Enterprise

Was it really as bad as they say?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was closest thing to TOS in terms of raw basedness.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It was superior to TOS in many respects. Especially when it comes to horniness.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >a man and his dog
          >half-naked women
          Basedest Trek ever.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It's pathetic that all NuTrek are M-rated and they don't have the balls to do something like that.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Magnify, Mr. Sulu.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                sniff

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Her fake breasts are actually decent compared to most.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                How did they get away with it?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                hhnnnggg

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Does the Enterprise have such hard water that the shower heads start getting chalky?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Tripp is the best character in Trek. Based 22nd century Florida man.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I didn't know that the Teletubbies were on ENT...

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I sort of wish they did more weird stuff like that in Enterprise. Also, that clip is very Farscape-esque.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Also, that clip is very Farscape-esque.
            Yep. That scene did feel somewhat Australian.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I like T’Pol’s fake booba.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I like Porthos.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >le heckin pupper
        ENT was the first NuTrek.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Didn't Data sing a song to a cat?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Cats are based. Dogs are Reddit-tier.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              dammit Lovecraft you're supposed to be dead.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Say his name.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I’ve never understood this cat vs dog, can’t a guy like both?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I have two dogs, my kids have two cats. I like them both. All of them think sleeping on the bed with me is the best shit in the world for some reason. The dogs go ape shit when I get a shotgun out cause that means innawoods hunting time, cats love that fricking laser pointer the hexagon window in the kitchen with lots of sun.
                Pets are great, anyone who doesn't like animals is immediately sus

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You're alright, Anon.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                probably the most based post on the board right now

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >Data sing a song to a cat

            “Felis Catus” is your taxonomic nomenclature:
            An endothermic quadruped, carnivorous by nature.
            Your visual, olfactory, and auditory senses
            Contribute to your hunting skills and natural defenses.

            I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations,
            A singular development of cat communications
            That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection
            For rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.

            A tail is quite essential for your acrobatic talents:
            You would not be so agile if you lacked its counterbalance;
            And when not being utilized to aid in locomotion,
            It often serves to illustrate the state of your emotion.

            Oh Spot, the complex levels of behavior you display,
            Connote a fairly well-developed cognitive array;
            And though you are not sentient, Spot, and do not comprehend,
            I nonetheless consider you a true and valued friend.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Toaster poetry.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >And though you are not sentient, Spot
              But Spot was sentient, she just wouldn't be considered sapient.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          DS9 was the first NuTrek.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            It was always TNG. TNG is actually the worst Trek and the movies prove it.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              the movies were shit because stewart kept thinking he was supposed to be an action hero.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Patrick Stewart is a terrible actor and the only reason he got a pass was his diction.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >its another porthos eats cheese joke

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Post it.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I like T’Pol’s fake booba.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Is there proof they were fake?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Vulcan breasts are naturally perky.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          vulcan boob muscles and tendons are used to a much higher gravity than us earthlings. would make sense vulcan boobs are perkier in just 1G

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        you could easily crack a fricking egg on those things
        in a TOS uniform they were heaven though

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        agree

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Was it really as bad as they say?
    no, it was kino

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I liked it as a kid, but I'd only ever seen Voyager.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      VOY is great and I’m tired of pretending otherwise.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >first female captain
        >is a psycho
        Explain.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          It’s kino (and also realistic)

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >first female captain
          >is a psycho
          Is that a bad thing?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Not at all.

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Is this the /trek/ thread? Cartroon editions should be illegal.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty much yes. troony janny deleted a thread with more posts and posters.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Damning.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, take that lefty troony shitshow elsewhere. This is a thread about Enterprise.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Has some of the best one off's in ST. Carbon Creek is kino af.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Deserved seven seasons.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It’s a crime it got cancelled just when it started to get good.

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Yes.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    only if you don't have faith of the heart

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >thinly veiled 9/11 metaphor

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Star Trek was always political.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        nah. Discussing philosophy and ethics is not political unlessw you make it so.
        Particularly, ST was never woke

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >ST was never woke
          b-b-but there was a brief, non-sexual interracial kiss once in the 1960's! That means you have to accept every other character is gay and everybody has early 21st century progressive political views that definitely will never go out of style

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Posting in this thread while holding my kitten.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Comfy.

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No. But I remember autists hating everything about it, there was one argument on the imdb forums about how baseball caps should be considered archaic by the 2150's.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The NASA-esque aesthetic is what makes it great.

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Archer should have fricked T'Pol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Mmm, Vulcan hatefricking

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it's a goddamn masterpiece compared to the slop that Star Trek is now. When it came out it was seen as just okay and became pretty good as it went along.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It's cancellation was tragic.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        it probably ended at the right time. Not sure what else they could have done story-wise and the ratings tanked by the last season

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The ratings were pretty consistent, just low. Then when viacom got split up, no one wanted to try to figure out who got production rights, as doing so would’ve been pointless anyway, as a show changing networks/timeslots always takes a sizable ratings hit.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's unironically the 2nd best Trek behind DS9, it's not even close.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No, it was worse.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Cringe, dude. Delete your post.

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    TNG > DS9 > TOS > Enterprise > Voyager
    I don't consider the other shows canon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What other shows?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      TOS > TNG > DS9

      I'll watch Voyager and Enterprise someday.

  17. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >/trek/ has another homosexual cartoon OP
    cringe

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Tell me about it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That’s what you get for letting /trek/ die. They’re sneaky hyenas.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The sad thing is the cartoon is the first watchable Trek property since OP

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I refuse to watch

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I don't blame you but the most recent episode brought back some of the DS9 cast and it's just entirely in good humour, joking like an insider rather than attacking and mocking nerds. It has a warm feeling.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            don't care, still not watching

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you, the nutrek shill, never seem to understand that there’s more to Star Trek than “h-hey remember th-this??”

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              I don't post in /trek/, it became a cesspit years ago. I watch an episode of old Trek every night so I'm never out of touch with what Star Trek is. It's obviously not DS9 or anything but it's fun and the characters are good and develop. It's a comedy, were you expecting Citizen Kane?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                methinks the “lady” doth protest too much

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >It's a comedy, were you expecting Citizen Kane?
                he was probably expecting Star Trek

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                From a cartoon comedy? That's pretty moronic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >shows has been labelled Star Trek
                >b-but it's a cartoon!!

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I'm glad you get it

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You’re defending a shitty cartoon that betrays its branding.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                From a cartoon comedy? That's pretty moronic.

                I'm glad you get it

                >LD troon out of its containment general
                filtered

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Except it's not watchable and it's not Star Trek

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >that poster count
      They have no shame

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >16 posters (me included)
        >100 posters
        Truly shameless.

  18. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What do we have here?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Enjoy being banned for false reports, this isn't a /general/ and cartoon posts don't belong on Cinemaphile they belong on Wrong board. Keep staying mad that this thread is more popular than your troon general.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        troony janny deleted a non-troon thread even though it had more posters and posts. It’s ogre

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Enjoy being banned for false reports
        You have to go back.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I was here before you newbie, mods ban you if you false report.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            You have to go back.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              You have to go back, I've been here since 2008 and I know what I'm talking about. Just because you haven't experienced getting banned for false reports, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You have to go back.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Bot, filtered.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You have to go back.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >dude I’ve been here SO LONG man, but I for some reason don’t know that Cinemaphile moderation is random, inept, and meaningless

                it really is true. you never stop being a newbie.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No shit the moderation is random and inept, but if you've been here long enough you will eventually get banned for something you usually don't get banned for. I was talking to someone who said it's never happened to them, or maybe you didn't know that because you're fricking moronic.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                the main takeaway is you really just shouldn't care what the mods do, at all, beyond making fun of them of course. though the other newbie is likely lying about never being banned.

  19. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >already down to meta posts and crying about what Star Trek is not
    You're not here to post about Enterprise at all...

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I'm mad my boy Porthos never got a love interest.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Beagles have only one passion in life: food

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Cheese.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            and barking for more cheese

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              And sleeping.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                And dreaming about cheese.

  20. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Seeing archer going fresh faced and optimistic into the unknown but slowly losing his sanity over the seasons as the setbacks and crazy dangers mount up was the highlight for me. The man can't catch a break.

    Also he had way better chemistry with tpol than the lieutenant although i can kinda understand why they ultimately didn' develop that further

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >i can kinda understand why they ultimately didn' develop that further

      Black the first episode establishes that they’re partially mindmelded, so plastic b***h going for another guy is low key establishment that archer is gay.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      TOS was written by men who had served in actual combat and an actor who could actually act the role of a competent leader
      ENT was the network trying to crawl back to those TOS days, so while Archer had chemistry with T'Pol, no commander worth the rank would ever frick someone under his command. That is a major nono. And Archer did it well, he made his calls decisively and could adapt when he made a bad call or things went sideways on him, just like Kirk.
      I know this will be heresy here, but TNG... I did not like Picard. Too wishy-washy, too much a diplomat, and the constant fricking speeches on WHO WE ARE became formulaic. Troi was emblematic of this watered-down crap, unless Roddenberry was being a sly devil and showing how complacent the Federation had become, thinking itself safe from all threats.
      I would have loved to have seen a Riker in command show, but seeing how he cucked out with the nutrek shit, I think we dodged a bullet.
      I liked DS9, even tho most don't consider it trek, it shows how hard being in command is, how you will make judgment calls that will question your ethics because victory in war is all that counts when facing an enemy that considers your defeat to be your death. Plus, someone on the writing staff understood spook shit (intel stuff) well with the Cardassian/Garak stories. In DS9's favor, it did a great job of shoving the utopianist's faces into a pile of shit, and torturing an Irishman, which is always great.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        the Enterprise crew feels the most like me and my personality, it was written in the 2000s and you can tell. None of the characters use the pseudo-lofty dialogue in the TNG era and they all kinda just sound like regular guys

        Roddenberry was still alive when TNG was airing so his influence had Picard constantly giving lofty speeches since that was Roddenberry's thing. It's not necessarily a bad thing, but it does get a bit formulaic and at times left the audience with zero debate over whether the proper thing was done because, well, Picard explained the moral of the story. TOS was like that, as well. It wasn't until he died that Star Trek could become less about ideals and more about how people with wildly different personalities react to dilemmas.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >I would have loved to have seen a Riker
        In watching TNG again, I've learned to hate Riker. His command authority is just him speaking loudly and gruffly, sometimes cutting his own captain off, just to put himself out there. He had no actual ideas of his own, and yelled at the junior officers he depended on. Beyond that, his only other real character arc was hitting on anything female, and fricking up with Troi. I think he was just a bad officer who worked his way up through knowing the right people, and knew how to put on a good show.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Riker just ends up existing to be the Watson. A character that is there to ask questions so the audience can have something explained to them. When you think about it Riker comes across as unsuited for the position with the amount of questions he ends up asking. You get people making comparisons to Riker with Kirk but, that only works if you take a particular pop culture caricature of Kirk that is not truly reflective of Kirk.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >asking questions means you're unfit for command
            oof

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The amount and type of questions Riker asks makes him come across as moronic in the setting.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                when there isn't someone to ask the obvious questions, people forget the obvious.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Riker isn't there to be a yes-man to Picard and Picard doesn't want that, either. Riker asks questions from a different perspective that Picard might not have considered. It's called dialogue.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Riker was there to make Picard feel good about his decisions. Troi was there to keep Picard in one piece, and keep Riker in line.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                We are talking about Riker challenging Picard. We are talking about Riker asking questions, be that to La Forge or Data or whoever, for things he does not know about. For example, when they come across a Dyson Sphere: Riker does not know the concept and so Picard has to explain it to him, all that is done for the benefit of the audience.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >We are talking about Riker challenging Picard.
                *We are not

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Riker isn't there to be a yes-man to Picard
                Too bad Chakotay was exactly this to Janeway 99% of the time, fricking irritating.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                There were multiple times Chakotay argued with Janeway, there was even a time she confined him to quarters.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                The only time he stuck out is in Equinox and Scorpion.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Janeway was a shit captain. Chakotay never told her to gfh enough. And without a starfleet around, being confined to quarters shouldn't have been enforced.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >A character that is there to ask questions
            He asked questions because it was beyond his ability to understand anything, and he had to look like he understood everything. He even promoted LCDR Shelby instead of Worf and Data, both of whom knew more than him, and saved his ass on multiple occasions. That episode was proof of how bad management gets promoted... which is also how Riker got promoted.

  21. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  22. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A lot of people argue that they should never have done a prequel, yet really a Star Trek prequel made sense at that point when you consider:
    >TNG
    About 2 decades have gone by since TOS and you want to bring Star Trek back. You are doing stuff with the TOS characters in film and so you avoid that era. Perhaps more than that, you also want to introduce new aesthetics, in-universe technology and factions. So the obvious solution is to jump forward, say 100-something years, with a sequel.
    >DS9
    You have been told to do another show. At this point you have already done 2 shows based on starships - 1 still having films and 1 still airing. With this in mind you shakeup the formula by setting it on a spacestation - it is the frontier exploration of TOS but on a frontier town.
    >VOY
    You are in a similar situation back when coming up with DS9. You have already had 2 spaceship shows, and by this point you have already done the shakeup of a spacestation idea. In addition to that, any show set in the TNG/DS9 era has to deal with 1) the Alpha/Beta Quadrants arguably becoming tiring, 2) DS9 ties your hands with its geopolitical storyline. To avoid this (and to avoid any issues that could come from jumping forward 20 to 100 years in respect to other projects) set the show in a different part of the galaxy, make the story not so much an exploration but an odyssey.
    >ENT
    From a creative standpoint there is not necessarily a lack of ideas but rather your hands are tied when dealing with the TNG/DS9/VOY era and beyond. Firstly, you have similar issues as pointed out in VOY (time period becoming tiring, storyline); secondly; if you jump forward 100 years that may limit what you can do in whatever Riker or Worf or DS9 sequel you may want to do after this project. You have also already shaken things up with the spacestation idea, and the different part of the galaxy idea. So if you cannot stay in the same era and you cannot jump forward where does that leave you? Prequel.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The biggest problem with enterprise is how they baked in massive amounts of invulnerable plot armor. First by making it a prequel, then naming the ship “enterprise” (which wasn’t even a name of reverence in TOS), then by establishing they have time travelers cleaning up all their whoopsies.

