>directs kinos
>directs the best breaking bad episodes
>kills a dying franchise (star wars)
how can one man be this based?
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>directs kinos. >directs the best breaking bad episodes. >kills a dying franchise (star wars)
He's a crying b***h on twitter and his wife is ugly as sin
But how the frick did he pocket $100M for ruining Star Wars and got away with it?
Because admitting fault would damage the brand, and whoever admits fault automatically forfeits all earnings. Same goes for whoever accuses anyone of fault.
You could film Mark Hamill taking a shit for 90 minutes, slap the Star Wars name on it, and hundreds of millions of morons will pay to see it.
Well the thing is, they did that, and people didn't like it.
But when they don't, your type comes out of the woodwork to say "Ha! Gotim! Filtered!"
He is based but he actually tried to save Star Wars, and then JJ Abrams came and shat all over the place, being afraid that he actually had a good story to work with thanks to Rian
1/10 bait, have a nice day tr00n
JJ killed star wars, Rian failed at making a good movie
Man this blows my mind.
How can any human in the universe mistake the fact that TLJ single handidly destroyed that trilogy.
How is it fricking possible.
How can anyone misunderstand what star wars stands for to such an epic degree?
>No it was JJ!! ...Who successfully introduced a bunch of characters into a new story.. with infinite possibilities for chapter 2.
>handidly
>Who successfully introduced a bunch of characters into a new story
They were all terrible and annoying
>with infinite possibilities for chapter 2
I disagree, he had just cloned some characters and story from the OT and everyone hated it. All he was left with was an obvious ESB story clone, he tried to shake it up as much as he could but failed.
>Only thing possible was an ESB clone
This only proves you're dumb and unimaginative.
Think.
Why is it possible for you or I to be able to write a better script then the teams of fricking morons did if you gave either of us 4 minutes?
Defending mediocrity is one thing.
Defending mind blowingly fricking stupid character development that destroys a 40 year story line is nothing short of the Biggest disappointment in cinema history.
>This only proves you're dumb and unimaginative.
This is literally what Rian was left with. Rey is about to be trained by Luke (like Luke and Yoda), the not-Empire is bearing down on the Rebellion again, the not-Emperor wants to convert Rey to the dark side, the not-Vader clone is tasked to capture not-Luke but he has some good in him. He was left with the most unoriginal shit ever, and people rightfully shit all over TFA for not having any originality to it, so he was forced to shake it up somehow.
>Defending mind blowingly fricking stupid character development that destroys a 40 year story line is nothing short of the Biggest disappointment in cinema history.
Ahh so your one of the morons whose biggest criticism was that Luke wasn't space Superman.
Yeah dude i am mad, you got one chance in life to bring back Luke and this is what we got.
Its shit like this. You guys have to go out of your way to be this stupid.
TFA was fine.
It copied THEMES.. ON PURPOSE.. and set up infinite possibilities.
Again
My dick could come up with a better story in 3 minutes.
You know what? Here we go
>Luke is Too advanced- like dr Manhattan, all who die turn into the force anyways, who cares, why would i get involved with causing pain
>Rey Actually has a challenge now, remind luke what its like to be human
>Later in movie Luke has to fight kylo and the nights in a 7 on 1.. luke remembers his humanity, hesitates to kill his old students and kylo kills him.
>Introdue rey being a palpatine early, wala we have kylo being born bad and turning good, and rey being the yang to his ying.
>Also go with The proud latino pilot with jedi reflexes being impressed by the granduer of the empire and going evil - as JJ clearly teased
All this fricking shit at the top of my Head.
Nothing like ESB.
I dont want to hear anyone suggest TLJ isnt the worst movie ever.
>It copied THEMES.. ON PURPOSE..
This is supposed to justify it?
Also Disney would reject your script because we need more planets to explore and some cuddly little creatures to sell toys.
They would introduce a subplot where Finn had a long lost Stormtrooper lover who was taken from the same home planet as him, so he goes home and there's all these cute zebra like animals there he rides around on and him and his former lover have to stop the corrupt local mayor from being re-elected in a rigged election.
That was ultimately the kind of shit that ruined the franchise.
i dont think cuddly creatures even sell toys, this is a boys franchise and they want space fighters and lightsabers. I mean how much have lego made over the years selling lego x wings
>i dont think cuddly creatures even sell toys
How can you be this ignorant lmao
Ewoks and Porgs were introduced solely for toy sales.
And despite a few instagram posts, failed.
Baby Yeed is also a huge fricking sensation and even people who don't like Star Wars that much buy his pillows and plushies
And they weren’t even expecting that. It took them months to get merchandise out.
Ya know, because the people in control of Star Wars have no fricking idea what they’re doing.
Not him, but yeah, you're right that it was shit. Ultimately, not the worst case scenario for the first film in the franchise, because at least it gives you a set up. Nothing spectacular but a decent setup nevertheless.
Were people's expectations about the sequels met, across the board? Not really. Were they subverted? Sure.
Robocop 3 subverted me with the ninja cyborgs. I did not see that coming. Was it superior to the first film? Not particularly.
>Robocop 3 subverted me with the ninja cyborgs. I did not see that coming. Was it superior to the first film? Not particularly.
Actually it's superior in every way, manchild.
People weren't basedfacing when they saw the ninja cyborgs, and that means it was real cinema. Real art is about suffering.
>I dont want to hear anyone suggest TLJ isnt the worst movie ever.
I think most people would find that opinion rather silly and attempt to gently suggest that perhaps you take Star Wars too seriously.
you give star wars fans a bad name my man
Okay rian
Okay Satan Rian.
>Defending mind blowingly fricking stupid character development that destroys a 40 year story line is nothing short of the Biggest disappointment in cinema history.
>a bloo bloo the OT heroes were sad and that made me feel sad so WRITING BAD fricking RUIN Johnson RAPED my childhood REEEEEEE
grow up sperg
>do NOT criticize, do NOT question, only nod and consoom
>a bloo bloo it hurts my precious little feefees that the OT heroes faced adversity in middle age so WRITING BAD
might I suggest growing up, finding a job?
>a bloo bloo please don't criticize my favorite director for his lukewarm ideas, don't you realize that subversion is good in and of itself and always useful?
might I suggest growing up, finding a job?
>don't you realize that subversion is good in and of itself and always useful?
It's not bad writing simply because it upsets you that the OT heroes didn't live the rest of their lives in perfect sunshine and rainbows. Ironically you call me a consoomer but the only people who actually think like this are braindead consoomers who just wanted dumb fanservice shit like pic related
No, you just think anything that isn't immediately recognizable as fan service is passable as the work of an auteur.
>Marlon Brando suggested he be a floating donut in Superman, that must mean the guy would've made for a good writer
You can subvert expectations and have it work well for the story. Or it can simply not work. And "fanservice" is still preferable to giving the middle finger to fans, or much more accurately, to the concept of continuity.
JJ gave the franchise to some random guy called Rian Johnson he saw selling hotdogs on the streets. So he is to blame for the absolute abysmal failure that the movie was as well.
I mean, I guess I'm assuming he was the one who decided that. But really WHO DECIDED THAT. Did they think ESB's success was due to it being the second movie in a trilogy directed by someone who was not the first movie's director?
Did an AI make that decision?
>JJ gave the franchise to some random guy called Rian Johnson
>I mean, I guess I'm assuming he was the one who decided that
You have no idea how movies are made do you, lmao
morons like you blame JJ and Rian because you think they're "the guy in charge of everything" when really it's just the whole process that fricked up. The original Star Wars trilogy were made out of love and because Lucas had a story to express in a cool way. The sequels were made because everyone knows Star Wars and if you threw money at a director they'd end up with a two hour product that millions of people will watch, no matter how bad it is. That's ultimately the problem with these movies.
>You have no idea how movies are made do you, lmao
Not really. Seems like a really boring process nowadays
I don't blame one singular person for the mess that was the franchise, I just blame everyone really
> The original Star Wars trilogy were made out of love and because Lucas had a story to express in a cool way
I know, my comparison to them was just the choice of picking the second movie to be directed by someone different. Was it really a coincidence or were we supposed to drawn the parallel. And if so, it feels like a very artificial connection, like it was thought out by an algorithm "The second movie of star wars made huge success. It was directed by someone other than george lucas, the first movie director. Yes. That is the formula for success"
TFA ruined Star Wars
Nah, TFA is good, TLJ got rid of what was dumb about TFA while doubling down on what was good about it to make kino
>TFA is good
>ugh...dae notice that TFA had an xwing and a death star in it? LITERALLY SAME MOBIE
Hey bow, Rey was charismatic as hell and totally not a Mary Sue.
