>"Dude, it's a giant head."
>"Dude it's a talking tree and a raccoon."
>"Dude, it's a bunch of mutant turtles and a rat."
>"Dude, it's a talking blue hedgehog and his friends fighting an egg shaped man."
>"Dude it's about a plumber that goes through pipes and fights weird mushroom monsters."
>"Dude it's a pink ball with eyes that sucks things up."
>"Stop taking all that seriously."
Rendering the barest possible description of a movie's premise to back the argument "the concept is ridiculous so it only works if it's funny" is the bane of modern media and needs to die horribly. Peoples inability to take seriously any fantastical or unorthodox premises and characters are what has been killing media for the past decade and a half.
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Nah
You and people like you don't give a shit about fricking anything, not even an argument to the contrary. Get fricked you worthless limp homosexual.
Goyslop isn't worthy of intelligent discussion
Blow me
Any art should be judged.
Art is not worth judging, even the masterpieces. They are literal wastes of time. The youth are obsessed with them and have abandoned their duties. It is a symptom of the corruption that plagues this new generation, along with their laziness and disrespect towards their elderly.
Artwork is important for society you LARPing spastic.
Farming, smithing and trade are important for society, not scrawling on stones with bright colours you fool. When has a painted tablet fed a man, or carried him like a mount, or protected from the bite of a sword, or cured his illness? A book is fine once or twice, but now everybody wants to write one. The heavenly father turns his face away from us in disgust.
>When has a painted tablet fed a man, or carried him like a mount, or protected from the bite of a sword, or cured his illness?
Worked pretty well for anyone who made money off of art commissions.
Yet another symptom of the corruption of the youth. They spend the hard earned wealth of their parents on worthless imagery. At least when they are the ones drawing they are doing something for themselves. This is even worse. We are doomed. The southern nomads will overrun and defile our city-states in decades.
My dude, if you are saying all of this shit is worthless then why the frick are you on the cartoon board, on Cinemaphile?
I suspect Pre-Akkadian-kun is not being entirely sincere.
All income in art is patronage from real production and infrastructure. Every single dollar earned by every artist since the dawn of time was paid for with dollars made from real manufacturing and agriculture, as an accessory to those core industries
Which is to say - all art is entirely subordinate to wealth owners. Art is a phenomenon servile to cultivation
If the point of life was merely survival, we would be ants, not humans.
And if we spend all our time on frivolities instead of necessities, we would be neither ants nor men, but corpses
You question my honesty? What do you take me for, that you treat me with contempt? All I have done is give voice to my thoughts on the matter
This is a really out of touch take. Perhaps in an ideal world art is important, but we live in the real world where art degrees are considered worthless and we spend the majority of our waking moments working and toiling.
And while I appreciate the fact of motivating and culture-affirming decorated infrastructure, all wealth and art remains pure patronage from real wealth earners
>you need a piece of paper in order to do something
lol
lmao
Agreed. I live in a monastery in the mountains and paint murals with the blood and entrails of goats I dont need no greedy merchant to tell me what to paint and what to not paint
That's because work provides actual challenges and rewards whereas art is masturbatory time wasting.
18+ website btw
Sir this is a cartoon board
>Art is not worth judging
is this your judgement?
Yeah, but saying that all media and audiences should conform to a unilateral goal is stupid too. Not only is it anti-art, it's basically impossible. You can't just say that no author or audience member is allowed to joke about something, ever.
Nobody said that.
>but saying that all media and audiences should conform to a unilateral goal is stupid too.
Good thing nobody says that.
Next time you have a thought like this, notice you’ve got nothing to say
his point goes into into the shitter when he got angry at rise of skywalker. Someone brought up his own tweet, and he claimed it was different
Let me guess, the original image is from a defence of Last Jedi even though the whole point of Last Jedi was that it tried (badly) to do something other than "dude space wizards for children" which is why it bombed with the core audience?
Yarp
normies can't handle anything fantastical/absurd because they don't want to be challenged they just consume product don't think just consume
>https://desuarchive.org/co/search/image/YTlxWYfhQoZCzZsSCjiJxA/type/op/
This again?
If you count the other variations of this thread then it's a lot more. Honestly feels like a bot that just cycles through the same topics with slight modifications.
>don’t you realize this is a gay baby movie
Yeah actually that is what we’re saying
All movies should be serious dramas in black and white. Fun and creativity have no place in the entertainment industry. The world needs movies that make arrogant snobs with impossible standards feel very smart and cultured and better than everyone else.
Or how about cinema stop constantly making fun of itself and allow the audience to experience emotion for one second?
t. snobs
You're a Disney brain cum guzzling moron.
Don't you have to go huff your own farts again? It's been, what, twenty seconds since your last fix? Thirty? I think that's a new record!
What world do you live in where you think that someone criticizing terrible Disney products is fart huffing? It's not even that controversial of a statement to say Disney is bad.
>Hey can movies take themselves a bit more seriously even with ridiculous concepts and just play them straight for once?
>"NOOO YOU JUST WANT ALL MOVIES TO BE ARTHOUSE STUFF NO FUN!!"
Lmfao?
>Hey can movies take themselves a bit more seriously even with ridiculous concepts and just play them straight for once?
Dude, you've spammed over and over about how you want insane grimdark shit in Sonic the Hedgehog and Disney. If all along all you wanted was less quips, why didn't you say that?
>dude, dad puts penis inside woman vegana and a new human is grown inside woman in 9 months
Mooregay, change your fricking diaper already.
Dude, it's a Mongolian basket-weaving forum.
If he’s talking about Disney Wars the sign should say
>this is a movie about space wizards intended for childless female social media users with college degrees
What are the first two supposed to be, is the first one MTV's The Head?
Nah, it's probably about MODOK (since that's a real quote by some Hollywood guy) and I assume Rocket and Groot
Modok, Groot and Rocket.
>It's a movie for children stop taking it seriously
>Your movie is shit then
>NOOOO YOU NAZI WHITE SUPREMACIST HOMOPHOBE REPUBLICAN
Dude, it's a cartoon board on a site for Taiwanese erotica.
>"the concept is ridiculous so it only works if it's funny
That's not what the OP pic was.
The pic was about people treating Star Wars like a sacred cultural heritage important enough to literally wish death to people over.
Folks treating a toy commerical with literal religious fervor isn't healthy
But why would one say this? What context did he have for saying it if not in the context of said film being criticized?
>"I'm not saying you can't take it seriously, just don't get too angry about it.
>"JJ Abrams how fricking dare you"
Lmao
He should take his own advice. He was right.
I find it odd that the people who keep using the "Star Wars is a movie for children" argument in the past few years are usually the ones who keep excessively defending Last Jedi
I think there is some truth to his statement, but using it to justify inconsistent bullshit because "why so serious" is dumb. I also think he is a coping hypocrite
>Dude it's a story about a kid who plugs a dam with his finger lol
>Dude it's a story about a turtle and a rabbit racing like when has that ever happened?
>Dude it's a story about wolf that wears sheep's fur like humans would lmao
>Real Geese don't lay golden eggs, moron
Anyone who excuses the core theme, morals, and internal logic of a story or it's inner workings based on surface level metaphors is one stupid fricking c**t. The presence of laser swords doesn't mean logic and consistency suddenly go out the window.
...are you genuinely mad that people don't take the story of the 3 Little Pigs seriously?
Real geese don't lay golden eggs, moron
138024202
If you don't understand a post you aren't FORCED to reply Anon.
>denying (You)s in a thread that maxes 10 replies in an hour
You're a sad frick.
Ok but star wars actually is for children
138024584
I guess something DOES force you to reply.
I don't think it's people in/ability to take things seriously, but just that anyone fields it as a super lame defense against why something they like but can't justify why is not allowed to be criticised or asked for it to be better.
Usually it's when Lefties can't argue anymore (about 2 replies in) so they go, "WHO FRICKING CARES" like a woman.
Yeah, exactly. "STOP TALKING ABOUT IT BECAUSE I CAN'T PROVE YOU WRONG" is the basic idea.
>STOP TALKING ABOUT IT BECAUSE I CAN'T PROVE YOU WRONG
It's possible you are just extremely annoying.
WHO FRICKING CARES IF I'M ANNOYING THAT SOUNDS LIKE A YOU PROBLEM
I can't judge how ironic you're being because I have no idea who this b***h is.
She's the UberKaren. She demands to speak to your manager or she'll burn you to death/dronestrike you.
Found the white woman
Ok, thanks for playing
>it's unrealistic that this character is a space pirate with a talking dog for a friend
>it is very realistic that Ryan Gosling (who is literally me) is playing a silent astronaut in the near future of 2070 working on a space station alone but then there's a hot chick and he bazongas her in space- what was the question?
Personally I love the slanted idea of what's realistic fiction and what's 'for children'. Some of the 'realistic' plots are just 'keanu reaves is a 50 year old man with a wife and kids but these 18 year old bawds hold him hostage and suck his dick, it was horrible'.
star was is a morality play about cops, soldiers and philosophers NOT overthrowing a corrupted government with a revolution.
palpatine accuses the jedi of trying to take over because it was the most logical and effective thing they could have possibly done at that moment to save the galaxy from tyranny.
frick OP and frick that meme
what it should have said
>sci fi marxism sold to children and dumbed down for normies
I kind of forgot what the fight was even about. Did they actually have philosophies or is it just a vague dark vs light so they can keep making shitty movies?
It was an homage to pulp scifi/fantasy/Western serials made 40 years before the first Millennial walked the Earth.
According to Lucas and everyone involved in writing the OT it is literally WWII + American Revolution. It's about American freedom fighters overthrowing the Nazi British Empire. According to Lucas and everyone involved in writing the Prequels they're literally about the Bush Family and the Iraq War officially ending democracy. It is literally a morality play about evil men overthrowing a democrat government and then setting up a corrupt tyranny that gets overthrown by plucky freedom fighters.
A better criticism of generic e-celeb #492 is that he's just ironycelling to defend Disney's garbage.
I knew art was a scam. I shouldn't be buying anime figures I should just download the pngs and print them out as small cutouts.
Now you're thinking like a billionaire.
I think it's more for money laundering or whatever the frick not actually enjoying the art.
Kind of like crypto and nft's.
Hey does anyone know how to remove watermarks from images?
that's too funny dude, just keep it as is