>duh let me pretend im moronic for the sake of journalism
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>duh let me pretend im retarded for the sake of journalism
>duh let me pretend im moronic for the sake of journalism
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>Asks a very simple question
>The left can't answer
>One of them straight up starts sobbing because he thinks the question hurts his feelings.
What is a chair?
A piece of furniture made for sitting on/in.
*blocks your path*
A stool is a chair
Not according to the English language
Yes it is. A chair is anything with four legs made to be sat on.
Couches and benches are chairs. Couches can be referred to as armchair.
Your categorisations are misguided. The stool, the couch and the bench contains the same essence, I personally call it a chair, you may call it a seat.
No it isn't. Couches and benches aren't chairs either.
That's still a piece of furniture meant for sitting on moron
trannies be like
>I wasn't molded in to something unnatural, I was born this way
dude dont waste your time with these literal gutter scum of humanity. all decent people everywhere are repulsed by them. let them live and die their pathetic existence
>trannies truly believe they can become women if they go to the sawmill and have their log sawn off and have their bones sanded down to appear more feminine
YWNBAC disgusting freak
It will never be a table.
still made of wood though
Why do trannies want to be cut into pieces?
it's their last resort
SEE?????
DEFINITIONS ARE BASED ON FUNCTION
WHAT IS A WOMAN?
IT'S THE ONLY HUMAN BEING THAT CAN SEXUALLY FUNCTION WITH A MALE HUMAN BEING. DISPROVING BOTH troonyISM AND HOMOSEXUALITY
>made for
I can sit on a cushion even if it wasn't meant for that, though.
You can sit on pretty much anything but that doesn't mean its primary "function" is a chair.
>What is a ch-ACK
Is he killing the dog, or killing the guy?
Story/sound?
My bed.
anything that identifies as a chair
I think meant whatever people say a chair is.
I was going to link the star wars wiki page for chair but they removed it wtf?
>"a separate seat for one person, typically with a back and four legs."
I see a horse. When I look at you, I see a hideously deformed man with a festering wound between his legs. It turns out that when you're not mentally ill, words can be pretty easily defined.
What is a false equivalence?
None of these posters can answer a very simple question.
Its been answered. A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman.
So a 6'5" 400lb serial rapist who claims is a woman at court should be sent to a womans prison?
So how can you identify as a woman if you can't even define what a woman is?
I did define what a woman is. Its anyone who identifies as a woman.
Okay, but that means it's a meaningless word now because a woman is indiscernible from a non-woman.
Any other words you want to make useless?
>a woman is anyone who identifies as a (anyone who identifies as a(anyone who identifies as a (anyone who identifies as a (anyone who identifies as a (...*~~))
libtards learn the meaning of circular definition challange (IMPOSSIBLE (they're all braindead))
>A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman is anyone who identifies as a woman
>circular definition
this chair is an eye sore.
>le spectrum
>le social construct
>spends countless money and hours getting surgeries to make himself have women's physical features that men are sexually attracted to
Yes, truly a social construct
This isn't a valid argument.
arguments are real arguments, chud
Is it, you can approach the problem from any direction to prove it false since it is so egregiously false, not an ounce of truth, it's not even bending the truth here, it's going directly against it.
Matter arranged in certain way that people usually call as "chair".
Well anon... what is a woman?
NTA, but a woman is an adult human female.
and what of the intersex people who align with a female identity? despite not having a vegana or XX chromosomes, these people have always been considered women, they have always competed in female olympics, they have always gone in female bathrooms. there is only a problem now because of effective propaganda inciting a new satanic panic amongst squares and other dull people.
categories and definitions are useful constructs but they are always exceptions and grey areas. its much easier to accept the fact that reality has very few hard lines than it is to try desperately to create and maintain them. entropy will come for you and your hard edges too my friend.
male/female is the hardest line in biology. you can't say it doesn't exist and say that anything in biology is true at the same time. every person who vaxxed during COVID says that male/female is binary and you're a moron.
stay focused, you didnt respond to my intersex question. how do we deal with these people socially? my answer is the same way we always have, with the way they present and identify, regardless of what invisible chromosomes say
cant define in terms of margins, but we can accept those margins as valid exceptions.
is cereal soup? is a hot dog a sandwich? we can argue all day about semantics but it all comes back to the same reality ive already posted: categories and definitions are useful constructs but there are always exceptions and grey areas.
then answer the question. how do we deal with intersex people? my traditional and conservative view is that we should treat them the same way we always have, as they ask to be, and appear to be
>how do we deal with intersex people?
intersex people are mistakes, if you have a wiener and a vag, you can honestly do whatever the frick you want.
And that doesn't mean they are actually a man or a woman, you just play pretend with them. Exactly like a troony. No one actually thinks a trans woman is a woman.
>cant define in terms of margins, but we can accept those margins as valid exceptions.
the key word here being exception, which prove the rule
>how do we deal with intersex people?
differently, unlike troons, intersex people are a literal mixed bag. Troons are not intersex people, they/them are sick people with a defined sex
>we can argue all day about semantics
nah. you will never be a woman.
You don't define terms on the margins. Intersex is a birth defect, it is by definition an outlier.
I guess we can't say humans have two arms and two legs because sometimes people are born without them, or have them amputated.
>who align with a female identity
this isn't a real thing
A human bean born with a vegana or XX chromosomes.
It used to be "adult human female".
Now it's "whatever you want it to be".
What's a female?
see
Why are incels so obsessed with trans people? Maybe if they spent as many hours at the gym they wouldn't be fat virgins LOl
someone post the right wingers are more likely to be fit article
post bench
Why are the left so intent on making everyone believe that 2+2=5?
It's part of the illusory truth effect, repeat something enough times and people start to believe it. The goal isn't to make people believe this random thing, but to break down someones desire to align with facts/the truth
The israelites will be able to say that they love their children more than others even though they strap them in sacrifice altars and mutilate then suck their bloodied baby penis.
Why are trans people so adamant on forcing others to actively participate in their fantasy?
They're the ones at war with reality, not me.
>asks a very simple question for 5 months
>puts together a supercut of some of the most convoluted answers
>hurr the left is stupid
So you think you got a good answer?
What is a woman?
>he just cherry picked leftists who can't answer the question
so find me a single leftist who can answer the question.
Destiny
I don't know anything about him. is he pro trans? and what's his answer?
What is woke?
non sleep
Currently 'woke' describes a semi-religious movement whose main motivation is to dismantle western civilization internally. Someone who is 'woke' is acting in concert with this ideology
A brainwashed delusional useful idiot, used to destroy to then have the power behind them consolidate their power. Mainly formed in universities which have been captured, targeting weak and resentful individuals, they were first deployed to protect Wall Street during the Occupy Wall Street protests in the early 2010s with success but they were not fully developed as proven with their failure during the Gamergate grassroot rising, this incident proved to be a catastrophe for this project since it ended up immunizing people to the "woke", making them recognize it in an instant and engage in a "search and destroy" response just like the immune system.
Umbrella term for a set of progressive ideas, most noteworthy:
>intersectionality (formerly "intersectional feminism")
>critical race theory
>genderism
>anti-colonialism
>socialism
When a blue county has more money and resources than an entire red state, but insist that their region is only doing poorly because a red state thousands of miles away isn't voting like them
like when the USSR collapsed, one of the copes was that communism won't work until ALL the countries become like the USSR
He was answered by everyone. He just edited those parts out.
>this homosexual
>journalism
>Gets TN to outlaw child troonification
>noooooo that's not a real journalisming!!1
A woman is me
It was made in bad faith. He didn’t let them truly answer.
One of them tried to give an answer and he literally cut it up into an unintelligible cringe montage because it was “too long” and then said “duurrrr try again freako but this time use less words”
Not excusing troons — but that is complete bullshit
You are tasked with writing the definitions for the latest edition of the dictionary. You come to "woman". What do you write? It has to be concise, accurate and meaningful.
homie who the frick cares. Its not a big deal. To push that shit in people face and be like ”duuuuh what is a woman hahahaha you dont know that means trannies arent valid lolololol” is just gay cringe.
Man it's like I'm watching the film again. Dude asks what is a woman, you're incapable of answering.
Have sex chuds
>homie who the frick cares.
Anyone with any kind of intelligence or integrity. Words and their definitions matter, they communicate information and ideas, without them communication is pointless and we're animals.
if you cared about intelligence and integrity, you wouldn't look up to right wing grifters who made a career out of trashing green college students in debates
>right wing grifters
you cant grift facts and logic
I bet you support Israel huh
You're right, let's wait after they castrate every single white kid before speaking out against it. It's the honorubu thing to do.
>because words matter
Oh God please do not use the fricking Jordan Peterson / Sargon of Akkad bullshit arguments here.
Just say men dressing as women is disgusting and deranged. You are anonymous you don’t have to make the politically correct talking points.
Just because you call an argument bullshit doesn't devalue it you know? Yes words matter that's why the left is so obsessed about changing their definitions all the time.
Why? Because you want a simple reason to dismiss anyone who rebutes your bullshit?
You are moronic as shit for not being able to answer something so simple
lmfao the only gay cringe here is you, pal
He wasn’t asking merriam webster. He was making an entire film on the topic. He doesn’t have time to go in depth and listen for two minutes? Seems dishonest
Frick how much time do you need? A female adult human, if you want to get biological it's anyone without a y Chromosome.
There, why can't the left give an answer like that? Why do they need more time to get to the point of what they think that word means? Maybe because you are pathetic and worried stepping on the toes of people that literally have an aversion to reality?
So people with Swyer syndrome who have veganas and XY chromosomes should be arrested if they use the women's bathroom?
No those can go. Normal healthy males can't.
Why? People with Swyer syndrome are not female according to you.
They aren't.
So then they should be banned from using female bathrooms.
Why? Healthy adult males should. People with gene or birth defects are a valid exception to the rule. You really aren't making any good arguments attempting to instrumentalize those people, they aren't related to whats being talked about.
So a person with a penis and Klinefelter syndrome should be allowed to use the women's bathroom?
Nah
>But but but what about the 0.0001% of genetic freaks bet you didn't think about them!
The law needs to apply to everyone. You can't say "ok well this law makes it ambiguous as to whether going to the bathroom in public is legal or illegal for these few hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of people so we just will deal with that on a case by case basis". People need to know what sex they legally are. If you want to make sex-based legislation, you need to account for every single individual freak condition.
Homie it's ez. If you have a Y chromosome, you're legally a man. Ezpz
So people with Swyer syndrome, who are born with veganas, are legally required to use the men's restroom. Thank you.
You don't have any syndrome you are just a dude who's dick gets hard when he imagines himself as a pretty anime girl.
If letting 1 in 80,000 freaks into the men's washroom stops troons from going into the women's washroom, it's a price I'm willing to pay
notice how these people have *syndromes*, meaning something is out of the ordinary and wrong. you defeated your own argument
Frick off freak. You will never be a woman, no matter what the law or anything else says.
>B-but what about people with Blah Blah Condition???
Don't care. I literally don't care. Frick both of you.
I'm a man (male (penis)). I'm just logically consistent with my views.
I'll exploit anyone I want. I'm a left-chud.
You aren't "letting" them use it. You're forcing girls born with veganas to use the men's room.
>I'm just logically consistent with my views.
If your presuppositions are wrong your entire system of logic is wrong. There's no use in consistency if the entire premise is stultified by some thought-terminating pattern in your mind.
Lolno you don't since the exceptions are so fricking rare you can perfectly decide on case by case.
We start with "no dudes in the ladies room" and if you think you have a case that you aren't a dude that doesn't start with "I identify as" then we can talk about it.
That's life and we are human. There rarely are clear cut situations that don't require a second look every now and then but as far as gender goes things are rather on the "pretty obvious if you arent a moronic leftist freakshow" side.
Intersex are men or women with anatomy issues. They may face their own legal issues, but that shouldn't be further complicated by trannies trying to exploit them for their own selfish gain.
Trannies are men or women who want to pretend they are the other sex.
Please, anon. Stop exploiting marginalized people.
Intersex isn't trans. Trannies exploit people with intersex conditions to attempt to backdoor themselves into some form of legitimacy. It's sick they use people with legitimate medical conditions as an attempt to garner public approval.
STOP using intersex people to promote your trans ideology, unless you're a bad person. You're not a bad person, are you, anon?
Just build these good old shit n piss boxes.
SIRS
THIS IS AGAINST OUR HUMAN RIGHTS BLOODY BENCHOD b***h I RAPE YOUR SISTER
Because they disagree.
Academia in the left has split the definitions of woman and female for utilitarian purposes. As female encompasses people assigned female at birth and possessing XX chromosomes while woman encompasses the internalized social gender roles and expectations.
They are saying that the social role of women is no longer exclusive to those possessing a female biology.
This film doesn’t argue against the merit of that argument. Not really. They just try to make a mockery of the blue hairs and go for the lowest hanging “gotcha” lines that their producers have gathered.
If we’re at this huge fricking societal crossroad lets at least have real, good faith arguments on the topic. Which some people are doing. But israelite worshippers like Walsh definitely aren’t.
Just because you seethe about "israelites" doesn't make you any less cringe troony.
I don't care what leftist academia says and I won't discuss any definitions those nutjobs pull out their ass. There is no "woman" without "female", the idea to construct some "identity" based on gender norms and pretending that's the same as being born female is absurd and nonsensical to a degree where I would think it's all an elaborate troll but you homosexuals ACTUALLY FALL FOR THIS SHIT even though it results in a hollow definition that encompasses nothing. "Feeling like something" means jack shit, you can't define feelings.
Those gender roles and expectations are downstream from female biology though, what trans people are trying to do is hijack this 'gender role' when it is incongruent with their underlying biology - hence the backlash against it. When you force people to deny reality then you have this type of backlash, especially when those societies have underlying liberal, truth-seeking/scentific dispositions.
This societal crossroad isn't so much about transgenderism itself (almost everyone has a 'live and let live' philosophy), it's a fight between post-truth dogmatism and enlightenment evidence-based worldview stances. Or even more deeply, it's a battle between liberalism and wokeism, aka illiberal liberalism
Why should it take two minutes to read a definition?
That would basically be an entire page worth of definition for just one word.
"adult human female"
What is a female?
And also
What is an adult?
>libtards don't know what a female or an adult is
Lmfaoooo
But do you? Or are you also infected with the woke virus?
>female
The biological sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs, distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova) that can be fertilized by male gametes.
>adult
A person who is fully grown or developed.
So a
So a woman born without a uterus or the ability to bear offspring isn't a female?
anon forgot a segment : "potentially" or "in principle"
I think you mean the ovaries.
Your example would be a female with a disorder that prevents her from expressing her genetic blueprint and fulfill her biological roll.
I'm sure they'd appreciate hearing that
don't hate the player, hate the game
Their feelings on the matter have no relevance to the question at hand.
I do not appreciate reading your moronic comments, will you stop posting forever to make me feel better? If not, why not?
i wouldn't say it to them because im not rude, but that doesn't make it any less true
not him but that means there's something biologically wrong with the female and outside the norm. she's not a fully functional female, in that sense
Women are generally born with the ability to bare children. You don't base definitions off anomalies.
But the ones that aren't, are you saying they're not women?
No one is saying that, you obtuse c**t.
They're still women you moron.
Humans generally have two arms and legs, but one born without a limb is still a human.
No, it means that there's something wrong with her.
Some cars can't drive so horses can be cars
This makes sense if you are a mentally ill libtard like you
The one that aren't appear as a result of a genetic error. Similar circumstance to things like Down's syndrome (less severe than downs, obviously), cystic fibrosis, etc. Their genome has the blueprint for a functional female reproductive system, but an error in the code prevented it from developing properly. So; they are women with a genetic error
>But people who are born without some limb that the rest 99%+ do have, aren't they human?
If a woman is infertile, as in for example, precisely she has too narrow fallopian tubes for the eggs to go through to accomplish the process, since we see female organs, fallopian tubes for example, this necessarily means that she is a female logically, even though she is sterile. In the same sense, if you see a car without wheels, it can't "carry" people, since it can't roll, but it's still a car, it has an interior where people can rest in, it has an engine, it has a driving mechanism, it's just missing wheels.
In contrast, a rock is not a car, it has nothing a car has, in the same way, a male is not female, not only it has its own distinct organs but also missing all the female organs.
No, because her biological sex is still evident in her chromosomes, her genetic map, as
puts it. What you've described is a female who is *incidentally* incapable of bearing children, not *intrinsically*. She is still of the sex that produces the larger gamete.
The whole gender ideology as part of the Pride movement is really weird and backward when you stop to think about it. We had decades of, "If you want to wear dresses and have sex with men, you're still a man", and now we still maintain that but it's also, "You're really a woman because you're more comfortable wearing a dress".
What is a woman?
his wife gives a one-sentence definition at the end that satisfies biology and reality
cry more
He had a good run there until he went on Rogan and turned out to be just another moronic bible thumper
DRINK
FIVE HOUR ENERGY
>YWNBAW
You can't pretend to be moronic, you just are. Anyone from here knows this.
>everyone involved said that he tricked them by saying he was "on their side"
wtf does that even means?
like, if he had been told them he was a chud they would have changed their answers or something?
Die hard Israel firster. One of the Ben Shapiro gatekeepers.
Lots of troons with anger issues in this thread. Seek therapy.
Lots of small penised white incels in here. No wonder all of you are killing yourselves lol
What is a pedophile?
A person who is attracted to children below the age of 12.
what? all children? do they find every single human below 12 attractive? and then magically once they tick over 12 years their attraction disappears?
is it just me or is the left losing influence?
ITT: trannies having a melty
>western society can't even say what a woman is anymore
>make up shit like "menstruating bodies" hoping to not offend anyone (but they do) and just tie themselves into knots more and more
>nooo the one moronic is the journalist questioning it!
The absolute state.
Post times you acted like matt walsh.
>be me
>at restaurant
>order soup
>get soup
>stop waitress
>”scuse me miss, but is this really soup?”
>she looks puzzled and answers ”y-yes?”
>i snicker, smile and ask ”but what IS soup?”
>oh my the expression on her face!
>order soup
>get pork ribs instead
Oy vey
A soup is that which is identified as a soup.
>*Serves you a salad*
this doesnt work because soup is well defined, and nobody is trying to redefine soup for the sake of feelings, nor censor people criticizing so
In this shitty economy, shady restaurants are definitely trying to pass off broth as soup.
>slurp/slorp
hey this post violates global rule “racism outside of /b/“!!!!!!!!!!
not cool you genetically subhuman sub 105 IQ Black person jigaboo!
Transphobic incels like you are dying out like white "people" 🙂
great bait now go watch more gooner videos in your chastity cage goyim
this post is harrowing and PROOF that if you respect empathy, you should be a right winger
Trannies are not "valid." There is no such thing as a "trans" person. There are only people who are the biological sex they are born as, who are suffering a mental delusion and have possibly engaged in chemical/surgical self-mutilation. A "trans" "vegana" is a mutilated penis and will never be anything else. This is the truth.
>duh let me pretend im moronic for the sake of journalism
Do you enjoy having autism?
Do you?
>durr everyone must pretend they are moronic now for the sake of society
Black men are a step lower on the evolutionary ladder. They genetically have lower intelligence. That is why they have been completely exploited for centuries.
Any empowerment you feel as a nigher was granted to you by israelites trying to subvert white people. It was a gift. Your freedom was a gift. You never accomplished anything by yourselves.
they weren't pretending liberals actually think you can change your gender
That's just Louie Theroux's bit.
why is he asking such a stupid question?
Who even started the "pretend to be moron just asking some questions and make a biased documentary starring yourself" school of "journalism?" Was it picrel?
>asking questions bad
Why are you afraid of them?
No just the bad faith "duhhhhhh I'm just a harmless moron and not trying to deceive you or hide my agenda with a mask of feigned cluelessness or anything, why come *insert leading and manipulative line of questioning here*???? His answer may SHOCK you" technique
I just watched this troony mansplain masculinity to me and deboonk gender for an hour while immensely coping with the fact she injected testosterone to conform to socially constructed standards of masculinity.
They really need help bros.
Oh my god
>why don't men follow our movement!!!
>anyway men need to le cry more and le become more like wholesome women :*~~)
They cannot market themselves.
If you ever watch one of those LGHDTV gatherings or abortion protests then it's blatantly obvious that leftoids are deeply broken and sad individuals who are usually physically repulsive as well. Their entire ideology is just their method of coping with being losers in the game of life. A man doesn't chop his wiener off and start putting on women's clothes because he's happy with himself. Same with women who kill their own babies before they're even born.
>see on TV that Roe V Wade is cancelled
>"oh no"
>immediately look at my daughter, hug her thinking her right to decapitate her children, my grandchildren is attacked
>go outside, women crying, their choice denied
>go to hospital, people looking at the TVs announcing the news, this is our 9/11
>our state still allow baby murder though but if our women can kill their children, women of other states should too! This brings me to tears.
I wonder if she would tell women who had mastectomies or alopecia that their suffering is the result of the patriarchy enforcing outdated gender constructs and they are basically dumb morons for believing it.
For these people whatever hurt a man feels is their own fault for even having a conceptualization of what a man is. It's the most perverse version of the fox who lost its tail.
MOMENT OF ATTENTION PLEASE
https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1714279937279160596
Rowling is still a homosexual, she supports every leftist talking point besides trans stuff.
>le answer was edited
okay then type it here right now you fricking Black person. surely it doesn't take more than a couple of sentences to answer
troonys and Crossdressers are not the same.
They are the same, as a matter of fact, "transsexuals" don't exist, only transvestites do, it is possible to wear the clothes of the opposite sex, it is impossible to transition to the opposite sex, they are all just wearing the clothes of the opposite sex and some chopped off their body part/took irreversible damage from hormone therapy.
>triggered by watching lefties melt down being unable to explain their ideological fallacies
lol
why does such a simple question cause leftychuds to have a meltdown?
Cognitive dissonance. The entire leftist ideology is built on lies because the truth causes them distress. It's literally as simple as that. When all those lies add up it causes meltdowns whenever reality interjects.
Why are there so many trans speedrunners?
>duh let me pretend im moronic for the sake of journalism
The libtards whom he interviewed looked rerarded and they weren't even pretending
Men are men and women are women, simple as
What makes a man?
someone makes a parody of what is a man and see how fast they get trigger by it Kek
Adult human male
>above 70 IQ person: "humans are a bipedal species."
>leftoids: "HMMM BUT WHAT ABOUT PEOPLE WHO ARE BORN WITHOUT LEGS HMMM?"
when will you get tired of embarrassing yourself?
all leftoid arguments are inherently disingenuous because deep down they know that anyone with an IQ above 90 and a shred of life experience can understand what fricking morons they are, and so they have to play dumb, redefine words, use SAgoon brand le detached irony, etc.
It's also why they fall back on appeals to authority every time
>I'm not a biologist
They are disingenuous because they think it's for the greater good. They see short term benefit in obscuring the truth and perverting the language itself. And they do not consider that it will make us worse at thinking and problem solving in the future if we cannot even define basic words anymore or redefine words so often that they become meaningless just to defeat some ideological great evil.
It's like those chinese communists who melted down all their iron tools during "The Great Leap Forward" in a foolish attempt to make steel, only to end up with a major famine because it turned all their farming tools to slag. I am sure they also felt great while doing so.
Ok except it's not the greater good in the first place, it's not even a little good. They're fighting for child mutilation, sterilization, and molestation
Yeah, but it feels good to fight for the "oppressed" and to shout at the "oppressors". You can build a whole identity around it. Even if it is a manufactured struggle.
Reminds me of the star wars sequels where they're still calling themselves the resistance but if you actually think about it the First Order are the ones rebelling now
Misery loves company, so making future generations of kids miserable is a good thing in the eyes of miserable leftoids.
chatgpt:
A woman is an adult human female. In terms of biology, women typically have two X chromosomes and are capable of giving birth and breastfeeding. However, it's important to note that gender identity is not solely determined by biological factors. Gender identity is a deeply personal and individual experience, and some individuals may identify as women regardless of their biological sex. Gender is a complex and multifaceted concept that encompasses a range of identities and expressions.
>Gender identity is a deeply personal and individual experience, and some individuals may identify as women regardless of their biological sex. Gender is a complex and multifaceted concept that encompasses a range of identities and expressions.
They can't admit to themselves that "gender identity" is essentially just a set of stereotypes so they muddy the waters with this nonsense.
Gender identity doesn't exist because gender doesn't exist. Self-perception is not complex, if your perception does not align with reality then you are wrong which might produce self-harm, for example, thinking that you can jump off from the 3rd story while you can't, hurting your own legs in the process. It's not complex or multifaceted.
Wow, is this really the best /misc/-rejects have to offer? Jumping from heights that are physically proven to cause harm is NOT the fricking same as gender identity. You can identify as a man/women/gender fluid individual. You cannot endure a fall from the 3rd story of a building without some kind of physical damage. Unreal that I'm even engaging with a frickwit like you.
Chopping off your penis is proven to cause irreversible harm, same as chopping off any other body parts and still less insane than trying to do a reckless physical feat, we can heal broken legs.
>gender fluid
kys my man
identifying as someone who can make children with a uterus is the same as identifying as someone who can endure three story drops
no, he's right albeit his form is a little rough. wether or not someone identifies as a woman does nothing to change the fact that they are/aren't a woman, just like claiming that you can survive a large drop on your head doesn't change the fact that you're perception of reality and reality itself are misaligned.
What would you call amputating or mutilating healthy body parts to align with a nebulous "gender identity", if not physical damage?
>You can identify as a man/women/gender fluid individual.
you can identify as whatever the frick you want but people will still see you for what you are, and when they see that you insist on pretending to be something you're not they will think you're deranged. this is unavoidable, even libs that parrot all the troony activism talking points know it, even in their heads it's not "i'm looking at a woman" but "i'm looking at someone that it's my duty to pretend is a woman in order to be a good person."
there's no fundamental difference between seeing a troony on the bus and seeing a guy wear the jacket from drive. it's just intuitively embarrassing to look at people pretending to be something they're not. you can make it forbidden to mention this out loud, but the feelings will remain.
Having the personality of Drive can get you laid.
I identify as a bird and what you just said is VERY harmful and violence
>You can identify as a man/women/gender fluid individual.
That is correct. but, you cannot force me to play pretend with you.
>gender fluid
the frick even is that?
it means a girl with short hair or a guy with long hair
Humans tend to have different senses of perception and reality, though. There isn't one true reality that all humans adhere to.
How very foucault of you
You are changing the subject fricker, how unscientific method of you. The truth is when there is a correspondence with the mind and reality, it's not reality that adapts, it's your mind that is supposed to match reality, when that correspondence occurs in our mind, that's called the truth.
How do we verify what matches with reality, however?
>how can you trust the evidence of your eyes and ears?
Makes sense that would be the leftist argument, 1984 is their playbook
scientific method, research
>We're the experts on what a woman is, okay? Even though we've never even touched one.
what is a woman?
found the original
Many /misc/tards are secretly trannies, so yeah.
>Having ovaries, a uterus, and two X chromosomes doesn't make you a woman
>A wig, a dress, and some makeup does make you a woman
The Left, everyone.
Trannies often believe insane conspiracy theories so that makes sense
The implication that you need to be an expert to identify what a woman is in itself an insane premise
They don't know appealing to authority is a fallacy. It's their fallback every time.
I loved it when some senate clown asked Matt Walsh where he got his education to "qualify" him to criticize sex change surgeries for children and he says something like
>well I went to school long enough to learn to read, so i am able to read their documents they put out about the procedures. I'm also a human being with a soul and common sense, so I'm able to tell mutilating children is bad
>huh let me pretend very one in society is a sex freak like me so that I don't feel bad about myself
>manipulate data
>cover shit for pedophiles, nazis and satanists
>make ~le social revolution
Now everyone is living this lie. Haha, very funny, Kinsey.
>op calls others moronic
>op believes there are infinite genders, diversity is our strength, and that black lives matter
You are a tool. Nothing more, nothing less. Good job being useful to somebody for once in your life.
>what is a woman
not actually that important
>should homosexual communists be able to destroy your life for holding a common sense opinion on the question
actually the issue here
>trannies are still fuming over a basic question that they still can't give an actual genuine answer to
Walsh won.
>pretend im moronic for the sake of journalism
you rang
>what is the socratic method?
The point was to show the absurdity and hypocrisy of left wing psychos trying to warp reality by having them with their own words show how silly they are.
Simple fricking questions don't require a bunch of mental gymnastics and word salad.
Despite that he's still a israelite ring kissing moron.
The success of the movie went to his head and he start spouting the most stupid shit making himself look like a complete butthole.
The fact that detransitioners exist proves it's all nonsense fetish play
Preying on impressionable, malleable, angry or lost children is as old as time but never has it come to this kind of mass manipulation.
Well now he doesn't look like a man either lol
Woman is an adult female human. Unfortunately for Matt Walsh, trans women are also adults, females, and humans.
>females
That Y chromosome begs to differ.
What is a female?
>trans women are females
>Unfortunately for Matt Walsh, trans women are also adults, females, and humans.
King David hotel bombing. Search for it on Yandex. Israel is an illegitimate apartheid state that operates open air prisons in Gaza for millions of indigenous people they consider subhuman. The war crimes of the state of Israel are well documented yet taboo for western audiences due to the societal foundation of the west in holocaust mythology.
The displaced Palestinians are destined for Europe. This is an intentional act to destroy the high trust homogeneous society that israelites view as an existential threat to their way of life. Complete domination of lesser people.
gaygiest chud cope.
>troons projecting they/them's cope
Pure homophobia coming from the trans crowd, what a surprise
>chud
I don't understand these people. Don't they know if they'd be killed too by the third worlders?
>White leftist cuckolds knowing what's best for them
White leftists literally hate themselves and their race.
KINO
and we will use no name at all when we bury you
big "man" behind a computer
hahahaha feels good to know we got you freaks scared. the worms cant wait to rot you, and we cant wait to make it happen.
Very secure thing to post in response to light ribbing
>you freaks
ywnbaw
are you ready for your testicular exam, ma'am?
t. you
>they STILL can't answer it
everybody knows the answer to that title
LGBTQIA2SBBQ people can't answer it without admitting their troony pets aren't actually women.
Not reading this thread: nobody except extremely online neurotic outcasts see transsexuals as real women.
If you for even a second think vast society is on the side of “trans people” you have brainworms induced by discord isolation