>female and male characters are captured >only the male one is tortured and beaten
>she gets "redeemed" or let off the hook instead of just being fricking evil and dying like the rest of the villains
You probably blame "muh woke SJWs" for this, as if it wasn't literal actual misogynists who codified this
Ironically SJWs are more likely to make stuff where women get violently beaten and treated just like men, as well as stuff where females have male antagonists and vice versa
Your "based Boomers" would have perished the thought
> as if it wasn't literal actual misogynists who codified this
Source:your butthole. I’m not a chud but it’s true that work creators push the “women can get hurt” shit
Bitch, it was the norm for literal centuries for writers to protect and defend women from "manly sensibilities" like getting hurt. Why the frick do you think 99% of slapstick involves males? Because Silent gen boomers thought girls getting hurt and humiliated wasn't funny.
Just because a few egotistical femcel winemoms and swifty teen basic b***hes can't stand the twatwaffen SS ever facing consequences doesn't change the fact that it's mostly the so-called "woke" who even has the balls to put women through the wringer like men go through in media. You would never have seen Boomer shows actually have women get seriously beaten, tortured, or even taken seriously enough to be antagonists, and then your ass would be complaining about why only men ever have bad things happening to them while women only get to be pretty, tidied up, and insulated
1 month ago
Anonymous
Fine, boomers helped cement this idea, but it’s silly to assume woke Tumblr b***hes don’t also think women shouldn’t get hurt and should always win. It’s even worse with the “women are better than men” bullshit
1 month ago
Anonymous
>It’s even worse with the “women are better than men” bullshit
Even THAT is a Boomer idea, b***h! All the Christcucks, Buddhistcucks, Muslimcucks, everyone say that the whole reason women should never get hurt is because they're better than men. That's why Muslim women wear burkas, because they believe that men are so inferior and demonic by nature that we can't control ourselves and would rape them if they didn't wear them.
All the woketards are doing is reinventing the exact same wheel that's been perfected a hundred times before. Except that's not even all of them and plenty of them have the exact opposite opinion that pitting men against women no holds barred is good
1 month ago
Anonymous
Holy schitzo post
1 month ago
Anonymous
Not reading all that? But post more atom eve ryona
I think its a bit of both
People who think women are special and deserve to be put above men, but also internally see them as lesser, and as such are afraid of treating them the same. Simultaneously misogynistic and "muh woke SJW".
You see these kinds of people all the time, they want to be morally righteous but are incapable of self-reflection. Shits annoying.
Bitch, it was the norm for literal centuries for writers to protect and defend women from "manly sensibilities" like getting hurt. Why the frick do you think 99% of slapstick involves males? Because Silent gen boomers thought girls getting hurt and humiliated wasn't funny.
Just because a few egotistical femcel winemoms and swifty teen basic b***hes can't stand the twatwaffen SS ever facing consequences doesn't change the fact that it's mostly the so-called "woke" who even has the balls to put women through the wringer like men go through in media. You would never have seen Boomer shows actually have women get seriously beaten, tortured, or even taken seriously enough to be antagonists, and then your ass would be complaining about why only men ever have bad things happening to them while women only get to be pretty, tidied up, and insulated
"Boys should never hit girls" is 18th century Boomer
"The future is female" is woke Zoomer
Combine those both and you get what the incels are freaking out about
1 month ago
Anonymous
>18th century Boomer
DO WORDS MEAN NOTHING
DO I NEED TO BREAK YOUR ANUS TO MAKE YOU SEE HOW NONSENSICAL THAT IS
1 month ago
Anonymous
I am a proud feminist and believe in beating the shit out of women equally as men.
Your manufactured grievance-driven shitposting is stupid, but I'll let you off the hook because I also think it's funny how you managed to derail OP's equally shitty coomer thread.
>Female Antagonist >She's a CEO of a massive corporate Empire >She's also a Real Estate Agent >She has two bratty children who're beyond spoiled (One's male One's female) >Despite their awful behavior she loves them dearly and continues to spoil them >She is also a Trad Wife >All she cares about is money and spoiling her family >She thinks Global Warming / Climate Change is made up an imaginary >She thinks Hippies are worse then communist >Believes god gave us this bountiful world to profit off its destruction
Watch The Secret of NIMH. The main character has no strength or natural fighting power, but it's still an enjoyable film because the actions have weight. The main character is also a literal mouse which is a symbol of smallness since Aesop.
