So did most of the Pixar production team when they were kids. The only Andy on Toy Story's crew was John Lasseter and that facade of wholesomeness disappeared.
Maybe, but honestly he designed some badass looking hybrid toys. If not for his silly "I'm a wacky surgeon!" gimmick, he was just being creative. The worst thing he did was frick with his sister.
I think that's what Sid benefited the most from this film. He seemed to have more screen time and better shots than Andy because human characters looked off when animating with the tech at the time, so Sid just works better for animating a disturbed child.
At the very least he was fully aware that he stole his sister's toys. Also, while I would not completely fault him for taking Buzz and Woody, he should be aware that he has a kid neighbor and a decent kid's first instinct after finding some nicer toys knowing that other kids are in the neighborhood would be to check if they were lost.
>a decent kid's first instinct after finding some nicer toys knowing that other kids are in the neighborhood would be to check if they were lost.
Oh please as if any of us would've done this back when we were kids. I'm sorry to tell you this but no kid would give up the opportunity to own a nice toy just because there's a chance that the neigbor's kid lost it. Kids naturally follow the rule of "Finders Keepers"
Kids who followed the rule of finders keepers were rightfully left out of playing with any of the other neighborhood kids where I lived. For a social reject like Sid that would not matter, but for the most part kids like to hang around other kids and acting like a homosexual and claiming other people's property because ""I found it" was a quick way to never be invited to anything.
Kids who followed the rule of finders keepers were rightfully left out of playing with any of the other neighborhood kids where I lived. For a social reject like Sid that would not matter, but for the most part kids like to hang around other kids and acting like a homosexual and claiming other people's property because ""I found it" was a quick way to never be invited to anything.
This whole discussion is null because that’s not what happens in the movie. He gets them out of a claw machine game, as far as anyone is concerned they’re his. Nobody would have any reason to think they’re not. He’s not a thief in this case, and he’s not playing “finders keepers”
>he should be aware that he has a kid neighbor and a decent kid's first instinct after finding some nicer toys knowing that other kids are in the neighborhood would be to check if they were lost
At the very least he was fully aware that he stole his sister's toys. Also, while I would not completely fault him for taking Buzz and Woody, he should be aware that he has a kid neighbor and a decent kid's first instinct after finding some nicer toys knowing that other kids are in the neighborhood would be to check if they were lost.
oh yeah, frick, thought he found them in his yard or something. It has been a long time since I have seen Toy Story. Still should not have taken his sister's toys though.
And it’s not even true. You see the pre-schoolers in Toy Story 3 and the Barbie with the painted face in Toy Story 2. You even see Andy have a broken toy, his penguin with a squeaker. Jesse getting abandoned by her kid too. Toy Story’s universe is literally our universe but with sentient toys, the nature of how kids play isn’t any different
>You see the pre-schoolers in Toy Story 3 and the Barbie with the painted face in Toy Story 2.
They didn't plan making sequels so they probably forgot >You even see Andy have a broken toy, his penguin with a squeaker. Jesse getting abandoned by her kid too.
That's not decapitating
Yeah, that's why Woody made such a big deal telling the broken toys they would have to break the rules this time, because it happens every tuesday.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Woody had them break the rules so he and Buzz could escape. If it was such an uncommon thing, the toys would have done it a long time ago.
How do you have trouble understanding a movie for six year olds?
2 years ago
Anonymous
>If it was such an uncommon thing, the toys would have done it a long time ago.
The toys were barely sentient with all the brain damage they suffered from Sid.
2 years ago
Anonymous
And yet the were able to fully carry our Woody’s plan, timed and acted to perfection. Crazy.
So you’re telling me the sequels aren’t canon, Sid doesn’t count because reasons, and Andy’s broken toys don’t count because “well he didn’t do it as bad as Sid did”?
Cool. I am not going to accept your fanon interpretation of the movie. Toy Story is set in the real world with the addition of sentient toys, human behavior doesn’t change and it’s not an alternate universe.
Do you know what PAC stands for? P A C - Program And Control. He's Program and Control-Man! The whole thing's a metaphor, he thinks he has free will but really he's trapped in a maze, in a system. All he can do is consume and he's pursued by demons that are probably just in his own head and even if he does manage to escape by slipping out one side of the maze: What happens? He comes right back in the other side. People think it's a happy game, it's a fricking nightmare world and the worst thing is that it's real and we live in it.
Nah, lots of kids grow out of this shit, I had a friend who tortured insects, he would often catch flies and pull their wings off (he knew the future of chip and dale I guess) and he's doing fine now, better than me even...
>Kid being as creative as he could, expressing it through his toys >No idea they were actually sentient >Gets horribly scarred in a traumatic experience >Ends up as a garbage man
Not knocking down garbage men, but Sid was a creative dude, he could've been working as a propmaker in a movie studio
Only stealing his sister’s toys and fricking them up. I don’t think Hannah actually decapitated her own dolls either which is kind of sad that every toy she gets her brother mangled up.
That said Sid is pretty extreme in how quickly he destroys his toys, though seeing his home life you can understand it. The dad’s a drunk that the dog’s afraid to approach and the mom screams across the house to get her kids’ attention.
He was kind of a dick to his sister
Also torturing things that are smaller and weaker than you at an age like that is a sign of psychopathy. Just ask Jeffrey Dahmer and Ted Bundy.
toys aren't living creatures
Still. Sid liked mutilating toys a little too much.
So did most of the Pixar production team when they were kids. The only Andy on Toy Story's crew was John Lasseter and that facade of wholesomeness disappeared.
Maybe, but honestly he designed some badass looking hybrid toys. If not for his silly "I'm a wacky surgeon!" gimmick, he was just being creative. The worst thing he did was frick with his sister.
Imaginary sadism is a red flag and vandalism is no better
He blew up a G.I. Joe not a hamster.
And started up a YouTube and is making tons of cash with little effort.
the guy that makes these guy is funny as frick
Only child detected
I have a sister. But even then I wasn't THAT dickish.
he was white and wore a punisher shirt
He's ugly
I think that's what Sid benefited the most from this film. He seemed to have more screen time and better shots than Andy because human characters looked off when animating with the tech at the time, so Sid just works better for animating a disturbed child.
He took something that wasn’t his.
how would he know the toys are andy's? does he even know andy?
At the very least he was fully aware that he stole his sister's toys. Also, while I would not completely fault him for taking Buzz and Woody, he should be aware that he has a kid neighbor and a decent kid's first instinct after finding some nicer toys knowing that other kids are in the neighborhood would be to check if they were lost.
>a decent kid's first instinct after finding some nicer toys knowing that other kids are in the neighborhood would be to check if they were lost.
Oh please as if any of us would've done this back when we were kids. I'm sorry to tell you this but no kid would give up the opportunity to own a nice toy just because there's a chance that the neigbor's kid lost it. Kids naturally follow the rule of "Finders Keepers"
Kids who followed the rule of finders keepers were rightfully left out of playing with any of the other neighborhood kids where I lived. For a social reject like Sid that would not matter, but for the most part kids like to hang around other kids and acting like a homosexual and claiming other people's property because ""I found it" was a quick way to never be invited to anything.
This whole discussion is null because that’s not what happens in the movie. He gets them out of a claw machine game, as far as anyone is concerned they’re his. Nobody would have any reason to think they’re not. He’s not a thief in this case, and he’s not playing “finders keepers”
>he should be aware that he has a kid neighbor and a decent kid's first instinct after finding some nicer toys knowing that other kids are in the neighborhood would be to check if they were lost
IMAGINE BEING THIS moronic
>decent kid's first instinct after finding some nicer toys knowing that other kids are in the neighborhood would be to check if they were lost.
He won them in the claw machine
oh yeah, frick, thought he found them in his yard or something. It has been a long time since I have seen Toy Story. Still should not have taken his sister's toys though.
It's the moronic chicken man who stole woody
You're thinking of Toy Story 2
He was a young artist. Unfortunately he happened to live in a universe where the materials he used to create his art were secretly sentient.
Toy Story takes place in an universe where most kids don't break their toys so yes he did
This is some absolute fricking smoothbrain logic. Just because some behavior is not common does not mean it is bad.
And it’s not even true. You see the pre-schoolers in Toy Story 3 and the Barbie with the painted face in Toy Story 2. You even see Andy have a broken toy, his penguin with a squeaker. Jesse getting abandoned by her kid too. Toy Story’s universe is literally our universe but with sentient toys, the nature of how kids play isn’t any different
>You see the pre-schoolers in Toy Story 3 and the Barbie with the painted face in Toy Story 2.
They didn't plan making sequels so they probably forgot
>You even see Andy have a broken toy, his penguin with a squeaker. Jesse getting abandoned by her kid too.
That's not decapitating
Nice goalpost shifting. Toy Story is literally just our world with sentient toys added. Human behavior is the same
Yeah, that's why Woody made such a big deal telling the broken toys they would have to break the rules this time, because it happens every tuesday.
Woody had them break the rules so he and Buzz could escape. If it was such an uncommon thing, the toys would have done it a long time ago.
How do you have trouble understanding a movie for six year olds?
>If it was such an uncommon thing, the toys would have done it a long time ago.
The toys were barely sentient with all the brain damage they suffered from Sid.
And yet the were able to fully carry our Woody’s plan, timed and acted to perfection. Crazy.
So you’re telling me the sequels aren’t canon, Sid doesn’t count because reasons, and Andy’s broken toys don’t count because “well he didn’t do it as bad as Sid did”?
Cool. I am not going to accept your fanon interpretation of the movie. Toy Story is set in the real world with the addition of sentient toys, human behavior doesn’t change and it’s not an alternate universe.
He started to kill kids that treat bad their toys after woody scared him
Do you know what PAC stands for? P A C - Program And Control. He's Program and Control-Man! The whole thing's a metaphor, he thinks he has free will but really he's trapped in a maze, in a system. All he can do is consume and he's pursued by demons that are probably just in his own head and even if he does manage to escape by slipping out one side of the maze: What happens? He comes right back in the other side. People think it's a happy game, it's a fricking nightmare world and the worst thing is that it's real and we live in it.
Supposedly
he was an incel
Dude he was 11
Apparently he chilled out by the time of Toy Story 3
*After at least half a million in therapy expenses
Nah, lots of kids grow out of this shit, I had a friend who tortured insects, he would often catch flies and pull their wings off (he knew the future of chip and dale I guess) and he's doing fine now, better than me even...
He heard his toys talk to him and threaten him.
That's schizophrenia.
lots of kids see/hear shit that aint there
A list of things that i've seen during my formative Years
-The ghost of a young girl
-a gigantic amber-colored spider
-The Krampus
i also had what i can only describe as 10 second psychotic break while i was trying to sleep
The amber spider was probably real, I'm one of them myself. Where did you live growing up? We may have crossed paths.
bro wtf how many legs you got?
> "everyone is in coma in psych ward" type theory
That's not schizephrenia. Single psychotic episode has nothing to do with actual feeling of schizophrenia.
>Dude he was 11
incels are born not made
incels ARE made
>Writers make Sid a garbage man thinking it's an insult
>Garbage men make $40+ an hour
Kek
This
Have fun with student dept Andy
They do? Only in Murrica I guess
>insult
They clearly depict him enjoying his job. Also $40/hr is a Cinemaphile meme. Average Garbage Man wage is half that.
>$40 an hour
Where? Certainly not in America. It depends on the State but the highest it tends to go is around ~$20/hr.
It really annoys me when TV/Movies "punish" a character by having them end up in a blue collar (or service/retail) type job.
At least one movie got it right
He didn't seem to mind his job very much
how do you know they were trying to punish him though, he clearly was having fun and he's supposed to be like what 19 maybe 20?
Somewhat
He turned out alright in the end if you go with the garbage man future.
reminder that the dog showed fear of Sid's father
Nothing bad actually happened to him either other than getting spooped out by a talking cowboy doll.
He has the hairline of a 40 year old.
Nah, that's just what a buzz cut does for you.
Morality is relative
>Kid being as creative as he could, expressing it through his toys
>No idea they were actually sentient
>Gets horribly scarred in a traumatic experience
>Ends up as a garbage man
Not knocking down garbage men, but Sid was a creative dude, he could've been working as a propmaker in a movie studio
Minors can't light or posses big fireworks
only if you're a LAME-O
He looks like he eats sand
Only stealing his sister’s toys and fricking them up. I don’t think Hannah actually decapitated her own dolls either which is kind of sad that every toy she gets her brother mangled up.
That said Sid is pretty extreme in how quickly he destroys his toys, though seeing his home life you can understand it. The dad’s a drunk that the dog’s afraid to approach and the mom screams across the house to get her kids’ attention.
He played with explosives underaged