Are you blind? Its there for like 2 seconds.
When I was 8 yo that shit broke my mind because I wasnt able to wrap my head around why it suddenly looked so terrible.
Seriously I cannot understand how THIS SHOT made it into the final movie. Even back then it looked like absolute shit, how the frick could something like that happen?
Dexter Jettster is fricking based he is literally the only character in the films whos traveled to other galaxies he's an inter-galactic restaurant owner who only employs waifu-droids to save money, without Dexter Jester I am not sure if Attack of The Clones would still be my favorite Star Wars movie or not still.
How come Dexter Jettster succeeded but Jar Jar Binks failed? Jar Jar Binks was more based than people give him credit for but still not as based as Dexter Jettster but still I mean Jar Jar did not deserve 79% of the hate he got imho. I'm not gonna say Jar Jar Binks did nothing wrong but he was still Kino
Jar Jar is hated even in universe he was one of the senators to give Palpatine emergency powers, he literally caused the war and the rise of the empire
He winds up an exiled impoverished street clown
Phantom Menace Budget $115 Million
Attack of the Clone Budget $115 Million
Revenge of the Sith Budget $113 Million
Lucas got a trilogy of sci-fi movies, each with their own designs and style for the total of $343 Million
You might want everyone to be like James Cameron and spend unlimited amounts of money to get the shot right, but remember Star Wars was an independent film series, Lucas always said he had a writers cap he wore, a directors cap and a producers cap he wore also. He just couldn't spend endless amounts of cash he had to be reasonable.
Sam Raimi spent $250 million just for Spiderman 3, he ran up the budget because he was mad at Sony for rushing him to make a sequel after part 2.
>Phantom Menace Budget $115 Million >Attack of the Clone Budget $115 Million >Revenge of the Sith Budget $113 Million
Yeah. 20 years ago. Adjusted for inflation its more than enough but he pushed a technology that wasn't quite there and it looked like shit.
He'd spend a lot less if he didn't use CGI and didn't hire big names like Sam Jackson.
Even the OT adjusted for inflation had less than half of the budget compared to the prequels
Why didn't Lucas ever touch up the CGI of the prequels? I know he did some stuff for TPM but that was it, he just stuck to making alterations to the OT.
Because he didn't spend all that time with the prequels before he sold them to Disney.
The OT he got accustomed watching over the 30 year period, so he changed those.
If he had not sold, he probably would've have made alterations after a 20 year time period or so.
When a lot of anons on Cinemaphile started unironically defending this, I realized that this board truly has no taste in anything and that the opinions of the "people" on here are not to be taken seriously.
People were shitting on Lucas for the Phantom Menace because it was family story that had children and goofy aliens. And all the manchildren wanted their sci-fi to be super serious like the Matrix or as Lucas himself said they wanted Terminator in outer space.
And its repeating today with Avatar 2, Youtube critics crying over a family story with kids and goofy aliens.
People that went to see it at a cinema with digital ready projector were in awe because the master those cinemas got had no film grain and they felt like it was very clear and interesting.
I think the morons added digital grain later on for the dvd and clearly for the BluRay
I just realized he has a moustache
Because every frame is so dense
Dense with bad cgi yeah
You can thank George Lucas for really pushing green screen and CGI technology in modern filmmaking
dvd's were 480p resolution
ain't nobody could see the shitty details
>le dvds
Lucas was all about "the theater experience" and details and that's why he shot two of the films on digital
I was in the theater there wasn’t much detail.
shit cgi that was somethign new and different in 2000 > quailtiy cgi that is generic and boring in 2022
Jurassic Park and Starship Troopers had better CG and implemented it better
I wouldnt say it was better they just didnt try and make an entire move with it
How do you eat your French toast after this is the guy who made it
>when George Lucas ran out of budget
This cannot be in the movie
Are you blind? Its there for like 2 seconds.
When I was 8 yo that shit broke my mind because I wasnt able to wrap my head around why it suddenly looked so terrible.
Seriously I cannot understand how THIS SHOT made it into the final movie. Even back then it looked like absolute shit, how the frick could something like that happen?
They got mixed up with the PS1 game cutscene and the movie cutscene, oops
what the frick, might as well go back to miniatures for such a simple shot.
Looks like some bowling screen shit
Kino
lel
Dexter Jettster is fricking based he is literally the only character in the films whos traveled to other galaxies he's an inter-galactic restaurant owner who only employs waifu-droids to save money, without Dexter Jester I am not sure if Attack of The Clones would still be my favorite Star Wars movie or not still.
How come Dexter Jettster succeeded but Jar Jar Binks failed? Jar Jar Binks was more based than people give him credit for but still not as based as Dexter Jettster but still I mean Jar Jar did not deserve 79% of the hate he got imho. I'm not gonna say Jar Jar Binks did nothing wrong but he was still Kino
Jar Jar is hated even in universe he was one of the senators to give Palpatine emergency powers, he literally caused the war and the rise of the empire
He winds up an exiled impoverished street clown
Phantom Menace Budget $115 Million
Attack of the Clone Budget $115 Million
Revenge of the Sith Budget $113 Million
Lucas got a trilogy of sci-fi movies, each with their own designs and style for the total of $343 Million
You might want everyone to be like James Cameron and spend unlimited amounts of money to get the shot right, but remember Star Wars was an independent film series, Lucas always said he had a writers cap he wore, a directors cap and a producers cap he wore also. He just couldn't spend endless amounts of cash he had to be reasonable.
Sam Raimi spent $250 million just for Spiderman 3, he ran up the budget because he was mad at Sony for rushing him to make a sequel after part 2.
>Phantom Menace Budget $115 Million
>Attack of the Clone Budget $115 Million
>Revenge of the Sith Budget $113 Million
Yeah. 20 years ago. Adjusted for inflation its more than enough but he pushed a technology that wasn't quite there and it looked like shit.
Imagine what could have been on todays budgets, imagine the fungal scenes, ohhhhh my
He'd spend a lot less if he didn't use CGI and didn't hire big names like Sam Jackson.
Even the OT adjusted for inflation had less than half of the budget compared to the prequels
These are movies for 6 year olds.
Many of the CGI techniques we use today weren't even invented or production-ready yet.
Why didn't Lucas ever touch up the CGI of the prequels? I know he did some stuff for TPM but that was it, he just stuck to making alterations to the OT.
Because he didn't spend all that time with the prequels before he sold them to Disney.
The OT he got accustomed watching over the 30 year period, so he changed those.
If he had not sold, he probably would've have made alterations after a 20 year time period or so.
When a lot of anons on Cinemaphile started unironically defending this, I realized that this board truly has no taste in anything and that the opinions of the "people" on here are not to be taken seriously.
People were shitting on Lucas for the Phantom Menace because it was family story that had children and goofy aliens. And all the manchildren wanted their sci-fi to be super serious like the Matrix or as Lucas himself said they wanted Terminator in outer space.
And its repeating today with Avatar 2, Youtube critics crying over a family story with kids and goofy aliens.
>Serious trans allegory like the Matrix
lol, now wonder the SW obsessed fanbase devolved into the homosexuality focused Dinsey troons
God I love shitting on the prequels.
Very bad example, that shading is pretty damn good for the day.
What about it, this is the exact frame from 2019 remaster.
>le martian ron jeremy
People that went to see it at a cinema with digital ready projector were in awe because the master those cinemas got had no film grain and they felt like it was very clear and interesting.
I think the morons added digital grain later on for the dvd and clearly for the BluRay