>she gets "redeemed" or let off the hook instead of just being fricking evil and dying like the rest of the villains
ok, incels
>"women are beautiful and must never suffer for any reason"
>And we must write stories about these women who are beautiful and where nothing bad happens to them.
Based tradcath bros
You probably blame "muh woke SJWs" for this, as if it wasn't literal actual misogynists who codified this
Ironically SJWs are more likely to make stuff where women get violently beaten and treated just like men, as well as stuff where females have male antagonists and vice versa
Your "based Boomers" would have perished the thought
> as if it wasn't literal actual misogynists who codified this
Source:your butthole. I’m not a chud but it’s true that work creators push the “women can get hurt” shit
Bitch, it was the norm for literal centuries for writers to protect and defend women from "manly sensibilities" like getting hurt. Why the frick do you think 99% of slapstick involves males? Because Silent gen boomers thought girls getting hurt and humiliated wasn't funny.
Just because a few egotistical femcel winemoms and swifty teen basic b***hes can't stand the twatwaffen SS ever facing consequences doesn't change the fact that it's mostly the so-called "woke" who even has the balls to put women through the wringer like men go through in media. You would never have seen Boomer shows actually have women get seriously beaten, tortured, or even taken seriously enough to be antagonists, and then your ass would be complaining about why only men ever have bad things happening to them while women only get to be pretty, tidied up, and insulated
Fine, boomers helped cement this idea, but it’s silly to assume woke Tumblr b***hes don’t also think women shouldn’t get hurt and should always win. It’s even worse with the “women are better than men” bullshit
>It’s even worse with the “women are better than men” bullshit
Even THAT is a Boomer idea, b***h! All the Christcucks, Buddhistcucks, Muslimcucks, everyone say that the whole reason women should never get hurt is because they're better than men. That's why Muslim women wear burkas, because they believe that men are so inferior and demonic by nature that we can't control ourselves and would rape them if they didn't wear them.
All the woketards are doing is reinventing the exact same wheel that's been perfected a hundred times before. Except that's not even all of them and plenty of them have the exact opposite opinion that pitting men against women no holds barred is good
Holy schitzo post
Not reading all that? But post more atom eve ryona
I think its a bit of both
People who think women are special and deserve to be put above men, but also internally see them as lesser, and as such are afraid of treating them the same. Simultaneously misogynistic and "muh woke SJW".
You see these kinds of people all the time, they want to be morally righteous but are incapable of self-reflection. Shits annoying.
"Boys should never hit girls" is 18th century Boomer
"The future is female" is woke Zoomer
Combine those both and you get what the incels are freaking out about
>18th century Boomer
DO WORDS MEAN NOTHING
DO I NEED TO BREAK YOUR ANUS TO MAKE YOU SEE HOW NONSENSICAL THAT IS
I am a proud feminist and believe in beating the shit out of women equally as men.
Why are you white?
You want to talk about what happened?
based princess appreciators
>princesses
AKA CHEKA Target Practice
Your manufactured grievance-driven shitposting is stupid, but I'll let you off the hook because I also think it's funny how you managed to derail OP's equally shitty coomer thread.
>female and male characters are captured
>only the male one is tortured and beaten
You say that like it's a bad thing
1:it’s unrealistic and let’s me know the writer doesn’t want to hurt women
2:it deprives like of my ryona fetish
Nick pls you can't fix her
Well, that doesn’t mean he shouldn’t try.
>female antagonist
>male protagonist
>or vice versa
>no designated girl fight
>no romance hook
>just enemies to the end
>Female Antagonist
>She's a CEO of a massive corporate Empire
>She's also a Real Estate Agent
>She has two bratty children who're beyond spoiled (One's male One's female)
>Despite their awful behavior she loves them dearly and continues to spoil them
>She is also a Trad Wife
>All she cares about is money and spoiling her family
>She thinks Global Warming / Climate Change is made up an imaginary
>She thinks Hippies are worse then communist
>Believes god gave us this bountiful world to profit off its destruction
>female
AWOOOOOGA!!
Anyone got that picture about returns of beloved franchises with new female lead who's better than old male protags?
Watch The Secret of NIMH. The main character has no strength or natural fighting power, but it's still an enjoyable film because the actions have weight. The main character is also a literal mouse which is a symbol of smallness since Aesop.