YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS THIS ISN'T BURGER KING!!!!
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah you can. If it fits into both categories you can. Penguins are considered mammals despite the bird features. They are basically mamillian reptiles.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Penguins are considered mammals
wtf
2 years ago
Anonymous
A coconut has fur and produces milk, it is a mammal?
>incredibly broad taxonomical clade covering almost all life on earth including ancestors of birds as well as actual fricking birds
NOOOOO NOT ONE FEATHER NOOOOOO MY STEVEN SPIELBERG RUINED NOOOOO
It's so cute how this thread brings all the morons experts.
You have no idea how many fossils we have with feathers in them.
We even used the feathers to find out which colors they were, through preserved melanosomes in them.
The majority of theropods were feathered and even some ornithischians were feathered.
I'm sure your expertise on Spielberg films is more relevant than paleontological findings.
>Majority of theropods and even some ornithiscians
I like when people try to take your argument and repeat it with slightly different wording then try to make it seem like they've not only proven you wrong but they didn't just frick themselves from any further counterarguments once it's pointed out to them how right they proved you
>"Most theropods" are now "most carnivores"
Well yeah. How many carnivorous dinosaurs aren't theropods?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Damn and you thought your comment about "Spielberg paleontology" was a real zinger huh
It's okay anon, we're all new to dinosaurs at some point, I'm not mad at you
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Damn and you thought your comment about "Spielberg paleontology" was a real zinger huh
Wrong anon >posts phylogenic tree showing nearly all carnivorous dinosaurs are theropods >we're all new to dinosaurs at some point
What did he mean by this?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Two of these are non theropods, 3 are possible basal theropods and the rest are all theropods
Holy shit, you're embarrassing, buddy
All carnivorous dinosaurs were theropods, you do know that right?
"These first dinosaur populations varied and evolved into new forms including the ancestors of the long-necked sauropods and a group called the theropods, which includes all known carnivorous dinosaurs."
2 years ago
Anonymous
Nice "Google recommended search result" retort but unfortunately you've already lost this argument with no sign of reversal and no hope of ever coming out of it looking as cool as me--which is to say, as cool as a featherless dinosaur
2 years ago
Anonymous
Name a single carnivorous dinosaur that wasn't a theropod.
ONE.
You'll be banned otherwise
2 years ago
Anonymous
shringasaurus
whatever the frick they're doing to spinosaurus now
a confused pentaceratops
2 years ago
Anonymous
>shringasaurus
That's a diapsid reptile. >whatever the frick they're doing to spinosaurus now
Not only a theropod but the largest and most based theropod that has ever existed.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The argument wasn't against "all carnivores being theropods", the argument was "only some dinosaurs have feathers", in which case being that only 28 major species of theropods have been discovered in a pool of roughly 800 dinosaur species currently on the books, you've successfully qualified for what Junior Soprano would quote as being "someone who's so far behind in the race they actually think they're ahead"--but just because I want to embarrass you a little bit further, what is "sauropodomorphs", specifically ones like Herrerrasaurids which have been removed from the Theropodae for having features more similar to sauropods than theropods to the point of overwhelming disqualification
Suffice to say, featherbros still lose this one
2 years ago
Anonymous
No, no, no. I'm not letting you get away with that israelitery.
You did not say "only some dinosaurs have feathers", you said "only very specific cases" of dinosaurs had feathers. The retort was that the majority of all carnivorous dinosaurs were not "very specific cases".
That's the end. Accept you misspoke and move on.
And I didn't even bring up the fact you implied that paleontogists were peddling that all dinosaurs had feathers before and only now are saying only theropods were feathered, even though that was never the case.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>No no no I'm not letting you get away with being objectively and irrefutably right, I'm the one who must be right
If this were an ancient battleground you would have become my slave in the afterlife at this point anon
Anyway scalebros win
2 years ago
Anonymous
>The argument wasn't against "all carnivores being theropods"
You might not have been arguing that, but
Damn and you thought your comment about "Spielberg paleontology" was a real zinger huh
It's okay anon, we're all new to dinosaurs at some point, I'm not mad at you
>"Most theropods" are now "most carnivores"
Keep trying to climb out of that hole you dug yourself there Chief Bigbrain
seems to be
2 years ago
Anonymous
Sauropodomorphs were literally fully feathered though
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anon I understand you're upset you completely lost any hope of ever winning the most one sided argument in all of crypto/prehistorical-biology but there's no need to blatantly make things up just as a Hail Mary, it's bad form and unbecoming of a gentleman
2 years ago
Anonymous
>you're upset you completely lost any hope of ever winning the most one sided argument
You've mixed people up for the second time. Read Hunter et al. 2014. Reading papers instead of blog posts will go a long way. The paper is a description of first stage filaments in Europasaurus
2 years ago
Anonymous
Pick at ankleshots all you like my ill-aimed friendo, the fact still stands as a monolith above all your ilk that the majority of dinosaurs did not have feathers and no amount of fanfiction will change this
2 years ago
Anonymous
>that the majority of dinosaurs did not have feathers
I never said anything to the contrary though, I am already aware of this. Sauropodomorphs and a handful of theropods are the only feathered dinosaurs
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Anon, how could you say some dinosaurs have feathers? >Anon it's absurd to lie and say most dinosaurs have feathers >You're misrepresenting science when you say every dinosaur had feathers
Literal pilpul, Chaim.
