>greatest kinos of all time. >half aren't even in color

>greatest kinos of all time
>half aren't even in color
So by what metric are they even considered the greatest? Is it because they were the most influential or groundbreaking in new filmmaking techniques?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >old film is....LE GOOD

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What a horrible list. Anyone who puts Singing in the rain on their list of best movies of all time is a moron or a woman.

      Tasteless millennials

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Critics don't realize that just because a film is influential or changes a paradigm doesn't mean it's "good"

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        But it does means it's Great.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Zoomers don't realize that a film being a one of a kind contribution to an art form that changed the way we think of that art going forward is by far the best metric to consider it great. And no, I don't agree with most critics' lists at all.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What a horrible list. Anyone who puts Singing in the rain on their list of best movies of all time is a moron or a woman.

      Critics don't realize that just because a film is influential or changes a paradigm doesn't mean it's "good"

      A lot of those movies seem trite by today's standards, but they were probably mind-blowing back in their day.

      A lot of the old black and white movies, especially the ones people harp over are just stage dramas. They don't do anything interesting with the medium. I hardly consider them movies.

      There is a reason why the film general is the worst general in this board.

      >Cinemaphile whines about culture being globohomosexual and pozzed now
      >too moronic to appreciate peak pre-globohomosexual cinema
      lol you're all just posturing incels

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Pre-globohomosexual cinema
        moronic schizo. Hollywood has been israelite-run since the 30s

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          yeah, Tokyo Story, Rules of the Game, et al. are really Hollywood. nice one moron.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Whoa 2 examples, what a great refutation. moron.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              half the films on that list were outside of hollyisraelite influence, you fricking idiot

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                not to mention there is nothing remotely pozzed about most of those Hollywood films. are you pretending John Wayne and John Ford are le anti-white, morals subverting joos now?

                Whoa 2 examples, what a great refutation. moron.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If you hate movies so much, why do you browse the movie board?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm pretty sure no one is denying that the movies in OP pic are "great." The question is why those?
        >Un Chien Andalou
        I mean really?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I agree with you Un chien andalou is a bad pick but the "why" is pretty obvious. It's one of the most famous pieces of surrealist art and it's made by two well regarded artists.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Yes it's famous, but it's probably the biggest meme pick on the list when much better genre films are all almost entirely excluded.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >it's probably the biggest meme pick on the list
              what the frick does this mean? talk like a normal person.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Meaning it's on the list because it's "famous," and it's famous for being weird and surreal.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    What a horrible list. Anyone who puts Singing in the rain on their list of best movies of all time is a moron or a woman.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah it feels like more of a "you have to watch all these before you die" list than anything.

      Critics don't realize that just because a film is influential or changes a paradigm doesn't mean it's "good"

      King Kong was probably more influential on the film industry as a whole than most of the movies on that list.

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous
  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Anglo-Franco bias

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    i mean citizen kane is just shit, anyone who claims it's good is a clown. but films like bicycle thieves, the hitchwiener films in that list, the chaplin films, they've got unique and captivating stories, they were experimenting with fresh cinematography, everything was good about them.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      A lot of those movies seem trite by today's standards, but they were probably mind-blowing back in their day.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    When's the new list out?

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Why did Japan stop making kinos?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      They didn't?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Name one good Japanese movie.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Non-meme answer is that television sets started to become commonplace in every Japanese home in the 70's, which meant that audiences were less likely to go to the cinemas. Then the economic collapse in late 1991 severely crippled what was left of their film industry. It's all about the money at the end of the day.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    threads like these remind why I hate nuCinemaphile so fricking much

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      The whole Internet is full of millennials and zoomies who don't watch anything made before they were born. The future is doomed.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That's not true

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'm 33 and only watch older shit. It's just that a lot of movies that are in the running for the "greatest of all time" are only canonized because people just like to repeat what they know other people like. Case in point: Seven Samurai. It's influential, but it's not even Kurosawa's best movie. I liked The Hidden Fortress better.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          High and Low is Kurosawa’s best imo. Ran is his best samurai film

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I mean everyone likes Seven Samurai, but it's a feel-good action/adventure movie. It just has lots of fluff to give all of the samurai and main peasants characterization, whereas later movies that copied it would forego most of that, and give the antagonists more screentime.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              don't get me wrong, I still love Seven Samurai. I just think Kurosawa made better films

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They do this with Spielberg too by putting Jaws on the list rather than any of his later movies. Jaws is great, but I think Jurassic Park is better.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              >feel-good
              You never actually watched this movie, did you?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                It's a good ending even though some of the samurai and peasants die in battle.

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >#29

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Are you zoomers actually this moronic?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Millennials and zoomers don't even watch movies anymore. If they do it's only capeshit. The very idea that black and white movies could be considered classics is insulting to them.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Millennial here. Please don't group me in with moronic capeshitters. I've probably seen more b&w films than 90% of Cinemaphile combined

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >I was born in the wrong generation

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            where did I say that? I've seen plenty of modern movies as well. I don't subscribe to the "new bad, old good" or "old bad, new good" trains of thought. a good film is a good film, regardless of when or where it was made

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              That's how you do it buddy.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        A lot of the old black and white movies, especially the ones people harp over are just stage dramas. They don't do anything interesting with the medium. I hardly consider them movies.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          The B&W movies on this list are overhwlmingly exactly the opposite of what you describe them as lmao. Start actually watching movies instead of larping on Cinemaphile, zoomer

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Maybe Tiktok and Twitch streams are more your speed.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >The very idea that black and white movies could be considered classics is insulting to them.
        lmao no one has ever implied this. I mostly watch black-and-white movies, but I think it's unfair to judge them on the same criteria as color movies the same way I don't judge silent movies against talkies.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Why?
          They were both being made at the same time.

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            Silent and B&W movies were handicapped by the technology and budgets available to them. I'm not saying silent and B&W movies are bad, but they are inferior to talkies and color movies on an objective technical level.

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              No.
              Orson Welles refused to film in color.
              John Huston filmed in b&w into the 60s.
              The greatest film of the 60s is b&w.
              The Coens made The Man Who Wasn't There in 2001.
              You should find a subject you have knowledge of, if such a thing exists, before you start pontificating.
              Pic related is 1974.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                You're confusing filming in B&W as a stylistic choice vs filming in B&W as a necessity based on what was available to the director. Or are you going to try tell me that movies like Seven Samurai or The Battle of Algiers wouldn't have been better in color?

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    k, I am gonna do it
    it better be better than edge of tomorrow

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    There is a reason why the film general is the worst general in this board.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      yes, the schizos and namegays. it used to be a good general, but it succumbed to the same fate as every other general. this is why generals are always a bad idea

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Vertigo
    Why is this so highly rated? There are several Hitchwiener kinos that are better, Rear Window, Psycho, Dial M for Murder, that one that looks like its all done in one take.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      I would guess
      >soundtrack
      >plot
      >composition and cinematography
      >universality of its theme (trying to make someone into something they're not) hidden among ghost story
      Rear Window is a great self-contained story and a well-made movie but that's it, ditto Dial M. Rope was just a gimmick with pisspoor acting as usual from Farley Granger. Psycho I do agree should be up there too, but its theme also isn't as universal

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >psycho
      literally his most overrated work and it doesnt hold up unlike vertigo

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Vertigo and Rope are both kino

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *