FOR THE LOVE OF GOD JUST FRICKING WATCH OUR MOVIE ALREADY

lol you are stupid. and gays have to PUUUUSSSHHH when they really dont need to. kids will giggle and laugh at all shit, but gays and even over religious people jsut need to push shit sometimes and I hate them for it.
Im the same person I was years ago when Christians were banning DnD and music. now the homosexuals are doing to because my hurt feelings.
No one is gay dragging them on mass and when they do it get harshest punishment.
so much so that gays are higher tiered than blacks so if its a black on gay crime the black goes under rather than gay.

Trust me I see this in TV and movies all the time it really was occupy that made them push it to get us to look away from the class divide but I blame the people watching tv for falling for it.

I didn't read your seething blog post, Ahmed.

Is this just peak summer hours in Baghdad or some shit? When does school start back up for you?

>Cinemaphile is my local Muslim message board to cry about gays and praise Allah
>on television and film

>gays aren't accepted on Cinemaphile
there is an entire board dedicating to jerking off to them, Muhammad. Where do you think we fricking are? Your Mosque?

>literal election tourist in between reeeing about gays is telling anyone else how board culture is
>also praise Allah!
Just permaban and IP from the ME at this point, Christ Almighty are you people insufferable.

>I've been here longer, also praise Allah and AHHHH homosexualS EXIST I'M LITERALLY GOING INSANE AHHH

Imagine coming to fricking Cinemaphile, of all places, to moral post about your prophet Muhammad and Allah. Imagine, just imagine.

>I'm merely pretending to be Islamic
Cool? I'm not sure what you get out of all this, it's just nonsense behavior on an anime porn site.

kek oh wow you really are pathetic. You can't be older than 18.

anon... he literally just said inshallah and posted a Muslim guy and you automatically assumed he was.

you kind are moronic and maybe even racist. just plain naive at least if that's all it takes. can i have your credit care number I work for Nintendo. see I'm Asian

anon you are just coping now for being so easily fooled and you know it. fricking no shame in you

Muslims love fricking kids though

So I can frick kids so long as I marry them? Fricking sweet, sign me up

incels will simultaneously rage over TCAP while posting "the 100 year old anime sorceress" and cry about gays grooming kids.

How about telling me where Im wrong you moron. You think a magical fairy comes down from the sky and makes you gay? It's genetics. In the past gay people still got married and had kids, and passed on those genes. Modern gays don't do that, thus, no genes to pass on.

>>gays didn't exist before modern medicine

Cool strawman but I never said that.

And yeah, genes. Do you not believe in evolution? Or do you not understand how it works?

If religion caused short people to always get wives, and have kids, those genetics for short people would be passed on to the next generation. If religion was abolished, and women could choose not to get with short men, then those short guys wouldn't propagate their genes, and it would result in the future generation being taller. That's how genes and evolution works. There are no gay men who have to pretend to be straight, have wives, and have kids. They can freely now be genetic dead ends.

>You literally said they only exist because of modern medicine which implies...they didn't exist before it, are you moronic?

No buddy that's exactly what YOU said to my post, not what I said.

Go back and read what I said. I said "there would be no homosexuality without modern medicine". There is zero implication in that sentence that says gays didn't exist before.

Atleast TRY to have a honest conversation.

Where do you think gays come from? Magic? It's genes.

*underage

>Without modern medicine, it's not possible for homosexuality to thrive.
...which continues to be a hilariously stupid statement to make when gays have existed for literal thousands of fricking years.

>extremely few
Absolutely sending my sides into orbit holy shit, what rock have you lived under during the entire development of the human fricking species?

>There is no development of the human species with a significant gay population.
Fricking kek, you have literally no concept of human history and how messy the entire story of human development has been for the last few hundred thousand years, it's wholesome almost with how naive you are.

Gays or people just fricking their same sex has been a thing written about and talked about and in society since we discovered fricking fire, Ahmed.

Yeah nobody is saying that strawman, moron. I'm saying you are clearly and purposefully lying about gays existing. Weird that is, wonder what the reason for that narrative is?

How were there gays everywhere without massive amounts of diseases gotten from fricking eachother in the ass? Did bacteria not exist back then?

Significant gay populations have always been in collapsing civilisations, moron. You are a human disease.

Neuroscientists and biologists actually all agree that people are far less heteronormative than we pretend they are and that cultural impacts repress base sexual drives in our species.

Ah yes, those woke nueroscientists over on reddit.

>No, neuroscientists and biologists actually all agree that cultural impacts encourage people to be far more homosexual than they naturally are.
No.

>No, neuroscientists and biologists actually all agree that cultural impacts encourage people to be far more homosexual than they naturally are.

I agree but the genetic seeds must still be planted for that behaviour to take place. I have ZERO inclination to take a guys dick. No amount of cultural impact will change that Im disgusted at the idea of fricking a dude.

Literally nothing backs this groom maymay up. You don't become the opposite attraction if you were raped.

Yeah, the irl Goebbels "study" the Nazis did on gays grooming children is an unfounded meme that has somehow carried its way into Stormfront talking points 70 years later.

You mean aside from 47% of homosexuals admitting to having been molested as a child by an adult male?
You mean aside from gays being 1.5% of the population, but more than a third of the child-molestors?

>47 percent of gays have been molested because I heard this once on /misc/
do you morons even bother to look up the literal propaganda you consume?

>NOOOOO, WHEN I SAID "TRUST THE SCIENCE" I DIDN'T MEAN THE SCIENCE I DIDN'T LIKE THAT FINDS CONCLUSIONS I DON'T LIKE!!! IF SCIENCE PRODUCES A CONUSION THAT IS A HECKIN' WRONGTHINK IT IS LE PROPAGANDA!!!

>Some MSPaint shit you saw on pol isn't "science", kiddo.
That's not where that comes from, it comes from consistent results of voluntary studies and surveys.
While on the topic of what isn't "science", neither is Kinsey molesting literal infants and using the fact that it made them cry to conclude "lol we're all gay actually".

>You're quoting the story run by a Christian church, yeah?
Lol no?
Nice baseless assumption to dismiss results you don't like, shit-fricker.
Can you hurry up asnd die of an easily preventable disease already?

>47 percent of gays have been molested because I heard this once on /misc/
do you morons even bother to look up the literal propaganda you consume?

>I saw it on reddit
Woah, that's basically a scientific fact then!

>everyone is troony
>I base my worldviews in things from reddit and Cinemaphile
have a nice day, gormless idiot.

Why do you tourists always bring up CNN as if anyone is actually watching it?

Fine, MSNBC then. It's all the same garbage.

Nobody cares about what news stations your boogeymen watch in your head.

I'm not about to explain to some moron on Cinemaphile where I get my news from.

>We certainly see next to zero exclusive homosexuality in the animal kingdom
This is patently and pathologically false.

You didn't write a paper on it because there are literally hundreds of mammals who engage in homosexual behavior and if you "looked it up" you'd know that. For fricks sake, Banobo apes literally engage in orgies with both male and females as a way of preventing infanticide. They are our direct cousins. Shut the frick up about science you don't know.

>an evolutionary trait to prevent infanticide within their tribe is "incidental"
It was literally a characteristic they developed to compete with how chimps would murder the offspring of betas from warring groups you astronomically fricking stupid moron. Over 200 mammalian species engage in homosexual behavior as either a evolutionary driven need or, your favorite term, "incidental" in the sense that they just don't moralgay on Cinemaphile about it.

>everyone studying biology is just lying
Ok again, I will for the third time explain to you that in the territorial struggles between bonobos and chimps, it was common for chimps (as they engage in infanticide among their own population groups) would kill bonobo offspring as well, to combat this and the markers in their own species for the same aggression, they developed an approach where no offspring actually knows who the father is. This springboarded into bonobos just fricking everything that moves, regardless of sex. This is not "incidental" sexual behavior, tard. This is a ln evolution-driven trait.

>This springboarded into bonobos just fricking everything that moves, regardless of sex

But that claim about bonobo's is a bunch of bullshit from people who looked at bonobo's in captivity rather than in the wild. Bonobo's in the wild do not display that behaviour.

https://skepticink.com/incredulous/2014/12/29/questioning-sexy-bonobo-hype-part-2-primatologist-responds-christopher-ryan/

Data sets from the wild clearly show that over the course of a year female bonobos do not copulate any more than female chimpanzees.

> there are literally thousands of actual scientific papers released on bonobos in the wild

Lol most of the big papers released about bonobo's sexual behaviour from the last 40 years are from less than 4 institutes. You have zero idea what you're talking about.

>Data sets from the wild clearly show that over the course of a year female bonobos do not copulate any more than female chimpanzees.
Lying is fun. That is false
>the studies are wrong because...because they are ok???

Sure would love to see you data from actual peer reviewed sources and not a fricking incel skeptic blog.

I accept your concession than, Ivan.

>literally won't post the "data" he was arguing about
>gets mad, does a "you look silly" post instead
Woah, is this the power of the Right guys?

There are literally mammals that engage in exclusive homsoexual behavior though, no amount of your semantics changes that. You are begging with this "muh exclusivity" nonsense because you can't just accept that the homsoexual behavior happens, so instead it must be like they fell and slipped their monkey dicks jnto asses by accident or some goofy shit. It's so very bizzare to claim that it's "kinda gay but like not really bro" like a teenager trying to justify jerking it to a trap. It's just gay, you codifying it as being less authentic because it's a "behavior" doesn't make any logical fricking sense.

Literally does not.

>There are literally mammals that engage in exclusive homsoexual behavior though,

No. There's not. Sorry, but it's not true. I believe theres 2 recorded cases in history, which is extraordinarily rare and puts it in line with extremely rare diseases.

>"You are begging with this "muh exclusivity" nonsense because you can't just accept that the homsoexual behavior happens"

Still inferring and making stawmen out of what Im saying rather that listening to what Im saying. Stop having an emotional reaction to what I say. It clouds your ability to think.

Theres a clear difference between exclusively homosexual, and not. Humans are the ONLY SPECIES that displays exclusive homosexual behaviour, and in extremely large numbers. Animal species DO NOT. This behaviour is an extremely negative trait to have because it prevents you from passing on your genes. That's it.

>Why are you so obtuse about this fricking point? Why do you straight up lie about animals displaying homsoexual behavior? Are you being paid?

I repeatedly said they engage in homosexual behaviour, but not exclusive homosexuality, like humans. Everything you posted, supports what I said.

Can you atleast try to have an honest conversation?

Fine, I'll define it as it's practiced by humans:

Choosing to exclusively pair bond with a male despite the availability of females.

Theres your "magical" definition, and by that definition, again, there exists no exclusive homosexuality in the animal kingdom.

Penguins are bird brains, just like you.

At this point you come off as Brian damaged because even if it wasn't your specific parameters for le exclusive, it's still fricking homosexual behavior they are exhibiting. It's weird as hell to downplay it existing for your cope.

My claim has remained true this entire time, you have been frantically breaking your back over and over to the point where "okay well animals exhibit homosexual behavior but like...how GAY IS IT REALLY? LIKE A LITTLE GAY OR A BIG GAY"? it's so stupid.

What do you say to penguins with an option of a female mate, still pair bonding with males? Is that something that if you squint really hard, is actually straight if the penguin hides his dick?

>exclusive homosexuality doesn't exist, but homosexual behaviour does.
Which is a meaningless semantic that has amounted into just frantic goalpost shifting about the gayness level of a particular animal and I'm not convinced this has been a bad faith attempt from the start.

>Which is a meaningless semantic

Exclusively performing a behaviour is quite different than incidentally performing one, wouldn't you say? Theres nothing semantic about the word except that you don't like it.

This is the dumbest post in this thread

>You literally said they only exist because of modern medicine which implies...they didn't exist before it, are you moronic?

No buddy that's exactly what YOU said to my post, not what I said.

Go back and read what I said. I said "there would be no homosexuality without modern medicine". There is zero implication in that sentence that says gays didn't exist before.

Atleast TRY to have a honest conversation.

Where do you think gays come from? Magic? It's genes.

There is literally no scientific basis for "gays pass a gene for being gay" to offspring, there is no evidence that's ever been presented to suggest that. This is not how genetic markers fricking work. Sexual dimorphism is not specifically the type of genetic marker you seem to be pretending it is.

You are suggesting that gays reproducing with beards is somehow going to increase the likelihood that their kids are born gay, which is so absurd to the point of telling me you don't understand how sexual attraction is codified neurologically in the human species, because it's not a hardline axiom, you aren't born with hardline sexuality, it's developed.

Yeah no, that's not how developed sexual dimorphism works in human beings bud, "gayness" is not something thwt is genetically passed along to offspring, it doesnt work like that no mstter what youe homeschool teacher (mom) told you.

I'm saying it's not the type of genetic marker you think it is. There exists no "passing off the gay gene" to an offspring, because that's not how any of this works

Then why do you make primary arguments that are blanket dumb statements?

>I'm backtracking and getting caught
Whatever you say, Ahmed.

>gays wouldn't exist without modern medicine

>islam
broken clock and all that

im 48. the slippery slope is real

If I was impressionable I'd be going along with all the woke bullshit, zoomie.

it's only okay with little boys? that's pretty fricked up anon

What?

No one said anything about praising allah, you dumb Black person. They are merely right to throw homosexuals from rooftops

Shocking satanic trips. No wonder you're a pedo simp

Better than flirting with Progressive Fundamentalist ideology

In his manifesto he says that /misc/ is where he got his "education."