deal with it. That's how this group of dinosaurs mostly looked like for a fact
animals aren't supposed to look cool,they are supposed to survived through natural selection and suffer the changes accordingly over time
Don't worry, they're full of shit. They don't care about actual evidence, it's just a culture war thing. >https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/
you scales only gays are the butthurt ones. Many dinosaurs taxa DID have feathers, wether you like it or not. You people are the ones calling it a culture war.
Chickens are based. They shit, piss and lay eggs all out of the same hole. They just suction cup together and the dude drops his load directly into the female when they get it on
Have those homosexual ass scientists explained how modern birds are literally defined as being toothless but dinosaurs are known for their teeth? Or the fact that plenty of dinosaurs never evolved to fly?
Dinosaurs were neither all scaled nor all feathered. Dinosaurs were around for 120,000,000 years. I don't think you understand how long that is. The Earth went through changes in that time, from oxygen levels, to temperature. This caused evolutionary changes. The T-Rex, for example, was scaled because we have fossilised remains of its scales. Did it have feathers on its head? We don't know. A relation to T-Rex did, so it is possible. Again, not all dinosaurs were feathered or had feathers or quills or fuzz or anything and not all of them were scaly lizards.
Stop this either or. They were varied and had different things. Just like reptiles are today. From fingernail sized chameleons to the all female species of whiptail lizard (possibly two) that reproduce by rubbing their cloacae on each other to induce parthenogenesis. Nature isn't cut and dry.
>have they found any evidence for dino feathers
Yes? But obviously not ALL dinosaurs had them.
Don't worry, they're full of shit. They don't care about actual evidence, it's just a culture war thing. >https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/
Again, this isn't a 'culture war' thing you fricking moron. Some dinosaurs did, some didn't. Why are you dealing in absolutes? Why are you pretending a species of creature that ruled the planet for over a hundred million years remained completely unchanged in that period? We have thousands upon thousands of known dinosaurs and that's based on fossils we have imagine how many we don't have. Stop being moronic. The T-Rex might be scaled but that doesn't mean a fricking Hypsilophodon did or didn't (to pick a random dinosaur that may or may not have had feathers).
Shut up you massive strawmanning homosexual, I didn't make a single one of those claims you stupid piece of shit. Nobody said that no dinosaurs had feathers. But there are those who claim that the likes of T-Rex looked like this, and those people are driven entirely by a contrarian hatred of cool stuff.
I like chickens
Chickens are disgusting and annoying as frick and anyone who likes them has never been around them for long.
How are they annoying? They're easy as frick to deal with.
They sense dickheads like you. Chickens have always been chill around me.
yeah man you sure have dealt with livestock before
never met a goose have you? or a moronic goat that wants to headbutt you all the time
goats headbutt others as a way to show they love them
they like to climb on you if they like you, too
yesss, good goy
they're based af and dont require too much care or attention unlike cats
this *eats shit*
easy on the toxoplasma, gay
Chickens are disgusting and annoying. Roosters are based as frick.
Shitskin
self preparing sandwich
why are they so shit at eating?
>i can beak this crust
>you cant beak that crust
>baaaaaaark
99% of people won't get this, anon.
it's the cuff dwarf
am I the 1%
>even the chickens don’t want the crust
Wait til mom hears about this.
Yes.
warm blooded plebs should bow to t-rex
>Dinosaurs and birds? No way bro, they're nothing ali-
Those things look goofy but they’ve actually killed people.
Hippos look goofy as frick and they're supposedly the number 1 killer of people in Africa...well besides Africans
fuark that looks comfy
frick you feathergays for ruining my childhood
>Nah, frick YOU feather man
I really don't understand this autism.
Dinosaurs were cool as frick when they were just giant lizards. They look homosexual with fathers. How is that hard to understand?
deal with it. That's how this group of dinosaurs mostly looked like for a fact
animals aren't supposed to look cool,they are supposed to survived through natural selection and suffer the changes accordingly over time
Don't worry, they're full of shit. They don't care about actual evidence, it's just a culture war thing.
>https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/t-rex-skin-was-not-covered-feathers-study-says-180963603/
you scales only gays are the butthurt ones. Many dinosaurs taxa DID have feathers, wether you like it or not. You people are the ones calling it a culture war.
not true, I was there
>pretentious europistani homosexual hates chickens for moronic reasons
ok?
>listening to krauts post 1945
ngmi
Chickens are based. They shit, piss and lay eggs all out of the same hole. They just suction cup together and the dude drops his load directly into the female when they get it on
>docking procedure initiated
that's a biblically accurate velociraptor
>white_girl_visits_india.webm
>TIME FOR SOME GOOD DUCKING BROS
Kvacky Lane-The Blue Room
Have those homosexual ass scientists explained how modern birds are literally defined as being toothless but dinosaurs are known for their teeth? Or the fact that plenty of dinosaurs never evolved to fly?
Geese have teeth
plenty of dinosaurs had beaks
?si=q3RaqCyRT1W7iRHd
So weird how dinosaurs have sort become a part of the culture war.
birds are warm blooded feathered reptiles
Dinosaurs were neither all scaled nor all feathered. Dinosaurs were around for 120,000,000 years. I don't think you understand how long that is. The Earth went through changes in that time, from oxygen levels, to temperature. This caused evolutionary changes. The T-Rex, for example, was scaled because we have fossilised remains of its scales. Did it have feathers on its head? We don't know. A relation to T-Rex did, so it is possible. Again, not all dinosaurs were feathered or had feathers or quills or fuzz or anything and not all of them were scaly lizards.
Stop this either or. They were varied and had different things. Just like reptiles are today. From fingernail sized chameleons to the all female species of whiptail lizard (possibly two) that reproduce by rubbing their cloacae on each other to induce parthenogenesis. Nature isn't cut and dry.
aren't feathers fossilized in ambers all the time? have they found any evidence for dino feathers?
>have they found any evidence for dino feathers
Yes? But obviously not ALL dinosaurs had them.
Again, this isn't a 'culture war' thing you fricking moron. Some dinosaurs did, some didn't. Why are you dealing in absolutes? Why are you pretending a species of creature that ruled the planet for over a hundred million years remained completely unchanged in that period? We have thousands upon thousands of known dinosaurs and that's based on fossils we have imagine how many we don't have. Stop being moronic. The T-Rex might be scaled but that doesn't mean a fricking Hypsilophodon did or didn't (to pick a random dinosaur that may or may not have had feathers).
Shut up you massive strawmanning homosexual, I didn't make a single one of those claims you stupid piece of shit. Nobody said that no dinosaurs had feathers. But there are those who claim that the likes of T-Rex looked like this, and those people are driven entirely by a contrarian hatred of cool stuff.
I wish they'd fricking hatch these.
Here are kids of Adam and Eve
ARISE CHICKUN