drew like a dark, fricked up version of yosemite sam from looney tunes haha. just a glimpse into my dark reality. a full stare into my twisted persepctive would make most simply go insane
drew like a dark, fricked up version of yosemite sam from looney tunes haha. just a glimpse into my dark reality.
Before: out of character
After: in character
It really is funny how the "before" picture is pretty much this. Just a fundamentally shallow, surface level reading of the character they're trying to "corrupt". Imagine this applied to every single Warner IP they wanted to use, this show would be insufferable.
>It really is funny how
>It's so funny how
You people are sounding like a broken record at this point, not even a pibbygay myself and I can tell this thing isn't healthy for you
Blame the pibbygays for being so thick skulled one has to repeat them a dozen times before they get message
Bitch, you're on Cinemaphile, shut the frick up about what's "healthy" or not, you waive all rights to that when you post on a thread.
>Verification not required
>You people are sounding like a broken record at this point
A broken clock is till right twice in a day...
This is the main problem. Yosemite Sam wasn't harmless because he was friendly and happy, but because Bugs Bunny was a godlike reality warper and characters survived any level of violence so they could keep making jokes because the point was to be funny not have "drama and stakes." Sometimes they died and came back though if only in a later short.
To make Yosemite Sam dangerous, you don't have to change Yosemite Sam, who is a homicidal gun wielding psychopath who runs around shooting people for no reason. You can keep him exactly the same and just change the rules of the world. And then Marvin the Martian kills everyone on Earth and destroys the planet a few minutes later. I mean frick, have Bugs Bunny take out a saw, but now when he cuts up countries or states everyone is screaming as they're sucked out to sea to drown or suffer some stranger fate as the surface of the planet rearranges itself at top speeds. They mostly weren't happy and friendly characters.
Essentially, do what The Mask did in the comics where he acted like a Looney Tune, but his actions were lethal to everyone around him.
Yeah I think The Mask is a great example of this, like Toon Form Judge Doom is a good example. Once "normal" "Toon Rules" don't apply for whatever reason, either to certain characters or to all or most of the world besides the violent Toon, they just naturally become horrifying nightmare beings with a massive body count by doing what they always do.
no I'm pretty sure he wasn't harmless because Bugs was smarter then him and tricked the guy constantly
This. Sam is actually brutal, but Bugs outsmarts him so much that he seems harmless. That’s the entire joke. He kills people, marries widows and plans to kill them for their money, robs banks, and is a tyrant in a few timelines. He’s already intense.
>fricked up version of yosemite sam
Which one is it? Or is it both?
yosemite sam is already fricked up
Damn bro, you should be, like, a tattoo artist or something!
autism
>Having reactions to artwork is autism
Ok
STRONG reactions to artwork is autism
my cat wakes me up with his noisy scratching every morning at like 2 am and it pisses me off I wanna just kick it to the moon sometimes
>not recognizing sarcasm
I don't know, that sounds pretty autistic to me.
This shit went too far OP. I will pray for your soul.
just gonna put this here
Why did they make him so hunky in this fricking show?
He may be a loser and a manlet, but he’s still physically active.
He should frick Bugs as an act of dominance
>You don't get it Scully director Skinner has been hit with a ray that makes your hair grow
What a graceful jump. Top notch animation. Serious
The positives of having a more calm setting with the possibility of giving details like that
Wtf, when did Sam become hunky?
I would just like to say that regardless if this show ever got greenlit or not I wouldn't watch it.
So it's WB owned properties but they're glitch zombies.
Ok.
Cool.
I want to argue that neither version looks like Yosemite Sam. But the corrupted version looks more like him that the non corrupted.
The non-corrupted version might as well be the Bunny Snatchers version.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_the_Bunny_Snatchers
Yes Imvasion of the Bunny Snatchers was like Pibby but made by people who actually watched Looney Tunes and that was in what in 1992?
I think mostly it feels really worn out and unoriginal though you could still make something good out of overused cliches because people do it all the time.
I think what would make it annoying would be if it's just "my Mary Sue OC girlboss kicks all of your favorite characters in the nutz" like shut the frick up. Every goddamn reboot or new installment seems to have one. That is fine in fanfiction where it belongs though.
I always liked he packed enough firepower to launch himself into the air. He never needs a reload either.
Then the monster design would be flying into orbit with how much firepower it has or flying around shooting the ground like if it was using a jetpack
I want to say that some of the other monster designs posted looked okay with a big beard or something.
If that picture getting spammed even is concept art, it's too bad though also not fair at all to nitpick one doodle into the ground. The first picture looks way too happy and nice to be Yosemite Sam while the second one just has I guess different kinds of guns than Sam uses but otherwise looks like him? I think a cool Yosemite Sam monster might have hands or even fingers that turn into rifles, maybe his beard would, too (maybe the other model has that?) and maybe because Yosemite Sam loses his temper a lot, his face would be red and flames would be shooting out of his head. He could look zany and scary.
>and maybe because Yosemite Sam loses his temper a lot, his face would be red and flames would be shooting out of his head.
Are you twelve years old or something?
It's a Pibby thread, what else would you expect.
I mean, surely, he can come up with something better than that.
Right?
I find amusing the image of a chainsaw man ripoff design flying through the stratosphere ala Jetpack Joyride
That kind of thing should happen often in pibby to not make everything too broody
NO DICK
NO BALLS
That's enough thirstposting for Yosemite Sam!
I want to punch whoever drew this 11 years ago
*shake the hand of
And stay down
>It's funnier and more appropriate for the character
Gee, is like that if turning down the edge a bit makes the final result better!
Pibby's charm is it's autistic edginess.
>Quads of truth
Nice dog
I hope he isn't taking Bunbun's place or that pibby is white woman coded
>white woman coded
A few women frick their dogs and now it's a stereotype?
Why is this thread crawling with namegays?
Pibby magic
>a thread about a moronic cartoon attracts morons
Imagine my surprise
right but most of the morons are ranting about how much they hate it.
>2 people
>crawling
At least i'm not moronic enough to gatekeep someone based on a fricking name.
Eh, it's funny to me
Her voice actor is a Californian mutt so that doggie is safe from violation
Huh, I haven't look up Pibby's voice actor before so I thought she looked a bit more white
>Pibby is Californian
Now everything makes sense
children
And Manchildren
Frick you. I like it.
You are part of the problem
>You are part of the problem
What problem? Not catering to your opinion?
>The Yosemite is dead!?
>We know!
>Who killed him?
>We don't know!
>I will find clues
>2023
i am forgotten
Did that movie do anything interesting with the concept? I didn't bother to see it because I assumed no.
No is your average run of the mill slasher movie but a Winnie Pooh skin
I couldn't even sit through more than a few minutes because it wasn't even so bad it's good, it was horrendous. It wasn't funny. Even the worst hobbyist "horror" take of a teenager playing with a camera had more chills.
