Does anyone else think this is Spielberg's best film, except for perhaps Jaws?

Does anyone else think this is Spielberg's best film, except for perhaps Jaws? (Maybe you could make a film/flick distinction.)

Something about this film is so primal. The feelings of abandonment and desire for love is so raw and real in this film in a way I don't think I have seen in any other movie. It's sad and horrific at the same time. There is a lot to chew on in this film as well. I still think about it semi-regularly having watched it years ago. Thoughts?

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    For me it's up there with Jaws and Duel. Probably his last truly good film.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Probably his last truly good film.
      Definitely agree there.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Probably his last truly good film.
      Definitely agree there.

      War of the Worlds and Minority Report are both good

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Minority Report was always good and better than the source material.
        A.I. is very strange, I don't like the flow of the movie.

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    too long

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe if they didn’t botch the ending.

    He should have just stayed in the dark waiting for the fairy to come to him and pan out to black. Even that would be a more merciful ending than we got.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      The ending really ties the whole film together thematically. Through parallels, the ending is there to really show that the robots are truly human in every sense of the word and, depending on how you interpret the religious themes of the film, possess souls.

      Also, the cruelty of being revived 2000 years later just to get your wish for one day hits harder imo.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >we can only bring your mom back for one day
        >why?
        >uh... because that's just how it works
        shit ending

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I didn't listen to the reasoning so I'm just going to cross my arms and call it bad

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Also, the cruelty of being revived 2000 years later just to get your wish for one day hits harder imo.

        >we can only bring your mom back for one day
        >why?
        >uh... because that's just how it works
        shit ending

        >shit ending

        >I didn't listen to the reasoning so I'm just going to cross my arms and call it bad

        I kinda agree with the other anon about the dumb ending. The cruel irony of the ending only exists because of contrivances. It's a contrived ending. The writing is bending over backwards to make it appear clever but it's not. That's the problem. Whole lotta fluff that doesn't deliver anything all that poignant. Spielberg is a master of dumb entertainment.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >pan out to black

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      The ending is the best part. It had more vision than an entire decade of scifi.

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    One note stretched way too long and the ending was stupid.

  5. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    It was great, but excessive

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hook

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Come on it is not even close, after he leaves the family the movie is a complete mess. because Spielberg is a terrible screenwriter. the scenes with the family were a good short film.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hello moron.
      Spielberg didn't write this film. Kubrick did.

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    This movie filters a lot of people. The ending is supposed to be the way it is per Kubrick's intents.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yep. The ending is basically exactly what Kubrick intended. The only major addition Spielberg brought was the flesh fair sequence.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you can have a failed quest, but can't have an achieved quest with no rewards
        somebody tell todd howard

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          the modders will fix it

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        So the worst part of the movie?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          I agree. But the ending usually gets attributed to Spielberg as well.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >you cannot have an achieved quest with no reward
        But thats why it was such a kino ending. It's called a bittersweet ending and it jerks your tears like a motherfricker. I love it.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          can’t expect a woman to understand

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's really a Kubrick project though.

        Development of A.I. originally began after producer/director Stanley Kubrick acquired the rights to Aldiss' story in the early 1970s. Kubrick hired a series of writers, including Brian Aldiss, Bob Shaw, Ian Watson, and Sara Maitland, until the mid-1990s. The film languished in development hell for years, partly because Kubrick felt that computer-generated imagery was not advanced enough to create the David character, whom he believed no child actor would convincingly portray. In 1995, Kubrick handed A.I. to Spielberg, but the film did not gain momentum until Kubrick died in 1999. Spielberg remained close to Watson's treatment for the screenplay, and dedicated the film to Kubrick.

        Yeah, the best parts of the film is the first and third act, which are Kubrick's.

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    One of the kinoest posters.

  10. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    David stealing the helicopter was kino

  11. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's really a Kubrick project though.

    Development of A.I. originally began after producer/director Stanley Kubrick acquired the rights to Aldiss' story in the early 1970s. Kubrick hired a series of writers, including Brian Aldiss, Bob Shaw, Ian Watson, and Sara Maitland, until the mid-1990s. The film languished in development hell for years, partly because Kubrick felt that computer-generated imagery was not advanced enough to create the David character, whom he believed no child actor would convincingly portray. In 1995, Kubrick handed A.I. to Spielberg, but the film did not gain momentum until Kubrick died in 1999. Spielberg remained close to Watson's treatment for the screenplay, and dedicated the film to Kubrick.

  12. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Hey Steven, baby, dude, I think this band has to walk on this movie,” Jourgensen claims to have said. “We can’t do this part for you, because Kubrick told me that it was a porno film and ‘A.I.’ stood for ‘Anal Intruder’. We were here for a porno film.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Boooooo

  13. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like the warm and fuzzy dreamlike cinematography of this movie. It gives me a warm feeling.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      I should rewatch it.

  14. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    pure kino

  15. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah the ending to the film made me literally tear up and I never cry due to my autism. Shit hit me like a ton of bricks and I did not expect it at all. Probably one of the most emotional scenes I've ever seen.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      autist has mommy issues woah

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      The ending is the best part. It had more vision than an entire decade of scifi.

      Agreed with both points

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's something about watching this childlike thing want something so bad and go through all of this hell, then at the very end he gets it, but only for a day. But that day was all he needed and he "shuts down" after he gets it.
      It's sweet. Sad, but sweet. It fricks with your head which is what Kubrick intended. He made a bet with himself that he could make people cry over an inanimate object and he fricking does it.

  16. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nah his best film is close encounters of the third kind

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      too much boomer vibes
      feels like boomer fantasy now

  17. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's only good because kubrick had his hands in it.
    by 2000 spielberg was already a has been hack

  18. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's overrated but I appreciated the ayy lmaos at the end fricking with the kid robot just because they could.

  19. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Terrific flick

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *