This also applies to his acting roles, in JoJo rabbit he literally had one scene where all he had to do was stand around be a lanky creep and got paid in diamond mines
Is anyone actually not on Steve's side here? The change was clearly his and Karl's assumption he could just take it from Steve without even asking is bizarre.
Sure that was nice of him but you can't enter into an unspoken transactional agreement with someone where every gift adds up to a balanced telly. Even if that's generally what we do in our private thoughts, it's uncouth to act as if the other person agrees with it.
I know you're just adding to the joke BTW just wanted to explore the argument
autists will never understand the exchange of mutual friendship like this. you buy your friends a round, at some point they buy you one, etc, you don’t tally or count it because among friends it’s assumed you’re proving eachother with benefit. the kind of people who tally are the ones who never want to buy a round, tight fisted autists who aren’t really your friend, everything is a transaction that must benefit them. they’re always the ones forgetting their wallet and disappearing when it’s time to buy drinks yet they’re the most dogmatic about “what they’re owed”. they don’t understand what a friendship is intuitively like karl does
I've been trying to articulate a way to say what you just posted and yeah. everyone always notices the person who keeps their hands in their pockets or has to pay separately to everyone else instead of just saving time by averaging costs across a group. it's not a complicated form of etiquette
>you don’t tally or count it because among friends it’s assumed you’re proving eachother with benefit
If my friend pisses me off, the first thing I'm going to do is call him out on how much he's mooched off me
There's a standard of social trust which is violated by Steve just taking the 50p by force instead of waiting for Karl to do the right thing and give it to him of his own accord. Steve is tight.
Best answer Steve WAS entitled to the 50p, but it wasnt his to claim, it must be willingly relinqueshed by Karl for the transaction to be true and complete, otherwise its theft
The unilateral decision to not pay someone back was fricked up, regardless of context
You can't just decide to not give someone what their owed without even discussing it with them first, the fact that it was just 50p is irrelevant. Steve, as the one being owed money, is the only person who has the right to let Karl off the hook, Karl doesn't have a leg to stand on
it's not the point, you're being a dick by just shoving it in your pocket and thinking nothing of it. it's my fricking 50p. what if I wanted to put my change in the charity pot for homeless dogs? yeah. didn't think of that did you.
>MY FRICKING 50P
it's 50 fricking pennies, it's nothing to cry over you scummy you tall lanky israelite get over it mate >what if I wanted to put my change in the charity pot for homeless dogs
would you though?
>would you though?
yeah of course I would. it's 50 bastard pence like you said. who gives a shit? well I do if it means the difference between you having a bag of harribos on the way home or lassie getting the shot to be put down
People siding with Karl tend to forget in the XFM days Karl was kind of a c**t to them at times, he just flat out wouldn’t show even after they got him days off work
if I thought two blokes I worked with were giving me the day off so they could sit and take the piss out of me, I'd not turn up initially either. makes them more desperate
>admits to committing credit card fraud and stealing £20 >still paints himself as a good guy because he found the owner and gave his card back later because "I could have taken more"
this is what most people think morality is in the secular age. it’s *not* doing bad things, defined in negation. it’s not the good things you do, it’s the horrible things you want to do but don’t. very fricking weird view of reality based around everything having to think they’re a paragon instead of a flawed person. i can freely admit i’m not a good person because I put frick all effort into it, i’m just polite and nice to people i know.
I think that’s just how people are >yeah i’m a totally selfish most of the time c**t but I could rape someone if I wanted and don’t, so i’m a good person
Yeah, in comparison to a Black person.
Steve is a midwit psychopath who seethes at Karl being actually intelligent but also a member of the friendly working class while Steve feigns intelligence and cannot mingle in society.
There’s so many abstract concepts which Karl is able to grasp, but unable to convey to where closed minded midwits like Ricky and Steve could understand.
People will always like Karl more and Karl achieved genuine companionship while Steve can only grasp at artificial and vain flings
There's a lot of times on the show where Steve clearly seethes at the fact he's sheltered and middle class while Karl and Ricky grew up on shithole council estates and understand the real world.
Yeah there’s multiple occasions where Karl is making perfect sense, and even making quite profound points, but Ricky and Steve aren’t perceptive enough and it goes right over their heads.
It's an autism test like that "where is the doll" comic. The people who don't understand that Karl had to give back the 50p are severely autistic, like Karl himself
poor greta lookin grim
>height is all that matters bro
Eyes bulging with imagined laughs
that is money for old rope
This also applies to his acting roles, in JoJo rabbit he literally had one scene where all he had to do was stand around be a lanky creep and got paid in diamond mines
Lanky co-writah.
>NEVER CALL ME AN INVALID AGAIN. FRICKING BALD c**t.
Shut yo mouf
Is anyone actually not on Steve's side here? The change was clearly his and Karl's assumption he could just take it from Steve without even asking is bizarre.
Yeah 50p isn't a big deal of course, but Steve is absolutely in the right and Karl is being very arrogant
Karl had just given him a free keg of beer
Sure that was nice of him but you can't enter into an unspoken transactional agreement with someone where every gift adds up to a balanced telly. Even if that's generally what we do in our private thoughts, it's uncouth to act as if the other person agrees with it.
I know you're just adding to the joke BTW just wanted to explore the argument
It's not up to Karl to choose how Steve repays his kindness. Steve took Karl to the baftas as his partner
autists will never understand the exchange of mutual friendship like this. you buy your friends a round, at some point they buy you one, etc, you don’t tally or count it because among friends it’s assumed you’re proving eachother with benefit. the kind of people who tally are the ones who never want to buy a round, tight fisted autists who aren’t really your friend, everything is a transaction that must benefit them. they’re always the ones forgetting their wallet and disappearing when it’s time to buy drinks yet they’re the most dogmatic about “what they’re owed”. they don’t understand what a friendship is intuitively like karl does
I've been trying to articulate a way to say what you just posted and yeah. everyone always notices the person who keeps their hands in their pockets or has to pay separately to everyone else instead of just saving time by averaging costs across a group. it's not a complicated form of etiquette
>you don’t tally or count it because among friends it’s assumed you’re proving eachother with benefit
If my friend pisses me off, the first thing I'm going to do is call him out on how much he's mooched off me
That got nicked. Steve didn't even get any
it's just polite to give change back to whoever it belongs to regardless of how much it is, then they can say keep it or take it back
There's a standard of social trust which is violated by Steve just taking the 50p by force instead of waiting for Karl to do the right thing and give it to him of his own accord. Steve is tight.
Best answer Steve WAS entitled to the 50p, but it wasnt his to claim, it must be willingly relinqueshed by Karl for the transaction to be true and complete, otherwise its theft
Don’t be a shekel pincher.
The unilateral decision to not pay someone back was fricked up, regardless of context
You can't just decide to not give someone what their owed without even discussing it with them first, the fact that it was just 50p is irrelevant. Steve, as the one being owed money, is the only person who has the right to let Karl off the hook, Karl doesn't have a leg to stand on
>gives you a free keg of beer
>oy vey but muh 50p!
shut up ~~*Merchant*~~
it's not the point, you're being a dick by just shoving it in your pocket and thinking nothing of it. it's my fricking 50p. what if I wanted to put my change in the charity pot for homeless dogs? yeah. didn't think of that did you.
>MY FRICKING 50P
it's 50 fricking pennies, it's nothing to cry over you scummy you tall lanky israelite get over it mate
>what if I wanted to put my change in the charity pot for homeless dogs
would you though?
>would you though?
yeah of course I would. it's 50 bastard pence like you said. who gives a shit? well I do if it means the difference between you having a bag of harribos on the way home or lassie getting the shot to be put down
Hi Steve
no one likes to make fun of an invalid
tall monkey lookin fella
STOP TALKING SHIT
People siding with Karl tend to forget in the XFM days Karl was kind of a c**t to them at times, he just flat out wouldn’t show even after they got him days off work
if I thought two blokes I worked with were giving me the day off so they could sit and take the piss out of me, I'd not turn up initially either. makes them more desperate
>sauce drinkers discussing a 20 year old argument for the millionth time
And I'm loving every minute of it
>tell me next time when his family dies and we'll have another drink
>i don't know what you're like Karl, mate i don't know what you're like
Steve is so fricking funny
Steve got a case of free beer and still complains about his 50p. Cheap bastard.
>admits to committing credit card fraud and stealing £20
>still paints himself as a good guy because he found the owner and gave his card back later because "I could have taken more"
He didn't even find the owner, he just delivered it to the students council (who probably just took it for themselves)
If it were me i would have emptied that shit. Dog eat dog world
>I could have built more lifts
this is what most people think morality is in the secular age. it’s *not* doing bad things, defined in negation. it’s not the good things you do, it’s the horrible things you want to do but don’t. very fricking weird view of reality based around everything having to think they’re a paragon instead of a flawed person. i can freely admit i’m not a good person because I put frick all effort into it, i’m just polite and nice to people i know.
I think that’s just how people are
>yeah i’m a totally selfish most of the time c**t but I could rape someone if I wanted and don’t, so i’m a good person
Yeah, in comparison to a Black person.
am I a bad person if I enjoy deliberately causing trouble for buttholes? I haven't done much good but I have done plenty of bad to other c**ts
I’d say yeah because the desire is to see suffering, but i’m the exact same way.
No poltard it's not about religion.
OH NONONONONO STEVESISTERS OUR RESPONSE!?
I love 50p's, me
You CAN recognise all the references, right anon?
it's been a while since I listened to them all but I definitely recognise that smartie in the pig's hand
who's the lesbian and Einstein looking couple next to r kid's tank?
Think it's Karl's aunt that was dating (or married?) a guy that looked like Ken Dodd.
Ahh yeah, 'Don't mention that he looks like Ken Dodd'... 'Nice to meet you, Ken'
it's like a childs tv show
lady with the mirror is like something out of a Lynch film
waiting for my 50p karl gays
So how much would have been worth getting like this over? A tenner? Twenty?
Steve is a midwit psychopath who seethes at Karl being actually intelligent but also a member of the friendly working class while Steve feigns intelligence and cannot mingle in society.
There’s so many abstract concepts which Karl is able to grasp, but unable to convey to where closed minded midwits like Ricky and Steve could understand.
People will always like Karl more and Karl achieved genuine companionship while Steve can only grasp at artificial and vain flings
There's a lot of times on the show where Steve clearly seethes at the fact he's sheltered and middle class while Karl and Ricky grew up on shithole council estates and understand the real world.
Yeah there’s multiple occasions where Karl is making perfect sense, and even making quite profound points, but Ricky and Steve aren’t perceptive enough and it goes right over their heads.
It's an autism test like that "where is the doll" comic. The people who don't understand that Karl had to give back the 50p are severely autistic, like Karl himself