>TFA is good
can't imagine being this wrong
TFA locked the Sequel Trilogy into being a "Rebels vs Empire redux" and killed the Jedi Order off again. All TLJ did was make that more apparent to the morons that thought there was potential in that set-up.
Okay rian
TFA was good, but it felt very much like a kids movie, it wasn't at all suitable for adults. Star Wars 77 kind of had stuff that appealed to adults and kids. Obi Wan getting chopped in half after knowing him half the film was a big deal. morons will disagree with me but Han Solo's death had nowhere near as much impact for me as Alec Guiness.
yeah the characters feel very bland to me. Maybe all except Finn.
Despite being very kiddy and a little lame/cringe at times, I was excited for the next film. But it was a disjointed mess that jumped all over the place. At least in my opinion. I mean they had an opportunity to make something new and different, and I would've been fine with that. What they made even had potential, but was just waaaay too much.
Also in the og movies, things like space fighters and cruisers, spaceports, hyperspace, all the general fluff of that universe just felt way more believable to me. In TLJ I almost laughed out loud when they had the special magnifying glass to spot the rebel ships
>yeah the characters feel very bland to me. Maybe all except Finn.
Finn is one of the worst, any potential his character has is killed by the end of the movie.
>rejects war and indiscriminate killing
>later joins the Rebellion and kills his further comrades with glee and Black person whooping
>seems to be trying to impress Rey by pretending to be a Rebellion fighter? Seems to be romantically attracted to her?
>defies orders and leads a big rescue attempt at the end for her
>.... but doesn't actually express any emotion or try to kiss her
I get absolutely where you are coming from but I still think he was one of the better done ones, its only in the second half that he really falls apart (in TFA).
They should've done it like, he is desperate to get away from the adventure, but eventually realizes running away isn't the answer, and has to face his fears. But he needed to be a coward throughout, instead of letting him murder Phasma or a dozen other soldiers. I would've appreciated a story about a coward who wants to run away but by the end saves the day and gets the girl.
It was also a HUGE mistake in my opinion to destroy the starkiller base. They should've kept that thing around for all three films as a constant presence controlling the galaxy. That would've been an interesting change from blowing up the death star twice in the original films. Make it so that attack fails, then it comes after them in the next film.
I think even from the beginning Finn was off, him pretending to be a rebellion leader was just plain weird, like some modern day rom-com where the main male character is pretending to be someone important.
I don't think Death Star 2.0 could be saved either.
JJ wrote broad characters with no actual gameplan for the future, that's on him and has always been his problem.
i don't think he's as great as his fans say he is nor is he some horrible monster that killed star wars like the SW nerds would have you believe. dude is just a competent director with a varied body of work, some good, some bad.
>i don't think he's as great as his fans say
Does he actually have fans? He made just one noteworthy movie (Looper) before becoming known as the guy that fricked up the sequels
i mean you see a lot of people step out to defend him on twitter, i think he's just an okay director that took on the impossible task of shaking up a storied sci-fi franchise, with his creative choices being either misunderstood or totally unsuccessful depending on who you talk to.
>browsing twitter
>taking the opinions of twitter schizos and bots seriously
opinion discarded
yeah because everyone here is well adjusted and not posting garbage constantly right, lmao
At least this site is somewhat self-aware.
To answer seriously, I think a lot of people underestimate probable studio meddling in the trilogy, JJ and Rian Johnson are both capable of making decent films, but there's this weird thread of terrible quipshit dialogue, introducing settings for no reason and other stuff throughout these movies. Just very commercial products with focus groups and product merchandising clearly front and centre. Certainly with RoS they must have given JJ a mandate to retcon a lot of RLJ, so the entire movie is spent backtracking and without anything of substance reintroduced.
Also they probably should have got a real scriptwriter for the movies, for TFA and JJ especiall,. so it actually set up the trilogy properly. It's weird how they discarded that decent initial script for RoS in favour of more braindead JJ shit.
Knives Out was great
Stop making sense
I want to read ridiculous hyperbole from fanboys
i guess I would say he's a talented/okay director and has clearly done some decent tv stuff, but I've never really got what people see in the movies he's done, especially Knives Out.
I think with star wars he was just out of his depth and his work was exposed to many more people than usual, who were more critical than his usual audience
>I dont think he's some monster who destroyed star wars
Then you dont know what the frick you're talking about.
He might have had decent movies, before, but i dont give a shit.
Do you have any idea how badly you have to frick up.. to not hit an 11/10 movie with the return of the most beloved character in cinema history?
Do you have any idea how badly you have to frick up to make a 7/10 movie with those circumstances?
Rian hit a fricking 2/10 movie
And all time shocking, are you psychotic, incredible 2/10
He is the quintessential case of a feminine kid who thought he was smarter than other people, making an attempt at a space epic with deeper meaning and depth.
His level of depth was "omg war profiteering happens"
It fricking blows my mind anytime anyone suggest it isnt the single worst movie ever.
doesn't really track with me since i don't have any emotional investment in star wars, you do obviously. not my problem.
>with the return of the most beloved character in cinema history?
Luke? lmao no. He's not even the most beloved character in his own trilogy, Han is.
You're obviously just butthurt that Luke wasn't the amazing Jesus-like character the Star Wars comics made him out to be.
Most people agree the Luke/ Rey stuff are pretty much the only salvageable parts of TLJ. It's everything else that's objectively worse, like Poe leading a mutiny because Holdo couldn't be bothered to tell anyone her plan and Finn and Rose going to Space Monte Carlo and fricking up the capitalist scum there.
>Most people agree the Luke/ Rey stuff are pretty much the only salvageable parts of TLJ
lmao
It's true. Do you think anything about Finn and Rose's adventure could have been redeemed?
Finn and Rose being boring characters doesn't automatically make Luke and Rey stand out, just because it's muh Mark Hamill.
Ironically enough, I've seen TLJ fanboys try to make fun of the Mandalorian's handling of Luke for similar reasons. When in reality all it really did was get the basic concept of continuity right.
>When in reality all it really did was get the basic concept of continuity right.
No, your sole engagement with Luke Skywalker is as an action figure doing videogame shit to the point that he can be easily replaced by a stuntman in a deepfake helmet
And your sole engagement with Luke Skywalker is a passionate hatred for the videogame/toy biproduct to the point where you think him walking around with a giant dildo in his ass is expert craftsmanship.
Yeah because Luke walking around with a dildo in his ass is a totally accurate description of his role in TLJ and you're not all a histrionic manchild crying that your epic childhood hero made a mistake and he didn't kill enough bad guys with his lightsaber
> he didn't kill enough bad guys with his lightsaber
At least he came close to killing his own nepwhew, as a Jedi does, and then fricked off for 30 years living as a hobo. It's in line with the established way of the Jedi. As is doing practically anything but harm a single bad guy in the movie. I agree though, those droids in the Mandalorian probably had women and children.
>ronically enough, I've seen TLJ fanboys try to make fun of the Mandalorian's handling of Luke for similar reasons.
Yeah because that moment was fricking awful, it was pure soiface pandering of "OMG IT'S CGI LUKE HE'S BACK!". I don't think I'll bother watching Mandalorian S3 now that they're trying to hamfist le ebin Jedi shit into the series, the initial joy of the show was that it didn't have that stuff.
If you really enjoy that stuff maybe post on Reddit with the other soifaces.
mando s1 is great because it has nothing to do with skywalker/jedi/palpatine mythos shit
I'm so disappointed by Disney fricking that up, it's the only nuwars media I actually enjoyed and they had to ruin it.
The people running Star Wars seem to have no fricking idea how to tell a story. It's funny how they made a bunch of Mandalorian spinoffs because their logic seemed to be "hmm people like Mandalorian because it's a Star Wars TV SHOW and not a Star Wars MOVIE. We need to make more TV shows instead of movies and people will love them because of Mandalorian!"
Still, that was the reason the Porgs were introduced. That's the idea.
Yes, they tried and failed, because they have zero idea what they’re doing.
Your issue is with Luke Skywalker as a character, not "the moment", or whatever. You prefer the person in TLJ.
But here's what I'm trying to communicate to you. That person is a different character. Some character you would prefer to learn more about perhaps, but not Luke Skywalker.
>You prefer the person in TLJ.
Not really, it was still a poorly executed concept but had potential.
>That person is a different character. Some character you would prefer to learn more about perhaps, but not Luke Skywalker.
Yes. And there is nothing wrong with this, it's a sequel series made forty years after the OT, making Luke a different character is not ludicrous.
>it was still a poorly executed concept
The concept in and of itself isn't bad. I would go as far as to say it can have excellent potential. If one were to do their research on what exactly they're trying to apply this concept on, that is.
>it's a sequel series made forty years after the OT
And? That changes nothing. Make it a thousand years. The character is established as X thing by the end of the movie. At the start of the next one, he reverted back to Y thing, or a whole new thing altogether, that isn't in line with what has been shown throughout the character's development.
I'm completely genuine when I say I would've been alright with the prospect of Luke being a spice addict on top of being a hermit. Give him more reasons to be this way. Kill his wife. Mara Jade was never all that original anyway.
In the end, he considers murdering his nephew in cold blood, when he outright refused to do the same to his father who was a literal child murderer with a vice grip on the galaxy, and then he can't recuperate from this event for 30 years.
Not even trying to establish any contact with his own sister.
>The character is established as X thing by the end of the movie. At the start of the next one, he reverted back to Y thing, or a whole new thing altogether, that isn't in line with what has been shown throughout the character's development.
This isn't an argument, having him regress is fine in itself, clearly you just don't like it because it's heckin' Luke and he's a badass.
>he considers murdering his nephew in cold blood
Yeah considers it, and immediately regrets it.
>when he outright refused to do the same to his father
He didn't outright refuse, he almost did it. He considers it for a longer time and a lot more forcefully than he did with Kylo.
>Not even trying to establish any contact with his own sister.
The mother of the child he considered killing, yes. I would probably do something similar.
>clearly you just don't like it because it's heckin' Luke and he's a badass.
He spends the original trilogy slowly becoming X person, through blood sweat and tears. Then he reverts to someone who is lesser than that, over an obstacle of milder challenge.
That in itself pushes a person's concept of disbelief more than a flying Princess Leia (I actually liked that ridiculous scene btw)
>Yeah considers it, and immediately regrets it.
But simply talking about it, like he did with his father, who was for all intents and purposes a fricking psychopath at that point in time, is a big no no.
>He considers it for a longer time and a lot more forcefully than he did with Kylo.
Yes, but he was growing into the Jedi he would eventually become, and he was assaulting an opponent who had the upper hand on him by presumption. Most people to this day argue that Vader could've beaten Luke but didn't want to, due to being torn on his son.
> I would probably do something similar.
So you would abandon your own sister because her kid turned up with the wrong crowd and became rotten? That's not something everyone would do, but certainly not a Jedi. And that's the core issue here. If any person in Star Wars is established as a poster child for being a Jedi, going through the hero's journey, and so forth, it's Luke Skywalker.
Because he's actually one of the more competent directors out there. Not many anymore
He directed the best and worst episode of Breaking Bad. People who like Fly are nerds and pretentious gays.
The last 10 minutes of Fly make it one of the best.
Fly is kino. I bet you liked the machine gun bullshit and think the cringe cartel stuff is the best part of BCS
LOL pseud detected
>it was boring therefore it must be art
Fly is boring dogshit. BCS has consistent drama with or without action scenes. Don't worry anon, it's okay to say boring things are boring.
Fly is the first time Walt is actually left to grapple with the fallout of his actions and is forced to both introspect and offer some kind of apology to Jesse for what he's done
If you think it's "boring" you're just moronic. But I bet you love 5b because it was EPIC when Mr. White scienced the SHIT out of that car and killed the Nazis with his machine gun xD
There are far more creative ways to do that than having Walt make an increasingly bigger fool of himself trying to whack a fly in increasingly cartoonish ways.
People rave about this Fly episode but I never really regarded it as being anything other than a comedy slice of life type episode.
Call me a moron but if there was some incredibly deep message about Walt being responsible for his actions I completely missed it.
I don't get the insane butthurt over it, it's really bizarre.
It's just a simple episode. It's actually a good way of advancing Walt and Jesse's relationship, bringing up Jane again, exploring Walt's deep depression and self-loathing. It was the kind of stuff that could only be done without action, it wouldn't make sense to bring up Jane again in almost any other setting, even the way Walt tells Jesse he killed her at the end is pretty contrived.
I dont think it was boring, just calmer. I think it was good to have an episode like that before shit went down with the next three episodes.
People retroactively pretending it was the best episode of the world is kind of moronic tho.
the fly episode is far and away the worst episode of the entire series
dude shut up and go back
Why? Just because it was a bottle episode and not much went on in it besides some dialogue doesn't make it the worst. I really never got why it's such a polarizing episode to people. It was one of my faves because I like the playoff between Jesse and Walt in an intimate setting but I get if you think it's boring. To think Worst episode ever is perplexing though
>watched knives out
>cringe anti white signaling
how the frick did he go from looper to this? his other films are decent but it's like he was so assblasted about his star wars film he took it out on characters in his script
Last Jedi is the best of the Disney shit
Frick you JJ
Rogue One*
star wars dies when empire strikes back came out fight me
In a big complicated process where most of the decisions were made wrong, the buck stops with the most influential person who could have changed course. That's probably whatever that kennedy lady is who signs director man's paychecks. She should have stepped in and said that Star Wars was getting stupid or delegated someone with an ounce of common sense to do so.
But she didn't, and this guy was closer to the action, so yeah he probably owns a big chunk of the blame for taking a huge shit on the franchise. He was certainly in a position of authority for the worst of it.
I think Knives Out pretty much established him as a corporate product Hollywood insider man with zero artistic merit or storytelling ability who can make cash for the kennedy b***hes of this world.
I really enjoy his stuff
Kind of wish he hadn't got involved with Star Wars at all because you can't discuss anything he does without Star Wars tards shitting all over the thread
>shills his shit here
That’s all he’s really done.
I saw Brick in the theater during its original run. I still have the little glossary they put in the lobby. Esquire in Chicago.
Rian Johnson is an butthole.
Reminder: if you see someone here defending rian johnson, chances are, it’s rian johnson. He’s been shilling his shit here since brick.
Nah, it's people who were treated to a half baked interesting concept, and because modern cinema is so bad, they considered it impressive enough.
I would say he's a competent director on a technical level. As a writer, not really.
Nah, it’s rian johnson. He and his movies have been a plague on this board since brick.
No it's not. Fallacies like this just give people more reason to believe TLJ is the greatest pleb filter of all time.
It would be unrealistic of me to say Rian is a terrible director. Rather, his ideas were not for this film, and if he absolutely had to direct something Star Wars, it may as well have been Kenobi, that could allow some of those concepts to work in a more universally appealing manner.
But the thing with Rian is, he has said since time immemorial that he likes to make films that have a polarizing effect on the audience.
So yes, this was all deliberate. I guess he considers such a thing a win.
Okay rian.
I'm not Rian. I'm arguing against his ideas ITT.
I think what Rian was going for is interesting and daring on paper, and has been done much better by superior writers. Simple as that.
The very first thing I'd change and improve the movie would be to give Luke's arc to someone else.
Okay rian.
Reverse-psychology doesn't work on me.
I'm still not a fan of the film.
Okay rian
this copy pasta bullshit is getting boring
It's not a pasta. I did not like the TLJ in terms of it's writing, with a few exceptions. I'm being as fair and objective as possible.
Ultimately, the whole negative impact of the ST could've been softened if, at the very least, the trilogy had been given to ONE fricking director and writer, be it Rian or Jar-Jar or AT LEAST have a cohesive pre-planned structure and general plot outline.
Because if ST fans can agree with me on something, it's most likely that the films are disjointed from one another.
Okay rian
take em
the last jedi was a terrible sequel, it felt like the last movie of a trilogy instead of the middle movie, it killed star wars momentum, those are all facts
Why did everyone apparently hate that Asian women in that film? Never saw it so I don't get it
Okay rian
Okay rian
Well the thing about TLJ is, I think it could've been better if Rian spent more time researching Star Wars and thinking it through.
His confidence and selfish desire in making a polarizing film was what played him a bad joke. I think he could've revitalized Star Wars, not Jar Jar Abrahams. Although Jar Jar is adequate enough at doing set ups, and of course, playing into fanservice, although I don't care about this much.
The thing is, the """"fanservice""" in Mando happens to coincide with who the character of Luke Skywalker is. So if that's fanservice and the soys will be agape, so be it. It's at least true to the character.
Okay rian
It's not ok at all man. It's not ok. Look at the world around you. Look at the price of potatoes.
Oka rian
We’ve had this same shitty thread with the same shitty replies/arguments every hour since TLJ released. There is nothing to be said, nothing to be salvaged. It’s just low-effort trolling to generate “demand expressions” for Star Wars, to pretend it still has value as an IP after Disney did what was thought to be impossible and RAN IT SO FAR INTO THE FRICKING GROUND EVEN PROFESSIONAL SPELUNKERS COULDN'T EXTRACT IT.
You're just terminally online. Get a job or whatever.
Okay rian.
I've never seen Knives Out, but looking at the poster and the cast, I can't help but think it's rancid shit.
Okay rian
based rian bumping his thread
Okay rian
Okay rian
Okay rian
what alternate fantasy land are you in?
the sequels were utter shit
just
bawwww