      They could’ve made a show about how hard it was to get the federation off the ground, by having humans make hard, self-sacrificing decisions, that establish they will go above and beyond for even potential allies (read: multiple “maiden voyages” that end in disaster, but also establish humanity’s worth on the interstellar scale) but instead they decided to just remake TNG episodes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Enterprise was generally disliked for a lot of its run because it was seen as more of the same with the only noticeable difference being the characters are horny all the time. A show about the beginning of the Federation would have been interesting, but it also would have required really sticking to the lore, which writers hate doing.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          There wasn’t much lore about early federation. Which should’ve given them some freedom. Instead they just cut off their legs in desperate attempt to appeal to trekkies.

  23. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    the Enterprise crew feels the most like me and my personality, it was written in the 2000s and you can tell. None of the characters use the pseudo-lofty dialogue in the TNG era and they all kinda just sound like regular guys

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Are you a boomer?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        no I'm 22

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Leave this place while you still can.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >the enterprise crew feels more like a bunch of morons, like me

      Yes, most people saw what they were going for there

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        r00d

  24. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Name a trait.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Nondescript.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      skipped this gays episode the other day. he should've been killed off and replaced with someone that doesn't suck
      >muh freighters

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        he was clearly left over from early brainstorming about how rickety and wonky the nx-01 was going to be.

        and then they just made it a slight remix of the galaxy class and called it a day, and forgot to retool his character.

        of course they were targeting bush voters, who felt black people should be seen (as little as possible) and not heart.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        he was clearly left over from early brainstorming about how rickety and wonky the nx-01 was going to be.

        and then they just made it a slight remix of the galaxy class and called it a day, and forgot to retool his character.

        of course they were targeting bush voters, who felt black people should be seen (as little as possible) and not heart.

        If they were going to do anything they should have developed Malcolm and Hoshi more. They both had somewhat of characterisation but, they never fully developed them. Better they worked on developing partially developed characters as opposed to just making another partially developed. In the case of Reed they should have developed his friendship with Trip, and/or had episodes (even if just the B plot) that were focused around him and Hoshi.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >they never fully developed them.
          the episode where they tried to develop hoshi was quite possibly the worst episode of enterprise, short of the holodeck one. so its not surprising they didn't try to do that again.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          i think they developed them fine. hoshi didnt belong in space and reeds sense of duty kept him from getting the family he desperately wanted.
          the problem was they stretched storylines too far and people got bored. they should have been done with the xindi in season 3 and moved on to founding the federation and setting up TOS

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >astronaut/xenolinguist doesn't belong in space
            literally the dumbest shit ever written.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              she belongs in san fransisco studying all the data they collect. she sucks at space shit. she gets depressed about a slug dying and has a complete breakdown when she sees some dead aliens.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Sounds like she had the same fricked up trauma that Picard did, but no Troi to help her.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                she just doesnt belong in space. shes only there because archer was in a rush to leave and needed a linguist he was familiar with.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >sweet spot
      >boomer
      >climbing
      >not pinkskin

  25. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I miss old Star Trek.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      he better outlive Takei, for fricks sake.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous
        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Frick that's sad.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        He outlived his queen.

  26. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  27. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It's been a long road gettin' from there to here

  28. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Whilst Star Trek fatigue and creative decisions of the show itself most likely did contribute to its lack of success, a big reason why the show struggled in viewership was its airing on UPN. Poor scheduling and lack of promotion by UPN, and the wider lack of reach UPN had as a broadcaster.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >[franchise] fatigue
      Not a real concept. Seated in the idea that it’s impossible to have made something bad, it’s the audience’s fault, in fact, they’re just tired of how good everything is!

      The reality is voyager sucked, ds9’s ending sucked (and was generally built around the idea the federation had to actually suck, as the writers couldn’t figure out any other way to write it), and given the chance to make Star Trek, but actually gritty/scrappy, they chose to just rehash tng/ds9/voy scripts, except all the characters are morons under the command of Scott bakula doing his best dubya impersonation.

  29. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    A house divided against itself cannot stand.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      its why people who hate star trek can't make successful star trek shows.

  30. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >its another porthos eats cheese joke

      /trek/ hivemind strikes again.

  31. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      That doll that they used for Porthos was terrible.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It’s fine.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I seen it in person a few years ago it's rough. I also seen the grand nagus's staff and it's badly chipped after years.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Tell us stories, anon.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Thinking now, 2012 is more than a few years, it's been a decade. I was at that big convention in London in 2012, all the Captains were present, they had a load of other actors too. Met a lot of them. There was also a big display of props from the show and uniforms.

            >Memorable moments that I had include:

            >Chatting with Casey Biggs who was really cool and totally unrepentant about Damar. He signed my autograph with "For Cardassia"
            >Chatting with Mark Alaimo and us both stopping to admire a Seven of Nine Cosplayer who was fine.
            >Annoying an already exasperated Andrew Robinson with talk about his role in Stallone's Cobra, who humored me and had a laugh to himself about a sperg who could have asked anything but instead asks about a dumb Stallone movie.
            >Briefly getting a single sentence out of John Delancie who is traumatized by a constant flow of autistic bronies and looks deeply uncomfortable with each encounter.
            >Witnessing Shatner walk about like he owns the whole convention.
            >See Cirroc Lofton ignore the conventions money making scheme and go around taking free photos with attendees and just casually shooting the shit with them.
            >See JG Hertzler walk past me and see how fricking massive he is.
            >Have Avery Brookes straiten up my hoodie for the photo shoot so I look good, his photo was the best and he seemed genuinely happy to be there. Later he took to a piano and started playing jazz or something.

            It was a great weekend.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >Chatting with Casey Biggs who was really cool and totally unrepentant about Damar. He signed my autograph with "For Cardassia"
              Holy based.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I don't get the hate for that episode.
      >Meeting new civilisation
      >Different and clashing beliefs between that civilisation and Starfleet - i.e. how the aliens don't bother to check the genetic profile of Porthos (and how this makes Archer angry); and how the aliens are angry that Porthos urinated on one of their trees (and how Archer does not see the big deal).
      >Despite his anger Archer rises above it by the end, and does the bullshit ceremony in order to respect their culture and keep good relations.
      Don't get me wrong, not the greatest episode of Star Trek or even Enterprise, but, at its core it has the tenets of what makes Star Trek Stark Trek.

  32. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It was awful and the ship was absolutely hideous.

  33. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I've been banned (3 days) multiple times for it.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Haha! Sucker!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        It'll happen to you one day.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Oh, I don’t think so.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Oh, but it will, anon, it will
            And in your smug hubris, you will be unable to even cope with it. Why I expect you will unplug your router for 1 minute all to come back and post janny clean it up postings, never realizing that if you had simply not false reported for so long the situation and your overreaction would have been avoided?
            But what do I know, I am but a simple tailor.

  34. 2 years ago
    David_Stalley

    No. The Xindi arc was kino.

  35. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    no people the marketing people were stupid and said it was going to be something new and groundbreaking but it was just more star trek which disappointed people somehow

  36. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    this was when /trek/ died for me
    i thought the concept of a more astronaut pioneer time startrek would have been good but it turned out to just be unused voyager scripts and stupid stuff like "aksually picard didn't meet the borg or the ferengi first, archer did!"
    also had plenty of boring as dirt characters like trip, malcolm, travis..

    prequal anything is a mistake

  37. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe we’re better off without /trek/.

  38. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    ENT was okay but they needed to wrap up the time travel shit earlier

  39. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I didn't like the time travel plot but the xindi arc was good

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      i didnt like the time travel stuff either until i rewatched first contact. the star trek universe needed a timeline cleansing and ENT did exactly that.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No. The Xindi arc was kino.

      The Xindi arc was the Year of Hell from Voyager done decent.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        year of hell had such potential

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        My dad's favourite, I think it was a great loss to cancel it, I can't believe that this million dollar lasershow that is STD gets multiple seasons and even Picard gets 3 but this one which probably had in a season the budget of two episodes of those, gets cancelled.
        To end with a botched TNG episode, killing Trip and having T'Misc act as undecisive b***h (frick who wrote that).

        Wonder why that never got more than 2 episodes, maybe they were afraid that because of the timetravel involved it would look like too much committment for something that gets erased?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >having T'Misc act as undecisive b***h
          wdym? don't remember that, but I try to forget that episode

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            after everything they go through, they have sex and she is like "oh I just wanted to see what it was like with a human is not like I love you" (in a nutshell).
            Why?

            orville viewership was solid despite seth mcfarlane being quite possibly the worst leading man ever. imagine if they didn't hobble the show with a literal charisma vacuum and didn't need to have an inconsistent tone for fear of being slapped with copyright infringement.

