After 57 quintillion eons you will still be combing the outer reaches of space and time searching for brains to stop the never-ending agony of eternal rot. I don't know if I would consider that "overpowered". Sounds more like "Fricked forever".
The movie should have shown a "caste" system of zombies that reflects the amount of cranial ability post expiration or how much of their brain they can actually utilize. Older, more decrepit ones with massive cranial trauma or rot are little more than animals operating on pure instinct while fresh ones have near total usage of their brains and thinking capacity.
Then again, realism went out the fricking window when severed body parts are able to have not only locomotion, but coordination in their locomotion as if they were connected to the brain. An interesting scenario could happen if the chemical agent was actually mutagenic and forced the generation of stem cells to neurons to every part of the body. Effectively making each part of the body "think" on its own and is able to spread the mutagenic effects via each part. Each limb is now effectively like a starfish/octopus in that if can act on its own. It could also somewhat explain why cranial damage does not slow the being as it constantly using stored energy to generate new neurons in place of older, more damaged ones.
>This isn't a video game moron
this times a thousand.
I hate all these morons who have to view everything through the lens of videogames.
these are the same tards that talk about how Gandalf only uses low level spells or try to assign D&D stats to the Ring of Power.
>version of the first movie
What is with this stupid complaint popping up all over now? It's a standard zombies rise from the grave due to chemicals story but other than that they're nothing alike. You want it to be a completely different movie and unlike the previous movie in any way? Then go watch a different fricking movie.
It even has the same zombies >You want it to be a completely different movie and unlike the previous movie in any way? Then go watch a different fricking movie.
Okay, I will
>version of the first movie
What is with this stupid complaint popping up all over now? It's a standard zombies rise from the grave due to chemicals story but other than that they're nothing alike. You want it to be a completely different movie and unlike the previous movie in any way? Then go watch a different fricking movie.
Wasn't the first so popular in Asia that they literally just tried to make the same movie again to capitalize on it? It's got the same two guys who turn into zombies again.
Never heard about it, but it's true that in east Asia it was quite successufull, in part thanks to Linnea Quigley being naked the whole time. In Japan they found the scene of the half lady erotic because of their bondage fetish.
The actors themselves said in the official DVD commentary that they hated the script.
I don't know why they choose to make the movie a comedy >But the first one was a comedy too!
No, it wasn't. It had some black humor elements, but the first sequel wanted to be a complete comedy and just failed.
The third one made by Yuzna redeemed the franchise, it can be considere the real sequel.
Necropolis and Rave from the Grave are just jokes and never happened, most probably they were made to keep the copyrights.
They need to eat live brains, no matter if humans' or animals'. In the sequence where Freddy attacks Tina in the chapel you can see Frank escaping from the room to go to the crematorium; but why he doesn't attack Tina too? In a deleted part of the scene, he catches a rat and eats its brain to ease his pain, in this way he maintains enough coscience to not attack the other people, and then kill himself.
>even the butterfly specimens start flapping their wings >the rows of skeletons hanging everywhere don't move even though there's a clearly animated skeleton in the graveyard later
Maybe he was ignorant. I mean you tell me anon, the skellies didn't move. So either he's a liar/ignorant or it's budget. Either way we do see a skellington in the graveyard so we have proof it does work on just bones.
Though then again if you have a high quality rip you can see the wood piece they used to move the skelly around so maybe canonically that skelington in the gravyyard was being puppeteered by one of the zombies for the lulz.
Lots of possibilities.
the skeletons had no ligaments, the one resurrected in the cemetery maybe had still some residue of tendons; overall THAT scene was blatantly a comedic one, but scary anyway.
The movie should have shown a "caste" system of zombies that reflects the amount of cranial ability post expiration or how much of their brain they can actually utilize. Older, more decrepit ones with massive cranial trauma or rot are little more than animals operating on pure instinct while fresh ones have near total usage of their brains and thinking capacity.
Then again, realism went out the fricking window when severed body parts are able to have not only locomotion, but coordination in their locomotion as if they were connected to the brain. An interesting scenario could happen if the chemical agent was actually mutagenic and forced the generation of stem cells to neurons to every part of the body. Effectively making each part of the body "think" on its own and is able to spread the mutagenic effects via each part. Each limb is now effectively like a starfish/octopus in that if can act on its own. It could also somewhat explain why cranial damage does not slow the being as it constantly using stored energy to generate new neurons in place of older, more damaged ones.
True. But it was a low budget movie, so they had to semplify, they just wanted the creatures to look disgusting.
>Was it cringe or a fun bonus feature?
Last time I watched this, I turned on the zombie subtitles. I thought there'd be a chance that they'd be cool like the talk they had with the torso lady, but yeah... I guess I'm glad I powered through the whole thing, but I'd never recommend it or watch it like that again. It was cringe.
The zombies in this movie were bullshittingly overpowered.
They're supernatural beings, so... there is that.
I feel bad for this gud boi. I bet he eats brains tho, but I don't know if he will be able to digest it. Let us say that he bites brains.
>They're supernatural beings
The movie states they're biological zombies caused by top secret army chemicals, not magic zombies.
But they are overpowered, so a good moviegoer would presume that they are also supernatural.
After 57 quintillion eons you will still be combing the outer reaches of space and time searching for brains to stop the never-ending agony of eternal rot. I don't know if I would consider that "overpowered". Sounds more like "Fricked forever".
The movie should have shown a "caste" system of zombies that reflects the amount of cranial ability post expiration or how much of their brain they can actually utilize. Older, more decrepit ones with massive cranial trauma or rot are little more than animals operating on pure instinct while fresh ones have near total usage of their brains and thinking capacity.
Then again, realism went out the fricking window when severed body parts are able to have not only locomotion, but coordination in their locomotion as if they were connected to the brain. An interesting scenario could happen if the chemical agent was actually mutagenic and forced the generation of stem cells to neurons to every part of the body. Effectively making each part of the body "think" on its own and is able to spread the mutagenic effects via each part. Each limb is now effectively like a starfish/octopus in that if can act on its own. It could also somewhat explain why cranial damage does not slow the being as it constantly using stored energy to generate new neurons in place of older, more damaged ones.
Anon, it was a cash grab for the zombie craze and an excuse to show some breasts and minge. You're overthinking it.
But you're also correct.
>overpowered
This isn't a video game moron
>This isn't a video game moron
this times a thousand.
I hate all these morons who have to view everything through the lens of videogames.
these are the same tards that talk about how Gandalf only uses low level spells or try to assign D&D stats to the Ring of Power.
I don't know what the frick they were thinking with 2. It's just an infinitely worse version of the first movie
>version of the first movie
What is with this stupid complaint popping up all over now? It's a standard zombies rise from the grave due to chemicals story but other than that they're nothing alike. You want it to be a completely different movie and unlike the previous movie in any way? Then go watch a different fricking movie.
It even has the same zombies
>You want it to be a completely different movie and unlike the previous movie in any way? Then go watch a different fricking movie.
Okay, I will
Wasn't the first so popular in Asia that they literally just tried to make the same movie again to capitalize on it? It's got the same two guys who turn into zombies again.
Never heard about it, but it's true that in east Asia it was quite successufull, in part thanks to Linnea Quigley being naked the whole time. In Japan they found the scene of the half lady erotic because of their bondage fetish.
>decaying brat! needs rape correction!
The actors themselves said in the official DVD commentary that they hated the script.
I don't know why they choose to make the movie a comedy
>But the first one was a comedy too!
No, it wasn't. It had some black humor elements, but the first sequel wanted to be a complete comedy and just failed.
The third one made by Yuzna redeemed the franchise, it can be considere the real sequel.
Necropolis and Rave from the Grave are just jokes and never happened, most probably they were made to keep the copyrights.
Damn, that homie ugly.
Zombie movies have really been neutered in the last two decades.
They need to eat live brains, no matter if humans' or animals'. In the sequence where Freddy attacks Tina in the chapel you can see Frank escaping from the room to go to the crematorium; but why he doesn't attack Tina too? In a deleted part of the scene, he catches a rat and eats its brain to ease his pain, in this way he maintains enough coscience to not attack the other people, and then kill himself.
yes, if they wanted the pain to go away
>even the butterfly specimens start flapping their wings
>the rows of skeletons hanging everywhere don't move even though there's a clearly animated skeleton in the graveyard later
Anon... those are fake skeletons for learning purposes. Like the ones in classrooms.
Then Frank's a lying bastard, he said they were from a skeleton farm in India
Maybe he was ignorant. I mean you tell me anon, the skellies didn't move. So either he's a liar/ignorant or it's budget. Either way we do see a skellington in the graveyard so we have proof it does work on just bones.
Though then again if you have a high quality rip you can see the wood piece they used to move the skelly around so maybe canonically that skelington in the gravyyard was being puppeteered by one of the zombies for the lulz.
Lots of possibilities.
Budget issue but maybe the skellies were actually plastic.
The skeletons clearly didn't have any brain or nervous system to reanimate, where the one in the graveyard clearly had at least eyes.
the skeletons had no ligaments, the one resurrected in the cemetery maybe had still some residue of tendons; overall THAT scene was blatantly a comedic one, but scary anyway.
True. But it was a low budget movie, so they had to semplify, they just wanted the creatures to look disgusting.
>skeletons hanging everywhere
those came from a skeleton farm in India though.
>split dogs start barking
>butterflies start flapping
>skeletons start shitting
Was it cringe or a fun bonus feature?
>Was it cringe or a fun bonus feature?
Last time I watched this, I turned on the zombie subtitles. I thought there'd be a chance that they'd be cool like the talk they had with the torso lady, but yeah... I guess I'm glad I powered through the whole thing, but I'd never recommend it or watch it like that again. It was cringe.