Disney is pulling the plug on Tinkerbell.
RIP 1953-2024
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Disney is pulling the plug on Tinkerbell. RIP 1953-2024
Disney is pulling the plug on Tinkerbell.
RIP 1953-2024
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Not Cinemaphile
>Tinkerbell
>not Cinemaphile
Looks like a real person in op to me
Still a cartoon character.
This thread isn't about Tink. It's about bashing Disney and the values of "The Left".
This thread is NOT Cinemaphile.
So it's about Tinkerbell and the company that created her most recognizable depiction. You're just unhappy with the reaction and want to shut it down.
I'm tired of these shit threads and all the shit crossboarders.
>unrealistic body image
I'm convinced that this is just jealous b***hes and people pandering such trying to make people women feel bad for being hot. And I definitely mean "women," because no one calls depictions of men "unrealistic" even when they look like the most roided-out beastman you've ever seen.
>a character prominently known from a classic animated movie
>not Cinemaphile
Then literally what is?
The publication's name is right in the screenshot.
>make people women
God damn, I need to up my proofreading...
>And I definitely mean "women," because no one calls depictions of men "unrealistic" even when they look like the most roided-out beastman you've ever seen. And they have women regularly try to dry hump and paw anyone from The Prince to Gaston.
Don't hear much about that Cept from the Cast members that have to deal with it.
>I'm convinced that this is just jealous b***hes
It's almost always jealous ugly and/or fat b***hes behind this kind of shit. Pretty women don't give a shit, they literally dress up as these kinds of characters.
>I'm convinced that this is just jealous b***hes and people pandering such trying to make people women feel bad for being hot. And I definitely mean "women," because no one calls depictions of men "unrealistic" even when they look like the most roided-out beastman you've ever seen.
What gets me is that I when I see stuff like He-Man get brought up as kind sexist, I've seen women call it a "power fantasy". Okay, then is dressing up as fricking Stripperella a power fantasy then?!
If it's belittling to somebody than don't fricking try and sugar coast it
>Okay, then is dressing up as fricking Stripperella a power fantasy then?!
Yes, because women use their sexuality to make men do whatever they want. That's their power. So being hot is the power fantasy.
That's why so many female fighters use whips
You can't talk about cosplayers in Cinemaphile.
Stunning and brave
Gonna take a lot of people clapping to make this version to fly again.
Parkshit threads belongs on Cinemaphile but mods refuse to kill/move them.
Who tf goes to Cinemaphile?
It's a ghost town of a board.
Barely clears 20 posts an hour on a good day
>Disney parks are all based on Cinemaphile properties
>not Cinemaphile
There is always some seething junior mod (likely a troony too) trying to patrol this board. They come and go. Dont mind them.
Just give her a bulge and facial hair. It’ll be fine.
The fact this is a fp bot shows that it is and the israelites are scared.
I don't care
Why post then?
Nobody asked dipshit.
Because you're a homosexual.
You cared enough to post here.
>It's real
>It's in Disney "WORLD" and not Land (yet)
You've got to be fricking kidding me
An unrealistic body image that's been easily portrayed by 20 something women for the last 70 years?
Blue hair wails mad that a woman is both nice in manner and attractive.
Guess they rather watch more brawls
>Tinkerbell
>a woman who got so jealous she had Wendy SHOT and almost fall to her death
>nice in manner
What Disney is doing is bullshit but C'MON anon.
>nice in manner
stop thinking with your balls anon, she was awful in peter pan (haven't seen her 3d movies though)
Being a fricking sphere is an unrealistic body image and yet ham planets expect us to tolerate that shit.
>unrealistic
they really hate normal women dont they
its crazy how these "people" think
telling girls they cant be pretty or princesses
to not take care of their body but instead to hurt themselves
New tinkerbell will be fat and wearing pants
Source? Not that I couldn't believe it but I don't care what the trannies on twitter are saying, I want it straight from the Vermin's syphilitic sore-ridden mouth.
Dude trust me.
>The move from Disney comes after it confirmed her disappearance from meet-and-greets at the resort in February.
>Tinker Bell has reportedly faced scrutiny from Disney’s Stories Matter team ahead of the debut of Disney+ in 2019. The team reportedly flagged and labeled the character to Disney executives as "potentially problematic," claiming that she is “body conscious” and “jealous of Peter Pan’s attention,” according to a 2022 report from The New York Times.
>Disney’s Stories Matter team was developed to spot and correct “negative depictions of people and cultures” in Disney’s products.
>“We are reviewing our offerings beyond the screen, which include products, books, music and experiences,” reads the Stories Matter homepage on Disney’s website. “While advisories for negative depictions of people and cultures may be added to some offerings, others will be reimagined. We are also investing in new ways to better reflect the rich diversity of stories in our world. This work is ongoing and will evolve as we strive toward a more inclusive tomorrow.”
https://www.thestreet.com/travel/disney-world-cuts-classic-character-from-meet-and-greets-amid-scrutiny
>faced scrutiny from Disney’s Stories Matter team
is this the same team that censored the Life of times of Scrooge McDuck for being racist?
>is this the same team that censored the Life of times of Scrooge McDuck for being racist?
Yes! After everything Disney has done and how they treat originality (especially when they chose Bob Iger from chosen people again), it's time to boycott that evil and corrupt company of today called Disney!
If necessary, burn that company to the ground! Boycott Disney! Boycott!
Fricking miserable c**ts.
These people are mentally ill.
It's an excuse. They want to get rid of older characters for more newer ones from Pixar and CG movies.
>Disney’s Stories Matter team
Sounds like a pretty good grift. You just keep making up the next "problem" in line and you're never out of a job.
Imagine getting paid to b***h about what bothers you. And 99% of those complaints are just rephrasing "good character is too skinny, too attractive, too white" and "bad character is too fat, too ugly, and too brown," with the solution being "make good characters fat, ugly, and brown" and "make bad characters skinny, attractive, and white."
How the frick do I get this job?
https://storiesmatter.thewaltdisneycompany.com/
Look at the film critics group in the bottom who make up the board. Try to parasitise one of those.
>AAFCA encourages diversity and inclusion within the film and TV industry with a particular emphasis on the Black experience.
> CAPE champions diversity by educating, connecting and empowering Asian Americans
> Define American uses media and the power of storytelling to shift the conversation about immigrants
>The Geena Davis institute is the only research-based organization working collaboratively within the entertainment industry to create gender balance
> GLAAD is a dynamic media force rewriting the script for LGBTQ acceptance, provoking dialogue that supports cultural and narrative change
> Hollywood, Health & Society (HH&S) is a program of the USC Annenberg Norman Lear Center that informs and inspires accurate storylines on topics including health and medicine, social justice,
>IllumiNative increases the visibility of Native Nations and peoples in American society and challenges existing negative narratives.
>The National Association of Latino Independent Producers stands as the premier Latinx media organization, addressing the largest ethnic minority community in the country.
“largest ethnic minority” pick one.
> RespectAbility fights stigmas and advances opportunities so people with disabilities can fully participate in all aspects of community.
Tinkerbutt
Ironically Tinkerbell's body type is popular now so her body consciousness is a non issue.
nice straw moron
No lie detected.
Just because it leaves out some subtleties with its brevity, doesn't mean it's not true.
moron.
I'm sorry, clearly moron was too much of a compliment to you, I meant to say braindead
>to you
You seem to be under the mistaken impression that I was the anon you called a moron in the first place.
You know what happens when you assume, right?
>white people go around for 1000 years killing and dominating the world
>now they cry about wokeism and make cartoons because movies have women and black ppl in them
master race lmao
>white people go around for 1000 of years spreading civilization to savages
>Black folk and shit skins are allowed some power and ruin centuries of civilization
wow, you're moronic
That anon is a frogposter, that goes without saying
>prequelgay complaining about the franchise being ruined
Ahahahahaha
Now you know what it's like
You deserve to suffer
Do little girls really think about this stuff? If I was showing a kid Peter Pan, Tinkerbell being "problematic" wouldn't cross my mind at all... Tinkerbell also has her own media independent from Peter Pan, correct?
