>there were advanced civilizations before 10,000BC (lol)
>there are nearly no remnants of them because cataclysmic events destroyed everything (ridiculous)
>pyramids across the world are proof of the unified culture of those civilizations (absurd)
>every single archeologist is wrong but me
>every archeologist is involved in a conspiracy to conceal this truth
>bald muscle man and his million fans with no academic training agree with me
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
he's right and you are wrong. seethe harder.
He's not even an archaeologist
archaeologists are moronic homosexuals who have no idea what they are talking about and regurgitate whatever their choice of publication shits out. theyre glorified bookclub members.
Archaeologists know more about archaeology and ancient civilizations than anyone else, certainly more than you.
>regurgitate whatever their choice of publication shits out
Cope and seethe. Maybe Graham should actually write and article and get it peer-reviewed and published.
Nice fantasy
You would've cheered as they murdered Galileo. Mindless homosexual. Enjoy your short-lived career as the evidence becomes more and more undeniable and all you've assumed is proven to be the opposite.
I think I'll just keep publishing articles about trans folx in prehistory thanks
>trans folx
The preferred nomenclature is TWO SPIRIT you eurocentric chud
erm ackshully the GALA priests in sumeria??? they wuz kangs cuz they got the black heads
>Originally specialists in singing lamentations, gala appear in temple records dating back from the middle of the 3rd millennium BC. According to an old Babylonian text, Enki created the gala specifically to sing "heart-soothing laments" for the goddess Inanna.
wewlad war truly never changes
no but he did ayahuasca once so he knows his shit, bro
youre wrong and so is he. seethe deez nutz.
White people destroyed most of the world's civilizations
Whypipo dun wash dey legs
>there are nearly no remnants of them because cataclysmic events destroyed everything (ridiculous)
>Redditland
>hyper-advanced, hyper-intelligent civilisations were oblivious to the sea level rising over the course over 9000 years and never thought to move
and never needed anything inland that would ever leave evidence, no mining, no forestry, no agriculture.
>hyper-advanced, hyper-intelligent civilisations
According to you.
>sea level rise over the course of 9000 years
There were centuries where it rose by over half a meter and if your IQ were higher than your body temperature then you would understand how that could destroy a coastal civilisation.
Jokes on you I've got a fever.
relatively primitive tech in a constrained society as well as whatever diseases and barbarian hordes they had to contend with, it's not hard to conceive that a decently advanced civilization may have existed but lost everything due to a chain of terrible things happening.
don't make me wikipedia this shit.
is this a meme or real?
moron
doggerland is real
the idea that it could have held a civilization and was wiped out instantly as doggerland suddenly dropped beneath the waves is moronic
Virtually all were buried underwater by the Meltwater Pulse B when the area that would become the Black Sea and coastal areas around pre-flood Anatolia were flooded. They were the first civilizations after the 100,000 years of rape wars with the Neanderthals. The rest are built on the Levant, over thousands of years of old structures.
Don't you understand that academics don't want to admit to being wrong, so they always conceal everything? There's plenty of proof, but they won't let you see it.
Academics always admit they are wrong. I listened to a seminar at my uni the other week by an archaeologist who said "my previous theory has been proven wrong" and presented new ideas.
Why are you lying? Have you actually spoken to an archaeologist? How many journal articles have you read?
>my no name loser homosexual professor said he was wrong
Yeah, of course. He's wrong more than you know. Its the men in charge that we are discussing here, not you, you powerless academic twat.
>No name
More like an extremely prominent, highly cited expert
>you powerless academic twat.
You know nothing about academia, you're not even university educated. You couldn't even tell me how many articles you've read.
Go back to coding or driving trucks, this is our discipline and we won't let idiots like you drag it down
You know nothing about what you speak of. You're a homosexual. Case-closed. Archeologists are the biggest homosexuals in the universe.
Just drive your trucks while we unlock the mysteries of our past
You will never understand true archeology because you are an archeologist, thus a homosexual.
Blue collar workers should be lobotomized and their mouths sewn shut
Gobleki Teppe. Nuff said. Seethe as blue collar workers supplement your existence as a bookclub homosexual who reads the most slop. You'll never have the eyes capable of seeing truth, even if it was right in front of you.
You only know one archaeological site and you keep regurgitating it
Yes there is actually but it's for educated people only
Explain Gobleki Teppe. You cant. LOL!
Semi-nomadic trading hub
>blah blah blah
Speak English four-eyes.
So...not nomadic. They just went on hikes?
They would've settled down in certain seasons where there wasn't a lot of hunting to be done
That makes sense. They would build gigantic stone megaliths every time they got bored. Whenever there isnt a lot of food, why not build gigantic stone structures
>You couldn't even tell me how many articles you've read.
Is there a MyAnimeList for JSTOR you pompous c**t
It's a pretty common trope, starting in even in ancient greece, of great innovators and thinkers being treated as outcasted liars, heathens or morons for going against status quo. I'm sure this time it's different.
Except this time the geniuses don't even have a basic understanding of archaeology and consistently misrepresent the facts
They had their, now known to be moronic and wrong, arguments at that time that echo what you said. Weird, how such things repeat.
what a stupid fricking post. if an academic makes a discovery, literally anything at all, they shout it to the heavens and show everyone they fricking can. why? because it brings them money and recognition, which is all they care about. you think they care more about more about having an incorrect theory on their books than they do about being fricking famous for discovering the truth? you're a fricking moron
W R O N G !
>he thinks the established heads of academia whose discoveries and reputations would be upended by the newcomer will simply roll over and relinquish their positions
Don't be naive. Peer review is nothing but a way for established members to skim discoveries from powerless upandcomers by thumbing through them then resubmitting the discovery under their own name and magnanimously sharing the discovery. Just so long as it doesn't rock the boat too much. If it does it's simply suppressed.
if the establishment only exists to skim fame and glory off the top of every discovery, wouldnt they jump at the opportunity to attach themselves to the discovery of a lifetime that rocks the boat of archaeology?
if getting your name recognized is all that matters, wouldnt they publish those outlandish claims at every opportunity they get?
if there was any evidence for a pre ice age advanced civilization, literally everyone would be throwing money at it, from universities to governments, for the bragging rights alone, rewriting the history of your country and humanity. theres absolutely no way to sit on this for long
>jump at the opportunity to attach themselves to the discovery of a lifetime
Not at all.
Imagine that you run an archeological department.
You have access to very limited funding for digs.
Now imagine that some student is like, "I've been analysing maps and I think there could be a sunken something or other under the sea floor off the coast of Morocco."
Are you going to fund that multi-million dollar dig?
No you aren't, you are going to fund a near guaranteed dig in the treasure trove that is Turkey or North Africa or something because of an object that some random farmer accidentally dug up (vast majority of digsites are not found through research but by luck).
>if there was any evidence for a pre ice age advanced civilization, literally everyone would be throwing money at it, from universities to governments, for the bragging rights alone, rewriting the history of your country and humanity
>rewriting the history of your country and humanity
This is the problem. Histories are firmly intertwined with ethnic groups. Groundbreaking discoveries like these can upend existing ethnic claims to land and result in all sorts of downstream consequences. Are you not aware of why NA natives are so vehement about maintaining total control of any and all remains, burial grounds and artifacts remotely attributable to their people? Egyptian academics are the same way for the same reason with the trove of Egyptian artifacts they hold under lock and key. There's a frick of a lot more at stake here than just personal scientific glory. There are deeply rooted political motivations behind what these people do.
>There's a frick of a lot more at stake here than just personal scientific glory. There are deeply rooted political motivations behind what these people do.
Just like with how China has been twisting the denisovan findings into how chinese people are superior.
You conceded, again moron
That's not how science works mate. Put the bong down.
>how science works
It's how humans work you fricking moron.
It took 50 years for the mainsteam story about Tintagel to change because the lead expert on it was wrong and everyone just regurgitated what he said until new digs took place.
Even for WW2, which is within living memory, there's a shit ton of wrong literature.
Even pretending that Nazism is the same as Fascism is a political move by Communist professors to try and seperate those ideologies from their own.
wow
i lost braincells by reading this crap
you are as dumb as graham hanwiener is
I accept your concession
>humans stacked rocks in a vaguely similar way = it was all done by the same people
you have to be literally fricking moron to believe this guy
>TRUST THE SCIENCE
>Gobekli Tepe
>OK WEE WERE WRONG BUT NOW THE SCHIENCE IS PERFECT
The only based thing about the dude is that he sprinkles some Aryan/Hyperborea stuff in his books. He is a massive brainlet otherwise.
i wonder how much of it is even conscious, because he'll go off and take a milquetoast "UGH WHITE COLONISTS SUCK!!! MING TREASURE VOYAGES RULE!" stance every now and then. in spite of articles painting this guy as a massive super nazi, I don't get any racial superiority angles from him
The idea of ancient 'advanced' civilizations existing in the third world and attributing all of the advancements of ancient indigenous thirdies to "they found the tech" is an old racist trope. Same deal with Atlantis in Africa or North America
Don't see how it couldn't be conscious. He implies pretty strongly that those civilizations were white in at least one of his books.
Who knows though, maybe he's changed his mind over time.
you can tell this is true because it makes israeli people mad
>same company that made the black cleopatra doc also made this
>morons believe it
loving every laugh
Both are equally as factual. Seethe harder.
Black person detected. You were the same shoeshines then you are today.
And that's ok because the world needs shiny shoes.
Cinemaphile how do I integrate my haplogroup autism with the ancient apocalypse framework
>pyramids, from China to Peru
Do NOT bring up the link between Peru, Iran, New Zealand and the entire PNW coast from northern Oregon to Alaska
the damage control is real (from archeologucks)
science advances one death at a time
Genesis 1:2 YLT98
[2] the earth hath existed waste and void, and darkness [is] on the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God fluttering on the face of the waters,
The literal translation of Genesis describes an Earth which already exists but has had all life obliterated and needs to be repopulated.
>watch homosexual american DEBOONKER 'archeologist' with many views
>he claims that archeological digs always go down to bedrock
>immediately close video