I'm actually having a really hard time remembering the last time a "childhood thing but edgy" was good? They're hardly ever funny and they've been done to death to the point it's the least original thing you can pull. Wait, maybe the Venture Brothers parody of Scooby-Doo? Making them parodies of real serial killers and criminals was actually funny, by contrast, Velma was utter shit. Meanwhile I actually don't think the other Venture Brothers parodies are anything to write home about on their own but they make the characters stand on their own or the show would have become insufferable after a few episodes, "what if old cartoon but edgy" usually lasts the 1-3 minutes it takes to do a Robot Chicken sketch and that it it. And that's if it's good.
Actually that's the main problem with this idea, isn't it? Seeing a fake trailer or April Fool's jokes with Fred Flinstone and Yogi Bear as zombies really is funny. But after that, that's it, the joke is all used up after five minutes, and even if there was a "creepiness" factor (I don't think so) that would be too. You can't do a full series with multiple seasons around this. The best case would be it's strong enough to stand on its own and these are cameo Easter Eggs in the background.
Rightfully too
>Verification not required
Peering into a face like mine
Light of lime
Grim constructs of the mind
I feel you should unwind
And take a breather
Sit right there and I'll see you
On a journey where I won't defeat you but defend
From what'll eat you
Any demons trying to meet you
Understand how I've got you
More than that I really would've thought you'd know that
This land is divided
They need something they can confide in
I know you'll see
That someone is me
You don't have to try all the lies just to
Tell me that you bring demise so
Tell me
Who you think you see
When you are seeing me
You see so undeniably it's clearly
Naught but false to think that I'm fake
Don't think it's too late to
Take a break from what trusting what your head is telling you like
"FAKE̡ ͘F̀A̶K͘E FAK̛E͠" it's all a lie
By which I don't mean me
But the things you hear you say
Won't come true
...Fact the fake here might be (You)
Though
I've not got a secret hiding any more than you know
Hold on to your life so dear the demons hide away
As the light your soul doth shine lead astray...
Go back to /exeg/ you fake ass homie
Nah man EXE is /funkg/'s property now
Hey son
catch this
You forgot to pull the pin first lord X
Stupid
Take your gay discord shit to where it belongs
They made this song years ago and it was much better.
?si=TXU5WymwR6P_WpDN
You dumbass.
You moronic dumbass.
>He says, while posting Black person EXE
What is this song?
fnf shit
>'corruption' is just the sanitized modern cartoon characters reverting back to their original, outwardly violent personalities
>pepsi or whatever her name is is just dealing with classic cartoon characters with no modern sensibilities holding them back
that would've been a way better plot for this instead of 'le epic glitch monsters get decapitated by OC gremlin'. throw that c**t against bugs bunny in full blackface leading the us army circa WWII over a mountain of dead japs and see how fricking cool she is then
It's just Kingdom Hearts. The premise is exactly the same (mass crossover, corruption, etc).
>It's just Kingdom Hearts
But with Blood!
At least the Heartless and Nobodies were neat. Also, Kingdom Hearts knew it was JRPG slop at the end of the day; they didn't try to make Sora dark or edgy or whatever, you know?
He was even kinda goofy in his actual dark form.
Honestly yes just people remembering that 1930s etc. cartoons had ultraviolence, booze, suicide, etc. in them without (and this is the most important part!) them even making a big deal out of it! would be great. Back then a cartoon character might shoot someone or themselves in the head as easily as breathing and no one in or out of universe even batted a fricking eye.
Remember Eddie Valiant vs. Judge Doom in Roger Rabbit? Judge Doom was really a more opportunistic, but not that unusual, Toon vs. a normal guy. A sanitized modern kids character vs. the original versions of these characters would be a fight. The old cartoons are very edgy by modern standards.
All of these things seem to be made by people who have never seen those old cartoons, just sanitized kids' T-shirts merch versions of the characters.
Oh boy im sure ready for another autism thread
>Pibby guy posts his tryhard design for corrupted Sam
>It's yet another fricking anime reference (outright said he based it on Chainsaw Man's Gun Devil)
These people can't make shows without inserting references to better works into every nook and cranny, huh?
Is like we are battering a fetus that hasn't born yet
Good, batter it more, maybe it can miscarriage.
But we don't know what it could actually look like in it's complete potential
Isn't that a bit too harsh?
Just read tails gets trolled
nah read scoob and shag it's literally just what pibby wants to be
>Potential
What? This is the kind of thing that doesn't have high potential if it has bad handling and surprise pibby has a horrendous one
How many time do you need to be told that your shit sucks ass
And that fetus is the antichrist
No, Velma and CW Powerpuff Girls were the Antichrist. Pibby is just crossover autism which is far from the worst thing ever.
>No, Velma and CW Powerpuff Girls were the Antichrist
It's so funny how the only people who ever talk about these anymore are the same people who beat High Guardian Spice to the ground with their hyperbole.
Also, nah, Pibby already leaks all over to other fanbases whether people want it or not and much more against their will than a bad, isolated spinoff would. Officially sanctioned crossover autism would be Hell for discussion anywhere. It's already Hell as is.
People hate Pibby because it reminds them of their cringy edgy teenager phase.
That's why I like it, unfortunately.
I shut up the part of me that says edgy stuff is cringe because I have fun with edginess and no one will make think otherwise
Hey my cringy edgy phase would have involved characters getting entirely redesigned to some tim burton knock off style. Not just normal character but OH NO LE REALISTIC GUN AND BLEEDING STATIC EYES!
I hate Pibby because it's a corporate bastardization of edgy teenage phases.
Those phases deserve to be bastardized.
I don't hate pibby. I just don't care for it.
someone on twit-for-twat had a pretty good idea goin’ on here, like what good is corruption of WB IP if there aren’t any survivors (i think this is most obvious with that “beta kid” character that’s basically bootleg robin)
(also of all the characters to pick he picks the character who’s already considered dark and twisted to begin with)
Literally everyone with half a brain has suggested this instead but
>M-muh multiverse
Autism Shats all over it
They will break records if they make horse show expy character
I see the logic. But I think maybe the idea is just a bit flawed, past kids want to see stuff they know turn corrupt. A sort of gateway horror that has a familiar core. The characters they want to work with just aren't that interesting to corrupt so a parody would have the same issue. Both Bugs Bunny and Rugs Rabbit having static bleeding eyes is equally dumb. You see people have success with rubber hose styled characters. I think there is inherently something weirder and more unsettling there. Or maybe it is just to do with age. However Finn and Jake or Penn and Blake but they are corrupted by evil internet juice is always gonna be eyerolling.
What about spooky words, but a horse guy!
How about both? New characters and old characters mixed together?
This. They even made a knock off Care Bear Pibby uses as a weapon in the short. It's likely that they would have done it to imitate shows not owned by Warner, but the idea is actually there.
>fnf sprite
Funny that, it seems the fnf gays were actually correct in how pibby designs would look like
i mean i did consider the possibility they’d use MADTV spunchbop considering they had a background from the show
but ii did not factor in the care bear tho
and even a bear
It would also make more sense to use cutesy licenced character as main hero vs other licened character - that would allow for grater impact. Imagine if they really changed Pibby for like Bluey or even character from Paw patrol.
>that would allow for grater impact.
For many it doesn't. The concept gets called edgy and cringy a lot cause it feels like a kid mashing their toys together but wanting it to be grown up. Original characters give a space to fully shape an original narrative. Letting you build in some darker element to exploit rather than reaching for an out of place anime reference. Leaning on its the character you know but dark can take some out of the scene.
>Original characters give a space to fully shape an original narrative
In this case there's only one OC and they are kind of shit? That's why it comes off as a weird power fantasy of the creator's donut steel
That's not true, the trailer shows that fat cat lady and a robin expy
I can't believe I see anons on here actually defend this shit
They are still doing it
It would be funny if wasn't so sad
bird site said pibby bad so pibby good
You know that sonic was made be japanese people so get out to Cinemaphile or Cinemaphile
No everyone blindly shares the same opinion.
Apparently it wasn't just a generic "meme culture is le bad", but it was specifically someone making a YouTube Poop that kicked off the corruption at some point in the planning stages.
Wasn't that supposed to be part of a fake leak script?
You tell pibbygay since you are the only one who actually cares to look for proof with something like this
>Source: Dude, trust me
Yosemite Sam is my favorite Looney Tune.
I love him too, but for me, it's Taz.
For me it’s honesty bugs
So, is the first form of the corruption just the original character, but slightly different in design and more of an butthole? If so, I think that concept is pretty cool as a start.
What would you change about the meaning of the darkness/glitch?
The reboots are corrupting the characters
I think that idea would work better if it had 'clones' like the Mandela catalogue.
I guess. But I think it would be better if it represented something.
Maybe it can represent the changes in TV or how the outside world can influence cartoons.
I don't think it really matters what it means. I think it is better if it just exists to be an antagonist in the story.
corporate slop is killing western animation.
I honestly don't fricking know. My brain is too stupid to think of something meta, what if its just the kind of stuff thats super infectious to toons or whatever
By making it Zalgo.
I kind of like the idea that like Bunny Snatchers it's some kind of corporate nihilism as they lose everything that makes them themselves. Like a "soul vs. soulless" and they're like The Nothing from The Neverending Story.
I don't remember if they ever explained what The Nothing was but I always thought "and people with no dreams are easy to control" was something like that with the death of imagination. Sometimes IPs start to feel hollow once they've moved from something that was mainly money but also brought their artists and fans some joy into something that feels more like a joyless obligation for everyone that loses everything that made it what it was. I guess something nihilistic.
So what would be the end goal?
Make it a metaphor for how Cartoon Network is slowly having more and more of it's broadcast time given to Adult Swim.
Literally anything potentially interesting about this show would work better if Gumball did it.
I thought you people were complaining that it wasn't 'original'.
>Trended for four days straight after the announcement that it wasn't getting greenlit
>Trending AGAIN just today
I know this pilot has its share of detractors (mostly really overblown and performative) but WBD were pretty damn stupid not to greenlight something with this much exposure. This is the kind of brand awareness companies piss millions of dollars away for.
>Trended
Anon, that doesn't mean shit, you can trend on Twitter with a few thousand posts.
But it takes a constant stream of engagement to keep it trending for more than a couple hours.
And a constant stream of a few thousand posts doesn't mean shit, especially on a platform as autistic as Twitter.
That'd be like using the number of Cinemaphile threads a property gets to gauge popularity as if you don't know that this site is full of autists who will keep a thread bumped for weeks.
>a constant stream of a few thousand
Anon, do you know how numbers work? When you have a "constant stream" of a "few thousand" it becomes "many thousands."
Like, this isn't even a good argument. I don't know why you're even still replying.
>When you have a "constant stream" of a "few thousand" it becomes "many thousands."
Anon, do you not know how twitter works?
It only polls for number of tweets every hour or so.
Dropping in and out of the trending page with a few thousand tweets is, again, nothing.
And don't sit here and lie and say that it's been trending all day, because it hasn't.
https://trends24.in/united-states/
I don't think you understand how Twitter works, something that trends for you is not something that's generally trending, it's usually showing up because it's related to your interests.
Regardless, if you use Twitter to gauge what shows should or shouldn't be greenlit, you are a fricking moron.
Oh, frick off with this techie autism. Yes, we all know that in reality, everything about Twitter is fake bullshit. That doesn't stop companies from spending tens of thousands of dollars to get the exact kind of "Twitter clout" this show's getting.
I wasn't even trying to argue for or against the show. I was making a point that it has brand awareness and a significant fanbase, and you're sitting here splitting hairs and hyper-analyzing details in a super pedantic, autistic manner instead of focusing on the core point.
>Oh, frick off with this techie autism.
Not my fault you're a fricking moron who's easily fooled by the algorithm like every other fricking moron in this industry.
>focusing on the core point.
What core point?
You have no core point, MY core point is that your personal Twitter trends don't mean shit, you seeing a hashtag that says "trending in US" doesn't mean it's popular because YOU are only seeing that hashtag because it's something you personally are interested in.
Again, twitter trends, online "impressions," and any other fake bullshit are meaningless when it comes to a show's actual popularity and ability to pull in a *paying* audience.
>What core point?
Exactly. You're a moron and can't get it.
I accept your concession.
I'm sorry that you're an idiot, continue being easily-fooled because you're too lazy to spend 5 minutes on google looking up the actual raw numbers for how much a "trending topic" is actually trending.
>I accept your concession.
If by "concession" you mean "autism medication" remember to take two tablets, homosexual.
Thank god your autistic show got canned.
and yet you're the one seething and arguing with people like the butthurt one.
I'm explaining how the internet works to a moron since apparently you don't understand it.
You're the one seething like a gay because you don't want to accept that your pitch isn't as popular as you think it is.
>I'm explaining how the internet works to a moron
So stop talking to the mirror.
I'm sorry about your butthurt anon, maybe next time your pitch will get picked up.
Hello?
An ideal thread to repost this classic.
What dumbass included someone posting a comic with a bunch of replies but didn't include the comic in the screencap?
>Yosodomy Chainsaw Sam
I still can't get over that dodge used Chainsaw man out all things as inspiration
At least it wasn't something like resident evil
On a surface level it kinda makes sense in a clunky way, but it shouldn't been a total 1=1 copy
I repeat
The showrunner only had working with Sanjay and Craig and Pinky Malinky as his only experience in the industry and even then he was only a storyboard artist or a background artist
He had no way the necessary wit or brains to pull something like pibby and not suck ass
Everyone has to start somewhere. Besides, there were some interesting concepts but Pibby needed more polish.
Clearly it needed refinement, but it was in the initial pilot stage when we even first saw it. It's a little unfair to judge if it would've been good or not based only on what we saw so far. Things can change so dramatically from pilot to finished product.
But pretty much everybody but a handful of tryhards agrees there's a lot of potential there for something really good. A premise as simple as "a horror story with a meta-plotline about cartoons, with a Dora the Explorer type character who has to go through an 'Ash from Evil Dead' arc" is pretty solid.
Damn shame we can't have a decent thread about it because that same autisticly obsessed group of Internet Tough Guys stalk every thread and flood it with schzio shit, almost like Dodge Greenley strangled their mothers to death with his bare hands, and they're on a desperate crusade to stop him at any cost.
It's like being in high school.
>guy
Oh.
No comeback needed.
>guy got roasted by a pibby fan of all people
If I was guy right now I'd definitely consider doing a flip.
>Lame comeback
Like a wienerroach
There doesn't need to be an elaborate backstory for not liking it. People going into animation need to be better at making cartoons people like that are good
>But its better than your typical globohomosexual beanmouth shit by a mile.
Not an achievement, doesn't even make it sound better whatsoever
No dubs, no truth
>People going into animation need to be better at making cartoons people like that are good
But what about Pibby is bad? That's what I'm saying. You guys are saying "it needed to be a better cartoon", but I never hear actual critiques on why its a bad cartoon.
It legitimately feels like there is no reason. Like a person who says a picture is bad because they don't like the artist, and so they'll never say why its bad, or they'll make up some reason on the fly, and so it sorta sounds weird.
I think the protagonist is kinda bland, honestly this show would've been way better if it had an Abobo's Big Adventure-style protagonist
That entirely misses the point. The premise of having a preschool show MC going through these events is supposed to set up for a loss of innocence storyline for her to grow from - this is obvious from the trailer, and ties in with the corruption of characters from known childhood cartoons. What would the character arc even be if it was a grown person who was already acquainted with violence and loss?
>inb4 they just kill the cartoon characters and focus on corruption lore
That would reduce the show to being deviantart cringe only with no redeeming qualities.
Don't ever reply to Guy. He is a delusional homosexual around these parts.
Ok I'm messaging industry people again, thanks. And his brain is already trained by the industry not to listen to me, what are you afraid of, that programming falling apart?
>Trying to sneak around his desire to tell me to commit suicide
Not going to work, I see right through you. Shut up Homestuck fan
Shut up with pagan nonsense for Cinemaphile culture as well
Then your brain is just filtering out all the critiques that are being made and repeating them isn't going to do anything for you. OP is a critique.
I dedicated 5 years of my life as a teenager solely to inspiring other artists to make media better for kids, there is no bait. And you're projecting your mental issues.
>Then your brain is just filtering out all the critiques
>OP is a critique.
OP is a sentence that I'm supposed to read and then gather the meaning from. I can assume OP is making fun of the "dark and edgy" sentence when showing a picture of Sam, and then a very slightly more edgy picture of Sam that's honestly more in character for him, but that'd just be an assumption.
Why be so esoteric about it? When I'm talking about a cartoon I don't like, I just say "The steven universe characters are all shit heads and it makes watching the show difficult.
I don't quote Steven and then say "Oh, my critiques in the OP".
>Shut up Homestuck fan
No indication that he is a Homestuck fan, you schizo
So, do people here only hate Pibby because people liked it? What makes the show so contemptable besides usual Cinemaphilentrarians hating POPULAR THING?
I'll admit, its not too unique of a premise when you think about it. Its typical "heroes journey" or "hero fights corruption" stuff. But its better than your typical globohomosexual beanmouth shit by a mile.
People compare it to Kingdom Hearts often, and for good reason. The only thing I'd change about Pibby is that despite getting an eyepatch and chainsaws or whatever, she'd still be a goofy little kid when everything's done. Maybe I'd even make the show more of a comedy.
>So, do people here only hate Pibby because people liked it?
I'm pretty apathetic about it for the most part, I just think this kind of crossover stuff is inherently kind of lame.
I think it works fine as a short or maybe a 50 minute film, but I don't see this working all that well as a series.
Frankly, I think people would shit on it less if it didn't involve any Warner characters.
Probably people trying to be on the "right side" of a backlash so they don't get made fun of for liking something "cringe." But it's getting to a point where it's so absurd and dramatic that Pibby-hate might become the new "cringe." and the merry-go-round of internet bullshit will keep spitting us all up and shitting us out, making us dumb and gay.
Also notorious baitposters like guy jumped in on it. So I imagine part of it is literally just bait.
Which guy exactly?
That guy guy.
It likely would end up having comedy in the final product. You need something to pad it out. It's how Don't Hug Me I'm Scared was able to be stretched into proper episode runtimes when it became a show.
1. "Old cartoon characters but edgy" has been way overdone for decades. I don't think that makes this bad, but it does mean it would need to put in work to stand out. For both comedy and drama, people have mentioned Epic Mickey, Kingdom Hearts, Drawn Together, Robot Chicken, Family Guy cutaway gags, Velma, Loonatics Unleashed, Bendy and the Ink Machine, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, etc., etc. Some have been good, some bad.
2. Old Looney Tunes cartoons were so violent and edgy they are now censored because violence and guns and shit bad etc. So I think that's why "edgy Yosemite Sam" is making the rounds as a little weird, his "uncorrupted" version is the OOC one.
3. Pibby as an OC/new character and the show is about her killing everyone's favorite cartoon characters does feel a bit goofy. I feel like we all wrote a Mary Sue fanfiction with this plot but noticed that reading other people's Mary Sue fanfictions were less fun.
Otherwise sure it could be good.
OH YEAH one more thing.
I think both Pibby's appeal + cringe is that as soon as you turn, I don't know, 8-12 years old and learn to use photos hope, you write a creepypasta with Squidward committing suicide, play with a pic to make his eyes look black and pixellated, and then laugh for 5 hours because LOL CARTOON BUT EDGY.
Then you go to post it and...5 million other kids have ALREADY posted a story about Squidward Commits Suicide with a pixelated thumbnail of Squidward with black eyes.
Then you go rewatch some old episodes of SpongBob Squarepants and oh yeah the show itself already had ultragore in episodes huh.
So it's nostalgia for a simpler time because sure, everyone did this as a kid, and so did the cartoon shows that we watched as kids.
But also. EVERYONE did this. As a KID.
Anon, people hated it since day 1, even before it was "POPULAR THING"
>Its typical "heroes journey" or "hero fights corruption" stuff. But its better than your typical globohomosexual beanmouth shit by a mile.
Is it? The entire premise is "The evils of the internet and meme culture ruin and corrupt the innocent, iconic and recognizable corporately sanctioned depictions of IPs, and Pibby must fight it to save the cartoons." I cannot imagine anything more globohomosexual than finger wagging about meme culture, especially using characters that should have long been in the public domain.
There could be a million Pibby fans, and I would still say it sucks.
There could be a billion Pibby fans, and I would still say it sucks.
These defensive ass posts read like people new to the site despite the bluster and bluff of using the buzzwords, you should be used to people disliking shit for whatever reasons. If you really want to stick it to the meanie anons, instead of theorizing why we dislike it, maybe just cape for it on the social medias that matter. You're not doing it any favors by having no arguments here other than "nuh-uh" or "you suck"
Eh, you read into it too much. Corruption is typical zalgo stuff. If anything it wouldn't exist without memes.
This is literally what the fricking corruption is meant to be. https://youtube.com/watch?v=tGFIOk-F770&pp=ygUXbGVha2VkIHBpYmJ5IHN0b3J5Ym9hcmQ%3D
Overanalyzing is a sign of autism
Do you want to talk about this cartoon or not? If you just want people to blow hot air about how epic this shit is, go to Reddit.
seethe more zoom zoom
brain rot is killing you since you cannot articulate an insult other than "autism"
if the most goyslop garbage made for an "april fools" prank was loved by people with little to no knowledge of a good show other than: >CARTOON CREEPYPASTA GOOD, SPOOKY AND EDGY BUT WITH CUTE CHRACTERS SOO ORIGINAL
doesn't give you an idea of how shitty the show is or the people who watch it, then I can't tell you any more than what everyone else has already told you.
Looking around, outside of Cinemaphile, by far the most common complaint seems to be that if you were online in the 2000s and 2010s, you saw little kids everywhere making exactly this sorta stuff so it feels "creatively bankrupt" to try to make it a real show instead of a joke trailer or something.
I'm not saying that I agree, but what's your response to this popular criticism? I think the point critics elsewhere are making is that this is too much of a cliche, and something amateurs, and children, tended to do, so they think it's either tired or maybe also that it feels kind of dumb.
>I'm not saying that I agree, but what's your response to this popular criticism?
Naturally, my response is that nothing's new, and instead its up to the people using something common to make something unique. Look at Street Fighter and Tekken for example. If you let your creative ideas start with "I'm going to be BRAND NEW"; you'll never make anything since you really can't be "brand new" anymore.
>Look at Street Fighter and Tekken for example
That seems like a really bad example and if anything shows the issue with Pibby. SF transformed the fighting game genre, it set standards and although seems stereotypical now really set what those were. Ryu is a stereotype but has become the cornerstone of the stereotype. Tekken wasn't so much a response to SF as it was Virtua Fighter. Along with it they set standards for a sub genre, and you can see the designs evolving into more modern tropes.
Pibby fails at all of these. Its late to the party in concept, isn't evolving the idea and doesn't even seem to have that deep an interest in the shows it wants to mess with. The most it seems to be offering is a straight forward zombie apocalypse normal person has to become a badass survivor. I notice most seem to jump back to this and the story could've been so cool. But 99% of fan discussion is what if cartoon character had a fricked up face. When it isn't even doing it that well. Constant let them be unoriginal they'll get to the good part soon probably didn't help the show's pitch.
>you saw little kids everywhere making exactly this sorta stuff so it feels "creatively bankrupt" to try to make it a real show instead of a joke trailer or something. I'm not saying that I agree, but what's your response to this popular criticism?
The difference is that those things lacked any real fricking story. Pibby has a real protagonist with a plot and conflict to go with it. What can you tell me about the protagonists of Sonic exe or Dead Bart? What compeling conflict or character trait did they have? Nothing. They don't really exist and those things consisted of a basic narration about spooky imagery. Pibby is leagues more creative for at least trying to form a coherent story with actual characters like Pubby herself and her two companions.
Enter
Nes Godzilla
I was going to mention NES Godzilla as an exception. It had a lot more effort put into it than most creepypastas back then.
I think these are fair responses.
Pibby would have been held rightly to a higher standard than anything made by kids, hobbyists, fans as a professional production. Maybe it would have met and far surpassed them.
I think skepticism is fair since as mentioned some people think if you have an actor put on a Winnie the Pooh costume and stab someone while shouting "Frick!" that's hilarious and you're done, but it's really only enough for a joke trailer or clip. Maybe we'll never know if they could have fleshed this out into a whole story.
>What compeling conflict or character trait did they have
What the frick is compelling about Pibby?
>uhh, preschool character has to kill DXDX
DHMIS already did this ten times better, the idea of an innocent character being thrust into mature situations isn't anything new, see The Long Long Holiday (Historical Fiction Drama), Vermin (Black Comedy), and Steven Universe (adventure show), even if I don't care for it. These are all better examples because they wrote characters who happened to be innocent, rather than a flat character who's only characteristic is "innocent", and thus the growth would be inorganic because the character has absolutely no other interests than
>le learning hurr durr, I'm a dora knockoff
Nothing about Pibby as a character is compelling unless you've never consumed any media in your life.
>unless you've never consumed any media in your life.
In all fairness it is fine to have a gateway show. It is obvious a lot of people who get very excited about the concept and defend it are fairly young. However I do absolutely see something like this gaining a very obnoxious adult fan base. Who would become very demanding about everything.
>What the frick is compelling about Pibby?
You're missing the point that Pibby has an actual character. By compelling, I mean there is something that is actually there to know and potentially get attached to. People who keep comparing Pibby to old creepypasta fail to realize that the ones based on cartoons all sucked for being the same boring narrations of shocking content. There is no character arcs or plot to them. This what makes Pibby more unique in comparison, which is the whole point of my argument. Whether or not you personally find Pibby herself compelling is subjective. After all, the show does not actually exist yet. From what we can see in the pitch bible they did have an arc for her. Just because DHMIS did a similar concept doesn't mean others can't do it. It's not like originality exists that much. Puppets in messed up situations have been done since Meet the Feebles. Candle Cove is also a thing that exists concerning puppets and horror.
>You're missing the point that Pibby has an actual character
Don't pretend that most of the fan's focus isn't but what if this show's characters got all fricked up. Seeing as it doesn't actually exist Pibby doesn't actually have the characters or arcs you're hyping up. It has a few fairly generic ideas and some pretty awful ones like the black stuff is internet culture. Could be great or awful. Nothing inherently mind blowing. Having story doesn't make it unique. If this story is oh so great it shouldn't need to lean on the crossover elements. But every single thing used to hype it up has been the crossover.
I feel like you're just proving his point. Falling back on well nothing is original. Sorry but no you can take a unique approach to old ideas.
The usual reason for that format is immersion which is supposed to add to the creepiness. The ultimate issue with this is trying to marry the standard format with the creepypasta format, in one you lose some of the immersion the conceit that "this is really happening" and the other you're not really doing character well. I think that's anon's point, Pibby having a character doesn't matter if she seems to be a pretty weak cliche.
I don't necessarily hate Pibby, I just find the concept really dull. It's been done a million times before at the most fundamental level (Cute character faces evil) and even at the more specific level (Cute character faces evil versions of established cartoon characters). People bring up Deviantart a lot in these threads and they're right, it sincerely feels like the kind of thing you'd see on Deviantart with Sigmario and the like. It's like the very first thing your brain jumps to when you think "What if I wanted to take a character, but make it edgy for adults?" There's nothing to actually make the concept work beyond a special, it'd get boring really fast. Additionally if the Yosemite Sam sketches are anything to go by the creator doesn't seem to fundamentally understand some of the characters he's working with, Yosemite Sam was always a gun-shooting butthole and his uncorrupted version ironically looks like some other character wearing Yosemite Sam's skin.
Now the people that bend over backwards to defend the concept, those people I find extremely annoying because it seems like they're either insanely young, media illiterate, or are willingly ignoring how many people are telling them this is just an old concept that doesn't have any legs.
Yeah I definitely wouldn't watch this TO see Looney Tunes or Yosemite Sam or any of these cartoon characters. Yosemite Sam does look out of character before he's corrupted.
If it's just Pibby fighting generic alien glitch zombie monsters that look like Zim, Johnny Bravo, Samurai Jack, Finn & Jake, etc. that's a funny detail I guess but it doesn't provide enough to tune in past maybe a special. Kingdom Hearts was less superficial about the mea crossover, it wasn't just the new characters grinding generic Heartless that happened to look like some Disney characters which is what this looks like.
I don't think that hypothetical Kingdom Hearts would be bad necessarily but the idea that it's a tie in is almost false advertising.
Sorry wasn't trying to say they got the IP permission for IZ, AT, etc. and can't even remember what they would try for except "wouldn't bother with Disney presumably" just the "watch this OC kill things that look like all your favorite cartoon characters." I mean, okay.
I remember how Villainous had little bits of Black Hat dunking on various cartoon villains. That was funny, but some people wanted to see him actually go from show to show beating up all the cartoon villains, and that'd probably make me hate the character as an OC power fantasy Mary Sue thing.
So say Pibby beats the shit out of Bugs Bunny and kills him the way any zombie movie protagonist would kill any zombie. That's just Michonne from The Walking Dead killing some Walkers but it has a funny cartoon skin/mod on it.
>his uncorrupted version ironically looks like some other character wearing Yosemite Sam's skin.
He's basically the pod person version of Sam
Bunny Snatchers creeped me out more than Pibby.
That's because it was animated to really feel like a classic Looney Tunes short and understood how the characters acted, so the weird replacement characters stood out even more. It feels right in line with Chuck Jones era Looney Tunes outside of their designs so it makes them feel especially out of place. Frick they even got the orchestral music down to a T.
I thought it was creepy, but as I learned more about cheaply animated cartoons, I began to appreciate the episode way more. Some people will say that explaining a joke ruins it, but I think the extra knowledge actually enhances the episode.
>globohomosexual beanmouth shit
Black person, the fricking character design is absolute beanmouth shit, holy God damn.
It's because the entire concept was a beaten dead horse the second the trailer came out
This kind of crap was something I and people on DeviantArt and similar sites did since learning of Zalgo and Sonic.exe years ago, down to a lot of points.
Add that the protagonist is weirdly Mary Sue-ish in its characterists, and that the angle for the Static was "Metaphor of meme culture and people using cartoon characters wrong" and you have a show that's probably going to be crap.
>Metaphor of meme culture and people using cartoon characters wrong
I thought anons would eat up that last part. There are always anons around here b***hing about how media should be gate kept from normies since they ruin what they touch.
>Bitching about normalgays invading niche spaces and ruining shit means they obviously want a mainstream cartoon to take stale memes and cliches and push them even further
Thank makes no fricking sense, are you a literal moron?
>Not wanting a piece of media say frick you to as many normies as possible
"Cartoon... but dark!" is the most normalgay thing possible. It's like how at the end of Dora the Explorer when she asked kids what their favorite part of the episode was, how they'd always come up with depraved shit in response. That's the whole premise of this show. Kids saying "I liked it when Swiper pulled out a gun and shot Boots!" to Dora at the end of an episode.
>>Not wanting a piece of media say frick you to as many normies as possible
You already have rpg maker games that do it alot
The mainstream taking something that used to be niche isn't saying frick you to normalgays, it's just repackaging something you liked for them.
>she'd still be a goofy little kid when everything's done
nah, veteran pibby giving mature lessons to kids is peak
>But its better than your typical globohomosexual beanmouth shit by a mile
This entire thing is blindingly globohomo
>muh genre tropes
>muh multiverse
>muh deconstruction
Just a bunch of subversive, surreptitious bullshit. Pure zogslop.
>This entire thing is blindingly globohomo
I still think its better than your standard fair cartoon shit you get nowadays. Like it feels more unique, and less like the standard Steven Universe tier slop.
And besides, it appeals the people's edgy teenaged phase. At least that's fun.
>Like it feels more unique
You are fricking moronic, uniqueness means jack shit if the final product is terrible and doesn't make any good use of the ideas
We don't even have the final product and might never get it.
>might never get it
At this pace not by official source anyway
>more unique
That's not what surreptitious means.
Tails gets trolled manages to get revered as high art but Pibby doesn't
What a world
It's different
VERY different
the main problem with Pibby is that the only way to make it good or entertaining would be to pretty much do 1:1 the plot of Fionna & Cake, and that's already done now.
The after Sam is something that could happen in the new looney tunes show like he gets a gun license and then shenanigans ensue
>the new looney tunes show
Frick not that one the 2011 sitcom-like one
I'd be a lot more into this idea is the corrupt goop was less oh so edgy, and more making things a bit out of control. Like instead of Sam is a crazy monster, and sort of real looking guns means everyone dies with blood and guts. It instead still work on cartoon logic. The conflict has escalated to an actual war but a very silly one with maybe a hint things are going to get distorted if this keeps up. Maybe play into the idea of a cartoon being used for some other purpose like propaganda. They need help solving it so the episode can end.
Meh. Other Anon had a better idea (funny creative freedom vs neutered brand safety).
Do you think Dodge is lurking these threads and twitter threads to see how to improve Pibby? Because right now discussions are flying out of orbit by the huge amount heat they create.
I'd tell him to commit kys for bringing this shit into existence
>how to improve Pibby?
He’s in the wrong place. People are just hating it because the masses told them to.
Most of those “discussions” are people shitting on it for the most minor reasons imaginable.
He's an Instagram gay
He will avoid this place like a plague, which is for the better honestly
The hope was that this show was about the lose of one's innocence and how they have to del with it in an apocalyptic situation and that the crossover element would just a cherry on top while it's all focused on Pibby herself.
But reality is often disappointing.
>crossover element would just a cherry on top
Then they should've remove that cherry
And what made pibby supposedly different is that while others crossover protags maintain their innocence and childlike wonder pibby turns it into steeled determination and hope to make everything better despite all is going to hell
>while others crossover protags maintain their innocence and childlike wonder
No they fricking don't, have you ever read a single crossover story in your entire life?
Pibbygays are legitimately media illiterate so I doubt it.
I think they meant official crossover media. Not edgy fanfic shit like Grim Tales or Powerpuff Girls D.
Anon there are literally dozens of crossover comics where the MC gets mindbroken.
Such as? I only see this happening in unofficial fan comics. Corpos always like playing it safe.
Deadpool kills the marvel universe is the most famous and well known example
And that story sucks major ass
I liked when he went to kill Moby Dick
It's fricking Deadpool
Of course it was going to be fricked up
Ironically, despite what you believe, traumatized and mindbroken protags are more common than normal protags
I'd like it if she had catch phrases like this. Something like "This attack was brought to you by the letter DIE!!!!!!!"
I think my issue is, no matter where I land on this whole Pibby situation, I think the series would be better as a dark comedy with combat and disturbing imagery. Something that's clearly not meant to be taken too serious. Yet edgelords thinks its supposed to be some serious story of a cute character getting brutalized or other dumb stuff.
If it got green lit it likely was going to be dark action comedy. The original short had the joke of Pibby trying to literally defeat the corruption with the power of love using a knock off Care Bear.
Yes that's the point
>Yet edgelords thinks its supposed to be some serious story of a cute character getting brutalized or other dumb stuff.
I feel like Pibby's fanbase online is, and I'm not trying to make a mocking joke here, but the sort of 8-13 year old kid set that is unironically into creepypastas and sees them as deep and moody instead of the sort of goofy ironic enjoyment that older people looking back fondly on that kid phase get from them.
I just don't think that phase lasts beyond the preteen years for the vast majority of people, and even then, I wonder how big of a crowd that is, especially these days? Decades ago, it seemed like people who had a "goth or emo" preteen phase liked that unironically, but that wasn't everyone. But I don't know. I just wonder how much a target audience for a serious take on this really is.
I think we will most likely never know now but it's kind of like, that's what was getting Pibby all of the attention. Does that make it the carrot that pulls people in to a good series? Or is there nothing there and this is one of those things where a small handful of related clips get millions of views on YouTube, but nobody watches the show or makes it otherwise...monetization friendly? It's really not worth the money to get all of these characters and make a full series if all you get is five clips that get as many views as Amanda's soap cutting videos or someone's dog vomiting
I mean worst of all it IS actually a great show but all people care about is "lOlOL CrEepYpAsTa" for one whole fricking week as a crazy popular meme that makes absolutely NO fricking money and is then utterly forgotten reminding people that western animation is a lost cause and so is the internet beyond linking everything to an Amazon product order page
If your creation, be it a comic, animated series, novel or any other medium in the entertainment industry, requires or borrows famous foreign characters or IPs, then your project is doomed to failure before it even born.
It happened several times with pokemon comics that brats use to put their OCs on just to have Daddy Nintendo CAD their sorry buttholes.
damn, it's already a pain in the ass to even "borrow" and use other people's ocs from other artists if the project administration is shit, more than likely it's hell trying to do that with different companies, just to later have your project falling apart or is canceled mid-life since the other parties chose not to continue with the plot
my advice? Create your own fricking OCs, you can do plagiarism disguised as satire and call it a day
Ready Player One almost completely consist of original IPs and it made bank at the bookstores and movie theaters.
Hey, moron, they were never going to use properties outside of Warner.
>Inb4 SpongeBob and Rocko were in it.
Just their environmental aesthetic. They were definitely going to use parodies because they created a bootleg Care Bear for the short instead of actually using one for parody. Even the villain cat lady is a stand in for Disney villains like Cruella. They clearly intended to blend OCs and established characters like Disney did with Wreck It Ralph. Don't get me wrong the usage of Warner characters is likely to be hassle. Companies can be bureaucratic as frick in them. Does anyone have the screen cap of Maxwell Atoms explaining how ridiculous it was to use Fred Flintstone in Billy and Mandy despite both properties owned by Warner?
You guys are still arguing about this failed pilot?
Let it go, man.
You don't know how resilient an anon with real autism is
Creepypasta with a budget
That is the appeal yes
So some dedicated pibbygay will actually do something about it? Grab all this criticisms and turn into something actually worth a damn, or maybe you aren't dedicated enough to what you love.
Just let go man it's over
Im starting to believe that this thread is inhabited by a discord server or underages because this shouldn't have lasted this long
A lot of bad threads last for way too long on this board
>Thread is having genuine discussion
>"no it must be discord and underages"
Also this is fricking Cinemaphile
>Blaming discord bogeymen
This anon gets scared when genuine autism is accepted
Where are the hyperrealistic blood and details
Truly horrifying
Who the frick makes these
>Stop staring me with em big eyes!
Yosemite Sam if he real
I really shouldn't have opened that spoiler
Everything about this is bait
>Lore bait
>Schizo bait
>Autism bait
>Underage bait
How do you keep defending it is unreal
Even as what it is it spawned the predictable awful shit in just it's first week
Can't wait for the pibby version of this
?si=mvDNf_pLN63d-FVj
I made this meme as a dumb joke, but it's validated more and more every time one of these threads is made.
>I like Pibby because it's a fun, silly, spooky cartoon thing
>[Brings out an entire novel of over-analyzation, psudeo-intellectual rambling about 'media literacy' and rants about internet cringe culture]
Go back
I've been here since 2009, and you probably didn't even hit puberty by then. You go back.
The sharty is gone
There nowhere else to go back to
>He doesn't know
You making this meme somehow ruins your own meme.
like I didn't even make this shit to make people seethe and yet every time, every friggin' time, I get 4-5 replies of pure, unfiltered "I'M NOT MAD, YOU'RE MAD!"
Is hating Pibby some kind of autistic hyperfixation now? Like how tards make GoAnimate videos about grounding Cailou and Dora the Explorer? Like I see trannies and IRL basedjacks joining in on the bandwagon on Twitter and shit. There's normal "I don't like this show, I think the concept is bad" and then there's "FRICK YOU AND DIE FOR LIKING IT I'M GLAD IT GOT CANCELLED I SHIT MYSELF IN RAGE EVERY TIME I SEE IT"
Could be an internet tough guy thing. "Ewww, this is cringe! Kids like it! and I'm an edgy adult whose way cooler than little b***h kids!"
However, the presence of guy in this thread suggests it's probably mostly bait. "Bait" might be too polite a word. "Attention whoring" is more appropriate.
gay creepypasta bullshit
>"FRICK YOU AND DIE FOR LIKING IT I'M GLAD IT GOT CANCELLED I SHIT MYSELF IN RAGE EVERY TIME I SEE IT"
none of those replies were anything like this. take meds
So are you posting bait, or are you genuinely lacking basic insight?
It's always been bait.
>makes meme about how the "mean pibby haters" spend time writing angry novel length posts
>gets responded with shit like "lol rejected"
>makes overly passionate projection laden post in response
>with no self awareness whatsoever
40 keks
lemme fix that for you
>Make a meme calling anti-Pibby gays angry tryhards who shit their pants when they get called out as tryhards
>Flood of angry tryhards scream "NO I'M NOT MAD YOU'RE SHOW GOT CANCELLED FRICK YOU"
>Literally prove the meme right.
provide examples of your definition of "tryhard" from this same thread
your cartoon got rejected
i like that pibby got rejected
what are you going to do now?
fixed it for you
>Praising schizos of any kind
Fake and gay
True and straight
>Ruined it for you
ftfy
>shitpost turns into serious Yosemite Sam thread
Nice.
More like Pibby hijacked Sam's thread
Or more like she knocked him out
and took over
Learning with Pibby vs Picrel
Which crossover series is more Kino?
I would've said Space Jam if the sequel didn't happen. Now I say Pibby. Space Jam 2 was an affront to God and all his creations. At least Pibby *fricking tried* to do something interesting with its crossover instead of vomiting WB properties on the screen in a George Lucas special edition seizure fit.
One is funny
The other isn't
I think we are done here
>Cartoonito Sam
>[as] Sam
I can't say if this is an improvement or downgrade from the smiley goo zombies
Oh who I am kidding this is worse
I hated the generic zombie-like trope but this is like the complete polar opposite of that and I hate even it more because it starts to feel like it came from vizziepop's overdesigned hell and demolishes the characters even more
Fan art galleries are gonna get flooded even more with this nonsense.
I don't know, I don't HATE this. At least it incorporates the character design a bit, like being a centipede with multiple backpacks and two swords on the back like insect parts. There's a kind of concept.
I feel like if this was just fan art of someone making a fun thing this would be fine. Or if this was from an episode of Adventure Time and Finn had a dream about insect versions of all of them. That would be fine.
I'm not sure what's bothering me. I think this all just feels too much like Kingdom Hearts or Epic Mickey but without any interest in or knowledge of the IPs or the characters at all. I mean it's just "Finn but creepy" and could have been made by someone who has only seen his design. It's not like it's Ice Finn or something that reflects Finn's fears or AT lore.
I understand that would require a few lines of exposition, but maybe that's the thing. The known characters look like just cannon fodder to the point that actually why bother even using them.
I actually watched some of that shitty Winnie the Pooh horror movie. There was absolutely nothing about it that the people making the movie couldn't have gotten from a one paragraph vague description of Winnie the Pooh. I doubt they'd ever seen a part of any Winnie the Pooh cartoon much less read anything. Slapping the brand name on a generic horror film was all they did. It wasn't even as much fun as fanfiction or other organic fan projects.
This looks the same.
At least creepypastas often felt like there were written by actual fans.
Not sure if you're aware of Dead Meat, but he does kill counts of horror movies. He shit all over the Pooh horror movie.
Of course Blood and Honey was a slapdash cashgrab meant to beat everyone to the punch of gory Pooh since any edgy writer with common sense would wait for Tigger to lapse in 2024.
The design itself isn't bad but it has nothing to do with the character on any metaphorical level. Even noodle arms criticisms don't gel with this because noodles are serpents or eels, not centipedes. Calling it a worm doesn't make it a worm when its obviously a centipede
In mere effort alone, it's fine, better even.
But on every other front this is even more terrible than going basic, in this form you have to get more creative and think through and then you realize that unless it makes sense to the character's world to take this different form it begins to show that you are butchering them from what makes them special and unique in the first place.
You have to work smarter not harder, specially with characters people love with their whole hearts.
Finn would fit more as a butterfly-like corruption monster because, you know, the butterfly is referenced a lot in Adventure Time.
It's a pretty interesting design from a fantasy-horror perspective but it's not scary, the one we've seen in the pilot trailer is far more disturbing.
How the frick is that disturbing?
if you're not a toddler, it's still more disturbing than le centipede finn
Some of it is just the juxtaposition of Finn and Jake being supposedly dead, their visages distorted. They're something to hide from.
It might seem infantile but its the love of these characters that makes it strange, unnerving at least. Finn is the homie, and now his corpse is hunting another character.
i love how jake is a stock render given life
I like the freaky monsters more than just 'normal model + black shit all over' but you need to actually take aspects of their character rather than just multiplying visual features
here's some more interesting ones, the idea of 'Flintstones walk their cars = Flintstones become the car' is at least a little bit interesting and it's something with actual relevance to the character. The Jake design is cool too
Terrible, just terrible...
The biggest issue I have with these design is that animating them would be a nightmare
what about these designs...covered in black shit?
whoa.
When the frick is Shag And Scoob coming back.
The last one released on Halloween, so maybe that's going to be when the next comic drops...?
>Why Nintendo do not make racist mario canon?
look at the views!!
This is you Pibbygays
Too bad i bet the creator cannot accept criticism and go the drawn together route for his idea
rip
I'm now like 90% sure these threads are just guy bumping his own shit with his name off.
that *would* explain why no actual discussion has occured in the past 50-100 posts, and why every time the thread is about to sink down to page three or four, it's bumped with a new reply slinging shit at someone who said they liked pibby.
Almost like the entire point of this thread is just to stir shit.
Isn't that obvious with the OP talking shit?
Is this shit getting cancelled
Its in limbo. Neither picked up nor cancelled yet
I doubt this will see the light of day
No. It's just not greenlit yet. It might be a situation like Korgoth of Barbaria.
Eh, unlike Korgoth, animation isnt the problem but the crossover stuff (and Pibby is way more popular among normies than Korgoth was). They could easily just pull a Drawn Together and tweak the characters to get around it if they wanted
You will never have Ohio Skibidi Rizz, Pibby.
Worst type of deconstruction.
I don't know why the "before" version disturbs me more
I thinks that's the actual "fricked up" version of op's dark reality
Skibidi toilet and Banban were making pibbies in Ohio and I saw one of the pibbies and the pibby glitched at me
It's scary because its characters that you know
Why the frick there's STILL one single autist bumping this thread
I don't know, maybe the answer will surprise you!
Couldn't tell you. Once I figured out I was being bamboozled I walked away. This shit is just getting sad now.
I still have faith, but I acknowledged that officially pibby isn't going anywhere so I'll settle with best next thing and that is the genuine fan content that isn't content farm shit.
I'm pretty sure there will be some dedicated autists that will try and pick up the pieces left to make something good.
>so I'll settle with best next thing and that is the genuine fan content
Isn't exactly a high bar to honest then again everything about the real has been bottom of the barrel so you be you then and enjoy your knockoff shag and scob
Enjoy fnf shit for the rest of your life then pibbygay
Being a pibbygay must be suffering
Or just be immature children and manchildren
This shit wouldn't work because Uncle Grandpa would kill everyone instantly
What is there any Pibby fan content you liked?
The days after the short was dropped were by far the best times of pibby
Hmmmmm this is a bit overload don't ya think?
OP stop bumping your own thread.
OP here
Nah
Frick you then
>M4 with an ACOG and a flashlight/foregrip
Shoulda gone with either an M16A2 with an M203 grenade launcher or a Colt Model 727 with an Aimpoint 5000 mounted on the carry handle and a tactical flashlight ductaped on
Swap the left one to after and the right one to before and you will actually look convincing.