dodge this
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
dodge this
dodge this
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
The two DVD releases easily look the best.
The 1999 DVD release looks okay. The 2004 one looks like shit. The 4K Blu-ray is the closest to how it looked in kinoplexes though, and you homosexuals are always LARPing about how much you care about that, so it's the winner.
The 2004 DVD is easily the best looking though. I don't give a frick about what it supposedly looked like on a shitty theater screen 50 years ago, I care about which one looks best to view today.
You people are mentally deranged. That 2004 one looks like shit and is the one furthest possible from the director's original intention. I know you freaks only LARP about caring about that in the first place, but you same morons will be shitting and pissing your diapers again the next time the blue-tinted LotR screenshots are posted. That's why literally nothing posted on this board should ever be taken seriously be anybody. You don't even believe what you're saying.
Cry and seethe and piss and shit harder. The 2004 version looks superior.
kek wtf 2004 one looks the best
>4K Blu-ray is the closest to how it looked in kinoplexes
While i agree the 2004 version green don't always work good because it's a regrading or some shit, the 4K version looks as close as any other version.
the blu-ray remaster is canon
Best is the original 35mm 1999
why can they not just match the colours to the 35mm print? why is it so fricking hard for them? i refuse to believe that this colour variation between releases is intentional
Because they have done something to our sun. It no longer has that bright yellow/orange glow to it, it now casts a cold white light so they're retroactively changing films to that disgusting filter to make you think that's how the outside always looked like. Go out on a summer day and you will notice it looks more like the bottom right than the top left at this point and it's only going to get worse.
Also notice how rainbows are an increasingly rare sight. It used to be that you could always see a rainbow after a rainy day provided it was sunny, now you're lucky if you see one maybe twice in a summer.
ok schizo
Genuinely take your meds schizo. Your eyesight and memory are different as a child so naturally your perception to these things change as you age.
bottom right mogs everything by a landslide
the top right is true. The sky was actually blue in theatre, I remember because I recognised Sydney and said to myself "don't be silly just because the sky is blue doesn't mean it's Sydney" but it was
They added the green filter to match the grading of Reloaded and Revolutions... they will never go back to the original colors.
Are scans actually faithful? Remember when Nolan autistically had them restore 2001: A Space Odyssey to the exact print matrices Kubrick approved in 1968 even though the color temperature of projector bulbs/lights is far less incandescent, meaning Nolan's supposedly technically perfect restoration looked a shade of green that no one, and certainly not Kubrick, saw in 1968?
>Are scans actually faithful?
Depends on the scan. Not all scanning equipment behaves the same way.
In any civilized society Blue Ray apologist would be hanged on street lamp
GREENED
now post the remaster
I prefer green matrix. It's ironically iconic at this point.
What if he actually dodged it because she wasted time on an one-liner? Wouldn't that be embarrassing?
>Do--
>gets her fricking neck broken
If you can dodge moving bullets, you can dodge someone's two second one-liner
The dumbest is that it wasn't even necessary, it would have been actually cooler if she delivered the one-liner AFTER shooting him.
Would make no sense to say "Dodge this" after shooting him, they would have to rewrite the script into something like "Dodge that".