Hi Mike, you should do a new Prequel review where you respond to and btfo all the reddit prequel apologists so they know the movies are still bad.

Hi Mike, you should do a new Prequel review where you respond to and btfo all the reddit prequel apologists so they know the movies are still bad. Thanks

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    THIS the prequels didn’t even have any interracial sex scenes! Don’t even get me started on the NOT GAYS

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    he should really do some sort of Star Wars retrospective

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He couldn't even make a coherent prequel criticism in like 4 straight hours of video even when the entire internet hated them, how the frick is he gonna manage now when people might actually push back?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >it wasn't coherent because... because I said so!!!
      lol okay prequelbabbie

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >>it wasn't coherent because... because I said so!!!
        lol are you implying that isn't exactly what Mike did in his reviews?
        >the Prequels are bad because they just are ok???

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          all of the reviews give clear statements and reasonings as to why he believes the prequels are awful you fricking zoomer

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            you mean like when he said the characters are bad because here's a compilation of his friends saying the characters are bad?
            the absolute state of manchild film analysis

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              his argument was that the characters in the prequels aren't memorable and that their motivations aren't made clear. it's a pretty basic thing in storytelling

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >his argument was that the characters in the prequels aren't memorable and that their motivations aren't made clear. it's a pretty basic thing in storytelling
                That’s not true tho
                Just because the mongoloid viewer (mike & you) are moronic and can’t use higher cognitive functions doesn’t mean the movie bad, writing terrible etc etc ad nauseum bullshit.
                It’s such a nothing argument. Truly reddit tier reasoning
                “WELL *I* DIDNT LIKE THIS CHARACTER”
                ok and?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                if a person can't distinguish the personalities of several characters then you've failed as a writer.
                tell me, who's the protagonist of the prequels?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >quigon jin in episode 1
                >aniken in episode 2 and 3

                So difficult.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >tell me, who's the protagonist of the prequels?
                Obi-Wan.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                oh no rlmbros! how are we going to respond?!

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Lord of the Rings has bad characters because I just said it does
                Prove me wrong

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >his argument
                that isn't an argument though, do they not teach basic literary analysis in America or something?
                you can't just make an assertion without backing it up, and asking your friends to just repeat your assertion is NOT evidence in its favor

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                it is an argument because he does back himself up. almost sounds like your seething more about the fact that no one remembers the character traits of qui gon or amidala

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >t the fact that no one remembers the character traits of qui gon or amidala
                I guess that answers my question lol, you actually DO think assertions and arguments are the same thing

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                bro... you're too blinded by your seething hatred of Mike to even pay attention to what he's saying in the prequel reviews

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                homie I know nothing about Mike BESIDES his prequel reviews, that's literally the only RLM content I've ever seen
                and it's a pretty piss poor first impression, he talks like someone who knows literally nothing at all about the absolute basics of film analysis

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                look i'm not gonna pretend he's saying anything particularly profound about them but the arguments he puts forward are still solid, even if they're so obvious they practically write themselves.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                what arguments? I'm seriously not sure I remember a time where he uses anything from that actual movie to back up his points

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Mike is a beggar

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          Hours of thought out and well constructed arguments are the opposite of "they just are ok"

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            all of the reviews give clear statements and reasonings as to why he believes the prequels are awful you fricking zoomer

            There’s no real arguments in his “critique”.
            Name one real cogent point

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              the burden of proof falls on you actually, there are very obvious solid arguments in the reviews

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Name them.

                if a person can't distinguish the personalities of several characters then you've failed as a writer.
                tell me, who's the protagonist of the prequels?

                This hinges on me somehow respecting a man being sub 70 iq and proud of it.
                What the frick are you talking about ? Which characters are interchangeable?
                The only “argument” RLM puts forth is based on their stupidity and lack of understanding.

                Imagine building a “magnum opus” of critique on being unable to grasp the material being critiqued. It’s hilarious and sad in equal measures, and you are sad for lionizing it.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >Which characters are interchangeable?
                qui gon and obi wan are perfect examples.
                did also you miss the many parts of the reviews where he goes over some of the bad writing? tpm has a good example at the beginning with
                >destroy what is left of them
                why would they tell the droids to enter when the gas has only been on for less than a minute? why didn't they poison their drinks instead?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Not a plot hole. Jedi have breathing apparatus and are supermen.
                The feds are improvising, panicking.
                Jedi can cut themselves out of anything with lightsabers. They weren’t trapped in there.

                It’s a garbage “plot hole” type argument popular with redditors, where they don’t even try to understand the movie but go at it filled with cognitive bias that limits their reasoning.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                but again, they were served drinks right before that moment that they drank despite knowing that they could be in danger.
                you also have moments like in AotC where they decided to have Padmé sleep in her room which has a window. she's in obvious danger and they decide to have her sleep next to a window. you also have the bounty hunter who could've easily sniped her through it, or use something quicker than the bug.
                it also makes no sense for obi wan to jump out of the window after that moment, considering he's the one pestering anakin for being the impatient one.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >where they decided to have Padmé sleep in her room which has a window. she's in obvious danger and they decide to have her sleep next to a window

                >I know, but we also want to catch this assassin. Don't we, Master?
                >You're using her as bait??
                >It was her idea...
                Again, the plot holes vanish the second you actually WATCH the fricking movie

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Why would you use her as bait when you have body doubles? When they could just explode the room. You're coping. Stop that

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >they were served drinks right before that moment that they drank despite knowing that they could be in danger.
                They didn’t sense anything from the drinks. NEXT fricking stupid complaint?
                These things literally change nothing, only thing they allow is for redditors to feel smart for once in their life

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >They didn’t sense anything from the drinks
                Bravo George

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >RUNE : Have you ever encountered a Jedi Knight before, sir?
                >NUTE : Well, not exactly, but I don't...(panicked)
                The whole intro was about portraying the Jedi as unstoppable killing machines that the TF didn't know how to deal with, they blatantly under-estimate them. A character making a bad decision isn't a fricking 'plot hole' and I want this moron-tier style of nerd critique to frick off already

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                They shit bricks as soon as they are discovered to be Jedi. And why wouldn’t they? They are trying to exploit a legal grey area and a pair of mind controlling psionic warriors just crashed into you

                They basically invaded a whole country because of that. Kill the cops, fail … frick ok then we go for broke

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                there's a difference between a character making a bad decision and not being logical

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                ???
                what did he mean by this

                Bros, if you're still falling for the cheap rhetorical tricks like Mike getting his homosexual friends to pretend to be stupid and not know anything about characters for a video, I don't know what to tell you. Honestly, if you're still at the point where you think Star Wars was "saved in the edit" you don't even deserve to be able to participate in George Lucas discussions.

                Based

                films are a collaborative effort. not to mention that the scenes that george wanted to be left in originally totally ruined the pacing of the film

                Cringe. Turn in your posting license puto

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >jedi as unstoppable killing machines
                >only take the bare minimum of measures to defeat them

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >>only take the bare minimum of measures to defeat them
                ?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                why not go all out in trying to kill a couple of jedi masters?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Go watch the reviews now that you're 10 years wiser and realize how flimsy 90% of his points are.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Criticism isn't incoherent just because it's aimet at bad things you like because you've seen them when you were 6, prequelbaby

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Their entire schtick is such moronic nonsense
    >constantly criticize the fanboyism of the current star wars fanbase
    >as if the sole reason they are relevant isn't their pure ot fanboyism prequel reviews
    >as if they aren't the prototypical ot/tng fanboys
    You can just tell that their entire basis for their opinion on shit related to star wars/trek is how it anchors to their autistic obsession with it, which makes them no better than the nerd crew or star wars may the 4th morons they love to mock

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine caring about what some pseud e-celeb has to say.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    mike died during the screening of the first sequel and doesn't care about trek wars anymore

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >doesn’t care
      >still reviews everything in each franchise

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        he reviews it begrudgingly, not out of any love

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine begging for daddy to save you because you are too moronic to debate your shitty opinion
    Kys yourself

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    This newer wave of Plinkett inspired youtubers like Mauler and Drinker who capitalized on the TLJ gravyr train won't dare to touch the prequels even though they know they're bad. Because a large part of their fanbase are prequel fans and they're afraid they'll turn on them

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      or because their style of pointing out simple plot holes literally doesn't work on the prequels because the plot actually makes sense

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Hi Mike you should really just go do your own thing so I can actually be entertained watching Rich and Jay talk about something they still care about, like movies.

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He became the living embodiment of the Dunning–Kruger effect

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Remember when Mr Plinkett showed footage of JJ Abrams physically shaking the camera with his hand, and said that star wars should have that?

    ?t=3528

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Jay and Mike aren't the same people, and the problem is that it goes from smooth camera to shaky camera without a cut, so it looks like the guy holding the camera started violently shaking

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        or like Abrams started hitting the side of the camera

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He already did that. I can't remember if it's the TFA plinkett or the Rogue One pinkett but it's like 70% just restating that the prequels suck

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Bros, if you're still falling for the cheap rhetorical tricks like Mike getting his homosexual friends to pretend to be stupid and not know anything about characters for a video, I don't know what to tell you. Honestly, if you're still at the point where you think Star Wars was "saved in the edit" you don't even deserve to be able to participate in George Lucas discussions.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      films are a collaborative effort. not to mention that the scenes that george wanted to be left in originally totally ruined the pacing of the film

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >films are a collaborative effort.
        Yes, that's why George was there at every point of film-making, the Marcia Lucas narrative is bogus.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          it's not untrue that the early cuts of star wars were poorly paced with pointless scenes riddled throughout. marcia was one of the editors that helped to improve the pacing and re-edited the third act, but she wasn't solely responsible

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Tell me the character traits of Queen Amidala

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Adventurous, rebellious, risk-taking leader that everyone underestimates but is actually silk hiding steel and doesn't bow to political pressure with an iron will. Stubborn, down-to-earth, idealist.
        Now describe JarJar

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          >Adventurous, rebellious, risk-taking
          These are things she does not what she is kek.
          Frick I bet you thought you were smart.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Idiot homosexual how about you just watch the fricking movie

        Reminder that no other movie receives this much spiteful nitpicking

        Could you imagine some mongrel derailing an American Psycho discussion, demanding people DELIVER the motivations of some guy like Bryce or Van Patten,
        Or a main character like the beach guard from Jaws.
        Like what the frick are you saying?
        Are you so moronic you can’t understand a character like Padme Amidala , even though her motivations are painfully clear, enunciated over and over, given plenty of focus, and a whole third of the movie is about her and her struggle to free her planet from invaders?

        RLMtards/OTBlack folk are utter abhuman rejects who should be aborted out of the gene pool.

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          do you like clone wars?

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          If it's so obvious why is it so hard for you to say clearly

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            I am rejecting your utter inanity and I wish you would get cancer and die rather than to stoop to your low level mongrel babble

            Frickin kys nig nog redditor trash
            die already

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              The average prequelbabbie, everyone

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Regardless of any points you may have, you sound unhinged

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              Once again, what are Queen Amidala's character traits?
              This shouldn't be difficult

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                she is goal oriented strong woman with a sense of duty and respect for the institution that failed her. she also has a soft emotional side of compassion

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Imagine believing you need to prove anything to reddit trannies that consume RLM
                a more dysgenic, dead end group is hard to find lmao
                They are probably all sterile funko pop collectors. Definitely someone that doesn’t deserve respect or even dignity.

                Regardless of any points you may have, you sound unhinged

                You know I’m right.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I know you sound unhinged

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Irrelevant. Why do you care how presentable you are? Who are you looking to impress?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i mean when you're legitimately frothing at the mouth in text form like a deranged psychopath it does somewhat detract from the essence of what you're saying

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                I am justifiably angry about the level of “discussion” here. And it has everything to do with the culture of parasocial mediocrity coming straight outta reddit

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >irrelevant
                It should be relevant for you
                >Why do you care how presentable you are?
                I personally care because how presentable you are will influence how well others perceive your points
                >Who are you looking to impress?
                Being mentally well is not done to impress

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      RLM’s dicklickers are under the impression that Mike and Jay are their friends for some reason, rhetoric isn’t even needed

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    mike likes obiwan show lol

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      He’s mentally ill.
      It’s obvious they subsist on leftoid spite, like trannies.
      If something hurts starwars, and by extension destroys Lucas’ legacy, it is good. Because Lucas betrayed his ~trust~

      Only Americans are this mentally ill btw

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yeah that must be it, prequels are bad, but not this fricking bad. mike and rich can see problems in picard, but kenobi is just as moronic.
        i guess i shouldnt be suprised. dude loves TFA

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          I don't think he loves TFA. That's too strong a word based on the review they did

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            >i loved it
            was he being ironic?
            >tfa masterfully rebooted the series
            ?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              He said he loved it?
              >tfa masterfully rebooted the series
              I can agree to an extent. It's the sequels to it that fricked everything set up by TFA

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                ?t=167

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Huh, he did

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                their hatred for prequels makes him very wierd. its like jay saying that last jedi was not terrible and its interesting
                i dont like prequels either but holly shit

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >its like jay saying that last jedi was not terrible and its interesting
                I thought he said that the ideas were interesting, but that he didn't like how they were done

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                you are right, it was rich

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              He was saying that TFA returned Star Wars to exactly what everyone thought it was. That's not speaking about the quality of the movie. Just that it's rebels vs the empire again.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                >masterfull
                >not praising
                but its not even true

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                He said "masterful" in the way that it did pretty much bring Star Wars exactly back to what people thought it was. That's not referencing how the movie actually handled those concepts. Just that they reintroduced everything again.

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                He’s a grotesque con man

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i guess its up for discussion. i dont believe that statment can be made without approval of the product, but you are right i might be reading too much into it. It also isnt true because the rise of new empire made no sense at all and it got buried by TLJ

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        You sound pretty adjusted and mentally well, anon

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      No, he says his standards are so low after watching Picard that he just finds the show fine. At least, that's what him and Rich say in at the start of the review, and I haven't watched further than that

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >I haven't watched further than that
        in the rest of the video him and rich seethe over prequels and praise kenobi and says he liked it

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    how much gayer will RLM opinions have to get before paypigs stop paying?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Are you often in RLM threads?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        sometimes, when they have a really stupid take

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          So you watch them?

          • 2 years ago
            Anonymous

            i do, why else would i be here?

            • 2 years ago
              Anonymous

              So it's fair to say that you enjoy them and their content?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                i used to love it, last few years it has gone downhill besides their star trek commentary

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Alright, so you don't watch much of their stuff beyond the Star Trek or Star Wars content ?

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                only what sparks my interest or is relevant to current movie discourse - like kenobi review

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                Just had to make sure you weren't one of those people who watch something they despise. Carry on

              • 2 years ago
                Anonymous

                nah, i used to love BotW but ever since the home alone kid it the "spark" and i stopped, unless its a spotlight, tbh maybe normal hitb dont interest me because most movies that come out dont look appealing

  16. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Hey Mike the opinions you wrote for me are a little outdated now and I keep losing arguments online about this franchise for little children. Please write newer opinions for me to have.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *