Finally got to watch Oppenheimer.
I am 40 minutes in
I cant stand it
its flashbacks and bits of story
but it feel so... nothing.
40 minutes in is not a small time
this is not a well made movie
 |
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
|
Finally got to watch Oppenheimer. I am 40 minutes in. I cant stand it. its flashbacks and bits of story. but it feel so...
ok
its 1:30 and I quit watching this
there was pitiful ammount of good dialogue or interaction between well established characters.. something that makes or brakes movies like this
jesus, I think this is the worst high rated movie I ever encountered
It's not meant to be watched outside an imax kinoplex
>this is not a well made movie
so a typical nolan flick?
frick you
Inception is one of the best movies Ive seen
interstellar has the moments that wows you
memento is amazingly well thought through movie
and prestige is nice too
though now as I am writing this I can feel those cuts from scenes in oppenheimer being in prestige or begining of interstellar
but it kinda settled in after a while
oppenheimer seems dead set at cutting and switching and none of it is engaging, just - here have another exposition communists or something
>Inception is one of the best movies Ive seen
for sure bro but you have to go back and stay there homosexual
>Inception is one of the best movies Ive seen
In other words you're not into cinema.
enlighten us
name 3 cinema movies
frick off you tasteless moron
Okay, I'll bite.
El Topo (1970)
Autumn Sonata (1978)
お葬式 (1984)
Bro Jodorowsky is not good cinema
>le ebin Japanese letters
don't think you are getting any science in the film, it's mostly weird nude cuts and long discussions of nuclear weapons.
Wait for the very end when you get to hear what Einstein whispers, it makes the whole film worth it
It's a fricking shit movie and Oppenheimer isn't nearly as interesting or complex as Nolan thinks he is, in fact he's just a stupid moron.
Nolan lost the Oscar against the shape of water and against Gravity (I think). That broke him and now Nolan turns to an Oscar bait movie
The movie feels like a montage
like when you have a real movie theres a 2-5minutes of quit cuts where the montage how something gets from rocky to strong rocky or how team gets from members of 2 to members of 11
but here its just montage the whole movie, pacing issues I guess its called, its just feels so off.
That scene is an interview referring back to an interview that's referring back to another interview. It's clunky at first but once you get a handle on it it's an interesting and efficient way to portray the events. If you did it normally you would probably show the Pash interview in its entirety, then get to the train interview five minutes later and discuss a scene that had already happened, then an hour later you would get to the hearing where they talk about both interviews, and you would have completely forgotten everything that happened, so Nolan would have to cut back to those interviews anyway to orient you. This way he just has all three happen simultaneously and you can witness every event and its consequences in sequence.
I have not even consider that angle how scenes are shots from interviews of interviews of talk about moment in time.. anon with actual insight for once
It’s not for plebs, that’s for sure.
They should have called it Filterheimer.
I don't know, I'm a pretty dumb normie with normie tastes and I enjoyed it
>tick tock kids when they are forced to sit through a movie that's longer than 30 seconds
OP here.
The first PC game I played was quake.
The first movie Ive seen in the cinema was phantom menace.
No zoomers here you garbage worshiping moron.
>The first movie Ive seen in the cinema was phantom menace.
Noob
You should've watched Barbie instead.
Ive seen it on hbo during xmas, it was ok
made me laugh more times than I expected,
but I am actually easy to please
but I actually had expectation for this one
>I'm easy to please
There's your problem. Oppenheimer is meant for people who want to be labeled as 'hard to please'.
Enola WHAT?
Glorifying a Bolshevik traitor isn't kino. He's as bad as Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.
I laughed out loud when poor Oppenheimer mused that one of the worst things about the bomb is that people will blame israelites for it lol yeah probably my Heeb fren so you could like, yknow, not build a world ending bomb and grow tuhmaters with your titcow gf or something
So the film at all times defends the israelites, whether for the Manhattan Project or for Nazism? I haven't seen this shit yet.
How about you just sit and watch it instead of going on Cinemaphile every time you have a thought?
oh ok, I watched oppenheimer full 4 hours
when I was 40 minutes in nothing was happening
its not a good movie
Almost like Nolan is a hack who wants to be the second Kubrick except he has no talent?
Remember the industrial music videos on MTV and the apathetic youth as classified by the Simpsons?
This movie is actually meant to be watched like that.
They should have done exclusively double features with City of Life and Death playing first.
I know how this sounds but it gets better after the first 40 minutes or so. I was really off put by the same thing, the first section of the movie is like a speedrun of Oppenheimer's early life Wikipedia section. But then when he goes to Los Alamos it slows down a lot and becomes an actual movie. And that movie ans onwards its actually pretty great. But I agree he really messed up the beginning. You should finish the movie anon.
>40 minutes in is not a small time
It’s good that you stopped when you did. rdj’s monologue at the end sucked so much ass