2 years ago
Anonymous
But anon dinosaurs didn't have feathers
2 years ago
Anonymous
Then how did they fly
2 years ago
Anonymous
helium sacks
2 years ago
Anonymous
Then how did they land
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anon, Top Gun Maverick literally just came out, it explains everything
2 years ago
Anonymous
What an eye opener
2 years ago
Anonymous
Dinosaurs had helicopter propellers. Prove me wrong.
2 years ago
Anonymous
You're right they did, but those props were unfeathered
2 years ago
Anonymous
Helicopter propellors are powered by oil, oil is dinosaurs that were turned into oil over millions of years. How could a dinosaurs propeller be powered in dinosaur present if oil is dinosaur future. You cannot refute this.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>literally not a single post claiming most dinosaurs were feathered >moron carries this strawman for over 200 posts.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Is objectively wrong and makes up nonsense for 400 posts straight >Definitely has skin polyps where his fingers should be which explains his inability to type anything other than anti-truther featherbro propaganda
Pick one
2 years ago
Anonymous
Are you autistic? This post genuinely makes no sense.
Oh, you're butthurt about dinosaurs having feathers and you claimed carnivorous dinosaurs weren't all (or even most) theropods, of course you're autistic. Funny how you became quiet when you got btfo on that and then made up an argument that no one was making to refute. Extremely funny.
2 years ago
Anonymous
But anon...the majority of dinosaurs didn't have feathers
2 years ago
Anonymous
How many times are you going to repeat that? This shit is just embarrassing now. lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anon...it's okay to be wrong...
2 years ago
Anonymous
You actually think that saying that all, or most carnivorous dinosaurs are theropods is wrong?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anon, most dinosaurs didn't have feathers though
2 years ago
Anonymous
Answer the question.
Were you or weren't you this poster:
>"Most theropods" are now "most carnivores"
Keep trying to climb out of that hole you dug yourself there Chief Bigbrain
Damn and you thought your comment about "Spielberg paleontology" was a real zinger huh
It's okay anon, we're all new to dinosaurs at some point, I'm not mad at you
?
I know you're embarrassed, but no one here knows you, so be honest.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anon I know you're embarrassed but Jesus accepts you for who you are even if you think dinosaurs had feathers like some kind of heretic
2 years ago
Anonymous
2 years ago
Anonymous
cool fossil bird
2 years ago
Anonymous
How many birds without beaks and with reptile faces you know of? Could you post the picture of one?
2 years ago
Anonymous
but your lizardface fossil looks like it has hairy spines those dont look like feathers at all
have any better evidence professor?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Look up Archaeopteryx lmao
2 years ago
Anonymous
look up piltdown man
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Someone faked fossils before so anything that disrupts my fantasy is fake
Obvious amerimutt
2 years ago
Anonymous
i accept your concession
2 years ago
Anonymous
Satan placed those bones there bro
2 years ago
Anonymous
So how many lizardfaced birds covered in furry spikes you know of?
Also, yes.
2 years ago
Anonymous
This is the problem. "Dinosaur" is a very broad term. There were dinosaurs of all variety just like the genetic diversity today.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Most dinosaur species are birds and all birds have feathers, therefore most dinosaur species have feathers.
Going to see this Saturday with my dinosaur obsessed girlfriend. She will probably be too busy watching the movie to even give me a handy. Frick dinosaurs.
Maybe a bit but not severely. She works as a police dispatcher and makes good money for the area. She does a good job. Works like 16 hours overtime this week, next week, and the week after because the turnover rate is so bad for new hires.
Dinosaurs aren’t cute in general. That stuffed toy is cute, Jurassic Park dinos aren’t. Adult men who like dinosaurs are autistic. Women who like dinosaurs are rare and usually autistic.
Nah. I don't even think she ever rode a horse. I was into horses as a kid though because all my aunt's bred them. She is schizo when it comes to her likes. We have 5 cats, 6 parakeets, 2 mice, 2 hamsters, a male and female turkey who never seem to be able to reproduce (thank God) and 17 or so chickens.
We are both infirtile. The scarring in my dickhole prevents me from having kids. Even if I fixed it she wouldn't be able to have kids. My dad had the same scarring, got it fixed, and instaltly produced me.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Infertile
Hahahahaha homosexual. Give her to me, I'll give ya some great sons
2 years ago
Anonymous
I don't think you actually read my post. She is confirmed to be infirtile from ovary cysts.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Why are you dating a meme?
2 years ago
Anonymous
did you not read how he has dickhole scars?
~a match made in heaven~
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because I love her and we have been together for 15 years (half my life.) I love kids but I don't think I want my own. I have already been having to raise my little cousins, nephews, and nieces. I have had enough kids in my life.
2 years ago
Anonymous
having kids of your own is a true gift, I'm sorry for you and your woman, me and my girl of 8 years are planning on having like 5 in the next couple years, I hope they're mostly boys
2 years ago
Anonymous
Yeah, feels bad, man. But I would rather have a part er for life than some gen Alpha homosexual troony son. Not that your kids would be, don't get me wrong. Just a real possibility today.
Kek. We got it because we actually do have two black roosters. One is a total count and has taken over the pecking order because the last alpha got grabbed by neighborhood dogs. He also has made the other rooster an outcast and I have to feed him separately.
Just don't buy them in a store. The Erlikosauras cost like $40 at Tractor Supply and you can get it for half from their website. Which is where most of them came from.
It was good. Infinitely better than the second JW.
Biggest redpill is that women are so narcissistic that they are willing to give birth to themselves but "fixed" so that they can live longer.
The final redpill about this shit is that it’s just different factions of dinogays making shit up to smear other factions of dinogays. >Rexcel paleontologists watch JP3 >see the spinochad kill the rexcuck >they seethe >uhhh breaking news guys! The spinosaurus was actually a big hecking duckerino! TRUST THE SCIENCE
Frick you soi bois
Dinosaurs look EXACTLY how they did in Jurassic Park and that’s 100% factual.
>W-what's wrong, anon-kun? Don't you want to frick my completely smooth and featherless (while still being completely paleontologically and biologically correct as backed by irrefutable evidence) dinopussy?
>include a feathered raptor variant for realism >it swims perfectly underneath ice for some reason
why is everything so fricking stupid all of the time
>why is everything so fricking stupid all of the time
with the fall of christianity nobody selects for intelligence anymore, just height or boob size, we've gone idiocracy
i thought it was going to take decades longer...
If dinosaurs were reptiles why do no modern reptiles have feathers? Surely at least some would have retained the trait. Nah. I think look at alligators. That's closer to what they would look like.
they are in current clownworld
hell they even recatagorized dogs as 'omnivores' because people were figuring out feeding carnivores corn kibble was fricked up
I have a female turkey that will lay down in front of me and raise her tail feathers. Such a bawd. The male turkey is actually jealous of me and sometimes tries to sneak up on me to kick me. But you can hear him coming because he is a massive unit and I kick him first. This dude will stand on her back and hump at her despite the tail feathers blocking him. He is incompetent.
>another dinosaurs and feathers thread hitting bump limit for the 10th time this week
is it really worth getting worked up over? it’s fricking Dinosaurs. are you all 12?
They mentioned that Sorna dinos were also relocated to biosyn, could be the pair we saw from JP2. Camp Cretaceous canon being questionable aside, it's also entirely possible that another party started breeding rexes. There is already an illegal breeding farm at the start of JW3, and dino DNA was widely being circulated in black markets worldwide
I doubt it's Buck and Doe, you're probably right about it being Big Eatie and Little Eatie. Their color schemes looked to match. I assume whatever happens in S5 of CC ends up with them getting snagged by Biosyn
But the movie makes it abundantly clear that Biosyn only engineers pure, unedited dinosaurs with their original genomes, and also that all of the dinosaurs in their preserve are rescues from InGen crops, meaning that Pyroraptor is InGen and therefore inaccurate as it has a genome that has been tampered with
This only furthers the scaly truth that dinosaurs weren't feathered
>Alberto Palleroni of the Neotropical Raptor Center near Panama City told Vera and me that a couple of years earlier, while working with a rehabilitated Harpy Eagle, he had an experience that forever impressed on him this predator's immense strength. He was holding a mature eagle on his outstretched arm, much as a falconer would a falcon, when a chained dog got loose and sprinted across the compound grounds. The Harpy reflexively shifted its weight to track him and, with a talon pressure greater than that of a Rottweiler's jaws, broke Alberto's arm. In two places.
Dinosaurs were fully feathered, warm blooded, agile protoavians. No amount of coping will change that. You will never be scalie. You are worse than trans
Most dinosaurs had some feathers. Dromaeosaurs we're fully plumed but something like a triceratops probably only had quills.
2 years ago
Anonymous
But anon, feathers have been widely re-dismissed by paleontologists except in very specific cases and species
2 years ago
Anonymous
Most likely bullshit but even if true theropods were fully feathered and cladistically are ancestors of birds like raptors and chickens. Even if Dinosaurs had scales you can't throw away the genetic link.
my mind >oh frick look at that ass, frick dinosaurs are so hot, god i want to frick it
my mind also >if they aren't warm blooded then I'd be fricking cold sandy cloacas full of salmonella, birds are at least guaranteed better fricks
I don't like this dissonance.
Don't worry Anon, according to most modern studies, some day dinosaurs closer related to birds may have had warm blood. So you may have had a better cloaca frick than your fantasy thought.
>the one anon in the thread that started out trying to pass as an expert in paleontology and was so utterly buttfricked that ended up resorting to shitposting, spamming and posting Jesus
>had to move on from "very specific species had feathers" to "most theropod weren't carnivorous" to "dinosaurs didn't have feathers" just from sheer butt rapery he was submitted to
Glorious shit. Your entire psyche was fricked, you're in total coping mode.
>Pretending not to be the guy who said completely incorrect made up nonsense in order to come back and accuse someone else of being someone who made a flawless and impenetrable argument using hard evidence and then trying to say that perfect argument was actually somehow bad and wrong
Damn dude settle down ok
2 years ago
Anonymous
>doesn't know how to greentext
Dumb Redditor.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Dude his text was green, are you okay
2 years ago
Anonymous
Go back.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm going back and all I see is irrefutable proof that dinosaurs didn't have feathers
2 years ago
Anonymous
ive peer reviewed this statement for accuracy and it checks out
2 years ago
Anonymous
What about the studies that have consistently demonstrated under controlled conditions that you are ugly and has never had sex?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Listen I'm only trying to argue dinosaurs didn't have feathers, I can't change the truth in other fields
No seriously like I'll admit to the movie not being perfect but had they not cut that one scene it would have totally changed the entire dynamic of the movie subconsciously
It was so funny how they added quills to raptors in JP2, just to not commit completely to feathers.
I think that was JP3, and their justification was that only males had them
Top Reddit bottom Cinemaphile, end of.
science ruining shit once again
There is no science behind the "dinosaurs had feathers" shit.
Still alive.
Still has skeletal features of dinosaurs.
Has no fricking feathers.
Feather-gays infiltrating paleontology are like trannies infiltrating preschools.
why would you have feathers in the water, mate?
Ducks have feathers. Plenty of different kinds of waterfowl exist.
Crocodilians co-existed with dinosaurs, they were never dinosaurs. Fricking mongoloid with mutt education.
troony-equivalent.
Shit, you're probably an actual troony. Lets be real.
You’re an a schizophrenic virgin ESL Black person lol
Wow, what an argument! I guess crocodilians are dinosaurs now!
seething troony stealing right wing memes like clockwork. heres your (you)
Wojak isn't right wing, newhomosexual tourist.
Wait until you find out about birds bro
>isn’t a dinosaur
>no feathers
Who’d a thunk eh
Low functioning autist
fricking hell mate, i bet you think a Tuatara is a lizard
It's a mammal
FRICK DAH PALENTOLOGIST
The word was with God, b***h. And the word was God
can anyone name or post a pic of a lizard with feathers
Frick. I kneel. Lizards are birds.
Birds are reptiles. Not every reptile is a bird.
Sorry anon, the digits have spoken.
YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS THIS ISN'T BURGER KING!!!!
Yeah you can. If it fits into both categories you can. Penguins are considered mammals despite the bird features. They are basically mamillian reptiles.
>Penguins are considered mammals
wtf
A coconut has fur and produces milk, it is a mammal?
Yeah
If birds are reptiles, so are mammals.
Frick you're right
The are featherless and feathered reptiles. Not hard to grasp.
again i'd like to see a pic of a reptile with feathers that is living and non fictional if feather shills want to sway me on the equation here
frick you
Why? They aren't lizard, they are reptiles. Not all reptiles are lizards.
you knew what i meant b***h
Feathers came from scales, did you know that?
>no anon really, birds are lizards and lizards are birds
Meds. Now.
No. Just birds are reptiles. Reptiles like snakes are not birds. Stop being like this. Lizards are a subgroup of reptiles.
Birds came from reptiles, yes, that is correct.
>you knew what i meant b***h
xbox, wreck this clown
uhh
>ask for feathers
>provides scales
a buffoon posted this
Its called an avus gecko for a reason, they're feathers
>they're feathers
In no way whatsoever are they feathers.
>Its called an avus gecko
No it isn't.
>Its called an avus gecko
http://www.reptiles4all.com/media/b52e858c-89d4-428d-bd62-912ec9692c15-giant-fish-scaled-gecko-geckolepis-maculata
homosexual
There was one in Jurassic world
Dinosaurs aren't lizards so I don't know what that would achieve.
Can you name or post a pic of a bird without a beak?
>That file name
Cardinals are considered exotic? Are there no Cardinals outside the US?
it's because that dinosaur has a funny hat
That is nothing compared to other birds like certain parrots and wieneratiels.
Top pic is an "Atrociraptor" which was genetically altered on purpose, to be fair.
He's not arguing about accuracy, he just thinks it's a shit design and feathered raptors look cooler.
>cooler
More like a six-foot turkey.
homosexual sperg
Bottom looks like trash tho
as posted from an iphone
This is the most transgender post I've ever read
End of what?
Only good scene was the Diemetrodon cave and I’m so glad they didn’t depict them as mammals
>I’m so glad they didn’t depict them as mammals
why do you fear the truth?
The truth is homosexualry
There was a baby Placerias in the black market in Morocco that had some hairs on it.
>a shaved ape in a eight and a human being knife fighting a GinsuChicken.
Fricking ESL tard
>incredibly broad taxonomical clade covering almost all life on earth including ancestors of birds as well as actual fricking birds
NOOOOO NOT ONE FEATHER NOOOOOO MY STEVEN SPIELBERG RUINED NOOOOO
Frick off, you soience-loving trannie. Dinosaurs look cooler without feathers.
no they don't
die, shitstain
Yes they do. have a nice day, shitskin.
Peawieners are so annoying. Neighbor has some and they are always screaming that "HAAAAAAAAAAAA" shit in a high pitch.
There's a bunch of them where I work. Makes me wanna raise some at home.
no u
You are a subhuman sperg and will never reproduce
That’s cool, though. It’s like your living in some kind of old jungle explorer movie.
Just in time for feathers to be widely re-dismissed by paleontologists except in very specific cases and species, go figure
It's so cute how this thread brings all the morons experts.
You have no idea how many fossils we have with feathers in them.
We even used the feathers to find out which colors they were, through preserved melanosomes in them.
The majority of theropods were feathered and even some ornithischians were feathered.
I'm sure your expertise on Spielberg films is more relevant than paleontological findings.
>Majority of theropods and even some ornithiscians
I like when people try to take your argument and repeat it with slightly different wording then try to make it seem like they've not only proven you wrong but they didn't just frick themselves from any further counterarguments once it's pointed out to them how right they proved you
Good job nutfrick
So most of the carnivore dinosaurs are now "very specific" cases?
Oh, ok, didn't know that, dumb stupid c**t.
>"Most theropods" are now "most carnivores"
Keep trying to climb out of that hole you dug yourself there Chief Bigbrain
>"Most theropods" are now "most carnivores"
Well yeah. How many carnivorous dinosaurs aren't theropods?
Damn and you thought your comment about "Spielberg paleontology" was a real zinger huh
It's okay anon, we're all new to dinosaurs at some point, I'm not mad at you
>Damn and you thought your comment about "Spielberg paleontology" was a real zinger huh
Wrong anon
>posts phylogenic tree showing nearly all carnivorous dinosaurs are theropods
>we're all new to dinosaurs at some point
What did he mean by this?
Two of these are non theropods, 3 are possible basal theropods and the rest are all theropods
Holy shit, you're embarrassing, buddy
All carnivorous dinosaurs were theropods, you do know that right?
"These first dinosaur populations varied and evolved into new forms including the ancestors of the long-necked sauropods and a group called the theropods, which includes all known carnivorous dinosaurs."
Nice "Google recommended search result" retort but unfortunately you've already lost this argument with no sign of reversal and no hope of ever coming out of it looking as cool as me--which is to say, as cool as a featherless dinosaur
Name a single carnivorous dinosaur that wasn't a theropod.
ONE.
You'll be banned otherwise
shringasaurus
whatever the frick they're doing to spinosaurus now
a confused pentaceratops
>shringasaurus
That's a diapsid reptile.
>whatever the frick they're doing to spinosaurus now
Not only a theropod but the largest and most based theropod that has ever existed.
The argument wasn't against "all carnivores being theropods", the argument was "only some dinosaurs have feathers", in which case being that only 28 major species of theropods have been discovered in a pool of roughly 800 dinosaur species currently on the books, you've successfully qualified for what Junior Soprano would quote as being "someone who's so far behind in the race they actually think they're ahead"--but just because I want to embarrass you a little bit further, what is "sauropodomorphs", specifically ones like Herrerrasaurids which have been removed from the Theropodae for having features more similar to sauropods than theropods to the point of overwhelming disqualification
Suffice to say, featherbros still lose this one
No, no, no. I'm not letting you get away with that israelitery.
You did not say "only some dinosaurs have feathers", you said "only very specific cases" of dinosaurs had feathers. The retort was that the majority of all carnivorous dinosaurs were not "very specific cases".
That's the end. Accept you misspoke and move on.
And I didn't even bring up the fact you implied that paleontogists were peddling that all dinosaurs had feathers before and only now are saying only theropods were feathered, even though that was never the case.
>No no no I'm not letting you get away with being objectively and irrefutably right, I'm the one who must be right
If this were an ancient battleground you would have become my slave in the afterlife at this point anon
Anyway scalebros win
>The argument wasn't against "all carnivores being theropods"
You might not have been arguing that, but
seems to be
Sauropodomorphs were literally fully feathered though
Anon I understand you're upset you completely lost any hope of ever winning the most one sided argument in all of crypto/prehistorical-biology but there's no need to blatantly make things up just as a Hail Mary, it's bad form and unbecoming of a gentleman
>you're upset you completely lost any hope of ever winning the most one sided argument
You've mixed people up for the second time. Read Hunter et al. 2014. Reading papers instead of blog posts will go a long way. The paper is a description of first stage filaments in Europasaurus
Pick at ankleshots all you like my ill-aimed friendo, the fact still stands as a monolith above all your ilk that the majority of dinosaurs did not have feathers and no amount of fanfiction will change this
>that the majority of dinosaurs did not have feathers
I never said anything to the contrary though, I am already aware of this. Sauropodomorphs and a handful of theropods are the only feathered dinosaurs
>Anon, how could you say some dinosaurs have feathers?
>Anon it's absurd to lie and say most dinosaurs have feathers
>You're misrepresenting science when you say every dinosaur had feathers
Literal pilpul, Chaim.
But anon dinosaurs didn't have feathers
Then how did they fly
helium sacks
Then how did they land
Anon, Top Gun Maverick literally just came out, it explains everything
What an eye opener
Dinosaurs had helicopter propellers. Prove me wrong.
You're right they did, but those props were unfeathered
Helicopter propellors are powered by oil, oil is dinosaurs that were turned into oil over millions of years. How could a dinosaurs propeller be powered in dinosaur present if oil is dinosaur future. You cannot refute this.
>literally not a single post claiming most dinosaurs were feathered
>moron carries this strawman for over 200 posts.
>Is objectively wrong and makes up nonsense for 400 posts straight
>Definitely has skin polyps where his fingers should be which explains his inability to type anything other than anti-truther featherbro propaganda
Pick one
Are you autistic? This post genuinely makes no sense.
Oh, you're butthurt about dinosaurs having feathers and you claimed carnivorous dinosaurs weren't all (or even most) theropods, of course you're autistic. Funny how you became quiet when you got btfo on that and then made up an argument that no one was making to refute. Extremely funny.
