Has any other movie proved Cinemaphile wrong more than this?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Has any other movie proved?
Has any other movie proved Cinemaphile wrong more than this?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
captain marlel, black panther
>proved Cinemaphile wrong
In hindsight, it should have been obvious that a movie about one of the most popular capeshit villains would be a box-office success. Same thing with Joker.
I guess The Rock thought Black Adam would be as succesful as those two, but he forgot that Adam isn't popular at all.
I remember when people saying this would flop because
“who would watch a venom movie if it doesn’t have spiderman in it?”
Yep, but they were proven wrong
I wasn't wrong tho, it was shit. But like watchable shit where the joke was the movie, like the prequels.
This is one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Sony has no soul
It was a shitty movie where Venom is hardly in it
Chuddies were saying Spider-Verse would flop because it had Miles as the protag. History will repeat itself again with Spider-Verse 2
>spiderverse
>not a flop
Even Puss in Boots made more money than your shitty capeshit
Cope harder, chudcel
Sometimes I wonder if the proposed late 90's Venom movie would have been good, or at least cool
>Dolph Lundgren
Venom may have looked like ass but I bet it would have been cool at least.
Supposedly, the spider logo would have been used but explained by the symbiote coming from a planet full of giant spiders, and Carnage was to be the villain
>Venom may have looked like ass
It could've been decent
What is this
Movie called Split Second.
Venom with more practical effects could have been kino, if they relied on late 90s cg, not so much
>those fan trailers with Venom edited over Split Second footage
Fricking kino
accidentally linked the same video twice
Based
Looks like a gay porno
I'm more interested in what the 2009 Venom film with Topher Grace and Jim Carrey as Venom and Carnage would've been like.
>They had completed a draft by April 2009,[40] which included a role written specifically for Stan Lee,[41] and featured a sequence where the Venom symbiote jumps "from body to body [through a city], and each person that it inhabits ends up becoming really violent and striking someone else and then it jumps to [them]".[39]
>and featured a sequence where the Venom symbiote jumps "from body to body [through a city], and each person that it inhabits ends up becoming really violent and striking someone else and then it jumps to [them]".[39]
They replicated this in the music video.
They kinda do it throughout the movie with Venom and Riot though it's multiple scenes not one long sequence
Speaking of Riot, it is kind of a shame they gave him Carnage's gimmick of forming symbiote weaponry so when they did Carnage they had to make him frickhuge, have tentacles, and do a Tazmanian Devil spin to set himself apart
They even gave him Carnage's poses
It was kinda strange how the movie was, little human bodies basically floating in a giant symbiote mass
I guess you could say that's how it can be interpreted especially when Venom is frickhuge in the comics, but it also made it seem more like it was a body wrapping a lot of the time
I GOT THAT
ADRENALINE MOMENTUM VENOMMMMMMMM
That render of Venom looks so fricking goofy, it's the teeth all being in the front making them look like buck teeth
>Jim Carrey as Carnage
I know he’s done dramatic roles, but I would love to see Carnage act like Ace Ventura while he’s committing violent murders
I proved your mom last night tho.
Well, it was still shit but it was silly to think it would flop. Venom is Marvel's most popular villain/anti-hero. Sony are still morons for wanting to make other villain centric flicks when they just don't have the same pull. Just look at Morbius.
>Has any other movie proved Cinemaphile wrong more than this?
in what way?