Ford is too sentimental; Kubrick is too cold; Hitchwiener is too controlling; Godard is too didactic; Ozu is too muted; and Antonioni is too abstract.
Ford is too sentimental; Kubrick is too cold; Hitchcock is too controlling; Godard is too didactic; Ozu is too muted; and Antonioni is too abstract.
Fellini?
boll?
>Ford is too sentimental
wrong
Bergman?
>Antonioni is too fun to say
OP is too homosexual.
Usually Capra is the one who is accused of being too sentimental
How the hell does Ford even get on this list? That wienersucker directed the same shitty westerns over and over again and kept casting a charisma black hole like John Wayne.
homosexual
no, a homosexual is what John Wayne was. My uncle was hired to install two way mirrors in Wayne's place in Brentwood and he said the guy liked to dress up like a woman and watch other men frick his wife
the hell he was
Almost every director credits Ford as an influence
Even the most pretentious filmmakers you can think of love Ford.
like who? genuine question
lucas spielberg kurosawa
he said pretentious
Straub
Costa, Erice, Antonioni, Fellini, basically all the French guys, Satyajit Ray
Tarantinio was the GOAT of all time
porve me wrong
pulp fiction is shit
>the same shitty westerns
spotted the speedwatcher
Tarantino is too reddity
israeli trash gtfo
too black
it amazes me that there's still people that fall for this idiot's cult, especially after his non-top stream of shit post Jackie Brown.
i guess it's true, a sucker is born every minute.
Nolan perhaps?
Try Elio Petri.
ITT Ten directors we don't care for.
Antonioni --zzzzzz why do the characters have no motivation
Lars von Troll --half baked and over stuffed philosophy
Bela Tarr --zzzzzz did they invent colored film in Hungary yet?
Kiarostami --get out of that fricking car
Resnais --same shit looping for 2 hours
Fassbinder --be more melodramatic
Kubric --genre bawd
PTA --frankly I just don't get what's good about his movies
Hitchwiener --soulless and meaningless
Almodovar --