Eddie I did the pre-Crusade consecration thing like 3 times in his life, and every time got wienerblocked by domestic unrest (although I think 1 of the times it was from Llywelyn ap Gruffydd's attacks in the Marches instead of the Jocks)
Edward II wasn’t as bad as people make out he was an incompetent king who had favourites which caused big turmoil in the court and he lost a lot of English territory in France but he wasn’t an effeminate weakling either.
Anglos and Germanics were always evil and in combination they are completely unstoppable. Even today, look at the Rothschild family. The entire financial system that we know as western capitalism is controlled by anglos behind the scenes(committee of 300). They in turn control the bilderberg and other israeli cronies.
He was also the first King of England to habitually speak English at court. After all he was named by his father Henry III after Edward the confessor, and Henry was a big angloboo. At the time it was unusual to name an heir to the throne such an archaic Anglo Saxon name.
Because they got cucked so hard by their old colony, sure. Congratulations Nigel, be sure to thank all the Americans for helping you in TWO world wars lol
>have "history's largest empire" >it's literally just pooistan, a desert prison island colony, scattered poor african states, and one worthwhile colony that quickly fights its way to independence and then eclipses you in every imaginable way
Bravo
It is, but it also is much worse than a random nationality from the desert. Stay unconscious. The shit posted on pol is barely scratching the surface. Go read The History of Central Banks and research the wealthiest family legacies throughout history.
>Longshanks
was not Anglo. He was a Norman descendant. Normans themselves were a mixture of Scandinavians and French-Britons.
It doesn't really matter. That entire peninsular area all the way to west Germany was a humanity powerhouse throughout most of history and it produced exceptional individuals, much of whom still have their legacies in everything.
Let me rephrase:
The Scandinavians were Northern Europeans, while the French-Britons were the returning British people who belonged to the British Isles originally but were forced to move to France at an earlier point in time.
And they formed England's greatest dynasty: the Plantagenets.
Saying you're bored of something or putting "muh" in front of it or whatever doesn't magically make it not true. (That said, Braveheart's many inaccuracies are hilariously entertaining, even to a bong like me.)
>First historical appearance is a genocide of a celt population after betrayal >Lose wars to danes, genocide their settlements after they sail from isle >Start colonisation of a new world with a genocide >Genocide Irish after not tasting blood long enough >Genocide abbos >Genocide maori >Genocide themselves by importing poos >As a parting gift to the world start genocide of a palestinians by creating Israel
Nah they good boyz dindu nuffin
>>The English are evil!
I mean, they were for the vast majority of their existence. Until the end of WW2 when they were emasculated by America and rendered useless
>emasculated
In image only. Economically the anglos are still behind every single major move, Russia for example is a british colony. There's a reason why 80% of russian billionaires are currently holding british passports and have ties to mi6. Anglos are very much in power even though their people are systematically getting exploited but then again can you remember a time in history where the peasants weren't?
They're mixed with anglosaxons and the most powerful ones are not in plain sight. The israeli narrative is a red herring to spoof you into a controlled opposition, take the chabad israelites for example are nothing but Rothschild ploys for new Israel.
Public information tells us that anglos make up 2/3 of the ones in charge. America is Rockefeller and Rothschild plaything, both mixed families with anglosaxons and yes, israelites. Along with current Israel, with which we're seeing G7 plans unfold. Read about the committee of 300. The sad reality is that you really think something like the patriotic war meant anything other than consolidation for wealthy bankers of the future... Look at the real owners of the federal reserve, it's israelites, on the leash of anglos.
7 months ago
Anonymous
>anglos make up 2/3 of the ones in charge
and how many of those are israelites?
>Emasculated by America
Preoccupied by a pesky French manlet, more like.
Sometimes when the game is on a timer, you need to quit the side missions to rush the final boss.
because english are meant to be the bad guys and it's hard to portray the boers as good guys considering their whole self-exile gimmick was because they wanted to keep slaves when britain was trying to end it
because english are meant to be the bad guys and it's hard to portray the boers as good guys considering their whole self-exile gimmick was because they wanted to keep slaves when britain was trying to end it
the first ever labor camp was created in this war, 26000 people were brutally and savagely murdered by bongs over livestock disputes, a feat all too typical for a nation whose main wealth came form pillaging
Marxist, mercantilist drivel. The first ever recorded labor camps come from China. Europe was wealthy even before they started colonizing the world. In fact they could only colonize the world because they had existing wealth. Europeans got wealthy in the middle ages for a variety of reasons but a big one is that the Catholic church banned cousin marriage, which allowed neutral institutions to flourish. They escaped the pit of tribalism first, which allowed for cooperation on a larger scale. Even in the 14th century, Europe was standing head and shoulders above the rest of the world because of high human capital.
it's funny, you can read about the brits ruling over india and trying to get indian workers to work factories like they did in britain. even with all the same equipment and training etc., the british workers were something like 10 times more efficient than the indians, the brits would've needed to pay someone to literally stand there with a whip watching them 24/7 to get them to be as productive as europeans were
euros conquered the world because of the 8 hour work day, where people actually worked for 8 hours instead of sitting around gaffing with their family. pure merit.
This. The term concerntration camp came about during the Boer Wars, not the concept itself. I'm not exactly a huge chest thumper over the Empire but it's so fricking tedious seeing people dial the ruthless shit they did do up to 11, i.e. the Boer Camps or Irish Famine were genocides orchestrated by a shadowy cabal, or that this centuries-long Empire was largely animated by a singular ideology in the way the Third Reich was. It's all nonsensical bullshit. And don't get me started on the revionism the Scots do. The 'Braveheart Effect' has to be a thing for sure. These chippy c**ts seem convinced they were akin to Indians or blacks in the Empire at its height rather than a minority that had a disproportionate amount of influence. When it comes to the Welsh, English, Scots, and Irish, the Scots were the israelites of the British Empire at its height.
>These chippy c**ts seem convinced they were akin to Indians or blacks in the Empire at its height rather than a minority that had a disproportionate amount of influence.
This was actually recognised at the time when Irish Home Rule was a big debate, elements in Wales and Scotland wanted internal reform here and there, etc. Some writer making a wry remark about how England is governed by Scots, kicked by Irishmen, and plundered by Welshmen at a time when the Cabinent and PM post was largely non-English by either birth or descent.
>The 'Braveheart Effect' has to be a thing for sure. These chippy c**ts seem convinced they were akin to Indians or blacks in the Empire at
Based English moron
English people. They've never been to Scotland and haven't talked to a person from there but are convinced they know what people think in here.
Do I need to timestamp a picture of my cupboard full of coltsfoot rock or something? Pure fricking embarrassing when leddit morons like yous make a baseless claim, get told otherwise and then pull the UHHH UHHH NO NOBODY ON THE INTERNET IS [group that I said you're not in]
7 months ago
Anonymous
I really don't care. I know you're wrong and don't feel the need to prove myself to you.
Marxist, mercantilist drivel. The first ever recorded labor camps come from China. Europe was wealthy even before they started colonizing the world. In fact they could only colonize the world because they had existing wealth. Europeans got wealthy in the middle ages for a variety of reasons but a big one is that the Catholic church banned cousin marriage, which allowed neutral institutions to flourish. They escaped the pit of tribalism first, which allowed for cooperation on a larger scale. Even in the 14th century, Europe was standing head and shoulders above the rest of the world because of high human capital.
>source as harvard
Oh you mean the same scholars that were paid by CIA to formulate a 3 book plan to dismantle the USSR? The eternal anglo just like the germanoid has been nothing but a plague on the entire world and colonialism is the least genuinely evil thing they've done lol. I don't even care for pajeets that much but I think it's amusing they're the only nation and people in the world that managed to detach themselves entirely. Even today their shitstain economy is largely independent of dollar and pound hijinks.
>the first ever labor camp was created in this war
Lmao what
Ah yes for the preceding eleventy billion years of human and protohuman existence nobody ever thought of making captives work to earn their keep
Was it not so that the neanderthals held great debates on the proper accordances to afford captive tribesmen
>the first ever labor camp was created in this war
This is moronic. Throughout all that history anglos have shown it's more convenient and resource effectient to simply commit mass acts of genocide instead. Even on their own island.
Well it's a fact, they became a super power by legalizing piratry, going to war with the catholic church and against the weakest regions in the world populated by pointy sticks tribes.
