FOR THE LOVE OF GOD JUST FRICKING WATCH OUR MOVIE ALREADY
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
FOR THE LOVE OF GOD JUST FRICKING WATCH OUR MOVIE ALREADY
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Pixar cannot wrap their heads around one of their movies being a flop.
>make all the characters unlikable and boring
>make the plot boring
>ruin zurg
how could this happen?
Haven't their last 5 or 6 movies been straight to streaming flops that everyone immediately forgot?
coco is the last non-sequel to make a profit.
Also their last decent movie. Actually Soul was fine but nothing special really. That movie Luca sucked balls.
Luca was better than the three movies you just listed. Coco was the worst.
It started with Cars.
Like Jack Reacher, I don't look back.
Cars was a massive hit though
Considering I can't name a single one of them except now Lightyear, yes?
Yeah, Coco was (surprisingly) good but every else has either been shit, or "okay, but not Pixar levels of good"
Coco was good except for the fact that they tried to cut out Christianity from a culture that is deeply tied to it. I'm not even offended by this but it does make it feel like something is missing from how Mexico is represented in the film
I thought the Mex were catholics.
They are
what
Pixar has been a Disney slave studio for well over a decade, they don't care. They've already been relegated to Disney+. Disney might care a little so they run these pathetic shills
Who cares the last good Pixar film was WALL-E, conceived well before the buyout. TS3 manchildren need not respond defending their saccharin tearbait
I think they legitimately are completely disconnected from reality and are just completely moronic. They genuinely don't understand why taking the whole star command cartoon they had and turning it into a more 'realistic' boring origin stories movie while for no reason at all cutting off the beloved voice actor of the character for over a decade.
The fact nobody has interest in this bullshit at all really puzzles pixar/disney.
>onward
meh.
>soul
more meh
>luca
complete flop
>turning red
awful.
none of these made profit at the box office either, it was near impossible during the coof. especially when its not something like spiderman where the chinks / south americans without restrictions will still go see it.
also the last good pixar flick was incredibles 2
>advertising your product... LE BAD!!!
grow up
HAHAHAHA SUCK IT, homosexualS!!!!!!
Based or not based?
wholesome
>Expect payoff with it being ok or some crap
>Nah, little kid saying fear allah, disney is really the message
Laffed, very based
Teaching kids to be homophobic, so wholesome!!
/s
>NOOOOOOO YOU HAVE TO LET ME GROOM YOUR CHILDREN IM GOING INSANE
Not just wholesome. Wholesome 100
no one is scared of gays unless they are following a child into the bathroom.
Yes. You will never frick my kid.
>People falling for this
>not realising it's one of the comments off the video
yes
they don't need to be taught to be homophobic though. they do it naturally. what's that tell you?
Tells me that you are full of shit because it's the exact opposite that happens with children so that proves it's a learned response and not innate, moron.
uh huh and thats why kids already giggled and said ew whenever anyone kissed but gays just had to yell at them for being homophobes for giggling at two boys kissing
What are you even trying to argue? Underdeveloped kids being awkward about pda doesn't mean homophobia is fricking innate, so what are you on about?
lol you are stupid. and gays have to PUUUUSSSHHH when they really dont need to. kids will giggle and laugh at all shit, but gays and even over religious people jsut need to push shit sometimes and I hate them for it.
Im the same person I was years ago when Christians were banning DnD and music. now the homosexuals are doing to because my hurt feelings.
No one is gay dragging them on mass and when they do it get harshest punishment.
so much so that gays are higher tiered than blacks so if its a black on gay crime the black goes under rather than gay.
Trust me I see this in TV and movies all the time it really was occupy that made them push it to get us to look away from the class divide but I blame the people watching tv for falling for it.
How can we get to socially accepted pedophilia but skip gay rights?
I didn't read your seething blog post, Ahmed.
cause you know im right Inshallah
Is this just peak summer hours in Baghdad or some shit? When does school start back up for you?
lmfao you are the summer child fricking moron
>Cinemaphile is my local Muslim message board to cry about gays and praise Allah
>on television and film
lol anons started it I just finished it and go cry on reddit homosexual about how gays aren't accepted on Cinemaphile
>gays aren't accepted on Cinemaphile
there is an entire board dedicating to jerking off to them, Muhammad. Where do you think we fricking are? Your Mosque?
hahahahah and go there and see what half the threads are talking about. you are a fricking summer tourist and you can frick right off
>literal election tourist in between reeeing about gays is telling anyone else how board culture is
>also praise Allah!
Just permaban and IP from the ME at this point, Christ Almighty are you people insufferable.
you are fricking moronic and assuming shit which is what is funnier shut the frick up ive been here longer than you have and it's clearly showing by the moral gayging you keep shitting on about.
go the frick back you are cancer
>I've been here longer, also praise Allah and AHHHH homosexualS EXIST I'M LITERALLY GOING INSANE AHHH
allahu snack bar Black person maybe youll find the almighty one day
Imagine coming to fricking Cinemaphile, of all places, to moral post about your prophet Muhammad and Allah. Imagine, just imagine.
imagine believing any of it for a second when im a white woman from the midwest hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahha
this is how I know you are a summer underage child. go to bed sweaty
>I'm merely pretending to be Islamic
Cool? I'm not sure what you get out of all this, it's just nonsense behavior on an anime porn site.
you replied and I wasted your time seething this entire time
ever heard of a dopamine rush haha your a loser
kek oh wow you really are pathetic. You can't be older than 18.
