Disney is pulling the plug on Tinkerbell. RIP 1953-2024

Disney is pulling the plug on Tinkerbell.

RIP 1953-2024

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Not Cinemaphile

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Tinkerbell
      >not Cinemaphile

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Looks like a real person in op to me

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Still a cartoon character.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        This thread isn't about Tink. It's about bashing Disney and the values of "The Left".
        This thread is NOT Cinemaphile.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          So it's about Tinkerbell and the company that created her most recognizable depiction. You're just unhappy with the reaction and want to shut it down.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            I'm tired of these shit threads and all the shit crossboarders.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous
    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >unrealistic body image
      I'm convinced that this is just jealous b***hes and people pandering such trying to make people women feel bad for being hot. And I definitely mean "women," because no one calls depictions of men "unrealistic" even when they look like the most roided-out beastman you've ever seen.

      >a character prominently known from a classic animated movie
      >not Cinemaphile
      Then literally what is?

      Source? Not that I couldn't believe it but I don't care what the trannies on twitter are saying, I want it straight from the Vermin's syphilitic sore-ridden mouth.

      Dude trust me.

      The publication's name is right in the screenshot.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >make people women
        God damn, I need to up my proofreading...

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >And I definitely mean "women," because no one calls depictions of men "unrealistic" even when they look like the most roided-out beastman you've ever seen. And they have women regularly try to dry hump and paw anyone from The Prince to Gaston.

        Don't hear much about that Cept from the Cast members that have to deal with it.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm convinced that this is just jealous b***hes
        It's almost always jealous ugly and/or fat b***hes behind this kind of shit. Pretty women don't give a shit, they literally dress up as these kinds of characters.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm convinced that this is just jealous b***hes and people pandering such trying to make people women feel bad for being hot. And I definitely mean "women," because no one calls depictions of men "unrealistic" even when they look like the most roided-out beastman you've ever seen.

        What gets me is that I when I see stuff like He-Man get brought up as kind sexist, I've seen women call it a "power fantasy". Okay, then is dressing up as fricking Stripperella a power fantasy then?!

        If it's belittling to somebody than don't fricking try and sugar coast it

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Okay, then is dressing up as fricking Stripperella a power fantasy then?!
          Yes, because women use their sexuality to make men do whatever they want. That's their power. So being hot is the power fantasy.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            That's why so many female fighters use whips

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        You can't talk about cosplayers in Cinemaphile.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Unpopular opinion but I think the Tinkerbell from "Fox's Peter Pan and the pirates" was the best one
        the one from the 90s anime is probably the worst by far design wise, plus all the pirates on that show looked like proto One Piece characters

        Stunning and brave

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Gonna take a lot of people clapping to make this version to fly again.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Parkshit threads belongs on Cinemaphile but mods refuse to kill/move them.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Who tf goes to Cinemaphile?
        It's a ghost town of a board.
        Barely clears 20 posts an hour on a good day

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >Disney parks are all based on Cinemaphile properties
        >not Cinemaphile

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          There is always some seething junior mod (likely a troony too) trying to patrol this board. They come and go. Dont mind them.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Just give her a bulge and facial hair. It’ll be fine.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      The fact this is a fp bot shows that it is and the israelites are scared.

  2. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Why post then?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Nobody asked dipshit.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Because you're a homosexual.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      You cared enough to post here.

  3. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >It's real
    >It's in Disney "WORLD" and not Land (yet)
    You've got to be fricking kidding me

  4. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    An unrealistic body image that's been easily portrayed by 20 something women for the last 70 years?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Blue hair wails mad that a woman is both nice in manner and attractive.

      Guess they rather watch more brawls

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >Tinkerbell
        >a woman who got so jealous she had Wendy SHOT and almost fall to her death
        >nice in manner
        What Disney is doing is bullshit but C'MON anon.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >nice in manner
        stop thinking with your balls anon, she was awful in peter pan (haven't seen her 3d movies though)

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Being a fricking sphere is an unrealistic body image and yet ham planets expect us to tolerate that shit.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >unrealistic
      they really hate normal women dont they

      its crazy how these "people" think
      telling girls they cant be pretty or princesses
      to not take care of their body but instead to hurt themselves

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      New tinkerbell will be fat and wearing pants

  5. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Source? Not that I couldn't believe it but I don't care what the trannies on twitter are saying, I want it straight from the Vermin's syphilitic sore-ridden mouth.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Dude trust me.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Source? Not that I couldn't believe it but I don't care what the trannies on twitter are saying, I want it straight from the Vermin's syphilitic sore-ridden mouth.

        If this is real, and I have no reason to believe it is real and not just more outrage farming, it's probably more likely due to the rampant sexual harassment like what happened to the Jasmines and that one Gaston.

        >The move from Disney comes after it confirmed her disappearance from meet-and-greets at the resort in February.

        >Tinker Bell has reportedly faced scrutiny from Disney’s Stories Matter team ahead of the debut of Disney+ in 2019. The team reportedly flagged and labeled the character to Disney executives as "potentially problematic," claiming that she is “body conscious” and “jealous of Peter Pan’s attention,” according to a 2022 report from The New York Times.

        >Disney’s Stories Matter team was developed to spot and correct “negative depictions of people and cultures” in Disney’s products.

        >“We are reviewing our offerings beyond the screen, which include products, books, music and experiences,” reads the Stories Matter homepage on Disney’s website. “While advisories for negative depictions of people and cultures may be added to some offerings, others will be reimagined. We are also investing in new ways to better reflect the rich diversity of stories in our world. This work is ongoing and will evolve as we strive toward a more inclusive tomorrow.”
        https://www.thestreet.com/travel/disney-world-cuts-classic-character-from-meet-and-greets-amid-scrutiny

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >faced scrutiny from Disney’s Stories Matter team
          is this the same team that censored the Life of times of Scrooge McDuck for being racist?

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            >is this the same team that censored the Life of times of Scrooge McDuck for being racist?
            Yes! After everything Disney has done and how they treat originality (especially when they chose Bob Iger from chosen people again), it's time to boycott that evil and corrupt company of today called Disney!
            If necessary, burn that company to the ground! Boycott Disney! Boycott!

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            Fricking miserable c**ts.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          These people are mentally ill.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            It's an excuse. They want to get rid of older characters for more newer ones from Pixar and CG movies.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Disney’s Stories Matter team
          Sounds like a pretty good grift. You just keep making up the next "problem" in line and you're never out of a job.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Imagine getting paid to b***h about what bothers you. And 99% of those complaints are just rephrasing "good character is too skinny, too attractive, too white" and "bad character is too fat, too ugly, and too brown," with the solution being "make good characters fat, ugly, and brown" and "make bad characters skinny, attractive, and white."

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            How the frick do I get this job?

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              https://storiesmatter.thewaltdisneycompany.com/

              Look at the film critics group in the bottom who make up the board. Try to parasitise one of those.

              >AAFCA encourages diversity and inclusion within the film and TV industry with a particular emphasis on the Black experience.

              > CAPE champions diversity by educating, connecting and empowering Asian Americans

              > Define American uses media and the power of storytelling to shift the conversation about immigrants

              >The Geena Davis institute is the only research-based organization working collaboratively within the entertainment industry to create gender balance

              > GLAAD is a dynamic media force rewriting the script for LGBTQ acceptance, provoking dialogue that supports cultural and narrative change

              > Hollywood, Health & Society (HH&S) is a program of the USC Annenberg Norman Lear Center that informs and inspires accurate storylines on topics including health and medicine, social justice,

              >IllumiNative increases the visibility of Native Nations and peoples in American society and challenges existing negative narratives.

              >The National Association of Latino Independent Producers stands as the premier Latinx media organization, addressing the largest ethnic minority community in the country.

              “largest ethnic minority” pick one.

              > RespectAbility fights stigmas and advances opportunities so people with disabilities can fully participate in all aspects of community.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Tinkerbutt

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Ironically Tinkerbell's body type is popular now so her body consciousness is a non issue.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous
          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            nice straw moron

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            No lie detected.

            nice straw moron

            Just because it leaves out some subtleties with its brevity, doesn't mean it's not true.
            moron.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              I'm sorry, clearly moron was too much of a compliment to you, I meant to say braindead

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >to you
                You seem to be under the mistaken impression that I was the anon you called a moron in the first place.

                You know what happens when you assume, right?

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            >white people go around for 1000 years killing and dominating the world
            >now they cry about wokeism and make cartoons because movies have women and black ppl in them

            master race lmao

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              >white people go around for 1000 of years spreading civilization to savages
              >Black folk and shit skins are allowed some power and ruin centuries of civilization

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                wow, you're moronic

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                That anon is a frogposter, that goes without saying

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            >prequelgay complaining about the franchise being ruined
            Ahahahahaha
            Now you know what it's like
            You deserve to suffer

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Do little girls really think about this stuff? If I was showing a kid Peter Pan, Tinkerbell being "problematic" wouldn't cross my mind at all... Tinkerbell also has her own media independent from Peter Pan, correct?

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Female brains are wired differently from male brains.

            When a guy sees an awesome guy, he thinks “Hell yeah. Literally me!”.

            When a girl sees a beautiful girl, she thinks “Stupid c**t! She’s not the pretty one! I AM! Only people who look exactly like ME are attractive!”.

            The Ancient Greeks actually wrote about this. How in a society ruled by women all men would be forced to frick ugly women first and pretend they’re just as attractive.

            Ever notice how females CONSTANTLY give each other bullshit compliments? Like they will call legit burn victims and deformed abominations and whales “Gorgeous”? But if you compare them in seriousness “Wow. You look JUST LIKE that troony you called beautiful a hour ago!” they get offended? It’s like that.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Bot post, bait or moronic?

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              This stuff has been parroted so much, yet it always gets proven wrong when the numbers and actions come out.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          What the frick is going on where fricking Tinkerbell and Doctor Suess books are called "inappropriate" and get banned but homosexuals selling rainbow-colored dicks in front of kids is A-OK?

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            >selling rainbow-colored dicks in front of kids
            Where? I haven't seen this one

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Happens during gay pride events in some places. But followup belongs straight to pol. Unless you're looking to buy a rainbow dick, in which case I suggest Bad Dragon as a starting point.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            not that other anon but
            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11517503/Dean-Chicago-school-says-students-shown-dildos-butt-plugs-teaching-queer-sex.html

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              A lot of sex ed expansions in general are jaw droppingly weird to me now.
              Like in the mid 10s you basically had
              >"Changes in your body"
              >The reproductive system
              >Protection
              >Birth control methods
              >STI education and when to get checked
              >Discussing consent and boundaries
              Admittedly, I feel weird about sex toys because the general gist of sex ed is "Look, we know you're gonna do it, we're showing you safety then we all get to go home"
              So I can definitely see how teaching kids about sex toys, particularly those designed for insertion, is important considering the number of hospital stories there are regarding this. At the same time, I feel like that's a matter of just showing the object on the desk and some infographics

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >At the same time, I feel like that's a matter of just showing the object on the desk and some infographics
                For that, it should be more like a shop class safety video showing the various injury types that are possible.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                I'd add size chart sheets too. For instance, the vegana can take a lot, it is built to do that but if we're talking someone who wants to try anal insertion, that's a different story.
                That's the hard part about sex ed in the post internet era. There's more and more stuff that teens wanna try because they have more knowledge of it than in previous generations, and in turn, teaching the safety prodedures becomes more and more awkward.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              If someone brought butt plugs and dildos to my high school we would have gone crazy and I guarantee they would have been stolen and used for pranks

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              Heterosexual attractive women =LE EVIL INSTRUMENT OF THE PATRIARCHY
              >Fat blag nonbinary gay buttplug using homosexuals are le heckin wholesome and valid

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            frick, I meant to reply to

            >selling rainbow-colored dicks in front of kids
            Where? I haven't seen this one

            not that other anon but
            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11517503/Dean-Chicago-school-says-students-shown-dildos-butt-plugs-teaching-queer-sex.html

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            I know it's a meme to say but we are actively in our Weimer Republic arc. Sadly I don't think we're gonna get out of it unscathed, we're probably heading towards a molasses slow societal collapse like Rome had. No cool riots in the street or way to fight back, just watching as rights and beliefs we once held to be self evident get eroded and the cost of living progressively gets worse and worse until there is no middle class and the average wage can never ever buy a halfway decent house or vehicle. Hell is entropy, and right now we're living in it, baby

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              True, but people are getting more rowdy it seems. I think things are going to be alright in the future but there's going to be quite a bit of violence. Hopefully Davos and the WEF bites the bullet during it.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              It only feels slow because we're watching it play out in real time. Rome took more than a century to collapse, and it had several close calls along the way.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              This is really "waning days of the Roman Republic", so if we're lucky we at least get to transform to a stylish Empire for a few centuries

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                The Western Roman Empire was a dirt poor feudal Christian theocracy, idiot.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              And here comes the Yank Nazi claiming the Weimar Republic was some massive left wing orgy run by israeli people until Hitler saved Germany

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                And here comes the man living on planet moron that acts like it wasn't a gigantic depression with rampant child prostitution in the larger cities. Real fricking chin scratcher how I didn't even mention israelites and you bring them up, nor did i even say anything positive about Hitler, only that we're in a very similar situation to the Republic and the latter era of Rome. Do your parents a favor and tell them you love them. I'd normally tell a dipshit like you to kill themselves but I'm trying to be a better man and avoid flippant statements like that, gay boy.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Tinker Bell has reportedly faced scrutiny from Disney’s Stories Matter team ahead of the debut of Disney+ in 2019. The team reportedly flagged and labeled the character to Disney executives as "potentially problematic," claiming that she is “body conscious” and “jealous of Peter Pan’s attention,” according to a 2022 report from The New York Times.
          The Swedt Baby Inc DEI consultants of Disney. These morons are also responsible for the shitshow that is Wish

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      At this point "problematic" just means "heterosexual".

      THE QUOTE IS IN THE OP? HOW moronic ARE YOU?

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >THE QUOTE IS IN THE OP? HOW moronic ARE YOU?
        the OP pic is a literally-who on facebook quoting an unnamed 'disney rep'
        thats not a source. link the interview the quote is from or something, or name the disney rep.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        You don’t understand how sources work.

  6. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Thinkerbutt

  7. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Oh my fricking god I hate disney so god damn much

  8. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Too many girls expressed an interest to be 5 inches tall?

  9. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    If this is real, and I have no reason to believe it is real and not just more outrage farming, it's probably more likely due to the rampant sexual harassment like what happened to the Jasmines and that one Gaston.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/JyP2esi.jpeg

      Disney is pulling the plug on Tinkerbell.

      RIP 1953-2024

      This is insane. I saw at least 30 different women on tiktok that had those same proportions and aesthetics.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >that one Gaston
      The one who left the role and does gay porn now?

  10. 7 days ago
    Birchy

    >A few self hating women complained so we're censoring her for the "modern audience"
    Yeah nobody was offended by Tinkerbell frick off.

  11. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Tinkerbell is kill?
    no

  12. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Unpopular opinion but I think the Tinkerbell from "Fox's Peter Pan and the pirates" was the best one
    the one from the 90s anime is probably the worst by far design wise, plus all the pirates on that show looked like proto One Piece characters

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      She cute

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous
      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        That’s awesome. Is that a bubblegum card?

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, Disney actually tried to shut down production of Fox's Peter Pan cartoon since they basically think they own Peter Pan, they sued them twice
          yet they had no problem with the 1989 Peter Pan anime because it was made outside the States, I guess

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            >Disney representatives: Tinkerbell can't be a woman in your show because that was Disney's idea, she can only be a light with wings however
            >Fox representatives: Tinkerbell is a girl, the original BOOK says so

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous
      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Looks like that 90s anime version of The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        When the anime original character is the cutest

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Takes over Hook's role as the main antagonist of the show during the second half

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        The show is actually great if you get past some of the designs, this anime and Fox's "Peter Pan & The Pirates" series are way better than the Disney movie IMO (Disney's Tinkerbell is hot still)

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          FOX's Captain Hook was the most threatening out of all the animated Captain Hooks (the anime one had a mecha and was a confirmed pedo, but he was too silly to take seriously)

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            ?si=CKaqexeVd8Ox9wFL

            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              damn fine representation of Ol' Captain Hook.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              ?si=ZS_20BR0Jq1zvk5s
              Tim Curry has portrayed two of the most iconic pirates in Literature. This can't be a coincidence.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            He's not actually that threatening in the original book. He's so stricken with stage fright (the best term to use; he exists to play a part in a childish fantasy) after his men capture Peter that he's noticably damp with sweat and is embarrssed when Peter notices.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >It was also the only one of the "World Masterpiece Theater" productions to be broadcast on TV in the UK. No Japanese names can be found in the staff credits at this time, and even on the subtitle screen, the name of the screenwriter of the English version is written in large letters: "written by Melora Harte".
        lmao

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Were they bragging that they were anime but made by Westerners essentially?

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Art design reminds me of that one movie Cat-Napped!! Must be the same studio.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          It's not the same studio, it's the same character designer: Takashi Nakamura.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous
        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Soul

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Japan really liked the Wizard of Oz, they adapted it 5 times, 2 as part of anime anthology series (1978 & 1995), 1 as an anime movie (1982) and 2 as an anime series (1986 and 1992)

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Good taste

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          I recognize Doritha

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Tin Man was carrying the team hard, the Lion didn't do shit after the first arc

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Dumbelina, more like. She definitely looks like she's got an extra chromosome.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >that raccoon frick
        I remember seeing his ass get beaten in saltybet. Frick you for spamming your washbear super.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      But she's not even embonpoint!

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        I found a picture of the author

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        THICC

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >embonpoint
        Note that Embonpoint in 1902 is VERY different, where you can see 1902's wollds fattest man in any walmart.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Fox Tinkerbell is pretty skinny, anon.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      She looks like a mage. Does she cast any spells, other than Greater Dick Enlargement?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >plus all the pirates on that show looked like proto One Piece characters
      Shit, you are right!!
      Always felt there was something off about them, now I know what! Thanks.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Unpopular opinion
      Not sure if it is accurate to say it is "unpopular". Sure, Disney Tink is far thiccer, but I think Fox Tink is cuter, so it is reduced to a matter of personal taste.

      Peter Pan and the Pirates is truly a gem. For me there is no better Hook than Tim Curry.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Unpopular opinion but I think the Tinkerbell from "Fox's Peter Pan and the pirates" was the best one
      Fox's Peter Pan was great but my dick will always point toward Loisel's Tinkerbelle because she looks like a saucy latina who would give you footjobs while calling you a good boy.

  13. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Not enough black or Latina or israeli.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      I'd be game with her having that frazzled israelite hair and huge breasts. Though, she'd be nagging, well, worse than any other woman nags.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        If the breasts are good enough I can deal with the nagging.

  14. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Don't even care about the redesign but the term "for modern audiences" just pisses me off so bad. It's just so fricking stupid.

  15. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Good. Kid me had to hide his boner whenever I saw those tinkerbell mascots. Finally young boys can go to Disney world in peace.

  16. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    This sounds like a hoax

  17. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    haven't they removed Jasmine?

  18. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    would you take your daughter there?
    in an imaginary scenario were you arent broke an ugly and have children
    would ou take her there? whats the best alternative?

  19. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >they're removing her because she's white
    Believe me, they would've just said that if that was the case. Also

    [...]
    haven't they removed Jasmine?

    This sounds like a hoax

    Ten years ago---hell, half that, even---it would've been.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Believe me, they would've just said that if that was the case
      It's cute you still think Disney would be that transparent with the public.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Of course, it'd be couched in "pro-Diversity™" language, but if it was the case, that's how they'd put it.

  20. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    If they really believed this, they'd start hiring 250 pound girls to play Ariel and Cinderella.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Anaheim dweller here. COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED RUMOR is that it's because Disney is having more GHETTO ASS BULLSHIT problems, and they're happening to tinkerbell.

      Some fricker trying to sexually harass the tink for their tiktok.

      Some THOT taking issue with HER MAN paying too much attention to tinkerbell's bells.

      The speculated plan is to keep Tink up and away and out of hair weave pulling range.

      Vid only vaugely related.

      There was a BIG internal slapfight on whether they wanted black ariel or not.

      It's because the veteran employees and non-woke people keep walking out (e.g. what happened to the original team working on Wish).

      Many were FIRED.

  21. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    So this is the original article making the claim:
    https://www.news-journal.com/arena/thestreet/disney-world-cuts-classic-character-from-meet-and-greets-amid-scrutiny/article_1da7eaa6-a95f-5ebf-a0ca-a166d4f7e166.html

    and this is the source they cite:
    https://plandisney.disney.go.com/question/why-tinkerbell-no-longer-meet-greet-plans-bring-back-567110/

    Said source only says that Tinkerbell isn't currently doing standard walk-around meet and greets due to the rotating cast of meet and greet characters. She does still appear in the parade and other scheduled attractions.

    TLDR: its ragebait bullshit.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      If it's all the same to you we're gonna do 500 posts on the lie instead, cool?

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        You know I thought you were joking earlier

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      If it's all the same to you we're gonna do 500 posts on the lie instead, cool?

      The “original article making the claim” is Chris Williams, and it’s very much real
      facebook DOT com SLASH groups/1247563199057863/permalink/1866725977141579/
      Castrate yourselves, american disneytroons

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        you first moron

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >A guy on facebook said it so it's true
        Bro.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Oh, so it was bullshit the entire time.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Ah, so its ragebait bs that some youtubers are gonna make ai reaction images for and b***h about it long enough to monetize, right?

  22. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Tink shouldn't have said the n word if she didn't want to be cancelled.
    S.

  23. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    How the frick is tinker bell even offensive anyways? And why the frick does disney continue to do bullshit like pander to these extremely offended morons when all it does is self destruct their image more?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >unrealistic body image

      No shit. She was like less than 10 inches tall so of course she will be an unrealistic standard for women/girls.

      She looks like this.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Ass could be bigger

  24. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >unrealistic body image

    No shit. She was like less than 10 inches tall so of course she will be an unrealistic standard for women/girls.

  25. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Hello, average-looking woman in the photo who looks a bit like Barbara Windsor! You're too problematic with your body type! Could you please put on 50 pounds? This whole redesign is important to stop making kids of FOUR worried about body image, which is totally a thing they think about, and not just a cynical attempt by myself to re-invent the fricking wheel and shift larger sized clothe cause kids are getting fater

    You're out of a job and we're not making clothes for starving kids with dstended stomachs even though they make the clothes, but progress is progress! Yay!

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Up where they walk
      Up where they run
      A week's wage of just one Pound, thirty-one,
      Making fat Disney clothes, that's woke I suppose,
      In the third world.

  26. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >problematic image for…young girls
    >young girls
    *adult hambeasts
    Tinker Bell is a magical fricking cartoon creature. Outside of that, she’s not even all that unrealistically built. She probably actually resembles what these seething cows might look like had they not totally given up. They are jealous of a goddamn cartoon character.

  27. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    They might have misworded that a big. Young girls actually like pretty girls and fairies. It's angry single 40 something white women that enrage at the concept of a woman that weighs less than 300lbs as an unrealistic body image.

  28. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Is Disney not paying attention to the fact that they're losing tons of money.

  29. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Tinkerbell was flat. Ask Pam.
    >verification not required

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking lies

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        heres the full clip btw. Is Tommy right? Was Peter Pan gay?

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Nope. Next question.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Tinkerbell was flat.
          What? Didn't her parents take her to the theatre to watch the film?

          Oh, right...

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            >webm brokes

            What?

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            How did I never notice this? Also I find it weird they gave her a large ass when in the 1940s large asses weren't in vogue. Large asses only became popular in the 90s when rap became mainstream

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              "Large asses" weren't in vogue but men have always like large hips, which tends to mean wide if not bubbly asses.
              Tink being meant to be more comically cute than classy meant she didn't have to have princess proportions with thin, delicate features.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Intriguing. So it's not really about her ass, it's just her hips that are large? We're large hips considered cute but not ideal?

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Her ass would still be wide thanks to the hips, fashion of the 20th century generally favored slender figures for women which is why you see so many things from those years of women disliking having a big butt. Big hips was generally coded for liking a nice ass too, but more of a pert and well shaped one over a large, bubble butt.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Martin's right here, Tinkerbell has a pretty nice ass.
          Not super big or anything, but nice and shapely, the perfect amount of plumpness.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous
            • 7 days ago
              Anonymous

              >Tinkerbell was flat.
              What? Didn't her parents take her to the theatre to watch the film?

              Oh, right...

              No proper 35mm scan

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Wow cool something in media that mentioned that

          Martin's right here, Tinkerbell has a pretty nice ass.
          Not super big or anything, but nice and shapely, the perfect amount of plumpness.

          True but it’s weord on what’s allowed or not. Is this bad or just considered a joke cause. I don’t think it’s ever been censored and the new featurette on the new dvd mentions her having a body.it was just on free-form but didn’t see if it was censored

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >you guys are really sitting here talking about cartoon character's bodies?
      Gods, if only she knew how bad things would become

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Hoodrats don't own Dat Ass.

  30. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    It started with Barbie Dolls, it was eventually going to make it's way into other forms of media. No matter how much these people try to sweep fictional beauty under the rug, they can't change the beauty standards within our minds. It all just means we're reverting back to what was a thing in century's past.

  31. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >outrage clickbait from unsourced D-list blog """news"""
    Why's it always shit like this and why do morons fall for it every time.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >unsourced
      The name of the source is right there, in the form of a watermark.

  32. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Disney is desperately trying to create an audience consisting entirely of trannies and ugly homosexuals.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Well they already have them playing The Evil Queen.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Disney knows that Blackrock ESG money is their only reliable source of income now. Their high executives can no longer afford their yatch parties and private jets from box office and licensing deals alone.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >Blackrock ESG
        god you’re moronic

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          stop posting on Cinemaphile, larry fink

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            this isn’t your normal every day moronation, this is advanced moronation

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              You still haven't explained how esg has nothing to do with disney, moron.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          But anon, the cbs has dei the fbi in the cia and the rip is going to dip the afk lol the crt will esg the pbs and then they'll jfk the rpa

          it's all so fricking simple you feebs

  33. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I'm glad I'm not a girl growing up in the modern age, being told it's wrong to be feminine. No wonder so many of them turn ftm now and are willing to cut off their breasts because tiktok said so.

  34. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I'm surprised they're still on the woke train considering it's been the main cause of all their flops.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Once you reach a certain level in a corporation, make connections and friends etc, you basically become unfireable.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      It's because the veteran employees and non-woke people keep walking out (e.g. what happened to the original team working on Wish).

