https://deadline.com/2023/10/jonathan-majors-magazine-dreams-snow-white-elio-release-dates-1235585390/
All the dwarves are white and cgi
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
HD PICTURE OF SNOW WHITE 2025
https://deadline.com/2023/10/jonathan-majors-magazine-dreams-snow-white-elio-release-dates-1235585390/
All the dwarves are white and cgi
|
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Very obvious that’s it’s because of the backlash..this shit will be reversed in 18 months and we’ll be told this was a fake AI image
cope
It's very clearly a fake AI image and I will tell you that right now.
AI would look more realistic. This is Disney India rendering.
The state of kvetching and seething today, not only itt, but on every board. What a great past few weeks.
me on the right
That looks horrifying wtf is with that CGI
Pandering to rule 34. Those dwarfs are thick.
brown snow
How does one of the biggest and most profitable media companies in the world even release something that looks this bad?
They simply don't care anymore and outsource everything to Pajeetstanis.
But she's still not snow white. That doesn't actually fix or change the issue at all.
Well she is not Snow White, but she is American White so i guess it will have to do for now.
She's the "fairest" of them all in this version because she's a judge like Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and she hands out fair sentences to criminals. And no I'm not joking.
missed opportunity tbh. They should have made her white as snow and the little homies black as the night
>THE DWARVES ARE BACK GOY GO WATCH THE FRICKING FLICK
This.
It's still the same venous shit, just with a less blatant array of homosexualry. That and they realized how plain dumb the dwarves looked.
They added it after the backlash lmao
No they didn't. You know they didn't, and you know everyone else knows they didn't. So why continue the charade?
Because they added dwarves after the backlash, look at the pic that looks like a last minute homework
It looks like any other Disney blockbuster released. It looks no different from Little Mermaid or whatever. Who are you trying to kid?
You are a disney shill, you need to have a nice day immediately
>no answer
Here comes the flailing. So you're claiming that Pinocchio and Little Mermaid did not look like digital crap? That this is somehow an anomaly?
So you're claiming pic rel will look better in motion so it's worth white-knighting so hard? moron
Literally what are you talking about? Are you claiming that Pinocchio and Little Mermaid looked great and amazing, and NOT like soulless digital crap, and that this is an anomaly?
Do you even speak English?
how did you manage to take literally the exact opposite of what was said?
Woketards. Woketards never change.
so you're claiming Pinocchio and Little Mermaid looked visually amazing?
or you know, you mistook stand-ins on set for the actual final film because you know nothing about filmmaking and now you're trying to cling onto it
Okay filmmaker of Cinemaphile
>Zelger looks at and speaks to six foot stand ins for dwarves that are three feet tall
How the frick do you fix that in post?
Let me guess, she talked to their balls?
Anon, it wasn't even Zegler on the set. You could easily see it was not her. It's another stand-in, because it's an inconsequential walking shot.
>Disney says they moved away from Dwarves
>Disney explicitly clarifies only Zelger and her love interest are stand-ins in the pics
Anon how does it feel to take a big stinky poo and then have it smeared in your face?
https://www.tmz.com/2023/07/15/live-action-snow-white-swaps-dwarfs-dwarves-on-set-photos/#:~:text=Also%20worth%20noting%2C%20Disney%20has,weren't%20official%20film%20photos.
Why do you say they were "six feet tall" as opposed to the relative height of the different dwarfs? You can see in the OP Dopey is much shorter for instance.
...you realize they officially stated they weren't doing the dwarves because of Peter dink-holes comments, right?
And do you see humans with dwarfism in the image? Or do you see cartoon fantasy dwarves?
Oh, we're moving goal posts. I get it
Do you see humans with dwarfism in the image? Answer.
If they were meant to be stand-ins, they would be wearing green suits, dumb-frick.
They don't do that anymore. Having actual stand-ins wearing normal clothes allows CG artists and animators to replicate the lighting and movements much more easily.
Disney shills are pathetic. You forgot your company's PR team already confirmed that only Zegler and her not-love interest had stand-ins for those photos. Everyone else was part of the cast, hence them having been added to the movie's IMDB page.
Months later, Disney releases an image of the movie showing characters more closely resembling their original animated film. This movie wrapped filming in 2022 for an early 2024 release. It's now been pushed back an entire year. How moronic do you think we are to believe this movie isn't being extensively retooled in post? . If they were meant to be CG'd over in the first place, why aren't they wearing the tracking suits with those balls?
>Everyone else was part of the cast, hence them having been added to the movie's IMDB page.
source?
>If they were meant to be CG'd over in the first place, why aren't they wearing the tracking suits with those balls?
they're stand-ins, not creature actors.
You don’t CGI stand ins into costumes. Tell me one movie where entirely CGI character stand in was in full costume
see
Uh huh. Except for the stand-in Rocket doll they used.
Or the actual raccoon "actor" they also used for set references, Oreo.
Damn I wish to take this doll home and have sex with it.
that's not a stand-in. that's a creature actor in a green suit. and considering that's bautista in full make-up i bet this is during an actual shoot.
anon do you even know what a stand-in is?
It sure isn't 7 people of highly varied height to represent 7 CGI dwarfs
Are you claiming the dwarfs in the OP image are all the same height?
You're a terrible shill my friend. No but they're within the same height range as opposed to the real-life weirdos of the leaked vid
You mean, the stand-ins for the dwarfs? No shit, genius.
