They did much worse
Please sir understand that this scene us silly on account of being a big tollywood movie , a drawn out scene of british strapping local leaders to cannon to blow holes in their hearts would have been too much for this kind of film
Wait until you hear they used to execute Indians by tying them to the business end of cannons and then firing said cannons. British """""""people""""""" are animals.
Wait until you hear they used to execute Indians by tying them to the business end of cannons and then firing said cannons. British """""""people""""""" are animals.
I'm not talking about whether or not they deserved to be executed, I'm talking about the method. It's cruel and unusual punishment. They could have been hanged, but I guess doing it with a cannon is a flex.
>Being blown to bits instantly by a cannon is definitely less painful than strangling on a noose.
you want child rapists to die quickly and painlessly rather than hang, choke and struggle while they think about what brought them to that situation? Are you a child rapist?
But it's so much effort and the gallows can only hang so many people at once... The cannons are right there man
And also when are you gonna get the opportunity to do that again
Wait until you hear they used to execute Indians by tying them to the business end of cannons and then firing said cannons. British """""""people""""""" are animals.
the sikhs had a decent say but they invited the british in to spite their own petty factional differences
off the top of my head there was also the brits beating Mysore withe the help of the Marathas who in turn the brits beat with the help of the Mahars
they still don't, India is very tribal, much like Iraq or Afghanistan. It's the West trying to impose its own ideas of a "nation-state" on countries that simply do not feel that way.
Any secular nation state rather than a blood-based nation state is a disaster, but it was Indians who wanted that shit. They didn’t even want the Pakistan partition.
>secular nation state
Contradiction in terms. The word "nation" derives from the Latin "natio" IE "to be born of" and refers specifically to a group of people with a shared heritage.
That we have corrupted the meaning of the word and redefined it does not change this fact, any more than defining "woman" as "a person who identifies as a woman" changes the biological nature of sex.
A nation is a group of people with a shared heritage. It is why the English-speaking states of the world remain so culturally and politically close, even after centuries of notional independence.
There's literally nothing wrong with this, it's just an efficient method of capital punishment.
Unless you can somehow prove that those men where somehow innocent of the charges they where accused of, I fail to see how this is any more egregious that being executed by firing squad.
>it's just an efficient method of capital punishment.
how is it efficient? you have to wheel the cannon over, load the cannon, tie them to the cannon, then clean up their limbs after.
>1 canon ball vs. 5 musket balls >then clean up their limbs after.
Lol why would you bother to clean up there limbs after? Maybe there family can do that, would be pretty fun to watch, but the soldiers aren't gonna waste time on that shit.
You don't clean up the limbs. The objective is to disintegrate the body so that it can't be given a proper funeral, denying the poor Indian the chance to sit at one of the many right hands of one of their moronic gods.
>A group of British officers and soldiers set out to the Bibighar to rescue the captives, assuming that they were still alive. However when they reached the site they found it empty and blood-splattered, with the bodies of most of the 200 women and children having already been dismembered and thrown down the courtyard well or into the Ganges.[21] Piles of children's clothing and severed women's hair blew on the wind and lodged in tree branches around the compound; the tree in the courtyard nearest the well was smeared with the brains of numerous children and infants who had been dashed headfirst against the trunk and thrown down the well.[21]
>conveniently ignores that the blood of the dead belonged to British women and children pajeets slaughtered
Remember Cawnpour. Fricking Afghan muslims went “this is too much” and died protecting British civilians from pajeet slaughter.
>Poop on the street, get blasted to sheet. You subhumans will learn to use the loo one way or another! >I will never use the loo you bloody ben chod basterd bi-*boom*ACK!!!
It's horribly sneaky that the British Government just allowed the EIC to rule a whole sub-continent with impunity just so they could maintain some distance and profess plausible deniability on a lot of atrocities.
Just last week I saw a bunch of Indians following around another indian, a homeless woman, picking up her used tissued and thinking she was an avatar of some subcontinental goddess, shut the frick up, they're vermin. Source on OP's film?
One of their own soldiers was nearly blown, he was saved in the last minute and later became a very famous military man, served in China, africa, and the American Civil War
>One wretched fellow slipped from the rope by which he was tied to the guns just before the explosion, and his arm was nearly set on fire. While hanging in his agony under the gun, a sergeant applied a pistol to his head; and three times the cap snapped, the man each time wincing from the expected shot. At last, a rifle was fired into the back of his head, and the blood poured out of the nose and mouth like water from a briskly handled pump. This was the most horrible sight of all. I have seen death in all its forms, but never anything to equal this man's end.
Obviously this is absurd unless that guy was a serial killer or something, in reality people don’t assault others randomly, (and keep in mind I said PEOPLE)
How big were its breasts? Did you kill it after or just threatened it into not tattling? Or were you able to stop it from realizing you were the rapist?
Yes, and divided India into two countries, aka Pakistan, so Sirs would be busy fighting pakis and not come kill England. We also can thank the britshits for Israel. They basically did same thing with Palestine in 1948. Almost all the world's current problems can be traced back to the british.
unfortunately correct.
1. want to impose something - but it would be rejected
2. create problems
3. the thing in 1. is put forward as a 'solution' to 2.
4. people accept/ask for 1. when they never would have accepted it otherwise.
typical tricks.
see that viral panic from a few years ago.
1. want to push mRna and increase control of the public, 2. release virus, lock people in their houses, prevent them from traveling, make them lose their jobs, stop them from socialising, 3. claim things will go back to normal if you submit, 4. some people submit.
they'll keep using it, and the more times you accept something, the more likely you are to accept the next.
india divided itself into two countries over friction between regions of majority muslim and majority hindu populations
the original plan had the lands controlled now by pakistan, bangladesh, and india in a single unified nation
it split up because you poos all fricking hate each other and after several centuries are completely unable to overcome your differences in a civilized manner
the great and evil british scheme of leaving people to their own devices and not having any input in later decisions whatsoever
Factually wrong. The British gave up on trying to satisfy everyone (which is apparently impossible) and turned the issue over to the UN. It was the UN who divided Palestine in 1948.
Hindus and Muslims hated each other. Sikhs were there too. None wanted to lvie in the same country as the others because none wanted to be governed by a heretic, and therefore unified governance, which is essentially what a country is, would be impossible if daddy Britain wasn't there to keep the various flavors of poos lined in a neat little shitting street.
Discussion centred on how the country was to be divided. Nobody could come to an agreement because each population wanted it divvied in the way that benefited them, if you go by population the minority would complain, if you didn't, the majority would complain.
If the Brits wanted them fighting they would have just left the blanda up and they would have been constantly fighting each other forever because there's no way in hell a Muslim was going to take orders from a Hindu, or vice versa. Sikhs were there too.
well the indians would still be at eachother's throats killing eachother wothout the british who were ulitmately the first to unify the subcontinent and establish india as a national concept so yes the brits did indeed frick up by creating the monstrosity
yes. parts of the british empire were reakly sick. If it wasn't for the Nazis and Belgian congo the brits would be seen as the most unrepetingly evil group of people ever to set foot on the earth.
they did it to white people to. Real sick fricks with god on their side.
I been pretty convinced white people isn't actually a thing. Im not saying "races" (bad name too, doesn't seem to be a thing, maybe species is a better term, who knows) are not real, but whites are not one. A blue eye nordic and a curly hair Mediterranean person are both considered "white", its pretty ridiculous.
whiteness as a concept historically expands and contracts based on perceived threats. you have the whites with money threatened by poor irish, spanish, polish, etc immigrants and the definition of white was very strict. the irish, spanish, polish, etc were "not white" until their native cultural traditions were eradicated or absorbed and a greater threat presented itself. this is why we're starting to see mexicans presented as white in america.
it may make more sense on a small scale. i put 10 americans in a room and they divide themselves by state, race, or college. i take those same 10 americans in a room with 100 chinese people and those 10 americans unite
Those are national and cultural definitions, not whiteness. No one ever said Irish "aren't white" they thought they were habitual drunks and that they would be more loyal to the Vatican than the US. Spare us the 1619 project pseudo history.
>If it wasn't for the Nazis and Belgian congo the brits would be seen as the most unrepetingly evil group of people ever to set foot on the earth.
nazis and belgian congo were both hoaxes
During the sepoy mutiny there were instance of atrocities by British troops where they would shoot mutineers in front of their families then order the families to clean up the blood by licking it all off the ground.
>Rebels confessing to or believed to be involved in the massacre were forced to lick the floor of the Bibighar compound, after it had been wetted with water by low-caste people, while being whipped.[23] The sepoys were then religiously disgraced by being forced to eat (or force fed) beef (if Hindu) or pork (if Muslim). The Muslim sepoys were sewn into pig skins before being hanged and low-caste street sweepers were employed to execute the high-caste Brahmin rebels to add additional religious disgrace to their punishment.[23] Some were also forced by the British to lick clean buildings stained with the blood of the recently deceased before being publicly hanged.[24]
kek
FRICK.
As a bong I missed out on the best times possible to be drafted/join the military, nowadays it's all brother wars.
Imagine being sent to a shithole country with "people" who couldn't even do shit back to you and be able to start your very own Dirlewanger Brigade and have a ton of fun. It's so fricking over. I hope there's a whole undiscovered continent out there we find in the next few years.
its likely that they did, and did so rightly
child rapists and murderers of innocents deserve nothing less than cruel torments
its a shame that the british only gave them quick deaths
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
>its likely that they did, and did so rightly
we are dealing with indians, race known for scams and lies. I dont believe them. but yes, they probably deserved it.
>Never managed
There was never an attempt to bring China under direct control
But the Chinese were never free to do as they please if it meant going against westerners, see the boxer rebellion and the opium wars for example.
The British could have even taken over China if they jad wanted to. The regular Han Chinese wanted them to because for them it'd just be a change of dynasty and they were already ruled by an ethnic minority. But the brits were already suffering enough trying to hold India together and they didn't want another situation like that so they refused and were dead set on commerce rather than political rule.
>The regular Han Chinese wanted them to because for them it'd just be a change of dynasty
you are dead wrong about that part but pretty much correct about everything else, the British broke China completely and could have easily taken it over but it simply wasn't worth the hassle, the British got what they wanted and it would have just been a headache trying to control the whole country as they were alot smarter and more organised than India, also when China has a rebellion they are fricking huge, the Taiping rebellion from a few years before the second opium war had a death toll estimated to be 20 million, very hard to control a country like that. meanwhile the British controlled all of India with only about 6000 british soldiers
>personally hand picks a stick from the side of the road >takes it into his hands to give it a brief, but intense lookover >even flips it over with a flourish to look at the whole thing >size, shape, nubs, degree of rot, all of these things he looks for to determine its desirability for colonial bashing >is it sound enough to send a colonial flying backwards, while being rotted enough to shatter with a satisfying crack, will it be strong enough to leave a lasting impression on the colonial, is it an appropriate tool to administer the mighty and terrible authority of the British Crown >despite the intense evaluation, he is done in less than a second >he has experience carrying out this grim (yet wholly necessary) task >with his impromptu sceptre in hand, he walks with brisk purposefulness over to the wayward colonial, maintaining all the dignity of an officer >confident in his tool of choice, he enthusiastically puts his entire body into the swing
What amazing attention to detail. I could watch this GIF over and over. Bravo.
Saaaar you don't understand! It was an amazing culturally and technologically developed country before the bloody bastard b***h brits and muslims destroyed it.
>Vice >"Sometimes." >Professor of Woman Studies, University of Michigan >Feminist, Women's Rights Activist >"We're here to find out, why women's social status in China is experiencing a backlash."
begging the question. lmao I ain't watching that bullshit.
>At Lahor I saw a most beautiful young widow sacrificed, who could not, I think, have been more than twelve years of age. The poor little creature appeared more dead than alive when she approached the dreadful pit: the agony of her mind cannot be described; she trembled and wept bitterly; but three or four of the Brahmens, assisted by an old woman who held her under the arm, forced the unwilling victim toward the fatal spot, seated her on the wood, tied her hands and feet, lest she should run away, and in that situation the innocent creature was burnt alive.[89]
>lthough it is debated whether it received scriptural mention in early Hinduism, it has been linked to related Hindu practices in the Indo-Aryan-speaking regions of India.
It's always "Aryans" who commit barbaric atrocities.
"English men" weren't a collective entity.
Good people, awful people an normies always existed.
Therefore you obviously had evil dogshit english men doing that and much worse things, good men who opposed that shit behavior and were decent with indians like they would be with other english people, and an ocean of normaies navigating life.
Same with indians. Or any other big group btw.
I love how Brits forced lower-caste indians to kill higher-caste rebels.
The rebels were absolutely malding that they were going to poo hell by the hands of a (from their pov) subhuman
>instead of food.
maybe they should have tried to buy food instead of eating the money
also other members of the empire had no problem growing cash crops AND food.
india is huge
idk just seems like low iq b***hing to me.
don't talk about IQ as if you have done anything in your damn life. the common policy was to grow cash crops or get punished harshly for not doing so. it was not muh free market, or muh economics. it was literally imposed to them by a foreign parasite.
>don't talk about IQ as if you have done anything in your damn life.
he said while posting on the Cinemaphile board of the anonymous image board called Cinemaphile. >. it was literally imposed to them by a foreign parasite.
maybe they should have had a bigger and better army instead of shitting in the street and drinking cow piss.
4 weeks ago
Anonymous
I am well aware I'm a frick up and chances are you are one too, that's why I don't talk about IQ.
The deep-seated racism between Indians makes sense when you visit it's coastal states. The country is a melting pot of cultures where everyone hates each other.
Idk why people of northern states are crass and violent, while the southern people are polite and well spoken.
>Idk why people of northern states are crass and violent, while the southern people are polite and well spoken.
not true btw >t. jeeta
northern indians are very rapey and violent but so are souther indians. the chill ones are the ones in north east and places like Sikkim
Yeah, they also did horrible things such as end slavery, end female genital mutilation, end literal human sacrifice, save hundreds of millions of lives by introducing health regulations and modern medicine... Absolutely nightmarish.
>all of these things still happen
They started happening again after the colonizers left, thanks for proving my point. >nope
That's just historical revisionism.
I'm not even british btw, just baffled by how little poojeets know about their own history. Even africans are generally thankful to their previous colonizers.
I know you streetshitters have difficulty understanding literally anything but you've basically just admitted that India was better under english rule.
Do other countries seethe and cope as much about their colonizer as the Indians do about the British? Like say do the Dutch live rent free in the heads of Indonesians?
They don't. In Africa, for example, there are states where the officials still wear german uniforms out of respect for their former "oppressors", and every time they get asked about it they praise them without end. As far as I'm aware indians are the only ones who actually fell for the myth that the brits (they are too uneducated to even know about the french and others) were violent monsters.
Yeah but that was also one of the major targets of soviet influences to turn the population against the west as a whole and become pro soviet instead. I don't think Indian was a major target for soviet propaganda and psyops. They psyopsed themselves
Zimbabwe seems to have rather unique circumstances though: a settler population that was large enough to be notable but, at the same time was relatively small - so it falls into neither the camp of somewhere like Australia on one end nor on the other somewhere like Gambia or Sri Lanka. Mentioning Zimbabwe makes me think of South Africa that has the whole aspect of the population not only being divided between the whites and non-whites (made even more complex by it not just being blacks but there also being the Coloured and Indian populations) but, how you also got the white population itself divided between the English-speakers and Afrikaans-speakers.
>As far as I'm aware indians are the only ones who actually fell for the myth that the brits (they are too uneducated to even know about the french and others) were violent monsters.
To be fair, I have met countless Indians who don't subscribe to the victim narrative and acknowledge and appreciate that the British had a net positive impact on India.
I hate Indians so fricking much it's unreal, I have to deal with these morons all day at my work, they are so fricking stupid, I genuinely think they will cause more damage to a nation in the long run than Black folk do
Do not let the perfidious Scotsman re-write history to absolve themselves of crimes and paint themselves as the victim.
The Scots were consistently over-represented in colonial leadership roles and colonial forces. But now they pretend they were all William Wallace Braveheart slaves being held down
Anon, this is from a film that thinks the British Empire controlled Brazil
Do other countries seethe and cope as much about their colonizer as the Indians do about the British? Like say do the Dutch live rent free in the heads of Indonesians?
Nah you can thank America and Russia. Brits had solved the Israel question in 1939 with their White Paper.
>It stated that with over 450,000 israelites having now settled in the mandate, the Balfour Declaration about "a national home for the israeli people" had been met, and it also called for an independent Palestine to be established within 10 years and to be governed jointly by Arabs and israelites:
>israeli immigration to Palestine under the British Mandate was to be limited to 75,000 over the next five years and then would depend on Arab consent:
Neville Chamberlain is one of the most derided men of history because he dared to go against the israelite insofar as he was able to. Zionists like Churchill basically crucified the poor fella.
the British protectorate of Palestine had been defending against terrorist attacks from them for decades when after ww2 america requested that the British pull out of Palestine and leave it for the parasites to ingest.
Yes and now they say sorry repeatedly while getting stabbed to death and sit on reddit while posting about how racist everything is and how their neighbour parked in front of their house on their street that has no designated parking spots
No. Most imperial powers are smart and know you don't want to cause needless trouble with your vassals. That's how they ever became an imperial power. The British exemplified the concept, their relationships were largely peaceful and symbiotic, built around trade. They only leveraged force when necessary, and usually through local warlords and friendly native powers rather than going it alone, which would be bad optics on top of doing it the hard way.
You show up, say you're going to run the show now, hand some people bags of cash to make them happy, and do everything in your power to look righteous and noble so the locals don't riot and rebel. You don't go around bashing women in the head for fun, those are tribal Black person antics.
Maybe the global south could spend 10 minutes picking up trash outside their domicile instead of crying about perceived injustices two centuries ago on the internet.
It's kind of ironic, because there's always this assumption that the overlord is less moral than the underling. But it's usually the case that the more righteous a society is the easier it is for it to dominate and defeat others, the overlordship is an inevitable consequence of their superiority.
>jews kvetch day and night about 6 million >native americans dont really say anything after having 150 million wiped from the face of the earth
must be genetic
What did Ancient India give us? It's probably a dumb question, but it feels like our historians and founders were too focused on sucking Roman wiener to really give Ancient India credit for anything. Same goes for the Greeks but at least they give those sodomites some faint praise.
India didn't give anything directly. Their culture simply spread throughout Asia and we got some filtered ideas home when Alexander conquered a portion of it.
That's why every brown larpagan has an obsession with aryanism
In all honesty letting some British colony's in the world be free was one of the Britain's biggest mistakes.
Can you honesty look me in the eye and say India is governed way better then that of when the British where in charge. No wonder most are feeing India to come to the UK because they miss us and beg for us to rule over them once again.
Doesn't matter anyway China will sort it out in the end
>Did white English men really do this to innocent Indian people?
they literally killed 100 million indians
that's more than the people killed in holocaust
they killed more people than stalin
they killed more people than mao
they killed more people than during slavery
they killed more people than during colonization of americas
even if you combine every casualty during WW2, that's still more than that.
bongoloids killed so many people...and yet they got away with it.
Loving the seethe and larping of all the mayo monkeys out here where in reality an Indian is the head of UK rn and British women come in spades in India to take drugs and Indian wieners up in their holes in order to achieve nirvana regularly
The only thing that got shitted on was white people's legacy as all these Black folk and pajeets infiltrate your spaces and make you the most cucked race in the world kek
Yeah.
b***h probably rolled a 7 or 8 in Jumanji
had it coming.
Very VERY specific bait.
heehehe
esoteric
tubular
No one deserves to lose The Game.
yes, but there's no gang rape afterwards because he's not indian.
They did much worse
Please sir understand that this scene us silly on account of being a big tollywood movie , a drawn out scene of british strapping local leaders to cannon to blow holes in their hearts would have been too much for this kind of film
Thats fricked up but it would be pretty kino...
>local leaders
They broke their oaths to the British. They knew what the consequences were.
now explain why they did it
Because English people are monsters?
I'm not talking about whether or not they deserved to be executed, I'm talking about the method. It's cruel and unusual punishment. They could have been hanged, but I guess doing it with a cannon is a flex.
The execution method was invented by indians.
source, sirs?
Being blown to bits instantly by a cannon is definitely less painful than strangling on a noose. The Official Table of Drops wasn't until 1886.
>Being blown to bits instantly by a cannon is definitely less painful than strangling on a noose.
you want child rapists to die quickly and painlessly rather than hang, choke and struggle while they think about what brought them to that situation? Are you a child rapist?
But it's so much effort and the gallows can only hang so many people at once... The cannons are right there man
And also when are you gonna get the opportunity to do that again
Wait until you hear they used to execute Indians by tying them to the business end of cannons and then firing said cannons. British """""""people""""""" are animals.
thats nothing compared to having to smell indian people
now imagine the smell afterwards
and plus they have to clean it up.
the anglos weren't the smartest bunch were they?
indians came and cleaned it up for them obviously
damn it's crazy that the indians sold their own country out to the brits dsspite knowing they do things like this
Well the brits really just wrestled control away from the mugals, the indians had little say in the matter
the sikhs had a decent say but they invited the british in to spite their own petty factional differences
off the top of my head there was also the brits beating Mysore withe the help of the Marathas who in turn the brits beat with the help of the Mahars
Spoiler: it was an extremely unusual punishment for mutiny. The Indian statelets did far worse to each other as standard.
India wasn’t a country until 1947. They didn’t consider each other the same nation before that.
they still don't, India is very tribal, much like Iraq or Afghanistan. It's the West trying to impose its own ideas of a "nation-state" on countries that simply do not feel that way.
Any secular nation state rather than a blood-based nation state is a disaster, but it was Indians who wanted that shit. They didn’t even want the Pakistan partition.
You can be a secular ethnostate, moron.
>secular nation state
Contradiction in terms. The word "nation" derives from the Latin "natio" IE "to be born of" and refers specifically to a group of people with a shared heritage.
That we have corrupted the meaning of the word and redefined it does not change this fact, any more than defining "woman" as "a person who identifies as a woman" changes the biological nature of sex.
A nation is a group of people with a shared heritage. It is why the English-speaking states of the world remain so culturally and politically close, even after centuries of notional independence.
There's literally nothing wrong with this, it's just an efficient method of capital punishment.
Unless you can somehow prove that those men where somehow innocent of the charges they where accused of, I fail to see how this is any more egregious that being executed by firing squad.
>it's just an efficient method of capital punishment.
how is it efficient? you have to wheel the cannon over, load the cannon, tie them to the cannon, then clean up their limbs after.
>how is it efficient?
You can sell tickets
>1 canon ball vs. 5 musket balls
>then clean up their limbs after.
Lol why would you bother to clean up there limbs after? Maybe there family can do that, would be pretty fun to watch, but the soldiers aren't gonna waste time on that shit.
You wouldn't even need to load a cannon ball
You don't clean up the limbs. The objective is to disintegrate the body so that it can't be given a proper funeral, denying the poor Indian the chance to sit at one of the many right hands of one of their moronic gods.
The indians will take his limbs and put it in their curry. They'll thank the saars for it.
>you have to
My Indian servants have to*
They did that after the Sepoy mutiny to monsters who had tortured children.
SHUD YUO BLOODY UP b***h
guess who they adopted it from
All they had to do is poop in the lavatory.
These pajeets were child rapists
Some things never change.
ctfu
Very humane m
Well, Indians still burn people for witchcraft
Oh no, those poor literal child rapists.
>A group of British officers and soldiers set out to the Bibighar to rescue the captives, assuming that they were still alive. However when they reached the site they found it empty and blood-splattered, with the bodies of most of the 200 women and children having already been dismembered and thrown down the courtyard well or into the Ganges.[21] Piles of children's clothing and severed women's hair blew on the wind and lodged in tree branches around the compound; the tree in the courtyard nearest the well was smeared with the brains of numerous children and infants who had been dashed headfirst against the trunk and thrown down the well.[21]
death by cannon was too good for them, should have made the savages suffer more
>Reddit version of said events
>posts a screenshot from reddit while calling someone else reddit
Can't believe how fricking dumb you are
Clearly I couldn't have looked up that passage and one of the top results was a hot Reddit take I went to look at for laughs
Clearly you're a dumb street shitter
That entire website is just an elaborate chinese brain washing machine to ensure the destruction of the west
so you're telling me this house of chuds is the last bullwark of western civilization ? perhaps I misjudged the value of impotent seething.
saaaaaaaar
>conveniently ignores that the blood of the dead belonged to British women and children pajeets slaughtered
Remember Cawnpour. Fricking Afghan muslims went “this is too much” and died protecting British civilians from pajeet slaughter.
>Poop on the street, get blasted to sheet. You subhumans will learn to use the loo one way or another!
>I will never use the loo you bloody ben chod basterd bi-*boom*ACK!!!
Based. East India Company movie would be awesome.
>East India Company movie would be awesome.
Pirates of the Caribbean
It's horribly sneaky that the British Government just allowed the EIC to rule a whole sub-continent with impunity just so they could maintain some distance and profess plausible deniability on a lot of atrocities.
Just last week I saw a bunch of Indians following around another indian, a homeless woman, picking up her used tissued and thinking she was an avatar of some subcontinental goddess, shut the frick up, they're vermin. Source on OP's film?
>Source on OP's film?
RRR saar
Won't she just reincarnate or something?
So what's the problem?
What a way to go.
Electric chair? Gas-chamber? Hanging? Firing squad?
Frick that shit, strap me to a cannon and make me go boom!
In the grand scheme of bad things that have happened on planet earth, that is nothing
Does this not damage the cannons in any way? I would've thought blocking the business end and firing could cause some internal damage
>instant death
Yes it would've been a horrific spectacle, but what's the problem? They weren't anymore savage than anyone else, just more advanced.
One of their own soldiers was nearly blown, he was saved in the last minute and later became a very famous military man, served in China, africa, and the American Civil War
I wish I could have witnessed it live.