            I didn't watch the whole second season and the third season, not sure if I should, I liked the idea of a light hearted optimistic crew that could find the fun in the TNG routine, but it feels they only tried that at the beginning and that Seth pushed his most famous friends in just for the first seasons.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Wonder why that never got more than 2 episodes, maybe they were afraid that because of the timetravel involved it would look like too much committment for something that gets erased?
          Voyager should have been the idea year of hell from the outset. Despite being far away from home in completely unexplored, and often hostile territory, Voyager has the same sort of cruise ship feel TNG had. For all intents and purposes Voyager basically resets each episode. Any problems, damage, loss etc. quickly forgotten. Perhaps it makes it comfy for the audience but, it is such a wasted potential for the odyssey premise.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          it would have been difficult to stretch the red/chakotay part. but i think it would have been cool if things just kept getting worse all season and the ended with the year of hell story to reset for next season. kind of a waste to put it in the middle.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Xindi Arc was kino with probably my favourite Star Trek character barring Dukat, Degra. It’s a shame he croaks but he had a nice arc before that point.
      It also stretched Archer to the limit and I think that was evident in Damage. I like how it collides with T’Pol’s own demons in that one beautiful scene when she confronts him, spergs out and Archer shows genuine concern for her, demonstrating how far they’d come.
      Frick I love ENT S3.

  40. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No. It was pretty good overall.

  41. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is actually earned unlike every Picard's blowing shit up in the movies they do....every movie.

      Enterprise was doomed to fail for several reasons:
      1. Trek fatigue: Star Trek Next Gen, with then simultaneous Deep Space Nine, with then simultaneous Voyager
      2. Scott Bakula was still too recognized from Quantum Leap, making him at that time a bad casting choice.
      3. Fans were immediately resistant to anything different that came too close to rewriting Trek history or tradition. (The show came straight out of the gate with a folk opening theme and red Klingon blood.)

      Now that enough time has passed, and now that the new shows have shamelessly fricked with canon and changed a lot of shit, people are much more receptive to Enterprise, and discovering that it was a very good show. I think if Paramount had simply given the franchise a cool-off period and then released Enterprise, it would have lasted more than four seasons and there wouldn’t have been such a long wait for the newer (albeit terribly disappointing) shows.

      Not like you can do it now, can't have monster of the week stuff, gotta have universe ending threats at every moment and short seasons and written by people who hate Star trek

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        orville viewership was solid despite seth mcfarlane being quite possibly the worst leading man ever. imagine if they didn't hobble the show with a literal charisma vacuum and didn't need to have an inconsistent tone for fear of being slapped with copyright infringement.

  42. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  43. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Quo vadis, /trek/?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      This is the secret "Actually discuss trek" thread.

  44. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It wasted both its good premises, the temporal cold war could have been interesting if time travel was actually a focus of the show and exploring the alpha quadrant pre-federation was interesting and added context for TOS. Like why everyone distrusts Vulcans and why humans were important in forming the Federation.

    Instead the time travel stuff didnt have any well established rules and was just waved around whenever the show needed a shadowy threat like twice a season. Imagine time travel to other trek eras and points in history, trying to keep the time line in order and also balancing interests, espinoage and politicing in ENT, could have been good.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >why everyone distrusts Vulcans
      they almost got there with
      >guys we're not spying on you its a monastery spying is illogical and we're super logical so of course we're not spying on you, also lying is illogical so you can totally tr- uh, archer, what are you doing that's illogical
      but then, ya know, kinda forgot about having decent writing. also humans important because they'll always call bullshit, even when its from their greatest allies.

      she just doesnt belong in space. shes only there because archer was in a rush to leave and needed a linguist he was familiar with.

      she belongs in san fransisco studying all the data they collect. she sucks at space shit. she gets depressed about a slug dying and has a complete breakdown when she sees some dead aliens.

      you can't study language without having conversations.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Like why everyone distrusts Vulcans
      I wish they would've played this up more. That's why the Federation had a hard time getting up and going. Hell, the "cooperation" on Earth could easily be blamed on them.

  45. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    When it came out I was disappointed we got a prequel. I was really interested in better and newer ship designs. I didn't like the show for years. Now I do like it though.

  46. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    'no'

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      could bang the hot af Vulcan, doesn't because he won't compromise his command authority
      willing to go to war with aliens over them disrespecting his dog
      a best friend who wore a cowboy hat and bangs Vulcan for him
      still gets to have sexy bath time with both Vulcan, the Asian chick, and his best friend, because why not?
      Outfoxes Andorian's secret agent, becomes best friends with him, go on operations together
      Single handily forms the Federation, then leaves never explains why

      Was Archer the Chad Captain all along? You goddamn well know he was

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Gigachad is real and his name is Jonathan Archer.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Picard is English, its why he always quotes Shakespeare

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >never watched TNG

  47. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    It and TNG are my two fav treks, sooooooo no

  48. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No.

  49. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    had the hots for this one

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Same, she has been the only actress to spark yellow fever in me. I would have bred an entire peninsula of HAPAs with her.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Same here. I really wish they gave her more attention on the show

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      what's that scar on her

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Same here. I really wish they gave her more attention on the show

      She's underrated for sure. The amount of pressure she was under as the sole language expert pre-universal translator is admirable.

      • 2 years ago
        Bashirfaggot

        The decontamination chamber is my favorite part of Enterprise. It's so obviously sex sells I love it. Like today SJWs wouldn't allow this shit to air.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I liked that it showed how dangerous and experimental space travel was for the early ships. Things like atmospheric contamination and the hull plating developments in the delphic expanse come to mind.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Same here. I really wish they gave her more attention on the show

      >married a white guy
      every time

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Whether from the East or the land of the free
        Every Asian woman wants the BWC

  50. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Enterprise was doomed to fail for several reasons:
    1. Trek fatigue: Star Trek Next Gen, with then simultaneous Deep Space Nine, with then simultaneous Voyager
    2. Scott Bakula was still too recognized from Quantum Leap, making him at that time a bad casting choice.
    3. Fans were immediately resistant to anything different that came too close to rewriting Trek history or tradition. (The show came straight out of the gate with a folk opening theme and red Klingon blood.)

    Now that enough time has passed, and now that the new shows have shamelessly fricked with canon and changed a lot of shit, people are much more receptive to Enterprise, and discovering that it was a very good show. I think if Paramount had simply given the franchise a cool-off period and then released Enterprise, it would have lasted more than four seasons and there wouldn’t have been such a long wait for the newer (albeit terribly disappointing) shows.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Now that enough time has passed, and now that the new shows have shamelessly fricked with canon and changed a lot of shit, people are much more receptive to Enterprise, and discovering that it was a very good show. I think if Paramount had simply given the franchise a cool-off period and then released Enterprise, it would have lasted more than four seasons and there wouldn’t have been such a long wait for the newer (albeit terribly disappointing) shows.
      If you want to improve Enterprises chances of getting more than 4 seasons you need it to be on a different network to UPN. UPN did not have great reach and poorly scheduled Enterprise. On top of that you had the CBS and Time Warner merger that killed UPN (and with it Enterprise).

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Oh, man. I had forgotten all about that. Yeah, none of that helped, AT ALL.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        none of that should have mattered. they should have known that 3 more seasons of ENT would pay for itself quickly enough. nobody is rewatching any of the UPN CW garbage that followed ENT.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          No show has ever survived a network switch.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Rumor has it that SciFi wanted to take on ENT, it would have had a lower budget, though. They had recently picked up Stargate SG-1 which had five seasons on Showtime, and then five more on SciFi, which proves that some shows can indeed survive a network change.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              going from premium to basic is workable, somewhat, as basic automatically has more viewers. going from UPN to basic cable would've been lateral, audiencewise, and still lost most of the audience, even more if there was clearly a budget cut.

              hell, most people saw the massive budgetary difference between the stargate movie and series and automatically (and correctly) dismissed it as complete garbage

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Stargate the show was 100x better than the movie. Stay mad, Emmerich.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                bruh sg-1 was star trek for morons

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                No

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            american idol
            last man standing
            futurama
            scrubs
            it happens all the time. usually around the time ENT ended, 4-5 seasons then 2-3 somewhere else.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              bruh you listed reality tv and three sitcoms. one that was animated and during fox's "we hate good shows" period.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Brooklyn 99
                Buffy the vampire slayer
                JAG

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >sitcom
                >upn = wb
                >shoestring budget procedural

                the only one you listed that didn't take a ratings hit was futurama, because fox was intentionally fricking up its ratings, and none of the ones you listed were barely holding onto a million viewers, the way enterprise was.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                if UPN=CW ENT doesnt change networks

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >nobody is rewatching any of the UPN CW garbage that followed ENT.
          That is hindsight. Besides, even without the merger you still need UPN to be better in its secluding and promotion of the the show. There is also apparently something about a UPN network executive that had it out for Enterprise since S1.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            its not hindsight. there are multiple trek cons every year around the world. anything they produce will be profitable in the long run. it was dumb not to give it 7 seasons and tell the full story the set out to.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              until nutrek, most trekkies generally agreed that enterprise was, at best, boring.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Enterprise was already decreasing in viewership numbers - it was most likely going to be a downward trend if UPN remained or if it went to a new home. A big part of the reason it even got a fourth season was to try and reach 100 episodes (the number desired for syndication). If you want Enterprise to get seven seasons you need to have it handled better from the outset, either by UPN itself or on a different network.

                ent is still on cable today. thats not at all surprising and thats why they should have done 7 seasons. it doesnt matter if it wasnt appreciated or profitable at the time, it was always going to be profitable years later.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >ent is cheap programming
                wow i'm shocked

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >it was always going to be profitable years later.
                Network executives don't think in those timeframes. They won't be in the job 10 to 20 years later, having retired or moved elsewhere. They need results now.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Enterprise was already decreasing in viewership numbers - it was most likely going to be a downward trend if UPN remained or if it went to a new home. A big part of the reason it even got a fourth season was to try and reach 100 episodes (the number desired for syndication). If you want Enterprise to get seven seasons you need to have it handled better from the outset, either by UPN itself or on a different network.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Trek fatigue
      see

      >[franchise] fatigue
      Not a real concept. Seated in the idea that it’s impossible to have made something bad, it’s the audience’s fault, in fact, they’re just tired of how good everything is!

