For a Batman movie this movie has Zero impact
and is not Culturally Relevant anymore even Doctor Strange and Thor 4 are more relevant than this trash movie what went wrong? Batman is the biggest DC Super Hero how could this movie be forgotten so quickly?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It was a very bad movie. Mat Reeves is a shitty director. Never before have I been so sure someone has a 100 IQ than him
He's a hack just like Villeneuve, difference is that we kept Blade Runner 2049 relevant because of memes and because of Ryan Gosling.
I personally liked Battinson way more than Batfleck
Here is your reply, wouldn’t expect redditors to get Batman, he’s not literally you
paul dano saved it and made it a classic.
Too long, unfocused, gay trash pop politics forced in. I still liked it for the most part, but I can see how some people didn't. Just please for the love of God don't go the MCU route.
It was bad and stupid, but worse than that it was too long, unoriginal, and boring. Being boring is the death of any movie.
Didn't watch but it seems like for the most part they just tried to copy Nolan and make it slightly woke
The Northman had zero cultural impact as well and I loved it. You need to grow up and stop caring about zoomer memes.
>Thor 4
is about to fall short of this movie by like 70 million dollars domestically
Relax
It made Nirvana relevant for Zoomers
>this movie has Zero impact and is not Culturally Relevant anymore
I just don’t understand how you quantify these things
>how could this movie be forgotten so quickly?
Who exactly has forgotten this movie? Yeah it’s been out of cinemas most places for a couple months so the discussion surrounding it has died down. That happens with all movies. It was a critical and commercial success and work on a sequel is already in development. Frankly it blows any other Batman movie out of the fricking water, especially anything that Jack Nolan produced imo
capeshit has no impact as a whole so stop watching it if you're expecting memorable movies
every character was over acted, humorless, and gray. the movie was colorless. it was a lot like nolan's trilogy so it was unoriginal. every version of batman has been done on the big screen now... except batman beyond directed by villeneuve
God that would be kino
>batman beyond directed by villeneuve
DC won't take risk with batman they will just keep making the same boring crap now they have a formula. They're afraid have a robin movie, which makes 0 sense since Kick-ass showed us kids can be badass(with the right actor).
>forgotten
Literally what do you dorks mean by this when you make these threads? If people aren't talking about some movie that came out months ago non-stop it's "forgotten"? There were constantly daily threads for like weeks after it came out, what do you want?
It's only Cinemaphile where this is hated
No, a lot of people dislike it on social media.
Oh yeah and all it's audience ratings are in the toilet, right? You're full of shit
A lot of people dislike a lot of things on social media. Was that supposed to be some kind of addition to the discussion?
It disproves your statement that only this particular board dislike it.
it wasn't my statement and your attempts to add to the discussion are aggressively uninteresting.
I find your retort to be quite shallow and pedantic.
Not really. Most people seem to like it a a lot, very highly rated on IMDB and Letterboxd
You gonna make this same thread every frickin day c**t?
have a nice day homosexual
Capeshit is not culture
>Doctor Strange and Thor 4 are more relevant than this trash movie
What?
only for the next two weeks until the next MCU goyslop gets released.
It's very relevant as it targets the very real and obvious idea that Batman is a useless idiot who beats up low level criminals but is infective against the corruption holding Gotham back.
That sounds like a Twitter/Reddit hot take. What next? Batman should hang up his cowl and donate all his money?
No, that's the point of the movie, Batman realizes this and becomes than cringey vengeance. The Riddler actually did more to remove corruption by targeting the police, mayor, all the important people running Gotham. You think Batman is going to accomplish his goal of avenging his parents deaths by simply beating up kids like he does in the beginning of the movie? Pay attention next time.
*becomes MORE than cringey vengeance
He becomes a symbol of hope as cliche as that sounds.
God, this movie was so fricking dumb. I liked how the DA kept walking around without any bodyguards despite fearing for his life.
Everyone is under his payroll, the only thing he has to fear is some Cinemaphile idiot like the Riddler. Weren't you paying attention?
>the only thing he has to fear is some Cinemaphile idiot like the Riddler
The same guy he was afraid of, thinking he was next in line. So why not walk around with a few bodyguards? In real life if something like that happened, where the mayor and chief of police is assassinated by a serial killer, everyone working for the city would be under protection.
But the DA guy needed to be stupid for plot convenience, otherwise the Riddler wouldn't be able to easily catch him alone.
You know maybe you're right or wrong as I am, I'd like to think Matt Reeves put the answer there or maybe he didn't and maybe the movie isn't as good as I it think it is. Either way, I appreciate this movie a ton for at least trying to deal with deep issues with the character in film format. As others have states, this movies doesn't do anything groundbreaking as there's other media that deals with it but for sure nothing like it has been seen in the movie space.
The movie is a poor copy of Se7en, but dumber. It's also another grounded Batman exactly the same Christopher Nolan did, but without any charm. It's also edgy and long as frick like a Zack Snyder movie, but with any meme worthy scenes.
The movie is the definition of a soulless remake.
It is. It's some moronic idea that forgets Batman has super villains to deal with and targets organized crime and not Tyrone stealing a pair of Nike's
Those super villain's, sans the Joker, all have motives for their crimes, Mr. Freeze for example does all he does for his near wife. There's all sorts of stories from comics to the animated series that deals with this but if Batman were to find a truly satisfyingly conclusion that resolves Freeze's issues and prevent him from committing more crime he'd stop being a character in his rogues gallery.
>Meanwhile In Batman Year one
>year two the corruption persists
masterpiece
only true batman like muh comics
first detective bartman
I just wasnt very good. Move on.
It was a good movie. Move on.
>For a Batman movie this movie has Zero impact
and is not Culturally Relevant
Good. I hope Batman stays that way. I want Reeves to continue making kino Batman films the way he wants instead of studios demanding he cater to the demographics and implementing their bullshit ideas, like they did to Burton.
>I want Reeves to continue making kino Batman films the way he wants instead of studios demanding
This has the studios hands all over it. It's just a soulless redo of everything that has been done before. Even the three hour runtime is the studio trying to rectify what they had done to BvS theatrical release.
It seems like they copied some aspects of the Christopher Nolan batman
>how could this movie be forgotten so quickly?
It was a middling organized crime film, which was the only compelling part of the plot aside the family history stuff woven into it. The rest is on the nose 'social commentary' that Joe Blow is watching capeshit to get away from delivering meat exposition puppet tv new prompter tier lines. It's just ok as a film, and not great as entertainment.
>This has the studios hands all over it
Wouldn't doubt it. Even established war horses like Ridley Scott get fricked on final cut watch Dune and tell me that Fox forcing rookie Lindelhof on him & Spaight's Prometheus script wasn't a mistake, or nepotism
>Film got hard carried by the production design, everything else is either dogshit or derivative dogshit.
You're pretty good
there was something in the way
It did nothing new or original with the Batman brand that hasn’t been done before.
FALSE.
dishonest post.
it was fricking 3 hours long, it took them 3 hours to tell a story that uninteresting
smells like curry ITT
Yeah. The stink comes from all the pajeets defending this shitty ass movie.
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/image/MAsp4MVZV3qPmu5oeN1-nQ/
Cry harder, pajeet.
I'm white
Why does this movie make you so mad you have posted that image 55 times?
Because i like to shit on shit-skins, specially self-hating shit-skins.
Now stop pretending to be white, Raj.
it's the obsessed snydergay
somebody pointed out that snyder cut was huge with the pajeets (objectively true) so the snydergays started spamming this shit to deflect any stuff with muh snyder.
what's your mother cooking?
It was three hours too long. At the very least they could have cut the last act with the flood.
That's because it was a piece of shit.
its forgettable garbage. nothing whatsoever is memorable. uninspired trash
Btw the main reason people here hate this movie is because it hits too close to home. Instead of reflecting and introspection, anons bash at this movie as they rightly see the Riddler, the villian of the movie. who aggrandizes unto himself the prerogative of life and death but at least gives Batman a valuable lesson, as something all too similar.
It’s about 45 minutes too long and they ruined it by adding unnecessary female characters which slowed down the pacing to a painful crawl.
It doesn't have any funny lines unlike the Nolan movies
It was never that good in the first place. Reddit movie.
It was made specifically for midwits.
Really sucks they wasted so much time and money on this mid movie when they could have just continued the Snyderverse.
I would've paid them not to.
>even Doctor Strange and Thor 4 are more relevant than this trash movie what went wrong? Batman is the biggest DC Super Hero how could this movie be forgotten so quickly?
they wanted to cry about corruption, white privilege, and police brutality where the punishment for all those things is ultimately unleashed on moronic Cinemaphileners, instead of making a film with universal and timeless themes, which is what Nolan did with his films and why they're still resonant to this day.
>BROOOO IT'S LE DARK DETECTIVE STORY BRO
>BRO WHAT IF BATMAN BUT LE FINCHER
>WHAT IF RIDDLER BUT LE SESEVENEN??
meanwhile in the actual film, Batman didn't even bother to check the angles on the photographs of the iceburg lounge showing all of Riddler's targets, which would have led him straight to the apartment right from the start. Film got hard carried by the production design, everything else is either dogshit or derivative dogshit.
>carried
this implies it actually succeeded
This feels like Britain
It's not
>>WHAT IF RIDDLER BUT LE SESEVENEN??
More like
>WHAT IF RIDDLER BUT HE IS AN INCEL
Was there supposed to be a mystery for Batguy to solve? Everything seemed totally obvious
>Zero impact
OPEN YOUR EYEEEEEEES
Nah, it was kino
no one wanted a neo-noir batman no one.
Was this shit a neo-noir unironically? Because i can't see it. Seemed more like a boring thriller.
I mean, the Dark Knight is a noir film.
How?
>"The biggest thing about noir is moral ambiguity, characters who are not easy to pin down — who is good, who is evil,” said "Dark Knight” director Christopher Nolan, referring to the genre and his own film. "In the greatest film noir there is this continuing pressure being put on the character, and I was looking back to a film like (the 1944 classic) ‘Double Indemnity.' There is a spiraling sense of doom in these films, the characters are under pressure, and you see how they react.”
How the frick 'how'? The Dark Knight is a big homage to Heat, from Michael Mann. Mann does nothing but neo noir movies.
I did.
Implying noir is a genre
eat shit Black person homosexual
kys Black person israelite
>according to my cultural relevance meter...
>imaginary people in my head probably liked Thor 4 more
alright
I really liked this movie but it had zero meme potential because it was just a pretty straightforward Batman movie. These days memes make dreams and everything else is left in the dust.
>Le evil orange man shooters!
>save us batman from Jan 6th!!
>zero cultural impact
It briefly revived the Arkham games and had a bunch of memes, more than any mcu movie in the last months
literally the best depiction of Batman.
I just want to jerk off watching a latex mother Talon on the Big screen.
how obsessed are you? I don't hear about any capeshit movies after a month of release except for the older ones.
Because Nolan already did this in begins with a better cast as well. If this came out in 2005 then it would have cultural impact.
Del Toro's Batman vs. Man-Bat: It's Battening when?
Dc is a massive pile of failure