Did anyone hear the latest episode where they spent an hour and a half discussing the fake filmography of one of Tarantino's characters?
I feel like in any other podcast the host would get annoyed at that kind of self promotion but it required so much dedication and effort that it's sort of admirable and works like an extended comedy bit.
Not the direction I thought they'd take the podcast in
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
shuddup
Did you both work at that video store? Anything else I would like to know does Avary and Tarantino own the rights to use the name archive videos or is it too generic to be copyrighted?
i think once "Video Archives" was literally the name of the store they worked at and when it was closing Tarantino bought their entire catalogue. I have to assume he also bought any copyright associated with it if it was available.
And if he didn't buy the copyright back then, then he certainly has it now, or has been told he doesn't need it, as you don't put out a high profile podcast like this without checking those boxes
Tarantino bought the whole place? I also heard that he owns a cinema with a lot of history in los angeles
I think how much you enjoyed the latest episode depends on how much you liked his latest movie. I prefer it when they stick to talk about actual movies.
He bought everything except for the property and the laserdiscs, which Roger bought. Tarantino owns two theaters in LA.
Tarantino bought the entire thing in the 90s and rebuilt the store in his home.
Avary made Killing Zoe and it is severely underrated
Roger is a broken beta who owes every shred of his career to Quentin. He doesn't even try to argue movie points with QT anymore, he just concedes or goes off on some weird subjective emotional jag that can't be refuted because Quentin career mogs him so hard.
I wish they would talk about more current industry stuff or at least some insider Hollywood stories from Quentin's history. This old ass obscure movie formula they do is getting repetitive and boring. I don't care enough to watch like 80% of the stuff they talk about.
But then what the hell are these two two talking about?Do they only talk about old movies? Why do you say that Roger is a beta?
They talk about the videos from the video archives store. They usually watch those old tapes too and not blu rays
It was funny when Quentin sort of argued with Roger’s daughter about old men
Roger's the one with decent points about the movie's they discuss whereas Tarantino has the inside scoop about the making of the film, usually. So I can't agree, and don't really think the different paths their careers took comes out that often.
If there's a jealousy or resentment issue among them then it's hidden very well
>If there's a jealousy or resentment issue among them then it's hidden very well
There used to be--Roger quite openly said at certain points around the year 2000 that he doesn't even talk to Quentin because Q just steals all his ideas. It's clear they're currently on good terms: probably due to aging, perspective, water-under-the-bridge-type stuff people in their late 50s are more disposed to than people in their early 30s... especially when one of them was in prison for manslaughter and has zero career prospects except for this gift of a podcast from Tarantino.
cinema speculation was a fricking drag to get through. it's all pointless trivia like x actor was also in y, or how mcqueen doesnt like to talk much. real surface level shit that doesnt touch on anything about moviemaking
If Tarantino knows so much about movies, how all of his movies except for 2 suck complete ass?
Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction?
you are correct sir
>t. disingenuous filmschool hack who would shit his pants in QT's presence
i never went to film school. please refute me by mentioning which films other than those 2 are deserving of the praise he gets? the hollywood one was 'okay'
Especially considering the modern movie sludge we've all been subjected to the last two decades, Kill Bill, Basterds, Django, Hateful Eight and OUAT are all masterpiece tier in comparison. If anything he's underappreciated for his effort to keep celluloid auteur kino afloat. Beyond his films, he's also one of the greatest curators and promotors of film, pretty much singlehandedly bringing back awareness of forgotten spaghetti westerns, martial arts and exploitation movies. Not to mention the New Bev cinema in LA, all the podcasts he's put out, and speaking out against woke bullshit and the terrible era of movies we're in. He's a gem in a sea of shit but simultaneously taken for granted.
>Kill Bill
mediocre. should have been one movie. >Basterds
hugely overrated
>Django
dogshit
>Hateful Eight
double dogshit
>OUAT
'okay'
Your brain is dogshit.
Whoa, I feel like a film critic now.
you just listed his films and expected that to refute the point. you're the prototypical example of why tarantino is so overrated. you think because he put out the movie its automatically good. you have no taste.
Nah, I watched the films and they were actually funny and thrilling with unforgettable characters. Something that literally zero other modern writer-directors are capable of pulling off consistently.
>unforgettable characters
>muh token Black person
>muh bad cowboy
>muh le bad nazi and le good american
your opinion is invalid.
>Hateful Eight
>masterpiece
fanboy.
>Kill Bill, Basterds, Django, Hateful Eight
Yeh I did, I loved the plot descriptions for some of the bounty law episodes the most. I wish Leo could've been available for the fake interview
What was Bounty Law about?
That was the Rick Dalton 50s cowboy show. The one that stood out to me dealt with the guy that took pictures of horses in motion for Leland Stanford. It's a true story about an inventor who kills his wife lover and Jake Cahill (the Dalton character) has to find him before another Bounty hunter character finds him. I'm thinking this might be a candidate for Tarantino's eventual adaption of Bounty Law, as it's based on true history, has a detailed enough plot, can fit in a 30 minute time slow, etc.
Its sounds kino. What other episodes of the series were detailed by Tarantino?
One involving sammy davis jr and dorothy dandridge being members of a black town having a captive in their jail that they need to transport to another location before the captive's gang shows up to break him out. Incident at Parker Town it's called.
He also describes the basics of Bounty Law, can break into halfs, one half is him trying to get the bounty turned in while various things happen around Dalton's character that make things more interesting. The other half are stories where Dalton's character decides the bounty is innocent and he helps prove that bounty's innocence.
One ep is called Stagebound for Tuscon. Derek McAdams as the guest. The outlaw bounty is Big Bill, there's another famous gun fighter involved, Tom Horn. Dalton's character's prisoner get's killed by Tom Horn, but Horn intends to claim the full bounty for himself. Tom Horn says his reputation will allow him to claim the bounty for himself. Tom Horn wins, but there's a twist at the end.
At 59 mins in the podcast linked here
is where I'm getting this info from
What could have been the twist in the Tom Horn episode
I bet he's describing some of the adaptions he's going to shoot. If we see a Bounty Law adaption, we'll definitely find out.
https://the-video-archives-podcast-with-quentin-tarantino-and-roger.simplecast.com/episodes/day-of-the-dalton-pt-1-the-marshal-of-madrid-manhunter-NJWVhg9w
Here's the episode if anyone's curious.
>it's only the first part
what will next episode be, an interview with Rick Dalton's wife?
No clue, maybe goes into his career as a TV actor in the 80s. It's a nice touch to know that he stayed with his wife. In the book, Cliff thinks they'll get divorced and Rick will have to sell his treasured house.
was the most reddit cringe podcast I've ever heard
guy ritchie has had more hits than tarantino at this point, both critically and commercially.
seethe tarantulagays
>ohhhh but hes so zany and talks about movies a lot!
don't care, his movies still suck.
lmao. Richie has been a rudderless hack ever since Madonna broke him in the early 00s.
I too thought this until recently watching his latest kinos and by god they are better than anything tarantitjob ever made
nah
the gentlemen was alright that's it
if hollywood insider told you ritchie was hot again you'd be on here lauding his movies every day of the week let's face it
it's all about image
ritchie doesn't get a second chance yet tarantino can release a string of trash b-movies and everyone still sucks his high foreheaded dick
>ritchie doesn't get a second chance y
releasing 4 or 5 movies in the past couple years isn't getting a second chance? please, you're a fanboy and most of those new movies are shit
>but it required so much dedication and effort that it's sort of admirable and works like an extended comedy bit.
OP IS A homosexual