Only problem is that Dutch are worst.
Let me rephrase:
The Scandinavians were Northern Europeans, while the French-Britons were the returning British people who belonged to the British Isles originally but were forced to move to France at an earlier point in time.
And they formed England's greatest dynasty: the Plantagenets.
>Throws a gay out of a window >Beats his gay son >Abuses a French girl >Murders the pagan Scottish like animals
Failing to see anything here but shining examples of good Christian deeds.
It's absolute kino. Honestly, it wouldn't bother me so much if there were people complaining about Braveheart if it weren't for the fact that usually the people who complain about the movie are redditors who hate Mel or just very annoying people.
No offense.
Between the outright bullshit and the fake chainmail, I'm not sure you'd know kino if it bit you on the nose while your face was in your cereal bowl.
No offense.
>A major gulf has already appeared between Western Europe and the rest of the world prior to 1500 AD. No large-population countries outside West Europe produce notable people at very high rates (Armenia, a small country, is the best non-European performer in this period). On the other hand, all West European countries except Ireland produce notable people at least at moderately high rates, and most at very high rates between 1000 and 1500 AD.
https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-west
Scottish inventions:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Scottish_inventions_and_discoveries
Meanwhile Ireland doesn't have a page. But I found this timeline. Seems like the Irish made a lot of advances in beer making, lol.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Irish_inventions_and_discoveries
The movie was still badass if not totally historically accurate and every chick I've watched it with says while they know they're *supposed* to hate Longshanks he comes across as a complete badass when he tosses Philip out the window.
Official Women Power Rankings >Med >Latina
POWER GAP >Eastern European >East Asian
POWER GAP >Black >Middle Eastern >Southeast Asian
POWER GAP >Blow-Up Doll >Rich Poos
POWER GAP >Poor Poos
POWER GAP >Angloid women
This goes for all aspects of womanhood, including cooking. Angloid women are the least loyal creatures on the planet
I disagree. My ex was from Leeds and loyalty was the only good thing she had going for her. It's not the nationality, it's western values as a whole, women have gone to absolute shit.
Has there ever been a country with so many babyface/heel turns in history?
I swear there is no way to avoid reading about English history and not alternating between lauding them and wanting their whole junk-heap island to sink into the ocean.
>listening to history podcast by some English guys >*interesting information* >*interesting information* >*interesting information*
suddenly >WHITE GUILT SO SORRY
GUILT SO SORRY
We are who we are.
At least it's historically accurate.
Edward I expelled the small hats from England in 1290.
Kneel before him.
>expelled
wrong word beginning with ex
could have saved us a lot of trouble
>wanted to go to Jerusalem and be remembered as a crusader king
>can’t go because Scots keep revolting back home
You mad Eddie boy?
Is that true? Kek that's pretty fricking funny. Based rebellious scots to crush
Eddie I did the pre-Crusade consecration thing like 3 times in his life, and every time got wienerblocked by domestic unrest (although I think 1 of the times it was from Llywelyn ap Gruffydd's attacks in the Marches instead of the Jocks)
I mean he’s called the ‘Hammer of the Scots’ for a reason.
Wasn't that James I?
>modern movie
>The English are evil and incompetent
>Chad father
>Weak son
Are french people really like this???
Edward II wasn’t as bad as people make out he was an incompetent king who had favourites which caused big turmoil in the court and he lost a lot of English territory in France but he wasn’t an effeminate weakling either.
Edward ii was a bara homosexual
>french
history is not my strongest
so were they normans in braveheart or what?
>movie set on earth
>anglochads are the protagonists
>mfw
Anglos and Germanics were always evil and in combination they are completely unstoppable. Even today, look at the Rothschild family. The entire financial system that we know as western capitalism is controlled by anglos behind the scenes(committee of 300). They in turn control the bilderberg and other israeli cronies.
>Longshanks
was not Anglo. He was a Norman descendant. Normans themselves were a mixture of Scandinavians and French-Britons.
Longshanks was a descendant of King Alfred. He's an Anglo.
He was also the first King of England to habitually speak English at court. After all he was named by his father Henry III after Edward the confessor, and Henry was a big angloboo. At the time it was unusual to name an heir to the throne such an archaic Anglo Saxon name.
No wonder he was such a limp dicked cuck
You're saying this in English
Because of USA
Because of England
Because they got cucked so hard by their old colony, sure. Congratulations Nigel, be sure to thank all the Americans for helping you in TWO world wars lol
Longshanks belonged to House of Plantagenet.
>House of Plantagenet
A French-Norman line.
the royal navy ended slavery
where's my movie about that
>have "history's largest empire"
>it's literally just pooistan, a desert prison island colony, scattered poor african states, and one worthwhile colony that quickly fights its way to independence and then eclipses you in every imaginable way
Bravo
i mean the israelites have been in control of Hollywood since what? the 50s?
what did you think was gonna happen?
>its da jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooos
good morning sir
It is, but it also is much worse than a random nationality from the desert. Stay unconscious. The shit posted on pol is barely scratching the surface. Go read The History of Central Banks and research the wealthiest family legacies throughout history.
It doesn't really matter. That entire peninsular area all the way to west Germany was a humanity powerhouse throughout most of history and it produced exceptional individuals, much of whom still have their legacies in everything.
Let me rephrase:
The Scandinavians were Northern Europeans, while the French-Britons were the returning British people who belonged to the British Isles originally but were forced to move to France at an earlier point in time.
And they formed England's greatest dynasty: the Plantagenets.
my bluepilled gamer brother who does nothing but watch goyslop & watch streamers all day sent me this meme couple of days ago
it's over for ~~*You*~~
>NOOOOO NOT MY MAGIC ELFS
Saying you're bored of something or putting "muh" in front of it or whatever doesn't magically make it not true. (That said, Braveheart's many inaccuracies are hilariously entertaining, even to a bong like me.)
ALBA GU BRATHHHHHHH!!!!!!!
bro why are you putting greentext on the title?
>First historical appearance is a genocide of a celt population after betrayal
>Lose wars to danes, genocide their settlements after they sail from isle
>Start colonisation of a new world with a genocide
>Genocide Irish after not tasting blood long enough
>Genocide abbos
>Genocide maori
>Genocide themselves by importing poos
>As a parting gift to the world start genocide of a palestinians by creating Israel
Nah they good boyz dindu nuffin
Now genociding themselves by importing shitskins.
For me? For me it's Edward the Third
>>The English are evil!
I mean, they were for the vast majority of their existence. Until the end of WW2 when they were emasculated by America and rendered useless
>emasculated
In image only. Economically the anglos are still behind every single major move, Russia for example is a british colony. There's a reason why 80% of russian billionaires are currently holding british passports and have ties to mi6. Anglos are very much in power even though their people are systematically getting exploited but then again can you remember a time in history where the peasants weren't?
The british upper class is disproportionately israeli
They're mixed with anglosaxons and the most powerful ones are not in plain sight. The israeli narrative is a red herring to spoof you into a controlled opposition, take the chabad israelites for example are nothing but Rothschild ploys for new Israel.
>noooo the anglos are still in charge we're totally not America's b***h
Public information tells us that anglos make up 2/3 of the ones in charge. America is Rockefeller and Rothschild plaything, both mixed families with anglosaxons and yes, israelites. Along with current Israel, with which we're seeing G7 plans unfold. Read about the committee of 300. The sad reality is that you really think something like the patriotic war meant anything other than consolidation for wealthy bankers of the future... Look at the real owners of the federal reserve, it's israelites, on the leash of anglos.
>anglos make up 2/3 of the ones in charge
and how many of those are israelites?
>Emasculated by America
Preoccupied by a pesky French manlet, more like.
Sometimes when the game is on a timer, you need to quit the side missions to rush the final boss.
So preoccupied you never recovered, huh Nigel?
King characters are disportionately evil in movies and kings characters are usually english cause we associate the english with monarchy
The only good aspect of the Hamilton musical was the depiction of George 3rd as a psychopath with a sissy voice
George III wasn't a psychopath
Take your meds Georgie
Why don’t we get any kino about the Boer Wars?
because english are meant to be the bad guys and it's hard to portray the boers as good guys considering their whole self-exile gimmick was because they wanted to keep slaves when britain was trying to end it
the first ever labor camp was created in this war, 26000 people were brutally and savagely murdered by bongs over livestock disputes, a feat all too typical for a nation whose main wealth came form pillaging
Marxist, mercantilist drivel. The first ever recorded labor camps come from China. Europe was wealthy even before they started colonizing the world. In fact they could only colonize the world because they had existing wealth. Europeans got wealthy in the middle ages for a variety of reasons but a big one is that the Catholic church banned cousin marriage, which allowed neutral institutions to flourish. They escaped the pit of tribalism first, which allowed for cooperation on a larger scale. Even in the 14th century, Europe was standing head and shoulders above the rest of the world because of high human capital.
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2019/11/roman-catholic-church-ban-in-the-middle-ages-loosened-family-ties/
it's funny, you can read about the brits ruling over india and trying to get indian workers to work factories like they did in britain. even with all the same equipment and training etc., the british workers were something like 10 times more efficient than the indians, the brits would've needed to pay someone to literally stand there with a whip watching them 24/7 to get them to be as productive as europeans were
euros conquered the world because of the 8 hour work day, where people actually worked for 8 hours instead of sitting around gaffing with their family. pure merit.
This. The term concerntration camp came about during the Boer Wars, not the concept itself. I'm not exactly a huge chest thumper over the Empire but it's so fricking tedious seeing people dial the ruthless shit they did do up to 11, i.e. the Boer Camps or Irish Famine were genocides orchestrated by a shadowy cabal, or that this centuries-long Empire was largely animated by a singular ideology in the way the Third Reich was. It's all nonsensical bullshit. And don't get me started on the revionism the Scots do. The 'Braveheart Effect' has to be a thing for sure. These chippy c**ts seem convinced they were akin to Indians or blacks in the Empire at its height rather than a minority that had a disproportionate amount of influence. When it comes to the Welsh, English, Scots, and Irish, the Scots were the israelites of the British Empire at its height.
>These chippy c**ts seem convinced they were akin to Indians or blacks in the Empire at its height rather than a minority that had a disproportionate amount of influence.
This was actually recognised at the time when Irish Home Rule was a big debate, elements in Wales and Scotland wanted internal reform here and there, etc. Some writer making a wry remark about how England is governed by Scots, kicked by Irishmen, and plundered by Welshmen at a time when the Cabinent and PM post was largely non-English by either birth or descent.
>The 'Braveheart Effect' has to be a thing for sure. These chippy c**ts seem convinced they were akin to Indians or blacks in the Empire at
Based English moron
English people. They've never been to Scotland and haven't talked to a person from there but are convinced they know what people think in here.
am scottish ya specky bam
Yes I'm sure you are
Do I need to timestamp a picture of my cupboard full of coltsfoot rock or something? Pure fricking embarrassing when leddit morons like yous make a baseless claim, get told otherwise and then pull the UHHH UHHH NO NOBODY ON THE INTERNET IS [group that I said you're not in]
I really don't care. I know you're wrong and don't feel the need to prove myself to you.
>source as harvard
Oh you mean the same scholars that were paid by CIA to formulate a 3 book plan to dismantle the USSR? The eternal anglo just like the germanoid has been nothing but a plague on the entire world and colonialism is the least genuinely evil thing they've done lol. I don't even care for pajeets that much but I think it's amusing they're the only nation and people in the world that managed to detach themselves entirely. Even today their shitstain economy is largely independent of dollar and pound hijinks.
Also the "shadowy cabal" is the british monarchy originally. Later on power consolidated with the Rothschild family.
>the first ever labor camp was created in this war
Lmao what
Ah yes for the preceding eleventy billion years of human and protohuman existence nobody ever thought of making captives work to earn their keep
Was it not so that the neanderthals held great debates on the proper accordances to afford captive tribesmen
>the first ever labor camp was created in this war
This is moronic. Throughout all that history anglos have shown it's more convenient and resource effectient to simply commit mass acts of genocide instead. Even on their own island.
Breaker Morant
>But we bequeath a parting tip
>For sound advice of such men
>Who come across in transport ship
>To polish off the Dutchmen.
>If you encounter any Boers
>You really must not loot ‘em,
>And, if you wish to leave these shores,
>For pity’s sake, don’t shoot ‘em.
Well it's a fact, they became a super power by legalizing piratry, going to war with the catholic church and against the weakest regions in the world populated by pointy sticks tribes.
Only problem is that Dutch are worst.
The Portuguese trump the Dutch in being shitbags. They were such shitters that they're the reason the Chinese call all Europeans 'foreign devils'.
>king of England
>English
LOL
the moortugese are irrelevant
low quality, low IQ, low effort COPE
>Throws a gay out of a window
>Beats his gay son
>Abuses a French girl
>Murders the pagan Scottish like animals
Failing to see anything here but shining examples of good Christian deeds.
>pagan Scottish
Scotland has been a christian country since the various kingdoms within it were united and "scotland" was formed
the pagan Scottish
No one ha been pagan in Scotland for 800 years by then or 300 in the north
Braveheart is kino
Braveheart is fricking lies. William Wallace was a paid merc for the fricking French.
>William Wallace was a paid merc for the fricking French.
No he wasn't
t. some dumb Scot that drank the Kool-Aid
Its a damn good movie, regardless of "accuracy"
It's absolute kino. Honestly, it wouldn't bother me so much if there were people complaining about Braveheart if it weren't for the fact that usually the people who complain about the movie are redditors who hate Mel or just very annoying people.
No offense.
Between the outright bullshit and the fake chainmail, I'm not sure you'd know kino if it bit you on the nose while your face was in your cereal bowl.
No offense.
I'm the kino man. Anything made by Mel is a masterpiece and I will defend Braveheart forever.
Mel is based, but his contempt for the English biases everything.
>but his contempt for the English biases everything.
Go home Saxon
Friendly reminder that the scots won and secretly rule the world via the Scottish freemasons and the Jesuits
The Scottish and Irish bend the knee to the Dutch
Did they really behead her?
did you watch the movie?
Yes. The English army killed every member of Wallace's family except his mother.
>A major gulf has already appeared between Western Europe and the rest of the world prior to 1500 AD. No large-population countries outside West Europe produce notable people at very high rates (Armenia, a small country, is the best non-European performer in this period). On the other hand, all West European countries except Ireland produce notable people at least at moderately high rates, and most at very high rates between 1000 and 1500 AD.
https://inquisitivebird.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-the-west
The Irish confirmed as non-White.
>non-White
Nobody's white until they move to Chicago
Irish and britbongs are the exact same Nigel
Scottish inventions:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Scottish_inventions_and_discoveries
Meanwhile Ireland doesn't have a page. But I found this timeline. Seems like the Irish made a lot of advances in beer making, lol.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Irish_inventions_and_discoveries
Again, all you ugly inbred fricks from those rainy shitty muddy islands are the same, this quibbling is pathetic
M-muh Islamic golden a-ACK
The movie was still badass if not totally historically accurate and every chick I've watched it with says while they know they're *supposed* to hate Longshanks he comes across as a complete badass when he tosses Philip out the window.
>Platagenet king
this """"""English"""""" king spoke exclusively French
English was for peasants
anglo dogs are evil subhumans
Official Women Power Rankings
>Med
>Latina
POWER GAP
>Eastern European
>East Asian
POWER GAP
>Black
>Middle Eastern
>Southeast Asian
POWER GAP
>Blow-Up Doll
>Rich Poos
POWER GAP
>Poor Poos
POWER GAP
>Angloid women
This goes for all aspects of womanhood, including cooking. Angloid women are the least loyal creatures on the planet
I disagree. My ex was from Leeds and loyalty was the only good thing she had going for her. It's not the nationality, it's western values as a whole, women have gone to absolute shit.
>leeds
She had miles of wiener between her ugly pale legs anon, glad she's your ex now. Find a non-Angloid woman and experience the difference
because men are even worse. weak, fat, stupid, cowardly. look at yourselves... anglo men are even worse, look at this homosexual
guarantee you he ain't got an ounce on testosterone in his entire family
Has there ever been a country with so many babyface/heel turns in history?
I swear there is no way to avoid reading about English history and not alternating between lauding them and wanting their whole junk-heap island to sink into the ocean.
Most Hollywood movies are written by Americans. We still see the British Empire as evil.
>listening to history podcast by some English guys
>*interesting information*
>*interesting information*
>*interesting information*
suddenly
>WHITE GUILT SO SORRY
GUILT SO SORRY
GUILT SO SORRY
So irritating.