But anon...the majority of dinosaurs didn't have feathers
How many times are you going to repeat that? This shit is just embarrassing now. lmao
Anon...it's okay to be wrong...
You actually think that saying that all, or most carnivorous dinosaurs are theropods is wrong?
Anon, most dinosaurs didn't have feathers though
Answer the question.
Were you or weren't you this poster:
?
I know you're embarrassed, but no one here knows you, so be honest.
Anon I know you're embarrassed but Jesus accepts you for who you are even if you think dinosaurs had feathers like some kind of heretic
cool fossil bird
How many birds without beaks and with reptile faces you know of? Could you post the picture of one?
but your lizardface fossil looks like it has hairy spines those dont look like feathers at all
have any better evidence professor?
Look up Archaeopteryx lmao
look up piltdown man
>Someone faked fossils before so anything that disrupts my fantasy is fake
Obvious amerimutt
i accept your concession
Satan placed those bones there bro
So how many lizardfaced birds covered in furry spikes you know of?
Also, yes.
This is the problem. "Dinosaur" is a very broad term. There were dinosaurs of all variety just like the genetic diversity today.
Most dinosaur species are birds and all birds have feathers, therefore most dinosaur species have feathers.
Going to see this Saturday with my dinosaur obsessed girlfriend. She will probably be too busy watching the movie to even give me a handy. Frick dinosaurs.
>dinosaur obsessed girlfriend
I don’t believe you.
This giant thing sleeps with us.
turn yourself in
My girlfriend is 31 and older than I am by 6 months.
Disturbing. Is she autistic? I already know the answer because of the dinosaur thing, but just checking.
Maybe a bit but not severely. She works as a police dispatcher and makes good money for the area. She does a good job. Works like 16 hours overtime this week, next week, and the week after because the turnover rate is so bad for new hires.
Good for you, anon. Enjoy your dinosaur movie with the missus.
Dinosaurs aren’t cute in general. That stuffed toy is cute, Jurassic Park dinos aren’t. Adult men who like dinosaurs are autistic. Women who like dinosaurs are rare and usually autistic.
Adult women still like cute shit, anon. Jesus, get out the house.
They're basically children mentally.
What’s her booba and pusy like
Bags of sand and salty milk with pennies.
does it ever get invited to join in on the fun?
She has humped against it when trying to seduce me and I did not want to frick. Sometimes it is just too much work.
>I did not want to frick
Happens way more often than you might think. It's even a trope in television. See Al Bundy.
Lmaooooo I can’t even Pham
Yes these are in the bathroom on the sink.
She's a keeper that one, she gets it
>schleich
she has horses too, doesn't she
Nah. I don't even think she ever rode a horse. I was into horses as a kid though because all my aunt's bred them. She is schizo when it comes to her likes. We have 5 cats, 6 parakeets, 2 mice, 2 hamsters, a male and female turkey who never seem to be able to reproduce (thank God) and 17 or so chickens.
christ have some kids with her
We are both infirtile. The scarring in my dickhole prevents me from having kids. Even if I fixed it she wouldn't be able to have kids. My dad had the same scarring, got it fixed, and instaltly produced me.
>Infertile
Hahahahaha homosexual. Give her to me, I'll give ya some great sons
I don't think you actually read my post. She is confirmed to be infirtile from ovary cysts.
Why are you dating a meme?
did you not read how he has dickhole scars?
~a match made in heaven~
Because I love her and we have been together for 15 years (half my life.) I love kids but I don't think I want my own. I have already been having to raise my little cousins, nephews, and nieces. I have had enough kids in my life.
having kids of your own is a true gift, I'm sorry for you and your woman, me and my girl of 8 years are planning on having like 5 in the next couple years, I hope they're mostly boys
Yeah, feels bad, man. But I would rather have a part er for life than some gen Alpha homosexual troony son. Not that your kids would be, don't get me wrong. Just a real possibility today.
Schleich figures are based. I have a walrus.
>black wiener
anon, i...
Kek. We got it because we actually do have two black roosters. One is a total count and has taken over the pecking order because the last alpha got grabbed by neighborhood dogs. He also has made the other rooster an outcast and I have to feed him separately.
>schleich
Good taste
I too have a walrus
i always wanted a collection of these hard plastic dinos. mad jelly
Just don't buy them in a store. The Erlikosauras cost like $40 at Tractor Supply and you can get it for half from their website. Which is where most of them came from.
It was good. Infinitely better than the second JW.
Biggest redpill is that women are so narcissistic that they are willing to give birth to themselves but "fixed" so that they can live longer.
the feather takeover starts now
Evolution is just a theory.
Dumb Amerimutts who say this forget it's the only working theory of biodiversity.
There are actually people on this earth today that believe dinos had feathers
Wait, people here actually think dinos were featherless? Frick's sake, how are you guys this moronic?
The final redpill about this shit is that it’s just different factions of dinogays making shit up to smear other factions of dinogays.
>Rexcel paleontologists watch JP3
>see the spinochad kill the rexcuck
>they seethe
>uhhh breaking news guys! The spinosaurus was actually a big hecking duckerino! TRUST THE SCIENCE
Frick you soi bois
Dinosaurs look EXACTLY how they did in Jurassic Park and that’s 100% factual.
>even dinosaurs got pozzed
Too bad its a horrible design
>featherbros
its over dinochads
we lost
He looks so kind. or maybe bored
>W-what's wrong, anon-kun? Don't you want to frick my completely smooth and featherless (while still being completely paleontologically and biologically correct as backed by irrefutable evidence) dinopussy?
whatd you get banned for?lel
>include a feathered raptor variant for realism
>it swims perfectly underneath ice for some reason
why is everything so fricking stupid all of the time
These are jurassic world movies what'd you expect?
i'd have been happier if they strapped a laser beam to it's head and just embraced what they are
Did you sleep through the Malta scenes or are you incapable of understanding a Jurassic World movie?
>why is everything so fricking stupid all of the time
with the fall of christianity nobody selects for intelligence anymore, just height or boob size, we've gone idiocracy
i thought it was going to take decades longer...
Lmao
Komodo Dragons are the most based creature in existence. If only the Tasmanian Tiger were still around.
Sometimes I think that being a paleontologist is just coming up with a bunch of Pokedex entries.
Were dinosaurs the white mans animals? No other race seems to care about dinosaurs
Chinks clearly care. There is a metric frickin if Asiatic dinos discovered by China.
Probably by accident, dinosaurs belong to the white race.
Counterfeits
If dinosaurs were reptiles why do no modern reptiles have feathers? Surely at least some would have retained the trait. Nah. I think look at alligators. That's closer to what they would look like.
Google “bird”
Birds aren't reptiles dumy
they are in current clownworld
hell they even recatagorized dogs as 'omnivores' because people were figuring out feeding carnivores corn kibble was fricked up
Go look at a chicken's or turkey's leg. The are scaled. It actually grosses me out and there are diseases that target those scales.
Yes they are moron autist. Go back to your jurassic park toys
Birds are considered reptiles, my man.
Gay revisionist science. What's next mamals are actually mineral and animal? Hogwash. Phooey. Balderwiener.
Mammals are reptiles, which are a type of fish.
BASED
horsefeathers
>feathers
frick
God finds a new way to mock us daily.
Pegasus' exist bro.
>mammals are actually mineral and animal?
I fricking hope so
>He doesn't know most mammals are composed of iron, phosphorous, sulfurates, calcium and potassium
Don't tell him anon, let him live in a Rhyhorn-free world
Magnificent
Really this gets to the heart of the issue. Everything is made of atoms, therefore classification is a spook we shall speak no more.
Bees are fish, if you haven't heard.
they looked back on their old photos and realized they looked like gays and would like you to stop bringing up their feather phase
Dino threads attract a special kind of autist, its quite intriguing really
You would
You think I wouldn't recognize a thicc lizard when I see one?
Dinosaurs actually looked like Elton John.
Where's that Christgay from /x/ who always gets mad at the feathers?
feathers are just modified scales
even if dinosaurs did have feathers they were not like a birds
I think this lizard has covid 19
baby birds are just always horrific looking
secretary bird
Is this a Aggretsuko reference?
You would
But she poops from there
No I do not poop from my reproductive organs. Only trannies do and at that point they are not even reproductive organs.
I have a female turkey that will lay down in front of me and raise her tail feathers. Such a bawd. The male turkey is actually jealous of me and sometimes tries to sneak up on me to kick me. But you can hear him coming because he is a massive unit and I kick him first. This dude will stand on her back and hump at her despite the tail feathers blocking him. He is incompetent.
kek
Has anyone ever even seen a dinosaur feather?? A real one from a real dinosaur?? No? CASE CLOSED.
I have
Dinosaurs according to Cinemaphile.
t rex if he real
>It has feathers, so it can swim and resist the cold
That is the fricking opposite of how fluffy feathers work. It should look like a Penguin if its really an Antarctic Aquatic Raptor
I thought this was an orangutan with its arm held up high at first.
>another dinosaurs and feathers thread hitting bump limit for the 10th time this week
is it really worth getting worked up over? it’s fricking Dinosaurs. are you all 12?
Seems like it
feathered dinosaurs is the hill i die on
Sometimes a man has to stand firm against nonsense.
>Not fiercely defending his dino beliefs on opposing factions.
Pathetic anon
>are you all 12?
no are you a woman?
hah
gottem
posters defending their opinion on either side have souls, you however have no soul
Holy shit that beak could crack that girl's skull. Horrifying.
It could actually puncture the skull, probably.
They aren’t dinosaurs they’re some mutt mix of hermaphrodite frogs.
see any feathers?
didnt think so
It literally has a beard of feathers
Nice mammal bro
ill see your bird and raise you three birds
What bird is this? Looks like a tropical pigeon or something.
Pink-necked green pigeons
Habitat: Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam
How to seek them in from customs?
I'm assuming these two were the Rexes that Rexy ends up bonding with at the end of the movie. Unless someone made more Rexes somehow...
They mentioned that Sorna dinos were also relocated to biosyn, could be the pair we saw from JP2. Camp Cretaceous canon being questionable aside, it's also entirely possible that another party started breeding rexes. There is already an illegal breeding farm at the start of JW3, and dino DNA was widely being circulated in black markets worldwide
I doubt it's Buck and Doe, you're probably right about it being Big Eatie and Little Eatie. Their color schemes looked to match. I assume whatever happens in S5 of CC ends up with them getting snagged by Biosyn
dinosaurs didnt have feathers
FEATHER SISTERS
WE MADE IT
But the movie makes it abundantly clear that Biosyn only engineers pure, unedited dinosaurs with their original genomes, and also that all of the dinosaurs in their preserve are rescues from InGen crops, meaning that Pyroraptor is InGen and therefore inaccurate as it has a genome that has been tampered with
This only furthers the scaly truth that dinosaurs weren't feathered
>anti feather trannies have to deny the existence of fossils just to make believe their favorite childhood dinosaurs
It's OVER
>Alberto Palleroni of the Neotropical Raptor Center near Panama City told Vera and me that a couple of years earlier, while working with a rehabilitated Harpy Eagle, he had an experience that forever impressed on him this predator's immense strength. He was holding a mature eagle on his outstretched arm, much as a falconer would a falcon, when a chained dog got loose and sprinted across the compound grounds. The Harpy reflexively shifted its weight to track him and, with a talon pressure greater than that of a Rottweiler's jaws, broke Alberto's arm. In two places.
when I went to see it at the kinoplex an idiot in the room exclaimed: "do they have feathers now?"
lol what a moron
Wait, you guys actually believe dinosaurs didn't have feathers? This wasn't a joke? Are you guys actually anti vaccine too????
>Are you guys actually anti vaccine too?
Feathergays confirmed trannies.
I am a trans woman but what does that have to do with dinosaurs?
dinochads we're back
we cant fix wikipedia but at least on this one corner of Cinemaphile
we won
I'm glad we all collectively realized here in this thread that dinosaurs were scaly, not feathered
Dinosaurs were fully feathered, warm blooded, agile protoavians. No amount of coping will change that. You will never be scalie. You are worse than trans
But anon, dinosaurs didn't have feathers
they hated him because he spoke the truth
>Dinosaurs were fully feathered, warm blooded, agile protoavians
holy shit bros we got us a time traveler in this very thread
Check the scientific consensus chud
I checked, it said featherless
i double checked, hes right
Most dinosaurs had some feathers. Dromaeosaurs we're fully plumed but something like a triceratops probably only had quills.
But anon, feathers have been widely re-dismissed by paleontologists except in very specific cases and species
Most likely bullshit but even if true theropods were fully feathered and cladistically are ancestors of birds like raptors and chickens. Even if Dinosaurs had scales you can't throw away the genetic link.
my mind
>oh frick look at that ass, frick dinosaurs are so hot, god i want to frick it
my mind also
>if they aren't warm blooded then I'd be fricking cold sandy cloacas full of salmonella, birds are at least guaranteed better fricks
I don't like this dissonance.
Don't worry Anon, according to most modern studies, some day dinosaurs closer related to birds may have had warm blood. So you may have had a better cloaca frick than your fantasy thought.
Don't worry Anon, according to most modern studies, dinosaurs were featherless so you would have a completely smooth entry
Muttposting with no source
>Muttposting with no source
Muttposting with no source
You sir are a Black person.
Sir that's no excuse to go around spreading lies that dinosaurs had feathers
>Dinosaurs had feathers
>Dinosaurs had scales
Dinosaurs aren't even real you fricking moronic globalists
DELETE THIS
I don't even believe in dinosaurs. Who gives a frick if they trying to turn the T-rex into Big Bird. They're both fictitious
>the one anon in the thread that started out trying to pass as an expert in paleontology and was so utterly buttfricked that ended up resorting to shitposting, spamming and posting Jesus
That's why I love dinosaur threads.
He was right though, his argument was irrefutable
You were violently raped and it was gruesome to watch. You'll probably never recover.
But anon...dinosaurs didn't have feathers
>had to move on from "very specific species had feathers" to "most theropod weren't carnivorous" to "dinosaurs didn't have feathers" just from sheer butt rapery he was submitted to
Glorious shit. Your entire psyche was fricked, you're in total coping mode.
>Pretending not to be the guy who said completely incorrect made up nonsense in order to come back and accuse someone else of being someone who made a flawless and impenetrable argument using hard evidence and then trying to say that perfect argument was actually somehow bad and wrong
Damn dude settle down ok
>doesn't know how to greentext
Dumb Redditor.
Dude his text was green, are you okay
Go back.
I'm going back and all I see is irrefutable proof that dinosaurs didn't have feathers
ive peer reviewed this statement for accuracy and it checks out
What about the studies that have consistently demonstrated under controlled conditions that you are ugly and has never had sex?
Listen I'm only trying to argue dinosaurs didn't have feathers, I can't change the truth in other fields
>fully grown men arguing emotionally over prehistoric dead animals they played with as children
NORMALgayS FRICK OFF
get real, just got home from the theater, this is the first thread i see. Nice
How was it?
It was good, shouldn't have cut the prologue scene though, ruined the ending's impact
Most positve review I've seen, ngl
No seriously like I'll admit to the movie not being perfect but had they not cut that one scene it would have totally changed the entire dynamic of the movie subconsciously
I fully agree, the prolouge is mirrored nicely within the movie, sad to see it go.
I think he looks cool
What mammal is that
Glad we settled that dinosaurs were featherless finally
True.
And if anyone is on the fence, just remember every single Cinemaphile jannie is a feathergay. So you should know what's actually true.
The worst of the entire series.