      The reality is voyager sucked, ds9’s ending sucked (and was generally built around the idea the federation had to actually suck, as the writers couldn’t figure out any other way to write it), and given the chance to make Star Trek, but actually gritty/scrappy, they chose to just rehash tng/ds9/voy scripts, except all the characters are morons under the command of Scott bakula doing his best dubya impersonation.

  51. 2 years ago
    Bashirfaggot

    Should Cardies have tails?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Who says they don’t? Have we ever seen more of them than from the neck up? They could have tiny vestigial tails they keep tucked. I imagine this would be a closely-guarded, shameful secret.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Never reply to tripgays.

  52. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    first and second season sucked
    i really liked the xindy 3rd season and 4th was pretty good as well
    and compared to kurtzman's trek its a fricking masterpiece

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      first and second seasons have some gems in them (Carbon Creek) but yeah they're mixed quailty overall

  53. 2 years ago
    Bashirfaggot

    I like ENT more than TOS and VOY. Fight me.

  54. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    would another 3 seasons of Enterprise (ignoring These Are The Voyages) work nowadays? Just fast forward 20 years or so and Archer can be president/admiral
    Kurtzman has to STAY AWAY from it though

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No. It doesn't matter of Kurtzman is involved or not. All the current crop of tv writers have monkeypox. All of them. There's no way to write an acceptable Star Trek show today. Wait another 50 years maybe.

      • 2 years ago
        Bashirfaggot

        Was it the writers strike? After that they just started hiring people fresh out of college to replace expierenced writers? I cannot believe the guy who wrote Batman and Robin with the rubber nipples writes Picard.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The Guild Strike saw a lot of seasoned writers fired who would grandfather in the new talents and filter out the hopeless. Now that that’s gone, not only is there the ever-present nepotism problem limiting talent, but also an often unreasonable diversity quota, which not only further limits talent, but also presents an intimidation factor (“if I tell them their idea is bad I might get fired for being sexist/racist”).

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            See

            Never reply to tripgays.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Star Trek will probably be the first all AI generated series.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        but Bakula will be gone in 50 years

  55. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I seem to remember for the last season they stopped undressing for the decon chamber and there weren't any more of these scenes.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I cannot say if true but, it is not as if they stopped with fanservice these

        [...]

        I think are from S3 (or maybe 4).

  56. 2 years ago
    Bashirfaggot

    Can I just post Star Trek art made by Japanese people? Is that cool?

  57. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why did they even make Picard French?
    >English actor.
    >Reserved.
    >Tea drinking.
    >Fan of Shakespeare & Gilbert and Sullivan.
    Picard is the most English Frenchman ever. They may as well just have made him English.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      in the Star Trek universe the English won the Hundred Years War

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        More like the 300 years’ war.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        In that case England would probably become more Frenchified than France becoming Anglicised. England in that period was a backwater relative to the stronger France. A big reason why the war lasted as long as it did was due to England being united compared to what was a often disunified France.

  58. 2 years ago
    Bashirfaggot

    What am I looking at?

  59. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Gen X trekkers thought the theme song was about religion and wrote off the whole show, but watching it again as a clear headed adult made me realize it's pretty good, except for the time travel shit.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Gen X trekkers thought the theme song was about religion
      true actually
      but back then the heretical US evangelicals were almost on par with the current troony degeneracy, regarding the levels of meming and annoyance

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      false, we correctly surmised the theme song was nucountry, and never listened to it past the first syllable the vocalist drawls out.

  60. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it's the best star trek show, not even meming

  61. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    just watched the risa episode where the two clowns are troony spotting at the bar. kinda based ngl. when we get bioscanners for real....hehehe

  62. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Can we get a real /trek/ thread next?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The general is up.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, as mods are actively policing /trek/ to protect nutrek shilling

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Hahahahahaha

        Get rekd

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      sure, if you ignore the middle part of that transition. not sure why anyone would, other than crippling mental moronation of course.

  63. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >tripgay is tired of being targeted
    >doesn't just drop the trip
    tripgay logic

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      It’s called integrity, dumb b***h.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >i have integrity!
        >i drop my trip when it suits me though
        lol, tripgays

        • 2 years ago
          Bashirfaggot

          I've been getting banned a lot so I have been dropping my trip. I get banned less when I'm Anon.

      • 2 years ago
        Bashirfaggot

        bump

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *