She's around the same age that her mother starting walling hard. She peaked like 5 years ago. It's going to go downhill really fast now. That's why she's cashing in. She can even sense it.
>inside the magic
These guys are saying K. Kennedy will be fired from Disney since 2017.
Not that guy but she legitimately did switch agencies just before the first trailer for Madame Web dropped.
https://deadline.com/2023/11/dakota-johnson-signs-caa-daddio-fifty-shades-of-grey-1235634047/#!
Really seems like a situation where she got talked into doing something she wasn't enthused about and then fired them after the realisation it was shit. Now she's just going through the motions barely concealing her hatred of the movie.
>But Johnson’s conspicuous jump from WME to CAA in November — just days after a baffling first trailer debuted — raised industry eyebrows, along with a razz in her recent “SNL” monologue describing the film as “like if AI generated your boyfriend’s perfect movie.”
On some late night show, they asked Dakota if they need to watch the other Spiderman films in order to understand this one and she laughed saying something to the effect, >"No, you don't have to know anything about Spiderman to enjoy this film. Trust me!"
As if, to say, "I thought it was a Spiderman movie too, it's not."
>she's just going through the motions
She's acting no different than she did during the 50 Shades promo tours. Did you know that she had her own FOX sitcom?
There's studio projects she does for the money and then the indy shit she loves doing. Despite how she feels about selling out, Dakota still did SNL, all the red carpets, all the late shows. She's fulfilling her part of the contract. If she's not doing it enthusiastically enough for you, might I remind you that there's actors who do a film, cash the check, and then refuse to do promotion as promised. Everyone from Jim Carrey to Florence Pugh are bigger buttholes than Dakota.
I'm not calling her an butthole and I don't blame her for just going through the motions for a shitty movie, I'm just stating that's what it seems like she's doing.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Peace brother. I actually agree with you about her phoning it in during the press tour. I was just providing context for other anons.
This so hard. Even Michael Caine pretty much bragged about doing Jaws 3 for the money and shitting all over the movie after the fact. He said he never saw it, but he did see the house the movie paid for. KEK. All big name actors do this. Out of every 10 movies they do, maybe 2 are passion projects. The rest are for money and fame to keep the gravy train rolling. Because what a lot of people don't know is that actors can blacklist themselves. If they turn down role after role, sitting on some creative integrity high horse, eventually they stop getting offered roles. It happens. A lot.
Ngl, if my agent somehow tricked me into being a part of the Sonyverse over the MCU I'd not only fire them but I'd probably actually try to kill him for torpedoing my career out the fricking window
>agent somehow tricked me into being a part of the Sonyverse over the MCU
sure
but you seem to have at least a semblance of an idea what both is
these vapid prostitutes don't have a fricking clue and never even gave a shit keeping basic tabs on their own fricking industry
well deserved box office poison tags to both of them now
>She's yet to be in a good movie afaik
Suspiria was great. And she was only in The Social Network for like one minute, but that is a contemporary classic.
yea she is definitely making it pretty clear that different people in Hollywood work in different ways. She says openly that she doesn't watch most of the movies shes in.. she attributes this to anxiety or whatever.. i don't know it sounds like making a movie needs to be collaborative effort and the best movies will be made by the actors who are actively invested in the outcome of the end product and willing to express that by reviewing and providing input.. But at the same time, in many positions, that is not the actors role. They are a medium that the writer, producer, director, should manipulate to their desired end. The actor really shouldn't be the one reviewing film and saying "that could be re-written, that pause is too long, change that camera angle, that cgi looks cheesey" etc. Unless they're getting writing/producer credits.. If you go out to eat and the food gets to you cold, did the chef send it cold? or did the expediter leave it on the tray too long before bringing it out? who messed up? Did the dishwasher make your food cold? >She's yet to be in a good movie afaik
not her problem, shes a millionaire and she doesn't work to make pristine art solely for your enjoyment. SHe works to pay the bills and if she gets to make good art as a consequence, that would probably make her very happy.. But working actors don't have the privilege to wait for the perfect project.
audiences need to do better
the fact is movies are still as good as ever, but large swathes of the movie-going public are being brainwashed by right-wing grifters
The truth is I have more hope for independent incels making AI clips than I do Hollywood. And don't for a second think Hollywood isn't chomping at the bit to get into AI.
Hollywood does it for money while the incels do it for passion.
If they are given the same tools to work with I would place my bet on incel autists over Hollywood.
Hollywood only wants a certain amount of hours put in so the budget doesn't get too high.
Incels won't stop perfecting until they are satisfied.
She publicly states she never hung out with her other female cast from Madame Web on or off screen during filming or after filming
She has publicly/interviews stated she hasn't seen the final public cut of Madame Webb at all, didn't even stick around premieres to watch it either
Openly stated to public/interviews it was connected to SonyVerse Spider-Man Universe and would be connected to MCU in some form THEN majorly back steps after Madame Webb public release saying publicly/interviews that Madame Webb is a Stand Alone Sorry/Film
She states publicly/interviews she is willing to do Madame Webb Sequels
Madame Webb is currently projected to only make 25million during opening week on a 80million budget
People are literally walking out of theaters while film is still playing or putting vids up laughing their asses off cause of how horribly bad it is and edited after watching the whole movie.
Sony has no clue what they're doing with their Sony Comic Cinematic Universe of Spider-Man characters they hold the rights too
>Sony has no clue what they're doing with their Sony Comic Cinematic Universe of Spider-Man characters they hold the rights too
They should make movies based on those properties people actually want to watch. Not this AI-written shit or whatever the frick took over Hollywood in the past 4 years.
>Not this AI-written shit or whatever the frick
don't give them the leeway to say "oh actually this was a test run of AI"
real people sat down and wrote this fricking awful dreck and they should be held accountable
Oh I agree, but it just points to how ESG itself flattens a curve creatively that should not be flattened, less it reduces the thrill of the curve creatively. Safe never made for good art.
She publicly states she never hung out with her other female cast from Madame Web on or off screen during filming or after filming
She has publicly/interviews stated she hasn't seen the final public cut of Madame Webb at all, didn't even stick around premieres to watch it either
Openly stated to public/interviews it was connected to SonyVerse Spider-Man Universe and would be connected to MCU in some form THEN majorly back steps after Madame Webb public release saying publicly/interviews that Madame Webb is a Stand Alone Sorry/Film
She states publicly/interviews she is willing to do Madame Webb Sequels
Madame Webb is currently projected to only make 25million during opening week on a 80million budget
People are literally walking out of theaters while film is still playing or putting vids up laughing their asses off cause of how horribly bad it is and edited after watching the whole movie.
Sony has no clue what they're doing with their Sony Comic Cinematic Universe of Spider-Man characters they hold the rights too
>Sony has no clue what they're doing with their Sony Comic Cinematic Universe of Spider-Man characters they hold the rights too
They should make movies based on those properties people actually want to watch. Not this AI-written shit or whatever the frick took over Hollywood in the past 4 years.
nepotism and late stage capitalism, more specifically, being cheap as to hire cheap directors and writers than risk new ones who may lose you money is why hollywood is failing, not ai or "wokeness" there wasn't anything "woke" in the movie
Oh I agree, but it just points to how ESG itself flattens a curve creatively that should not be flattened, less it reduces the thrill of the curve creatively. Safe never made for good art.
In other words, they're creating art through filters and with bumpers. A paint by numbers isn't a work of art, and this has been the driving force of film (and arguably, the creative arts in general) for the past 5 years or so. Appeal to everybody and you appeal to nobody. Movies shouldn't be a market-tested laundry detergent commercial, yet here we are.
>Not this AI-written shit or whatever the frick took over Hollywood in the past 4 years
Don't blame AI for ESCG Blackrock diversity requirements.
But this shit is so egregious that it's likely an op of some kind to get SONY (Japan) to sell off the Spidey rights to ~~*Disney*~~. The way Blackrock funding works is to make valuable IPs toxic to audiences for a while so they can be purchased or claimed through debt-settlement by a single entity (Blackrock will eventually change it's name to "Entert-AI-nmentcorp" or some shit) then remove all wokery, supply AI tech for cheap and turn entertainment/content itself into a subscription/fee-for-use model where if you want your home AI to make a Star Wars or Mickey Mouse or He-Man movie with elements borrowed from each, you get hit with a small fee for each element used. And if you upload it, they either get all or most proceeds from views and possibly own any incidental innovations made in your personal mash-up that a large audience suddenly takes a shine to (allowing them to further license a specific sub-genre of mash-up as a "Hot Trend"). After ten year of this they will essentially own every possibly permutation of currently extant IPs and any newly emerging ones.
They're specifically targeting SONY like this (that nutty israelite ceo chick will be working for her tribe in this, not her SONY bosses in Japan) because SONY got ripped off hard by HW israelite scams back in the 80s and now hang onto their properties like grim death. So the israelites are now trying to make Spiderverse movies toxic af in the hopes SONY will sell them off to one of Blackrock's investment tentacles.
Dakota Johnson will be getting a big (hidden) payday to play this part of the "disgusted" star. All these influencers making meme videos are doing for the fake trending not the reality. If you think idiots like that have any sense of what is and isn't a good movie, just browse their timelines and posting history to see where their taste truly is.
Frick you Dakota PR team, you think I don't know this whole pretend to like limes then admit to lying thing was organic? You're not going to get me to like her with cheap tricks like that.
On the other hand, some more tasteful footkino might do the trick
>Madame Webb is currently projected to only make 25million during opening week
It's probably not even going to do. It's Friday was 4.3mil. Morbius did 17.3
It's painfully clear now that people just don't want to see female led superhero films. Captain Marvel was carried hard by Endgame hyp. The sequel being a giant flop proves it
>have a bunch of really attractive actresses, one of which is currently the most talked about woman in hollywood >don't just do sexy 12A spiderman and earn a billion dollars
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
>She publicly states she never hung out with her other female cast from Madame Web on or off screen during filming or after filming
That's because zoomerettes are only fun to look at, and not actually fun to interact with.
>Madame Webb is currently projected to only make 25million during opening week on a 80million budget
Won't be even close, see
>Madame Webb is currently projected to only make 25million during opening week
It's probably not even going to do. It's Friday was 4.3mil. Morbius did 17.3
[...]
[...]
nepotism and late stage capitalism, more specifically, being cheap as to hire cheap directors and writers than risk new ones who may lose you money is why hollywood is failing, not ai or "wokeness" there wasn't anything "woke" in the movie
This director is new, no previous experience on film and only a canceled failed project of a series. > there wasn't anything "woke" in the movie
LMAO the very concept of a full assemble of female superheroes carrying the film is woke in and of itself. Women don't care about capeshit unless it has atractive, shirtless male leads and/or their bfs/husbands drag them to the movies in the first place. Men don't care about female leads in general unless they spend most of the movie half naked or on tight spandex shoving their breasts and asses on the screen. Instead they keep making these borefests aimed at an imaginary queer feminist audience.
Anon
>have a bunch of really attractive actresses, one of which is currently the most talked about woman in hollywood >don't just do sexy 12A spiderman and earn a billion dollars
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
is right, they wasted their entire cast (including a lead whose entire career revolves around getting naked on screen) on a movie that no one could possibly give a frick about.
It's painfully clear now that people just don't want to see female led superhero films. Captain Marvel was carried hard by Endgame hyp. The sequel being a giant flop proves it
It makes it even more crazy given the fact that they knew full well what happened to the comic book industry once they shoehorned in the the race, LBGTQ+, and feminist ideology.
No superhero fan wants to be lectured to when they consume superhero stories.
They refuse to make them sexy and appeal to the male gaze, which was a major factor in their popularity. Hoe you adapt an explicitly visual medium to film but strip away the actual visual assets that drew fans in the first place is the most tone-deaf take possible, but encouraged due to (modern values). We live in an era of OnlyFans amateur porn stars being encouraged, open sexuality being encouraged, but a new Puritan filter applied to all major media outlets. It's fricking crazy.
You kidding? I'm a Dakotagay and nobody has even posted the time she sexually harassed an interviewer. She's a troll. Or a real evil person. Love her either way.
online, when people say someone in hollywood is "evil" it usually means they're probably a decent person IRL
the people who have things to hide put on a fake nice PR persona, it's schizos like her who act out that aren't hiding anything
Those email leaks confirmed they had that mentality with peripheral Spiderman projects ages ago but did it ever occur to them to actually make good movies while retaining the rights?
i sense a little bogging, am i the only one?
nah she learned her lesson from her mom shes all natural, except maybe a little foreskin cream
She's around the same age that her mother starting walling hard. She peaked like 5 years ago. It's going to go downhill really fast now. That's why she's cashing in. She can even sense it.
I don't think so, she'd have gotten her breasts done.
Mournful, desolate breasts.
That's the type of bogging only mother nature can provide
The movie came out? It came out?
Did she really?
No
oh okay
Yes she did
Yeah
https://insidethemagic.net/2024/01/madame-web-star-reportedly-furious-with-new-movie-drops-talent-agency-in-protest-aml1/
>insidethemagic.net
are you moronic?
Not that guy but she legitimately did switch agencies just before the first trailer for Madame Web dropped.
https://deadline.com/2023/11/dakota-johnson-signs-caa-daddio-fifty-shades-of-grey-1235634047/#!
Really seems like a situation where she got talked into doing something she wasn't enthused about and then fired them after the realisation it was shit. Now she's just going through the motions barely concealing her hatred of the movie.
it's still an assumption and insinuation based on incomplete information
could easily be a coincidence
It is and could simply be a coincidence but putting two and two together it seems like a reasonable assumption.
>But Johnson’s conspicuous jump from WME to CAA in November — just days after a baffling first trailer debuted — raised industry eyebrows, along with a razz in her recent “SNL” monologue describing the film as “like if AI generated your boyfriend’s perfect movie.”
https://variety.com/2024/film/features/sony-marvel-universe-kraven-madame-web-venom-1235884120/
On some late night show, they asked Dakota if they need to watch the other Spiderman films in order to understand this one and she laughed saying something to the effect,
>"No, you don't have to know anything about Spiderman to enjoy this film. Trust me!"
As if, to say, "I thought it was a Spiderman movie too, it's not."
>she's just going through the motions
She's acting no different than she did during the 50 Shades promo tours. Did you know that she had her own FOX sitcom?
There's studio projects she does for the money and then the indy shit she loves doing. Despite how she feels about selling out, Dakota still did SNL, all the red carpets, all the late shows. She's fulfilling her part of the contract. If she's not doing it enthusiastically enough for you, might I remind you that there's actors who do a film, cash the check, and then refuse to do promotion as promised. Everyone from Jim Carrey to Florence Pugh are bigger buttholes than Dakota.
I'm not calling her an butthole and I don't blame her for just going through the motions for a shitty movie, I'm just stating that's what it seems like she's doing.
Peace brother. I actually agree with you about her phoning it in during the press tour. I was just providing context for other anons.
This so hard. Even Michael Caine pretty much bragged about doing Jaws 3 for the money and shitting all over the movie after the fact. He said he never saw it, but he did see the house the movie paid for. KEK. All big name actors do this. Out of every 10 movies they do, maybe 2 are passion projects. The rest are for money and fame to keep the gravy train rolling. Because what a lot of people don't know is that actors can blacklist themselves. If they turn down role after role, sitting on some creative integrity high horse, eventually they stop getting offered roles. It happens. A lot.
It was Jaws 4, but yes.
>inside the magic
These guys are saying K. Kennedy will be fired from Disney since 2017.
Yes, and she also changed agencies.
she and Sweeny had their promo tweets tagged
>MCU
then later removed it and their agents on trailer day
Ngl, if my agent somehow tricked me into being a part of the Sonyverse over the MCU I'd not only fire them but I'd probably actually try to kill him for torpedoing my career out the fricking window
>agent somehow tricked me into being a part of the Sonyverse over the MCU
sure
but you seem to have at least a semblance of an idea what both is
these vapid prostitutes don't have a fricking clue and never even gave a shit keeping basic tabs on their own fricking industry
well deserved box office poison tags to both of them now
heh
Why should I not hold her accountable? She took the part, yes? She's yet to be in a good movie afaik
She was in the Social Network
>She's yet to be in a good movie afaik
Suspiria was great. And she was only in The Social Network for like one minute, but that is a contemporary classic.
yea she is definitely making it pretty clear that different people in Hollywood work in different ways. She says openly that she doesn't watch most of the movies shes in.. she attributes this to anxiety or whatever.. i don't know it sounds like making a movie needs to be collaborative effort and the best movies will be made by the actors who are actively invested in the outcome of the end product and willing to express that by reviewing and providing input.. But at the same time, in many positions, that is not the actors role. They are a medium that the writer, producer, director, should manipulate to their desired end. The actor really shouldn't be the one reviewing film and saying "that could be re-written, that pause is too long, change that camera angle, that cgi looks cheesey" etc. Unless they're getting writing/producer credits.. If you go out to eat and the food gets to you cold, did the chef send it cold? or did the expediter leave it on the tray too long before bringing it out? who messed up? Did the dishwasher make your food cold?
>She's yet to be in a good movie afaik
not her problem, shes a millionaire and she doesn't work to make pristine art solely for your enjoyment. SHe works to pay the bills and if she gets to make good art as a consequence, that would probably make her very happy.. But working actors don't have the privilege to wait for the perfect project.
The past couple of years has been a huge humiliation for all of Hollywood. It seems to be ramping up at the height of DEI.
audiences need to do better
the fact is movies are still as good as ever, but large swathes of the movie-going public are being brainwashed by right-wing grifters
We just need to re-brainwash them. Democrats need to do better.
this but unironically
all these morons who think they're going to be cranking out great shit with ai will just produce worthless slop
The truth is I have more hope for independent incels making AI clips than I do Hollywood. And don't for a second think Hollywood isn't chomping at the bit to get into AI.
Hollywood does it for money while the incels do it for passion.
I'm looking forward to fans "fixing" hollywood slop with AI, mostly just for the seething it will cause
I'm just hoping for really sick porn.
Both corporate and incels are after market share. Why'd either of them be averse to slop?
If they are given the same tools to work with I would place my bet on incel autists over Hollywood.
Hollywood only wants a certain amount of hours put in so the budget doesn't get too high.
Incels won't stop perfecting until they are satisfied.
It's champing at the bit you fricking moron.
As opposed to hollywood?
TV director fricked up on her first film. Not the agency's fault.
her,
there it is
woman moment
She publicly states she never hung out with her other female cast from Madame Web on or off screen during filming or after filming
She has publicly/interviews stated she hasn't seen the final public cut of Madame Webb at all, didn't even stick around premieres to watch it either
Openly stated to public/interviews it was connected to SonyVerse Spider-Man Universe and would be connected to MCU in some form THEN majorly back steps after Madame Webb public release saying publicly/interviews that Madame Webb is a Stand Alone Sorry/Film
She states publicly/interviews she is willing to do Madame Webb Sequels
Madame Webb is currently projected to only make 25million during opening week on a 80million budget
People are literally walking out of theaters while film is still playing or putting vids up laughing their asses off cause of how horribly bad it is and edited after watching the whole movie.
Sony has no clue what they're doing with their Sony Comic Cinematic Universe of Spider-Man characters they hold the rights too
i am shocked that gurl spider man failed. shocked i tell you!
>Sony has no clue what they're doing with their Sony Comic Cinematic Universe of Spider-Man characters they hold the rights too
They should make movies based on those properties people actually want to watch. Not this AI-written shit or whatever the frick took over Hollywood in the past 4 years.
>Not this AI-written shit or whatever the frick
don't give them the leeway to say "oh actually this was a test run of AI"
real people sat down and wrote this fricking awful dreck and they should be held accountable
Oh I agree, but it just points to how ESG itself flattens a curve creatively that should not be flattened, less it reduces the thrill of the curve creatively. Safe never made for good art.
nepotism and late stage capitalism, more specifically, being cheap as to hire cheap directors and writers than risk new ones who may lose you money is why hollywood is failing, not ai or "wokeness" there wasn't anything "woke" in the movie
Female leads = woke leftie keep up. Two of them are even colored
In other words, they're creating art through filters and with bumpers. A paint by numbers isn't a work of art, and this has been the driving force of film (and arguably, the creative arts in general) for the past 5 years or so. Appeal to everybody and you appeal to nobody. Movies shouldn't be a market-tested laundry detergent commercial, yet here we are.
>Not this AI-written shit or whatever the frick took over Hollywood in the past 4 years
Don't blame AI for ESCG Blackrock diversity requirements.
But this shit is so egregious that it's likely an op of some kind to get SONY (Japan) to sell off the Spidey rights to ~~*Disney*~~. The way Blackrock funding works is to make valuable IPs toxic to audiences for a while so they can be purchased or claimed through debt-settlement by a single entity (Blackrock will eventually change it's name to "Entert-AI-nmentcorp" or some shit) then remove all wokery, supply AI tech for cheap and turn entertainment/content itself into a subscription/fee-for-use model where if you want your home AI to make a Star Wars or Mickey Mouse or He-Man movie with elements borrowed from each, you get hit with a small fee for each element used. And if you upload it, they either get all or most proceeds from views and possibly own any incidental innovations made in your personal mash-up that a large audience suddenly takes a shine to (allowing them to further license a specific sub-genre of mash-up as a "Hot Trend"). After ten year of this they will essentially own every possibly permutation of currently extant IPs and any newly emerging ones.
They're specifically targeting SONY like this (that nutty israelite ceo chick will be working for her tribe in this, not her SONY bosses in Japan) because SONY got ripped off hard by HW israelite scams back in the 80s and now hang onto their properties like grim death. So the israelites are now trying to make Spiderverse movies toxic af in the hopes SONY will sell them off to one of Blackrock's investment tentacles.
Dakota Johnson will be getting a big (hidden) payday to play this part of the "disgusted" star. All these influencers making meme videos are doing for the fake trending not the reality. If you think idiots like that have any sense of what is and isn't a good movie, just browse their timelines and posting history to see where their taste truly is.
perhaps the most logical post i've seen on this whole debacle so far
she is acting way too cool for it to actually be a flop
i think they're setting her up for something very big.
Publicly stated she loved limes then throws limes under the bus
Fricking b***h.
wow what the frick, I hate her now
What a non-lime loving c**t.
probably a lemon-stealing prostitute though
Frick you Dakota PR team, you think I don't know this whole pretend to like limes then admit to lying thing was organic? You're not going to get me to like her with cheap tricks like that.
On the other hand, some more tasteful footkino might do the trick
Limebros...
NOOOOOOOOOO
>Madame Webb is currently projected to only make 25million during opening week
It's probably not even going to do. It's Friday was 4.3mil. Morbius did 17.3
Well it was Morbum time then.
They
>have a bunch of really attractive actresses, one of which is currently the most talked about woman in hollywood
>don't just do sexy 12A spiderman and earn a billion dollars
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Cinemaphile should have written the script and designed the costumes
a Hard R spider-man movie?
>Openly stated to public/interviews it was connected to SonyVerse Spider-Man Universe and would be connected to MCU in some form
Source?
Just look around YouTube, TikTok, and use GoogleFu anon
>She publicly states she never hung out with her other female cast from Madame Web on or off screen during filming or after filming
That's because zoomerettes are only fun to look at, and not actually fun to interact with.
>Madame Webb is currently projected to only make 25million during opening week on a 80million budget
Won't be even close, see
This director is new, no previous experience on film and only a canceled failed project of a series.
> there wasn't anything "woke" in the movie
LMAO the very concept of a full assemble of female superheroes carrying the film is woke in and of itself. Women don't care about capeshit unless it has atractive, shirtless male leads and/or their bfs/husbands drag them to the movies in the first place. Men don't care about female leads in general unless they spend most of the movie half naked or on tight spandex shoving their breasts and asses on the screen. Instead they keep making these borefests aimed at an imaginary queer feminist audience.
Anon
is right, they wasted their entire cast (including a lead whose entire career revolves around getting naked on screen) on a movie that no one could possibly give a frick about.
>takes money
>gets mad after
women are funny every time
It's painfully clear now that people just don't want to see female led superhero films. Captain Marvel was carried hard by Endgame hyp. The sequel being a giant flop proves it
They know this. They just don’t want it to be true and will keep forcing it regardless of facts.
It makes it even more crazy given the fact that they knew full well what happened to the comic book industry once they shoehorned in the the race, LBGTQ+, and feminist ideology.
No superhero fan wants to be lectured to when they consume superhero stories.
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
They refuse to make them sexy and appeal to the male gaze, which was a major factor in their popularity. Hoe you adapt an explicitly visual medium to film but strip away the actual visual assets that drew fans in the first place is the most tone-deaf take possible, but encouraged due to (modern values). We live in an era of OnlyFans amateur porn stars being encouraged, open sexuality being encouraged, but a new Puritan filter applied to all major media outlets. It's fricking crazy.
Captain Marvel was carried by Jude law and SLJ
lads...
this is not OK
I know. I'm shaking right now.
Hot.
holy shit I've never been so uncomfortable in my life. Has she been confronted about this!!!???
You kidding? I'm a Dakotagay and nobody has even posted the time she sexually harassed an interviewer. She's a troll. Or a real evil person. Love her either way.
she has to be held accountable, by my dick
online, when people say someone in hollywood is "evil" it usually means they're probably a decent person IRL
the people who have things to hide put on a fake nice PR persona, it's schizos like her who act out that aren't hiding anything
dear frick
what the frick is wrong with her
It was silly but it has some heart to it. I’d say 7/10
Frick off moron.
>heh let's keep making terrible films that bomb
Bold strategy Hollywood, let's see how it works out.
I think it's the title
>"Captain" Marvel brings in the manchildren
>"Madame" Web repels them
You're probably right
i'm starting to like her, she's kinda weird, gives me Pattinson vibes, starts career with shitty movies but is actually based
She could make 20x as much money by doing JOI videos on OF.
Hate him all you want but Zaslav was right to write off Batgirl. All evidence supports his decision
Imagine spending like $100 mil to make a capeshit movie and the footage looks like a cheap WB show from 2009.
Cavill did the same thing
Every fricking interview i see with Dakota Johnson in it it seems she has absolute no toughts at all, just an airhead, a NPC
And EVERY fricking movie she is just bland as hell, she is just there to show a pretty face.
No wonder she is a literal NepoBaby
movie was clearly made just so they can keep the rights
Those email leaks confirmed they had that mentality with peripheral Spiderman projects ages ago but did it ever occur to them to actually make good movies while retaining the rights?
i watched the HDTS and got bored after 10 minutes
WHAT WAS SHE THINKING?!
Didn't happen, yet you keep saying it. What kind of illness is that?
Actually, it literally did, and the fact that you can't figure this out for yourself leads me to wonder, what kind of moronation is that?