Did the moon footage age well?

Did the moon footage age well?

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    yeah, its a piece of history

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I watch productions just for the HISTORICAL FACTOR
      Fag

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    yeah people still think it was real

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because it couldn't be faked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ML2ZYYFOnI

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, they could totally fake it with all that 1960s CGI.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Have you heard of a little movie called 2001: A Space Odyssey?

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    who's tilting the camera upwards? why can't I see any stars in the background?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >who's tilting the camera upwards?
      remote control from earth

      >why can't I see any stars in the background?
      exposure settings of the camera.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >>why can't I see any stars in the background?
        >exposure settings of the camera.

        This kind of stuff would convince me the moon landing was real, even if I was a dumb conspiracy theorist. If it was fake, they wouldn't fuck up things like the stars, the flag waving, or a number of other things you'd never even think of unless the footage was actually from the moon.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Normoids don't know how to operate their computers or cars correctly and they use them every single day. They consistently get tricked by basic framing and telephoto compression/fisheye distortion. The idea that they would understand first hand a technical appeal related to the specific limitations of filmstock, sensors and exposure is a goddamn pipedream.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >who's tilting the camera upwards?
      the launch was timed to the second, due to a little thing called orbital mechanics.
      Now; if you know exactly when something is going to happen do you think its possible that the best and brightest at NASA could possibly have made a camera rig that operated on a timer?

      >who's tilting the camera upwards?
      remote control from earth

      >why can't I see any stars in the background?
      exposure settings of the camera.

      remote control from earth? why make a simple situation more complex with time delay to account for?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >time delay
        >on the moon
        based retard.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          moron

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            The moon is within our own orbit, there really isn't much of a time delay. It syncs up with the times on earth depending on rotation. In what moronic universe do you live where the moon's distance requires time dilation to account for?

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >isn't much of a time delay
              so you admit there is a time delay.
              >time dilation
              you mentioned dilation, not me. perhaps its time for you to go dilate

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >hurrr chud dilation meme
                There is not enough of a displacement through dilation to need major accounting for when it comes to radio transmissions you fucking retard.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                you seem to be getting wrapped up in your own argument.
                you must be a flat earther believer haha

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not a moronic Cinemaphiletard, I'm just explaining the very real fact that the moon is close enough where transmissions to it or almost instant.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                *are

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                and yet, you clever fucker, you missed my original point; there was no need to remote control the camera from earth at all:
                But it really was a case of third time lucky as both the attempts to capture take-off from Apollo 15 and 16 failed for different reasons.

                For these final three Apollo missions RCA supplied colour television cameras made to the strict weight and volume parameters that NASA imposed on the project to make sure everything could get out of Earth’s gravity well. The cameras were very successful, capturing images of numerous EVAs, but while they could be controlled from Houston it was felt that the several second delay between earth and the Moon would make capturing the Module’s ascent impossible. So, the plan was to pre-programme the camera and hope that the NASA camera operator in Houston, Ed Fendell, got his timing just right.

                On Apollo 15, the tilt mechanism malfunctioned, meaning that the camera never panned upwards and thus the lunar module rapidly accelerated upwards and out of the picture. On the Apollo 16 mission, the astronauts actually parked the rover in the wrong place, so while the camera worked perfectly it was too close to the Module and, again, it accelerated swiftly out of picture.

                Happily, Apollo 17 got everything right. But what is perhaps most remarkable about looking back on it was that no-one realised the significance of the lift-off at the time. Persistent rumour suggests that NASA had to pay the networks to cover the Apollo 17 mission at all, and when the final liftoff of humanity from the Moon took place, it barely raised a mention on that evening’s news reports.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                time delay earth-moon: 1.25 seconds

                while this is perceivable, in practice it is irrelevant in the context of your question

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                i diddnt ask a question, im the one explaining that the camera that filmed the module taking off was pre programmed using simple technology that people half a century later cant even conceive exists and say its proof of fakery

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                ok sorry, I'm getting you confused with the other guy who seems to have reading problems. I wonder if he even knows how to read English at a proper level because his posts stink of retarded or ESL.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >reading problems
                All I fucking said was that there isn't actual time dilation with radio transmissions to the moon, it's literally the only thing I said.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >why make a simple situation more complex with time delay to account for?

        radio stopped being complicated around the time we started building good fly-by-wire aircraft. The first fly-by-wire aircraft is the Apollo capsule.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Now post the one where it rotating above the earth and you see it hanging by steel wires right before it tilts

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah go on i want to see that

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine thinking this is real.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      ask the Russians and Chinese why they think it's real

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        They don't either.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        china got all the companies from usa seting factories there so maybe that was payment

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's an incredibly stupid idea and low effort suggestion. China has nothing to gain from that, especially when the UN seat was worth far more in terms of diplomatic recognition. It also says nothing about the Russian recognition of our moon landings.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >China has nothing to gain from that,
            what are you retarded? their whole economy got kickstarted by americans seting the factories there

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Dumb esl
              Probably latinx

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Brazilian most likely. The whole country is full of retards

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              lol retard

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Dumb esl
                Probably latinx

                explain how am I wrong

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Explain how you're right

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Don't be retarded, conspiretard

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Explain how you're right

                I take that as a win

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      redpill me then, prove it

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >talk to a moon landing conspiracy theorist
    >they think they have hard evidence the moon landing was faked
    >"The" 'moon landing?'
    >"just the one? I say
    >MFW they didn't know there more than one moon landing

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      nice, but how does that prove them incorrect

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >prove me incorrect
        You can literally see part of the Apollo and the flag through a telescope. You can do that right now, right fucking now.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          ???
          we know robots have been to the moon, the soviets long before "moon landing"
          you have no idea what y'all talking about

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Go to Cinemaphile with this drivel, retard.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          that's bullshit and youre a fucking gay
          even the most powerful telescope on earth cannot do that.
          have a nice day

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            my xiamoi mi11 can do that

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              lmfao youre a fucking gay im so fucking glad im not you

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >using a chinkphone

              what awful third world country are you from

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Where do you think the black box processor in yours comes from?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                says made in korea

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                That doesn't count as a chink processor now?

                didn't answer the question

                NTA.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >That doesn't count as a chink processor now?

                chink = chinese

                you are clearly retarded, ESL, or being very evasive at the very least

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Chink[1] is an English-language ethnic slur usually referring to a person of Chinese descent.[2]
                >The word is also sometimes indiscriminately used against people of East Asian and Southeast Asian appearance.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Chink = Chinese
                moron = Korean
                Nip = Japanese
                Zip = Vietnamese

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Nip = Japanese
                Their fucking country is Nippon this never made sense

                Also the moon landing was faked to beat the russians but we probably went there at some later point

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Nip sounds/feels pretty light tbh
                It's like being called a yank.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Again with the evasion. Chink = chinese in almost all circumstances. Don't care for your wikipedia link because in all use on the internet, imageboards and Cinemaphile chink = chinese and nothing else. This is because of the "ch" sound which indicates to me you're also an ESL as this is obvious to an English speaker.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                didn't answer the question

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Why are you like this? It's so astronomically stupid.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              oh yeah you proved everyone wrong with that pixelated picture in 2022 year of our Lord
              KEK

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                This effort is pathetic.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                watch this, gay

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=65yCfKel-zQ
                A youtuber with a telescope worth more than your salary and half a million subscribers says he can't but you can with a chink phone
                ok gay lmfao

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You literally btfo yourself with that video though are you unwell?

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              You absolutely cannot view tiny objects like the flag or anything else left on the lunar surface via a telescope from Earth. This pic comes from:

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Reconnaissance_Orbiter

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You quite literally can see the reflections from the lunar crafts left on the surface through a telescope. I honestly don't understand this type of "pretending to be retarded"

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Using a telescope? No. Lasers? Yes, but that doesn’t mean you can see the flag or any of the other stuff left behind with a telescope. You most certainly cannot.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Addendum to this post: NO you absolutely cannot see “reflections from the lunar crafts” you total retard. You can bounce a laser beam off of reflectors that were set up on the lunar surface, not the crafts themselves.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why do you lie about this so vehemently? What is your goal?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Lasers
                i read that pointing the lazer to a random coordinate vs the alleged location of the "mirrors" they "left" on the surface yields essentially the same results

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You most certainly can see the lunar crafts with a telescope, why are you memeing this hard for? I truly don't understand this bullshit you are doing.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Completely false. You’re either trolling or misinformed. No telescope from Earth can see objects on the moon that small.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                What about the most powerful land one

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                What? No. The only reason this

                Why are you like this? It's so astronomically stupid.

                image was captured is because it was taken by a satellite that is much, much, much closer to the moon than Earth is. Same deal with Google Earth images which are captured using relatively low flying planes.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Use hubble

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I honest to fuck can't tell if you are trolling or this genuinely stupid.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can’t see manmade objects on the moon with even the most powerful telescope on Earth. End of story.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Whatever you say, retard.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Prove me wrong. I’ll wait.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I could send you a dozen pictures but you'll just deny they are real, like the Cinemaphileschizo you are.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >could
                But won't

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Because it won't be enough for you, bet you are a flat tard.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                False asumptions are all you have to deflect with.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is the world round, anon?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes. Now go ahead an post those moon images from a telescope.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, that's besides the point. Address the matter at hand.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                No you can’t.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                How's this then?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Reconnaissance_Orbiter

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                are you fucking stupid? Yes I know it was shot by the LRO.

                Are you just using Google Translate now?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                That’s not a telescope from Earth, anon. I don’t even know what we’re arguing about now.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                It sure isn't, but that wasn't the subject of debate here

                I could send you a dozen pictures but you'll just deny they are real, like the Cinemaphileschizo you are.

                and

                No you can’t.

                when you claimed no images of it exist. It does, using the LRO.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                That absolutely was the debate. That anon was claiming you can use a telescope on Earth to see evidence of the moon landings.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Again with the evasion. Go back to >>>Cinemaphile if you only want to argue semantics and not provide evidence to your position.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                That’s not arguing semantics at all. You definitively cannot see manmade objects on the moon using a telescope on Earth.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Prove it

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Already have. I asked for telescopic images and was provided with pictures taken by the LRO.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Then how do you explain the LRO's images? You haven't provided an alternative theory.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've seen some shilling on this site but never this rampant hostility

                Most gnomish poster ITT

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                What theory? The LRO is a satellite that orbits the moon. That’s not even remotely close to being a telescope on Earth.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                The theory concerning the moon landing conspiracies posted by you earlier, as to the moon landing. How do you explain the images made by the LRO?

                You can't prove a negative with another negative. Which is the basic logical fallacy you're making here.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I think you’re confusing me with someone else. I fully believe the moon landings are real as evidenced by the images taken by the LRO. I’m mainly arguing with the troll trying to claim that you can view the Apollo landing sites with a telescope on Earth.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I doubt that because then you posted this

                You don't have any images from a surface telescope. That's my proof.

                , at the very least you're causing a lot of confusion and does it really matter when the moon landings happened?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm not

                I think you’re confusing me with someone else. I fully believe the moon landings are real as evidenced by the images taken by the LRO. I’m mainly arguing with the troll trying to claim that you can view the Apollo landing sites with a telescope on Earth.

                . All I posted was the post about needing an objective the size of a stadium, and the one making fun of normoids for not understanding anything about optics or photography.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                I think younger posters assume that we have the technology to view the moon like Google street view just because we’ve advanced to the point of smartphones and such. To them I say: I wish, but disappointingly, we do not.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You are the worst kind of shit eating garden gnome

                My .02 shekels as another observer of your shilling

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You haven't proved you can't see it with a telescope

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                >doesn't know shit about optics
                You'd need a telescope with an objective or primary reflector the size of a goddamn baseball stadium and some crazy signal interpretation software to get the detail you'd want from a telescope on earth's surface having to deal with all that atmosphere. The only way you can see anything lander sized on the moon is from outside the atmosphere up in lunar orbit preferably and even then with what we have available we've only got a few pixels to work with.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Then prove it

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don't have any images from a surface telescope. That's my proof.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not every picture posted is from the fucking Orbiter, retard.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes it is. Again: No telescope on Earth is able to view manmade objects on the lunar surface.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                No you would need a telescope that is 200 meters in diameter to see that.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              I-is that a speck?? That's proof!!!

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Anon you're joking right

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >duuude, they totally the moon landing. I mean landings. Several times, over multiple years.
        >they also faked skylab too
        >oh, and the Russians, our enemy, um, they were IN ON IT

        lol

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Go to Cinemaphile with this drivel, retard.

          NASAIDF just got an alert to the thread
          reading off the script of debunked points as usual i see...

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Ok once again, you can literally see all the Apollo crafts we left behind through a telescope. You can do that right now you complete gay. A telescope with the range to do that costs less than 200 at your hobby shop. You fucking brain-adled moron.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              Can you link me a good one? Preferably one thats decent for a beginner. I have always wanted a telescope.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              No you cannot
              post a link gay

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                You realize you can, right?

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                A youtuber with a telescope worth more than your salary and half a million subscribers says he can't but you can with a chink phone
                ok gay lmfao

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                He literally shows you can see the Apollo crafts through that telescope you lying flat tard.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                "hurr durr I can see the flag with my phone"
                no you cant, even this guy with a good setup cannot
                "hurr durr he literally says you can see something else I didnt mention"

                fucking gay

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                Literally nobody said through your phone. I said a commercial telescope with good lenses you can buy can, you obfuscating retard. He literally shows you that you can see the crafts.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                you're speaking stupid and not even reading the thread, go back to raeddit or whatever place you came from

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lmao, I had a similar interaction
      My friend was trying to say it was fake and he said "if it was real why didn't we go back?", and I'm like "we did go back. Thirteen times."
      To his credit once I showed him that he acquiesced that the landings were real

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      i had a coworker say that the first one was fake but the later ones were real

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's slightly more reasonable. There's motivation at least because of the space race

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Still stupid but at least plausible: Apollo 11 would have just ejected an empty LEM which would have re-docked in the manner suggested. Still a dumb suggestion but NASA could have at least pulled such a bluff off as later missions would prove them right anyway.

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    it was film, lunacognita on youtube did some interesting analysis of the footage but they stopped posting years ago and their channel has now gone.
    my favorite was the orbital footage from the command module showing small white spheres emerging from craters in the distance and flying away from the moon.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    what if the footage was bogus but the landings were real?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      that's the plot of a movie i recently saw, was pretty kino

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        title me plox

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Operation Avalanche i think by a quick google search

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            thanks generous third party bro

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >tfw astronauts were actually just retarded at filming so they had to do re-shoots on Earth

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I always figured that was the case.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    We landed on the moon, but we lost a couple of missions/crews. We didn't bring them back. So they faked the footage.

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I remember watching the Tesla car space launch on live stream and for a second or two it showed the car actually being in some sort of large room surrounded by a bunch of panels. Snopes says the Tesla car is actually in space, which naturally, makes me think the opposite

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      think whatever you like, your ideas will never change the world in any way

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      There should be a recording somewhere.
      Anyway this wouldnt surprise me at all. The whole concept just seems weird as fuck.

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    They found aliums on the moon, that's why they faked the footage. We are still going there regularly.

  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    How did they get the footage from a camera left on the moon

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      My bro asking the real questions

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    no, fake as fuck

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      so how does it feel to be in a vaccuum in one sixth of the earths gravity?
      HURR looks fake.
      Yes, of course it does. It is a different environment to anything you will ever understand or have any meaningful perspective about.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >obviously wearing harnesses suspended by wires
        >DURRR IT"S A DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENT OF COURSE IT LOOKS LIKE THEY"RE BEING HOISTED BY A HARNESS
        fake as fuck lmao

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >isn't much of a time delay
          so you admit there is a time delay.
          >time dilation
          you mentioned dilation, not me. perhaps its time for you to go dilate

          awful, terrible bait. Go back to Cinemaphile or whatever hole you crawled out from.

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            go back to your television and corn syrup globetard

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          could you return here after you learn what fractions are and develop a conceptual imagination.
          dont type anything else, you are a moron

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >clear video of someone being hoisted by their torso in a harness
            >LOL YOU JUST DON"T UNDERSTAND FRACTIONS
            holy fucking unbelievable cope

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              >clear video
              of a man with fuck all holding him down
              >must be suspended with a harness in order for it to happen that way.
              you are a moron

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                no no no, please go back to talking about fractions. You definitely were making a good point by bringing up fractions as a defense to the harness

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It is a different environment to anything you will ever understand or have any meaningful perspective about so you can't say it's fake
        >however despite the same applying to me i can say its real :*~~))

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Looks pretty fun

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >ywn bounce around on the lunar surface like a retard with your bros

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can even see their fucking wires, embarrassing

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    wait a second, how did we get color when they only broadcast back to earth in black and white
    surely the film reel is still on the moon

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because NASA got color, B&W was the rebroadcast from NASA HQ. Also: later Apollo missions used better color cameras and are higher definition. Full-frame shots of the moon were taken as well and on the national archives website.

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    When I was a kid I had the impression that astronauts come and go to the moon often. It still feels like that.

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    John Madden! John Madden? John Madden! John Madden? John Madden! John Madden? John Madden! John Madden? John Madden! John Madden? John Madden! John Madden? John Madden! John Madden? John Madden! John Madden?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Aeiou

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      here comes another chinese earthquake

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      football!

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    We've never been to the moon, and going to Mars is peak human arrogance and hubris.

    We have wars, genocide, famine, crime, religious quarrels, murder, torture and we think we deserve to be a space-faring civilization. Fuck Elon Musk and fuck "I fucking love science!!!" sois.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Retarded luddite. It's not like half the tech we use today on a daily basis is a result of nasa research.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dont care about moon but colinizing Mars was always absolute bullshit. I remember normalfag retards believing colonies will be on the moon within like 5-10 years and that was about 10 years ago.
      If anyone will actually go then it will be a one way trip.

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    How come we don't have more footage on the moon if we been there several times?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      We have plenty, but it's boring rock collection over a few hours each time.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's a lot but most of it is pretty boring and a lot of it is potato quality analog video.
      The stuff they shot on film is really good quality, but that requires one of the two astronauts to be filming when they could be doing other more important tasks, so there is less of it. Plus the film itself has mass and volume, which is limited in the spacecraft.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      There's lots, it used to be easy to see back in the mid 2000s, but now most of it on paywall archive sites and youtube has gotten rid of all videos it cant monetize

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    For me, it's The Young Ones.

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    we got some globebusters watchers in here

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    How come the commies just didn't expose the US for this if it was fake? Honest question.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Theyre the ones that made up the rumors on it being fake. They paid off some shithole newspapers in literal who-tier countries to run the rumor and it spiraled out to brain broking dorks to this day.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        But why not just out right say it's fake?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Because they knew the west would call it out as propaganda and people would believe them. But if it comes from some random press somewhere people are willing to buy it easier. Sock puppets yo.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      They're in on it

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      because Russia and the West are actually friends and all that war business is just for show to trick taxpayers into paying higher taxes.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I heard a theory that some commies wanted Kennedy dead and CIA cleaned up sloppy soviet ends to prevent world war 3 and they demanded recognition of moon landing as reparation for that.

  22. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Look I know the US government lies about everything, but they're telling the truth this time!

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I know the US government lies about everything
      the US government is the most transparent in history, prove they lied about anything ever

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        The USS Liberty

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Human plutonium experiment

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nayirah testimony

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Operation Northwood

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Look, it's the best kept secret all right? if people found out earth was flat they would know the bible and jeeeesus are real and ether is real

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >conflating flat earth bullshit with actual inquiry
        thanks for confirming the moon landing was fake I guess, glowie

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I'm just making inquiries bro just asking da questions senpai fr fr no cap

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      So you've fallen into the trap that nothing is real and live in a post truth world at that point. I am not real, im just an AI programmed to replay to you arent I?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Look I know the millions of religions and quadrillions of gods are made up but mine is real

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nice I also praise the Mesopotamian God of Heaven Anu, nice to see a brother

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            >in the year of our lord current year+7
            >believing in a bicameral god you can't yourself hear
            >being conscious enough to have the volition to pray and praying to a bicameral god of all things
            I think you're confused anon.

  23. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The radiation from the X-ray machine at the airport ruined my vacation photos. Thank god there isn’t any cancer inducing radiation around the Earth.

  24. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, those special effects look really cheap and fake by today's standards.
    JJ Abrams to direct the reboot.

  25. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just started watching for all mankind and was disgusted by the border hopping Hispanics plot
    What the fuck was up with that

  26. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    those boomers didn't even have a plan for a backup
    they only set it up for live broadcast so someone literally had to point the film camera at a CRT

  27. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why did Nasa retroactively change what the path of the rocket was after people started asking questions about the Van Allen belt 3 years after the “””landing”””?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      do you have a link to what you're talking about?

      note: youtube videos don't count

  28. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I hate to sound like a schizo but the thought of space being fake fills me so much dread

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why? The nature of space turns our lives into a type of prison.

  29. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    And then nasa lost all the original footage. Also, the blue prints of the first craft that took man to the moon and back again. Seriously, Google it.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Humans aren't infallible

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Also, the blue prints of the first craft that took man to the moon and back again.

      There were six more successful manned moon landings after Apollo 11, anon.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        What?!

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          There were 7 moon landings. Are you fucking stupid or being intentionally obtuse?

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            Seven cgi videos?

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              what are you even talking about, now? that's a non sequitur

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                We can all make up words anon

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                So you *are* using Google Translate, because non sequitur is a commonplace Latin term (like et cetera, or etc) to describe nonsense phrases that don't follow as it means "it does not follow". Google Translate doesn't translate it well, especially not into non-Latin languages like Mandarin or Russian.

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                *latinx

              • 3 months ago
                Anonymous

                wrong, and it's clear you aren't even mexican because by "latin" I mean "roman" not mexican. Even chicanos know this, I'd bet $5 you're some sort of russian shill

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the blue prints of the first craft that took man to the moon and back agai
      Which landing?

  30. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Answer this questions:

    1) can humans (and film footage) survive the Van Allen belt?

    2) why didn’t the Russians call it fake?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nasa and it's Soviet equivalent were both staffed by Nazi expats making bank on the two countrys' paranoia. So long as the space race kept going, they were swimming in dosh. What better way to secure funding than get your buddies to up the ante for the "enemy"?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      1.Yes, do you understand how radiation works?
      2.they did see

      Theyre the ones that made up the rumors on it being fake. They paid off some shithole newspapers in literal who-tier countries to run the rumor and it spiraled out to brain broking dorks to this day.

  31. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The same people telling you the moon landing was real are the same people telling you to be ashamed of the founding fathers.
    Jack Parsons was a satanist.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      The same people telling you HIV-AIDS are real are the same people telling you to be ashamed of the founding fathers, too. I don't go around trying to eat AIDS for super-immunity against HIV.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      the founding fathers were a bunch of extreme liberals who read philosophy books voraciously and would never, ever in a million years want anything to do with a bunch of yeehaw fucking fascists, that's the kind of shit they were trying to get around and just never dreamed people would be fucking retarded enough to look at their work and think "yeah, unrestricted weapons causing mass murders, policing women's bodies, and white supremacy with zero separation between church and state, got it, thanks a lot guys love to crack a brewski with you one of these days". They'd fucking kill themselves out of shame.

    • 3 months ago
      ἐντελής

      As if that's a detriment. Hail Satan.

  32. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    the Greeks accurately measured the size of the earth with two sticks and math but now we have retarded americans (for the most part) debating the earth is flat and space is fake but also refuse to sail a boat to the edge of the earth or whatever. scared they'll fall off I suppose.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't believe that space is fake or flat earth. Just years of hearing all these fucking opinions kind of gets to you, you know?
      I have trouble believing anything anymore.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        so you're an impressionable retard

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Probably

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        then you are incredibly stupid and gullible, also known as a "mark"

        how the hell do you even have an "opinion" on 3rd grade physics

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't watch wrestling tho

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            a "mark" is a general term for a victim of a scam, it's used in /woo/ because, obviously, anyone who takes wrestling opinions seriously is by definition a mark for devoting time and energy to a sport that doesn't have that much thought or philosophy behind it. Which is how Vince has scammed people and consolidated all TV pro wrestling into his personal monopoly.

            • 3 months ago
              Anonymous

              bro I honestly don't care, didn't read.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Reading shit on Cinemaphile and facebook gets to you
        I hate americans so much it's unreal, or are you a third worlder ?

  33. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    They have to fake the footage because when they did land they found existing structures and a whole fleet of ships of course they aren't allowed to talk about it now.

  34. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    why does everything need to be a conspiracy?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because zoomers are terminally online and the world is abjectly boring and it doesn't jive well with their "I need exciting content all of the time for my dopamine fixes"

  35. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I find it funny the feds, after decades of demoralizing and destroying the country, get so defensive that less and less people believe them about the moon landing. They clearly don't care when people know they run drugs, stage shootings, burn kids alive, start pedo cults and kidnap hobos to experiment with mind control. They don't care that people know they sell out US secrets to the Chinese and who ever else will pay for it. They don't care that people know they start wild fires and arm rioters to drive down property value, so why do they care so much that people don't believe them about the moon?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      true schizoid moment
      >the feds don't care about x because i say so
      >the feds really care a lot about y because i say so
      are these feds in the room with you right now, anon?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      retarded comment, it was Nixon who started the War on Drugs and paid for it by killing the planned Apollo space station and Mars shot

      You know, the DEA. The people who take drugs away.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        >War on Drugs and paid for it by killing the planned Apollo space station and Mars shot
        now this is schizo posting

  36. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I cant believe people still debate about this stuff. People who claim its fake see images and videos, dont understand how it was done, and assume that therefore it must be i possible, refuse to do any research and also refuse to accept any counter arguments or explanations, because its all lies. Might as well argue about the holocaust next.

  37. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    i look at moon with my binoculars and it looks beautiful
    🙂

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      newfag spotted, post tits

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        everybody is mean in this thread i wanted to post something positive, which is that the moon, real or not, is very pretty

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          wrong board moron, this isn't Cinemaphile or Cinemaphile

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          It is pretty, anon. Thank you for posting.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          you come onto a board known for shitposting and you're expecting people to take you seriously? /misc/ is one of the worst boards, having spawned some of the most obnoxious memes, and you're expecting people to post about the moon and not conspiracy theories?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          newfag LURK MORE

  38. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The intelligence of this websites posters has gone severely downhill over the last 10 years

  39. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone who says the moon landings were faked is an anti-American shill.

  40. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Since twitter harasses movie studios all the time to change stupid details from uocoming movies there should be a trend hashtag were we force nasa to repeat the moon landing in less than a year or else space is proven to be fake.

    They always say "we dont go to the moon because its expensive and pointless" vidya is akso expensive and pointless yet most of us are going to consoome it until we hit 70 and go blind

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Retard there is a moon mission happening

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      So here’s the thing: Just because we have iPhones doesn’t mean we can just push a button and 3D print a rocket that can take people to the moon.

      1. NASA had almost unlimited funding back in the 1960s
      2. So much of that shit was proprietary and manufactured by now defunct companies in the USA. We outsourced that shit to China long ago.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_program

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        So sick of all these reboots amirite XD

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          This program is to make a lunar orbiting station. If succsefull this could lead to regurly being able to visit the moon and jump start resource extraction. The station wil be equipped to maintain rivers and other scientific instruments

  41. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The sad truth is that the USA probably largely abandoned manned space exploration because we didn’t find any valuable resources on the moon. If we found some useful ultra rare minerals, there would be mining rigs set up right now.

Your email address will not be published.