hahaha ok buddy whatever helps you not cry more
anon... he literally just said inshallah and posted a Muslim guy and you automatically assumed he was.
you kind are moronic and maybe even racist. just plain naive at least if that's all it takes. can i have your credit care number I work for Nintendo. see I'm Asian
>entire shit thread is about killing gays and crying about gays and how they should be eradicated
>"woah bro, I'm just like being ironic in Minecraft and heh you fell for me pretending to be Muslim, praise Allah"
It's so bizzare, you have an entire board for this thought salad.
anon you are just coping now for being so easily fooled and you know it. fricking no shame in you
inshallaha surhah god be with you and peace be upon you and frick the gays and child brides for everyone
Muslims love fricking kids though
They marry them for life. Not just go around grooming kids and molesting as many as possible like gays do. On that note, muslims love to execute gays.
So I can frick kids so long as I marry them? Fricking sweet, sign me up
>sign me up
Convert to Islam and move to an Islamic country. You won't though.
incels will simultaneously rage over TCAP while posting "the 100 year old anime sorceress" and cry about gays grooming kids.
Kids don't need to be taught that. It's a natural instinct, a reflex.
Okay groomer.
>/s
I hope you get trampled by a hippo
Based! Call out homophobia wherever you see it.
Edit: Thanks for the gold kind stranger
Edit 2: 327 upvotes for this? Haha wow that's the most I've ever gotten, thanks guys and gals and everything in between!
Edit 3: WTF 600 upvotes wow thank you all so much this is the best cakeday ever
Edit 4: Thanks for all the cakeday wishes fellow r/wooooshers. I tippeth mine hat to thee on this pleasant morrow.
Edit 5: Ok, so this went viral overnight for some reason O_o 2000 motherflipping upboats I really have no words thank you all so much it means a lot!
Edit 6: ok Im noticing some toxic discussion happening in this reply chain and I feel the need to address it. Sexism and racism are not cool guys, so please cool it and continue the good vibes please and thank you! Amen and Awomen!
Edit 7: ok so I don't know why but I've received a lot of downvotes on this post recently, maybe i got raided by Cinemaphile.com/b?? (commonly referred to as the "butthole of the internet" for those who aren't aware). I don't really ask for much but I was hoping we could show those losers a thing or two, so please give this post an upvote if you haven't already, it would mean the world to me and show these bullies you cannot mess with a good person.
Edit 8: turns out my girlfriend cheated on me, so that happened :/
Edit 9: so people have been wanting me to clarify the previous edit. I don't have the energy to go into a lot of detail so the general gist of it is this: Yes we were in an open relationship, no that doesn't mean you can't cheat on someone when you're in an open relationship. If you are having sex regularly with someone and never mention it until they get you pregnant, that is definitely a betrayal of trust even if you've both agreed that she can have as many partners as she feels she needs to be comfortable.
Edit 10: FYI, taking responsibility for the child does not make me any less of a man than you, actually it makes me more, so kindly frick off please and thank you!
Lel
Other way around dude. People naturally find homosexuality disgusting. Which of course it is, it's completely antithetical to procreation and spreads disease.
Without modern medicine, there would be no homosexuality. Do you have any idea how many more diseases are spread by gays that straights?
It takes heavy propaganda in order to get people to "tolerate" it.
>gays didn't exist before modern medicine
In far fewer numbers. Like...what don't you get about this? If you partake in an activity which raises your mortality rate due to disease burden, and don't have offspring, whatever genetics cause you to be gay, die out.
In the past gays were in the closet all their life due to social stigma and religiosity in society. You had gays getting married to women and having kids. In a way, social stigma and religion kept gays in existence. Now without religion or social stigma, you have them out in the open and partaking in the gay lifestyle, which naturally comes with tons of disease.
The generation that we see now that's alive, is going to be it for gays. They won't exist anymore after they die, because whatever genetic combination that results in gays, will be gone. The only gays left will be those who got molested at a young age by the older gay men.
>what don't you get about this?
How astronomically fricking stupid it all sounds to make that type of claim in reality?
How about telling me where Im wrong you moron. You think a magical fairy comes down from the sky and makes you gay? It's genetics. In the past gay people still got married and had kids, and passed on those genes. Modern gays don't do that, thus, no genes to pass on.
>gays didn't exist before modern medicine
>gays are passing off "being gay" genes to children with their beard wives
>>gays didn't exist before modern medicine
Cool strawman but I never said that.
And yeah, genes. Do you not believe in evolution? Or do you not understand how it works?
If religion caused short people to always get wives, and have kids, those genetics for short people would be passed on to the next generation. If religion was abolished, and women could choose not to get with short men, then those short guys wouldn't propagate their genes, and it would result in the future generation being taller. That's how genes and evolution works. There are no gay men who have to pretend to be straight, have wives, and have kids. They can freely now be genetic dead ends.
You literally said they only exist because of modern medicine which implies...they didn't exist before it, are you moronic?
Do you truly believe gays breed other gays? Are you doing a bit?
>You literally said they only exist because of modern medicine which implies...they didn't exist before it, are you moronic?
No buddy that's exactly what YOU said to my post, not what I said.
Go back and read what I said. I said "there would be no homosexuality without modern medicine". There is zero implication in that sentence that says gays didn't exist before.
Atleast TRY to have a honest conversation.
