remember how people used to say that family guy was all cutaway gags and wouldn’t last compared to the Simpsons?
In reality, those gag jokes are still funny today while the Simpsons has aged terribly
4 is good. I grew up with 1-3 and watched those on boxed sets before it was renewed on Fox again, so those will always have some special meaning to me. But whenever they dropped the whole "stewie wants to kill louis" schtick made the show much more enjoyable and less cringey
That's because the Big Bang theory is the Creation sotry in scientific disguise you dimwit. The Big Bang Theory is completely discredited now, it gets contradicted by observable evidence every singe experiment. You may have even heard of the "Crisis in Cosmology".
>heh stupid christians, science says everything was created by the Big Bang, not some fake god >Big Bang is about creation? Uhhhhh actually the Big Bang has been disproved! >shuffles papers and pulls out random criticism of Big Bang >heh, stupid christians, science says X
>Christians: >Evolution is fake, science is fake, space isn't real, the earth is flat, dinosaurs never existed, everything the Bible says is 100% true and actually happened
>Also Christians: >Look at all these amazing scientific discoveries made by Christians!!!
I hate the 'x: also x:' meme so much bros, even when applied to people I despise like socialists it's a format I dislike, like when the capitals and lower cases are jUMblEd LiKE tHiS.
>Cinemaphile user: hate the 'x: also x:' meme so much bros, even when applied to people I despise like socialists it's a format I dislike >also Cinemaphile user: like when the capitals and lower cases are jUMblEd LiKE tHiS.
>Christians built bridges for centuries >Therefore Christians build the best bridges and are always the friend of bridge building projects despite burning bridge builders
Nice argument pal
I will maintain until my dying day that there is no place you will find a higher concentration of catholic converts, or at least high church Black folk than a humanities department.
god exists just as much as anything exists if you can think of it. what is existence.
read some fricking descartes and go along with it until you arrive absolutely nowhere. because that is what existence is about and defines it.
yes, i might be high.
By Allah the eyes of the faithful are too pure to behold such low buffoonery. As for you the taste of the the sandals of the righteous is too good for you.
actually educated atheists don’t say this. they accuse christian philosophers like aquinas and leibniz of just following pure a priori logic and not empiricism. you can make logical arguments for God, just not empirical ones. something like the principle of sufficient reason is a logic based theistic argument. an atheist who actually knows that they’re talking about is attacking religion from an empiricist, not idealist, position. but most atheists are moronic
>Atheists: >Um well you see everything came from nothing- no, nevermind where it came from- and then um BIG BOOM and then everything was created and I fricking love science!!!!!!!
>god appeared from nowhere
nobody says this. the entire premise is that there must be an eternal foundation to reality because nothing begetting things makes no sense
>what caused big bang? >we don't know >aha that means god is real! >what created god >he always existed!
why the universe couldn't have been always existing then? infinite, having no distinguishable begining nor end, merely changing form, like from singularity to our reality?
>prime mover
Stop regurgitating thousand years old pseudological conjectures and answer the question - why the universe itself couldn't be cyclical and as such have no moment of creation, thus eliminating the need for any "first cause"?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Not him but cyclical processes still need an energy input. Even very efficient ones like the balance wheel on a watch need an input.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Processes within the universe, yes. Not the universe itself, it's a closed system as far as we know. No need for any input other than itself. Otherwise it becomes an infinite chain of "inputs". And creationists just handwave it with moronic >first cause doesn't need a prior cause because... well because it's THE FIRST don't you get it
As I see it, the universe is, like Ouroboros, completely cyclical, with no moment of creation, only different form of it's state. Luke seasons, like water and ice. Like singularity and 3 dimensions.
>infinite, having no distinguishable begining nor end
How does this not freak you the frick out? The scariest thing is that anything exists at all.
Anthropic Principle. If the universe wouldn't allow for the eventual rise of life there wouldn't be anyone to observe it's existence. Some see this is as an argument of for Fine Tuning. But there are valid counter-arguments against it. Like, with my hypothesis in mind, there could've been any number of "cycles" where laws of the universe wouldn't allow for the existence of life, therefore no one to detect it's existence. It's like many-world interpretation except there is only one world and infinite different states of it.
Atheism won't even exist in the near future.
Atheism = low birth rates = your people don't breed and high birth rate highly religious Muslims replace your population.
How's that secularism working out for you Europe?
The way I see it is the new seasons have funny cutaways but the plot of the main episode is shit. The older seasons had a good story and gags but the cutaways broke the tension of a moment and kind of ruined it. I was they could do what they did with Brian and Stewie getting locked in the bank vault more because that was probably the most heartfelt and interesting episode I've seen to this day nothing has topped it for me. I wish they would get rid of cutaways but I understand why they can't because if they did there wouldn't be anything interesting about the show now.
1-6
S4 is good
remember how people used to say that family guy was all cutaway gags and wouldn’t last compared to the Simpsons?
In reality, those gag jokes are still funny today while the Simpsons has aged terribly
simpsons is reddit for nerds
family guy is reddit for geeks
why are you obsessed with reddit?
Penis
4 is good. I grew up with 1-3 and watched those on boxed sets before it was renewed on Fox again, so those will always have some special meaning to me. But whenever they dropped the whole "stewie wants to kill louis" schtick made the show much more enjoyable and less cringey
Wait till atheist midwits find out The first proponent of the Big Bang was a Belgian priest and the Catholic Church funded science for centuries
That's because the Big Bang theory is the Creation sotry in scientific disguise you dimwit. The Big Bang Theory is completely discredited now, it gets contradicted by observable evidence every singe experiment. You may have even heard of the "Crisis in Cosmology".
>heh stupid christians, science says everything was created by the Big Bang, not some fake god
>Big Bang is about creation? Uhhhhh actually the Big Bang has been disproved!
>shuffles papers and pulls out random criticism of Big Bang
>heh, stupid christians, science says X
lol. It is still the prevailing cosmological model. But you don't believe in the Big Bang Theory and are just saying because it corroborates Genesis.
>It is still the prevailing cosmological model
Not for much longer. It's basically on its last legs as a theory.
So, why are christisraelites seething so hard at the big bang then?????
they don't?????
Yes they do, to the max and you know it.
>Christians:
>Evolution is fake, science is fake, space isn't real, the earth is flat, dinosaurs never existed, everything the Bible says is 100% true and actually happened
>Also Christians:
>Look at all these amazing scientific discoveries made by Christians!!!
strawman
Not a strawman. Christians flip flop between denying science and claiming the best scientists are Christian
see
that's another strawman
Responding to a caricature you've created in your head doesn't prove anything, anon.
>when my two strawmen don’t agree
Atheist
>Christians are LE BAD!
Also atheists:
>NOOOO don't say anything bad about my heckin Muslims or israeliteerinos they're heckin oppressed!!!
I hate the 'x: also x:' meme so much bros, even when applied to people I despise like socialists it's a format I dislike, like when the capitals and lower cases are jUMblEd LiKE tHiS.
>Cinemaphile user: hate the 'x: also x:' meme so much bros, even when applied to people I despise like socialists it's a format I dislike
>also Cinemaphile user: like when the capitals and lower cases are jUMblEd LiKE tHiS.
Catholicism is crypto-paganism, hence why it's based. Praise Sol Invictus and Pontifex Maximus... erm I mean God and Pope.
>Christians built bridges for centuries
>Therefore Christians build the best bridges and are always the friend of bridge building projects despite burning bridge builders
Nice argument pal
>burning bridge builders
moron detected, never happened. also 90% of the shit you listed is not at all implied in his post
Sauce, you Black person
I will maintain until my dying day that there is no place you will find a higher concentration of catholic converts, or at least high church Black folk than a humanities department.
>jesuit priest
>not an atheist
ok, but God still doesn't exist
Season 8
Already debunked
I can disprove it - children with cancer
Female behavior
How was the universe created?
By Mother Gaia :^)
>if god bad why do good thing happen
>if god good why do bad thing happen
what is the purpose of god again?
God doesn't exists
god exists just as much as anything exists if you can think of it. what is existence.
read some fricking descartes and go along with it until you arrive absolutely nowhere. because that is what existence is about and defines it.
yes, i might be high.
Is that the heckin' based and chungus black science guy???
>in a interview with stephen colbert
>black science man
By Allah the eyes of the faithful are too pure to behold such low buffoonery. As for you the taste of the the sandals of the righteous is too good for you.
actually educated atheists don’t say this. they accuse christian philosophers like aquinas and leibniz of just following pure a priori logic and not empiricism. you can make logical arguments for God, just not empirical ones. something like the principle of sufficient reason is a logic based theistic argument. an atheist who actually knows that they’re talking about is attacking religion from an empiricist, not idealist, position. but most atheists are moronic
Magic's not real anon.
What would a book called logic for first graders even contain?
>Atheists:
>Um well you see everything came from nothing- no, nevermind where it came from- and then um BIG BOOM and then everything was created and I fricking love science!!!!!!!
>god appeared from nowhere
nobody says this. the entire premise is that there must be an eternal foundation to reality because nothing begetting things makes no sense
and then the eternal foundation of reality told some israelites in the desert that they need to cut pieces of their dicks off and never eat shrimp
Good advise at the time tbh. No showers or soap meant infections.
>cutgay pathetic cope
>what caused big bang?
>we don't know
>aha that means god is real!
>what created god
>he always existed!
why the universe couldn't have been always existing then? infinite, having no distinguishable begining nor end, merely changing form, like from singularity to our reality?
Funny you mention "I don't know", when it's atheists who also say that, and immediately say it DEFINITELY wasn't a prime mover.
>prime mover
Stop regurgitating thousand years old pseudological conjectures and answer the question - why the universe itself couldn't be cyclical and as such have no moment of creation, thus eliminating the need for any "first cause"?
Not him but cyclical processes still need an energy input. Even very efficient ones like the balance wheel on a watch need an input.
Processes within the universe, yes. Not the universe itself, it's a closed system as far as we know. No need for any input other than itself. Otherwise it becomes an infinite chain of "inputs". And creationists just handwave it with moronic
>first cause doesn't need a prior cause because... well because it's THE FIRST don't you get it
As I see it, the universe is, like Ouroboros, completely cyclical, with no moment of creation, only different form of it's state. Luke seasons, like water and ice. Like singularity and 3 dimensions.
Anthropic Principle. If the universe wouldn't allow for the eventual rise of life there wouldn't be anyone to observe it's existence. Some see this is as an argument of for Fine Tuning. But there are valid counter-arguments against it. Like, with my hypothesis in mind, there could've been any number of "cycles" where laws of the universe wouldn't allow for the existence of life, therefore no one to detect it's existence. It's like many-world interpretation except there is only one world and infinite different states of it.
>infinite, having no distinguishable begining nor end
How does this not freak you the frick out? The scariest thing is that anything exists at all.
"No u"? I thought atheists were supposed to be smart 🙁
Frick you Archangel Michael's cute
Atheism won't even exist in the near future.
Atheism = low birth rates = your people don't breed and high birth rate highly religious Muslims replace your population.
How's that secularism working out for you Europe?
The way I see it is the new seasons have funny cutaways but the plot of the main episode is shit. The older seasons had a good story and gags but the cutaways broke the tension of a moment and kind of ruined it. I was they could do what they did with Brian and Stewie getting locked in the bank vault more because that was probably the most heartfelt and interesting episode I've seen to this day nothing has topped it for me. I wish they would get rid of cutaways but I understand why they can't because if they did there wouldn't be anything interesting about the show now.