Female brains are wired differently from male brains.
When a guy sees an awesome guy, he thinks “Hell yeah. Literally me!”.
When a girl sees a beautiful girl, she thinks “Stupid c**t! She’s not the pretty one! I AM! Only people who look exactly like ME are attractive!”.
The Ancient Greeks actually wrote about this. How in a society ruled by women all men would be forced to frick ugly women first and pretend they’re just as attractive.
Ever notice how females CONSTANTLY give each other bullshit compliments? Like they will call legit burn victims and deformed abominations and whales “Gorgeous”? But if you compare them in seriousness “Wow. You look JUST LIKE that troony you called beautiful a hour ago!” they get offended? It’s like that.
Bot post, bait or moronic?
This stuff has been parroted so much, yet it always gets proven wrong when the numbers and actions come out.
What the frick is going on where fricking Tinkerbell and Doctor Suess books are called "inappropriate" and get banned but homosexuals selling rainbow-colored dicks in front of kids is A-OK?
>selling rainbow-colored dicks in front of kids
Where? I haven't seen this one
Happens during gay pride events in some places. But followup belongs straight to pol. Unless you're looking to buy a rainbow dick, in which case I suggest Bad Dragon as a starting point.
not that other anon but
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11517503/Dean-Chicago-school-says-students-shown-dildos-butt-plugs-teaching-queer-sex.html
A lot of sex ed expansions in general are jaw droppingly weird to me now.
Like in the mid 10s you basically had
>"Changes in your body"
>The reproductive system
>Protection
>Birth control methods
>STI education and when to get checked
>Discussing consent and boundaries
Admittedly, I feel weird about sex toys because the general gist of sex ed is "Look, we know you're gonna do it, we're showing you safety then we all get to go home"
So I can definitely see how teaching kids about sex toys, particularly those designed for insertion, is important considering the number of hospital stories there are regarding this. At the same time, I feel like that's a matter of just showing the object on the desk and some infographics
>At the same time, I feel like that's a matter of just showing the object on the desk and some infographics
For that, it should be more like a shop class safety video showing the various injury types that are possible.
I'd add size chart sheets too. For instance, the vegana can take a lot, it is built to do that but if we're talking someone who wants to try anal insertion, that's a different story.
That's the hard part about sex ed in the post internet era. There's more and more stuff that teens wanna try because they have more knowledge of it than in previous generations, and in turn, teaching the safety prodedures becomes more and more awkward.
If someone brought butt plugs and dildos to my high school we would have gone crazy and I guarantee they would have been stolen and used for pranks
Heterosexual attractive women =LE EVIL INSTRUMENT OF THE PATRIARCHY
>Fat blag nonbinary gay buttplug using homosexuals are le heckin wholesome and valid
frick, I meant to reply to
I know it's a meme to say but we are actively in our Weimer Republic arc. Sadly I don't think we're gonna get out of it unscathed, we're probably heading towards a molasses slow societal collapse like Rome had. No cool riots in the street or way to fight back, just watching as rights and beliefs we once held to be self evident get eroded and the cost of living progressively gets worse and worse until there is no middle class and the average wage can never ever buy a halfway decent house or vehicle. Hell is entropy, and right now we're living in it, baby
True, but people are getting more rowdy it seems. I think things are going to be alright in the future but there's going to be quite a bit of violence. Hopefully Davos and the WEF bites the bullet during it.
It only feels slow because we're watching it play out in real time. Rome took more than a century to collapse, and it had several close calls along the way.
This is really "waning days of the Roman Republic", so if we're lucky we at least get to transform to a stylish Empire for a few centuries
The Western Roman Empire was a dirt poor feudal Christian theocracy, idiot.
And here comes the Yank Nazi claiming the Weimar Republic was some massive left wing orgy run by israeli people until Hitler saved Germany
And here comes the man living on planet moron that acts like it wasn't a gigantic depression with rampant child prostitution in the larger cities. Real fricking chin scratcher how I didn't even mention israelites and you bring them up, nor did i even say anything positive about Hitler, only that we're in a very similar situation to the Republic and the latter era of Rome. Do your parents a favor and tell them you love them. I'd normally tell a dipshit like you to kill themselves but I'm trying to be a better man and avoid flippant statements like that, gay boy.
>Tinker Bell has reportedly faced scrutiny from Disney’s Stories Matter team ahead of the debut of Disney+ in 2019. The team reportedly flagged and labeled the character to Disney executives as "potentially problematic," claiming that she is “body conscious” and “jealous of Peter Pan’s attention,” according to a 2022 report from The New York Times.
The Swedt Baby Inc DEI consultants of Disney. These morons are also responsible for the shitshow that is Wish
At this point "problematic" just means "heterosexual".
THE QUOTE IS IN THE OP? HOW moronic ARE YOU?
>THE QUOTE IS IN THE OP? HOW moronic ARE YOU?
the OP pic is a literally-who on facebook quoting an unnamed 'disney rep'
thats not a source. link the interview the quote is from or something, or name the disney rep.
You don’t understand how sources work.
Thinkerbutt
Oh my fricking god I hate disney so god damn much
Too many girls expressed an interest to be 5 inches tall?
If this is real, and I have no reason to believe it is real and not just more outrage farming, it's probably more likely due to the rampant sexual harassment like what happened to the Jasmines and that one Gaston.
This is insane. I saw at least 30 different women on tiktok that had those same proportions and aesthetics.
>that one Gaston
The one who left the role and does gay porn now?
>A few self hating women complained so we're censoring her for the "modern audience"
Yeah nobody was offended by Tinkerbell frick off.
Tinkerbell is kill?
no
Unpopular opinion but I think the Tinkerbell from "Fox's Peter Pan and the pirates" was the best one
the one from the 90s anime is probably the worst by far design wise, plus all the pirates on that show looked like proto One Piece characters
She cute
That’s awesome. Is that a bubblegum card?
Yeah, Disney actually tried to shut down production of Fox's Peter Pan cartoon since they basically think they own Peter Pan, they sued them twice
yet they had no problem with the 1989 Peter Pan anime because it was made outside the States, I guess
>Disney representatives: Tinkerbell can't be a woman in your show because that was Disney's idea, she can only be a light with wings however
>Fox representatives: Tinkerbell is a girl, the original BOOK says so
Looks like that 90s anime version of The Life and Adventures of Santa Claus
When the anime original character is the cutest
>Takes over Hook's role as the main antagonist of the show during the second half
The show is actually great if you get past some of the designs, this anime and Fox's "Peter Pan & The Pirates" series are way better than the Disney movie IMO (Disney's Tinkerbell is hot still)
FOX's Captain Hook was the most threatening out of all the animated Captain Hooks (the anime one had a mecha and was a confirmed pedo, but he was too silly to take seriously)
?si=CKaqexeVd8Ox9wFL
damn fine representation of Ol' Captain Hook.
?si=ZS_20BR0Jq1zvk5s
Tim Curry has portrayed two of the most iconic pirates in Literature. This can't be a coincidence.
He's not actually that threatening in the original book. He's so stricken with stage fright (the best term to use; he exists to play a part in a childish fantasy) after his men capture Peter that he's noticably damp with sweat and is embarrssed when Peter notices.
>It was also the only one of the "World Masterpiece Theater" productions to be broadcast on TV in the UK. No Japanese names can be found in the staff credits at this time, and even on the subtitle screen, the name of the screenwriter of the English version is written in large letters: "written by Melora Harte".
lmao
Were they bragging that they were anime but made by Westerners essentially?
Art design reminds me of that one movie Cat-Napped!! Must be the same studio.
It's not the same studio, it's the same character designer: Takashi Nakamura.
Soul
Japan really liked the Wizard of Oz, they adapted it 5 times, 2 as part of anime anthology series (1978 & 1995), 1 as an anime movie (1982) and 2 as an anime series (1986 and 1992)
Good taste
I recognize Doritha
Tin Man was carrying the team hard, the Lion didn't do shit after the first arc
Dumbelina, more like. She definitely looks like she's got an extra chromosome.