Kek you're even stupider than I assumed. Stand-ins have to be of similar height to the supposed cgi images you cretin
>Stand-ins have to be of similar height to the supposed cgi images you cretin
And they are. Look at the OP's dwarfs. They're not all the same height.
which they are?
No they're not dimwit, one of them was like 6 ft or something
And? Their height relative to each other is all that matters.
But Sean Gunn wasn't the "stand-in", he was the actual physical actor for Rocket on set.
Because it's a lighting reference image, hence why the actress is also a stand-in? Do you even know what a stand-in is?
Would you look at this from Avengers Ultron and ask why isn't it James Spader in a mocap suit?
Why did they get “diverse cast of stand ins. Black person, a woman, only one actual midget. If they were actual stand ins, they’d gotten midgets for reference. Not six foot Black person!
For two reason, first to have the obligatory "diverse cast", second to match their heights. You can notice they're all different heights in the OP image. Look how small Dopey is. Then look at the stand-ins and see they have one midget there. That's the Dopey stand-in.
>Everyone else was part of the cast, hence them having been added to the movie's IMDB page.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6208148/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm
Where?
nice try bob iger
now get back to work
apologize to desantis too
now CG her to look white
so instead of backtracking and hiring real dwarfs, they faked them instead? lmao
but they're not humans with dwarfism, they're fantasy dwarves, they always have been
So dwarf actors couldn't have played "fantasy dwarves"? Does that mean humans can't play fantasy elves then? They need to be fully cgi? Your Disney marketing skills are bad btw, consider another profession
That's no reason to make them look like some creepy monsters though.
They look like CG recreations of the original dwarfs. Of course they look like crap, Pinocchio looked like soulless CG recreating the original too, they still released it.
The ones trying to be photo realistic are even more soulless yet do better among the masses, like Lion King. They really are right about the goyim.
Nah, like in cap. Marvell context is everything. The lion king was very early in this wave and iirc right after beauty and the beast which made a ton of money thanks to little girls liking the og movie and Hermione.
I seriously doubt it would make the same money nowadays
The Lion King is the biggest traditional animated film of all time, of course it was going to do bank, it's an iconic movie people grew up with. Things like The Little Mermaid did well but they did nothing like the numbers Lion King did.
That guy who spammed the stand-in set pictures for months is actually going to cry when he sees this and realizes he wasted his time and will not get any more dopamine hits.
The film looks bad, but it's just a regular generic bad no one will remember. Not the shitpost central version people hyped up.
I was foolish enough to check the trending tweets and they're all praising this, I hate you homosexuals but I'll take Cinemaphile over anything else any day
Gee maybe it's a result of you blowing a gasket for like two months straight over the movie, that you now made it into a "thing" that you need to not be seen being critical off or you're lumped in with the incel clickbait youtuber crowd.
Do leftwingers like you really frequent Cinemaphile? like why? this is a chud board, your post sounds like it came copy pasted from reddit
>Gee! i uhm just wonder...
cope
>>snow white is supposed to be white lol
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST STATE THE OBVIOUS YOU'RE LITERALLY BLOWING A GASKET OVER NOTHING IM GOING TO SPEND LITERALLY HOURS ON A MONGOLIAN BARBECUE DISCUSSION WEBPHORUM DEFENDING The Walt Disney™ Company
she knows she's gonna mog her in 5 years
Wait a minute, that face...
>heh... Snow White?
> I haven't heard that name in a long time
isn't that because of some actual condition he has
Yes, replying to me ranting and raving will definitely not make you look moronic.
It's telling about how shit the normal world really is that this is your best outlet
>Poor Little Snow White Girl
The fact that Disney is bleeding money to such an extent that it's willing to scale back the woke to some extent it's pretty worrying for the economy.
It'll be the same story and everything with the only change being that she has to save the prince or some shit. It's what they've done with the previous live action adaptations
>dwarves
they're DWARFS
Horrendous and ironically also insulting to dwarfs
>dwarfs are white
>prince is black
They made the Huntsman black.
>snowbrown
>dwarves damage controlled in with cheap CGI
Disney is deader than I thought holy shit
They were stand-ins.
No they weren't. You don't make costumes for stand-ins like that if you're just going to CGI over them, and they weren't even wearing any tracking equipment.
if they're stand-ins, then the cameras weren't rolling, so why use tracking equipment. they had stand-ins for the principal actors too.
to check lighting and blocking and other stuff stuff probably
It does if you're merely doing a shot for lighting reference or blocking. They didn't have the main actress there either.
No. They knew this movie was going to
bomb. They now pushed it ‘25. Blaming the actors strike. No. Going to put CGI dwarfs in to try an salvage it. Especially after people ridiculed actual “dwarfs”
Or you know, they have literally no films in production right now and if they do not delay films they will have NOTHING in 2025?
They do that all of the time though. Especially for Marvel flicks.
>You don't make costumes for stand-ins like
uh yes you do, you need lighting references and blocking references
Yoda was CGI in AOTC, and was always going to be CGI, yet here's the physical model they had on set, they put some fangs on him as a joke for Christopher Lee.
Are you going to claim they BACKTRACKED and made Yoda CG in post-production only?
In the old picture the pronoun gang was dressed up as actual "dwarves", you don't do it with stand ins. This is capital D damage control, it's fricking over for the mouse
Why are you so obsessed with pretending your whining threads about the pictures "accomplished" something and made the big bad corporation change things? It's pretty cringe.
We're just making fun at this pathetic attempt at damage control and also making shills like you seethe HARD, board culture basically
damage controlled
They were always going to be CG recreations of the original dwarf designs. Same as the other Disney remakes like Pinocchio
Dwarfs exist irl, some of them being actors. Dinklage and Disney robbed them of their jobs and representation
No, humans with dwarfism exist. Fantasy dwarves do not exist.
Imagine being this autistically moronic. Go and tell dwarf actors that and see how they'll react
Tell them what? That because they are humans with stunted growth due to a genetic flaw, they should play fantasy dwarves?
As per their abundantly expressed wishes, yes-- because they're fricking actors you stupid imbecile
>They were always going to be CG recreations of the original dwarf designs
What happened to the diverse dwarfs?
total uncanny valley nightmare slop
didn't disney say the early pic was a misrepresentation? seems like they were right, they were probably just stand-in.
why would you dress up stand-ins like that? Shouldn't they be wearing green or blue or whatever? Why cast female stand-ins for male characters?
Height.
It wasn't even Rachel Zegler in the video.
Why do the stand-ins and stuntpeople always look better than the real actress? It happened to Gal Gadot too
Disney is in full rise of skywalker damage control mode
Bentkeybros, we've got Disney scared
>Snow "White"
>Is clearly israeli
>why is a mulatto playing snow white?
>LOOK, WE FIXED IT, SEE? THERE'S DWARVES NOW, AND THEY'RE ALL WHITE!
>....That wasn't the issue.
People were making outraged posts for months about how all the dwarves are now diverse and normal sized
People have been complaining since it was announced about the mulatto being cast as Snow White.
Why would they fix the issue? You are naive to think this was a mistake.
Snow white is an ethnic white european fairy tale about a woman who is beautiful because she is snow white. Of course the modern world is going to absolutely seethe over this and of course minorities would be absolutely screeching, shitting and pissing themselves in rage if they cast Mackenzie Foy. There would be BLM protests trashing the Disney headquarters like Chicago "teen" takeover.
Foy already worked for them too. This is how moronic the people running Disney really are.
Just like there were huge BLM riots when they had a white guy portraying Pharoah in that moses movie?
>disney actually made them dwarfs
>and STILL didn't use dwarf actors
everyone somehow lost
And you gays were throwing shit at Hobbit for bad CGI.
Reminder:
>Disney confirmed only Zelger and her love interest were stand ins that day
So the dwarves were the actual dwarves.
going to wait for the traditional conservative, israelite supporting, lib-owning, birch gold funded version, thank you very much
This looks just as moronic. People that got excited over this appear to only care that THIS Snow White is actually white, and that's such an epic troll move against the WOKE liberal mob. Thing is, that doesn't automatically assure the movie's going to be good.
no shit dumb frick
They pushed this piece of shit to ‘25 blaming the actors strike hahahaha
Chuds win once again.
Very nice digits.
Cinemaphile on suicide watch
can they CGI that offputting perma-smug look on her face??
Can they CGI her as white?
Snow white ain't so white anymore
If anyone believes they intended to use CGI dwarfs are morons. You don’t dress up CGI stand in costumes. You don’t hire “diverse” cast for stand in. They would’ve had actual midgets in green suits with censors.
yeah you do, for reference, but sure go ahead and schizzo out and say they animated 7 different dwarves in full CGI in 2 months
They've just pushed this movie back an entire year and this shot is literally the only official shot they've released. Yes, a multi-billion dollar corporation can get some CG stills done in 3 months.
I really hope Disney's paying you.
They also delayed Elio a year. Are you claiming that is being "overhauled thanks to us heroic badass rebels on Cinemaphile"? Or is it because they have no films in production right now due to the strike, and thus have nothing for 2025 right now?
Who says that one isn't getting retooled either? Elio is almost certainly not finished yet, but Snow White has been in post since September 2022 and this is literally the first picture from the movie that we've seen.
>Who says that one isn't getting retooled either?
So the default must be to claim retools as opposed to studios are worried about having no films ready in 2025 because they've had nothing in production since the SAG strike started?
In some cases, yes? While I'd agree that studios don't want an empty 2025 slate, pushing things due for release in a few months just means their 2024 slate will be light. I don't think they'd want that either.
Better a light slate in 2024 and a light slate in 2025 than a full slate in 2024 and nothing whatsoever in 2025.
Why do you keep going on about midgets? They were never going to be human dwarfs, they're fantasy dwarves. Like Gimli.
I mean it's painfully obvious those guys were the "dwarves" and disney backtracked when the pictures leaked and they became a laughing stock, as you said actual stand ins would be wearing jeans not costumes. It's over
>alt-right chuddies are so powerful they are literally bossing around a multibillion dollar company
literally this, theyre the ones with jobs and money not scraping by with a barista job tweeting for tomorrow to be the start of communism and UBI
samegay
we got a mad one over here
Normies are getting tired of this bullshit too, chuds are based and disney got bullied by them but it was the tiktok trends making fun of the movie what changed their minds
There's still a big turd in the middle of the picture. Not much improvement.
there's no way I'm going to be gaslit into thinking this was the plan all along.
Why?
Delayed ONE YEAR
Kek
What a shitshow
Weird? Weird
we were just wrong bros, I think it's the bigger man's move to just admit it and move on... let's just all write an apology letter.
dear
>Snow White
>She isn't White
Couldn't care less about the dwarves stop gaslighting me Disneed you fricking queers.
>magic mirror on the wall, who's the fairest one of all?
>see this
>uhm i couldn't have been wrong, t-they changed their minds from the backlash!
>it's stand-ins trust me!
*Disney says the only stand ins were snow white and the prince*
>...
Sorry shills, but even the House of Mouse is against you.
>*Disney says the only stand ins were snow white and the prince*
i suppose technically that's true, since they're the only ones from the cast in that scene, since the dwarfs are cgi. unless the creature performers count, i don't think they're billed as part of the cast.
>performers aren't part of the cast
Sure thing.
I usually clarify that only two-stand ins were present when the rest of the people present don't matter.
And I also wouldn't label the other people as creature performers. I'd just leave their titles blank.
So my official statement would be
>Among all of these people, two are stand-ins for the main cast
and this obviously means the rest of the people aren't a part of the main cast.
Concession accepted. No value was added, therefore you have none to give.
do you have the disney press release about all this? i've never seen it i think.
Look it up.
>Disney clarifies set photos
TMZ has an article on it that sums it up quick.
You're coping, terribly.
You are coping terribly, Disney shill
A delay won't make it not shit
Whether it will be bad is not the argument. Of course it will be bad, just like all the other remakes. That doesn't mean you can play moron and pretend
>giga corporation so powerful that the government
allowed them to have benefits similar to the ones the church has
>bends the knee to a rag tag of incel forum losers
how did weaponized autistic lonely men become this powerful?
Because it never happened.
>NOOOOOOO IT DIDN?T HAPPENS WHAT MY EYES ARE SEEING HAPPENING LITERALLY RIGHT NOW
Further proof of how powerful they are. They are manipulating this dude's head right this moment. They are like Professor X.
what the frick was that other snow white thing with the people walking through a field then??
Before they got backlash they had two stand ins for Snow White and The Prince and then the official dwarf cast.
After the pics got released they pushed the movie to 2025 so they could digitally alter them.
>then the official dwarf cast.
Prove it
I don't have to. Disney already did.
Curious how you can't prove anything yourself
they fricked up and now we have ps2 tier dwarfs
You ignored this earlier so I'll ask you again, are you claiming that Dumbo and Mulan and Pinocchio all had flawless effects and this is an anomaly?
the poster count didnt go up when i posted , schizo
I know that
they were clearly stand-ins
full sized stand-ins wearing full costume for CGI dwarves? That does not even make sense moron.
i'm not the moron, they often wear costumes for stand-ins
So they paid for costumes for the stand-ins that look completely different than what the cgi dwarves wear. And also took the time to hire 1 actual dwarf as a stand-in despite not intending them to have any actual screen time. And also released photos of the stand-ins for some reason as promo material. Makes sense. moron.
>And also released photos of the stand-ins for some reason as promo material.
They did? Where?
yeah i'm sure disney couldn't afford some rags for the stand-ins.
The point is that the clothes should at least look similar. Also, nowadays stand-ins are basically green fabric and mocap bearers. No fricking way they wear full detailed clothing
>Also, nowadays stand-ins are basically green fabric and mocap bearers.
no they aren't, those are creature actors, not stand-ins.
No, moron. If they STAND IN the place were the cgi character is suposed to be, it saves a frickton of work for the CG artist to have something to work from
Anon could you just admit you don't actually know what a stand-in is, and that you're just making up an assumption based on the words? We already know.
Tell me then, and explain btw why they should wear a full set of clothing instead of cgi-friendly stuff
cgi-friendly stuff is used for when they are actually shooting the movie, see here
here we see a guy in a green suit, and greenscreen in the background, so the cg guys have something to work with when animating the models and putting in the cgi background and whatnot
stand-ins are not used in the actual shooting, but during rehearsals, checking the lighting and camera blocking etc, like this stuff
there is no need for the extra cgi-friendly stuff during this, but it's useful to dress up accordingly, or at least somewhat
that's my two cents at least.
Even easier, here's Rocket's stand-in doll, with Sean Gunn right next to it in his blue suit.
>stand-ins are not used in the actual shooting, but during rehearsals, checking the lighting and camera blocking etc, like this stuff
Whoa, can't believe they recast Spader for this chump #
there is no need for the extra cgi-friendly stuff during this, but it's useful to dress up accordingly, or at least somewhat
In that case you want similar clothes, similar height, and in the case of the horribly deformed and huge darfs in OP picture, cg friendly suits because they are so fricking big that you can't control camera blocking with normal actors
>In that case you want similar clothes
how are the clothes that dissimiler really? some of the colors are off i guess, but doesn't seem like a big deal. some different combinations of shirts/jackets like the dwarfs, plus some different hats.
but yeah i also think a bunch of midgets would make more sense, maybe they didn't care that much for this scene.
Where's James Spader in his mocap suit anon?
Are you trying to agree with me ir something? He is clearly wearing all that so the cg artist can work from it. The csse with the darf actors would be more similar to him wearing a oktober fest suit
>He is clearly wearing all that so the cg artist can work from it
Almost like a lighting and blocking reference or something?
>they STAND IN the place were the cgi character is suposed to be
Kek
Stop embarrassing yourself already
Who says they don't wear clothes like that in that random scene? You're the guy looking at some random candid video of some people walking on set, none of whom are even the actors, and adhering to it as ABSOLUTE GOSPEL THAT CAN NEVER BE QUESTIONED.
Is time to stop posting anon-kun, you are just embarrasing yourself
>none of whom are even the actors
They were the actors though, that's why they were on costume, diverse and had a token dwarf. Cope away all you need, disney lost and chuds won
Prove it.
See
That's a picture of stand-ins in a field.
Keep the damage control, but everyone knows these were real actors until disney got mocked to death by it
So why haven't they recast Rachel Zegler if they're apparently listening to the Internet now?
Because she is the main lead, they would fricking do if they could.
That makes no sense. She has had the brunt of the complaints. Why hasn't she been recast? Why are you so desperate to believe they're "changing" the movie because of you? Do you really believe you know everything because you saw one candid video of some people in a field? How do you make conclusions based off such a tiny sliver?
Sureeee
Captain marvel was released with similar complains, and she fricking got a second movie.
Disney firing a woman of color because 'racist trolls' forced them to do so would create infinite salt and go against everything the company has promoted during in the last 2 decades. I fricking wish they did.
>Captain marvel was released with similar complains, and she fricking got a second movie.
uh yeah cos her movie made a billion dollars
Have you seen the projections for the sequel?
Yes, because things have changed since 2019. What is your point?
>new, apparently super important character sandwiched in between the conclusion of a highly acclaimed decades old saga
>b..but it made a billie...
We all fricking know why it made a billion. Check how much they expect for the second one
Are you ALWAYS on? You can't even hear the b word without rushing into unrelated cope mode.
How did you get so good at spotting your enemies online?
perhaps he is also always on
are you saying you don't flip out any time it is ever mentioned that Captain Marvel starring Brie Larson did a billion dollars after years of doom and gloom claims from angry youtubers?
If a movie does a billion dollars, a sequel being greenlighted is logical.
I can't wait for images of some actors in mocap suits to appear and you just keep spamming the same image from the field over and over trying to convince yourself.
Why that should change anything? Of course they need mocap actors now that they had to change direction.
Is that argument preparing for future criticism?
>Of course they need mocap actors now that they had to change direction.
Anon, they can't film anything right now because there's a SAG strike on. That's why they're delaying films, because there's nothing in production and hasn't been for months, meaning they have no films that will be ready in 2025. Films for 2024 are in post-production and can happen more or less, 2025 is being shot to shit right now.
Pretty sure this imsge does, but continue to live in denial, set photo spinner.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6208148/fullcredits?ref_=tt_cl_sm
Where are they?
Are they "full-sized"? Or are they the relative height of the dwarfs next to each other?
Those were the dwarves but the picture leaked and everybody thought it looked like shit so they're backtracking and damage controlling hard, many such cases
Stand-ins, not representative of the actual film.
>standins without the green suit
Anon do you even know what a stand-in is?
Whoa, can't believe they recast Spader for this chump
stand in cut when??
AI generated a better looking Snow white in 5 seconds.
Can they CGI her white as well
Again. Tell me why had a diverse cast for the dwarfs in full costume
if were just going to be CGI’d? If they were planning cartoon dwarfs they would’ve used little kids or actual dwarfs as stand in.
>a bunch of Cinemaphile incels bullied disney into spending millions in shit CGI and delaying a $200 million movie one year
I fricking KNEEL
You'll find that this site tends to be the cultural nexus for some fricked up reason.
What the frick was this then?
>all in costume
Uhhh shillsisters????????????
See
It happens
Oh my god he is in COSTUME
Probably discarted after the backslash and general mockery
Exactly. They were clearly actors doing dress rehearsals but were discarded after the backlash
Stand-ins. Moviemaking is a silly process.
Yeah, no. Stand-ins in all different colors anf even a darf? No fricking way. Also, clothes are way too detailed for that
>Stand-ins in all different colors anf even a darf?
....what?
I remember when Disney first said the images were fake and then retracted it, kek.
They said it's not representative of the final film, which was true.
Before that they said it was fake.
Look it up.
They said it was not representative of the film. Which it isn't.
i hope they shill for you at your funeral
The actual studio issued a correction saying they were stand-ins
>ESG tier diverse cast
>dressed up as actual characters
Yeah those were the actual dwarves and disney bent the knee, not two ways around it. They should probably just can this shit and eat the cost, you know save face a little
Wasn't this for a completely unrelated music video?
Same energy
they look weird
So let me get this straight. Woke Disney hired divers cast of stand ins with the intent of them being replaced by white cartoon dwarfs. Same looking dwarfs from
movie which lead actress shits on! Actual cartoon, exaggerated feature dwarfs that butthole Dinklage was b***hing about.
Sorry, don’t buy it. This is major overhaul to not have another massive bomb
Get a white woman to play Snow White and I'll take my kids to see it. Until then frick off
it is best to keep them away from mainstream media at this point, I let them play some games on roblox and some YT videos, but nothing by big corpos
chuds in absolute control
Holy shit...
They just can't stop fricking up.
>Publicly announce they won't be using dwarf actors because King Dwarf said so
>Set photos get leaked of a mishmash of nogs, spics, and homosexuals
>Public ridicule pours in
>They say it isn't real. . . less than a day later they say it is, but it's only stand-ins.
>Let that hairy-backed monkey out of her cage only to tank what little good will the public still had left by opening her mouth.
>Scramble to put together a promo showing that you are now using CGI dwarves, thereby pissing off the morons who said it was exploitative AND the people pulling for dwarf actors to have a gig.
>Zegler is still center frame.
>Didn't just eat shit on a poorly conceived, ruinously executed bad idea that only exists now as fodder for how far Disney has fallen since they were run by a Nazi sympathizer.
This couldn't be any funnier if they tried. In fact, it's probably better that they don't. They'd just frick it up.
>it's an anon writes out a fantasy about how his cool badass rebel posting beat up the meany megacorp
so you've heard of me. . .
I'm even cooler than I thought!
...do you guys literally not know what stand-ins are? they're not the guys in the green suits.
this is embarrassing
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Jfc the shills are out in full-force on this one. That's why the "stand-ins" were all different heights, skin tones, and not wearing the costumes displayed in the set photos. You're talking to autists who obsess over tv and film. We know what stand-ins are for, esp CGI stand-ins. They usually have suits on to motion-capture. You're a shitty human being and should kys, Rajeesh.
And yet this guy had no idea they had
a stand-in doll in the Rocket outfit, and a raccoon actor used for reference
You don't seem to know what a stand-in is at all, and seem to think we're talking about mo-cap suits for creature actors.
It doesn't explain away different skin tones, costumes, etc for reference. Wouldn't they use kids or dwarves to be stand-ins for 3-ft tall dwarves? What would any of this help the production or make CGI easier? Wouldn't that create even more of a mess during CGI production? You're a fricking shill idiot talking out their ass and your condescending tone doesn't make you right.
Skintones don't matter in that shot. Any more than the guy wearing a parka here matters in his shots. Was Ultron wearing a parka in the movie?
But why not hire kids or midgets for perspective? What’s point in making costumes for stand ins who are all except
midget bigger than Snow White? Doesn’t make any sense. They used a tennis ball
on a string for a stand in for Scooby Do so actors knew where to look. Got stand ins that tower over Snow White
>They used a tennis ball
>on a string for a stand in for Scooby Do so actors knew where to look
No, they used it for shots of when they are looking at Scooby. You keep assuming all images on a film set must be the same. Look at Rocket above. Sean Gunn played him in scenes on set, but they also had a real raccoon "actor" for references and a 1:1 size doll of Rocket for references. Not every single thing put in front of a camera is in the final film.
ok, if you think most woke company in entertainment planned on using all
white big nose, big ears dwarfs from
the start. Cool. I don’t. If they were originally going to be CGI they would’ve be “diverse” CGI dwarfs. You also would’ve be having mail actress shitting on the original movie when going to use original dwarfs. Weird. Weird
you're actually one of the guys he's talking about kek
>esp CGI stand-ins. They usually have suits on to motion-capture
You have no idea what a stand-in is.
The left lost the culture war.
Wait I'm thinking Larry Fink came out and said they weren't going to bankroll more wokeflops or some shit, am I remembering this right? This would explain this EMBARRASSING damage control
>You are... white as snow
Sauce?
The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm (1962)
Thank you very much, anon!
Watch it in Smilebox form for extra fun
So when Snow White is looking up at much taller Black person stand in, how do you justify logic of having stand ins taller than Snow White when they were supposedly going to be CGI
>So when Snow White is looking up at much taller Black person stand in, how do you justify logic of having stand ins taller than Snow White
Do you have a set photo of this occurring? Or are you again just basing everything off one random video like it's the be all and end all of the entire production?
>Orders Disney to stop hiring midgets to play dwarves because it's offensive and no midget should ever play a midget.
>Except for him, he's the only midget who's allowed to play midgets because he considers himself a tall man
still doesn't excuse the beaner yellow actress as Snow WHITE
Hope they spend the extra year and a half making the CGI better.
I love how disney keep paying shills tonpush their shit. Like it is going to change anyone's opinion in this shithole
This is legit one of the few threads possible made by and certainly riddled with shills. Their damage control attempt is as obvious as it's pathetic
*possibly
Kek
Stop digging yourself a deeper hole you idiot
>outrage baiting /misc/lacks are now pretending that stand-ins don't exist to try and act like they made Disney do something
lol
7 midgets are out of a job because lefties had a moral panic lmao. And somehow CGI'ing these caricatures will be more acceptable than actually giving little people work.
I thought it got canned?
>delayed ONE YEAR
That's what it amounts to
Looks like Polar Express, this is nightmare fuel.
Not buying any of this. Disney replacing woke cast of “dwarfs” for cartoon Dwarfs. The same cartoon dwarfs that Dinklage was b***hing about and which Disney said they would not use.
>The same cartoon dwarfs that Dinklage was b***hing about
That's not what he complained about at all. He complained about using little people actors as fantastical dwarves.
I guess the backlash was too much
Imagine, people in this thread right now are doing this for free
>extra year of reshoots and replacing physical actors with cg for the entire movie
the production budget on this movie is going to be crazy, that's not even including the amount of interest and inflation that's going to frick over its ROI
>extra year of reshoots and replacing physical actors with cg for the entire movie
They can't reshoot anything because of the SAG strike, dummy. There's no film production happening.
Idiots. The whole reason the movie is being delayed along with others is because they can't film anything right now and they're going to have a gigantic hole in about 18 months.
If you think woke Disney had planned on pic relating being the Dwarfs after telling Dinklage they wouldn’t use dwarfs, you’re a moron
They're not using "little people". Those aren't humans with dwarfism, they're fantasy dwarves like in LOTR.
What I like about this is it pushes the budget up, and that causes the bomb to be bigger
>be dwarf
>7 roles literally open up
>Peter God Emperor of Dwarves Dickletface tells disney dwarves on movies are racism and the roles are cut
>3 years later they CGI dwarves on the movies anyway
LMAOOOOOO
why did they only hire one dwarf as a stand in for a CGI dwarf?
Notice how the dwarves in OP's pic are all different heights like in the post production photos
But they aren't? There are three visible dwarfs, and we have no reason to assume that the ones behind her just aren't standing on a bench because we don't see their feet.
Test photo had 1 (uno) irl dwarf. What were they testing? Definitely not height or costumes. There is zero correlation between profiles.
Dopey is very obviously tiny in comparison to the rest, look at him. That's who the dwarf was standing in for.
Again, others aren't full-sized. And if you are actually going to tell me with a straight face that the difference between Grumpy and Dopey is the same difference between an irl dwarf and a regular man, you are fricking out of your mind on copium. There is nothing "relative" here to the test photo; it's a maximum one-head difference.
I don't make conclusions based off one photo. It's clear there that Dopey is tiny, but it's not clear how tall they are relative to each other because they're sitting around a table. Luckily, this won't be the only image ever released of the film so we will see the height differences at some point.
If you want to base everything you know off a single zero-context set picture, you can, but you're going to be tarring everything with the same brush.
>I don't make conclusions based off one photo
But you do?
>Dopey is very obviously tiny in comparison to the rest
No, he isn't. Why are you drawing a conclusion? The whatever dwarf on the right side of him who is sitting sideways probably isn't going to be three times larger than him. So they definitely weren't testing heights there, with one fricking dwarf, especially because Snow White was also there, so the whole purpose would be to test the heights relative to her also. How would you do that with full-grown men?
One, because Dopey already was the smallest in the original, and two because he's visibly smaller. Look at his head and shoulders next to who I assume is Happy, he looks like a child.
On second thought that's probably Doc, not Happy.
You asked why there is a midget in that set picture, and there's Dopey, who is tiny.
But he isn't tiny. There is a maximum head difference between the ones standing in the foreground and him. This isn't relative to a dwarf vs. a normal person. What is this psychotic coping about them having a dwarf to test Dopey?
Are you actually pretending the one behind him isn't standing on a bench either? Providing that head difference? Again, not dwarf vs. normal person?
I'm talking about their head and shoulders. You are trying to tell me those are the same sizes? Again, Dopey was the smallest in the original film as well, he was like the kid of the seven.
And none of that is relative to a dwarf vs. human size. None. What were they testing? The sizes aren't comparable.
None of this has anything to do with shit. They're not relative to a human, they're stand-ins for the dwarves, they only need to be relative to each other.
Then the heights aren't relative then? Only completely disproportionate CGI head sizes?
Their height relative to EACH OTHER, dummy.
Because he was standing in for Dopey, who is really short.
cos they're not all the same height
maybe he's the little guy, he looks smaller than the others
i don't even know if the characters were done at the time of the stand-in pic
That's Dopey, clearly, he has no beard.
Why have diverse cast of stand ins if they were going to be replaced by white dwarfs? Photos were leaked which Disney denied where real. So nobody even know they hired a nogger, Hispanic and woman dwarf stand in.
You keep repeating this over and over. It's for their heights, and to have a diverse set like is obligatory for Disney now.
if a union actor stand-in on-set is ultimately replaced by a CGI entity with a different ethnicity, is that not grounds for a lawsuit?
So that Disney could satisfy their diversity quota for employment. They make themselves feel better by saying "LOOK, we have a diverse group working behind the scenes on this film!"
>Photos were leaked which Disney denied where real.
They made a correction saying they were stand ins
>disney having use diverse non visible actors to adhere to a quota
Lmao. Disney makes the fricking quotas. if the backslash wasnt so brutal, even if the darfs were originaly gci, there is no way they will all be white and male
They make the quotas based off corporate numbers for this and that to show shareholders and fill out charts.
I'm pretty sure disney's shareholders are more than fed up with te quotas, it is all on Iger and his hand picked governing council
Why not? If the purpose is to capture lighting and blocking while keeping heights relative, their race or gender doesn't matter.
so how come you never responded to any of the stand-ins posted in the thread that contradicted your claim that they never ever have costumes?
Because they were the actors, ignore the coping shills it's so obvious it's just not worth to discuss with a dishonest pajeet about it
>trust me guys, this photo of diverse people with high quality, tailored unique clothing that would have cost wardrobes 10s of thousands to produce are just random stand ins for this one scene, they also have perfect hair styling just because lol
>high quality, tailored unique clothing that would have cost wardrobes 10s of thousands to produce
lol
LOL
Yes TENS OF THOUSANDS
clearly the finest of louis vuitton rags
i get the short one for dopey and then the others varying a bit in height, but why the giant in the back?
Maybe one of the dwarfs is really tall compared to the rest. It's hard to tell in the OP because they're mostly sitting.
yes, tailored clothing on movies is extremely expensive because of how labor intensive it is since they have to make multiples of the same set of clothing for each character by hand
Dude, you're not going to convince ANYONE that those are expensive costumes.
costumes always look better on film, it's movie magic
Snowwhat and the lumpenproletariat
>this photo of diverse people with high quality, tailored unique clothing that would have cost wardrobes 10s of thousands to produce are just random stand ins for this one scene
They've been doing this for a very long time though.
Even in pic related they cover up Spider-Man in CG
Imagine the tightness of his warm welcoming butthole.
Where is all this "perfect hair styling" and "high quality tailored clothing"? Did you see the same images I did?
Even Screenrant thinks the delay is so cav replace “magical creatures”‘ for CGI dwarfs
> With this most recent Snow White image, Disney has seemingly pivoted away from the magical creatures. While the Snow White casting damage has already been done, as a CGI dwarf is not an inclusive step in the way that casting an actor with dwarfism would be, it seems Disney is trying to listen to critical responses. With the recent news of Snow White’s delay from March 22, 2024, to March 21, 2025, the live-action remake still has many months to reinvent itself.
https://screenrant.com/snow-white-live-action-remake-rachel-zegler-dwarves-image-disney/
>screenrant
> Then, it was revealed the seven dwarfs would be replaced by seven “magical creatures” in the Snow White remake.
when was this revealed exactly?
Right after Dinklage shit and phots leaked
https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/disneys-live-action-snow-white-30500373.amp
How does this support the claim in the thread that they're just some random people from a set photo? If anything it contradicts it by confirming they're going to be fantasy beings, not humans. So they're going to be like fae creatures and NOT be called dwarves in the film to avoid the implication that they're humans with dwarfism.
so why is "magical creatures" in quotes, did disney say this somewhere? where
https://www.thewrap.com/snow-white-peter-dinklage-disney-response/
>Instead of dwarfs, Disney will fill the void with a group of what they describe as “magical creatures,” according to casting sheets that TheWrap has seen. (They are currently looking for voice actors to give these creatures personality.) It’s unclear if they will inhabit the same roles as the dwarfs
So basically, the casting sheet never says "dwarves", it says "magical creatures". In other words they're not going to be called dwarves in the film. It seems there was an assumption this must mean they're going to be fairies and unicorns and shit, and Screenrant are surprised they just look like the dwarves, but calling them "magical creatures" in the casting sheet doesn't mean they aren't going to be CG recreations of the original dwarves, just never called "dwarves".
Either way, it's very obvious those set pic stand-ins were never the final dwarves from the film.
so it's doc and his merry band of not-dwarves
But you didn't claim they would be "magical creatures", you claimed they would be some random adult men and women. Screenrant is referring to Disney's response to Dinklage's ranting about dwarf actors where they said
>“To avoid reinforcing stereotypes from the original animated film, we are taking a different approach with these seven characters and have been consulting with members of the dwarfism community. We look forward to sharing more as the film heads into production after a lengthy development period,”
Fairly empty PR speaking, but the magical creatures talk does not come from Disney themselves, but this excerpt from a news story
>Disney will fill the void with a group of what they describe as “magical creatures,” according to casting sheets that TheWrap has seen. (They are currently looking for voice actors to give these creatures personality.)
It seems to me that they will be fantasy dwarfs in the film, but probably they will not actually be called "dwarfs" in the film to avoid any implication that they're humans with dwarfism, rather than a fantasy being.
I don’t get logic of caving into Dinklage and not hiring midgets. Instead use original cartoon dwarfs which are more offensive. Not only are they all white, they have a exaggerated features, big noses, big dumbo ears, stupid names. If this wasn’t woke ass Disney, i’d think it was troll job on Dinklage
>Instead use original cartoon dwarfs which are more offensive.
why? they're not humans, they're fantasy dwarves
Midgets use to be called dwarfs until deemed offensive. Not just “fantasy” it’s characterization of midgets. Just like pic related is one of Asians. Disney so woke I find it hard to believe they not aware of that.
Clearly they have decided that by never calling them dwarves, perhaps even having a line in the film calling them something else, they can make it clear these are not midget humans but a different fantasy species.
that doesn't say anything like what morons in this threads are claiming
>even the shillest shills are giving up and admitting the woke dwarfs were CGI'd because of the backlash
Disney is done for, they're tired and they're weak. They'll have to make good movies to survive, eventually
That Screenrant quote does not say they are changing them to dwarves at all. It says they don't look like "magical creatures" like they were referred to in the call sheet.
Or are you going to claim some random people in a field are now "magical creatures"?
/ourgirl/ grace already confirmed the delay is due to adding in dwarves and hiring new VAs to voice them
$300m production budget
$500m after marketing
0% chance of profit
>$300m production budget
>$500m after marketing
>0% chance of profit
fake news
Here’s the facts. Disney was going to use diverse cast of midgets. Than Dinklage. So changed it to the supposed “stand ins” we saw. Disney said dwarfs now be “magical creature.” The photos leaked and were ridiculed. Disney denied they were real and than admitted they were. They decided again change direction and make dwarfs CGI. Disney needs a win especially with Snow Whitt. It’s first Disney princess
The cgi looks like shit, but the aesthetic is nice and she looks cute in comparison
Are you high? The place looks dark and empty. The darfs are sub-human aberrations that must be purged, not funny goofy harmless creatures. Snow brown is ugly as a sin, specially with a dress that is a 1/1 copy of the animation, maybe they should hire fricking cosplayers, at lesdt they know how to adapt costumes to real life
I didn't think disney would put out another nuclear level bomb so quickly after indiana jones 5, they'd probably make more money just releasing the movie as is direct to streaming
>live action
>but not for actors who are little people
>they can starve
Disney into eugenics now?
>Disney into eugenics now?
they always have been and they also dont want us in the gene pool
And if they planned on CGI dwarfs why do they look like the original. This is Disney. You’d have atleast one Black person dwarf. A woman dwarf. At the very least
>all dwarves are white
>disney not scoring diversity points by hiring nonwhite celebs to voice act minor roles like they do with every movie
the fact there isn't a polynesian dwarf for taika to voice act means something is definitely going on
Who says they won't have diverse VAs? Non-whites can voice whites just fine.
literally the biggest drama in the voice acting scene now is that the rules are that you can only cast a VA based on the race of the character, which includes whites
black and asian VAs are complaining about it on twitter since the only scripts they're allowed to get are for their races since they can't voice white characters anymore
No, it's a one way street
wait wait wait
https://videopress.com/v/AT4aKu8f
why was this memoryholed here
because SHUT UP I BEAT DISNEY PERSONALLY DAMMIT