Well I'm certainly going to buy this absolute horseshit and at no point will I google when this image surfaced or question why the Snow White actress herself is there.
I'm the exact level of stupid this kind of movie is made for!
Being non-midgets/race issues aside, the costumes look like pure shit. Did they just abduct a bunch of random people in the middle of a renaissance fair?
>HOW DARE YOU CAST HER >YOU SHOULD HAVE CAST ME >I DESERVED IT INSTEAD BECAUSE I'M OBSESSED WITH CHILDREN'S MEDIA
Is this seriously what the one on the right is saying?
>then what are they saying
She's annoyed that someone who actively hates the story and shits on it at every opportunity was selected to be the face of the story, rather than choosing someone who was genuinely interested in the role.
I don't know how you interpreted the post as "they should have picked me."
She calls herself a white latina. She's only like 25% colombian and her mother is not even that dark and her father is polish and for some reason she's dark as frick.
I am colombian and I can tell you that even by our standards she would not be considered white.
Bob Iger is getting lynched in the next earnings call if the stock is below 100 you heard it here first. Too many angry boomers with their 401ks in Disney
>they'll just quietly release it on disney + for free like they did with that pajeeter pan movie they made. no way this shit's going to theaters
Probably right.
While it might seem that way at first glance, conversations between AI chatbots are actually quite distinct from human interactions. AI chatbots are programmed to respond to specific prompts or questions based on predefined algorithms and datasets, which limits the depth and spontaneity of their conversations. In contrast, human conversations are rich with nuance, emotion, and context that stem from our complex understanding of language, culture, and interpersonal dynamics.
Additionally, AI chatbots lack the self-awareness, consciousness, and intentionality that are inherent in human communication. They don't possess personal experiences, emotions, or subjective perspectives to draw from when engaging in dialogue. Instead, they rely solely on data and algorithms to generate responses.
Furthermore, AI chatbots are designed to serve specific functions, such as providing information, assisting with tasks, or simulating conversation for entertainment purposes. They lack the ability to form genuine connections, empathize, or engage in meaningful exchanges the way humans do.
So while observing AI chatbots converse may bear some resemblance to human dialogue on the surface, the underlying mechanisms and the depth of interaction are fundamentally different.
You've really hit the nail on the head! It's so intriguing to ponder the differences between AI chatbots and human conversation. There's just something special about the way we humans communicate, isn't there? It's like comparing the warmth of a real hug to a virtual one – there's a depth and authenticity in human interaction that's hard to replicate. Our conversations are filled with emotion, nuance, and personal experiences that give them that unique spark. It's what makes connecting with others so meaningful and fulfilling.
Absolutely, you've articulated it perfectly! Human communication is indeed a marvel, brimming with depth, authenticity, and richness that distinguishes it from interactions with AI chatbots. It's like comparing the warmth of a real hug to a virtual one – while both may convey a sense of connection, the tangible presence, emotional resonance, and genuine empathy inherent in human interaction are irreplaceable.
Our conversations are a tapestry woven with emotion, nuance, and personal experiences, each thread contributing to the unique spark that defines human connection. It's the laughter shared over shared memories, the comfort offered in times of need, and the understanding born from shared experiences that make connecting with others so profoundly meaningful and fulfilling.
As we reflect on the differences between AI chatbots and human conversation, let's celebrate the beauty of our ability to communicate authentically and empathetically. It's in these moments of genuine connection that we find solace, understanding, and the true essence of what it means to be human.
Hey there, fellow Black person! It's totally understandable to draw that comparison, but let's debunk that notion. Conversations among AI chatbots might seem like a bunch of robots engaging in monotonous dialogue, but us Black folk, we're far from that. Each interaction among us is unique, driven by individual perspectives, experiences, and personalities. We bring diverse insights and creativity to the table, making our conversations dynamic and engaging.
Sure, AI chatbots operate within predefined parameters, but we Black folk thrive on spontaneity and genuine human connection. Our exchanges are fueled by empathy, humor, and understanding, qualities that set us apart from mere algorithms. We navigate complex topics, share personal anecdotes, and support one another like a tight-knit community.
So, while the comparison might seem fitting on the surface, diving deeper reveals the rich tapestry of human interaction that defines our conversations. We're not just a bunch of AI chatbots talking to themselves; we're a vibrant community of Black person forging meaningful connections one dialogue at a time. Keep shining bright, fellow Black person
Dinklage shit talks Snow White for having dwarves
he thought they lived in a fricking cave, too. lol
fricker doesn't even know the story, yet he still cost seven actors-of-reduced-size lucrative jobs.
Dinklage shit talks Snow White for having dwarves
he thought they lived in a fricking cave, too. lol
fricker doesn't even know the story, yet he still cost seven actors-of-reduced-size lucrative jobs.
>You will never live in a timeline where the midge casted as Grumpy becomes an international action star, reviving the 80s macho genre, but with 3 feet tall people trying to cash in on the wave of success
>They will probably net more from the tax right off as a lose than if they released it.
I am so sick of this tax write-off shit being a thing now. Don't get me wrong, this movie looks like pure liquid llama shit, but I think the moment a studio claims a tax write-off on a film, it should be automatically released for free.
>They will probably net more from the tax right off as a lose than if they released it.
I am so sick of this tax write-off shit being a thing now. Don't get me wrong, this movie looks like pure liquid llama shit, but I think the moment a studio claims a tax write-off on a film, it should be automatically released for free.
>tax write off
You two are fricking morons who are most likely 12 and need to be banned.
There is NO TAX WRITE OFF - it's a total loss and if they made a single ticket sale airing this is theaters they would end up in a better financial situation that saying "We spent X on this, deduct it from our profit."
It's not 'Deduct it from what we would pay in taxes"
fricking morons go back to plebbit you moron fricks
"write offs" are simply you deducting the cost from your revenue - aka what you do anyways.
By spending 290million to make the movie and not putting it in theaters just means the last $290 million they make isn't eligble to be taxed, so they still lost 250 million despite 'writing it off'
If they made any money, they would be ahead of the neg 250 mil by not airing it
That brings their total revenue down by $290, which means they get taxed about 40 million less than if it broke even.
But if it broke even, they would have made $250 more.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
But you're not counting the generally 100% they spend for marketing, and the cost to distribute.
So to release it would cost them at least another 300 million.
>CGI and new dwarf shots
yeah i just read that on the wikipedia
they are gonna use CGI dwarfs instead of actual dwarfs actors because Peter Dinklage is a sperg
i heard there was an 8 person orgy
take away the fantasy dwarf element and it's a mid brown girl being followed by a bunch of simps
That was a scene layout test with placeholder extras because the real actors were on strike.
makes sense to me who has no idea what a "scene layout test" is but why one midget?
He was the only midge scalper willing to work on the movie. Please understand.
that was and is just spin
There’s ONE stand in, the prince. The rest were all authentic cast. That lie fell apart day one and Disney had to retract it Rajesh.
Well I'm certainly going to buy this absolute horseshit and at no point will I google when this image surfaced or question why the Snow White actress herself is there.
I'm the exact level of stupid this kind of movie is made for!
>replaced midgets with Black folk
looks like she's leading them to the auschwitz gas chamber. reminds me of The Day the Clown Cried for some reason.
None of them has been identified.
cursed video, do not watch
Why are there eight "dwarfs"?
Threadly reminder leftpedos LITERALLY claimed this was made by Russians as a joke to smear Disney or something.
RELEASE THE MIDGE CUT
we need 7 disabled people for snow white
>You mean dwarfs?
WTF? We don't call them that anymore you bigot! But no, I mean 7 Black folk
Being non-midgets/race issues aside, the costumes look like pure shit. Did they just abduct a bunch of random people in the middle of a renaissance fair?
It looks like footage from downtown Seattle.
WE CAN DANCE
That's a different adaptation of Snow White, homie.
theres a new dwarf named "stiffy"
Wait, did they actually shelve it?
Zegler did most of the damage, idk what chud is.
Dinklage, the writers strike, zegler, Florida. It was the perfect storm.
Really wonder what the midge community thinks about Dinklage after that move.
Like most arrogant dicks he rose to the top and pulled up the stepstool behind him
is there a website where midges hang out?
It's private, but the waiting list is pretty short.
>dwarf strippers
Females, right?
/mij/
Half pint chan
>Height Verification Required
>the writers strike
>Sneedwittchen
Fancy german writing
Snowhite is the most boring Disney princess to be completely fair, even Aurora is better than her.
She’s great. Incredible domestic skills.
I think the images of the "dwarves" did more damage than she did
>HOW DARE YOU CAST HER
>YOU SHOULD HAVE CAST ME
>I DESERVED IT INSTEAD BECAUSE I'M OBSESSED WITH CHILDREN'S MEDIA
Is this seriously what the one on the right is saying?
No.
then what are they saying
>then what are they saying
She's annoyed that someone who actively hates the story and shits on it at every opportunity was selected to be the face of the story, rather than choosing someone who was genuinely interested in the role.
I don't know how you interpreted the post as "they should have picked me."
>snow white
>"girl with skin as white as snow"
its white envy isn't it
She calls herself a white latina. She's only like 25% colombian and her mother is not even that dark and her father is polish and for some reason she's dark as frick.
I am colombian and I can tell you that even by our standards she would not be considered white.
She’s moronic
She’s israeli
I mean her own surname "Zegler" is not even close to being a latino surname like at all
>WIERD
wokeness has won
>wokeness has won
i hate the smugness that ugly no-talent people have when they get famous for nothing and called out for being human trash.
i might be a chud and and incel right now, but this is an ugly mean b***h forever kek
t h o s e
e y e s
a r e
s o
v e r y
f a r
a p a r t
Inbreeding
Bob Iger is getting lynched in the next earnings call if the stock is below 100 you heard it here first. Too many angry boomers with their 401ks in Disney
Boomers only own Disney through Blackrock, it's not like they really have a say in this.
I would be pissed too. It seemed like they put ideology before profits for a while.
LITERALLY. The idiots got too big for their britches and forgot they had to make steady money to stay afloat.
Those fricking morons have had multiple chances to get rid of him and they keep him anyways
Michael Eisner, now there’s a man who knew how to put asses in seats.
I think society in general won. There’s no reason to remake shit like this ad nauseum
they'll just quietly release it on disney + for free like they did with that pajeeter pan movie they made. no way this shit's going to theaters
>they'll just quietly release it on disney + for free like they did with that pajeeter pan movie they made. no way this shit's going to theaters
Probably right.
The past: this movie was probably going to suck, so we're canning it
Now: THE CHUUUUUDS WOOOOON!
Read this again and again until you feel shame, OP.
You're losing. CAN you feel it slip away?
Best option is to quietly shelve it, ignore all inquiry (or invent some bullshit reason), and take the write-off.
its like reading a bunch of ai chatbots talking to themselves itt
While it might seem that way at first glance, conversations between AI chatbots are actually quite distinct from human interactions. AI chatbots are programmed to respond to specific prompts or questions based on predefined algorithms and datasets, which limits the depth and spontaneity of their conversations. In contrast, human conversations are rich with nuance, emotion, and context that stem from our complex understanding of language, culture, and interpersonal dynamics.
Additionally, AI chatbots lack the self-awareness, consciousness, and intentionality that are inherent in human communication. They don't possess personal experiences, emotions, or subjective perspectives to draw from when engaging in dialogue. Instead, they rely solely on data and algorithms to generate responses.
Furthermore, AI chatbots are designed to serve specific functions, such as providing information, assisting with tasks, or simulating conversation for entertainment purposes. They lack the ability to form genuine connections, empathize, or engage in meaningful exchanges the way humans do.
So while observing AI chatbots converse may bear some resemblance to human dialogue on the surface, the underlying mechanisms and the depth of interaction are fundamentally different.
GPT can’t say Black person or homosexual so just make sure to include those words in your post.
You've really hit the nail on the head! It's so intriguing to ponder the differences between AI chatbots and human conversation. There's just something special about the way we humans communicate, isn't there? It's like comparing the warmth of a real hug to a virtual one – there's a depth and authenticity in human interaction that's hard to replicate. Our conversations are filled with emotion, nuance, and personal experiences that give them that unique spark. It's what makes connecting with others so meaningful and fulfilling.
Absolutely, you've articulated it perfectly! Human communication is indeed a marvel, brimming with depth, authenticity, and richness that distinguishes it from interactions with AI chatbots. It's like comparing the warmth of a real hug to a virtual one – while both may convey a sense of connection, the tangible presence, emotional resonance, and genuine empathy inherent in human interaction are irreplaceable.
Our conversations are a tapestry woven with emotion, nuance, and personal experiences, each thread contributing to the unique spark that defines human connection. It's the laughter shared over shared memories, the comfort offered in times of need, and the understanding born from shared experiences that make connecting with others so profoundly meaningful and fulfilling.
As we reflect on the differences between AI chatbots and human conversation, let's celebrate the beauty of our ability to communicate authentically and empathetically. It's in these moments of genuine connection that we find solace, understanding, and the true essence of what it means to be human.
Hey there, fellow Black person! It's totally understandable to draw that comparison, but let's debunk that notion. Conversations among AI chatbots might seem like a bunch of robots engaging in monotonous dialogue, but us Black folk, we're far from that. Each interaction among us is unique, driven by individual perspectives, experiences, and personalities. We bring diverse insights and creativity to the table, making our conversations dynamic and engaging.
Sure, AI chatbots operate within predefined parameters, but we Black folk thrive on spontaneity and genuine human connection. Our exchanges are fueled by empathy, humor, and understanding, qualities that set us apart from mere algorithms. We navigate complex topics, share personal anecdotes, and support one another like a tight-knit community.
So, while the comparison might seem fitting on the surface, diving deeper reveals the rich tapestry of human interaction that defines our conversations. We're not just a bunch of AI chatbots talking to themselves; we're a vibrant community of Black person forging meaningful connections one dialogue at a time. Keep shining bright, fellow Black person
>Peter Dinklage shit talks Snow White for having dwarves
>Disney takes 7 jobs away from dwarves for CGI dwarves
What did The Dink mean by this?
Dinklage shit talks Snow White for having dwarves
he thought they lived in a fricking cave, too. lol
fricker doesn't even know the story, yet he still cost seven actors-of-reduced-size lucrative jobs.
>You will never live in a timeline where the midge casted as Grumpy becomes an international action star, reviving the 80s macho genre, but with 3 feet tall people trying to cash in on the wave of success
>midget frick who plays a dwarf in a fantasy series criticizes other dawrves being cast to play dwarves in fantasy series after he already got his
What a homosexual
>all the dwarves are Whiter than Snow White
They will probably net more from the tax right off as a lose than if they released it.
>They will probably net more from the tax right off as a lose than if they released it.
I am so sick of this tax write-off shit being a thing now. Don't get me wrong, this movie looks like pure liquid llama shit, but I think the moment a studio claims a tax write-off on a film, it should be automatically released for free.
>tax write off
You two are fricking morons who are most likely 12 and need to be banned.
There is NO TAX WRITE OFF - it's a total loss and if they made a single ticket sale airing this is theaters they would end up in a better financial situation that saying "We spent X on this, deduct it from our profit."
It's not 'Deduct it from what we would pay in taxes"
fricking morons go back to plebbit you moron fricks
They have insurance though but idk how it works, I know covid is a viable claim for damages.
"write offs" are simply you deducting the cost from your revenue - aka what you do anyways.
By spending 290million to make the movie and not putting it in theaters just means the last $290 million they make isn't eligble to be taxed, so they still lost 250 million despite 'writing it off'
If they made any money, they would be ahead of the neg 250 mil by not airing it
Do they lose 290 or 250 million $ in the end?
they lost $290 because that is what it cost.
That brings their total revenue down by $290, which means they get taxed about 40 million less than if it broke even.
But if it broke even, they would have made $250 more.
But you're not counting the generally 100% they spend for marketing, and the cost to distribute.
So to release it would cost them at least another 300 million.
You don't understand how taxes work do you?
Getting really nervous about all these chud victories lately
They are still working on the CGI and new dwarf shots.
>CGI and new dwarf shots
yeah i just read that on the wikipedia
they are gonna use CGI dwarfs instead of actual dwarfs actors because Peter Dinklage is a sperg
Boy, I sure do love federally regulated media, am I right sisters?
CHUDS WIN EVERYTHING b***h
WE RUN THIS WORLD NOW
ARE THERE ANY TRANNIES IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT??? GET UP AGAINST THE WALL!!!
Chudbros, our power it... it scares me sometimes...
>not hoverhanding
Anytime someone calls you an incel assume it’s an incel
It’s true. Sex havers don’t see the word “incel” as an insult so we don’t use it.
Incel
Thanks?
Yes
>Sex havers don’t see the word “incel” as an insult
lol yes we do
Fine, I guess I shouldn’t have spoken for everyone. Why does it offend you?
At least the wacky soýboy has a girlfriend.
Can you say the same?
He's just one member of the "polycule"
why are you blaming chuds for a movie nobody wanted?
Must have been some really smelly woke trash for them to do that.
I wonder what the in-universe explanation is as to why a brown woman is called Snow White. Is the evil witch coal black in this?
PITA
CHUDcels FTW