I didn't even say the painting I posted was in the same style, but it's an example of actually good portrait art. There used to be standards when evaluating painting, and good painters were commissioned for important figures. But there's no good painters now, so people who taught themselves to paint in their 20s and make porn cutouts that look like famous people's faces now get the commission.
'Jonathan Yeo' is a total amateur. He has all the classic trademarks of a contemporary, amateur painter. I would prefer Soviet Realism any day.
I have better things to do than educate plebs about the fine art of painting. If you knew anything about art, you would know explaining the basics all the way up the features necessary for a proper understanding of my criticism would require extensive time, and in essence a full artistic education over many weeks, months or even years.
Goodbye, hopefully you may one day educate yourself.
sometimes I think this place is full of normies and I read posts from Anon's like this. Thank you for keeping Cinemaphile alive with your autism.
I didn't even say the painting I posted was in the same style, but it's an example of actually good portrait art. There used to be standards when evaluating painting, and good painters were commissioned for important figures. But there's no good painters now, so people who taught themselves to paint in their 20s and make porn cutouts that look like famous people's faces now get the commission.
'Jonathan Yeo' is a total amateur. He has all the classic trademarks of a contemporary, amateur painter. I would prefer Soviet Realism any day.
>There used to be standards when evaluating painting
Evaluate it then. All you're saying is that it's bad because it's not to your taste.
I have better things to do than educate plebs about the fine art of painting. If you knew anything about art, you would know explaining the basics all the way up the features necessary for a proper understanding of my criticism would require extensive time, and in essence a full artistic education over many weeks, months or even years.
Goodbye, hopefully you may one day educate yourself.
Subversive as frick to show the head of the state of the British Empire drowning in the blood of its victims and those still suffering the consequences of its actions to this day.
If the monarchy is phased out in the next few decades, that portrait will appear prominently in school-age history books.
The same people seething over this were creaming themselves over Obamas presidential portrait, that also defied a lot of the conventions for state portraits
>what the hell is this butterfly shit
probably put in so hundreds of morons spend their days talking about
Wait frick i'm moronic I put butterfly because I forgot what the background of the obama one was between looking at it and making that post, I didn't mean the butterfly in OP
He's spent most of his public career championing environmental causes, and not the homosexual CO2 decrease kind, but field and hedgerow and population control kind. He has mentioned Evola and Guenon in public and clearly is some kind of secret Traditionalist. Interesting guy. The fact that his body is faded with the background/as a part of the background is due to this. morons think its some occult nonesene which it's not
Have you read Guenon or Evola? They aren't regular conservatives; also he reigns but doesn't rule. He has no actual power beyond symbolic power, which means essentially nothing. There's a pic of him with a Rothschild that I can't be bothered to look up, and you can tell whose in charge. He said one time if he could turn into a virus that would kill 99% of humanity he would chose to morph into it on the spot lol
>Have you read Guenon or Evola
Yes Rahner, spengler, Coomaraswamy, and other traditionalists >He has no actual power beyond symbolic power, which means essentially nothing
no point of having him at all, he wont even speak up about what is happening >time if he could turn into a virus that would kill 99% of humanity he would chose to morph into it
kinda based
Why were you surprised at infinity immigrants then? Don't ask stupid questions if you're not stupid >Coomaraswamy
Never heard of this guy will look up ty
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Why were you surprised at infinity immigrants then? Don't ask stupid questions if you're not stupid
because he is the king dummy...
1 month ago
Anonymous
Please read up on how the government of Britain works. People read Spengler before the basics smdh
Based portrait. Imagine all the jeets that collectively shit themselves upon seeing it.
if Charles ordered the expulsion of all pajeets from the Commonwealth he would go down as possibly the greatest monarch of all time
I would take the knee for my new King
Ah yes, the already fading King, covered in the blood spilt in his name.
Bravo.
Very kino portrait, art of painting is not dead.
It's extremely amateurish and would be laughed at by even the lowest portrait painter of the early 20th century. You don't know SHIT.
It's almost like art and the appreciation of art is subjective.
Lol, only plebs say that because they lack the ability to discern quality or even technique. Go back to talking about capeshit.
They're two completely different styles anon. Shows how much you know about art.
I didn't even say the painting I posted was in the same style, but it's an example of actually good portrait art. There used to be standards when evaluating painting, and good painters were commissioned for important figures. But there's no good painters now, so people who taught themselves to paint in their 20s and make porn cutouts that look like famous people's faces now get the commission.
'Jonathan Yeo' is a total amateur. He has all the classic trademarks of a contemporary, amateur painter. I would prefer Soviet Realism any day.
sometimes I think this place is full of normies and I read posts from Anon's like this. Thank you for keeping Cinemaphile alive with your autism.
>It's extremely amateurish
>There used to be standards when evaluating painting
Evaluate it then. All you're saying is that it's bad because it's not to your taste.
I have better things to do than educate plebs about the fine art of painting. If you knew anything about art, you would know explaining the basics all the way up the features necessary for a proper understanding of my criticism would require extensive time, and in essence a full artistic education over many weeks, months or even years.
Goodbye, hopefully you may one day educate yourself.
The title of the painting is "The Cleansing of Delhi"
Painted in 2029
A portrait sure to drive people mad
>is that a painting...of a demon??? I'm going insaaaaaane
Elden Ring lookin ass
sheogorath mania
that painting is so awesome
Looks amazing tbqh
Subversive as frick to show the head of the state of the British Empire drowning in the blood of its victims and those still suffering the consequences of its actions to this day.
If the monarchy is phased out in the next few decades, that portrait will appear prominently in school-age history books.
>AAA is that red next to a figure of power, it must symbolise blood AAAA
Fricking moron
You fricking troglodyte, he's literally wearing military regalia.
Is that the King (who has never waged a war in his reign), wearing formal regalia! He must be a warlord!
>drowning
My guy is thriving in it, stay mad
>thriving
Not being able to read facial expressions is a symptom of autism, anon.
I like that they got his sausage fingers right.
looks kino
Back in my day bait would be more subtle
Despite looking like hell, this picture gives me the same energy as this meme one. Especially with the random butterfly on his shoulder.
This looks great, only low iq peasants with serf tier superstition hate this
The same people seething over this were creaming themselves over Obamas presidential portrait, that also defied a lot of the conventions for state portraits
both are good
What the frick, the what's his name one in OP is maybe a bit weird but at least they were going for something what the hell is this butterfly shit
>what the hell is this butterfly shit
probably put in so hundreds of morons spend their days talking about
Wait frick i'm moronic I put butterfly because I forgot what the background of the obama one was between looking at it and making that post, I didn't mean the butterfly in OP
what's the story behind this painting?
nothing, the king who is some sort of hippy probably said make it look cool and different
what's with the butterfly?
He's spent most of his public career championing environmental causes, and not the homosexual CO2 decrease kind, but field and hedgerow and population control kind. He has mentioned Evola and Guenon in public and clearly is some kind of secret Traditionalist. Interesting guy. The fact that his body is faded with the background/as a part of the background is due to this. morons think its some occult nonesene which it's not
so why is he letting hordes of people that will destroy everything into UK lmao, not really a traditionalist. i still like the photo
Have you read Guenon or Evola? They aren't regular conservatives; also he reigns but doesn't rule. He has no actual power beyond symbolic power, which means essentially nothing. There's a pic of him with a Rothschild that I can't be bothered to look up, and you can tell whose in charge. He said one time if he could turn into a virus that would kill 99% of humanity he would chose to morph into it on the spot lol
>Have you read Guenon or Evola
Yes Rahner, spengler, Coomaraswamy, and other traditionalists
>He has no actual power beyond symbolic power, which means essentially nothing
no point of having him at all, he wont even speak up about what is happening
>time if he could turn into a virus that would kill 99% of humanity he would chose to morph into it
kinda based
Why were you surprised at infinity immigrants then? Don't ask stupid questions if you're not stupid
>Coomaraswamy
Never heard of this guy will look up ty
>Why were you surprised at infinity immigrants then? Don't ask stupid questions if you're not stupid
because he is the king dummy...
Please read up on how the government of Britain works. People read Spengler before the basics smdh