>Hans should have suffocated Anna with a cushion.
Hans should've just kept playing the innocent boyfriend and keep trying to help Anna until she actually, definitively died. This way he gets to do one of two things: >Anna dies? I better go kill Elsa because I actually now have a legitimate reason to! >Anna survives? Well, I loved her all this time, so now I get to be the princess's - and eventually queen's - boyfriend!
Instead he screws himself over for literally no reason. He doesn't even get tricked into it.
Instead of his motivation being purely for gains, he should have wanted to go after Elsa because she's a legitimate threat which is what the movie was pointing to up until his stupid reveal. He would be so much better as a misguided hero antagonist than a straight up villain
Picrel is the biggest piece of horseshit in the whole film, because it's designed to actively deceive the audience.
If he's evil he shouldn't be smiling like a nice guy when he's alone and nobody can see him, and there's nothing in his true character that would have him grinning like an idiot like this.
Then at the end the film is like, "Ha! Got you, he's evil - what a twist huh? Bet you didn't see that coming."
Frankly there's nothing wrong with him being secretly an evil butthole, but they should have made that more foreshadowed, yes. It comes out of absolutely nowhere and the movie does spent a lot of time DISproving it.
The problem isn't the lack of foreshadowing but rather the many instances where Hans's actions outright contradict his ulterior motive. There's no reason to save Elsa if he needed her dead for his plan to work.
Yes, like I said. The movie feels like it didn't intend to add the twist and put it in at the last minute. It spends a lot of time vouching for Hans' good intentions and then just throws it all away with no explanation whatsoever.
He's not innocent, but I think Disney severely overestimated how much people actually hate him.
It feels like they saw a bunch of YT thumbnails calling him bad, and didn't realize they were complaining about the shitty writing.
Still not as bad as the Duke of Weselton who was so 1-dimensional they had to have him literally spell out his evil motive.
Like a fricking moron he revealed his plan to Anna for no reason besides being an butthole.
That's what he did wrong. He fricked himself.
Aside from the attempted murder and take over of a kingdom.
And also being an enormous moron, yes.
In his defense on this one matter, he does tell Anna he came to court Elsa "but no one was getting anywhere with her."
Hans should have suffocated Anna with a cushion.
Disney wants everyone to hate him but he's kind of the only decent leader in the series.
>Hans should have suffocated Anna with a cushion.
Hans should've just kept playing the innocent boyfriend and keep trying to help Anna until she actually, definitively died. This way he gets to do one of two things:
>Anna dies? I better go kill Elsa because I actually now have a legitimate reason to!
>Anna survives? Well, I loved her all this time, so now I get to be the princess's - and eventually queen's - boyfriend!
Instead he screws himself over for literally no reason. He doesn't even get tricked into it.
Instead of his motivation being purely for gains, he should have wanted to go after Elsa because she's a legitimate threat which is what the movie was pointing to up until his stupid reveal. He would be so much better as a misguided hero antagonist than a straight up villain
correct
whats with the xiphos?
Disney did Hans dirty.
Hans needs to be redeemed, but that will never happen as long as Jennifer Lee is in charge.
"men bad" isnt enough of a motivation tbh
The sword is wrong for the period.
Same period as Tangled
>picking Anna over Elsa
Wrong
Elsa is good as a Cinemaphilecubine, but not a wife
the same ten threads over and over and over and over
Explain cause I'm confused
Picrel is the biggest piece of horseshit in the whole film, because it's designed to actively deceive the audience.
If he's evil he shouldn't be smiling like a nice guy when he's alone and nobody can see him, and there's nothing in his true character that would have him grinning like an idiot like this.
Then at the end the film is like, "Ha! Got you, he's evil - what a twist huh? Bet you didn't see that coming."
Frick you Disney.
He's supposed to be deceiving Anna, not us.
he's happy that it's all going according to keikaku
Not that kind of smile. It's a 'goofball in love' smile.
he's in love with his keikaku
Frankly there's nothing wrong with him being secretly an evil butthole, but they should have made that more foreshadowed, yes. It comes out of absolutely nowhere and the movie does spent a lot of time DISproving it.
The problem isn't the lack of foreshadowing but rather the many instances where Hans's actions outright contradict his ulterior motive. There's no reason to save Elsa if he needed her dead for his plan to work.
Yes, like I said. The movie feels like it didn't intend to add the twist and put it in at the last minute. It spends a lot of time vouching for Hans' good intentions and then just throws it all away with no explanation whatsoever.