  35. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I'm convinced this whole woke thing from Disney is a streamlining scheme

    Think about it, once all differentiation between characters is achieved, all they'll have to animate is stick figures, allowing them to churn out content for pennies on the dollar. Once everything but the most basic humanoid form is outlawed, their cost-profit ratio might finally even out.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      But people don't want that. Human beings operate mostly on aesthetics. We like things that look good.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        I never said it wasn't moronic, just that Disney wants all standards erased so they can spit in their consoomers mouthes and get paid for it.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Then why do so many men have an asian fetish?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      I think when people identify as commies, talk like commies, and behave like commies, it's not unreasonable to assume they're doing commie shit.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >woke
      moron

      I think when people identify as commies, talk like commies, and behave like commies, it's not unreasonable to assume they're doing commie shit.

      this isn't 1960 anymore grandpa

  36. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    haven't they removed Jasmine?

    I was in Disney World last year and they were selling race swapped princess dolls in one of the MGM stores near tower of terror. Strangely, they actually had some Jasmine dolls that were swapped to being white or at least white looking

  37. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Isn’t tinker bell flying over the park a big deal at these places? Haven’t been since I was a kid but I vaguely remember that.

  38. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    The reason they’re mad is because Peter has the power in their relationship. Her design isn’t sexy enough for troons and postgraduate fat women to get mad about. Honestly surprised more ire isn’t directed at Peter who acts like a proud and red blooded troll. Kinda like what Cinemaphileers want to be like except he does it in real life

  39. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >looking female is no longer an achievable standard

  40. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    LGBT told us they just wanted to get married and nothing else. Why did they go on to frick up literally everything in our society?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Narcissistic people who can't have their own children, they want to take it out on everyone else.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Why did giving attention seeking perverts what they want lead to them finding even more moronic ways to seek attention?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Turns out that people who like to eat poop are not mentally well. Who could have known?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, this is a woman thing not a gay thing. it’s jealous straight chicks who are mad at cartoons

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        This isnt gays this is jealous fatties

        >an attractive woman is unrealistic

        What makes you think gays and bis want any of this? We hate this crap too.

        This isn't the gays, moronic frogposter. It's the israelites at disney going for the brownie points

        What the frick is this meme? Gays CONSTANTLY cry about fanservice but than turn around to fellate hot men. You can see this blatant hypocrisy on social media all the time.

        Yes, women and feminists are a much bigger culprit, but tons of gays go along with it since many of them are also progressives.

        Sorry for the /misc/ but ti's just a lie to say gays also aren't doing this.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          >Gays CONSTANTLY cry about fanservice
          I've never seen even a single case of this ever happening, ever.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Gays don't care and lesbians / bis like it. It's straight women and sociopathic billionaires that pull this shit.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, I'm sorry to say gays have woman brain. It's been like this from the start.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >LAST NIGHT I POURED COFFEE ON MY TROUSERS AND IT’S THE GAYS WHO WERE AT FAULT! FACT!!!

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      This isnt gays this is jealous fatties

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      This is simply puritanism dressed in a progressive veneer, the idea of ethical capitalism or "capitalism with a human face" is sadly not a new concept. What we are seeing is the culmination of an unholy marriage between compassionate liberal conservatism and vague progressivism. This shit has been decades in the making, LGBT groups are being taken for a ride as much as everyone else.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      americans never truly got over their puritanical roots

      Dumb frogposter

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      This is the fat acceptance movement pushing this crap. You know the same fricks saying its ok to be 5'4, 250lb, eat what you want, exercise once a week, and push the EXTRA THICK memes on Cinemaphile?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >an attractive woman is unrealistic

      What makes you think gays and bis want any of this? We hate this crap too.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >What makes you think gays and bis want any of this? We hate this crap too.
        that has nothing to do with gays and bis, nice try, snowflake

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      it's not LGBT who do that, it's corporations, who use LGBT flag to push their own agendas

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Turns out if was a slippery slope after all.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      This isn't the gays, moronic frogposter. It's the israelites at disney going for the brownie points

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >This isn't the gays, moronic frogposter. It's the israelites
        Same thing

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Jews.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      How the hell does two men getting married have anything to do with Disney thinking Tinkerbell is problematic?

  41. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    They had plenty of varied characters in Tinkerbell's world to play around with. They just needed to present them to audiences, not kill the movies for a decade and then decide that Iridessa's fat cousin should be Tinkerbell now.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Never gonna have that solo movie of the super cute asian water fairy

      It fricking hurts bros

  42. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Another thing trying to be ruined by stupid annoying complaints from snowflakes thst have to ruin stuff for others just cause they don’t

  43. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I'm going to to pull Tinkerbell's plug if you know what I'm saying!

  44. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    NO!!!!
    What will the loose portion of women at my work dress up as now on Halloween that still gets family friendly approval?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >using the phrase "updated for modern audiences"
      >people are believing this literally who on facebook

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      I would love to bang one of those women

  45. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    At this point I don’t know how Iger was voted back on. The man must hate making money. Seriously can’t the major investors just kick him out?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      He led a woke rebellion against Chapek.

  46. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't the whole appeal of Tinkerbell that she's a complete b***h and you can sell her crossing her arms and being smug to whoever reads your shirt? Isn't that what everyone fricking worships about girl characters now?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Some random fat dyke complained so a multi-billion dollar company will pull the character for being wrongbad and lose millions of dollars because fat dykes are clearly their target demographic.

  47. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    i remember the meet and greet with tinkerbell in pixie hollow the most from my disneyland trip as a toddler. i was awkward, blonde, and didn't fit in- like tinkerbell in the 3d movies. i saw myself in her and i was so excited to see her. she's a great character. while i'm not as pretty as her, i still love her personality because it was never about LOOKING like her. i still cherish that memory and i'm disappointed that children won't have the same opportunity i had.

  48. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    First Peter Pan gets fricked over (look it up), then Tinkerbell.

  49. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Of course her body image is fricked up, Tinkerbell was never 5'+ ever.
    No child would mistake this hoe for Tinkerbell, she's jus there for male visitors to leer at.

  50. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >unrealistic body image
    >show a photo of a real woman playing the character
    Nani? How is it unrealistic if it’s super easy to find an actress to play the character?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, you're using basic logic. Don't do that. Bad Anon!

  51. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    they already ban cleavage from adult cartoons what the frick am i supposed to be happy about in this world

  52. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    This smells like bullshit even if it is real. Tink had her own fricking movies completely removed from Peter Pan. Modern kids are more likely to know her from those anyway. So what? The original movie was probably locked in the Vault for HOKUM SMOKUM PEACEY PIPUM RED MAN bullshit anyway. Why would Tink's portrayal in it weigh on anything?

  53. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Gosh, and you say the parks are bleeding money and attendance is the lowest it has ever been since the inception of the company?

    I wonder why.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Gosh, and you say the parks are bleeding money
      But that's basically impossible..
      >and attendance is the lowest it has ever been since the inception of the company?
      Lol, are you trying to wish this into reality? They had a poor couple years due to international travel not rebounding as fast post-Covid, but 2024 is already setting records.

      I mean I am sure they will be defunct in two more weeks!

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >But that's basically impossible..
        So impossible, in fact, that Star Wars Galaxies cost Disney $300 million and had to be shut down.

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          Bro I was there like a couple months ago. Place was fricking packed.

  54. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Tinkerbell having wide hips is as the author envisioned it.

  55. 7 days ago
    The Demon

    Yes I like this. You won't have anything Cinemaphile and you will still keep pumping money. Tiana will get an ovation. All females will be covered up like Jessica Rabbit and the Red Head and you aren't allowed to ogle them. Star Wars and Marvel will continue to dominate the parks. Synergy between films will expand even more in the parks. And you will buy it all up.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      >And you will buy it all up.
      No, I don't think I will

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      I remember a few years ago they announced a Jessica Rabbit something or other and an anon correctly predicted they’d have her solving a mystery or something so they could put her in a trench coat

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >muh YOU'LL KEEP BUYING IT cope
      I literally haven't purchased a Pokemon product in almost a decade and I haven't consumed a single piece of Marvel media since Endgame. Which I pirated.
      I'm willing to bet there are a lot of people like me.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      i love this copypasta

      • 6 days ago
        Boco

        Its copypasta? Oh good. Its Scrapper, so I wasn't sure.

  56. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    It's over

  57. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I can't wait for Tinkerbell to be reimagined with a design based on someone like Leslie Jones.

  58. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    We need to protect the fairies

  59. 7 days ago
    Anonymous
  60. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >unrealistic
    They mean her wings.

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe women should stop being pretentious and ruining everything, then they'll be given their wings and be freed of their punishment of periods.

  61. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Can Disney end yet?

  62. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >redesigning updated Tinkerbell for modern audiences
    Translation:
    We're gonna make her black

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      And trans.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        The fact that they decided a gay should play a "Fairy" shows how out of touch these people are.

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        Man I had forgot about this shit. They really went to the depths of African jungles to find this witch doctor.

  63. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >currently in the process of redesigning an updated Tinkerbell for modern audiences
    Ah shit, she’s going to be fat, isn’t she?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Worse. She's going to look like your average rail thin yoga bunny, with an unflattering haircut.

  64. 7 days ago
    Billy

    So, when are they kicking Gaston from the Disney parks? Oh yeah, never cause he's a man, and men don't care about crap like that

  65. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >disney giving more outrage bait ammo for right wing grifters on youtube

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      So we're just skipping over how it's a dumb thing and blaming the people rightfully calling out dumb thing? Do you sense a tinge of bias?

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        >leeeeft wiiiiing goooooooood
        >riiight wiiing baaaaaaaaaaad
        >leeeeft wiiiiing goooooooood
        >right wiiiiiiing baaaaaaaaaaad

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          That's reductive as shit and not helpful. Stop having issue with calling out bad behavior by your left wing overlords and hold them accountable.
          Stop picking sides and pick being right. Which Disney is not.

          • 7 days ago
            Anonymous

            You poor little soul

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              corporate shill

      • 7 days ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not skipping over it. I felt it was addressed adequately in the thread already that I didn't need to mention it. Feeling a bit attacked perhaps?

        • 7 days ago
          Anonymous

          I have no interest in youtube channels. It's just interesting how the buck is passed. It's not even "equally their fault" it is entirely on disney.

  66. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    and just as I suspected
    It's some big fat hermaphrodite with a Flock-Of-Seagulls haircut and only one nostril
    Oh man, I hate it when I'm right

  67. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    So what fatso within the company started b***hing about this?

  68. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    are you people stupid or something

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      Yes. Help us please. There are reasonable people here and we are trapped.

  69. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    americans never truly got over their puritanical roots

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Because morons like

      [...]
      Dumb frogposter

      happily drank the kool aid and think establishment puritanism is heckin progressive and edgy. I remember when progressives were actually against censorship but nowadays they gobble it up because it makes them look good to their swaths of moronic "friends" on discord

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, You know that posting Pepe the frog on Cinemaphile isn't allowed, I dunno why but that's how it is, I assume he was spammed in the past like the Ponies were

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Bigots like you wouldn’t understand the difference.

        Ah, so its ragebait bs that some youtubers are gonna make ai reaction images for and b***h about it long enough to monetize, right?

        Take it easy

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >country dedicated to Black person and troony worship
      >"why is this place so puritanical?"
      This board is brainrot personified

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Two things can be true.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Half the country wants to kill transgender people and lynch black people.

        • 6 days ago
          HILLARY LOST LOL

          Good

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      It just switched sides.
      At least some of the big companies pushing for this like Sony are suffering.
      Hope it was worth it.

  70. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Unrealistic body Image
    >They literally have a person with a similar body type and Tinkerbell

  71. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    This green menace is the #1 mascot of mentally unstable BPD Disney chicks. Every woman I've ever seen who loves tinkerbell has been utterly psychotic and they're proud of it too, they know.

  72. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I'm just going to say it's a half truth.
    Did you know Tinkerbell is one of the most sexually harassed characters at Disney? She's probably going to get her costume redesigned to be a lot less revealing, like they did to Jasmine, Pocahontas and Tarzan. She's not going anywhere.

  73. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Because you can see her panties and delicious fat bum?

    • 7 days ago
      Anonymous

      I'll miss Tinkerbell's huge ass

  74. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    Oh boy I can't wait for fat autistic black tinkerbell

  75. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    I fricking hate modern Disney so much.

  76. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    So, would this make Tinkerbell public domain?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Peter Pan the story is public domain. You can literally use Tinkerbell for whatever you want, so long as it's not *disney's* tinkerbell.

  77. 7 days ago
    Anonymous

    >unrealistic body image
    Just don't eat so much?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      You're asking the impossible for the average american

  78. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    What she should look like after the redesign.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      What we will get!
      How comes they didnt cancel Taylor Swift for the unrealistic body images?

  79. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    How is it unrealistic if it's right fricking there.
    >We must protect the women by putting them out of jobs
    This is booth babes all over again

  80. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    rancid feminist c**t at Disney malds over attractive female character and puts several pretty girls out of a job over it

    what a b***h

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      This is all Clinton's fault
      Unironically, Al Bundy Predicted this since all women these days are a unholy fusion of Meg, Marcy and the Fat women at the shoe store.

  81. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Let's see a fresh flow of NSFW Tinker's, that'll show'em.

  82. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >unrealistic body image
    Yeah... she's a fairy, of course a six inches tall fairy with wings and shit would be considered unrealistic.
    Is this bait?

  83. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Hahaha
    Bullshit, Tink is a money machine for merch
    This is going to backfire hard if it's official, which it probably isn't.

  84. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    This sounds like a repeat of what happened with Miss Bellum in the PPG 2016 shitshow

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Not only Miss Bellum, the same happened with the Animaniacs reboot

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Minerva a cute

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        At least they understand Minerva was too hot for TV.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >removing this haughty b***h
        Dam shame...

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          I should try to draw Minerva Mink at some point. But I remember disliking her as a kid. I don't remember any of the skits though, so I'll have to rewatch them.

          She has great expressions that they don't normally give to attractive women, which I appreciate, but I do remember her making me feel bad for some reason.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Minerva shows up in 15 episodes plus the movie and that Pinky & The Brain episode playing either secondary or supporting roles, but she only has 2 shorts as the main character "Moon over Minerva" and "Meet Minerva"

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous
          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Don't trust your kid self, your kid self was a dumbass. I used to loathe a lot of cartoons as a kid that I now love as an adult. And second act break-ups used to stress me out so much, I dreaded re-watching the movies remembering them.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            >But I remember disliking her as a kid.
            Honestly same boat, but I ended changing my tune, ended up liking haughty girls like Minerva, Brandy and the like. Just knowing that deep in there is a kernel of goodness.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              I always found it kinda funny how no matter how many sexy bodies they tried attaching them to, cartoons never managed to make me able to look past the muzzle all furries seem to have. That face just makes me think of a dog and thinking of a dog as sexy just makes me feel gross. Now, you get a furry with like, a little button nose or something or ears and a tail or whatever and we're game, but that trademark furry face just turns me right off.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Weak

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Lampshading your horrible choices doesn't excuse your horrible choices.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        They made the "we removed Nurse" thing a running gag, good thing this show was cancelled

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          >original joke was that Heloise was too smart to be just a nurse
          >revival twists the joke to imply that women are too moronic to be nurses, a traditionally female role since the beginning of fricking time

          The reboot was absolutely fricking garbage. Glad it's dead. Spit on it's fricking grave. What a waste of the OG voice talent.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Russian Hello Nurse is a cute

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          At least they were smart enough to make her hot, look at that pantyhose and legs

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          It is funny because men love to be cared for by cute women. It is even better if they are medical professionals. I like how real women to stupid to be a nurse, finds some other reason to remove a character that encourages the nursing field which is dwindling.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          >last panel
          Is that what was really said? Is that what is really implied? I have never heard anyone interpret the Hello Nurse joke as women are dumb. It seemed to me the butt of the joke was the men being awestruck by a hot nurse. Like a werewolf howling at a singer.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            >Is that what was really said?
            Yeah

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        The warners barely ever interacted with Minerva anyway.

        >removing this haughty b***h
        Dam shame...

        Can someone tell Bigdad to hyperfocus on Minerva next? I think it's a lateral move from Pacifica.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          They interacted a lot with Minerva during the last 2 seasons once the show moved to KidsWB and they were allowed to use Minerva again, she was in the movie finale too as part of the people trying to get the wishing star and the Pinky & The Brain finale

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Damn, Nerva really sticking her girls out here!
            Nice.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >How do we fix the supposed sexism towards women?
        >Remove them.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          "No person — no problem." — Stalin, modern Disney execs.

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          "No person — no problem." — Stalin, modern Disney execs.

          The Simpsons does the same thing with Apu ever since that documentary made them panic.

  85. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Why is it always young girls or women that the world needs to bend over for? At what point will people realize men are so fricked up now is because of how one sided and unfair the balance has become? Boys get zero support and are attacked for their natural behavior. Men are to carry society and constantly being blamed while being demanded more of. Breast cancer foundations and awareness, none for prostate cancer. Women evacuated, men stay to die. Did the marriage fail, well now the man has to pay for it the rest of his life. Men will logically continue to check out, and they will continue to berate and try to punish us for it until one day something breaks.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Boys get zero support and are attacked for their natural behavior.

      Why don’t boys pull themselves up by their bootstraps?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      The truth is that nobody expects women to succeed and everybody expects men to, naturally.
      They are children and you are the adult, it's incredibly unfair and it's also the truth. You are not equals, that was a lie.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      I used to not really think about it, but lately I'm also starting to feel boys and men are getting left behind. One issue that immediately comes to mind is it seems like nobody cares that women are attending college by like a 2:1 ratio, whereas lots of young men are just dropping off the face of the Earth after high school. A bunch of bored young men not doing anything with their lives can't be a good thing to just leave on the back burned like this.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        >boo hoo, poor men not selling themselves into debt slavery for a useless degree like women do

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          You ignored the point entirely. The point is a bunch of young men graduate high school then just frick off afterward, no ambitions or aspirations or anything. They just play video games all day or get high or drunk and work some unfulfilling job. Maybe they never leave their hometown. Having a bunch of men just removing themselves from society like that can't be a good thing to ignore, but everyone just does for some reason.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            That's called "living your life" you moronic child. Not everyone has aspirations and even less people achieve them. Some people just want to quietly live their life by working a simple job and enjoying simple hobbies in their free time. And how are women better off? Because they waste 4 years and 400k between the high school and the unfulfilling job steps?

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not talking about some schmuck who graduated high school and is now happy to sit on his ass for the rest of his life you fricking idiot. Lots of young men are not content with this lifestyle. That's what I mean. You get a bunch of bored guys who feel like they have no direction in life but who society ignores because it'd much rather focus on women's wellbeing and tells men they're just being pussies if they complain about any problems they're having, then this can lead to some of those young men getting violent as they try to find direction and meaning. It's what leads to strongmen rising to power in fragile countries because they give these young men a cause to fight for.

  86. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Wasn't this b***h literally popular enough to have her own cartoon and toyline? Why self sabotage?

  87. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    It's because most Disney World guests nowadays are fat blacks, isn't it?

  88. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Cinemaphile falls for ragebait bullshit AGAIN
    Sometimes I think you just want to be angry and miserable because it's the only time you actually feel something.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      It's real, it happened 4 days ago though

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        I think he means the reasoning. I can't find any actual news sources for this that isn't just right wing outrage bait sites. makes me think there's another reason tinker bell was removed

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          >“We are reviewing our offerings beyond the screen, which include products, books, music and experiences,” reads the Stories Matter homepage on Disney’s website. “While advisories for negative depictions of people and cultures may be added to some offerings, others will be reimagined. We are also investing in new ways to better reflect the rich diversity of stories in our world. This work is ongoing and will evolve as we strive toward a more inclusive tomorrow.”
          https://www.thestreet.com/travel/disney-world-cuts-classic-character-from-meet-and-greets-amid-scrutiny
          I'm sure there's another reason as to why they're removing her, but that's what the Disney representatives said

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          This video is more neutral

          Sounds like a combination of budget and wanting to promote newer characters

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            >Sounds like a combination of budget and wanting to promote newer characters
            This seems like the most obvious case.

            If it were just about the character's "look", it wouldn't be a problem, because they've already redesigned her for some of her solo movies. Pic related. A new costume and maybe a little bit of rehearsal time for the actresses to "update" her personality to better reflect that version of the character (or something different again), and they'd be good to go.

            Tink is one of the classic characters, but it makes sense that they might want to cycle her out with someone a bit more contemporary and relevant.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              She's also only gone from the Meet&Greet. Tinkerbelle is still part of other attractions.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                They probably took her off the Meet & Greet because of adult men creeping on her

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              >A new costume and maybe a little bit of rehearsal time for the actresses to "update" her personality to better reflect that version of the character (or something different again), and they'd be good to go.
              I don't think they see that as an option, that version of Tinkerbell hasn't had a movie in many years, Disney probably doesn't see as a recognizable character anymore

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Sure, but you don't even need to go that far. Just have the "current" version of Tink show up one day wearing a slightly more substantial top, a longer skirt (or morph it into more of a skort), and/or give her green leggings. If the problem was"just" about the character having a "problematic body image", then the cheapest and easiest option requires only a few relatively simple modifications to the wardrobe.

                It's overkill to throw out the entire character (at least, from that element of the park) ... unless you wanted to do so already, and wanted to come up with a reason for it which (might) win you some brownie points. Disney theme park fans don't like change, so better to make it sound like you're making a change for noble reasons rather than for marketability.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Indeed. Something is fishy, and something seems to be a play.
                If it was just censorship, they could have just altered her outfit. I think they're deliberately making up an excuse to get rid of her.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              >More clothes

              We are fricking going backwards. We're unironically at the point where Flappers would be considered to risqué for modern audiences. Who is pushing this shit?

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Flappers weren’t the standard for how to dress in family friendly children’s media so this whole argument is pants on head level of idiocy. Flappers were also considered decadent and scandalous by the contemporary social standards hence why it was a youthful movement that revolved around getting wasted and dancing at adult parties full of booze and debauchery, it was not a fashion choice for making appearances in child matinees.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >family friendly children’s media

                Oh please frick off with your moralgayging and pretending like you suddenly care about purity in children's media. If your ilk did, pic related wouldn't be a thing. You also forget there was a time nobody saw Tinker Bell's outfit as controversial. It's only controversial now because you weirdos are obsessed with the idea that straight men could jack off to her (just like the conservative puritans of the past) and therefore she must be censored.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                He's not moralgayging you fricking idiot, he's pointing facts out. The flapper comparison was utterly fricking moronic especially when Walt Disney was notorious for wanting to make his films squeaky clean in terms of content.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >It's a fact because.....JUST BECAUSE IT IS CHUD

                He was making a comparison. You nu-puritans want women to go back to the days where they couldn't even show their ankles. Trying to troony logic out of this fact wont work. You unironically proved him right by implying flappers are risqué in your previous post (yes I said you samegay)

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Nobody is telling women to cover up. You once again showcase how people like you are reactionary hyperventilating idiots when you think there’s some huge puritanism agenda at play when all this is is family friendly brand corporations wanting to maintain a squeaky clean image and avoid even a slim chance of controversy by preemptively choosing to cover their own ass by removing things they think could he an issue or no long work with their image because x is outdated or negative stereotype, etc.

                You can be an adult for two seconds and acknowledge facts or you can be a little b***h who throws tantrums over stupid shit in a way that makes your parents embarrassed that they ever forgot to use a rubber.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Nobody is

                Remember people, when a Leftists uses this phrase, they are lying.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                It’s the right who b***h and moan about women needing to cover themselves up. That’s why they do shit like created that takes celebrity women in public functions images and “cleans up” them by putting them in long sleeves and traditional dresses. Utterly hypocritical behaviour because then are also huge coomers and throw tantrums every time they see a woman who isn’t a skinny fashion model getting cast in a movie or tv show because muh beauty, when all they mean is they can’t jerk off to something

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >It’s the right who b***h and moan about women needing to cover themselves up. That’s why they do shit like created that takes celebrity women in public functions images and “cleans up” them by putting them in long sleeves and traditional dresses.

                Ah yes its the right wing chuds at Marvel doing that, not the pronoun obsessed troons like yourself

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                That is exactly same case of Disney making sure its content is as inoffensive and clean family fun as possible, you whiny dumbass. They don’t focus on coomers because Disney is about KIDS and incel losers jerking off to cartoons in a smelly basement.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Troon admits he is concerned about straight men jacking off to non offensive pictures of women hence why women must be in burkas

                What's ironic is the only reason you're confused about your gender is porn addiction

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Disney does it because they want to sidestep controversy and make their MCU characters as mass-market appeal as possible. But where does that controversy stem from in the first place? Puritanical conservatives wailing about sinful flesh.

                For every leftwing dummy on twitter complaining about acceptable body types there is an entire church group who thinks that kids shouldn't know that sex exists at all because otherwise they might be tempted to sin.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Who are you lying to at this point? Its sad. Nobody in 2024 believes Disney gives a damn what "le puritanical conservatives" think. It's you freaks doing the censorship.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Puritanical conservatives wailing about sinful flesh.
                This guy is straight up still living in the 90s. Those kind of people are the last people these media companies are worried about upsetting nowadays.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Media corporations don’t want sex in their products when they’re branded as family friendly because that type of conservative would accuse them of being pedophiles. I mean they do it regardless but companies like Disney want to play it safe. And that’s too hard to accept so instead coomers just whine about the left like morons who only think with their dicks.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                It can both be right tbh. The left don't use the same language as the right when they make their complaints. So it's very easy to tell.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah. If it were conservatives, they'd say so. They're not exactly shy about it. And we know Disney does NOT care what conservatives think these days.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                But they do want their money, so there is a limit to how much they can drift away from conservative values.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                It's funny how libs used to argue prudishness caused sexuality to whiplash and escalate in response, but now that they're the prudes, it's suddenly the other side's fault for sexual extremism and not their own for going ballistic at the slightest titty

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >but now that they're the prudes

                If you’re a coomer.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >coomer

                There you go again being obsessed with what straight men do with their dicks in their own homes.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Journalists HATE sexy women. They all call it "objectification" even when many women don't give a damn. A conservative church mom might complain about things being too sexy, but for a long period of time the powers that think women should cover up are feminists.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Objectification is a thing. There is a difference between male sexism driven nudity vs nudity that’s artistic, body positive and feminist. Coomers only care about the former because it’s about getting needing all media revolve around their penis so that they have endless stream of new masturbation material

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Objectification is a thing.
                Stopped reading there.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                As a woman, you are biologically dumb.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >coomer this coomer that
                Sure coomers want to jerk off to women, but what about non-coomers. People who are not part of the coomer demographic or the woke demographic don't care about Tink looking the way she is.
                >objectification is a thing
                Sure, but is THIS Tinkerbell objectification? She is wearing a fairy dress. Is her design objectification or is it simply an attractive look? Just because something looks mildly sexy doesn't mean it is objectification. It's not black and white "porn or art". Sometimes it's just curves because it's just there.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >male sexism driven nudity vs nudity that’s artistic
                >men vs art
                You couldve at least pretended to be unbiased by saying pornographic nudity vs artistic nudity

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >nudity that’s artistic, body positive and feminist
                Nobody want to see a fat, ugly, gender studies major b***h with purple hair naked. Not even black men who regurally frick them, because i'm pretty sure they only settle for them because normal white women don't put out for them

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >objectification is a thing
                Only if you're talking about that fetish where women are magically transformed into objects such as onaholes.

                What the frick is going on where fricking Tinkerbell and Doctor Suess books are called "inappropriate" and get banned but homosexuals selling rainbow-colored dicks in front of kids is A-OK?

                Happens during gay pride events in some places. But followup belongs straight to pol. Unless you're looking to buy a rainbow dick, in which case I suggest Bad Dragon as a starting point.

                >letting kids go to gay events
                That's 100% on the parents.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Objectification is a thing. There is a difference between male sexism driven nudity vs nudity that’s artistic, body positive and feminist. Coomers only care about the former because it’s about getting needing all media revolve around their penis so that they have endless stream of new masturbation material

                objectification is GOOD because evolution made us that way.

                eggs are valuable and sperm is cheap, after all.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                They hate women period. Anything traditionally feminine - anything UNtraditionally feminine - it's always the same thing. If it's about a woman, she has to be vetted and sculpted to suit a big, fat movement or culture or some shit. Because a woman can never matter to them unless she's helping them promote their latest penis extension.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >maintain a squeaky clean image and avoid even a slim chance of controversy
                Oh yes, because homosexuals, trannies and anti-white shit in cartoons for babies never ever EVER would cause a controversy!
                Bro you are fricking moron!

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Bigots like you wouldn’t understand the difference.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Reddit moment

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                >Nobody is telling women to cover up.
                Yes, you are. And unlike muslims you don't have the moral high ground, you're just being homosexuals.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                You need to understand.

                Women are more puritanical and at the same time less puritanical than men are. If you travel to a Muslim country, you’ll quickly notice that women are the most insane bigots when it comes to judging how women dress. Not the men. Islam allowed ugly women to artificially inflate their own value by forcing beautiful women onto the same playing field as ugly women due to the ninja costume dress code. Achmed can’t tell if there’s a dream or a nightmare under those robes, so ugly women get a fighting chance to share a Sheikh. The pussy cartel in the Ummah is VASTLY more powerful than outside it. Of course this applies to anywhere women exist. Christian women do it, Buddhist women do it, and Atheist women are not immune from it either. Feminists seen sex negative in this sense because they are. But rather than blaming pretty women directly like Conservative/Religious women do, they shift blame and shame onto men. “Pig! Creep! How dare you find this smoking hot chick attractive?! Shame on you! Beauty is a social construct! True beauty is inside!”. They present censorship and degradation of beauty as a feminist act protecting women against lecherous swine men.

                When women talk about men, they’re talking about a very narrow or a very massive category. Women dress like bawds for the 20% of men they find attractive. That’s who the bikinis and lingerie and pushup bras and booty shorts and skirts and makeup and plastic surgery is for. They don’t give a frick if those guys stare and get horny.

                For the average man however, as much as his attention is craved (albeit not as much as a 20% man) he is also despised for overstepping. This is the “male gaze” lesbians and leftist women are angry about. Nothing horrifies and upsets a woman more than when a man she views as beneath her feeling aroused or getting bold. His proper role is that of an asexual pet.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                I've heard lots of stuff saying zoomers are really sex averse for some reason. Maybe this is part of it. Seeing a woman in a bra or a guy in a speedo scares them I guess.

              • 6 days ago
                The Demon

                How about stop ogling women and keep your fricking hands to yourself? You are literally selling sex figures to kids with these characters showing this much skin.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                "The demon", lmao, what you think you're master cheif or some shit? Better that kids are sold normal and healthy visions of attractive women instead of being given nightmares every night by grobnetasha the diverse, devourer of cheese.

              • 6 days ago
                The Demon

                >Better that kids are sold normal and healthy visions of attractive women

                Kids aren't paying attention to that shit. Sweaty neckbeards who watch children's cartoons do.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                So if they're not paying attention to it, then how can it be a problem for them, "demon"?

              • 6 days ago
                The Demon

                Why do you need it in the first place? What benefit does this have for children?

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                Please do not engage with Scrapper, he is a lost cause and will only use your attention to validate his miserable life.

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous

                I think I've met him before. You are right. Nice to know he has a name now. You seen him anywhere else?

              • 6 days ago
                Anonymous
            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              One problem. I bet that tink redesign crashes any ability to sell merch of her.

            • 6 days ago
              Anonymous

              >Sounds like a combination of budget and wanting to promote newer characters
              That means they have to pay someone to make a new suit and hire and train another actress to play the new character.
              They are able to promote new characters but at a much higher cost than promoting well known and popular characters to adults.
              I guess its inevitable

              >"...an unrealistic body image..."
              Why because she doesn't weigh as much as a manatee?

              Tell me this isn't the earliest character that's gotten Stellar Bladed. Not only are Tinkerbell's relative proportions realistic and achievable (unless you're naturally large-chested), SHE HAD A LIVE MODEL, just like with Eve from Stellar Blade, so you can't say there aren't women out there who look like that.

              Margaret Kerry, Tink's live model, told a story about how, when she and her husband (at the time) first watched Peter Pan, he leaned over and said to her, "I'd recognize those thighs anywhere." (I may be getting that quote slightly off, as that is from memory.)

              Fact is, Tinkerbell is a thick-bottomed pettanko, and I'm pretty sure there are plenty of women out there with that shape: I dated at least one of them, and they aren't exactly rare.

              She's unrealistic because humans can't be that tiny unless they are in the womb but nobody wants to frick a strawberry jelly looking fetus

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Here

      [...]
      [...]
      >The move from Disney comes after it confirmed her disappearance from meet-and-greets at the resort in February.

      >Tinker Bell has reportedly faced scrutiny from Disney’s Stories Matter team ahead of the debut of Disney+ in 2019. The team reportedly flagged and labeled the character to Disney executives as "potentially problematic," claiming that she is “body conscious” and “jealous of Peter Pan’s attention,” according to a 2022 report from The New York Times.

      >Disney’s Stories Matter team was developed to spot and correct “negative depictions of people and cultures” in Disney’s products.

      >“We are reviewing our offerings beyond the screen, which include products, books, music and experiences,” reads the Stories Matter homepage on Disney’s website. “While advisories for negative depictions of people and cultures may be added to some offerings, others will be reimagined. We are also investing in new ways to better reflect the rich diversity of stories in our world. This work is ongoing and will evolve as we strive toward a more inclusive tomorrow.”
      https://www.thestreet.com/travel/disney-world-cuts-classic-character-from-meet-and-greets-amid-scrutiny

  89. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >she's le promblematic for modern audiences!!
    no one fricking cares, no one's actually asking for this

  90. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >real live human performer
    >unrealistic body image

  91. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

  92. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >unrealistic body image

    She’s not obese?

  93. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Unrealistic body image
    For Americans
    >Dependency on Peter Pan for approval
    This is the realistic part tho.

  94. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Guys, please don't tell me you are actually falling for the excuse. None of that shit in the OP matters one but tot he people who made this decision. Its just the spin they put on it.
    Disney wants to make a new design for a character they own so they can re-sell everything tinkerbell related all over again. Thats it. Its a merchandising and publicity stunt, this is just the paper thin excuse for why they 'have' to do it.
    If Disney was still making as much money as they used to, this wouldn't be happening. Its an attempt at cash and attention.

  95. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Gooners die God laughs

  96. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >Left wing company censors yet another woman
    >Leftists blame le conservatives for it

    Serious mental illness.

  97. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Better for her to be dead than blackwashed

  98. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Pretty obvious they’re going to make her overweight and non-white then

  99. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Why have cartoons and comics when you can get entertained for hours by pretending something that doesn't exist does? How could people ever be bored with the power of imagination.

  100. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >"...an unrealistic body image..."
    Why because she doesn't weigh as much as a manatee?

    Tell me this isn't the earliest character that's gotten Stellar Bladed. Not only are Tinkerbell's relative proportions realistic and achievable (unless you're naturally large-chested), SHE HAD A LIVE MODEL, just like with Eve from Stellar Blade, so you can't say there aren't women out there who look like that.

    Margaret Kerry, Tink's live model, told a story about how, when she and her husband (at the time) first watched Peter Pan, he leaned over and said to her, "I'd recognize those thighs anywhere." (I may be getting that quote slightly off, as that is from memory.)

    Fact is, Tinkerbell is a thick-bottomed pettanko, and I'm pretty sure there are plenty of women out there with that shape: I dated at least one of them, and they aren't exactly rare.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous
      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous
        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous
  101. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Whatever the reason for removing her is I sincerely doubt it's because Disney thinks she's problematic now. She was featured in a recent Lorcana gift set, plus there are a bunch of other cards featuring her original design.
    Wasn't she prominent in the Disney 100 short as well?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      she had a Meet and Greet at the Town Hall area of Main Street, I just think Disney didn't think Tinkerbell fit in Main Street

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      These Lorcana sets are probably going through development for months, this Tinkerbell decision is brand new.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        or… hear me out… you’re stupid for believing Facebook post

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Because Disney would NEVER do [thing that aligns with all the other shit they've been doing] right?
          It's like making fun of a guy for believing that a bird shit on someone's windshield. It's a thing birds do.