Where do you think gays come from? Magic? It's genes.
ESL moron, that literally implies that the only thing keeping homosexuals from not existing IS modern medicine, which means they didn't without it. Do you understand the things you type you dumb understand homosexual?
*underage
>that literally implies that the only thing keeping homosexuals from not existing IS modern medicine, which means they didn't without it.
I can see how you could make that implication to what I said, but that implication makes zero sense when combined with the context of what what I already talked about concerning gays being married to women in the past.
Let me put it another way: Modern medicine allows homosexuality to thrive. Without modern medicine, it's not possible for homosexuality to thrive. Without modern medicine, Aids would have taken out most gays.
>Without modern medicine, it's not possible for homosexuality to thrive.
...which continues to be a hilariously stupid statement to make when gays have existed for literal thousands of fricking years.
I said thrive, not exist. Im sure there were an extremely few amount of gays around. It doesn't really make any sense for gays to be around in any sort of numbers bigger than what we'd see with other extreme genetic abnormalities which cause a serious defect in their ability to reproduce. We certainly see next to zero exclusive homosexuality in the animal kingdom (if there is, it's mostly incidental homosexuality, ie. bisexuality).
>extremely few
Absolutely sending my sides into orbit holy shit, what rock have you lived under during the entire development of the human fricking species?
There is no development of the human species with a significant gay population. Do you understand the sheer amount of disease that's spread through anal sex? It's not possible for a healthy society to have a significant portion of it's population fricking eachother in the ass without widespread disease.
>There is no development of the human species with a significant gay population.
Fricking kek, you have literally no concept of human history and how messy the entire story of human development has been for the last few hundred thousand years, it's wholesome almost with how naive you are.
>uhmm aksully everyone was gay!!
Holy cope.
Gays or people just fricking their same sex has been a thing written about and talked about and in society since we discovered fricking fire, Ahmed.
>it existed at all
>therefore it was wildly prevalent and everyone did it!
moron.
Yeah nobody is saying that strawman, moron. I'm saying you are clearly and purposefully lying about gays existing. Weird that is, wonder what the reason for that narrative is?
>lying about gays existing
The post you quoted did not say that, you 65 IQ homosexual.
How were there gays everywhere without massive amounts of diseases gotten from fricking eachother in the ass? Did bacteria not exist back then?
It's almost as if they still existed and got sick or died at largely the same rates and you are literally parroting propaganda to pretend that history, the hundreds of thousands of years of history, just didn't have gays until the last few centuries and particularly when you were born and getting "news" from your alt talking heads?
Significant gay populations have always been in collapsing civilisations, moron. You are a human disease.
>muh collapsing civilizations meme
Neuroscientists and biologists actually all agree that people are far less heteronormative than we pretend they are and that cultural impacts repress base sexual drives in our species.
>Neuroscientists and biologists actually all agree
Lmao, all I needed to read to know you were a Reddit brainlet playing the MUH SCIENCE-card.
Your point was unecessary but further sealed that conclusion.
Ah yes, those woke nueroscientists over on reddit.
No, neuroscientists and biologists actually all agree that cultural impacts encourage people to be far more homosexual than they naturally are.
Also there is more than one human species, and biologists and physical anthropologists all agree on that too.
I'm talking about the AI and xeno scientists studying us from orbit of course. Humans aren't ready for this yet.
>No, neuroscientists and biologists actually all agree that cultural impacts encourage people to be far more homosexual than they naturally are.
No.
Wooooah are you trying to make a genetic-biological determinism argument? That's racist! Blacks are only like they are because of culture, not from evolving separately.
>No, neuroscientists and biologists actually all agree that cultural impacts encourage people to be far more homosexual than they naturally are.
I agree but the genetic seeds must still be planted for that behaviour to take place. I have ZERO inclination to take a guys dick. No amount of cultural impact will change that Im disgusted at the idea of fricking a dude.
> No amount of cultural impact will change that Im disgusted at the idea of fricking a dude.
If you were repeatedly raped by a big hairy man at age 5 onward like many homosexuals have been you have no idea WHAT you'd be ckinef towards.
Literally nothing backs this groom maymay up. You don't become the opposite attraction if you were raped.
>this groom maymay
Yeah, the irl Goebbels "study" the Nazis did on gays grooming children is an unfounded meme that has somehow carried its way into Stormfront talking points 70 years later.
I mean you say that but I know a gay person in real life who was raped at a young age. I know anyone can make anything up on the internet but I swear to you, on the life of my whole family and some of my pets, that I am telling the truth.
You mean aside from 47% of homosexuals admitting to having been molested as a child by an adult male?
You mean aside from gays being 1.5% of the population, but more than a third of the child-molestors?
You're quoting the story run by a Christian church, yeah?
Wonder if there's any bias in that robust sample size of *checks notes* 10...
>NOOOOO, WHEN I SAID "TRUST THE SCIENCE" I DIDN'T MEAN THE SCIENCE I DIDN'T LIKE THAT FINDS CONCLUSIONS I DON'T LIKE!!! IF SCIENCE PRODUCES A CONUSION THAT IS A HECKIN' WRONGTHINK IT IS LE PROPAGANDA!!!
Some MSPaint shit you saw on pol isn't "science", kiddo. I'd love to see the nonpartisan study done to reach a conclusion that almost 50 percent of all gays were molested.
>Some MSPaint shit you saw on pol isn't "science", kiddo.
That's not where that comes from, it comes from consistent results of voluntary studies and surveys.
While on the topic of what isn't "science", neither is Kinsey molesting literal infants and using the fact that it made them cry to conclude "lol we're all gay actually".
Citation needed and citation needed.
>You're quoting the story run by a Christian church, yeah?
Lol no?
Nice baseless assumption to dismiss results you don't like, shit-fricker.
Can you hurry up asnd die of an easily preventable disease already?
You going to post this bombshell data or....you just waiting for the thread to archive?
>47 percent of gays have been molested because I heard this once on /misc/
do you morons even bother to look up the literal propaganda you consume?
Lol Reddit's gay board had a thread on "your first sexual experience" and it was literally all current gays admitting they got ass-fricked by a man at age 8 or 9 or some shit. The mods has to fricking lock it from further posts because it was """harming the social conversation""", kek.
>I saw it on reddit
Woah, that's basically a scientific fact then!
He wasn't stating a "scientific fact", troony. He was just giving an example of observable reality.
>everyone is troony
>I base my worldviews in things from reddit and Cinemaphile
have a nice day, gormless idiot.
Yeah, he should be getting it from CNN and his close friends from the hustling and bustling big city.
Why do you tourists always bring up CNN as if anyone is actually watching it?
There are still Leftist zombies that ACTUALLY still watch CNN.
Nobody cares about what news stations your boogeymen watch in your head.
Where do you get your information from then? If you're getting it "straight from the source" as it were, you should understand that academia is just one more part of the power structure.
I'm not about to explain to some moron on Cinemaphile where I get my news from.
Fine, MSNBC then. It's all the same garbage.
>We certainly see next to zero exclusive homosexuality in the animal kingdom
This is patently and pathologically false.
No, it's true. Look it up. Exclusive homosexuality in the animal kingdom is next to non existent. Incidental homosexuality takes up the vast majority of homosexuality. I know the data because I wrote a paper on the very subject when I was in uni.
You didn't write a paper on it because there are literally hundreds of mammals who engage in homosexual behavior and if you "looked it up" you'd know that. For fricks sake, Banobo apes literally engage in orgies with both male and females as a way of preventing infanticide. They are our direct cousins. Shut the frick up about science you don't know.
>You didn't write a paper on it because there are literally hundreds of mammals who engage in homosexual behavior and if you "looked it up" you'd know that.
Yup. Homosexual behaviour. Incidental homosexuality, like I said. Next to zero exclusive homosexuality.
Do you have a problem reading what I said? I literally said theres plenty of homosexuality. I said there is almost zero homosexuality. Then you write a post which is exactly what I just said, pretending like it's an argument against it. Frick.
AGAIN: ALMOST ZERO EXCLUSIVE HOMOSEXUALITY EXISTS IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM.
>an evolutionary trait to prevent infanticide within their tribe is "incidental"
It was literally a characteristic they developed to compete with how chimps would murder the offspring of betas from warring groups you astronomically fricking stupid moron. Over 200 mammalian species engage in homosexual behavior as either a evolutionary driven need or, your favorite term, "incidental" in the sense that they just don't moralgay on Cinemaphile about it.
>Over 200 mammalian species engage in homosexual behavior
"Homosexual behavior" of course meaning "some grads claim they saw a moron of the species get confused and try to frick a male it confused for a female, once".
>everyone studying biology is just lying
Ok again, I will for the third time explain to you that in the territorial struggles between bonobos and chimps, it was common for chimps (as they engage in infanticide among their own population groups) would kill bonobo offspring as well, to combat this and the markers in their own species for the same aggression, they developed an approach where no offspring actually knows who the father is. This springboarded into bonobos just fricking everything that moves, regardless of sex. This is not "incidental" sexual behavior, tard. This is a ln evolution-driven trait.
Didn't read.
"All" biologists don't agree on ANYTHING, much less you're pseudoscientific Reddit/Bill Nye talking-points of "lol actually we are ALL gay!!! Muh science!!! *sucks troony wiener*".
>This springboarded into bonobos just fricking everything that moves, regardless of sex
But that claim about bonobo's is a bunch of bullshit from people who looked at bonobo's in captivity rather than in the wild. Bonobo's in the wild do not display that behaviour.
https://skepticink.com/incredulous/2014/12/29/questioning-sexy-bonobo-hype-part-2-primatologist-responds-christopher-ryan/
I don't give a shit what some blog online says, there are literally thousands of actual scientific papers released on bonobos in the wild, it is very weird to be in denial about something so thoroughly understood.
Data sets from the wild clearly show that over the course of a year female bonobos do not copulate any more than female chimpanzees.
> there are literally thousands of actual scientific papers released on bonobos in the wild
Lol most of the big papers released about bonobo's sexual behaviour from the last 40 years are from less than 4 institutes. You have zero idea what you're talking about.
>reddit spacing
Go back
>Data sets from the wild clearly show that over the course of a year female bonobos do not copulate any more than female chimpanzees.
Lying is fun. That is false
>the studies are wrong because...because they are ok???
>Lying is fun. That is false
lol, uh, no. Data is pretty clear if you exclude data from in captivity.
Sure would love to see you data from actual peer reviewed sources and not a fricking incel skeptic blog.
>would love to see you data from actual peer reviewed sources
No.
I accept your concession than, Ivan.
>I accept your concession than, Ivan.
>literally won't post the "data" he was arguing about
>gets mad, does a "you look silly" post instead
Woah, is this the power of the Right guys?
...Why are you still supporting what I said? What part of "exclusive" homosexuality don't you get? You're literally arguing that they take place in homosexual BEHAVIOURS. Yes, they do. I never denied that. I said EXCLUSIVE homosexuality, like humans exhibit, doesn't really exist in the animal kingdom. You've said absolutely nothing that goes against that.
There are literally mammals that engage in exclusive homsoexual behavior though, no amount of your semantics changes that. You are begging with this "muh exclusivity" nonsense because you can't just accept that the homsoexual behavior happens, so instead it must be like they fell and slipped their monkey dicks jnto asses by accident or some goofy shit. It's so very bizzare to claim that it's "kinda gay but like not really bro" like a teenager trying to justify jerking it to a trap. It's just gay, you codifying it as being less authentic because it's a "behavior" doesn't make any logical fricking sense.
>There are literally mammals that engage in exclusive homsoexual behavior though
Literally flies in the face of Darwinism.
Literally does not.
So does your imaginary second X Chromosome, troony. Your opinion is irrelevant. Shut up and know your place.
>There are literally mammals that engage in exclusive homsoexual behavior though,
No. There's not. Sorry, but it's not true. I believe theres 2 recorded cases in history, which is extraordinarily rare and puts it in line with extremely rare diseases.
>"You are begging with this "muh exclusivity" nonsense because you can't just accept that the homsoexual behavior happens"
Still inferring and making stawmen out of what Im saying rather that listening to what Im saying. Stop having an emotional reaction to what I say. It clouds your ability to think.
Theres a clear difference between exclusively homosexual, and not. Humans are the ONLY SPECIES that displays exclusive homosexual behaviour, and in extremely large numbers. Animal species DO NOT. This behaviour is an extremely negative trait to have because it prevents you from passing on your genes. That's it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals
>inb4 wikipedia is run by woke redditors wahh wahh WAHHH
Why are you so obtuse about this fricking point? Why do you straight up lie about animals displaying homsoexual behavior? Are you being paid?
>Why are you so obtuse about this fricking point? Why do you straight up lie about animals displaying homsoexual behavior? Are you being paid?
I repeatedly said they engage in homosexual behaviour, but not exclusive homosexuality, like humans. Everything you posted, supports what I said.
Can you atleast try to have an honest conversation?
Your concept of "exclusively homosexual" is nearly magical at this point, there are over a dozen mammals who in the absence of a female mate, will literally fricking pair bond with their own sex. What's the mental gymnastics to pretend that doesn't happen you stupid moron? And yes, that would involve exclusively exclusive gay sex.
Fine, I'll define it as it's practiced by humans:
Choosing to exclusively pair bond with a male despite the availability of females.
Theres your "magical" definition, and by that definition, again, there exists no exclusive homosexuality in the animal kingdom.
Ok, by that exact definition, you are patently fricking wrong because even when penguins have the option of a female mate, they are known to pair bond exclusively with other male penguins.
So what's the backwards logic for that, homosexual?
Penguins are bird brains, just like you.
>in the absence of a female mate
Ok so literally not exclusively homosexual?
At this point you come off as Brian damaged because even if it wasn't your specific parameters for le exclusive, it's still fricking homosexual behavior they are exhibiting. It's weird as hell to downplay it existing for your cope.
>make claim
>claim is wrong
>get told it's wrong
>"lol but that doesn't matter, chud...."
The absolute fricking state of you sausage-lipped troons.
My claim has remained true this entire time, you have been frantically breaking your back over and over to the point where "okay well animals exhibit homosexual behavior but like...how GAY IS IT REALLY? LIKE A LITTLE GAY OR A BIG GAY"? it's so stupid.
What do you say to penguins with an option of a female mate, still pair bonding with males? Is that something that if you squint really hard, is actually straight if the penguin hides his dick?
>My claim has remained true this entire time, you have been frantically breaking your back over and over to the point where "okay well animals exhibit homosexual behavior but like...how GAY IS IT REALLY? LIKE A LITTLE GAY OR A BIG GAY"? it's so stupid.
I always maintained that exclusive homosexuality doesn't exist, but homosexual behaviour does. Then you went on post after post showing me that my claim is true, homosexual behaviour does exist, but not exclusive homosexual behaviour. Then for some reason you get autistic over the word "exclusive", acting as if it's some kind of weird, intangible word.
>What do you say to penguins with an option of a female mate, still pair bonding with males?
For the purpose of raising an egg where it would have a higher chance of surviving with 2 males who pair bonded? I'd say that's normal evolutionary activity because it has a positive effect on the baby penguin.
Gays who go around fricking other guys and spreading diseases in non stop orgies, exclusively? Bit different there.
>exclusive homosexuality doesn't exist, but homosexual behaviour does.
Which is a meaningless semantic that has amounted into just frantic goalpost shifting about the gayness level of a particular animal and I'm not convinced this has been a bad faith attempt from the start.
*now
>Which is a meaningless semantic
Exclusively performing a behaviour is quite different than incidentally performing one, wouldn't you say? Theres nothing semantic about the word except that you don't like it.
>there would be no gays without modern medicine
>but don't say I'm suggesting they didn't exist without modern medicine
Anon, different fella here, are you pretending to be stupid?
This is the dumbest post in this thread
Ah yeah, the classic "no ur wrong!" argument, with no further points.
There is literally no scientific basis for "gays pass a gene for being gay" to offspring, there is no evidence that's ever been presented to suggest that. This is not how genetic markers fricking work. Sexual dimorphism is not specifically the type of genetic marker you seem to be pretending it is.
>There is literally no scientific basis for "gays pass a gene for being gay" to offspring, there is no evidence that's ever been presented to suggest that.
There is no gay gene. Just like there's no intelligence gene. Or height gene. The genes that are markers for intelligence exist in the hundreds. I never pretended theres a single gay gene like you're implying.
You are suggesting that gays reproducing with beards is somehow going to increase the likelihood that their kids are born gay, which is so absurd to the point of telling me you don't understand how sexual attraction is codified neurologically in the human species, because it's not a hardline axiom, you aren't born with hardline sexuality, it's developed.
>You are suggesting that gays reproducing with beards is somehow going to increase the likelihood that their kids are born gay
That's right. Sexual attraction is genetic. That genetic basis gives rise to certain proclivities, it's not the proclivities that give rise to the sexual attraction.
Yeah no, that's not how developed sexual dimorphism works in human beings bud, "gayness" is not something thwt is genetically passed along to offspring, it doesnt work like that no mstter what youe homeschool teacher (mom) told you.
Sexual dismorphism is mostly evolutionary sexual selection. The frick are you talking about? How can you possibly say theres no genetic component to it? That makes zero sense to say.
I'm saying it's not the type of genetic marker you think it is. There exists no "passing off the gay gene" to an offspring, because that's not how any of this works
I already said there is no "gay gene" just like theres no "intelligence gene". What are you arguing against exactly? Theres hundreds of genetic markers that influence things like sexuality, in multiple different ways.
Then why do you make primary arguments that are blanket dumb statements?
I don't. You infer them as such. if I say it's genetically influenced, and then you claim that I think theres "a gay gene", that's YOUR claim brought about your inference of what I said, and was never my claim.
Stop inferring what people say through whatever filter your mind uses, and actually read what they say.
>I'm backtracking and getting caught
Whatever you say, Ahmed.
lol where is the backtracking. Show me where I said that being gay is caused by a single gene. I never made such a claim. YOU, however, did. Either be honest in the conversation, or don't take part in it.
Also, for the future, stop inferring what people say. I don't know what the frick is with people and their arguing strategy today, but the amount of inferring, rather than listening to what the person is actually say, is maddening.
>gays wouldn't exist without modern medicine
get monkeypox heathen
On one hand I find homosexualry disgusting but on the other hand lesbian sex is pretty kino. What do I do anons?
That is one of the most wholesome things
>/s
Someone redpill me about the /s
it's redditspeak for "this post was sarcastic, actually"
Seethe harder homosexual, you don't need to be a /misc/ack to hate soulless nostalgia-bait reboots.
shut up groomer before you get strung up
>/s
Go back
Yes, and also racist.
yes
not fear but disgust.
inshallah
is that his daughter or his wife he was going to take to see the movie?
daughter-wife
Congratulations we live in Middle Ages.
shut the frick up homosexual
OH NO!!!!!
Cool it with the islamophobic remarks.
They are all going to get drone bombed by Disney, r.i.p.
Darn, I thought this was gonna be a wholesome break from all the toxic shit I’ve been seeing…
stop staring at your toilet then
Die in a fire, homosexual
4edgy6me
seething dick smoker
He reposted a comment from the video. A bunch of responses were just youtube comments, wonder if it's a bot. Probably not and just an anon baiting
Regardless, you see all the homosexuals incapable of opening their mouths. Islam is 100% right about homosexuality
>Cinemaphile has now become so moronic that they unironically flirt with Islamic ideology
So embarrassing
>islam
broken clock and all that
You're just underage, anon.
im 48. the slippery slope is real
So you are just easily impressionable then? Cool.
If I was impressionable I'd be going along with all the woke bullshit, zoomie.
What?
>I'm very smart
>but also praise Allah!
lol ok you dumb homosexual.
No one said anything about praising allah, you dumb Black person. They are merely right to throw homosexuals from rooftops
>I'm very smart
>but also I want to be a violent Islamic extremist and throw people off rooftops
truly, a genius
Shocking satanic trips. No wonder you're a pedo simp
>everyone who thinks I'm moronic is a pedo
Better than flirting with Progressive Fundamentalist ideology
it's only okay with little boys? that's pretty fricked up anon
>Probably not and just an anon baiting
probably not bot-kun
Kek, saw that one. Love all the idiots losing their minds in the comments
You are toxic
Fear Allah Disney
al-basad
oy
Wholesome.
For one minute I thought it was gonna end like those homosexual san francisco lgbt ~~*pastors*~~ but it ends with Fear Allah Disney. No subversion at all. Based.
Inshallah!
mashallah lets get icecream
I love how the only acceptable way to be against homosexuality anymore is to be a Muslim.
Truly, the 2000s-era Christians didn't just lose, they got BTFO
Truly Islam is the only way forward
T-this is a joke right haha...
Darn
Extremely based. The lesson from Sodom and Gomorrah has apparently been forgotten by too many.
>he says on one of the most depraved parts of the internet
LARPing tradcucks are some of the most moronic people on this site
Which Christian I wonder
I love watching these homosexuals seethe. Can’t wait for the Islamic takeover of the west.
FYI israelitetube filters any comments with the word “groomer” and returns and SSL error. Any other comment is fine
Hahahahahaha
>Tik tok attention whoring
Yeah, I just love watching this narcissism
What phenotype is this?
Rat
Londoner
subhanallah this is very based
ohhh i bet you're muslim!!!!
All the cucks seething in the comments
>no lgbt
>hate israeli
How come muslim get away with it? And the left would still defend them
>sandBlack folk can't draw eyes because of their autistic beliefs
I like it personally.
Never ever gonna watch it
I pirated this but I can't be arsed to watch it. Should I give it a go?
No.
i wasn't going to watch it but then i saw there was a youtube video where a shrieking negress demands i watch it
Toy Story 4 killed Pixar (co-writer Rashida Jones got John Lassiter fired). It's been flop city ever since.
homosexual shills are claiming that flopping is their end game so that they can fully transition to streaming and cut out the theaters entirely.
Woke shit aside, It's honestly just really boring and unfunny. A lot of repeating the same joke literally within the same minute. Plot points that go nowhere. None of the characters are particularly likeable. The movie beats you over the head with it's "you can't do it alone" theme ad nauseam. The one genuine laugh the movie got out of me was unintentional.
>The one genuine laugh the movie got out of me was unintentional.
what was it
>*tanks you're movie*
>Make a movie about a character who was inspired by over the top cheesy space serials from the 50s
>don't make it an over the top cheesy space adventure
What the frick were they thinking?
The people who grew up on 50s cheesy space adventures were all fired or #metoo'd, so they only have a bunch of millennials whose only knowledge of space movies is Interstellar.
>What the frick were they thinking?
>We need to boost that ESG score up. Blackrock-sama will savu us
>6.83M subscribers
>20K views
lmao
I wanted to write the same when I saw the numbers.
A youtuber would kill himself when his channel is this dead.
>How does it feel to have lived long enough to see all your favorite franchises go down in flames?.jpg
There was a time when Pixar was basically unstoppable, its so sad to see all of this bullshit
Everything in life is a trend, everything must end. So unless pixar change course then year, this is the beginning of the end, but they probably just got lazy expecting to havr a hit because they are pixar.
>it really was posted 1 day ago
Kek how much desperate can they get?
why is she wearing a plastic zookeeper outfit
Same here. It was honestly just too much. I'm gonna end my life and I suggest you do the same, sister.
I'm really confused by the lightyear trailer that gets spammed on Hulu, the whole ad is just the quirky cat thing talking and none of it is funny
They realize focusing on the grotesquely ugly cast would turn people off, so just focus on the cat character and people might check it out.
I'm barely even aware it exists
NOPE.
I am fricking tired of this.
>make a movie white Americans, black Americans, hispanic Americans, israeli Americans, Arab Americans, Hindu Americans, Canadians, Central and South Americans, Asian nations, the Middle East, Africa, India, and Europe all hate
>FRICKING WHITE PEOPLE DESTROYED OUR MOVIE WITH RACISM, gayISM, SEXISM!
It's a broken record.
Remember when Pixar made quality and didn’t need to give you a pep talk about why you should see it.
I miss Steve jobs so bad lads.
who is steve jobs?
ligma balls
Jobs and his make consumers fanatics credo so they will buy anything no matter how overpriced as long as corporate brand name is attached to it is responsible for 1/2 the shit ruining society today
I will never watch any marvel, warner bros or disney movie and literally nobody can force me to
>This movie isn't for you.
So I just didn't watch it. Deal with it. Make movies for me or I won't watch them.
God, the characters are ugly.
It's always some super ugly person or a weird looking mixed race person that's supposed to "represent" all the brown folk. None of them feel represented or even look remotely like the freaks that get cast.
The rich israelites who make these movies think that minorities = brown, ugly and poor.
Funny that Blackrock quite literally is rich israelites.
Funny how "representation" turns into boring grey slop that pleases no one.
Would rather watch a Tyler Perry movie with a bunch of Black folks all making fools of themselves than this
Representation was at it's peak in the 90s and early 2000s.
Feels like a completely different era. Frick wokeness
This is depressing.
>before
>"Hey let's poke fun at all the 'graceful white savior' stuff"
>after
>"Fink-sama, our ESG rating needs to be higher, what do we need to do?"
>"cast Jonah Hill, Seth Rogen, and Mindy Kaling"
Because back then they were still characters.
ahh when blacks were are equals and not our sheep to be flocked
>the 90s and early 2000s.
Damn, I miss my childhood and youth.
being a sanctimonious c**t is just mainstream now, thanks to the internet being available to so many normalgay losers
its amazing watching older media and seeing plenty of diversity done right. no one gave a shit back then about race because it felt so natural you didnt even think about it
It's almost like white bois have been radicalized by incel media or something,,,,
>da moobie made me do the crime!
But if that was the case you'd feel repulsed by diversity in older media as well.
Discord is very harsh on incel content and bans it immediately. That guy was on a furry discord.
In his manifesto he says that /misc/ is where he got his "education."
>radicalized by incel media
Does it hurt being that stupid?
Probably the most memorable character on the show is a black parapalegic with a severe speech impediment and nearly every joke or scene that involves him comments on that in some way and it's never once offensive or "punching down"
You morons are literally the only ones talking about this baby film and getting mad about it
don’t be mad because you can’t groom my baby
/misc/ zoomer memes aren't real life, newbie.
homosexuals definitely reproduce by raping kids
uh huh
>ok we are making a movie how do we get kids to watch it
>idk make it fun and cool looking
>I KNOW WHY DONT WE MAKE BUZZ LIGHTYEAR A GAY troony I HEARD THAT'S COOL ON THE CLICKCLOCK
>genius!
>FOR THE LOVE OF GOD JUST FRICKING WATCH OUR MOVIE ALREADY
There have now been more bad Pixar movies than good Pixar movies.
it's still 13 good vs 13 bad. even split
There's only 3 good pixar movies: Ratatouille, The Incredibles and WALL-E and I'm only counting that last one because I want to cum on EVE
>no finding nemo
>no monsters inc
soulless and fatherless.
It feels so weird, just like how The Simpsons is a shitty show that started out with a few great seasons.
We already had erotic lebian scenes in free tv kid kino in the 90s/00s though.
its still in theaters?
No, but they're streaming it. They need good numbers, I presume.
My niece watched it last night and she’s been eye fricking my mom all day. Sheeeeeet
I refuse to watch anything that has black women in it.
1 reason to not watch it
gay Black folk from outer space already exists
I was hesitant for a while but it's gotten to the point that it seems hard to deny that conservative backlash is hurting movies in a significant way. Makes sense when you consider that this is at least a third of the country, if not moreso when taking account who are parents
It makes sense though at this point the only way for a kids show to do well in theaters is to have it appeal to conservativsx. A high brow kids show like Lightyear is more geared towards parents that are rightfully scared of their children contracting COVID-19. Minions, on the other hand, is targeted at women with 5 kids who occasionally ends up at the battered woman shelter after their forklift driving husband had "just a little too much to drink", but she always comes back to him anyway since he does pay the Trailer lot fee and provides a roof for all those little future Trump voters that are running around screaming and pissing and shitting all over each other who are then dragged to go see Minions so that their parents can ditch them in the theater before they go back to the car for some disgusting hick sex so they can pump out another runt that will go see the Minions next movie. But I'd think Pixar die than making conservative films like the minions.
Lol this desperate fricking cope.
"Uh uh our films are just TOO SMART to make money!!!..."
Holy fricking kek, just accept you're a tolerated but unpopular ideologucal minority. Your shit doesn't make money, despite having every advantage possible over your opposition, because your ideals are noxious and grating to people who actually have families and reproduce, i.e. the majority of society.
But I thought that this movie's success proved that they didn't need chud countries like China/Russia to be successful? What happened?
Nonono where's the punchline!!! They can't be serious r-right??!
The plot was so fricking strange and depressing.
>were thriving on this planet
>lol hi im buzz and I'm going to keep skipping forward in time for no reason multiple times so my friend can miss me and I watch her grow old
>lol fk it I'm gunna stay in this shitty future with said friends daughter and play space rangers
What the frick was the point in him to continue fricking going forward in time?
China never banned Lightyear. They love gay shit. It's why they support Biden.
You didn't shoot down pelosi's plane xia zhung daong
>Watching any Toy Story related content
>When you know it can't match the literary genius of Woody Got Wood
One day while Andy was jerking off, Woody got wood. He could no longer help himself! He watched as Andy stroked his juicy kawaii wiener. He approached Andy which startled him and make him pee everywhere on the floor and on Woody too. Being drenched in his urine made him harder than ever! Woody: "Andy Senpai! I'm alive and I want to be INSIDE OF YOU." Andy: "Oh Woody Chan! I always knew you were alive! I want to stuff you up my kawaii ass!" Woody grabbed a bunch of flavored lube and rubbed it all over his head. Woody: "Oh my! It's cherry flavored lube! Cherry is my favorite!" Woody then stuffed his head up into Andy's tight ass! The other toys around the room watched intently as Woody shoved his head back and forth into Andy's nice ass, continuously making a squishy wet noise. The other toys also became aroused and they all gathered around Woody and Andy and started to urinate all over them, and then they started to jerk off. Andy: "Oh my goodness, Woody Chan! You are churning my insides up so well! Your nose is stimulating my prostate! OH YES!" All the other toys became so aroused by this, that they could not help themselves anymore! They pushed Woody completely inside, and they all went inside. All of them wanted to be inside Andy's nice round ass. Andy: "No wait guys! My ass cannot hold this much! I'm getting so full!" All the toys went inside of poor squirming Andy and pretty much, he was beyond full, and died from having his insides completely damaged. The mother came inside and found Andy, dead with a huge ass hemorrhage on his anus, with a HUGE belly full of toys.
kino
when did spreading a message supplant selling toys of the characters to children?
Biden weaponized Hollywood to own the chuds in Russia and China. It's why they keep banning these movies and why libs feel like they have to support them.
Lightyear can't even sell cereal.
>Fantastic voice cast
>Actors using their normal speaking voice
Lmao that article aged badly
Should have picked Maverick to highlight as an example for their point, a movie that was actually outright banned in China
>10 reasons to watch
>still have a fricking black women as the host
They're really not getting it, are they?
>reasons to watch our movie
They are really desesperate
I'm not gonna watch it. Ughh, I know! I just won't watch it haha
No thanks
Oof.
Why homosexuals do this to themselves? spreading disease to non homosexuals, jeopardize our daily life, endanger our children and they expect us to not blame them. What the frick do they actually want?
If there was a "cure" for homosexuality, a vaccine that would kill sexual attraction to the same sex and make you attracted to the opposite sex, would you take it?