>innocent
>he says, defending a continent of shit eating savages
>One wretched fellow slipped from the rope by which he was tied to the guns just before the explosion, and his arm was nearly set on fire. While hanging in his agony under the gun, a sergeant applied a pistol to his head; and three times the cap snapped, the man each time wincing from the expected shot. At last, a rifle was fired into the back of his head, and the blood poured out of the nose and mouth like water from a briskly handled pump. This was the most horrible sight of all. I have seen death in all its forms, but never anything to equal this man's end.
He did the needful, she was trying to scam his vehicle.
Obviously this is absurd unless that guy was a serial killer or something, in reality people don’t assault others randomly, (and keep in mind I said PEOPLE)
People do violence to each other for weird ass reasons all the time, why would this be such a stretch?
He redeems himself later in the movie.
oh does he kill her eventually?
he does the needful and realizes that india is best saar
Was the British Raj just English nobility driving around stinky shitty hindu cities? What's the appeal?
The appeal was that tea and spice trade made ass-loads of money and India had plenty of them
That's nice!
I suppose as an artgay I should save this for reference ...
You definitely should. Art is important
>innocent Indian people
No such thing
>innocent
>indian
>People
epbp
Probably. Brits were wild n fun in the olden times. Amazing such an ugly dumb batch did so much.
She's a mohammedan trying to fix the tire so she can go can a hindu temple and he's trying to stop her.
Heroic, really.
I raped an pajeeta girl I work with. Shit was cash. She would have had sex with me willingly, but I wanted the struggle.
How big were its breasts? Did you kill it after or just threatened it into not tattling? Or were you able to stop it from realizing you were the rapist?
Same I had sex with a fat pajeeta when I was doing my masters degree, she was so horny we did it 3 times before sending her home
Yes, and divided India into two countries, aka Pakistan, so Sirs would be busy fighting pakis and not come kill England. We also can thank the britshits for Israel. They basically did same thing with Palestine in 1948. Almost all the world's current problems can be traced back to the british.
based British playing chess as you muslims and poojeets play checkers
So, being invade by muslims and poojeets was part of your plan?
no, they are being brought in by israeli interests to wind up the population until we are all begging for a final solution to the shared muslim issue
unfortunately correct.
1. want to impose something - but it would be rejected
2. create problems
3. the thing in 1. is put forward as a 'solution' to 2.
4. people accept/ask for 1. when they never would have accepted it otherwise.
typical tricks.
see that viral panic from a few years ago.
1. want to push mRna and increase control of the public, 2. release virus, lock people in their houses, prevent them from traveling, make them lose their jobs, stop them from socialising, 3. claim things will go back to normal if you submit, 4. some people submit.
they'll keep using it, and the more times you accept something, the more likely you are to accept the next.
Brb need to carve another checkerboard into the chest of some brit twink
india divided itself into two countries over friction between regions of majority muslim and majority hindu populations
the original plan had the lands controlled now by pakistan, bangladesh, and india in a single unified nation
it split up because you poos all fricking hate each other and after several centuries are completely unable to overcome your differences in a civilized manner
the great and evil british scheme of leaving people to their own devices and not having any input in later decisions whatsoever
If the British really wanted to divide up the subcontinent they could have fairly easily created both an independent Assam and Dravida Nadu.
Factually wrong. The British gave up on trying to satisfy everyone (which is apparently impossible) and turned the issue over to the UN. It was the UN who divided Palestine in 1948.
>It was the UN who divided Palestine
who knew nothing of the issue and just said frick it, king Solomon this b***h
Hindus and Muslims hated each other. Sikhs were there too. None wanted to lvie in the same country as the others because none wanted to be governed by a heretic, and therefore unified governance, which is essentially what a country is, would be impossible if daddy Britain wasn't there to keep the various flavors of poos lined in a neat little shitting street.
Discussion centred on how the country was to be divided. Nobody could come to an agreement because each population wanted it divvied in the way that benefited them, if you go by population the minority would complain, if you didn't, the majority would complain.
If the Brits wanted them fighting they would have just left the blanda up and they would have been constantly fighting each other forever because there's no way in hell a Muslim was going to take orders from a Hindu, or vice versa. Sikhs were there too.
>Did white English men really do this to innocent Indian people?
Yes the poor thing. All she wanted to do was be thrown onto her dead husbands funeral pyre and those mean British stopped her.
well the indians would still be at eachother's throats killing eachother wothout the british who were ulitmately the first to unify the subcontinent and establish india as a national concept so yes the brits did indeed frick up by creating the monstrosity
>indian
>people
>c**tfricker
O-our response crust buster sisters?
yes. parts of the british empire were reakly sick. If it wasn't for the Nazis and Belgian congo the brits would be seen as the most unrepetingly evil group of people ever to set foot on the earth.
they did it to white people to. Real sick fricks with god on their side.
Well they are, why do you think actual white people call them "Eternal Anglos"?
Brits created the term "white people". You have some serious /misc/ brain rot
Frick pol, don't lump me in with those frickers.
They're pedophobic as frick
>hates brits
>calls other people evil
>is a pedo
lol
I been pretty convinced white people isn't actually a thing. Im not saying "races" (bad name too, doesn't seem to be a thing, maybe species is a better term, who knows) are not real, but whites are not one. A blue eye nordic and a curly hair Mediterranean person are both considered "white", its pretty ridiculous.
whiteness as a concept historically expands and contracts based on perceived threats. you have the whites with money threatened by poor irish, spanish, polish, etc immigrants and the definition of white was very strict. the irish, spanish, polish, etc were "not white" until their native cultural traditions were eradicated or absorbed and a greater threat presented itself. this is why we're starting to see mexicans presented as white in america.
it may make more sense on a small scale. i put 10 americans in a room and they divide themselves by state, race, or college. i take those same 10 americans in a room with 100 chinese people and those 10 americans unite
Those are national and cultural definitions, not whiteness. No one ever said Irish "aren't white" they thought they were habitual drunks and that they would be more loyal to the Vatican than the US. Spare us the 1619 project pseudo history.
hello israelite
It's obvious you both only have a limited knowledge of history
>we didnu nuffin m8
>strawman
>If it wasn't for the Nazis and Belgian congo the brits would be seen as the most unrepetingly evil group of people ever to set foot on the earth.
nazis and belgian congo were both hoaxes
Hopefully
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jallianwala_Bagh_massacre
yaawwwwwwwnnn
who cares
During the sepoy mutiny there were instance of atrocities by British troops where they would shoot mutineers in front of their families then order the families to clean up the blood by licking it all off the ground.
So what?
>Rebels confessing to or believed to be involved in the massacre were forced to lick the floor of the Bibighar compound, after it had been wetted with water by low-caste people, while being whipped.[23] The sepoys were then religiously disgraced by being forced to eat (or force fed) beef (if Hindu) or pork (if Muslim). The Muslim sepoys were sewn into pig skins before being hanged and low-caste street sweepers were employed to execute the high-caste Brahmin rebels to add additional religious disgrace to their punishment.[23] Some were also forced by the British to lick clean buildings stained with the blood of the recently deceased before being publicly hanged.[24]
kek
FRICK.
As a bong I missed out on the best times possible to be drafted/join the military, nowadays it's all brother wars.
Imagine being sent to a shithole country with "people" who couldn't even do shit back to you and be able to start your very own Dirlewanger Brigade and have a ton of fun. It's so fricking over. I hope there's a whole undiscovered continent out there we find in the next few years.
Speak the Kings English or die, motherfrickers
what the shit is this
portrait of the king
clearly.
Gott Strafe England
The more I learn about br*ts the more the nazis looked like the good guys.
I'm so glad seeing England turn browner with each generation.
because of things you didn't even see
sounds liek masturbation machines and electric floors. Got any proof of this happening?
its likely that they did, and did so rightly
child rapists and murderers of innocents deserve nothing less than cruel torments
its a shame that the british only gave them quick deaths
>its likely that they did, and did so rightly
we are dealing with indians, race known for scams and lies. I dont believe them. but yes, they probably deserved it.
Why did no one tell me the Bongs were this based?
When you study the native people and religion in order to be more racist
Honestly pretty disgusting, just shoot them
The is appropriate punishment for people who massacred women and children.
more truck attacks in bongland please
Yes because they are jealouse of other countries teeth
Thank god the Anglos never managed to conquer China. Imagine how bad the caste system/victim complex would be.
They did capture Hong Kong and it still makes chinks buttmad to this day even though they already reclaimed it
What? We essentially did. We burned down the Summer Palace.
Didn't the hms nemesis win the war almost single handedly?
>we
Frick outta here Burger
Hong Kong was by far the best place in China for precisely that reason. Singapore is civilised for the same reason.
Hong Kong is the most outdated major city right now. The infrastructure is not even close.
>Never managed
There was never an attempt to bring China under direct control
But the Chinese were never free to do as they please if it meant going against westerners, see the boxer rebellion and the opium wars for example.
The British could have even taken over China if they jad wanted to. The regular Han Chinese wanted them to because for them it'd just be a change of dynasty and they were already ruled by an ethnic minority. But the brits were already suffering enough trying to hold India together and they didn't want another situation like that so they refused and were dead set on commerce rather than political rule.
>The regular Han Chinese wanted them to because for them it'd just be a change of dynasty
you are dead wrong about that part but pretty much correct about everything else, the British broke China completely and could have easily taken it over but it simply wasn't worth the hassle, the British got what they wanted and it would have just been a headache trying to control the whole country as they were alot smarter and more organised than India, also when China has a rebellion they are fricking huge, the Taiping rebellion from a few years before the second opium war had a death toll estimated to be 20 million, very hard to control a country like that. meanwhile the British controlled all of India with only about 6000 british soldiers
>ricecell doesn't know about the century of humiliation
>personally hand picks a stick from the side of the road
>takes it into his hands to give it a brief, but intense lookover
>even flips it over with a flourish to look at the whole thing
>size, shape, nubs, degree of rot, all of these things he looks for to determine its desirability for colonial bashing
>is it sound enough to send a colonial flying backwards, while being rotted enough to shatter with a satisfying crack, will it be strong enough to leave a lasting impression on the colonial, is it an appropriate tool to administer the mighty and terrible authority of the British Crown
>despite the intense evaluation, he is done in less than a second
>he has experience carrying out this grim (yet wholly necessary) task
>with his impromptu sceptre in hand, he walks with brisk purposefulness over to the wayward colonial, maintaining all the dignity of an officer
>confident in his tool of choice, he enthusiastically puts his entire body into the swing
What amazing attention to detail. I could watch this GIF over and over. Bravo.
I say, golly good post my man.
Well spotted old chap.
It's a bot
>NOOOO, LET ME BURN ALIVE ON THE FUNERAL PYRE OF MY DEAD HUSBAND WHO I MARRIED WHEN I WAS 7!!!!
Lol
why are jeets pretending like they weren't as misogynistic as muslims before bongs colonised them?
Saaaar you don't understand! It was an amazing culturally and technologically developed country before the bloody bastard b***h brits and muslims destroyed it.
That's what you get for worshipping the devil.
>worshipping the devil.
Qrd?
indian culture be like
kek chinks and poos are the same kind of rarted
>we only want strong boy children
>wtf why are there no girls for our sons to frick
It's difficult for their minds to grasp abstract ideas like the future.
chinks are especially fricked lmao
>Vice
>"Sometimes."
>Professor of Woman Studies, University of Michigan
>Feminist, Women's Rights Activist
>"We're here to find out, why women's social status in China is experiencing a backlash."
begging the question. lmao I ain't watching that bullshit.
my favourite one is where they force women to burn themselves alive if they survive their husbands
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sati_(practice)
>At Lahor I saw a most beautiful young widow sacrificed, who could not, I think, have been more than twelve years of age. The poor little creature appeared more dead than alive when she approached the dreadful pit: the agony of her mind cannot be described; she trembled and wept bitterly; but three or four of the Brahmens, assisted by an old woman who held her under the arm, forced the unwilling victim toward the fatal spot, seated her on the wood, tied her hands and feet, lest she should run away, and in that situation the innocent creature was burnt alive.[89]
>lthough it is debated whether it received scriptural mention in early Hinduism, it has been linked to related Hindu practices in the Indo-Aryan-speaking regions of India.
It's always "Aryans" who commit barbaric atrocities.
indians are not innocent nor people.
>Did white English men really do this to innocent Indian people?
I certainly hope so!
"English men" weren't a collective entity.
Good people, awful people an normies always existed.
Therefore you obviously had evil dogshit english men doing that and much worse things, good men who opposed that shit behavior and were decent with indians like they would be with other english people, and an ocean of normaies navigating life.
Same with indians. Or any other big group btw.
Sounds like WOKE NONSENSE to me!
>Sounds like WOKE NONSENSE to me!
YES, my fellow transbian, YES
I prefer cherry picking a few examples over 200 years of history and pretending it like that all the time
>you obviously had evil dogshit english men
that's what OP said -- english men, the rest of the adjectives are superfluous and redundant
Yes.
They also did it to every other kind of people, including other British.
I love how Brits forced lower-caste indians to kill higher-caste rebels.
The rebels were absolutely malding that they were going to poo hell by the hands of a (from their pov) subhuman
India already had one of worlds first universities and brits killed like 100 million indians and impoverished the country through taxes.
not true at all you moronic shitskin
they forced indian farmers to grow cash crops instead of food. it's literally in history books you clueless chuds.
>instead of food.
maybe they should have tried to buy food instead of eating the money
also other members of the empire had no problem growing cash crops AND food.
india is huge
idk just seems like low iq b***hing to me.
>also other members of the empire had no problem growing cash crops AND food.
How many potatoes does it take to kill an Irishman?
17 pounds of potatoes
don't talk about IQ as if you have done anything in your damn life. the common policy was to grow cash crops or get punished harshly for not doing so. it was not muh free market, or muh economics. it was literally imposed to them by a foreign parasite.
>don't talk about IQ as if you have done anything in your damn life.
he said while posting on the Cinemaphile board of the anonymous image board called Cinemaphile.
>. it was literally imposed to them by a foreign parasite.
maybe they should have had a bigger and better army instead of shitting in the street and drinking cow piss.
I am well aware I'm a frick up and chances are you are one too, that's why I don't talk about IQ.
good boy 🙂
>innocent
?
Why did Britian like India so much?
They didn't like India, they liked the tea and the curry sauce.
The marathas are not welcome
The deep-seated racism between Indians makes sense when you visit it's coastal states. The country is a melting pot of cultures where everyone hates each other.
Idk why people of northern states are crass and violent, while the southern people are polite and well spoken.
>Idk why people of northern states are crass and violent, while the southern people are polite and well spoken.
not true btw
>t. jeeta
northern indians are very rapey and violent but so are souther indians. the chill ones are the ones in north east and places like Sikkim
>north east
bengal? lol no. they arent any better
Yeah, they also did horrible things such as end slavery, end female genital mutilation, end literal human sacrifice, save hundreds of millions of lives by introducing health regulations and modern medicine... Absolutely nightmarish.
>end slavery
>end female genital mutilation
> end literal human sacrifice
all of these things still happen
>save hundreds of millions of lives by introducing health regulations
nope
Jeez are Bongs really this indoctrinated?
>all of these things still happen
They started happening again after the colonizers left, thanks for proving my point.
>nope
That's just historical revisionism.
I'm not even british btw, just baffled by how little poojeets know about their own history. Even africans are generally thankful to their previous colonizers.
>uhm actually, my country is still terrible today! take that, country who has it a lot better!
What a great comeback.
>Straight up lies
>Gets called out
"uhh uhh well that mean I w-win"
Pathetic.
>brits arrive
>do the things I've mentioned
>brits leave
>things I've mentioned come back
>"see, they never did anything!"
Dumb poojeet.
>rehashes exact same argument still with no evidence.
Yeah man that'll work out great irl lmfao
stfu moronic shitjeet
I know you streetshitters have difficulty understanding literally anything but you've basically just admitted that India was better under english rule.
I know indoctrinated white boys difficulty understanding literally anything but if you actually read the thread the exact opposite was implied lmao.
That doesn't even make sense. Indoctrinated by who? Other white people? Think before you type because you're already on the ropes in this thread.
Because the white folks left.
Once you meet an Indian in real life you realize that the British were far too nice to them
Colonisation was terrible. They came to the country and built hospitals, schools, railroads and sewage systems!
Do other countries seethe and cope as much about their colonizer as the Indians do about the British? Like say do the Dutch live rent free in the heads of Indonesians?
>Like say do the Dutch live rent free in the heads of Indonesians?
it's not rent free though is it.
They don't. In Africa, for example, there are states where the officials still wear german uniforms out of respect for their former "oppressors", and every time they get asked about it they praise them without end. As far as I'm aware indians are the only ones who actually fell for the myth that the brits (they are too uneducated to even know about the french and others) were violent monsters.
>They don't.
That's not true at all, Zimbabwe is an African country that hated their colonisers
Yeah but that was also one of the major targets of soviet influences to turn the population against the west as a whole and become pro soviet instead. I don't think Indian was a major target for soviet propaganda and psyops. They psyopsed themselves
India was a target, Yuri bezmenov was stationed in India to try and stir up unrest and spread Soviet propoganda
And look how that worked out for them
Zimbabwe seems to have rather unique circumstances though: a settler population that was large enough to be notable but, at the same time was relatively small - so it falls into neither the camp of somewhere like Australia on one end nor on the other somewhere like Gambia or Sri Lanka. Mentioning Zimbabwe makes me think of South Africa that has the whole aspect of the population not only being divided between the whites and non-whites (made even more complex by it not just being blacks but there also being the Coloured and Indian populations) but, how you also got the white population itself divided between the English-speakers and Afrikaans-speakers.
>Zimbabwe is an African country that hated their colonisers
no one cares about some landlocked shithole
>Zimbabwe
Tge frick is Zimbabwe? You mean Rhodesia?
>As far as I'm aware indians are the only ones who actually fell for the myth that the brits (they are too uneducated to even know about the french and others) were violent monsters.
To be fair, I have met countless Indians who don't subscribe to the victim narrative and acknowledge and appreciate that the British had a net positive impact on India.
Where did you meet these Indians? In the West or in Indian itself?
In the West lol, definitely a selection bias at play there
Not everyone
>we could have saved these savages if it wasn't for ((them)) getting in the way
>if it wasn't for ((them)
The allies?
the zionist occupied goverment of the united states of amerigoylems
why do you think they forced their "allies" to abolish their colonies and import their populations?
>Like say do the Dutch live rent free in the heads of Indonesians?
The Indonesian version of the expression "give them an inch and they'll take a mile" is "like a Dutchman taking land".
If that gives you an idea
>Like say do the Dutch live rent free in the heads of Indonesians?
Yes, they do.
t. Dutchman that visited Indonesia recently.
Total Jeet Death
>Indian
>people
I don't believe you
No, but they should have
>innocent
>people
>Indian
Everyone knows that belongs to Bangladesh
I hate Indians so fricking much it's unreal, I have to deal with these morons all day at my work, they are so fricking stupid, I genuinely think they will cause more damage to a nation in the long run than Black folk do
>NOOOOOO YOU CAN'T FORCE US TO NOT BURN OUR WIVES AND SLAVES ON OUR FUNERAL PYRES REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Remember, brits are just vickings larping as sophisticated pepole
>English
BRITISH
Do not let the perfidious Scotsman re-write history to absolve themselves of crimes and paint themselves as the victim.
The Scots were consistently over-represented in colonial leadership roles and colonial forces. But now they pretend they were all William Wallace Braveheart slaves being held down
Anon, this is from a film that thinks the British Empire controlled Brazil
I hope so
I like how he inspects the log to make sure it's of top poo-smacking quality.
You can thank the British for Israel's existence
Nah you can thank America and Russia. Brits had solved the Israel question in 1939 with their White Paper.
>It stated that with over 450,000 israelites having now settled in the mandate, the Balfour Declaration about "a national home for the israeli people" had been met, and it also called for an independent Palestine to be established within 10 years and to be governed jointly by Arabs and israelites:
>israeli immigration to Palestine under the British Mandate was to be limited to 75,000 over the next five years and then would depend on Arab consent:
Neville Chamberlain is one of the most derided men of history because he dared to go against the israelite insofar as he was able to. Zionists like Churchill basically crucified the poor fella.
the British protectorate of Palestine had been defending against terrorist attacks from them for decades when after ww2 america requested that the British pull out of Palestine and leave it for the parasites to ingest.
It was the correct choice. Shame France went rogue and didn't give up their shit because Vietnam might've been partially averted that way.
look up shittavara incident. British officer force d100 innocent indians to take a bath. much worse
No, blatant hoaxes.
Yes and now they say sorry repeatedly while getting stabbed to death and sit on reddit while posting about how racist everything is and how their neighbour parked in front of their house on their street that has no designated parking spots
No. Most imperial powers are smart and know you don't want to cause needless trouble with your vassals. That's how they ever became an imperial power. The British exemplified the concept, their relationships were largely peaceful and symbiotic, built around trade. They only leveraged force when necessary, and usually through local warlords and friendly native powers rather than going it alone, which would be bad optics on top of doing it the hard way.
You show up, say you're going to run the show now, hand some people bags of cash to make them happy, and do everything in your power to look righteous and noble so the locals don't riot and rebel. You don't go around bashing women in the head for fun, those are tribal Black person antics.
No, but they should have.
Why do brown people think I want them airing their ethnic grievances on my internet?
Cinemaphile is 90% global south now b***h get used to it
Maybe the global south could spend 10 minutes picking up trash outside their domicile instead of crying about perceived injustices two centuries ago on the internet.
This attitude is becoming mainstream in Canada
the angloid cant hide his blood lust for long
They eventually realise you can't educate an 80IQ pajeet
bad luck for you subhuman scum, we conquered the whole fricking world, how quickly you morons forget
What's happening in Canada?
it's over run with shitskins and the whites there are finally starting to realise diversity ain't so great
The ~~*WEF*~~ flooded their country with over a million pajeets at once on top of their already unsustainable immigrantion.
Now Canadians are waking up and realising their streets are covered in shit they can't afford the rent and food prices have skyrocketed
Severe housing shortage + importing a million rural indians a year
>Indians
>Innocent
don't use my oshi for your shitpost Black person
It's kind of ironic, because there's always this assumption that the overlord is less moral than the underling. But it's usually the case that the more righteous a society is the easier it is for it to dominate and defeat others, the overlordship is an inevitable consequence of their superiority.
>innocent Indian people
>Indian
>people
No. Its just a victimization complex that non-Whites have. Victimhood is a powerful currency in Western civ. Thanks, israelites!
Why would I give a shit about what happens to indians?
Yeah, that's why its hard to feel bad for them when so many pajeets come to the UK.
I hope so.
>still no toilet witch kino
why do Indians cry about the partition when it was Indians who decided on how it should be partitioned and the Brits just enforced it?
White English men did it to lots of innocent non-Indian people too.
>innocent
>jews kvetch day and night about 6 million
>native americans dont really say anything after having 150 million wiped from the face of the earth
must be genetic
it's too hard to say anything when you drink and take drugs all day
This is so racist, omgosh, I hope this person got publicly ostracized for publicly acknowledging this issue.
Ancient India not just Ancient Rome and Greece were great civilizations and were cradles of humanity, art and science as well.
What did Ancient India give us? It's probably a dumb question, but it feels like our historians and founders were too focused on sucking Roman wiener to really give Ancient India credit for anything. Same goes for the Greeks but at least they give those sodomites some faint praise.
India didn't give anything directly. Their culture simply spread throughout Asia and we got some filtered ideas home when Alexander conquered a portion of it.
That's why every brown larpagan has an obsession with aryanism
No. But we honestly should have done that and more.
In all honesty letting some British colony's in the world be free was one of the Britain's biggest mistakes.
Can you honesty look me in the eye and say India is governed way better then that of when the British where in charge. No wonder most are feeing India to come to the UK because they miss us and beg for us to rule over them once again.
Doesn't matter anyway China will sort it out in the end
Having most of their economic profits not end up on a shitty island halfway across the world means they're probably better off now yeah
But the economic profits are now terrible because they're all moronic and wallow in shit.
>white man is evil for the sake of evil
When will this shit end.
Meant to reply to
Good.
I love pajeetas so much bros it's unreal
more. plus I can't find ones without a brown dude plowing there pooh spots
no it's anti western propaganda
Evil white english made indians and pakistani hate each other, seers.
It's like leaving a upper-decker in someone's house before you head out.
>Did white English men really do this to innocent Indian people?
they literally killed 100 million indians
that's more than the people killed in holocaust
they killed more people than stalin
they killed more people than mao
they killed more people than during slavery
they killed more people than during colonization of americas
even if you combine every casualty during WW2, that's still more than that.
bongoloids killed so many people...and yet they got away with it.
Unfortunately there's 1.5 billion of you shitstains so our real crime was failing to erase you from the planet
Would love to see the reactions from Brits from the 19th century after they walk down a street in London today.
Shitting up another country isn't really a point of pride, but I'll allow it due to them being Angl*s.
Stop shitting the streets and in rivers. Maybe you'll get some sympathy, Pajeet.
Not enough. The only good Indian is a dead Indian.
what has DEI forced down my throat done to me that I literally laughed out loud when watching that gif, even though i've seen it before?
>all these turd worlders seething in this thread
God I miss the days when the internet was white.
>Finally free from British rule to prosper!
>Finally. The barbarity is over. Our civilized nation can thrive.
>We will finally have dignity.
>Colonizers begone! We don't need you imposing your customs on us!
(I hear all of this in Apu)
>We can handle our country very well on our own, dank you so very much.
Loving the seethe and larping of all the mayo monkeys out here where in reality an Indian is the head of UK rn and British women come in spades in India to take drugs and Indian wieners up in their holes in order to achieve nirvana regularly
The only thing that got shitted on was white people's legacy as all these Black folk and pajeets infiltrate your spaces and make you the most cucked race in the world kek
Keep the Bongbitches. Run a train on them.
I see how you poos do that.
Ain't the poos. It's the Joos.
That's a different thread.