  102. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Can’t tell if ragebait or not. Need to find a stronger source on the media matters thing. Only stuff that supports this is that she has been removed as a meet and greet and it seems like they are phasing out her classic green dress design in SOME material plus she turned into a black in the shit live action whatever that was. She still appears on floats in her normal green dress though

  103. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Fake or not. I do not understand how "body positivity" morons should get angry when Tink is all about accepting bodies that are a little rounder.
    Is it cause the modern man grew to accept pear figures that they suddenly want to 180?

  104. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >dependency of approval and/or attention from Peter Pan
    So they admit they just completely forgot about all of this?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >pirate fairy movie
      >only time Christina Hendricks doesn't have huge breasts on display

      Would have killed to see a fairy Hendricks flying with those gozongas.

  105. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    man that "safe" corporate talk gives me litteral headaches. i know english is not my native language but why can't they talk like normal functioning human beings when they make these stupid press releases

  106. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    The source is wdwpro, known grifter and the person one half of Clownfishtv is having an affair with, but not the one you'd expect.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      no one here is actually gonna listen to you (unfortunately), they've already twisted this fib as "fact' in their demented heads and now just want to vent about moronic schizo conspiracies'

  107. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Subversive warfare. They are ruining or cancelling everything people like. All to anger and demoralize you.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Demoralized to a point of not subbing? I dont think you all understand what the term demoralizing means.

  108. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    at this point why even bother anymore?
    frick everything, whatever.

  109. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Get rid of Balu too, unrealistic body standards.

  110. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    She’s… just Marilyn Monroe?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >She’s… just Marilyn Monroe?
      She's just Margaret Kerry.

  111. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    I get the feeling that no one actually complained and some HR Karen made up this mass backlash to this character that hasn't been relevant in decades so she could pat herself on the back for opposing "unrealistic body image" and other made up problems.

  112. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >unrealistic body images.
    >unrealistic.
    >on flesh and blood person playing the character.

  113. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    nah, they are just gonna racebend her, Disney already managed to eliminate all redheads and now they are coming for the blondes.

  114. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    So what you can't depict girls being jealous? You can depict girls being bad?
    Jesus Christ.

  115. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    None of the articles I'm finding about this have a real source so I can only assume they're ragebaiting.

  116. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    How often does Tinkerbell's fat butt fart?

  117. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    HA HA GET FRICKED FAIRIES! GO BACK TO YOUR CIRCLES AND STAY GO!

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      calm down crocker

  118. 6 days ago
    Anonymous
    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Holy frick.

  119. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Good job, Disney. Very progressive. One of your current employees fed women to a rapist, but other than that, good job.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      That square headed c**t has blackmail on every big executive in Hollywood. She's basically made for life.

  120. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Question for chicks lurking

    Why do most of you feel so threatened and bothered by good looking girls? When I see a hot guy in a movie or show, nothing about it bothers me. I’d prefer to look at him over an ugly guy. I know I’m not attractive. What he looks like doesn’t hurt my feelings or make me jealous.

    Why do you always try to tear down attractive women and guys attracted to them?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      That question is completely pointless to ask here. The femanons who post here are likely not the kind of women calling for this. In general most women are great about hyping up prettier, sexier women- and in the converse, the most vicious about destroying women they find ugly or weird. The kind of people doing this are management types who are just bitter to the core.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      Does it bother you when a hot guy gets the girl instead of the ugly guy?

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        No. When big homie gets laid it feels like the whole squad got laid. I’m supposed to hate bro for piping a bop?

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          Based. I was expecting an incel response.

          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous

            Yea instead you got a twitter response fr no cap

  121. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    It is extremely funny that Twitter commies unironically come to Cinemaphile and try to engage with anons.

  122. 6 days ago
    Boco

    Disney can't die fast enough.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >believing this moronic bait
      you’re better than that Boco (not much, but still a little)

  123. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >The girl we hired to play her in the parks refused to continue sucking off the Park Executives so they fired her and we can't find anyone hot, talented enough to play the character well, and willing to keep the blowjob train coming

  124. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    This sort of thing annoys me, but more for how much ammo it gives to the sort of people who think it's the death of western civilization. I think some anons earlier in this thread totally called it, this is just something they were already going to do anyway for budget and promotional reasons and they just wanted some noble-sounding excuse for it. It's not because purple-haired hordes hung tinkerbell in fricking effigy, Tink's basically an icon for the big-butt crowd, you see her on ghetto clothes almost as much as looney tunes characters. Again, the Peter Pan movie is already in lockup for that racist-ass indian song. But I'll guarantee you they won't go to the trouble of removing her from the ride. It's not as simple as removing that song from the soundtrack.

    tldr it's just frickin' bait man who gives a shit. the more crying from the right they get the more free press they get

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      It's kinda weird that black tinkerbell was funded and completely fine to produce but white tinkerbell coincidentally wasn't. Listen man, most people are aware of DEI, ESG, SBI, or whatever form this shit takes now, even average people are aware of this, and nobody wants it in anything ever. It just corrodes the integrity of everything.

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        no, you’re just a moron

        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous

          >no rebuttal
          I accept your concession.

  125. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine showing up to work one day and they fire you because your body isn't realistic enough.

  126. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Where was the plug originally inserted and why?

  127. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    I thought she was cute.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous
      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous
        • 6 days ago
          Anonymous
          • 6 days ago
            Anonymous
    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      FRICK. That ugly Brittish git's genes really did a number on Mila's kid. Also sure, that black woman is hot, but why the frick is she playing Tinker Bell, a character who isn't black? And she certainly isn't hot enough for anyone to watch that awful movie.

  128. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    My patience and tolerance for minorities is running extremely thin.
    Anyone who isn't a straight white cis man better watching your fricking backs, because the Day of the Rope is coming.

  129. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    I am so goddamn sick of this woke/PC culture bullshit. It's all become so ingrained into society now that it's more or less become law. Where in the frick did society go so wrong to allow these mentally-insane snowflakes to govern everything??

  130. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Lot of confusion about puritans on all sides. They were a politically left-wing group compared to the society they lived in, but they were simultaneously more sexually and religiously conservative than the society they lived in. Also, their ideological descendants currently rule the world through elite American universities that gatekeep elite status in America. Almost all Ivy League schools have very strong and sometimes explicitly Puritan roots

  131. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    I remember how Disney made a huge deal about that direct-to-video series of Tinkerbell.

    What the hell happened to cause this shit?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      "We're retiring the actress to free up a spot for someone else but we want to spin it as some noble bullshit"

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >Wickeb

  132. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    cause you’re stupid, stop browsing /misc/

  133. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Did Disney completely forget that the Tinkerbell in the parks is their 2000s/2010s version of her where she's a headstrong girlboss who don't need no man?

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      That's why it's obvious marketing spin bullshit. Anyone who thinks disney actually cares about any of this shit is a fool giving them free publicity. The more people feed into the narrative by complaining about disney getting "woke", the more they get to act like heroes. This is some cheap restructuring shit that they're passing off as body positivity.

      Dreamworks beat them to that punch by 20 years with Shrek.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      That's a lot of shit, 7 fricking movies? Why the hell did they cancel the series? Not profitable enough?

      • 6 days ago
        Anonymous

        Toys stopped selling.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      You expect the people that run Disney to actually know their own characters?

  134. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    I was in a local comic shop and a couple of older women were talking about this bullshit. One was the owner. She said she was sick of this woke Disney bullshit and they said how it was just probably a handful out loudmouthed people trying to get their way. She also said they really enjoy ordering Zenscope pinup stuff which goes way further than anything in Disney parks.

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      >older women
      >comic book shop
      calling bullshit

  135. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Tinkerbell is so fricking sexy bros

  136. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    No good can come of this.
    >Coming next: no good comes of this
    I don't care what they think they're doing, this won't stick. Tinkerbell is a cute buxom blonde, deal with it.

  137. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    tinkerbell being CANCELLED OH MY GOD PLEASE NO NOT THIS ANYTHING BUT THIS!??? Who gives a frick about this non character. A meaningless emblem slapped on t shirts and coffee mugs with the same amount of worth as the logo on the packaging of a store brand.

  138. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    it's because of her distinctly Nordic / Aryan facial structure.

    There's nothing israelites hate more than signs of pure whiteness.

  139. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    i dont care if this is real or fake
    i'm tired of hearing about shit like this in general

  140. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    >skinny
    >white
    >blonde

    Yeah, that would definitely offend the morbidly obese mutts. I'm glad disney made this move to combat racism and fatphobia. If you think being skinny and white is okay, then that is a mighty YIKES from me.

  141. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Heterosexual attractive white girl=LE BAD

  142. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    Someone make the next thread

    • 6 days ago
      Anonymous

      no, everyone is a fricking moron

  143. 6 days ago
    Anonymous

    143642759
    chirst you're a moron

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *