
>The flu vanished that year due to successful social distancing and mask wearing >Covid didn't go away because idiots like you refused to social distance and wear masks.
... you... you realize not all viruses are the same, right?
4 months ago
Anonymous
NTA but yes they all share the same rising and lowering tides seasonally.
Also you type like a performative homosexual. It has a big impact on how people perceive you. I'm not even trying to be a disk it's just good to keep in mind. Emotive "....you.." shit is repulsive to many people.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>share the same rising and lowering tides seasonally
yeah but WHY do they wax and wane? >blah blah
good one.
4 months ago
Anonymous
They wax and wane with seasons, weather, and gathering events.
Covid in the first few weeks in North America started with rich israelites in airports
4 months ago
Anonymous
>wax and wane with seasons/weather
that's the same thing. >gathering
wow, look at that. when people are nearby one another then there is an increase in contagious diseases being spread. how strange.
what could be some reasons why influenza cases were virtually wiped out but covid persisted? does anything come to mind?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>that's the same thing
No it isn't.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>being this pedantic
the only reason the seasons are noteworthy is because they signify a shift in expected weather. further, the congregation of people is what's important in regards to disease spread which is facilitated by certain types of weather, the seasons themselves don't matter. the previous post was trying to fill a wordcount and give off an illusion of understanding by 1) saying the same thing twice and B) listing inconsequential things.
again, why would covid persist while influenza didn't?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Fair. >why would covid persist while influenza didn't
I don't know. You tell us.
Name one country on earth that stopped the virus.
You science worshipers are nothing of the sort, you are a death cult. Go take your 19th booster and frick off.
All you have to do is look at Sweden that didn't fair any different than its lockdown neighbors.
Covid morons will just deny, deny, deny. They cannot accept they were conned. Much easier to cope and lie to themselves.
I live in CT and for Christmas Day it was like 65 degrees. I went outside with a jacket and had to take it off almost immediately. We haven't had 1 drop of snow this year when even 10 years ago it was like multiple blizzards by now.
>the weather changing isn't normal >the planet and nature is just one static, 100% predictable entity that has sat in one place never changing for billions of years
>we need to stop eating beef so we don't have cows producing green house has >Yes I live in millions dollars 10+ rooms house in where it snows your point?
climate change devotees are just a branch of modern atheism. they praise "the science." despitr having no love of science aside from what it tels then is good or bad.
the government is their savior, save for the republicans whome they view as their satan, and the ones who seek the downfall that is the good of their progressive ultragay shit liberal, dem, commie. whatever lefist drivel.
their method of redemption is to be on the right side of history, to be seen as one of the good one generations from now.
and much like modern atheism, they are en mass, but they are alone. they have no community. no friends, no loved ones, as the modern atheist can not love someone, or something more than he loves himself. a wholy egotistical and narcissistic creature; devoid of joy except that which he may deprave of others.
An Inconvenient Truth is a particularly egregious one because the movie came out in 2006 and made numerous very specific "within ten years" predictions, i.e. they were falsified by 2016
>By the year 2016:
>1: Mount Kilimanjaro will no longer have snow at its peak >2: The Arctic will no longer have ice >3: There will be a worse heat wave in Europe than the one in 2003 that killed 70,000 people >4: There will be a worse hurricane in the Gulf Coast than Katrina
>You have to accept a lower standard of living, goys. >NOOOOO WE CAN'T STOP MANUFACTURING IN CHINA BECAUSE WE JUST CAN'T OKAY!?
Globohomosexual environmentalism's bullshit is too transparent.
Would a lot more people take all these claims and the environment more serious if the preachers themselves didn't live in 100m mansions with 50 rooms and fly private jets everywhere?
Believe it or not, but the average person is not as stupid as everything thinks, people actually DO notice when stuff happens like when they hold "important" environment meetings in Dubai and have nearly everyone getting there with private jets that something is not right.
there was a bizarre trend right around when this movie came out of liberal politicians buying eight figure coastal mansions (i.e. ones they themselves allegedly believed would be underwater within a decade)
pic related, look at that fricking hungry ocean right there, imagine how dead he is in the slightest inevitable sea level rise
there was a bizarre trend right around when this movie came out of liberal politicians buying eight figure coastal mansions (i.e. ones they themselves allegedly believed would be underwater within a decade)
pic related, look at that fricking hungry ocean right there, imagine how dead he is in the slightest inevitable sea level rise
So all it would take for you to believe climate change is real is for elites to no longer buying waterfront property for millions of dollar and ZOOMing into climate conferences instead of flying a private jet?
if the christians say, we're going to heaven when we die, and then they willingly sacrifice themselves by refusing to convert and choosing to die, that makes their crazy bullshit seem a lot more convincing than if threatening them with death made them immediately disavow their religion
if someone say climate change is real but they can't even be bothered to PRETEND they think it is, why should anyone believe them? and why would anyone who did believe it accept the aid of these obvious liars who actively sabotage their efforts by claiming to support them while obviously actively not supporting them? everything about this shit is almost designed to make nobody believe it
it's be pretty epic if you showed this in schools all around the world and instilled a very real fear of death into children. that would be some serious epic style trolling. jokes aside, fireballs will be shooting from the sky and the seas will be boiling by the year 2020.
If your politicians speak about 'moving away from oil' then they do so because they hold stocks in chinese owned corporations you naive cuck.
Hope you don't complain about energy bill lately.
4 months ago
Anonymous
I might invest in some Chinese renewable companies as well
4 months ago
Anonymous
You should because people in charge will keep pushing this ineffectual shit and make us pay for it.
In my coutry the 30% of energy bill already goes for the fricking renewables, even though we have enough nuclear power plants to make it almost for free. Where does that nuclear energy goes? Oh right, to fricking Germany which closed theirs down after the pressure from watermelons.
>moving away from oil, which is happening
oil consumption was briefly dented when the entire world shut down and will hit the record high again this year, and next year
China and India don't give a frick and thanks to israelites, China is an energy hungry industrial powerhouse that's been two weeks away from collapse since the 70s.
It really hurts that the scientific institutions have no credibility left because they do too many Lysenkoisms for ZOG.
Am I supposed to trust the credibility and brave scientific rigor of a place that says race isn't real, or that men can become women? If they already knowingly lie about obvious things, how can I trust them over vague and ill defined things?
How come climate change people are the most fanatic about bringing as many people to first world countries as possible?
If you don't want to stop the immigration complex and get a handle on global trade (shipping emissions are always left out for some mysterious reason) then I can't believe that you believe climate change is a serious problem. You're just a moron or a liar.
this thread proves Cinemaphile is one of the stupidest boards on the chan. even if you were to be extremely charitable and say it's because of /misc/ losing containment, this is still full-moron levels of moronicness.
It's not because of /misc/. It happened everywhere. Every site.
morons stuck in the past think /misc/ is anything other than a humanless bot farm. Or that "/pol/" views like political racism somehow originate from there. Zoomers who say /misc/ things don't even know it exists.
It's frustrating seeing so many people not get this. /misc/ doesn't own anything. It doesn't originate anything. Nobody posts anyting there first.
I always just thought the whole thing was about trying to hurt Israel's Middle East enemies and to create a massive cap and trade ponzi scheme for rich Wallstreet israelites to further parasite off of productivity.
Because none of the actions around the issue make any sense at all if you take it at face value.
I'm Al Gore and I say that the world is going to end in 5 years, thank you for your attention and buy my book ''How I Made Money Losing An Election And Brainwashed Generations Of People Because Of it''
>global warming means record low temperatures >we're entering an extremely dry period with expected torrential rainfall >hottest ice age is upon us
nobody believed him, right?
We have been.
If TPTB really believed this was a problem we'd start builiding nuclear plants and "co2 emissions" would be solved in the space of 5 years.
It’s because it’s not the US or UK that will melt first. If it was on our soil proper we would solve it relatively quick. It’s just not P1 in the western world so it doesn’t get solved.
It's not just politicians, it's climate activists too. If they thought this was a real problem they would advocate for nuclear instead of dicking around with solar panels
>Anyway nuclear isn't better for the environment.
It's great for co2 emissions, though. If you think we are "going to melt" and "it's a genocide" and it isn't just rhetoric and exaggeration, then it's the obvious solution.
Make nuclear power plants and co2 emissions drop by 80% overnight, people switch to electric cars and electric stoves because they are vastly cheaper, without needing to coherce them through legislation.
Anyone who talks about climate change without advocating for nuclare is either grifting or in it for religious reasons.
Nuclear sucks
It is though you idiot. The coasts of both are heavily populated.
Yeah instead of melting we will just have to harbor all of the fleeing refugees. Which isn't a problem for rich people as they can easily just avoid them
We don't have to do anything. Frick the refugees.
What do you mean? They are always here and I already have to deal with them everyday. Wishful thinking won't stop them from pursuing what is in their best interests despite ours
We have to stop them and the israelites bringing them over.
They won't leave your family alone just because you do.
>If TPTB really believed this was a problem
They don't, just like all environmental problems aren't a priority to governments. They just kick the can down the road and pretend to do something. Anyway nuclear isn't better for the environment.
>Anyway nuclear isn't better for the environment.
Based moron. It's the best option we got right now.
>Anyway nuclear isn't better for the environment.
Yeah you're right. Better make a ton of shitty solar panels that produce hundreds of times more waste than nuclear power plants and also have to be replaced in a couple decades.
>produce hundreds of times more waste than nuclear power plants
Radioactive waste?
We can prevent radioactive leaks if stored properly and it takes up hundreds of times less room. Enjoy your solar panels in the ocean. At least there will be car batteries to power them with.
>properly
That's the key word. The process of mining uranium, enriching it, using it, then storing the nuclear waste is wonderful if done properly. But people cut corners and frick up. And instead of a solar panel going to a landfill, it makes entire cities uninhabitable. We might as well try for nuclear fusion since it's more likely than "clean" nuclear fission.
Also global warming is a fact and your conspiracy theories don't make it less true.
>Also global warming is a fact
>Y-YOU ARE conspiracy theorist NOT ME YOU FRICKING CHUD NY AND LA ARE ALREADY UNDER WATER
>Also global warming is a fact and your conspiracy theories don't make it less true.
How is it a "fact"? What actual proof is there of it?
There is none, all we have proof of is that they are lying about it.
It is like covid. There was no way to know what was going on, but it became obvious very soon they were lying about it.
I like how the global warming goalposts have been constantly changing for decades now and yet you are still not clued in on the scam. What a chump you are.
Corrupt ass slavshit governments on the brink of collapse cut corners and frick up. And that doesn't just go for nuclear power.
Throw the waste into breeder reactors dingus
there isn't enough uranium out there to fully go nuclear
There's enough uranium to last us for thousands of years.
yes on current uranium consumption, not if we switch to 100% nuclear
This is true only if you just consider uranium mines that are currently being exploited. We have plenty of uranium that we are not mining.
Theirs enough usable uranium to last around 20 years if most countries switched.
That's great news because oil peaked back in 70s. We are saved!
This estimate doesn't take into consideration:
- breeder reactors that need 1/60th less uranium
- thorium reserves
- any uranium mine that isn't already in use
it's worse than estimates that fossil fuels would run out in the 70s, no 80s, no 90s, no 2000s, no 2010s...
protip: when their point is time-disassociated fractured hypnagogic and erratic panic on a massive scale permeating apocalyptic semiotics in nomos and logos they would absolutely not, as above so below or fresh blood gets the engine coughing but basically no one's fooled into new morning of desire as they say
Reminder that overseas shipping mega oil tankers that wal-mart, amazon toyota etc all use to import foreign goods made by cheap labor are the biggest emitters of pollution and the biggest consumers of oil on the planet.
You could instantly solve 90% of all global pollution and oil consumption by having your crap made in your own country
You would also be able to force corporations to follow enviromental laws by doing this.
But how will I be able to afford a new iPhone every year? Get real, Chud.
You're unironically talking like a fascist right now.
shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, that truth is toooo inconvenient.
>nuke shill
lmao moron
There are 56 nuclear reactors in France. How many incidents have you heard of?
lmao you don’t even know about them sending all their nuclear waste to Siberia. Meltdowns aren’t even the problem. Typical nuke shill doesn’t even know what they’re shilling for.
>Meltdowns aren’t even the problem
But you're having one right now
>Sky angry
>pay more taxes to already rich politicians!
Climate change psychos are modern day charlatans
>Sky angry
You're confusing climate change with literally every religion ever
I fail to see the distinction
That's because you're mentally moronic
should be pretty easy for you to explain then. Seeing as how you're intricately versed on the topic that you clearly view yourself as an expert
Nice strawman you're building. I never said I was an expert. I just don't deny common sense out of pure contrarianism because I want to be a special snowflake.
>doesn't deny common sense
>denies human nature though
Tell me anon, if the science is settled, why aren't climatologists out of a job, and all the govt funding stopped because of the completion of their work settling the science?
Because the globe is still warming? God you are dense.
>denies human nature though
If you're talking about bribery, corruption and misinformation, that's precisely why climate change hasn't been addressed
So... the science isn't settled then?
Can you seriously not differentiate the distinction between identifying a problem and solving one?
answer the question. its a yes or no response. pretty damn simple, shouldn't be hard to manage even for you
>If you're talking about bribery, corruption and misinformation, that's precisely why climate change hasn't been addressed
But we are all taught about it in school and billions are being spent on it.
Billions are also being spent to obstruct anything being done about it and perpetuating misinformation campaigns.
It's been awhile since I went to school but I don't remember climate change being mentioned once. When did they teach that segment? Social studies?
No they're not.
What "misinformation" have you encountered about global warming lately? Everywhere mainstream you hear nothing but the party line.
>It's been awhile since I went to school but I don't remember climate change being mentioned once. When did they teach that segment? Social studies?
Why would it be social studies. Are you seriously suggesting global warming isn't taught in school?
>What "misinformation" have you encountered about global warming lately?
Ever heard of this thing called a Republican?
>Are you seriously suggesting global warming isn't taught in school?
Yes. I'm seriously suggesting that.
If global warming isn't pushed everywhere in the mainstream then why does every 85 IQ like
have it immediately on hand to explain every weather phenomenon they encounter?
>if global warming is real then you must defend every person on the planet who agrees that it is real as well as everything they say
Uh no I don't
Look shithead every single moron on the planet now when they see the sun in january or when it rains extra in september says, as their first instinct GUESS IT'S MUH GLOBAL WARMING. Why? because it is what we are all taught in every corner of everywhere, especially IN SCHOOL (I can't believe you are seriously arguing global warming isn't taught in school)
This mysterious big oil brainwashing doesn't exist. It is the exact opposite. we are saturated with muh global warming climate change brainwashing from every direction.
It's hilarious to me that you cite idiots who have no idea how global warming works as evidence that global warming isn't real. I could just as easily cite every idiot who says "SO MUCH FOR GLOBAL WARMING AMIRITE?" everytime it's cold outside as evidence of the exact opposite.
>It's hilarious to me that you cite idiots who have no idea how global warming works as evidence that global warming isn't real.
That is obviously not what I'm doing. I'm citing them as evidence that "global warming" has been drilled into everyone's heads.
How did you fail to understand that?
Even your counteragrument supports this point - that 'muh global warming' has become the default cultural position.
>Even your counteragrument supports this point - that 'muh global warming' has become the default cultural position.
You want to argue that someone denying climate change exists is somehow evidence that we've been indoctrinated to believe climate change exists?
Republicans aren't the ones spreading Misinformation about global warming
The mainstream media is.
>Billions are also being spent to obstruct anything being done about it
Do you have an example?
Of course you're taught about it in school that's where the misinformation comes in. And the billions being spent that is where the bribery and corruption comes in
Nah instead let's take the word of massive soulless EPA dodging conglomerates like Halliburton and Dupont, their lobbyists, their "experts", and the politicians they've bribed
are like the "experts" that gave us '14 days to flatten the curve'?
The curve did flatten though
no shit sherlock? You also have a rushed "vaccine" that has 4 million reported adverse reactions in 3 years.
For reference, vaccines like Tetanus and Polio have had 150-170,000 reported adverse reactions in around 60 years
wtf is an adverse reaction? A rash? Scar tissue? who cares
you shouldn't legally be allowed to vote. Nor should any of your direct relatives and any offspring henceforth for the next 7 centuries.
ok and where in that paper does it say 4 million
>he actually thinks that a single study would list all 4 million
>in its introduction of all places
>and that 4 million isn't a cumulative total across a multitude of studies from schools of medicine across the world
So there's no evidence for that figure? You just pulled it out of your ass?
>the paper is an example of the medical world documenting severe adverse cardiac affects from a vaccine rushed through by a collusion between government and multinational Pharmaceutical companies
>meanwhile you two
BuT wHeRe Is ThE eViDeNcE
lol have a nice day you bootlicking scum
Are you sure that's what it is? Are you sure it isn't bullshit?
feel free to use your non-existent medical degree to disprove the _checks author notes_ 13 experienced medical professionals who conducted and produced the study. I'll wait
So basically the paper you cited as evidence doesn't actually prove a thing, glad we established that
>published online
*wheeze*
>TWO. MORE. WEEKS!!!!
you cant breed
>muh two weeks
Nah, more like two years ago. You can clearly see the jump in excess deaths post vax. Do note you don't see these jumps in non vaxxed countries.
I hope you've got your will in order.
>direct relatives and any offspring henceforth for the next 7 centuries
Seven centuries? Anyone of them alive today would be dead in one and thus would not be alive to reproduce in 700 years anyways.
More like Anaphylaxis, Thrombosis with thrombocytopaenia syndrome (TTS), Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Myopericarditis, Chest pain, Deep venous thrombosis, Pulmonary embolism, Bell’s palsy
Make sure to get your latest booster. Remember; safe and effective!
Myocarditis is totally normal and expected for kids your age don't worry about it. And don't even think about suing Pfizer or Moderna
>wtf is an adverse reaction?
Here is a 9 page list the courts forced Pfizer to release. Enjoy!
You're getting bad information, it's nowhere near 4 million
what number qualifies it as "100% safe and effective" in your mind? a million adverse reactions? 2 million?
What number of deaths qualifies Covid as "harmless"
i like that you cant answer my question, so you divert with an off-topic question. Really cements my victory in this argument.
>so you divert with an off-topic question
it's very much on topic
Nobody ever said it was 100% safe and effective. It's like 99.6% safe and effective. Adverse reactions do happen, but the vast majority of them are either mild or a pre-existing condition is involved. There are no guarantees in medical science. The fact that you think there are means you are a child. No vaccine, treatment, medication or therapy ever invented in the history of medicine has a 100% efficacy rate.
It has more severe VAERS events then every other vaccine combined.
No. It doesn't.
You just flatly and confidently assert wrong things over and over.
There are now 927,740 cases reported to VAERS following COVID-19 shots for the past 11 months, out of the total of 1,782,453 cases in the entire VAERS database filed for the past 30+ years, That means that 52% off ALL vaccine adverse reaction cases in VAERS for the past 30+ years have been reported in the last 11 months following the COVID-19 shots
you do know, we live in a hyper information age... right?
You do realize that "100% safe and effective" is not the same thing as "100% effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths?" I mean, of course you realize that. No one is that stupid.
its not the same as 85% affective either, or wait was it 73.6% affective... or no wait 100% again?
So you actually don't understand the difference. Man, that is sad.
How many more screen shots do you want me to post proving you're a liar?
How many screen shots do I want you to post to reiterate that you don't have a clue what you're talking about? Why, as many as you like.
You do realise that even mainstream media reported that the vax is more dangerous than covid itself for young boys?
You do realize that "mainstream media" is a wide array of different sources and they don't all share the exact same level of credibility?
No, I don't realize that. Why do they then all say the exact same things and get the exact same things wrong?
They don't, you're just wildly misinformed
The mainstream media agrees in lockstep with each other on every single issue, and changes like a school of fish in lockstep on every single issue when The Narrative changes, even when it is all completely wrong.
If I am "wildly misinformed" then give me a counterexample. Show me a mainstream source saying the Ukraine is losing from the last few years. They all said the Ukraine is winning even though it has obviously been losing for years. Or show me one saying the vax is dangerous over that same time scale. etc
You can't, because they all agree on the same lies at the same time. The mainstream media is a monolith - it is the state Department of Information. It doesn't tolerate dissent.
>The mainstream media agrees in lockstep with each other on every single issue
Here's the thing though. No it doesn't.
>then show me one example of them reaffirming my nonsense back at me because the only way I find a source credible is if it tells me what I want to hear
Hey, even Fox News has standards.
>Here's the thing though. No it doesn't.
Oh look, another confident assertion with no supporting argument.
Oh look, another pot calling the kettle black.
You say no it doesn't
Where is your proof.
Their models have constantly improved since they predicted a global ice age (that never happened) and they've improved even more than when they predicted global warming (that never happened) so these models that now say we need to live in pods and eat bugs or there will be... um... a cRiSiS... have to be right. And if you think that noticing decades and decades of failed predictions is a reason to doubt that the new models are correct, well then, you're just anti-science.
So how did the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN MSNBC, CBC, BBC report on the Hunter Biden Laptop story?
I loved how they all admitted the laptop was real two years after they previously said it was fake news. Absolute scum.
And morons like some people in this still take the news as fact... lol
I don’t give them any credibility. You just seem like a man who needs to see a BBC article before you can accept something
I give them more credibility than I give you, that's for sure.
NTA but that's a meaningless statement and it shows you think they lack credibility. You set the bar at "more reliable than an anonymous shitpost" for a reason.
Honestly that's not really true. Corporate media is extremely incestuous and every major network has loads of the same investors, production economy (hiring the same third party supporting businesses) and the same small coquette of retired US officials.
MSNBC, FOX, CNN are filthy with Pentagon 'retirees'.
You can't just leave one for refusing to run a story and go to the other. It doesn't work like some cheesy 90s movie. It's a small world with very tight controls.
>thinking cable television news is relevant in 2023
this board was being overrun with facebook boomers
>Literally copy paste the same Rueters dispatches
Nah it's one beast. Anyone who was allowed to embed with troops in Iraq have as much credibility as gaming journalists about some new EA game while being given free flights and hotels and swag from convention girls.
Or pajeet doctors and prescribing opioid.
>Nobody ever said it was 100% safe and effective. It's like 99.6% safe and effective.
Then why didn't they just say it's 99.6% safe and effective
If it's 99.6% effective that would mean if you 1000 people who got Vaccinated, 996 would be healthy and only 4 would have caught covid.
Do you think only 0.4% of people who got vaccinated eventually caught covid?
Do you really believe the vaccines were that effective 2 years after the fact?
Oh ok I guess I will just take your word because your track record is so good on everything else, in terms of accuracy, integrity, and overall sanity in relation to the real world.
>real world = shit i read on facebook
Nice strawman you're building there.
So what happened after those 14 days ended?
Life went back to normal?
I seem to remember it going on for months and months and doing nothing to stop the spread of covid
Remember people getting in trouble for walking on the beach by themselves and stuff
Normies permanently jumped the shark in 2020
Covid was very smart. It didn't go to BLM terror events
Trump rallies with less than 100 people: unsafe.
BLM crowds with tens of thousands: completely safe
Do not question the science, chud. Our brightest and best doctors agree.
The reason it took so much longer is because of idiots like you who couldn't get with the program, I'm certainly going to give them more credit than I give you
Based chad right here. You still double masking my homie?
Uh, no? Mask mandates have been lifted where I live for like two years.
bruh cringe af. You're at least carrying hand sanitizer around still right??
So you only wore a mask because it was mandated and you don't care about stopping the spread?
Would you kill your own grandma if the mandate that made murdering old people illegal lapsed?
>you don't care about stopping the spread?
The masks never once stopped it from spreading moron. Even Fouchi said this at the beginning of the bullshit
Sorry Chud. But Fauci admitted that was a lie. And you know he is telling the truth because he never lies.
>The flu vanished that year due to successful social distancing and mask wearing
>Covid didn't go away because idiots like you refused to social distance and wear masks.
... you... you realize not all viruses are the same, right?
NTA but yes they all share the same rising and lowering tides seasonally.
Also you type like a performative homosexual. It has a big impact on how people perceive you. I'm not even trying to be a disk it's just good to keep in mind. Emotive "....you.." shit is repulsive to many people.
>share the same rising and lowering tides seasonally
yeah but WHY do they wax and wane?
>blah blah
good one.
They wax and wane with seasons, weather, and gathering events.
Covid in the first few weeks in North America started with rich israelites in airports
>wax and wane with seasons/weather
that's the same thing.
>gathering
wow, look at that. when people are nearby one another then there is an increase in contagious diseases being spread. how strange.
what could be some reasons why influenza cases were virtually wiped out but covid persisted? does anything come to mind?
>that's the same thing
No it isn't.
>being this pedantic
the only reason the seasons are noteworthy is because they signify a shift in expected weather. further, the congregation of people is what's important in regards to disease spread which is facilitated by certain types of weather, the seasons themselves don't matter. the previous post was trying to fill a wordcount and give off an illusion of understanding by 1) saying the same thing twice and B) listing inconsequential things.
again, why would covid persist while influenza didn't?
Fair.
>why would covid persist while influenza didn't
I don't know. You tell us.
Name one country on earth that stopped the virus.
You science worshipers are nothing of the sort, you are a death cult. Go take your 19th booster and frick off.
They hate science adthe scientific method. They worship institutions as a way to leech off their (radically slipping) legitimacy.
You cannot keep doubling down and saying your own policy mistakes were caused by the other side not listening to you enough
All you have to do is look at Sweden that didn't fair any different than its lockdown neighbors.
Covid morons will just deny, deny, deny. They cannot accept they were conned. Much easier to cope and lie to themselves.
Like the Inflation reduction act?
shut up chud, you can solve a problem caused by printing too much money by.... printing more money!
Being taken to see this in school when I was like 7 was my first heavy hit of indoctrinarion. Fell for that shit for a long time afterwards
>we all died in 2017
>meanwhile, Gore is worth low nine figure$
I live in CT and for Christmas Day it was like 65 degrees. I went outside with a jacket and had to take it off almost immediately. We haven't had 1 drop of snow this year when even 10 years ago it was like multiple blizzards by now.
This isn't normal.
>the weather changing isn't normal
>the planet and nature is just one static, 100% predictable entity that has sat in one place never changing for billions of years
>billions of years
Do you live on the timescale of billions of years?
>we need to stop eating beef so we don't have cows producing green house has
>Yes I live in millions dollars 10+ rooms house in where it snows your point?
ESL or just stupid?
Leftist morons predicting global warming are just like Jehovahs Witnesses predicting Armageddon.
Gullible. Morons.
I like drawing attention to the fact that climate cultists and Harold Camping have the same number of correct predictions.
climate change devotees are just a branch of modern atheism. they praise "the science." despitr having no love of science aside from what it tels then is good or bad.
the government is their savior, save for the republicans whome they view as their satan, and the ones who seek the downfall that is the good of their progressive ultragay shit liberal, dem, commie. whatever lefist drivel.
their method of redemption is to be on the right side of history, to be seen as one of the good one generations from now.
and much like modern atheism, they are en mass, but they are alone. they have no community. no friends, no loved ones, as the modern atheist can not love someone, or something more than he loves himself. a wholy egotistical and narcissistic creature; devoid of joy except that which he may deprave of others.
Did you know that in 2010 the North Pole will be completely navigable?
An Inconvenient Truth is a particularly egregious one because the movie came out in 2006 and made numerous very specific "within ten years" predictions, i.e. they were falsified by 2016
>By the year 2016:
>1: Mount Kilimanjaro will no longer have snow at its peak
>2: The Arctic will no longer have ice
>3: There will be a worse heat wave in Europe than the one in 2003 that killed 70,000 people
>4: There will be a worse hurricane in the Gulf Coast than Katrina
Did any of that stuff happen?
to be fair, there was that 250 mph typhoon that ran across mexico.
Other than that frick climate cucks.
>You have to accept a lower standard of living, goys.
>NOOOOO WE CAN'T STOP MANUFACTURING IN CHINA BECAUSE WE JUST CAN'T OKAY!?
Globohomosexual environmentalism's bullshit is too transparent.
If you want to know why people actually hate environmentalists I've got an answer for you
Would a lot more people take all these claims and the environment more serious if the preachers themselves didn't live in 100m mansions with 50 rooms and fly private jets everywhere?
Believe it or not, but the average person is not as stupid as everything thinks, people actually DO notice when stuff happens like when they hold "important" environment meetings in Dubai and have nearly everyone getting there with private jets that something is not right.
there was a bizarre trend right around when this movie came out of liberal politicians buying eight figure coastal mansions (i.e. ones they themselves allegedly believed would be underwater within a decade)
pic related, look at that fricking hungry ocean right there, imagine how dead he is in the slightest inevitable sea level rise
So all it would take for you to believe climate change is real is for elites to no longer buying waterfront property for millions of dollar and ZOOMing into climate conferences instead of flying a private jet?
if the christians say, we're going to heaven when we die, and then they willingly sacrifice themselves by refusing to convert and choosing to die, that makes their crazy bullshit seem a lot more convincing than if threatening them with death made them immediately disavow their religion
if someone say climate change is real but they can't even be bothered to PRETEND they think it is, why should anyone believe them? and why would anyone who did believe it accept the aid of these obvious liars who actively sabotage their efforts by claiming to support them while obviously actively not supporting them? everything about this shit is almost designed to make nobody believe it
it's be pretty epic if you showed this in schools all around the world and instilled a very real fear of death into children. that would be some serious epic style trolling. jokes aside, fireballs will be shooting from the sky and the seas will be boiling by the year 2020.
Why does /misc/ willingly shill for OPEC?
Nothing harmed OPEC more than widening North American drilling operations and nothing benefits them more than shutting those rigs down
And nothing will hurt them more than moving away from oil, which is happening. They can stay profitable longer than NA can
>moving away from oil
Actual fricking moron.
Already happening, brownanon
If your politicians speak about 'moving away from oil' then they do so because they hold stocks in chinese owned corporations you naive cuck.
Hope you don't complain about energy bill lately.
I might invest in some Chinese renewable companies as well
You should because people in charge will keep pushing this ineffectual shit and make us pay for it.
In my coutry the 30% of energy bill already goes for the fricking renewables, even though we have enough nuclear power plants to make it almost for free. Where does that nuclear energy goes? Oh right, to fricking Germany which closed theirs down after the pressure from watermelons.
>moving away from oil, which is happening
oil consumption was briefly dented when the entire world shut down and will hit the record high again this year, and next year
>anon can't identify the stagnation of an uptrend
holy.
China and India don't give a frick and thanks to israelites, China is an energy hungry industrial powerhouse that's been two weeks away from collapse since the 70s.
Why do left wingers willingly shill for Chinese Solar?
Al Gore was right all along. His only mistake was the timing.
The only thing you could do is to expand your Consciousness.
It really hurts that the scientific institutions have no credibility left because they do too many Lysenkoisms for ZOG.
Am I supposed to trust the credibility and brave scientific rigor of a place that says race isn't real, or that men can become women? If they already knowingly lie about obvious things, how can I trust them over vague and ill defined things?
*sigh* somehow the environment is saved
why don't they just build it from recyclable material
Why don't they just mine the copper with battery powered machines instead of diesel?
Because it won't last. Even made out of carbon and glass fibre it only lasts few years, the tensions are incredible.
... but thats the point, you just melt it down and make a new one.
just make it from diamonds
>water vapour is le scary! there's a lot of it!
How come climate change people are the most fanatic about bringing as many people to first world countries as possible?
If you don't want to stop the immigration complex and get a handle on global trade (shipping emissions are always left out for some mysterious reason) then I can't believe that you believe climate change is a serious problem. You're just a moron or a liar.
this thread proves Cinemaphile is one of the stupidest boards on the chan. even if you were to be extremely charitable and say it's because of /misc/ losing containment, this is still full-moron levels of moronicness.
>no argument
ok midwit
It is because of /misc/ though. Go back to around 2016 and Cinemaphile wasn't like this.
It's not because of /misc/. It happened everywhere. Every site.
morons stuck in the past think /misc/ is anything other than a humanless bot farm. Or that "/pol/" views like political racism somehow originate from there. Zoomers who say /misc/ things don't even know it exists.
It's frustrating seeing so many people not get this. /misc/ doesn't own anything. It doesn't originate anything. Nobody posts anyting there first.
>It happened everywhere. Every site.
It certainly isn't a reaction to leftists and their corporations pushing their insane conspiracy theories everywhere, no xir.
That's part of what I mean. People are blind to product and corporate moves.
"The incident begins when you react" is liberal corporate homosexual aggression to a T.
>I WILL
this post made an entire dogshit thread worthwhile, thanks anon
>there will be no more snow on Mount Kilimanjaro by 2016
oh boy, this didn't age well
It's ok they just adjust the models to fit with their agenda
I always just thought the whole thing was about trying to hurt Israel's Middle East enemies and to create a massive cap and trade ponzi scheme for rich Wallstreet israelites to further parasite off of productivity.
Because none of the actions around the issue make any sense at all if you take it at face value.
What was that one documentary that showed how every “green” solution was inefficient and still used shit tons of fossil fuels anyway?
The ice caps are gonna heckin MELT in 5 years
Dude the water is gonna melt in TEN years and then Goddess knows whats next.
I'm Al Gore and I say that the world is going to end in 5 years, thank you for your attention and buy my book ''How I Made Money Losing An Election And Brainwashed Generations Of People Because Of it''
>global warming means record low temperatures
>we're entering an extremely dry period with expected torrential rainfall
>hottest ice age is upon us
nobody believed him, right?
Sorry, Chud, but while our predictions may have been wrong, the weather still changed, thus our predictions were right all along. Checkmate.
where I come from, we call that seasons, kid.
And we did, but no one else did so it didn't matter.
Late night comedy is going to save the world through Climate Night
I wouldn't do a single thing about this. I would listen to what they have to say. And that's what no one said.
Had he supported legislature to stop imports from China and India we wouldn't be in this mess. Wealthy far left globalists ruined the world.
How is nuclear waste a problem when we have this giant empty uninhabitable continent?
I will fix it as soon as the Netherlands sink.
Add in california