>that raccoon frick
I remember seeing his ass get beaten in saltybet. Frick you for spamming your washbear super.
But she's not even embonpoint!
I found a picture of the author
THICC
>embonpoint
Note that Embonpoint in 1902 is VERY different, where you can see 1902's wollds fattest man in any walmart.
Fox Tinkerbell is pretty skinny, anon.
She looks like a mage. Does she cast any spells, other than Greater Dick Enlargement?
>plus all the pirates on that show looked like proto One Piece characters
Shit, you are right!!
Always felt there was something off about them, now I know what! Thanks.
>Unpopular opinion
Not sure if it is accurate to say it is "unpopular". Sure, Disney Tink is far thiccer, but I think Fox Tink is cuter, so it is reduced to a matter of personal taste.
Peter Pan and the Pirates is truly a gem. For me there is no better Hook than Tim Curry.
>Unpopular opinion but I think the Tinkerbell from "Fox's Peter Pan and the pirates" was the best one
Fox's Peter Pan was great but my dick will always point toward Loisel's Tinkerbelle because she looks like a saucy latina who would give you footjobs while calling you a good boy.
Not enough black or Latina or israeli.
I'd be game with her having that frazzled israelite hair and huge breasts. Though, she'd be nagging, well, worse than any other woman nags.
If the breasts are good enough I can deal with the nagging.
Don't even care about the redesign but the term "for modern audiences" just pisses me off so bad. It's just so fricking stupid.
Good. Kid me had to hide his boner whenever I saw those tinkerbell mascots. Finally young boys can go to Disney world in peace.
This sounds like a hoax
haven't they removed Jasmine?
would you take your daughter there?
in an imaginary scenario were you arent broke an ugly and have children
would ou take her there? whats the best alternative?
>they're removing her because she's white
Believe me, they would've just said that if that was the case. Also
Ten years ago---hell, half that, even---it would've been.
>Believe me, they would've just said that if that was the case
It's cute you still think Disney would be that transparent with the public.
Of course, it'd be couched in "pro-Diversity™" language, but if it was the case, that's how they'd put it.
If they really believed this, they'd start hiring 250 pound girls to play Ariel and Cinderella.
Anaheim dweller here. COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED RUMOR is that it's because Disney is having more GHETTO ASS BULLSHIT problems, and they're happening to tinkerbell.
Some fricker trying to sexually harass the tink for their tiktok.
Some THOT taking issue with HER MAN paying too much attention to tinkerbell's bells.
The speculated plan is to keep Tink up and away and out of hair weave pulling range.
Vid only vaugely related.
There was a BIG internal slapfight on whether they wanted black ariel or not.
Many were FIRED.
So this is the original article making the claim:
https://www.news-journal.com/arena/thestreet/disney-world-cuts-classic-character-from-meet-and-greets-amid-scrutiny/article_1da7eaa6-a95f-5ebf-a0ca-a166d4f7e166.html
and this is the source they cite:
https://plandisney.disney.go.com/question/why-tinkerbell-no-longer-meet-greet-plans-bring-back-567110/
Said source only says that Tinkerbell isn't currently doing standard walk-around meet and greets due to the rotating cast of meet and greet characters. She does still appear in the parade and other scheduled attractions.
TLDR: its ragebait bullshit.
If it's all the same to you we're gonna do 500 posts on the lie instead, cool?
You know I thought you were joking earlier
The “original article making the claim” is Chris Williams, and it’s very much real
facebook DOT com SLASH groups/1247563199057863/permalink/1866725977141579/
Castrate yourselves, american disneytroons
you first moron
>A guy on facebook said it so it's true
Bro.
Oh, so it was bullshit the entire time.
Ah, so its ragebait bs that some youtubers are gonna make ai reaction images for and b***h about it long enough to monetize, right?
Tink shouldn't have said the n word if she didn't want to be cancelled.
S.
How the frick is tinker bell even offensive anyways? And why the frick does disney continue to do bullshit like pander to these extremely offended morons when all it does is self destruct their image more?
She looks like this.
Ass could be bigger
>unrealistic body image
No shit. She was like less than 10 inches tall so of course she will be an unrealistic standard for women/girls.
>Hello, average-looking woman in the photo who looks a bit like Barbara Windsor! You're too problematic with your body type! Could you please put on 50 pounds? This whole redesign is important to stop making kids of FOUR worried about body image, which is totally a thing they think about, and not just a cynical attempt by myself to re-invent the fricking wheel and shift larger sized clothe cause kids are getting fater
You're out of a job and we're not making clothes for starving kids with dstended stomachs even though they make the clothes, but progress is progress! Yay!
Up where they walk
Up where they run
A week's wage of just one Pound, thirty-one,
Making fat Disney clothes, that's woke I suppose,
In the third world.
>problematic image for…young girls
>young girls
*adult hambeasts
Tinker Bell is a magical fricking cartoon creature. Outside of that, she’s not even all that unrealistically built. She probably actually resembles what these seething cows might look like had they not totally given up. They are jealous of a goddamn cartoon character.
They might have misworded that a big. Young girls actually like pretty girls and fairies. It's angry single 40 something white women that enrage at the concept of a woman that weighs less than 300lbs as an unrealistic body image.
Is Disney not paying attention to the fact that they're losing tons of money.
Tinkerbell was flat. Ask Pam.
>verification not required
Fricking lies
heres the full clip btw. Is Tommy right? Was Peter Pan gay?
Nope. Next question.
>Tinkerbell was flat.
What? Didn't her parents take her to the theatre to watch the film?
Oh, right...
>webm brokes
What?
How did I never notice this? Also I find it weird they gave her a large ass when in the 1940s large asses weren't in vogue. Large asses only became popular in the 90s when rap became mainstream
"Large asses" weren't in vogue but men have always like large hips, which tends to mean wide if not bubbly asses.
Tink being meant to be more comically cute than classy meant she didn't have to have princess proportions with thin, delicate features.
Intriguing. So it's not really about her ass, it's just her hips that are large? We're large hips considered cute but not ideal?
Her ass would still be wide thanks to the hips, fashion of the 20th century generally favored slender figures for women which is why you see so many things from those years of women disliking having a big butt. Big hips was generally coded for liking a nice ass too, but more of a pert and well shaped one over a large, bubble butt.
Martin's right here, Tinkerbell has a pretty nice ass.
Not super big or anything, but nice and shapely, the perfect amount of plumpness.
No proper 35mm scan
Wow cool something in media that mentioned that
True but it’s weord on what’s allowed or not. Is this bad or just considered a joke cause. I don’t think it’s ever been censored and the new featurette on the new dvd mentions her having a body.it was just on free-form but didn’t see if it was censored
>you guys are really sitting here talking about cartoon character's bodies?
Gods, if only she knew how bad things would become
Hoodrats don't own Dat Ass.
It started with Barbie Dolls, it was eventually going to make it's way into other forms of media. No matter how much these people try to sweep fictional beauty under the rug, they can't change the beauty standards within our minds. It all just means we're reverting back to what was a thing in century's past.
>outrage clickbait from unsourced D-list blog """news"""
Why's it always shit like this and why do morons fall for it every time.
>unsourced
The name of the source is right there, in the form of a watermark.
Disney is desperately trying to create an audience consisting entirely of trannies and ugly homosexuals.
Well they already have them playing The Evil Queen.
Disney knows that Blackrock ESG money is their only reliable source of income now. Their high executives can no longer afford their yatch parties and private jets from box office and licensing deals alone.
>Blackrock ESG
god you’re moronic
stop posting on Cinemaphile, larry fink
this isn’t your normal every day moronation, this is advanced moronation
You still haven't explained how esg has nothing to do with disney, moron.
But anon, the cbs has dei the fbi in the cia and the rip is going to dip the afk lol the crt will esg the pbs and then they'll jfk the rpa
it's all so fricking simple you feebs
I'm glad I'm not a girl growing up in the modern age, being told it's wrong to be feminine. No wonder so many of them turn ftm now and are willing to cut off their breasts because tiktok said so.
I'm surprised they're still on the woke train considering it's been the main cause of all their flops.
Once you reach a certain level in a corporation, make connections and friends etc, you basically become unfireable.
It's because the veteran employees and non-woke people keep walking out (e.g. what happened to the original team working on Wish).
I'm convinced this whole woke thing from Disney is a streamlining scheme
Think about it, once all differentiation between characters is achieved, all they'll have to animate is stick figures, allowing them to churn out content for pennies on the dollar. Once everything but the most basic humanoid form is outlawed, their cost-profit ratio might finally even out.
But people don't want that. Human beings operate mostly on aesthetics. We like things that look good.
I never said it wasn't moronic, just that Disney wants all standards erased so they can spit in their consoomers mouthes and get paid for it.
Then why do so many men have an asian fetish?
I think when people identify as commies, talk like commies, and behave like commies, it's not unreasonable to assume they're doing commie shit.
>woke
moron
this isn't 1960 anymore grandpa
I was in Disney World last year and they were selling race swapped princess dolls in one of the MGM stores near tower of terror. Strangely, they actually had some Jasmine dolls that were swapped to being white or at least white looking
Isn’t tinker bell flying over the park a big deal at these places? Haven’t been since I was a kid but I vaguely remember that.
The reason they’re mad is because Peter has the power in their relationship. Her design isn’t sexy enough for troons and postgraduate fat women to get mad about. Honestly surprised more ire isn’t directed at Peter who acts like a proud and red blooded troll. Kinda like what Cinemaphileers want to be like except he does it in real life
>looking female is no longer an achievable standard
LGBT told us they just wanted to get married and nothing else. Why did they go on to frick up literally everything in our society?
Narcissistic people who can't have their own children, they want to take it out on everyone else.
>Why did giving attention seeking perverts what they want lead to them finding even more moronic ways to seek attention?
Turns out that people who like to eat poop are not mentally well. Who could have known?
Nah, this is a woman thing not a gay thing. it’s jealous straight chicks who are mad at cartoons
What the frick is this meme? Gays CONSTANTLY cry about fanservice but than turn around to fellate hot men. You can see this blatant hypocrisy on social media all the time.
Yes, women and feminists are a much bigger culprit, but tons of gays go along with it since many of them are also progressives.
Sorry for the /misc/ but ti's just a lie to say gays also aren't doing this.
>Gays CONSTANTLY cry about fanservice
I've never seen even a single case of this ever happening, ever.
Gays don't care and lesbians / bis like it. It's straight women and sociopathic billionaires that pull this shit.
Anon, I'm sorry to say gays have woman brain. It's been like this from the start.
>LAST NIGHT I POURED COFFEE ON MY TROUSERS AND IT’S THE GAYS WHO WERE AT FAULT! FACT!!!
This isnt gays this is jealous fatties
This is simply puritanism dressed in a progressive veneer, the idea of ethical capitalism or "capitalism with a human face" is sadly not a new concept. What we are seeing is the culmination of an unholy marriage between compassionate liberal conservatism and vague progressivism. This shit has been decades in the making, LGBT groups are being taken for a ride as much as everyone else.
Dumb frogposter
This is the fat acceptance movement pushing this crap. You know the same fricks saying its ok to be 5'4, 250lb, eat what you want, exercise once a week, and push the EXTRA THICK memes on Cinemaphile?
>an attractive woman is unrealistic
What makes you think gays and bis want any of this? We hate this crap too.
>What makes you think gays and bis want any of this? We hate this crap too.
that has nothing to do with gays and bis, nice try, snowflake
it's not LGBT who do that, it's corporations, who use LGBT flag to push their own agendas
Turns out if was a slippery slope after all.
This isn't the gays, moronic frogposter. It's the israelites at disney going for the brownie points
>This isn't the gays, moronic frogposter. It's the israelites
Same thing
Jews.
How the hell does two men getting married have anything to do with Disney thinking Tinkerbell is problematic?
They had plenty of varied characters in Tinkerbell's world to play around with. They just needed to present them to audiences, not kill the movies for a decade and then decide that Iridessa's fat cousin should be Tinkerbell now.
>Never gonna have that solo movie of the super cute asian water fairy
It fricking hurts bros
Another thing trying to be ruined by stupid annoying complaints from snowflakes thst have to ruin stuff for others just cause they don’t
I'm going to to pull Tinkerbell's plug if you know what I'm saying!
NO!!!!
What will the loose portion of women at my work dress up as now on Halloween that still gets family friendly approval?
>using the phrase "updated for modern audiences"
>people are believing this literally who on facebook
I would love to bang one of those women
At this point I don’t know how Iger was voted back on. The man must hate making money. Seriously can’t the major investors just kick him out?
He led a woke rebellion against Chapek.
Isn't the whole appeal of Tinkerbell that she's a complete b***h and you can sell her crossing her arms and being smug to whoever reads your shirt? Isn't that what everyone fricking worships about girl characters now?
Some random fat dyke complained so a multi-billion dollar company will pull the character for being wrongbad and lose millions of dollars because fat dykes are clearly their target demographic.
i remember the meet and greet with tinkerbell in pixie hollow the most from my disneyland trip as a toddler. i was awkward, blonde, and didn't fit in- like tinkerbell in the 3d movies. i saw myself in her and i was so excited to see her. she's a great character. while i'm not as pretty as her, i still love her personality because it was never about LOOKING like her. i still cherish that memory and i'm disappointed that children won't have the same opportunity i had.
First Peter Pan gets fricked over (look it up), then Tinkerbell.
Of course her body image is fricked up, Tinkerbell was never 5'+ ever.
No child would mistake this hoe for Tinkerbell, she's jus there for male visitors to leer at.
>unrealistic body image
>show a photo of a real woman playing the character
Nani? How is it unrealistic if it’s super easy to find an actress to play the character?
Anon, you're using basic logic. Don't do that. Bad Anon!
they already ban cleavage from adult cartoons what the frick am i supposed to be happy about in this world
This smells like bullshit even if it is real. Tink had her own fricking movies completely removed from Peter Pan. Modern kids are more likely to know her from those anyway. So what? The original movie was probably locked in the Vault for HOKUM SMOKUM PEACEY PIPUM RED MAN bullshit anyway. Why would Tink's portrayal in it weigh on anything?
Gosh, and you say the parks are bleeding money and attendance is the lowest it has ever been since the inception of the company?
I wonder why.
>Gosh, and you say the parks are bleeding money
But that's basically impossible..
>and attendance is the lowest it has ever been since the inception of the company?
Lol, are you trying to wish this into reality? They had a poor couple years due to international travel not rebounding as fast post-Covid, but 2024 is already setting records.
I mean I am sure they will be defunct in two more weeks!
>But that's basically impossible..
So impossible, in fact, that Star Wars Galaxies cost Disney $300 million and had to be shut down.
Bro I was there like a couple months ago. Place was fricking packed.
Tinkerbell having wide hips is as the author envisioned it.
Yes I like this. You won't have anything Cinemaphile and you will still keep pumping money. Tiana will get an ovation. All females will be covered up like Jessica Rabbit and the Red Head and you aren't allowed to ogle them. Star Wars and Marvel will continue to dominate the parks. Synergy between films will expand even more in the parks. And you will buy it all up.
>And you will buy it all up.
No, I don't think I will
I remember a few years ago they announced a Jessica Rabbit something or other and an anon correctly predicted they’d have her solving a mystery or something so they could put her in a trench coat
>muh YOU'LL KEEP BUYING IT cope
I literally haven't purchased a Pokemon product in almost a decade and I haven't consumed a single piece of Marvel media since Endgame. Which I pirated.
I'm willing to bet there are a lot of people like me.
i love this copypasta
Its copypasta? Oh good. Its Scrapper, so I wasn't sure.
It's over
I can't wait for Tinkerbell to be reimagined with a design based on someone like Leslie Jones.
We need to protect the fairies
>unrealistic
They mean her wings.
Maybe women should stop being pretentious and ruining everything, then they'll be given their wings and be freed of their punishment of periods.
Can Disney end yet?
>redesigning updated Tinkerbell for modern audiences
Translation:
We're gonna make her black
And trans.
The fact that they decided a gay should play a "Fairy" shows how out of touch these people are.
Man I had forgot about this shit. They really went to the depths of African jungles to find this witch doctor.
>currently in the process of redesigning an updated Tinkerbell for modern audiences
Ah shit, she’s going to be fat, isn’t she?
Worse. She's going to look like your average rail thin yoga bunny, with an unflattering haircut.
So, when are they kicking Gaston from the Disney parks? Oh yeah, never cause he's a man, and men don't care about crap like that
>disney giving more outrage bait ammo for right wing grifters on youtube
So we're just skipping over how it's a dumb thing and blaming the people rightfully calling out dumb thing? Do you sense a tinge of bias?
>leeeeft wiiiiing goooooooood
>riiight wiiing baaaaaaaaaaad
>leeeeft wiiiiing goooooooood
>right wiiiiiiing baaaaaaaaaaad
That's reductive as shit and not helpful. Stop having issue with calling out bad behavior by your left wing overlords and hold them accountable.
Stop picking sides and pick being right. Which Disney is not.
You poor little soul
corporate shill
I'm not skipping over it. I felt it was addressed adequately in the thread already that I didn't need to mention it. Feeling a bit attacked perhaps?
I have no interest in youtube channels. It's just interesting how the buck is passed. It's not even "equally their fault" it is entirely on disney.
and just as I suspected
It's some big fat hermaphrodite with a Flock-Of-Seagulls haircut and only one nostril
Oh man, I hate it when I'm right
So what fatso within the company started b***hing about this?
are you people stupid or something
Yes. Help us please. There are reasonable people here and we are trapped.
americans never truly got over their puritanical roots
Because morons like
happily drank the kool aid and think establishment puritanism is heckin progressive and edgy. I remember when progressives were actually against censorship but nowadays they gobble it up because it makes them look good to their swaths of moronic "friends" on discord
Anon, You know that posting Pepe the frog on Cinemaphile isn't allowed, I dunno why but that's how it is, I assume he was spammed in the past like the Ponies were
Take it easy
>country dedicated to Black person and troony worship
>"why is this place so puritanical?"
This board is brainrot personified
Two things can be true.
Half the country wants to kill transgender people and lynch black people.
Good
It just switched sides.
At least some of the big companies pushing for this like Sony are suffering.
Hope it was worth it.
>Unrealistic body Image
>They literally have a person with a similar body type and Tinkerbell
This green menace is the #1 mascot of mentally unstable BPD Disney chicks. Every woman I've ever seen who loves tinkerbell has been utterly psychotic and they're proud of it too, they know.
I'm just going to say it's a half truth.
Did you know Tinkerbell is one of the most sexually harassed characters at Disney? She's probably going to get her costume redesigned to be a lot less revealing, like they did to Jasmine, Pocahontas and Tarzan. She's not going anywhere.
Because you can see her panties and delicious fat bum?
I'll miss Tinkerbell's huge ass
Oh boy I can't wait for fat autistic black tinkerbell
I fricking hate modern Disney so much.
So, would this make Tinkerbell public domain?
Peter Pan the story is public domain. You can literally use Tinkerbell for whatever you want, so long as it's not *disney's* tinkerbell.
>unrealistic body image
Just don't eat so much?
You're asking the impossible for the average american
What she should look like after the redesign.
What we will get!
How comes they didnt cancel Taylor Swift for the unrealistic body images?
How is it unrealistic if it's right fricking there.
>We must protect the women by putting them out of jobs
This is booth babes all over again
rancid feminist c**t at Disney malds over attractive female character and puts several pretty girls out of a job over it
what a b***h
This is all Clinton's fault
Unironically, Al Bundy Predicted this since all women these days are a unholy fusion of Meg, Marcy and the Fat women at the shoe store.
Let's see a fresh flow of NSFW Tinker's, that'll show'em.
>unrealistic body image
Yeah... she's a fairy, of course a six inches tall fairy with wings and shit would be considered unrealistic.
Is this bait?
Hahaha
Bullshit, Tink is a money machine for merch
This is going to backfire hard if it's official, which it probably isn't.
This sounds like a repeat of what happened with Miss Bellum in the PPG 2016 shitshow
Not only Miss Bellum, the same happened with the Animaniacs reboot
Minerva a cute
At least they understand Minerva was too hot for TV.
>removing this haughty b***h
Dam shame...
I should try to draw Minerva Mink at some point. But I remember disliking her as a kid. I don't remember any of the skits though, so I'll have to rewatch them.
She has great expressions that they don't normally give to attractive women, which I appreciate, but I do remember her making me feel bad for some reason.
Minerva shows up in 15 episodes plus the movie and that Pinky & The Brain episode playing either secondary or supporting roles, but she only has 2 shorts as the main character "Moon over Minerva" and "Meet Minerva"
Don't trust your kid self, your kid self was a dumbass. I used to loathe a lot of cartoons as a kid that I now love as an adult. And second act break-ups used to stress me out so much, I dreaded re-watching the movies remembering them.
>But I remember disliking her as a kid.
Honestly same boat, but I ended changing my tune, ended up liking haughty girls like Minerva, Brandy and the like. Just knowing that deep in there is a kernel of goodness.
I always found it kinda funny how no matter how many sexy bodies they tried attaching them to, cartoons never managed to make me able to look past the muzzle all furries seem to have. That face just makes me think of a dog and thinking of a dog as sexy just makes me feel gross. Now, you get a furry with like, a little button nose or something or ears and a tail or whatever and we're game, but that trademark furry face just turns me right off.
Weak
Lampshading your horrible choices doesn't excuse your horrible choices.
They made the "we removed Nurse" thing a running gag, good thing this show was cancelled
>original joke was that Heloise was too smart to be just a nurse
>revival twists the joke to imply that women are too moronic to be nurses, a traditionally female role since the beginning of fricking time
The reboot was absolutely fricking garbage. Glad it's dead. Spit on it's fricking grave. What a waste of the OG voice talent.
Russian Hello Nurse is a cute
At least they were smart enough to make her hot, look at that pantyhose and legs
It is funny because men love to be cared for by cute women. It is even better if they are medical professionals. I like how real women to stupid to be a nurse, finds some other reason to remove a character that encourages the nursing field which is dwindling.
>last panel
Is that what was really said? Is that what is really implied? I have never heard anyone interpret the Hello Nurse joke as women are dumb. It seemed to me the butt of the joke was the men being awestruck by a hot nurse. Like a werewolf howling at a singer.
>Is that what was really said?
Yeah
The warners barely ever interacted with Minerva anyway.
Can someone tell Bigdad to hyperfocus on Minerva next? I think it's a lateral move from Pacifica.
They interacted a lot with Minerva during the last 2 seasons once the show moved to KidsWB and they were allowed to use Minerva again, she was in the movie finale too as part of the people trying to get the wishing star and the Pinky & The Brain finale
Damn, Nerva really sticking her girls out here!
Nice.
>How do we fix the supposed sexism towards women?
>Remove them.
"No person — no problem." — Stalin, modern Disney execs.
The Simpsons does the same thing with Apu ever since that documentary made them panic.
Why is it always young girls or women that the world needs to bend over for? At what point will people realize men are so fricked up now is because of how one sided and unfair the balance has become? Boys get zero support and are attacked for their natural behavior. Men are to carry society and constantly being blamed while being demanded more of. Breast cancer foundations and awareness, none for prostate cancer. Women evacuated, men stay to die. Did the marriage fail, well now the man has to pay for it the rest of his life. Men will logically continue to check out, and they will continue to berate and try to punish us for it until one day something breaks.
>Boys get zero support and are attacked for their natural behavior.
Why don’t boys pull themselves up by their bootstraps?
The truth is that nobody expects women to succeed and everybody expects men to, naturally.
They are children and you are the adult, it's incredibly unfair and it's also the truth. You are not equals, that was a lie.
I used to not really think about it, but lately I'm also starting to feel boys and men are getting left behind. One issue that immediately comes to mind is it seems like nobody cares that women are attending college by like a 2:1 ratio, whereas lots of young men are just dropping off the face of the Earth after high school. A bunch of bored young men not doing anything with their lives can't be a good thing to just leave on the back burned like this.
>boo hoo, poor men not selling themselves into debt slavery for a useless degree like women do
You ignored the point entirely. The point is a bunch of young men graduate high school then just frick off afterward, no ambitions or aspirations or anything. They just play video games all day or get high or drunk and work some unfulfilling job. Maybe they never leave their hometown. Having a bunch of men just removing themselves from society like that can't be a good thing to ignore, but everyone just does for some reason.
That's called "living your life" you moronic child. Not everyone has aspirations and even less people achieve them. Some people just want to quietly live their life by working a simple job and enjoying simple hobbies in their free time. And how are women better off? Because they waste 4 years and 400k between the high school and the unfulfilling job steps?
I'm not talking about some schmuck who graduated high school and is now happy to sit on his ass for the rest of his life you fricking idiot. Lots of young men are not content with this lifestyle. That's what I mean. You get a bunch of bored guys who feel like they have no direction in life but who society ignores because it'd much rather focus on women's wellbeing and tells men they're just being pussies if they complain about any problems they're having, then this can lead to some of those young men getting violent as they try to find direction and meaning. It's what leads to strongmen rising to power in fragile countries because they give these young men a cause to fight for.
Wasn't this b***h literally popular enough to have her own cartoon and toyline? Why self sabotage?
It's because most Disney World guests nowadays are fat blacks, isn't it?
>Cinemaphile falls for ragebait bullshit AGAIN
Sometimes I think you just want to be angry and miserable because it's the only time you actually feel something.
It's real, it happened 4 days ago though
I think he means the reasoning. I can't find any actual news sources for this that isn't just right wing outrage bait sites. makes me think there's another reason tinker bell was removed
>“We are reviewing our offerings beyond the screen, which include products, books, music and experiences,” reads the Stories Matter homepage on Disney’s website. “While advisories for negative depictions of people and cultures may be added to some offerings, others will be reimagined. We are also investing in new ways to better reflect the rich diversity of stories in our world. This work is ongoing and will evolve as we strive toward a more inclusive tomorrow.”
https://www.thestreet.com/travel/disney-world-cuts-classic-character-from-meet-and-greets-amid-scrutiny
I'm sure there's another reason as to why they're removing her, but that's what the Disney representatives said
This video is more neutral
Sounds like a combination of budget and wanting to promote newer characters
>Sounds like a combination of budget and wanting to promote newer characters
This seems like the most obvious case.
If it were just about the character's "look", it wouldn't be a problem, because they've already redesigned her for some of her solo movies. Pic related. A new costume and maybe a little bit of rehearsal time for the actresses to "update" her personality to better reflect that version of the character (or something different again), and they'd be good to go.
Tink is one of the classic characters, but it makes sense that they might want to cycle her out with someone a bit more contemporary and relevant.
She's also only gone from the Meet&Greet. Tinkerbelle is still part of other attractions.
They probably took her off the Meet & Greet because of adult men creeping on her
>A new costume and maybe a little bit of rehearsal time for the actresses to "update" her personality to better reflect that version of the character (or something different again), and they'd be good to go.
I don't think they see that as an option, that version of Tinkerbell hasn't had a movie in many years, Disney probably doesn't see as a recognizable character anymore
Sure, but you don't even need to go that far. Just have the "current" version of Tink show up one day wearing a slightly more substantial top, a longer skirt (or morph it into more of a skort), and/or give her green leggings. If the problem was"just" about the character having a "problematic body image", then the cheapest and easiest option requires only a few relatively simple modifications to the wardrobe.
It's overkill to throw out the entire character (at least, from that element of the park) ... unless you wanted to do so already, and wanted to come up with a reason for it which (might) win you some brownie points. Disney theme park fans don't like change, so better to make it sound like you're making a change for noble reasons rather than for marketability.
Indeed. Something is fishy, and something seems to be a play.
If it was just censorship, they could have just altered her outfit. I think they're deliberately making up an excuse to get rid of her.
>More clothes
We are fricking going backwards. We're unironically at the point where Flappers would be considered to risqué for modern audiences. Who is pushing this shit?
Flappers weren’t the standard for how to dress in family friendly children’s media so this whole argument is pants on head level of idiocy. Flappers were also considered decadent and scandalous by the contemporary social standards hence why it was a youthful movement that revolved around getting wasted and dancing at adult parties full of booze and debauchery, it was not a fashion choice for making appearances in child matinees.
>family friendly children’s media
Oh please frick off with your moralgayging and pretending like you suddenly care about purity in children's media. If your ilk did, pic related wouldn't be a thing. You also forget there was a time nobody saw Tinker Bell's outfit as controversial. It's only controversial now because you weirdos are obsessed with the idea that straight men could jack off to her (just like the conservative puritans of the past) and therefore she must be censored.
He's not moralgayging you fricking idiot, he's pointing facts out. The flapper comparison was utterly fricking moronic especially when Walt Disney was notorious for wanting to make his films squeaky clean in terms of content.
>It's a fact because.....JUST BECAUSE IT IS CHUD
He was making a comparison. You nu-puritans want women to go back to the days where they couldn't even show their ankles. Trying to troony logic out of this fact wont work. You unironically proved him right by implying flappers are risqué in your previous post (yes I said you samegay)
Nobody is telling women to cover up. You once again showcase how people like you are reactionary hyperventilating idiots when you think there’s some huge puritanism agenda at play when all this is is family friendly brand corporations wanting to maintain a squeaky clean image and avoid even a slim chance of controversy by preemptively choosing to cover their own ass by removing things they think could he an issue or no long work with their image because x is outdated or negative stereotype, etc.
You can be an adult for two seconds and acknowledge facts or you can be a little b***h who throws tantrums over stupid shit in a way that makes your parents embarrassed that they ever forgot to use a rubber.
>Nobody is
Remember people, when a Leftists uses this phrase, they are lying.
It’s the right who b***h and moan about women needing to cover themselves up. That’s why they do shit like created that takes celebrity women in public functions images and “cleans up” them by putting them in long sleeves and traditional dresses. Utterly hypocritical behaviour because then are also huge coomers and throw tantrums every time they see a woman who isn’t a skinny fashion model getting cast in a movie or tv show because muh beauty, when all they mean is they can’t jerk off to something
>It’s the right who b***h and moan about women needing to cover themselves up. That’s why they do shit like created that takes celebrity women in public functions images and “cleans up” them by putting them in long sleeves and traditional dresses.
Ah yes its the right wing chuds at Marvel doing that, not the pronoun obsessed troons like yourself
That is exactly same case of Disney making sure its content is as inoffensive and clean family fun as possible, you whiny dumbass. They don’t focus on coomers because Disney is about KIDS and incel losers jerking off to cartoons in a smelly basement.
>Troon admits he is concerned about straight men jacking off to non offensive pictures of women hence why women must be in burkas
What's ironic is the only reason you're confused about your gender is porn addiction
Disney does it because they want to sidestep controversy and make their MCU characters as mass-market appeal as possible. But where does that controversy stem from in the first place? Puritanical conservatives wailing about sinful flesh.
For every leftwing dummy on twitter complaining about acceptable body types there is an entire church group who thinks that kids shouldn't know that sex exists at all because otherwise they might be tempted to sin.
Who are you lying to at this point? Its sad. Nobody in 2024 believes Disney gives a damn what "le puritanical conservatives" think. It's you freaks doing the censorship.
>Puritanical conservatives wailing about sinful flesh.
This guy is straight up still living in the 90s. Those kind of people are the last people these media companies are worried about upsetting nowadays.
Media corporations don’t want sex in their products when they’re branded as family friendly because that type of conservative would accuse them of being pedophiles. I mean they do it regardless but companies like Disney want to play it safe. And that’s too hard to accept so instead coomers just whine about the left like morons who only think with their dicks.
It can both be right tbh. The left don't use the same language as the right when they make their complaints. So it's very easy to tell.
Yeah. If it were conservatives, they'd say so. They're not exactly shy about it. And we know Disney does NOT care what conservatives think these days.
But they do want their money, so there is a limit to how much they can drift away from conservative values.
It's funny how libs used to argue prudishness caused sexuality to whiplash and escalate in response, but now that they're the prudes, it's suddenly the other side's fault for sexual extremism and not their own for going ballistic at the slightest titty
>but now that they're the prudes
If you’re a coomer.
>coomer
There you go again being obsessed with what straight men do with their dicks in their own homes.
Journalists HATE sexy women. They all call it "objectification" even when many women don't give a damn. A conservative church mom might complain about things being too sexy, but for a long period of time the powers that think women should cover up are feminists.
Objectification is a thing. There is a difference between male sexism driven nudity vs nudity that’s artistic, body positive and feminist. Coomers only care about the former because it’s about getting needing all media revolve around their penis so that they have endless stream of new masturbation material
>Objectification is a thing.
Stopped reading there.
As a woman, you are biologically dumb.
>coomer this coomer that
Sure coomers want to jerk off to women, but what about non-coomers. People who are not part of the coomer demographic or the woke demographic don't care about Tink looking the way she is.
>objectification is a thing
Sure, but is THIS Tinkerbell objectification? She is wearing a fairy dress. Is her design objectification or is it simply an attractive look? Just because something looks mildly sexy doesn't mean it is objectification. It's not black and white "porn or art". Sometimes it's just curves because it's just there.
>male sexism driven nudity vs nudity that’s artistic
>men vs art
You couldve at least pretended to be unbiased by saying pornographic nudity vs artistic nudity
>nudity that’s artistic, body positive and feminist
Nobody want to see a fat, ugly, gender studies major b***h with purple hair naked. Not even black men who regurally frick them, because i'm pretty sure they only settle for them because normal white women don't put out for them
>objectification is a thing
Only if you're talking about that fetish where women are magically transformed into objects such as onaholes.
>letting kids go to gay events
That's 100% on the parents.
objectification is GOOD because evolution made us that way.
eggs are valuable and sperm is cheap, after all.
They hate women period. Anything traditionally feminine - anything UNtraditionally feminine - it's always the same thing. If it's about a woman, she has to be vetted and sculpted to suit a big, fat movement or culture or some shit. Because a woman can never matter to them unless she's helping them promote their latest penis extension.
>maintain a squeaky clean image and avoid even a slim chance of controversy
Oh yes, because homosexuals, trannies and anti-white shit in cartoons for babies never ever EVER would cause a controversy!
Bro you are fricking moron!
Bigots like you wouldn’t understand the difference.
Reddit moment
>Nobody is telling women to cover up.
Yes, you are. And unlike muslims you don't have the moral high ground, you're just being homosexuals.
You need to understand.
Women are more puritanical and at the same time less puritanical than men are. If you travel to a Muslim country, you’ll quickly notice that women are the most insane bigots when it comes to judging how women dress. Not the men. Islam allowed ugly women to artificially inflate their own value by forcing beautiful women onto the same playing field as ugly women due to the ninja costume dress code. Achmed can’t tell if there’s a dream or a nightmare under those robes, so ugly women get a fighting chance to share a Sheikh. The pussy cartel in the Ummah is VASTLY more powerful than outside it. Of course this applies to anywhere women exist. Christian women do it, Buddhist women do it, and Atheist women are not immune from it either. Feminists seen sex negative in this sense because they are. But rather than blaming pretty women directly like Conservative/Religious women do, they shift blame and shame onto men. “Pig! Creep! How dare you find this smoking hot chick attractive?! Shame on you! Beauty is a social construct! True beauty is inside!”. They present censorship and degradation of beauty as a feminist act protecting women against lecherous swine men.
When women talk about men, they’re talking about a very narrow or a very massive category. Women dress like bawds for the 20% of men they find attractive. That’s who the bikinis and lingerie and pushup bras and booty shorts and skirts and makeup and plastic surgery is for. They don’t give a frick if those guys stare and get horny.
For the average man however, as much as his attention is craved (albeit not as much as a 20% man) he is also despised for overstepping. This is the “male gaze” lesbians and leftist women are angry about. Nothing horrifies and upsets a woman more than when a man she views as beneath her feeling aroused or getting bold. His proper role is that of an asexual pet.
I've heard lots of stuff saying zoomers are really sex averse for some reason. Maybe this is part of it. Seeing a woman in a bra or a guy in a speedo scares them I guess.
How about stop ogling women and keep your fricking hands to yourself? You are literally selling sex figures to kids with these characters showing this much skin.
"The demon", lmao, what you think you're master cheif or some shit? Better that kids are sold normal and healthy visions of attractive women instead of being given nightmares every night by grobnetasha the diverse, devourer of cheese.
>Better that kids are sold normal and healthy visions of attractive women
Kids aren't paying attention to that shit. Sweaty neckbeards who watch children's cartoons do.
So if they're not paying attention to it, then how can it be a problem for them, "demon"?
Why do you need it in the first place? What benefit does this have for children?
Please do not engage with Scrapper, he is a lost cause and will only use your attention to validate his miserable life.
I think I've met him before. You are right. Nice to know he has a name now. You seen him anywhere else?
One problem. I bet that tink redesign crashes any ability to sell merch of her.
>Sounds like a combination of budget and wanting to promote newer characters
That means they have to pay someone to make a new suit and hire and train another actress to play the new character.
They are able to promote new characters but at a much higher cost than promoting well known and popular characters to adults.
I guess its inevitable
She's unrealistic because humans can't be that tiny unless they are in the womb but nobody wants to frick a strawberry jelly looking fetus
Here
>she's le promblematic for modern audiences!!
no one fricking cares, no one's actually asking for this
>real live human performer
>unrealistic body image
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
>unrealistic body image
She’s not obese?
>Unrealistic body image
For Americans
>Dependency on Peter Pan for approval
This is the realistic part tho.
Guys, please don't tell me you are actually falling for the excuse. None of that shit in the OP matters one but tot he people who made this decision. Its just the spin they put on it.
Disney wants to make a new design for a character they own so they can re-sell everything tinkerbell related all over again. Thats it. Its a merchandising and publicity stunt, this is just the paper thin excuse for why they 'have' to do it.
If Disney was still making as much money as they used to, this wouldn't be happening. Its an attempt at cash and attention.
Gooners die God laughs
>Left wing company censors yet another woman
>Leftists blame le conservatives for it
Serious mental illness.
Better for her to be dead than blackwashed
Pretty obvious they’re going to make her overweight and non-white then
Why have cartoons and comics when you can get entertained for hours by pretending something that doesn't exist does? How could people ever be bored with the power of imagination.
>"...an unrealistic body image..."
Why because she doesn't weigh as much as a manatee?
Tell me this isn't the earliest character that's gotten Stellar Bladed. Not only are Tinkerbell's relative proportions realistic and achievable (unless you're naturally large-chested), SHE HAD A LIVE MODEL, just like with Eve from Stellar Blade, so you can't say there aren't women out there who look like that.
Margaret Kerry, Tink's live model, told a story about how, when she and her husband (at the time) first watched Peter Pan, he leaned over and said to her, "I'd recognize those thighs anywhere." (I may be getting that quote slightly off, as that is from memory.)
Fact is, Tinkerbell is a thick-bottomed pettanko, and I'm pretty sure there are plenty of women out there with that shape: I dated at least one of them, and they aren't exactly rare.
Whatever the reason for removing her is I sincerely doubt it's because Disney thinks she's problematic now. She was featured in a recent Lorcana gift set, plus there are a bunch of other cards featuring her original design.
Wasn't she prominent in the Disney 100 short as well?
she had a Meet and Greet at the Town Hall area of Main Street, I just think Disney didn't think Tinkerbell fit in Main Street
These Lorcana sets are probably going through development for months, this Tinkerbell decision is brand new.
or… hear me out… you’re stupid for believing Facebook post
Because Disney would NEVER do [thing that aligns with all the other shit they've been doing] right?
It's like making fun of a guy for believing that a bird shit on someone's windshield. It's a thing birds do.
Can’t tell if ragebait or not. Need to find a stronger source on the media matters thing. Only stuff that supports this is that she has been removed as a meet and greet and it seems like they are phasing out her classic green dress design in SOME material plus she turned into a black in the shit live action whatever that was. She still appears on floats in her normal green dress though
Fake or not. I do not understand how "body positivity" morons should get angry when Tink is all about accepting bodies that are a little rounder.
Is it cause the modern man grew to accept pear figures that they suddenly want to 180?
>dependency of approval and/or attention from Peter Pan
So they admit they just completely forgot about all of this?
>pirate fairy movie
>only time Christina Hendricks doesn't have huge breasts on display
Would have killed to see a fairy Hendricks flying with those gozongas.
man that "safe" corporate talk gives me litteral headaches. i know english is not my native language but why can't they talk like normal functioning human beings when they make these stupid press releases
The source is wdwpro, known grifter and the person one half of Clownfishtv is having an affair with, but not the one you'd expect.
no one here is actually gonna listen to you (unfortunately), they've already twisted this fib as "fact' in their demented heads and now just want to vent about moronic schizo conspiracies'
Subversive warfare. They are ruining or cancelling everything people like. All to anger and demoralize you.
Demoralized to a point of not subbing? I dont think you all understand what the term demoralizing means.
at this point why even bother anymore?
frick everything, whatever.
Get rid of Balu too, unrealistic body standards.
She’s… just Marilyn Monroe?
>She’s… just Marilyn Monroe?
She's just Margaret Kerry.
I get the feeling that no one actually complained and some HR Karen made up this mass backlash to this character that hasn't been relevant in decades so she could pat herself on the back for opposing "unrealistic body image" and other made up problems.
>unrealistic body images.
>unrealistic.
>on flesh and blood person playing the character.
nah, they are just gonna racebend her, Disney already managed to eliminate all redheads and now they are coming for the blondes.
So what you can't depict girls being jealous? You can depict girls being bad?
Jesus Christ.
None of the articles I'm finding about this have a real source so I can only assume they're ragebaiting.
How often does Tinkerbell's fat butt fart?
HA HA GET FRICKED FAIRIES! GO BACK TO YOUR CIRCLES AND STAY GO!
calm down crocker
Holy frick.
Good job, Disney. Very progressive. One of your current employees fed women to a rapist, but other than that, good job.
That square headed c**t has blackmail on every big executive in Hollywood. She's basically made for life.
Question for chicks lurking
Why do most of you feel so threatened and bothered by good looking girls? When I see a hot guy in a movie or show, nothing about it bothers me. I’d prefer to look at him over an ugly guy. I know I’m not attractive. What he looks like doesn’t hurt my feelings or make me jealous.
Why do you always try to tear down attractive women and guys attracted to them?
That question is completely pointless to ask here. The femanons who post here are likely not the kind of women calling for this. In general most women are great about hyping up prettier, sexier women- and in the converse, the most vicious about destroying women they find ugly or weird. The kind of people doing this are management types who are just bitter to the core.
Does it bother you when a hot guy gets the girl instead of the ugly guy?
No. When big homie gets laid it feels like the whole squad got laid. I’m supposed to hate bro for piping a bop?
Based. I was expecting an incel response.
Yea instead you got a twitter response fr no cap
It is extremely funny that Twitter commies unironically come to Cinemaphile and try to engage with anons.
Disney can't die fast enough.
>believing this moronic bait
you’re better than that Boco (not much, but still a little)
>The girl we hired to play her in the parks refused to continue sucking off the Park Executives so they fired her and we can't find anyone hot, talented enough to play the character well, and willing to keep the blowjob train coming
This sort of thing annoys me, but more for how much ammo it gives to the sort of people who think it's the death of western civilization. I think some anons earlier in this thread totally called it, this is just something they were already going to do anyway for budget and promotional reasons and they just wanted some noble-sounding excuse for it. It's not because purple-haired hordes hung tinkerbell in fricking effigy, Tink's basically an icon for the big-butt crowd, you see her on ghetto clothes almost as much as looney tunes characters. Again, the Peter Pan movie is already in lockup for that racist-ass indian song. But I'll guarantee you they won't go to the trouble of removing her from the ride. It's not as simple as removing that song from the soundtrack.
tldr it's just frickin' bait man who gives a shit. the more crying from the right they get the more free press they get
It's kinda weird that black tinkerbell was funded and completely fine to produce but white tinkerbell coincidentally wasn't. Listen man, most people are aware of DEI, ESG, SBI, or whatever form this shit takes now, even average people are aware of this, and nobody wants it in anything ever. It just corrodes the integrity of everything.
no, you’re just a moron
>no rebuttal
I accept your concession.
Imagine showing up to work one day and they fire you because your body isn't realistic enough.
Where was the plug originally inserted and why?
I thought she was cute.
FRICK. That ugly Brittish git's genes really did a number on Mila's kid. Also sure, that black woman is hot, but why the frick is she playing Tinker Bell, a character who isn't black? And she certainly isn't hot enough for anyone to watch that awful movie.
My patience and tolerance for minorities is running extremely thin.
Anyone who isn't a straight white cis man better watching your fricking backs, because the Day of the Rope is coming.
I am so goddamn sick of this woke/PC culture bullshit. It's all become so ingrained into society now that it's more or less become law. Where in the frick did society go so wrong to allow these mentally-insane snowflakes to govern everything??
Lot of confusion about puritans on all sides. They were a politically left-wing group compared to the society they lived in, but they were simultaneously more sexually and religiously conservative than the society they lived in. Also, their ideological descendants currently rule the world through elite American universities that gatekeep elite status in America. Almost all Ivy League schools have very strong and sometimes explicitly Puritan roots
I remember how Disney made a huge deal about that direct-to-video series of Tinkerbell.
What the hell happened to cause this shit?
"We're retiring the actress to free up a spot for someone else but we want to spin it as some noble bullshit"
>Wickeb
cause you’re stupid, stop browsing /misc/
Did Disney completely forget that the Tinkerbell in the parks is their 2000s/2010s version of her where she's a headstrong girlboss who don't need no man?
That's why it's obvious marketing spin bullshit. Anyone who thinks disney actually cares about any of this shit is a fool giving them free publicity. The more people feed into the narrative by complaining about disney getting "woke", the more they get to act like heroes. This is some cheap restructuring shit that they're passing off as body positivity.
Dreamworks beat them to that punch by 20 years with Shrek.
That's a lot of shit, 7 fricking movies? Why the hell did they cancel the series? Not profitable enough?
Toys stopped selling.
You expect the people that run Disney to actually know their own characters?
I was in a local comic shop and a couple of older women were talking about this bullshit. One was the owner. She said she was sick of this woke Disney bullshit and they said how it was just probably a handful out loudmouthed people trying to get their way. She also said they really enjoy ordering Zenscope pinup stuff which goes way further than anything in Disney parks.
>older women
>comic book shop
calling bullshit
Tinkerbell is so fricking sexy bros
No good can come of this.
>Coming next: no good comes of this
I don't care what they think they're doing, this won't stick. Tinkerbell is a cute buxom blonde, deal with it.
tinkerbell being CANCELLED OH MY GOD PLEASE NO NOT THIS ANYTHING BUT THIS!??? Who gives a frick about this non character. A meaningless emblem slapped on t shirts and coffee mugs with the same amount of worth as the logo on the packaging of a store brand.
it's because of her distinctly Nordic / Aryan facial structure.
There's nothing israelites hate more than signs of pure whiteness.
i dont care if this is real or fake
i'm tired of hearing about shit like this in general
>skinny
>white
>blonde
Yeah, that would definitely offend the morbidly obese mutts. I'm glad disney made this move to combat racism and fatphobia. If you think being skinny and white is okay, then that is a mighty YIKES from me.
Heterosexual attractive white girl=LE BAD
Someone make the next thread
no, everyone is a fricking moron
143642759
chirst you're a moron