Great, we're back to the bad old times when people thought that POC representation in historical movies doesn't matter.
Great, we're back to the bad old times when people thought that POC representation in historical movies doesn't matter.
Great, we're back to the bad old times when people thought that POC representation in historical movies doesn't matter.
God I hope it's good. It's a total cointoss with Ridley Scott these days
>the martian
>the last duel
>alien covenant
It's not a cointoss, it's nothing but shit
Trailer seems a bit GameOfPorno - Je désire que tu manges mon vagin
Huh, an actually novel concept. Never seen a Napoleon movie before.
Outside of the 1927 film there really hasn't been a good napoleon movie
if you think this movie won't be packed full of diversity you're moronic
Have you seen the trailers? The only POC are the Egyptian slaves
Master and Commander is a Napoleon movie morons
A film about European history coming out of 2020s Hollywood. What do you think?
That I'm not going to watch it because every Ridley Scott period piece other than The Duellists sucked
I heard Joacquin Phoenix made himself shorter for the role. Is this true?
One of the Directory politicians (Paul Barras) in the movie is played by an Arab, Tahar Rahim
Arabs are Caucasian
I would not care in the slightest about diversity casting in movies if they stopped shoehorning Black folk into movies where it's either already been established that the character in question is white or where it would have been historically inaccurate for the character to be a Black person. That's literally the only issue I have, and I don't know why globohomosexual is so intent on shitting on me like this.
The most recent three musketeers show did it best by giving Porthos a similar background to Dumas.
Frankly I'm surprised they haven't tried to remake the Master and Commander books because the royal navy pressed everyone who lived close enough to the shore.
They made him gay tho.
this but not just the main character. when you're depicting life in some scandinavian village circa 1100ad and half the population are powerful genderqueer black womxn i'm not going to watch
If it doesn't have much "diversity" then they will make up for it by portraying Napoleon as a clueless moron who is controlled by his girlboss mistress
Ridley doesn't put blacks in his historical movies. He just makes the movies shit.
Ridley clearly has some gay Freudian worldview. Thinks strong women are behind every important man. It's getting stale and gay.
theres literally no indication that this will be the case
You're gonna get at least one Françafrique soldier, probably a relatively important (for his scene) NCO, and at least one of those Mulan types who are pretending to be male to be a soldier, except in 2023 this will actually be treated as a fullly transexual character
Take your meds.
>You're gonna get at least one Françafrique soldier, probably a relatively important (for his scene) NCO
So we'll get historical accuracy?
>at least one of those Mulan types who are pretending to be male to be a soldier, except in 2023 this will actually be treated as a fullly transexual character
That won't be in the film, bet.
iiim blueeeeeeeeeeeee dabnoooddeee dabo daoa
Joacquin looks nothing like Napoleon
When Napoleon was in Egypt, he was in his 20s but in the movie he looks like this.
Already, even if we ignore the piss filter, it's not looking good.
Yeah, he's a bad casting. We needed someone in his 30s to pull of the younger and older Napoleon.
>zoomer napoleon
Cast him, Cinemaphile
Your age limit for historical accuracy is 29
Ratatouille Chalamet can do it.
>'ere's zat twenty nine yea' old keed I waz telling yoo about, mon ami
Why they speaking english in the film ?
Because Napoleon lost.
There is nothing we can do
>we're back to the bad old times when people thought that POC representation in historical movies doesn't matter.
And that's a good thing.
POC don’t matter, period
>hmm, maybe this will be good, Gladiator was grea-
>already doing the gay color filter everywhere shit